Отзывы о Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806
Где купить
Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806
|
Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806 черный | Яндекс Маркет | 47 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806 белый | Яндекс Маркет | 47 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
Плюсы по отзывам пользователей - Почему стоит купить Canon LEGRIA HF R806?
- Отличное качество видео в хорошем освещении:
- Яркие, насыщенные цвета и высокая резкость в Full HD 1080p, превосходит многие потребительские модели.
- Подходит для дневной съёмки на улице, пейзажей и событий, с деталями как у профессиональных камер.
- Режимы 24p и 60i дают кинематографический эффект, хвалят за плавность движения.
- Эффективный стабилизатор изображения:
- Powered IS и Dynamic IS позволяют снимать с рук на максимальном зуме без тряски.
- Работает лучше, чем у Panasonic и Sony в сравнениях, идеально для ходьбы и панорам.
- Три режима стабилизации, включая усиленный для динамичных сцен.
- Два слота для SD-карт:
- Relay-запись: переходит на вторую карту автоматически, до 5 часов на 32 ГБ картах.
- Карты легко извлекаются для прямого импорта в редакторы без копирования.
- Поддержка Class 6/10, неограниченное время записи с запасными картами.
- Большой сенсорный экран:
- 3.5" LCD с высоким разрешением, чёткий для фокусировки и просмотра.
- Поворотный на 180°, удобен для съёмки сверху или селфи.
- Интуитивное меню, быстрый доступ к функциям касанием.
- Быстрый автофокус и распознавание лиц:
- Instant AF фокусируется мгновенно даже на движущихся объектах.
- Отслеживает лица в толпе, точная экспозиция в автоматическом режиме.
- Работает в динамике, лучше аналогов по скорости.
- Удобная эргономика и компактность:
- Лёгкая (менее 500 г), удобно лежит в руке, логичное расположение кнопок.
- Поддержка аксессуаров: микрофон, свет, фильтры 58 мм.
- Тихая работа без движущихся частей, идеально для семейной съёмки.
- Хорошее качество фото и дополнительные режимы:
- 8 МП фото во время видео, лучше веб-камер и дешёвых фотоаппаратов.
- Режимы Cinema 24p, замедленная съёмка, эффекты для творчества.
- AVCHD-формат удобен для редактирования в Premiere или iMovie.
Минусы по отзывам пользователей - О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой:
- Шумит в слабом освещении:
- Видимые шумы в помещении или вечером, даже с gain до 18 дБ.
- Хуже Panasonic TM700 в low light, требует ручной выдержки или света.
- Авторежим задирает ISO, приводит к размытию или зерну.
- Слабый штатный аккумулятор:
- Держит 60-90 минут записи, требует внешнего зарядника или запасных.
- Трудно извлекать, особенно мокрыми руками; нужны BP-827 (3-5 часов).
- Не заряжается отдельно без доп. зарядки.
- Отсутствие видоискателя:
- Экран плохо виден на ярком солнце, бликует.
- Проблема для съёмки на улице, нужна навеска или модель с EVF (S21).
- Слепит в ярком свете, снижает удобство.
- Узкий угол объектива:
- 43 мм экв., не хватает для помещений или групп (хуже Sony CX550V, Panasonic).
- Требует насадки-ширика, ограничивает съёмку в тесноте.
- Неудобно для семейных видео дома.
- Проблемы с подключением к ПК:
- Не видна как съёмное устройство, требует ПО Canon; .mod/.mts не всегда играет.
- Для USB нужен зарядник, иначе не копирует; плееры вроде MPC требуют настроек.
- ПО неинтуитивное, конфликты с кодеками.
- Шум в аудио и эргономика экрана:
- Звук зума/привода попадает в запись; слабые низы без внешнего микрофона.
- Сенсорный экран не всегда отзывчивый, требует нажатия; случайные срабатывания.
- Глянцевый корпус пачкается, скользкий мокрыми руками.
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
404 отзывов пользователей о Canon LEGRIA HF R806
Пользовались
Canon LEGRIA HF R806?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
27.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
What is there to say? Canon lens, and image processing. I've had this for more than 2 years now and it's been very reliable. At the top bit rate, the images are clear, sharp. Granted, it's a little grainy in low light, but that's the tradeoff with digital. Lots of options to fine-tune your video with pro controls--quite surprising in such an affordable consumer product. I shoot with this often and it has never let me down. One gripe: the touch-screen interface is a bit clunky. However, if you can get your hands on one, I would. The image is just as good as today's prosumers (I just bought a VIXIA R400 for two-camera setups); the high-bit rate settings look identical to the HF S200's. I also like that you can download firmware from Canon so that this will take the new, larger-capacity SD cards.
Скромный эксперт
08.10.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Fantastic camera/video camera. Nothing will replace a great SLR, but for a dual purpose camera, this is fantastic. The video quality is great, the photos are very nice as well.My only issue is that night photos are pretty tough. Taking photos in dark settings is very difficult in general, I get that, but this camera struggles a bit. Always too dark or with a crazy bright flash. Some user error, I am sure, but I know this is a common complaint for this camera.White balance is a bit tricky as the 'auto balance' seems to struggle. But if you play around with the manual settings (or pre-set balances), you can get some amazing shots so you don't have to find the right settings. Outdoor photos with the 'shade' white balance that comes with the camera is great. It adds some incredible depth and color to your photos.Worth a buy when looking for more than an entry level camera without breaking the bank on tipping over the line to a 'pro' model.
Скромный эксперт
23.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
great condition but no remote (not a big deal) overall will deal with them again many more times in the future a++++++++++++++++++
Скромный эксперт
04.04.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm generally more of a still photographer at heart, but I finally decided to purchase an HD video camera, and after considerable research, I chose the Canon HF-S200. It seemed to have the right mix of features, size, price and quality - and so far, it's measured up.From an ergonomics point of view, I found the camera about right for my hands. The controls seem logically laid out, and it fits naturally in my hand in a way that lets me hold it steady without feeling awkward. Still, even though the camera is barely a pound in weight, to get the best HD quality, you'll want to consider a monopod, tripod or some other support. I use a Kirk shoulder harness borrowed from one of my still cameras, and it works well. Otherwise, the controls seem to be where I'd like them and it took fairly little effort to get to the point where I could operate most of the features without fixating on the camera itself. Also, because of the memory card architecture, there are no moving parts in the recording system (there are of course moving parts in the lens, focusing mechanism, zoom, etc), making it quick, responsive and - best of all - totally silent in operation.The camera also has all the right connections, including HDMI input/output, LANC remote controls, and connectors for outboard audio or microphones. The camera also has a shoe mount for things like video lights, and it can connect to some of Canon's cool accessories like their DVD burner (which I don't own, so I can't comment on).This recorder writes to SD (SDHC) memory cards - up to two at a time, with the ability to fill one then overflow onto the other. Recording times are purely a function of how large your memory cards are, but assuming 32GB cards, you can get almost five hours of HD recording time by installing two cards in the S200. And of course you can carry a pocket full of extras, making recording time essentially unlimited. The AVCHD video format means you can plug your cards directly into many video editing programs with no need to transform or re-do anything. All in all, this is very convenient compared to other media (such as tape) where you essentially have to copy video to your computer as a separate step before you can work with it.The camera includes a 10x zoom Canon lens, plus an additional digital zoom feature. I found the lens to be very good for a camcorder, producing bright, sharp and detailed videos with good color and contrast. Still, if you look at the output frame by frame on a computer, you can tell the lens - while impressive - is no match for a top quality DSLR lens. Plus, you're getting only an effective 6-8MP - pretty low by today's DSLR standards. I'm not so sure this is an issue, but I guess I don't shoot serious video with my DSLR, and I wouldn't shoot serious stills on my video camera. In 35mm terms, the range is about 43-435mm...good on the long end, but not quite as wide as I might like overall. Still, it's a fast lens and focuses close (about a foot, depending on zoom setting). A final nice feature is that the lens takes standard photo filters (58mm), and I find it handy for instance to screw on a polarizer sometimes.I find most of the other features Canon includes to work well and to be thoughtfully designed. The 3.5" LCD panel is sharp and clear, although not always readable in bright sunlight. Auto-exposure and focus seem very fast and accurate, and even when there's a lot of fast motion, I usually find all the critical parts of the scene to be in sharp focus and properly exposed, aided by Canon's face and scene detection capabilities. When you want to, you can override exposure and focus to get a specific effect.This is also the first consumer camcorder I've used that offers a choice of frame rates, from 24p to 30, giving you video that can have more of a film-like quality (24p) or be more natural to post online (30). The camera also has support for the latest wide-gamut color (x.v.color), giving you rich and vibrant colors if the rest of your equipment can handle it. In my case, displayed on a high-quality 60" plasma monitor, the videos look amazing.To be clear, this camera is essentially the same as the Canon S20 or S21, the main difference among the models being the amount of on-board memory. I believe the S21 comes with 64GB built-in, the S20 has 32GB and this one (S200) has only the SD slots - you supply the memory. Since I like the idea of external memory cards that I can pop into my computer for editing and post-production, I think I'd end up using the slots anyway, and the onboard memory in the other models wouldn't be particularly helpful for me. This was the main reason I went with the S200 instead of one of the other models.From an overall image quality perspective, the Canon offers the best image quality I've seen from a consumer product, period. HD images in 1080p are simply stunning, as good as anything you'll find anywhere. The image stabilization helps ensure you don't get "bumpy" scenes, and even the audio cha
Скромный эксперт
15.05.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought the Vixia H S200 based on the many good reviews and the top rating on cNet. It is a great all around camcorder no doubt with fabulous image and video quality. It ranks at the top of what's out there today in the prosumer or near-prosumer category. Then I read about the Panasonic HDC-TM700 and especially the comparison of the Panasonic with the Canon VIXIA H S21 was intersting. The Vixia H S200, VIXIA H S20 and VIXIA H S21 are identical from a hardware/firmware perspective, just that the H S21 has a viewfinder and 64GB built in memory, the H S20 has 32GB built in memory plus SDHC slot and the H S200 does only have SDHC card slots.The Panasonic beat the $400 more expensive Canon easily. So I decided to do my own comparo and ordered the HDC-TM700. Now after two weeks of comparative footage I have to agree. The Panasonic HDC-TM 700 is the better camcorder for all the same reasons listed on camcorderinfo.Since this is a common comparison many consumers are doing these days, I will frame my input here in a Canon vs. Panasonic list.Pros of the Canon VIXIA H S21/20/200 camcorders vs. the HDC-TM700:- Sound quality seems a tad better, but not much- 3" touch screen is much larger and has much, much higher resolution- Menu structure is better- Still image capability is significantly better- Video gain functionis flat out excellent and can effectively be used to increase low light sensitivity, while reducing image noise drastically- Two SDHC card slots- Flash is more powerful- Has a built in video light, even though it's meek- Hot shoe layout is much better than Panasonic, but it's a Canon proprietary design, so you can only use Canon accesories- The standard battery is not very large (last about 80-90 minutes) quite tricky to eject, especially when you have wet or sweaty hands. It doesn't come right out when you release the lock and is hard to pull out.- The hand loop is very chintzy and permanently mounted to the camera body (cannot be replaced if it wears out). It is not big enough for larger hands and constantly a bother.Pros of the Panasonic HDC-TM700 vs. the Canon VIXIA H S21/20/200- Lowest price of all of these ... even lower than the H S200 which has no viewfinder and no built in memory- Far better video image quality in all aspects in the new 1080p60 mode, especially resolution and sharpness- Smoother video quality, especially when panning- Better and more vivid colors .. this used to be Canon's strength ... go figure- Better low light capability and better low light colors, although video gain function is much better on the Canon- Wider angle, 12x aoom and faster lens f/1.5 ... this seem unimportant, but the wider lens is immensly important for capturing everything in close ups. Big advantage for the Panasonic!- More manual controls, especially the fact sharpness levels can be set !!- Much more comfortable to handle and operate. The Canons are quite a bit larger in size and more awkward to handle.- Better full size manual control ring around the entire lens vs. the silly knob on the Canons- Has a real battery charger/power supply in which you can charge one battery while the other can be charged on the cam simultaneously (Canon has only a power supply, a charger to charge batteries out of the cam is extra!)Things I don't like:Canons: Lens is not wide angle enough which makes getting all into the picture, especially challenging for inside a home or when close up. Touch screen is not very sensitive and smooth scrolling through the menu is difficult. I often also accidentally selected a menu items while trying to scroll. This really needs work and makes the high res screen quite cumbersome. Lack of a real battery charger and on top of that the power pack has a proprietary plug (for all of my Nikon and Panasonic gear I only need to take one AC cord and can use it with all chargers or power packs, for this camcorder you need a proprietary AC cord!). The camcorder is a bit awkward to hold and really too big for today's standard. Glossy high shine finish makes the camcorder slippery with wet or sweaty fingers and you see every finger print.Panasonic: The bolt-on accessory shoe is a real joke. Like a massive bolt on to the side. Screen and menu structure not up to par of the Canons, albeit the touch screen works much better for touch commands. Cooling fan is a moving part and will break eventually. Only one card slot.In the end I am after the best video quality and most vibrant colors with super sharp footage. In that department the Canons do not even come close to the new Panasonic. Period. Since I am also carrying a bunch of Nikon gear around for still photography, I like that the Panasonic is smaller and is also much more comfortable to hold.
Скромный эксперт
18.10.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I really wanted a good quality HD camcorder for a long time, and almost purchased the Canon HF S100 model when it was out. I held back until S200 came out and decided to plunge. I'm glad I did. There are a few features that are critical to my decision:1. Reasonable video at night - getting the biggest image sensors means lessor grainy pictures at night, and this one does pretty good job2. Take pictures while recording - I can't count on any others around me to take pictures while I'm filming, so this is a highly valuable feature. Actually it's priceless for me.3. Image stablization - don't want the viewers (including me) to get dizzy. That happens quite often before. But Vixia S200 does a pretty darn good job.4. Lightweight enough, even adding a 4 hour battery.5. Investment that won't get obsolete so soon (video resolution / quality must be good for 5 - 7 years)While it doesn't have the absolute best in a single category, collectively just can't beat it especially below $900 when I bought it (now below $800).Some pleasant surprises (or happy to confirm other positive reviewers said):1. Life of the stock battery. Spec says it lasts just over one hour, and I was able to get about 1hr 20min of continuous day time recording. I do carrying a spare 6 hour battery to use when I'm recording on long hiking trips...2. Dual SD card slots. Very nice for overflow. I have a 32GB class 6 for recording, and 8GB for pictures. I can imagine using dual 64GB along with 6 hour battery!3. User interface - nicely done. Better than the S1004. Image quality is stunning! After getting a faster CPU laptop that was able to keep up with playing the full HD (1080p) files, I just awed at the spectacular details of the outdoors to every single standing hair of my kids. I actually can see dusts on my table and laptop with recording directly focus on them!5. Could hear the Dolby digital 5.1 effect when played with receiver and surround speakers!6. Remote was nice and had a descent range. I was able to control the recording at least 60 feet away.7. Cinema mode - very cool as everyone get to be filmed to be movie like! (I don't really care about super true to color, as ultimately my audience is my family and relatives)Some short comings but not big deal1. Stock lens doesn't get too good coverage in small areas. I bought a wide angle lens and that was adequate.2. Software - not very intuitive (as other reviews have noted). I had low expectations so no big deal. I always just drag/drop files out of SD card to my hard drive. Just use third party if desire to cut/edit.3. I do have a third party 6 hour battery (same OEM as Canon's though but without the smarts). So every time I turn on the camcorder, it would pop up a dialog box saying it can't recognize the battery: proceed or cancel. A bit annoying but understandable. If that tests your patience, spend a few more bucks and buy Canon.4. Plenty of finger prints on the touch screen. But easy to wipe. My iPhone and iPad are worse!5. No viewfinder (only in the S11 model I think). This is more of the fault of Amazon, as it had it in the description (while I made my purchase) but wasn't on Canon's website. I was still able to make out the picture on the touch screen decently in very bright sun lights. I had a Kodak v1273 12MP camera and that was impossible to see anything in bright light!Overall, this is every bit what I wanted and a sound investment for me. It records full HD 1080p with high enough frame rate, flexible with external SD card slots, super sharp images, and picture taking while filming.
Скромный эксперт
27.02.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The HFS200, HFS20, and HFS21 are the best options for the low budget indie filmmaker. That is until the next batch of Canon camcorders are released soon.Here is why the HFS200 is an ideal choice:(1) Frame rate options. You get true 23.98. This alone is worth it, since not many camcorders at this time have that frame rate. Then you get 60i, PF30 and PF24 which are both technically 60i. But sometimes it's useful to have PF24 if you want the 24p film look, but are also combining regular 60i footage into your editing timeline. By shooting PF24, you won't have to deal with longer render times if you're using Final Cut Pro 7 or under.(2) Decent in low light. The gain options are pretty good and when noise is introduced, it looks more like film grain. Also, the 1/2.6" CMOS sensor gives you awesome shallow depth of field for a compact consumer camera.(3) Manual controls. This one is a trade off. You get all the manual control options you need, but they are buried in the touch screen menus and you have to reset them every time something changes in your camera. This is time consuming and frustrating, but you get your control over exposure, shutter speed, white balance, etc.(4) Mic input. I'm always surprised that a lot of camcorders do not have mic inputs. Why? I sometimes use a preamp or a mixer attached to the HFS200 and then run my mics through that. It gets the cleanest audio. You always want to turn the camcorder's mic gain as low as you can, while keeping the audio signal around -12 dBs.(5) LCD. The HFS21 is the only model with an electronic viewfinder, but who needs that when you got an enormous 3.5" LCD screen! This thing will blow you away. It's gorgeous and Canon has been one of the few manufacturers that sport a giant LCD touch panel. This really makes a difference when focusing and framing for shots.Here is where the HFS200 needs improvement on:(1) Wider angle lens. I hate using wide angle lens adapters. I think it's about time camcorders come stock with a 24mm or 30mm wide angle. Well, 24mm is a bit much, but 28mm would be nice, too.(2) Better manual control interface. Actual buttons instead of menus options please. If anything, just give me separate Aperture, Shutter Speed, and Exposure lock control on physical buttons.(3) The little dial is cool, but a full focus ring would be better. (looking forward to the HFG10 and XA10)(4) An even bigger sensor would be heaven.
Скромный эксперт
23.05.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
We've owned a standard definition Canon FS-10 camcorder for two years and enjoyed every minute of it. It was a very dependable dual-purpose camera with solid components that never gave us a bit of trouble and always operated as designed. However, the attraction of true HD became just too strong to ignore. I chose the Canon HF-S200 after comparing all of the features of the top contenders in it's price range. These are the HF-S200's features that make us glad we bought it:Video and Still Photo Quality:Stunning video, even at 24fps (frames per second). At its standard 60i setting - you get the picture. Additionally, and one of the principle attractions for us, the 8 megapixel stills are what we needed so that we can take just one camera to events for excellent resolutions in both photo worlds. The stills we've taken with our HF-S200 compete with the best photos we've ever taken with any still camera. Though our digital still camera exceeds this resolution, 8Mpixel translates to a little bigger than 8"x10" prints at 300 dpi (dots per inch) resolution. Canon's dual picture mode, allowing us to snap high resolution stills while video recording, works seamlessly and is a welcome bonus feature we really enjoy. The Image Stabilizer (IS) and Powered IS yield very smooth motion on screen as advertised, a big advance from our older FS-10. Performance in all categories was impressive.Ergonomics and Connectivity:Canon got this right with their HF-S2xx family of camcorders. Our 200 just feels right all over. The few buttons I need to touch are literally at my finger tips. The ingenious touch screen menu and function controls are a breeze to operate - intuitive and responsive, with a very short learning curve. Connectivity is comprehensive, though I wish they had included the mini-to-standard HDMI cable I prefer to hook up to the HDTV. I found a nice adapter at Radio Shack though for the "mini" end for just nine bucks, so no points off for that. Honorable mention goes to their nice arrangement for the pop-up still flash/video light. It's right up front over the lens barrel, so my fingers never get in the way of its operation (I always hate that with our still cameras). Highest marks all around.RAM Storage:I have no complaints about Canon's internal digital storage systems, our FS-10's 8GB internal never acted up in the two years we used it. Still, I saw the flexibility of two SDHC ports as a plus in the unlikely event an internal chip became damaged. The 200 was my personal preference to avoid the possible expense and hassle that would involve. On the other hand, if one of the externals becomes corrupted, all we would lose would be the images on that chip. Maybe not even that, since recovery software is available from SanDisk if an SDHC goes bad.Purchase Source:Kudos to Amazon for outstanding pricing and delivery: Best price I could find, and three items from three sources all delivered on the same day, earlier than estimated. You guys are too good!Conclusion: Very impressive video/still camera we are very happy with (except I still wish Canon had tossed a mini-HDMI adapter in the box :-)
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 404.
Где купить
Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806
|
Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806 черный | Яндекс Маркет | 47 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Видеокамера Canon LEGRIA HF R806 белый | Яндекс Маркет | 47 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
График изменения цены Canon LEGRIA HF R806
Характеристи Canon LEGRIA HF R806
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Canon LEGRIA HF R806
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
