Отзывы о Твердотельный накопитель ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB
499 отзывов пользователей о ADATA XPG 1024 GB XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB
Пользовались
ADATA XPG 1024 GB XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
It was easy to install apart from that pesky m.2 screw!
Doing the windows installation was a pain in the backside though! I had to boot into windows from my old ssd then setup the disk that way.
Not as easy as I would have liked but luckily I’m the IT guy so I sorted it in 20/30 mins.
But the quality of this drive wow! Just blown away!
It does run hotter than my older drive (Western Digital Blue SN550 1tb) and looking on HWINFO one drive (listed as drive 3) on the XPG was getting rather hot, above 90 C! But using my boards included heatsink did the trick though and now stays below 60 under heavy sustained load. Not sure if it was a reporting error on HWINFO or something else unusual, but may be worth bearing in mind for those without board heatsinks, as the included black cover/heat spreader in the box doesn't appear to do much except make it look better.
Time will tell on how reliable it is, but so far so good on the speed front.
UserBenchmark rated my SSD set up at 291%
Easy to install and speed tests put it near the top of my expectations. Best upgrade I have made to my PC.
The internet has a few articles on ADATA swapping out the controllers in the SX8200 Pro with apparently a slower model - and this could explain my speeds, but I haven't figured out how to identify which is which, so take this part with a grain of salt.
CrystalDiskMark x64 results with the NVMe settings:
[Read]
SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 3021.685 MB/s [ 2881.7 IOPS] < 2434.28 us>
SEQ 128KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 3078.758 MB/s [ 23489.1 IOPS] < 1319.36 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 1363.035 MB/s [ 332772.2 IOPS] < 1489.46 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 69.957 MB/s [ 17079.3 IOPS] < 58.46 us>
[Write]
SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 2436.534 MB/s [ 2323.7 IOPS] < 3414.58 us>
SEQ 128KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 2374.058 MB/s [ 18112.6 IOPS] < 1756.08 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 1062.997 MB/s [ 259520.8 IOPS] < 1964.70 us>
RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 205.643 MB/s [ 50205.8 IOPS] < 19.83 us>
Profile: Default
Test: 1 GiB (x5) [D: 0% (0/768GiB)]
Mode: [Admin]
Time: Measure 5 sec / Interval 5 sec
Date: 2020/12/06 18:13:56
OS: Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 19042] (x64)
Temperature during testing peaked at 70 Celsius (with the thin heatsink sheet included with the drive), which seems plenty reasonable.
I am using it with this PCIe adapter: https://www.amazon.co.uk/NVME-Adapter-PCIe-6amLifestyle-Support/dp/B07RZZ3TJG
I chose this product over the more expensive Samsung EVO.
Installed in HP OMEN laptop (replacing the poor Toshiba 128 M.2 SSD) - now boot time is approx 3 secs as measure by task manager start up.
Happy with the performance. Too early to comment on reliability.
Anyone experiencing slow speeds likely don't have the correctly spec'ed MOBO to achieve maximum speeds e.g. only a 2 lane M.2 slot, if you have 2 slots on the MOBO usually only one is connected directly to the CPU and this is the one you should use for max speed as the other slot is likely shared lanes and will be considerable slower
Having said that if the Samsung 970 EVO plus had been on sale a few days earlier I would have bought it for basically the same price
Time will tell if it is durable
It made a difference when saving and using files, my PC feels more responsive, well worth the money.
It's quick, insanely quick.
The read and write speeds really are top notch, I've just put a couple of games on it but pretty much instant load times make it worth every penny.
Only wish I'd bought the 1TB version now but that will be the next purchase.
All id say is do you research first to make sure it fits in your MB, but if it does you won't regret it.
The software to use to transfer my data didn't work either so I used a free one that worked great
On the other side, there is probably no reason for you to buy NVME M.2 drive if your PC is anything different from a top spec £2000+ gaming rig or a server machine. Average consumer PC hardware doesn't have enough power to squeeze out all the juice from a high performance NVME, like this ADATA XPG. You're probably better off saving a couple of pounds buying a cheaper 1tb SATA SSD.
I now have an external back-up SSD that is theoretically faster than the other components of my computer system!
I expect that today I could probably buy a 1Tb SSD for the price I paid.......!
was back up and running in less than a hour.
fantastic .
Honestly compared to my other 2.5in form factor SSD's the extra speed didn't cut load times by that much maybe 1s faster.
Just great to have the thing not take up any drive bays nor extra cabling.
Happy with it and so far so good.
Heat spreader looks cool, no screw included fyi. My mobo had the screw and standoff screw already in place.
Pic attached for speeds.
Will keep review upto update if performance degrades.
Should really tell if I edit video files which I don't.
Windows loads a bit faster than before and for some reason, intel loads windows faster than my current Ryzen 2700x.
Got it at a deal, so I guess from now on I am only buying m2 since on everyday tasks it flies and has no issues on streaming or photo editing.
I still need to test it properly on huge files.
Temps with an aftermarket generic heatsink on the controller part only (it is highly advised not to use anything on the storage itself) haven't exceeded 50C under load so very pleased.
Industry leading power efficiency.
Silicon Motion SM2262EN Controller.
Less cost.
Plan on swapping out my other Nvme for more of these!
The READ SPEED is what it has on the review (3500 MB) but, the WRITE SPEED shown on the package (box) is ONLY UP TO 2300 MB. WHY the discrepancy ? This is either (A) FALSE ADVERTISEMENT {OR} (B) a TYPO ERROR on the Amazon webpage
Using it as system drive, great storage capacity and speed.
Price will always be a question as it can change as the wind blows, but I am satisfied with mine.
it is fast not seen my pc move so fast as when I installed and got this working
Granted isn't the most in depth test, but I installed Lego city undercover last night, and has cut the load time down to circa 12 seconds, as opposed to the 42 seconds it usually takes to get in game.
My only regret, is going for the 512GB instead of the 1TB.






