455 отзывов пользователей o Western Digital 2 ТБ WD2001FASS
Пользовались
Western Digital 2 ТБ WD2001FASS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Кронос-1MZYE
13.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + информацию не потерял. Выходит из строя поэтапно. Можно заметить сначала снижение производительности и успеть скопировать данные.
- - срок службы около 50 тыс. часов. около 9 тыс. включений/выключений.
покупал два диска. оба вышли из строя приблизительно в одно время. Стоял под \home (вышел из строя первым) и второй диск был под \backup (вышел из строя вторым).
Дроид-3ZGWJ
13.12.2023
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
Сломался через два года , и все два терабайта информации пропали(
Квазар-0DPTS
28.12.2015
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Обычный диск
- - Очень недолговечен. В работе было 12 дисков, умерли все, не проработав даже гарантийный...
Астрономад-1SHTC
11.12.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Быстрый, недорогой. Да, гарантия 60 месяцев!
- - Шумный, звук считывающих головок. UPD: Перехвалил. Ну ровно через 4 года помер. Спасибо сетевому магазину Ю - приняли...
Нейрон-6ROJJ
29.09.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + обьём
- - не долговечность
2 тб это очень много,никогда больше 1тб не использовал,тогда зачем переплачивать?После...
НеоВояжер-3RXJB
16.09.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + *скорость
- - *Сильный треск
*Греется сильнее других
После 10 месяцев использования в домашнем пк умер, предположительно...
ИнфраГость-7MEYW
24.07.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Довольно быстрый жесткий диск, у нас в магазине купил за 3500 , в связи с появлением новых аналогичных моделей на SATA III.Так что из преимуществ на данный момент еще отмечу цену. А кроме треска никаких шумовых недовольств жд мне не принсит, так как у меня коробка жд с резиновыми стяжками, так что жд закреплен очень крепко и смягчен резиной во избежание стуков.
- - Похрустывает при активной работе, но мой старичек Сеагейт трещал не тише, но в связи со своей старостью...
Кронос-2ZSYL
16.06.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Сравнительно высокая скорость при линейном чтении и записи.
- - Брал для работы с некомпрессированным видео, но этот диск показал себя с худшей стороны в этой дисциплине.
Попытки проиграть тяжёлые видеофайлы часто приводят к сильному грохоту механики - словно при сильной дефрагментации - диск просто стучит и ничего не проигрывает. Даже слайдшоу в проигрывателе нет.
На старом 1ТБ RE3 (WD1002FBYS) подобных проблем за 2 года эксплуатации не наблюдалось,...
Лунатик-5SIXH
12.04.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Высокая производительность, внушительный объем.
- - По- началу стоил дороговато, в моем понятии. Но сейчас цена вполне приемлима.
Давно положил глаз на эту модель, но принципиально терпеливо выжидал пока цена снизится ниже 5 тысяч рублей.) Сейчас и у меня такой винт...
НаноПилигрим-2CIGS
29.11.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Скорость до 145 мб/сек в начале. В конце около 75. В среднем 106. Примерно две трети пространства читаются выше 100. Шум в простое неожиданно низкий.
- - При позиционировании хрустит заметно. Но это же серия Black, ему положено :)
Вполне в духе серии: работает быстро в ущерб тишине.
По сравнению с моим стареньким Seagate...
Синтрон-0AMOP
22.12.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Ёмкий, быстрый, нешумный
- - не замечено
WD 2001 FASS один из лучших винтов: ёмкий, быстрый-мой экземпляр 151,3 Мб/c в начале, 74,8 Мб/c в конце теста HD Tune.
среднее значение 120.
вибрации и нагрев...
среднее значение 120.
вибрации и нагрев...
Зета-Орион-8CZKK
29.11.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + 2тб, скорость.. и как думал надежность
как перешел на ВД ни один не подвел - - первый умер через 15 минут после вклучения...
второй работает
журчит почетче более...
Аргонавт-9BZVK
01.11.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрый, недорогой. Боюсь перехвалить, но пока вызывает положительные эмоции.
Да, гарантия 60 месяцев! - - Шумный, звук считывающих головок (при торрентах их постоянное похрюкивание...), сравнение идет с двумя WD500 Green и WD1TB Blue, стоящими рядом в боксах. Больше недостатков и нет.
Куплен за 5300, что неплохо для такого винта.
ТерраБот-7WKET
03.08.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Практически бесшумный, лишь немного шелестит во время активного использования. В условиях аномальной московской жары при температуре дома +32 градуса рабочая температура диска +42 градуса в корпусе с передним...
Плазмонавт-6MTSR
15.08.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличная модель, но он грузит не тихо
- - долгий отклик при включении компа
до этого стоял seagate baracuda 7200.11 1.5tb
но он стал сыпаться бедами...
но он стал сыпаться бедами...
Аэронавт-3JLIQ
25.06.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + ёмкий, тихий, довольно быстрый 100+МБ/сек на копировании больших файлов (обычно около 130), нормальный винт без извратов
- - не самый дешёвый вариант
Выбора...
Лунатик-4TRZY
13.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Служит уже ровно 10 лет, сейчас уже просто как запасной, но тем не менее. Думаю, этим всё сказано.
- - Со временем начал чутка громко шуметь, но шумит терпимо.
Интеллектор-3MXGM
15.01.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
WARNING: in certain RAID configurations these WD desktop series drives will frequently get flagged FAILED due to Western Digital - specific issue with TLER setting causing conflict as to whether error handling should be undertaken by the hard drive or by the RAID controller. Please parse search string "TLER" on Wikipedia for more information. Parse words like "TLER locked raid failure" (without quotes) into Google and it will return countless links to PC forum threads on this matter.Yes, I do acknowledge Western Digital, like most HDD manufacturers, does NOT endorse their desktop (non "enterprise") series drives such as the Caviar Blacks for use in RAID configurations. For RAID use, they assume the HDD will see heavy duty cycle in an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) environment, so for RAID use they push you to their much HIGHER COST drives on basis they have designed those with higher reliability (such as improved MTBF) required for enterprise duty cycles. However, home PC "enthusiasts" have generally had no significant reliability problems in using desktop series drives (from other manufactures!) to create RAIDs for typical home PC environment - assuming here home use means a VERY LOW DUTY CYCLE compared to an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) 24x7 environment.However, Western Digital has now moved from merely "advising against" to now somewhat maliciously LOCKING the TLER feature as DISABLED making the HDD INCOMPATIBLE (= very unreliable) when used in certain RAID configurations. They did this to FORCE you to use only their expensive enterprise series drives for any RAID.Western Digital burned us, sometime in late 2009, when they abruptly changed the firmware so that all versions of these drives now shipping have the Time-Limited Error Recovery (TLER) setting permanently LOCKED with TLER READ and TLER WRITE both set as DISABLED, so the WDTLER.EXE utility no longer works to toggle TLER to ENABLED. In order to use these drives in a RAID you want to set TLER to ENABLED, but you can no longer do that by any method.Western Digital never warned anyone of that firmware change, and doesn't even include a packing slip with the drive warning us these drives can no longer be used in RAID.If you dig and dig, you'll eventually find buried in obscure area of the WD website their warning:"Western Digital manufactures desktop edition hard drives and RAID Edition hard drives. Each type of hard drive is designed to work specifically in either a desktop computer environment or a demanding enterprise environment. If you install and use a desktop edition hard drive connected to a RAID controller, the drive may not work correctly...."This is reported to affect ALL of their desktop series drives (shipping late 2009, or later).With my PC, the frequency at which these drives would get dropped from my RAID was also influenced by my operating system setup. Initially, I configured my RAID using motherboard-based Intel® X58 / ICH10R with Intel Matrix Storage Manager; however, the problem was NOT that I was using such a "software motherboard-based" RAID. Apparently what made the Caviar Blacks drop from the RAID on a weekly basis was that for unrelated reasons, I had installed Vista 64-bit with a Mandarin language support configuration that for some reason prevented certain key MS updates from installing.When I did properly reload Vista so it picked up all the key updates, then the frequency of dropped drives was much lower (less then once a month) for Caviar Blacks. Plus I soon went to Windows 7 64-bit. Still there were dropped drives.So now I'll tell what completely eliminated issue of RAID mistakenly marking HDD's as FAILED due to this TLER error handling conflict:SOLUTION: I replaced all my desktop series Western Digital Caviar Blacks with Hitachi's desktop series Deskstar 7K3000, choosing the 2TB model of the 7K3000 series : HDS723020BLA642. Problem solved.And for you RAID purists who are going to flame me for using software-based RAID: yes I did eventually reconfigure for hardware RAID, in my case buying the LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8iIn closing, I'll share a very surprising Lessons-Learned I experienced in web-researching HDD reliability: the perception of HDD reliability versus manufacturer you'll get from a SURFACE browse through web forums is nearly OPPOSITE of what you'll learn from a very thorough fact-based read of objective reports on this subject.THIS is the kind of study you should read: [...]Yes, that's just one data point, but it is a VALUABLE data point because of the large sample size set of field return data. Next go surf the web and find another half dozen real world large sample studies just like that. That's what I did. What you'll find are strong CONSISITENCIES between completely unrelated independant studies in terms of how they ranked HDD manufacturers on actual real world use HDD failure rates. You parse those consistencies across those large sample studies, now you are finally cutting through the
Небулоид-5UGFO
26.07.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
UPDATE August, 2010:I am amending my review for the WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache "Firmware Rev 05.00K05" HD's tonight because I've been quietly buying masses of them from Amazon.com, a total of 60+ of them through my account and my company account since I wrote this review, into August 2010, and the packaging at Amazon.com has improved 100% in the past year, so much so that all recent HD's have been sent in new, clean, strong HD-specific boxes with "T-Mount Fittings" for HD suspension, a box within a box, with air bladders, without fail in all my recent shipments. This adequately packages the HD's for transport, and I see no reason to continue to call Amazon.com down on its shipping practices for OEM HD's, as they have learned their lessons well it turns out and remedied the shipping problems with their OEM HD's 100% in 2010.This isn't to say things couldn't be improved because they can be improved: Amazon.com could use foam inserts in the boxes to protect against static electricity and other impact damages which the hard cardboard mounting doesn't protect against, so please take note of that idea also...it is encouraging to see the good packaging, however, with all recent Western Digital Black 1TB HD shipments, and Amazon.com is to be commended for changing its ways and trying to do the customer right with adequate packing for all HD shipments in 2010, at least with my accounts it's improved to this status. This should be noted by people reading this review and others that were critical of Amazon.com packaging of OEM HD's in the past, especially 2009, a year where Amazon.com didn't fare well with criticism from most customers about their OEM HD packaging and protection during shipments.In addition there has been a post above where one person is commenting about WD changing the firmware in the OEM WD Black HD's to make them incompatible with RAID use, and that is patently false, and is NOT TO BE BELIEVED! All WD Black 1TB HD's that I have been purchasing this year, and last year, are 100% compatible with RAID arrays, any sort of RAID array, and with hardware RAID controller use, as I have built many systems this year utilizing WD Black OEM 1TB RAID setups, with and without hardware RAID controllers, and they are 100% compatible, no disclaimers necessary at all for that fact, and any claim to the contrary cannot be believed. PROVE IT TO ME if you want to publish such commentary, because up to now that whole idea is just plain uninformed, misconceived thinking, and it needs to be taken down from this web site because people will believe stupid claims like that, given the chance.Wavey Davey - August 23, 2010____ _____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___I have been waiting to review my six (6) WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache SATA 2 HD's because I wanted to establish a track record with them, a baseline, since I am using them in two distinctly different RAID mediums. In any case, the SATA HD's are working fantastic in RAID 5 and RAID 0 for me and my newest PC build. Let me digress a little and I'll rate the HD's after I tell you how I am using them.I have four (4) in a FirmTek SeriTek 2eEN4 4-Bay HotSwap RAID Enclosure as my primary "write-to" HD system for video and sound projects, in a RAID 5, so total space available in RAID 5 is 3TB. A RAID 5 uses speed and redundancy so it's an ideal medium for film or audio, as it "saves" one HD as a "spare drive" in the array, just in case of a single HD failure, and will replace that failed drive with the "saved" drive instantly so that you never lose data, or hardly ever. You'd have to have 2 HD's out of the 3 fail to lose data with RAID 5, at least in theory this is the case.The RAID 5 is connected to an Areca 1680IX-8 SAS to eSATA/SATA Hardware RAID Controller in the PC, and it's got a rudimentary installation of Vista 64-bit Ultimate on it to make it bootable, also. That's correct, I can boot the PC externally using the RAID 5 if necessary, and I do when I am building a film project from scratch if you must know the application's benefits. The RAID 5 writes at more than 405MB/sec, and reads at more than 430MB/sec with an empty volume to give you some perspective on "Hardware RAID" versus software, or system-bus RAID on an internal volume, so there is quite a benefit with the Areca 1680IX-8 controller in place.The second use for my WD Black SATA 2 HD's is as the boot system for the PC 90% of the time, as I have two (2) of the HD's mounted internally in the PC, still pushed by the Areca controller for hardware RAID 0 inside the case also. I have all of my main applications like Photoshop CS3, Illustrator 11, etc+ my web browser, Outlook, Mail, on this HD system, as it suffices to drive the PC most of the time, but for when I use the external RAID 5 and am involved in a film project. The 2TB RAID 0 (c.1.8TB formatted) gets your attention right away, as it's much faster than a system bus RAID 0 could ever be with the hardware cont
Кронос-6WEHW
12.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
WD blacks are hands down the champ of 1 TB drives for gaming and fast loads. It's not as fast as some other drives out there, but it's a great value and these drives are very reliable.
МехаРейнджер-9AVZF
10.07.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This highly advanced and high performance 2 TB Western Digital performs extremely well so far. The most unique feature of this drive is the off platter parking and locking when powered down. With this feature, the platters are not likely to suffer shock damages from the heads pounding from rough handling while being shipped. Speaking about shipping, Amazon.com as well as many other online retailer should do a better job of packaging OEM hard drives for shipping. My drive was shipped double boxed with the outer box slightly larger with an airbag pillow on one end. The inner box appear to be supplied by Western Digital with two plastic cushioning inserts on the ends and does appear to be adequate. The outer box practically does not offer any more protection from shock damages. The outer box should have been large enough to be fitted with some foam cushioning all around. The other desirable feature that this drive has is that it has dual processors and dual activators for the heads for precise tracking. The secondary activator utilizes piezoelectric technology to really fine tune in on the exact track on the platter quietly. This of course improved performance somewhat.I purchased this hard drive to use for additional storage on my computer. Because of the high-performance nature I feel this hard drive also makes an excellent boot drive for Windows. Of all the hard drive I ever purchase, it also produced the least amount of vibration when on. It's about as quiet as my Seagate hard drives. The only difference is that it makes the clunk sound occasionally when powered down when the heads park and lock. I'm paranoided from experience with my last two Seagate hard drive purchase that had growing reallocated section count shortly after placed in service. To make sure that I have a sound drive, right after installation I ran Western Digital's own Data Iifeguard For Windows to check for bad sections by running the complete surface scan. This software can be downloaded from Western Digital website. . I also ran a surface scan on this drive using HD Sentinel Pro. Both tests passed with no problems.Final thoughts: Because this Western Digital is better engineered than any of my previous hard drive, my hope is for longtime reliability. So far I'm fully impressed with the performance I have been receiving. When I ran a benchmark, the maximum read speed was almost 140 MB per second and the minimum was around 70 MB per second. Take for example when transferring files from one hard drive to another. I did an experiment on copying files on copying files from my old storage drive to my new drive. When the file is copy single file at a time the speed remains almost full of around 100 MB per second. But when I copy two files at the same time, the speed chokes down to around 25 MB per second for the two files. I try again on copying two files accept at this time, one file gets copied to the new drive and the other file is copied to my boot drive. The speed also get choked down again to around 25 MB per second for the two files. This proves in a way that the bottleneck is on my old storage drive.I tried this transferring test again except the new drive is the source this time. I copied one file to my old storage drive as well as copying another file to my boot drive at the same time. Only this time the speed remains the same on whether I copy one file or copying two or more files at the same time. The transfer speed remains close to 100 MB per second whether copying one file or two files at the same time.
Спектроник-1BFSK
20.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Works as I expected - but takes a while to wake up from sleeping. That could be because it is 2TB, or because it is the Green, low power, version. It works though and has been able to hold my media library. It is a great solution and I have been happy with it.I do wish that the warranty was longer though. 1 year just isn't quite enough that I have warm fuzzies with this drive.
Синтрон-7EDTZ
26.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I take HDD quality very seriously. It's my data at stake. WD is my drive of choice. The price is right and the quality is high. You can get drives in the WD line that will match your durability to price needs.
Гиперион-2XJFG
14.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Purchased a few years ago, had no problems since. Works fast and great space for the money. Totally would recommend on a budget build
Показаны отзывы 1-24 из 455.
Лучшие цены сегодня на Western Digital 2 ТБ WD2001FASS
График изменения цены Western Digital 2 ТБ WD2001FASS
Характеристи Western Digital 2 ТБ WD2001FASS
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
