Отзывы о Карта памяти Transcend TS*CF133
495 отзывов пользователей o Transcend TS*CF133
Пользовались
Transcend TS*CF133?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
НаноРейдер-1FTFX
27.06.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First, I am not an expert on compact flash cards. However, I use them in my photogrpahic equipment, such as a Nikon D300. I normally use the SanDisk Extreme III CF. I am concerned with two time measurements. The first is how long the CF card takes to record the image after I press the shutter release. The second is how long it takes to download the contents of my CF card to my computer using a card reader.I bought the Transcend because the record times appear to be very similar to the SanDisk, and I thought I could save some money. The Trascend was less than half of the price.The Transcend has great recording times. No complaints there. But to download data from the Transcend to my computer using a card reader takes about 8 - 10 x as long as the SanDisk. I don't know why, nor do I really care.If money is the driving factor in your purchase, and you don't care about download times, then buy the Transcend. If time is money or if you can't wait 45 - 60 minutes to download 4 GB of data from the disk to your computer via a card reader, buy the SanDisk.
НаноРейдер-1SARP
27.06.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First, I am not an expert on compact flash cards. However, I use them in my photogrpahic equipment, such as a Nikon D300. I normally use the SanDisk Extreme III CF. I am concerned with two time measurements. The first is how long the CF card takes to record the image after I press the shutter release. The second is how long it takes to download the contents of my CF card to my computer using a card reader.I bought the Transcend because the record times appear to be very similar to the SanDisk, and I thought I could save some money. The Trascend was less than half of the price.The Transcend has great recording times. No complaints there. But to download data from the Transcend to my computer using a card reader takes about 8 - 10 x as long as the SanDisk. I don't know why, nor do I really care.If money is the driving factor in your purchase, and you don't care about download times, then buy the Transcend. If time is money or if you can't wait 45 - 60 minutes to download 4 GB of data from the disk to your computer via a card reader, buy the SanDisk.
Гравитон-5SLXL
27.06.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First, I am not an expert on compact flash cards. However, I use them in my photogrpahic equipment, such as a Nikon D300. I normally use the SanDisk Extreme III CF. I am concerned with two time measurements. The first is how long the CF card takes to record the image after I press the shutter release. The second is how long it takes to download the contents of my CF card to my computer using a card reader.I bought the Transcend because the record times appear to be very similar to the SanDisk, and I thought I could save some money. The Trascend was less than half of the price.The Transcend has great recording times. No complaints there. But to download data from the Transcend to my computer using a card reader takes about 8 - 10 x as long as the SanDisk. I don't know why, nor do I really care.If money is the driving factor in your purchase, and you don't care about download times, then buy the Transcend. If time is money or if you can't wait 45 - 60 minutes to download 4 GB of data from the disk to your computer via a card reader, buy the SanDisk.
НоваГость-1ZVUA
27.06.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First, I am not an expert on compact flash cards. However, I use them in my photogrpahic equipment, such as a Nikon D300. I normally use the SanDisk Extreme III CF. I am concerned with two time measurements. The first is how long the CF card takes to record the image after I press the shutter release. The second is how long it takes to download the contents of my CF card to my computer using a card reader.I bought the Transcend because the record times appear to be very similar to the SanDisk, and I thought I could save some money. The Trascend was less than half of the price.The Transcend has great recording times. No complaints there. But to download data from the Transcend to my computer using a card reader takes about 8 - 10 x as long as the SanDisk. I don't know why, nor do I really care.If money is the driving factor in your purchase, and you don't care about download times, then buy the Transcend. If time is money or if you can't wait 45 - 60 minutes to download 4 GB of data from the disk to your computer via a card reader, buy the SanDisk.
КиберНаблюдатель-3INXY
27.06.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First, I am not an expert on compact flash cards. However, I use them in my photogrpahic equipment, such as a Nikon D300. I normally use the SanDisk Extreme III CF. I am concerned with two time measurements. The first is how long the CF card takes to record the image after I press the shutter release. The second is how long it takes to download the contents of my CF card to my computer using a card reader.I bought the Transcend because the record times appear to be very similar to the SanDisk, and I thought I could save some money. The Trascend was less than half of the price.The Transcend has great recording times. No complaints there. But to download data from the Transcend to my computer using a card reader takes about 8 - 10 x as long as the SanDisk. I don't know why, nor do I really care.If money is the driving factor in your purchase, and you don't care about download times, then buy the Transcend. If time is money or if you can't wait 45 - 60 minutes to download 4 GB of data from the disk to your computer via a card reader, buy the SanDisk.
Астрон-1RCQV
27.06.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First, I am not an expert on compact flash cards. However, I use them in my photogrpahic equipment, such as a Nikon D300. I normally use the SanDisk Extreme III CF. I am concerned with two time measurements. The first is how long the CF card takes to record the image after I press the shutter release. The second is how long it takes to download the contents of my CF card to my computer using a card reader.I bought the Transcend because the record times appear to be very similar to the SanDisk, and I thought I could save some money. The Trascend was less than half of the price.The Transcend has great recording times. No complaints there. But to download data from the Transcend to my computer using a card reader takes about 8 - 10 x as long as the SanDisk. I don't know why, nor do I really care.If money is the driving factor in your purchase, and you don't care about download times, then buy the Transcend. If time is money or if you can't wait 45 - 60 minutes to download 4 GB of data from the disk to your computer via a card reader, buy the SanDisk.
Эксопилот-5BWPQ
23.03.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The 8 GB 133x CompactFlash Memory Card is a very good product, and is better to buy it at Amazon al a lower prize that in stores.
Туманник-5PIPW
23.03.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The 8 GB 133x CompactFlash Memory Card is a very good product, and is better to buy it at Amazon al a lower prize that in stores.
Гелиос-2JOGK
30.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I use this card with my Sony A300K. This card is not the fastest card transfering pictures from the camera to the PC, but the write performance is good enough to get the camera's top 3 fps in continuous mode, which is exactly what I wanted. In summary, you won't need a more expensive card (i.e. the Extreme series from Sandisk) if you're more concern about been able to shoot fast than to read fast.
Альфа-Юнит-9TOZD
21.12.2008
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this card to store my mp3 files in order to free up space on my Laptop's hard drive. Unfortunately, I can't even play the files with Windows Media Player from this device. The music is slow and choppy and sometimes stops altogether. Sync times are also horrendous - Not nearly as fast as SD cards that I have. The large size is nice, but performance limitations severly limit the usability of this card.
Спектр-1MSRQ
21.12.2008
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this card to store my mp3 files in order to free up space on my Laptop's hard drive. Unfortunately, I can't even play the files with Windows Media Player from this device. The music is slow and choppy and sometimes stops altogether. Sync times are also horrendous - Not nearly as fast as SD cards that I have. The large size is nice, but performance limitations severly limit the usability of this card.
Кварковец-7VTGI
21.12.2008
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this card to store my mp3 files in order to free up space on my Laptop's hard drive. Unfortunately, I can't even play the files with Windows Media Player from this device. The music is slow and choppy and sometimes stops altogether. Sync times are also horrendous - Not nearly as fast as SD cards that I have. The large size is nice, but performance limitations severly limit the usability of this card.
Синтрон-0YUWU
07.01.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this card because I was going on a trip and didn't want to keep up with my DSLR and Laptop while navigating some very busy airports. The extra memory was perfect. The card is a bit slower than my older 4GB card, though, which was a bit disappointing since this is touted as being "fast". However, I do recommend this item.
Сириус-6GIWP
19.03.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I use this compact flash card with the Canon 20D. I picked this particular brand because of its price. It's frustrating to pay top dollar for new technology only to have something faster and large storage capacity come out at a cheaper price is a relatively short time.The Transcend 4GB card didn't disappoint. I tried it just a few days after receiving it at a track and field event at the local high school. The amount of photos this card will hold will depend upon your camera settings and on the ISO level you set your camera to. (The lower the ISO or light sensitivity setting the smaller the file size.)The card performed well and one must remember that card speed is only half of the equation. Your camera's internal buffer also plays a role. I had been using an 80x speed card and this particular card I'm reviewing is a 133x speed. I didn't notice that much of a difference in terms of writing time to my card while using the shutter and I think I was faced with a buffer issue. I was taking continous shots of hurdle jumpers and long jumpers and taking as many photos per second as the camera could handle. It was nice having a large card to handle all the photos and not have to worrying about swapping cards.I think this card is a terrific deal and I think I will get another!
Интеллектор-8SDIO
19.03.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I use this compact flash card with the Canon 20D. I picked this particular brand because of its price. It's frustrating to pay top dollar for new technology only to have something faster and large storage capacity come out at a cheaper price is a relatively short time.The Transcend 4GB card didn't disappoint. I tried it just a few days after receiving it at a track and field event at the local high school. The amount of photos this card will hold will depend upon your camera settings and on the ISO level you set your camera to. (The lower the ISO or light sensitivity setting the smaller the file size.)The card performed well and one must remember that card speed is only half of the equation. Your camera's internal buffer also plays a role. I had been using an 80x speed card and this particular card I'm reviewing is a 133x speed. I didn't notice that much of a difference in terms of writing time to my card while using the shutter and I think I was faced with a buffer issue. I was taking continous shots of hurdle jumpers and long jumpers and taking as many photos per second as the camera could handle. It was nice having a large card to handle all the photos and not have to worrying about swapping cards.I think this card is a terrific deal and I think I will get another!
НаноРейдер-0PSJT
19.03.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I use this compact flash card with the Canon 20D. I picked this particular brand because of its price. It's frustrating to pay top dollar for new technology only to have something faster and large storage capacity come out at a cheaper price is a relatively short time.The Transcend 4GB card didn't disappoint. I tried it just a few days after receiving it at a track and field event at the local high school. The amount of photos this card will hold will depend upon your camera settings and on the ISO level you set your camera to. (The lower the ISO or light sensitivity setting the smaller the file size.)The card performed well and one must remember that card speed is only half of the equation. Your camera's internal buffer also plays a role. I had been using an 80x speed card and this particular card I'm reviewing is a 133x speed. I didn't notice that much of a difference in terms of writing time to my card while using the shutter and I think I was faced with a buffer issue. I was taking continous shots of hurdle jumpers and long jumpers and taking as many photos per second as the camera could handle. It was nice having a large card to handle all the photos and not have to worrying about swapping cards.I think this card is a terrific deal and I think I will get another!
Гиперион-9CALS
19.03.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I use this compact flash card with the Canon 20D. I picked this particular brand because of its price. It's frustrating to pay top dollar for new technology only to have something faster and large storage capacity come out at a cheaper price is a relatively short time.The Transcend 4GB card didn't disappoint. I tried it just a few days after receiving it at a track and field event at the local high school. The amount of photos this card will hold will depend upon your camera settings and on the ISO level you set your camera to. (The lower the ISO or light sensitivity setting the smaller the file size.)The card performed well and one must remember that card speed is only half of the equation. Your camera's internal buffer also plays a role. I had been using an 80x speed card and this particular card I'm reviewing is a 133x speed. I didn't notice that much of a difference in terms of writing time to my card while using the shutter and I think I was faced with a buffer issue. I was taking continous shots of hurdle jumpers and long jumpers and taking as many photos per second as the camera could handle. It was nice having a large card to handle all the photos and not have to worrying about swapping cards.I think this card is a terrific deal and I think I will get another!
Зета-Орион-3PDGZ
19.03.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I use this compact flash card with the Canon 20D. I picked this particular brand because of its price. It's frustrating to pay top dollar for new technology only to have something faster and large storage capacity come out at a cheaper price is a relatively short time.The Transcend 4GB card didn't disappoint. I tried it just a few days after receiving it at a track and field event at the local high school. The amount of photos this card will hold will depend upon your camera settings and on the ISO level you set your camera to. (The lower the ISO or light sensitivity setting the smaller the file size.)The card performed well and one must remember that card speed is only half of the equation. Your camera's internal buffer also plays a role. I had been using an 80x speed card and this particular card I'm reviewing is a 133x speed. I didn't notice that much of a difference in terms of writing time to my card while using the shutter and I think I was faced with a buffer issue. I was taking continous shots of hurdle jumpers and long jumpers and taking as many photos per second as the camera could handle. It was nice having a large card to handle all the photos and not have to worrying about swapping cards.I think this card is a terrific deal and I think I will get another!
ИнфраГость-7ESUO
19.03.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I use this compact flash card with the Canon 20D. I picked this particular brand because of its price. It's frustrating to pay top dollar for new technology only to have something faster and large storage capacity come out at a cheaper price is a relatively short time.The Transcend 4GB card didn't disappoint. I tried it just a few days after receiving it at a track and field event at the local high school. The amount of photos this card will hold will depend upon your camera settings and on the ISO level you set your camera to. (The lower the ISO or light sensitivity setting the smaller the file size.)The card performed well and one must remember that card speed is only half of the equation. Your camera's internal buffer also plays a role. I had been using an 80x speed card and this particular card I'm reviewing is a 133x speed. I didn't notice that much of a difference in terms of writing time to my card while using the shutter and I think I was faced with a buffer issue. I was taking continous shots of hurdle jumpers and long jumpers and taking as many photos per second as the camera could handle. It was nice having a large card to handle all the photos and not have to worrying about swapping cards.I think this card is a terrific deal and I think I will get another!
Нейрон-8ARFD
06.01.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This item works well in my Olympus 7070. With the large memory capacity, it allows me to take underwater movies with less energy consumption than my microdrives, so I do not need to replace the battery as often during multiple dives. It connected easily to my camera's processor.
Зета-Орион-6GJTL
22.09.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the Transcend 32 GB card thru Amazon.com several months ago to use as an extra hard drive for my Samsung Q1 SSD. This would give me 64 GB in the two (one enclosed) solid state memory drives. I choose the CF type card instead of the better, faster SD HC card because the Samsung Q1 has a CF slot where the card can be kept without protrusion. However, I found the Transcend 32 GB drive to be much too slow to work as a hard drive. I cannot play movies from the drive and cannot even play music from the drive without distortion because of its slow speed. Hopefully there are/will be much faster CF 32 GB cards available.
ТерраБот-2USJO
22.09.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the Transcend 32 GB card thru Amazon.com several months ago to use as an extra hard drive for my Samsung Q1 SSD. This would give me 64 GB in the two (one enclosed) solid state memory drives. I choose the CF type card instead of the better, faster SD HC card because the Samsung Q1 has a CF slot where the card can be kept without protrusion. However, I found the Transcend 32 GB drive to be much too slow to work as a hard drive. I cannot play movies from the drive and cannot even play music from the drive without distortion because of its slow speed. Hopefully there are/will be much faster CF 32 GB cards available.
МехаРейнджер-1CYKJ
22.09.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the Transcend 32 GB card thru Amazon.com several months ago to use as an extra hard drive for my Samsung Q1 SSD. This would give me 64 GB in the two (one enclosed) solid state memory drives. I choose the CF type card instead of the better, faster SD HC card because the Samsung Q1 has a CF slot where the card can be kept without protrusion. However, I found the Transcend 32 GB drive to be much too slow to work as a hard drive. I cannot play movies from the drive and cannot even play music from the drive without distortion because of its slow speed. Hopefully there are/will be much faster CF 32 GB cards available.
Синтрон-3OLRP
31.12.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
So it's not the fastest card, but for the price this was a nice memory card.By this time you can get better deals, but this card has served me well and has been very reliable. Nothings worse than finding corrupt data from a memory card, never happened with this card.
Показаны отзывы 337-360 из 495.
