Отзывы о Жесткий диск Seagate Barracuda 1 ТБ ST31000528AS
 | Жесткий диск Seagate Barracuda 1 ТБ ST31000528AS | Яндекс Маркет | от 7 580 ₽ | Посмотреть |
668 отзывов пользователей o Seagate Barracuda 1 ТБ ST31000528AS
Пользовались
Seagate Barracuda 1 ТБ ST31000528AS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Гравитон-0KTYS
03.12.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Bought this in spring of 2010, only to have it completely fail by fall 2010. Apparently the 7200 series has known issues. It failed to back up any of my files before it stopped working completely after about 6 months. I lost tons of photos and documents that I thought were backed up. Company offers no help with data retrieval, which starts at a cost of about $1600.I'll never make the mistake of buying anything by Seagate again.
Гиперион-0BJPY
27.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this drive to be an internal drive in my Mac Pro. I installed it, formatted it, and I have been using it ever since. I purchased it in late 2010, and I will attempt to update this review if I run into any problems. So far, so good.
Сириус-6BLEG
22.06.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Bought 2 of these for use in a Synology NAS. One of 2 dead in about 2 months. After 2 months operating fine, got an error that the drive array was compromised by Synology OS. Was able to resync the bad drive back into the mirror array, worked ok for a couple days, then a loud clicking from the same drive.Fortunately the drive is under Seagate warranty, but dead in 2 months? The Synology NAS is on a UPS and only used for backups of 2 PCs so it does not receive power spikes, nor is it heavily used. The Seagate on-line return process is fairly painless, but who keeps original packaging after 2 months? Not me! Seagate makes you very carefully package the returned product or they can refuse the warranty replacement. I have a feeling the other original drive may die as well. I'll be sure to keep the packaging from the first replacement drive.Thank goodness I was using the Synology device that caught the error and will allow me to resync the data to the new drive once it arrives.
НаноРейдер-1GXPD
14.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Good buy even though it is odd size storage (1.5 GB) compared to 1.0 or 2.0 GB. Put in my security system and has not missed a thing. Great buy for the amount of storage.
Синтрон-3IVCE
28.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Not the fastest, but it is dependable. It matches my desktop's existing HD enabling me to upgrade the storage to RAID 1
Квантум-1ATQR
14.12.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased two of these drives and they were shipped as lose items in an over-sized box with minimal air pacs for padding. The pair of drives had no packaging other then the anti-static bags, they were just lose so they could bang into each other all the way to my house. The anti-static bags had holes in them from where the hard drives smash against each other while in transit.
Плазмоид-9NCXL
13.12.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased this drive on November 11, 2009 for use with my Netgear NAS. As I write this, I've owned the drive for about a month and it has performed fine so far - no reallocated or bad sectors, etc. However, periodically I notice it making two clicks in a row - "click, click". Not sure if this is due to its being in the NAS - as opposed to installed in a computer - or what, but it seems to perform fine otherwise and the health logs in my NAS do not indicate any issues at all. The clicking is not constant, so perhaps it is because the drive is syncing with the other one or something....who knows. If the drive does fail, well, my data is mirrored onto the other drive on my NAS and backed up to two separate external USB drives AND backed up onto my netbook, and then I guess I'll deal with Seagate's warranty.With technology, you cannot have too much redundancy. :-)I purchased this drive because it is on the ReadyNAS compatible hardware list and the Seagates seemed to have fewer issues than the Western Digital drives.As far as performance, well, it seems just fine. My NAS came with a 500GB drive from the factory, and I believe it too was a Seagate. I've noticed no significant performance difference at all since installing the drive, so I'm happy as my NAS was performing fine before this drive. I'd wager a bet that performance will be more directly and noticeably affected by what interface you are using to connect to the drive, rather than the drive itself.For what it's worth, I had a 1TB USB Western Digital that I was using prior to my purchasing the NAS, and it never gave me any problems during the year I owned it.
Вояджер-0DTHG
13.10.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This drive was rated by some of the PC enthusiast magazines as one of the better SATA drives. Very fast. I purchased this to replace my IDE drive that was no longer compatible with my replacement mobo. Very fast and quiet. I can't hear the HDD clicking in my case and I have silent 120 mm fans. Great purchase and well worth the price for most users. Word to the wise. If you are looking to use this as RAID0 boot partition, Windows will not support a boot partition greater than 2TB. So, if you're buying this drive for RAID0 on a windows boot drive, buy the 1TB size or smaller.
Гравитон-8CYWR
10.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Have had this OEM Seagate Barracuda 1TB for a couple months now, and no problem so far.Shipped with good enough packaging from Amazon. The packaging is only a box with two support at both ends of HD to hold it in place.Fortunately mine works without any problem when it arrives.
Фотон-0VQSB
20.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I slapped this baby inside my system and it's worked without problems now for several months. I hope this continues for years to come.
Гравитон-9LILZ
18.11.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Came home and unboxed the drive, installed it and proceeded to use the Seagate Disc Wizard (Windows takes longer IMHO) and had an Internal Exception Error: "Object handle is not registered. (0x120023)". Ok so I used Windows 7 Manager to format as NTFS (tried Full and Quick) and comes up with an error that it could not be formatted. Sent this one back, hopefully I will get the next one in a couple days to see if this replacement drive is any better.
ОмниКод-7LWHD
14.02.2011
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought one, it died a week after installation, received the replacement, it died as well, asked for my money back and bought a different one.
Астрономад-9BPHY
09.08.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
As the title of the review says, this is an excellent product at an excellent price. By "this" I mean the 1TB Seagate model "ST31000528AS-Bare Drive" which I bought here about two weeks ago for $70 and free shipping.Amazon lumps the reviews of all Seagate hard drives together. If there are differences in the quality and reliability of various models, it's hard to tell from reviews and the averaged ratings. I don't like this policy but there's not much I can do about it.Several of the reviews here complain about reliability of certain other models of Seagate drives. As you read those, beware that they may be irrelevant to the specific model that you are about to purchase.As I said, the model ST31000528AS works perfectly. It is fast, noiseless, and a steal at the offered price.
Квантум-4OAZS
10.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This product is everything you'd want in a drive. Quiet, and it holds tons of stuff.Having had it less than a month, it's premature to speak of reliability; however, I've purchased many Seagate drives at work over the years, and they make a good product.
Синтрон-4QIST
10.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Create drive at a great price. Be sure you have latest firmware from Seagate, mine already had the latest firmware and installed with no problems.
Квазар-7HHZM
17.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Being a commercial photographer looking for a better way to archive, I asked a University of Kentucky Engineering professor for his opinion on hard drive brands. "Seagate" was his one and only response. So far, he's right on.
Гравитон-7LNQU
24.01.2011
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this hard drive at the end of October 2010, and as of January 2011 it is dead, having conveniently waiting to die after the 30 day return window had elapsed. Thank-you, Seagate, for nothing.
Капеллан-5GHZH
27.09.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased a ST31000528AS 1TB Seagate hard drive and the drive had poor packing inside the box. The drive was just sliding around in the box. Naturally 12 days from receiving the drive from Amazon the drive has to be RMA to Seagate. The drive would lockup in Vista, I would reset the computer and receive no hard drive detected. I had to Power down the computer wait 30 seconds then power back on to get the drive to detect. Ran Seatools diagnostic software from Seagate and the drive failed both Short and Long DST tests. with error code A4E7EA58. I will not purchase another hard drive from Amazon.
Дроид-6IFBN
19.12.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I should have paid more attention to the reviews. I have a Windows Vista machine and installed and formatted the hard drive. I received an error and then spent time researching how to fix it. I finally gave up, returned the drive and got a Western Digital. It installed and formatted perfectly on the first try WD1001FALS.
Странник-7AEZT
07.12.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Both units arrived in a timely fashion and were solid right out of the very solid packaging. We needed a little room to move some parts of a server file system around with externalizing everything. The 250s and a simple raid controller did the trick. Units were prepacked in Seagate shipping boxes which can be re-used for warranty shipments of any hard disk.
Нейрон-2XMUH
22.11.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
The reason for this purchase is all the SMART errors I was getting when using these drives in my ReadyNAS raid array. I though I was getting enterprise reliability but two (of the four) of the drives have growing SMART error counts already, not what I expected. I'm in the processes of testing the drives using the SeaTools to determine if I need to do the RMA. I do have better things to spend my time on ...
Вояджер-1KMWG
22.01.2011
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Got this drive on a lightning deal in sept. Just tried to install it and it was doa. Seagate does not recognize the serial number/model number for warrantee, and it's past 30 days for amazon return.
Туманник-2SLCS
29.11.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
This drive is advertised as NEW. It obviously came out of an Apple computer which makes it USED. It suffered catastrophic failure and is NOT supported by Seagate because it is OEM, and only the OEM buyer can deal with Seagate. I have attempted to contact the seller twice now without receiving a reply. This seller should be banned fromAmazon because of Fraud and Deception.
Аэронавт-5NKVS
18.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
There is much discuasion of the performance of this drive when used in RAID arrays. [...] The drive that notably beat the Seagate was the WD RE3. The real competition for the Seagate is the WD Caviar Black which the drive met or beat on virtually every test.Some background info:Both the 1Tb WD Black and the Seagate 1.5Tb had an issue with long "timeouts" caused by the drives "self-standardization" or "cache-flushing" (I'm not SURE of the technical details) at intervals. This "off-line" appearance of the drives caused the drive to a) drop out of the RAID configuration b) be "ejected" from the array due to "read/write errors" c) "hang" for up to 30 seconds or so. Needless to say, these cause major problems in the speed and efficiency of the RAID arrays.The most important thing to note is the major difference in corporate response to the using the drives in RAID arrays. I don't have the exact quote, but WD pretty much said "the Black is not approved for RAID use and will not be supported in this application. Use the RE3 drives". This varies MARKEDLY in the response of SEAGATE which was to work with users and issue firmware patches to meet customer expectatioins. The response of WD on this issue was, imho, unforgivable.. I mean its true that the drives, if applied to a true corporate environment RAID array which has very severe throughput and percent utilization challenges, is a special case. However, for home users, probably 90% of new motherboards contain SATA RAID options built in. For this reason combined with the great prices on HD's now encourage MANY MANY home users to begin using RAID configurations on their home setups. By any stretch of the imagination drives used this way get no more severe utilization than the same drives used in a single drive configuration.[b]Huge KUDO's go to SEAGATE[/b] for the way in which they have tried to support this 1.5 Tb drive while WD needs to have their ears pinned back for their "corporate speak" response to this issue. The RE3 is, on a cost per Gb basis, about 2.25 times the cost of the Seagate 1.5Tb. The 1Tb Caviar Black is the "comparable" drive (still somewhat more expensive $/Gb than this Seagate) and it isn't supported by WD in a RAID array!!! Pffft on WD!PS: I am a long time user of both brands of drives and previously was slightly biased toward WD.. but this incident weighs on my mind considerably(edit added) To summarize:Seagate 1.5Tb approx cost /Gb 0.085 .. RAID supported (need updates)WD Black 1.0Tb approx cost /Gb 0.120 .. Not supported in RAIDWD RE3 1.0Tb approx cost /Gb 0.180 .. Certified for RAIDAll have 5yr warranties, and based on my past experience (I've not had a failure with any of these drives) their warranty services are very good. But if you're having RAID application issues with the WD Black, you won't get support.
Показаны отзывы 313-336 из 668.
