Отзывы о Умные часы Polar Vantage M2
192 отзывов пользователей o Polar Vantage M2
Пользовались
Polar Vantage M2?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Before starting a session, you find the corresponding exercise in the watch and hit a button to start recording. WIth the Vantage you get a colour screen dispaly that shows you feedback on your heart rate, pace, distance etc, but I found that the dispaly can be customised to suit your needs, so when running I just have the heart rate zones showing so I know which zone I should be in to get the most out of my session. I don't like running in my glasses, and with my previous watch I struggled to see the display, but this is not an issue with the Vantage. Once you've finished you stop the recording and then sync the watch with the app. The level of detail and feedback within the app is great, and I can already see via the feedback analysis that I'm getting fitter as my predicted finish time is getting better. I can see even more detail by going into my Polar flow account online on my laptop, the re-live feature is particulary nice.
Some of the exercises in my diary are stretching or body resistance routines, for those I get to follow a video of a person demonstrating the exercises via the app, so I can follow in real time ensuring I get the correct form and timing -it's like having your own personal trainer in your phone.
I don't just enjoy running though, I like walking, swimming, bike riding and hiking too. The watch stores 20 different sport profiles, but there are many more to choose from within the app, I'd say over 100, but I've not tried counting them all yet.
I'm really enjoying all the features and with the recent software update I got a few more. Hopefully the training will keep me on track for a persoanl best in my half marathon.
I’m still very apprehensive about the continuous HR tracking and will always exercise with the HR monitor that you can buy extra. I do not pay attention to total calories burned really because I just don’t really understand how they’re working that out. Because it gets to a very high number. Obviously not all is active calories but I feel it would be much better to be like the Apple Watch regarding active and non active calories.
The sleep tracking is also not particularly accurate. Which I know from nights where it has taken me a while to get to sleep and I’ve looked at the time. The next day my sleep data said I was deep asleep when I was in fact very wide awake at that time.
The ANS charge also goes through phases where it just won’t work, the longest being 4/5 consecutive nights.
The battery is very good. But keep in mind if you’re wearing it for long treks 10 hours or so the battery will be rinsed and only last about 2 days.
I enjoy the way it records activities and the lay out for runs is good. My friend has a garmin and she much preferred the lay out to the polar.
I also don’t like the cardio load which tells you if you are maintaining or detraining etc. Sometimes you can miss one day after training solidly and it tells you you’re detraining. Which seems odd to me. And a bit unfair sometimes!! It’s almost promoting sort of ridiculous training just to be productive which may not be healthy for some people. I feel if you’ve suffered with disordered eating/over training/orthorexia, I wouldn’t recommend the watch.
Part of me wishes I just got an Apple Watch. But then I hear about the awful battery and it doesn’t track sleep. So part of me doesn’t. Sometimes I’m happy with this watch, sometimes I’m not.
I feel there is better out there but for the time being this is doing the job as I mainly just want it for recording exercises and steps etc.
Not sure it’s worth the price tag however with all the negatives/problems stated above. I thought I did my research but guess you never really know till you buy and wear for a period of time.
Have a few mixed feelings.
Positives:
- nice design with copper colour
- quick set up
- accurate on distance and map
- many options and features
- very good battery, with 24/7 HR off last for about week with 5 (8hrs) sessions
- quickly finding a GPS signal
- possibility of personalising screens for sessions are brilliant
- HR monitor accurate
Negatives:
- Down button doesn’t want to work randomly
- sync random problems, have to restart watch few times to connect it back to iPhone 11, just can’t see each other on occasions
- sometimes screen spontaneously skips to different sports when trying to turn on the training
- digits could be more apparent, M400 had much bigger and readable
- on the lap summary can’t see the average pace for the lap
- no option for personalisation of the lap summary screen
Watch, Polar Flow app & iPhone are always up to date.
Tried twice hard reset for above issues but remains.
The HRM in good for walking but not cycling.
Can be coupled to H10 chest strap that should give accurate HR.
I generally train around 5 days a week with a mix of running, weights, rowing (water and machine) and I've found the extra data useful and interesting. I quite like the design of the watch as well, which I think looks quite sleek compared with some of the garmin ones, which swung me towards polar when buying. In terms of the accuracy, I tend to use a HR monitor when I'm trying to stick to a zone for training, so haven't noticed a massive issue with accuracy as when just using the watch I'm OK with being given a more general idea of where my HR is.
However, I've had a few issues with the watch syncing with the app to download data - it can take a few attempts to get the watch to even start syncing, and then a really long time (over half an hour) for the watch to sync and data to show up on my phone. I've also had an issue with some sessions going missing, especially when the battery gets a little low. I also find using the watch can be a bit clunky - it doesn't automatically recognise when you're training and remembering to start and stop the watch can be a bit annoying. I was also a bit disappointed with the recovery data - it seems to give you more general feedback than I was expecting, as I know some other watches give you specific estimated recovery advice which I would have liked.
I've preciously had a fitbit charge, but aside from that have nothing to compare this to really, so not massively disappointed as this is my first 'expensive' sports watch, but will probably look for something different in the future.
Having seen my friends/colleagues using GPS watches for their activities and curious to see if it will make my training life easier, I was having a look around and decided to try this Polar Vantage M. So unfortunately I have no other predecessors or other brands to compare it to but so far, having used it for around a month, I am very happy with it!
What's new to my training is the Polar Flow and the Personal Training regime it offers with videos as well as being able to analyze my daily activities with the heart rate monitoring. The way it assesses your training load is great and keeps you motivated to try and maintain your fitness. It even has a Field Hockey tracking mode!! It's light weight, compact and I happily wear it with some wrist sweatband coverage (for protection) when I play Hockey and seems to do a great job.
I have noted the other reviews comparing it to other GPS watches. However I can say, here is one happy customer who is hopefully utilizing it's potential to the max. Not hugely fancy but I feel it's ticked all my boxes.
To give some context, this year I've used a Garmin Fenix 5 Plus, Fitbit Surge, Amazfit Stratos paired with a Wahoo Tickr, and now the Polar Vantage M. So far, I've found the Fitbit Surge the best for me on wrist based tracking - the Fenix never managed to track sleep and over-estimated my readings when flat out by about 10 beats per minute. The Fitbit Surge tracks sleep superbly, and the gets my resting heart rate and running heart rate spot on. Its less good with cycling. The Amazfit Stratos optical heart rate sensor is hopeless apart from with resting heart rate, where its excellent. So I have a few sports watches + external monitor to compare with.
As a test I did a 20 kilomater (13 mile) cycle ride around the Lake District area, deliberately adding a set of hill climb intervals. With the intervals in particularly the Polar M simply failed to track the variations in heart rate from the expected increase on the climbs, to the decrease on descents. Instead I saw a steadily increasing curve with no peaks and dips as you'd expect with intervals. The other sports watch with external heart rate monitor naturally tracked the heart rate transistions perfectly.
I think the message here is that if you don't have an accurate external heart rate monitor to compare with the Vantage M, you might think the optical sensor in the Vantage M is doing a good job - but interval training with short bursts of activity, rest then start again several times is a real test of an optical heart rate sensor - and it simply does not measure up. As always firmware updates my fix this, but we are now into 6 months of production, so generally at this point I'd assume its a hardware issue (ie poor build in heart rate monitor) and its unlikely this will be solved down the line.
Battery life - I only charge it once a week, which is perfect for me, as I run 5 says a week and feel like I am constantly plugged into some charger or other.
GPS - takes a little while to connect but no more than a minute, never showed an incorrect recording or map so far.
HR - wrist based heart rates are sometimes a little dodge but so far it seems to have served me well. I have manually inputted my HR zones as they were too long for peak performance and they work for me much better now.
Ease of us - menus are easy to navigate. I know there was a bit of feedback that the buttons are slippy, but I've never had an issue whilst running. I actually find it easier to use than my previous touch screen which disliked cold or sweaty hands!
Polar flow/cardio load - I'm an absolute data junkie and the app/desktop site is amazing for getting all my stats through on. Cardio load is really handy for monitoring your current strain.
For me it does everything I nee it to, at a cheaper price than the equivalent Garmin.
So I was very eager to purchase the new Polar Vantage M, primarily because Polar claimed that their new Fusion heart rate technology was very accurate and a big improvement over their previous technology used in their older products. Not so, at least, for me. All weekend, I tested the accuracy of its heart rate technology, or lack of it. The heart rate drop outs were just as bad as those I experienced with the M430s. I tried moving the Polar Vantage up and down my forearm, sometimes lower than my wrist bone, then in small incremements higher towards my elbow, as far as the last hole on the wrist strap would allow. The heart rate readings still fluctuated considerably throughout my workout, despite relaxing my wrist and maintaining the same level of exercise exertion. I tried loosening and tightening the watch at various points on my arm. No change in the rapidly and wildly fluctuating bpm readings, again, even as I kept the exercises at a constant rate and effort. Furthermore, I do not have any adverse heart conditions which might lead to inaccurate heart rate readings.
I am very disappointed, and I do not feel like talking about the other features of the watch because the so-called Fusion technology was my main reason for purchasing it. I would add that even during rest periods, i.e., just sitting down and stationary, the Polar Vantage bpm readings jumped rapidly up and down from 70 to 90 bpm. So no consistency there, either.
I do not intend to purchase any more heart rate watches. Polar products have put me off. (As for the Polar Scale, it works, but you can buy a body weight scale with similar specs for a fraction of the cost.) Instead, and considering that the Polar OH1 malfunctioned, I will now try another brand of heart rate straps which can be worn on the upper arm, such as the Scosche Rhythm, in the hope that it will prove more reliable than the Polar OH1 and provide accurate heart rate readings during exercise.
For those looking to buy this watch in order to obtain accurate heart rate readings during exercise, or even at rest, be prepared to be utterly disappointed. (Or, you may get lucky.)
- When I run or walk my heart rate accuracy isn't great, about 20-30bpm higher than registering on a heart rate belt worn at the same time. Curiously it is much more accurate when cycling.
- Enable ANT+ as Polar has already done on a couple of its belts; this would allow me to connect my Wattbike and HR belt to the watch whilst using Zwift.
- Pool swimming seems accurate but please reduce the minimum pool length - 20m isn't short enough.
But overall a really good watch.
Sport wise I have used this in the sea for swimming and windsurfing and definitely still works as it should. Love this watch.
But other than that, you can't fault this watch! It gets the job done, and Polar Flow has been so useful for me in improving my running fitness. All black looks stylish in all settings, I've worn this with my suit and it's very nice. Versatile no matter what I'm wearing.
Doesn’t sync automatically each time I need to pair it with the phone !! Don’t know whom should I reach to fix it
I was used to have a RC3 GPS.
Pros > Got a lot of sports and you can change the way you see the time. The GPS works very quickly and you can monitor your heart rate every time. Also has a sleep meassurement.
Cons > The heart rate is not accurate. Really bad one. I was running at 4:00 per KM and my heart rate was 118 which is really very low. Also, you can not change the view of the sports. On RC3 GPS you could select what you want to see.
Anyway is a nice watch, but no accurate on the heart rate.
Multiple modes allow you to track all sorts of training from running to swimming, walking to skiing.
The in-built training plan calculator lets you plan your training year in blocks to ensure you get the most out of your sessions.
Would recommend to any athlete from beginner to pro.
My one criticism, it doesn't pick up a high heart rate. I often hit 190+ bpm when training but the watch claims I'm only reaching 160bpm. Can easily be resolved by wearing the chest strap heart monitor that syncs with the watch.
Overall, I would throughly recommended this to anyone.






