Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D800 Body
618 отзывов пользователей o Nikon D800 Body
Пользовались
Nikon D800 Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Гаврилюк Егор
02.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Удобно расположены все, абсолютно все кнопки. Как-то со временем приходишь к выводу, что это чуть ли не самое важное в аппарате. Смотреть фотки удобно. Удалять - удобно. Зумить - удобно. Переключатель Lv удобный. Кнопка справки, кнопка фокусировки, переключать on/off. Возможно, если сравнивать с тем же Кэнон, то не очень удобно переключать ISO одной рукой. И Wb. На Кэнон МОЖНО сделать это одной рукой. На Никон это весьма принципиально нельзя сделать одной рукой. А это иногда полезно, когда, например, во второй руке вспышка.
Далее качество картинки. Скажу честно, мне очень нравится то, что можно получить в фотошопе/raw-конверторе из Никоновских равов. Можно тянуть тени, тянуть света, крутить цветЫ, и тд. Но при этом, на мой взгляд jpeg файлы у Nikon. Цветопередача крайне своеобразная. Фотоаппарат очень любит цеплять паразитных оттенков, от листвы, от ламп, от чего угодно. В этом плане очень полярно: шикарные raw, никакие jpeg. Возможно, субъективно, но так всегда.
Из последнего, пожалуй, ISO. На мой взгляд, ISO6400 рабочее и ещё как. Если не обрабатывать фотографии, то у 5d3 дела получше. Если обрабатывать - наоборот. Так как детализация на 36Мп поширше, а ДД тоже, то потом можно многое получить...
Скроменый эксперт
31.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I been a Nikon user now for over 20 years, I have a D700 for over 4 years and a few other Nikon Digital cameras I use at times. I finally sold my faithful F100 film camera after buying the D700. Needless to say up until recently I use the D700 almost on every outing; and love it - it is a wonderful camera that does a fantastic job at digital photography.Now I have a D800! So the first thing I notice is the layout and build difference; the D800 is not as ergonomic and slightly smaller bodiedThe build materials of the D800 are of similar composition as compared to the D700 but the D700 feels solid and less plastic than the D800.Overall, it does not take too much time to get use to the new layout as most buttons and dials are similarly placed ad do the same functions.Image quality of the D800 is for most all circumstances remarkable and this comes at the cost of larger file sizes.-- Media management becomes critical when your talking about 38mb + per shot - your storage solution and backup plans need to keep up with the file size increase.The benefit of larger resolution is you have better cropping options. Meaning, photos can be zoomed in to show more details.The main feature I was looking for with this camera was to use it for my Macro (MICRO) photography - bugs and plants, so having more resolution is better.I decided to go with the D800 vice D800E after many months of research, the simply fact is not that much difference between the two and I simply don't want to deal with the moire issues.Not that the D800E has Moire issues, I simply don't wish to increase my probability of running across subjects that would create moire. I will stick with the D800 for now.Things I worry about as an outdoor photographer - DUST. With a sensor now having this many pixels packed on. It would be obvious to deduct dust would be more of a problem.Good thing - if you are using Nikon pro lens they have a weather seal where it attaches to the camera, and the camera itself is moisture and dust resistant. Time will tell.Movie Mode: This has been around for awhile, and the D800 has some nice features with many shooting modes to choose from, such as 24 frames for that indie look. The movie features are comparable to any of the other PRO DSLRs out there just youtube it. The D800 has continuous focus and supports external mic in and does a great job with movie production.Overall I am pleased with the D800 Camera and the initial performance.Unlike others I don't put a camera under a microscope and go looking for defects unless a problem impacts my shooting, then I look for the root cause and have it addressed. So far I don't see any issues, focus or otherwise.Finally, I appreciate the ability to set up a "My Menu" in the camera; with the press on on button I can go direct to my menu to make changes to some of my favorite settings without having to go to the main menu and drill into sub menus. Overall the menu system works pretty well and things are laid out reasonably well + you can re-program buttons to perform other functions.Now for the whining;The D800 is a great camera for those that can afford it, and had the D4 offered more resolution (24mp) I would have invested in that over the D800.I do feel the D800 is about $800.00 over priced as are all the pro level Nikon cameras, but people don't want their older Nikon cameras devalued so Nikon keeps trucking along with overpricing.
Скроменый эксперт
13.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The features and performance of the D800 is unsurpassed in my opinion. Very very good camera. Very happy with the resolution. You can virtually crop to the smallest detail ( in RAW format ) without fear of losing detail. Beware of two major points: 1)Get a large memory card when shooting in RAW. Some images for me have exceeded 50MB plus. I have carried at least three cards of 64GB when travelling. On a recent two week trip overseas I shot through three cards without so much as blinking. Came within 20 images of running out of memory at the end of the trip. That was over 1200 plus images for me at the time.Also beware of something more troublesome, however from a maintenance standpoint. You may see this in other reviews as well. Don't know if this is unique to Nikon or not. There appears to be an "over-lubrication" of the shutter mechanism on this camera, maybe other Nikons as well, though my D7000 does not exhibit this issue. You will see the results in your images with small annoying dark grey specks or dots on your images. This is not dirt but oil droplets. The "splatter" of the excess oil shows up due to lodging onto the sensor. These will NOT "blow" off or clean off with the camera self-cleaning feature. They have to be removed with sensor cleaning. Will get worse as time goes on to a certain point of around 10,000 images shot as I read on other websites. I have already cleaned my sensor twice in just 5000 images. They are gone after cleaning but then re-appear again with additional shooting. Frustrating if you are picky about your photography, and who wouldn't be with a camera of this price-point. The cleaning of the sensor can be a daunting task if not approached carefully and with confidence. Many experts say not to do this yourself but really it is not a big deal if done properly with the correct cleaning tools. I will leave that for the experts to delve into on other websites. Anyway, just beware of this is an issue with the Nikon D800 so you will not be surprised when it happens. Really annoying to deal with, but the image specks are removable in Photoshop (clone tool) or in other software applications. Just shouldn't have to deal with this issue and Nikon should address it seriously. If under warranty, you can send back in to Nikon to clean the sensor of the oil specks but you will do this more than once if you don't learn to clean it yourself.
Скроменый эксперт
25.09.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have a chance to experience Nikon D800, after testing FIVE bodies at the local electronic stores, ALL showed the same issue. I finally ended up in returning the camera Nikon D800 after being its owner for 24 hours. After reading some reviews from Amazon, I wanted to contribute mine.It's pretty simple and easy to test this defect of the left focus point of Nikon D800. Within 2 minutes, you should be able to identify the problem. My setting is as follow:-Use FX wide angle lens (mine is 35-70mm F/2.8). Use focal 35mm or wider only.-Select Aperture 2.8 (Aperture priority)-Set speed minimum 100-Set ISO below 3200.-IMPORTANT: select the SPOT light meter mode (first option on the switch next to viewfinder)-IMPORTANT: select the left most focus point in the middle of row of the frame-Chose any paper with small text that you can read or camera can focus.-Use viewfinder (phase defect is more prone to this focus problem)-Set camera 3 ft away and shoot, handheld is fine.- You can see the blurry pictures on the screen camera where you chose to focus.Take more pictures with other focus points, center and right, on the same topic . Then compare and make your own judgement. That's it.I brought my wide angle FX lens and an SD card to the largest electronic store in town ( you know what it is) to try out the D800 bodies, hopefully to get a good one that does not show the left focus issue like many have reviewed on the internet. Unfortunately, after testing FIVE different D800 bodies at two different stores, ALL showed the same problem: left most focus point in SPOT focus mode produces blurry pictures. I do not see problem if I don't use SPOT focus mode.You can easily reproduce this problem when trying out the D800. You can select the topic around any store like the price tag, bar code, etc, (I prefer small text on white paper) using the left most focus point in the SPOT focus mode. Like day and night, you can clearly and easily see the issue on the camera's screen. The focused topic on the picture gets pretty blurry.The ability to focus on a topic accurately of the camera to produce the non-blurry picture is critical in photography. This important feature must be tested and passed before going to mass production or sale services. Nikon and distributor have failed to do that. I don't expect a perfect product, but a fully functional of a determinative feature like the focusing accuracy of an high end camera. I rate this product Nikon D800 as two stars. The first star is for the Nikon employees who put effort to produce this nice camera, but had no authority to fix the left focus point problem. The second star is for the servicing people at the retailer who nicely helped me to experience this camera, but did not know or not aware of this defect.I take three stars off because of those at Nikon manufactures and distributors who know the issue, defect of the product but still want to sale it to customer. Is this an act of cheating?I hope that Nikon will soon admit and fix the left focus of D800, and hope that distributors will not sale any D800 that has this focus problem any more. If this selling continues, I guess distributor and Nikon will get a massive return of this product. That is because most (if not all) users of D800 know how to use the SPOT focus mode and know how to expect a "quality" of an high end camera like the Nikon D800. I am not the only one who addressed this problem, but many others. Is problem real?I also think that the distributor has a power and can force Nikon to admit and fix the "known" problem of the left focus of such a nice camera. Nikon, distributor, please proceed to resolve this problem so that other customers like us still have faith in purchasing the good products from your stores.Thanks for reading my review!Update:Please read comment where you can find the link to pictures I took, that shows blurry pictures using left focus point.
Скроменый эксперт
20.07.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + качество картинки, размеры фото, как требовалось технически, чтобы можно было приближать и кропить детали изображения. Фокусировка. Понятный интерфейс. По видео неоднозначное впечатление: когда снимаешь воду, берег, прибой, заметно торможение, а когда снимаешь людей в помещении, получаешь хорошее качество.
- - после 2000-й примерно фотографии начал выдавать через раз то затемненные, то засветленные кадры, при одинаковом освещении и настройкам. Снималась одежда для каталога. Не способен к постоянной работе, к вечеру начинает затвор медленнее щелкать, будто не рассчитан на постоянную работу.
Почему-то настройки иногда сами сбрасывались.
Черный часто отдает фиолетовым на мелких деталях.
В конце-концов, затвор совсем...
Скроменый эксперт
26.01.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
UPDATE to my updateMore spots = more service. This time, I found the typical round spots as well as a newly identified faint blob on images. These artifacts were best reproduced against a sky blue background. I do like the image quality, but I am absolutely livid about the continuing spot issue. Also on the last occasion, the fine tune settings shifted requiring optimization recalibration of all my lenses.UPDATEMy original review was conferred with 5 stars. I dropped the score to 4 stars after 2x service stops for oil spots. Today, I dropped the score another point for a general system AF shift post service. In short, I am having to apply extreme AF settings to get sharp focus results with my lenses. For example, my 17-35mm worked perfectly with zero adjustment before the second servicing for oil spot removal, and my camera now requires a full 17+ post service. I have to wonder if Nikon has lost its commitment to quality control; the chairman's message is about transparency, but I suppose the consumer doesn't count.ORIGINALI had been looking forward to the day when I'd be able to step up from DX to FX, and be able to capture images approaching film quality. The D800 is that camera for color image capture.I have had over 2500 actuations since my purchase in early December. There have been no issues noted with left side AF when tested at 17 and 35mm at f/2.8 (camera serial 301xxxx). I did note a penchant for green hues, but that was easily remedied via color balance (setting M1). As for performance against the D300 ... well, I hope my daughter enjoys it as much as I did.The colors are really magnificent with a depth approaching Ektachrome, Image details are razor sharp even when blown up; it is amazing to see the facial details, the individual hairs, on a big cat taken 25 yards distant with the D800 and a 70-200mm lens. Being able to duplex captured images has been very handy ... I've already had one instance where an image was deleted on one card, but still available from the second card (I'll admit wishing there were 2 CF slots vs. one SD and one CF).Alas, Nikon hasn't quite achieved perfection.- A sensor oil droplet. Drat that it should have happened, and for the extra work to remove them from my photos. While traveling through LA, I deposited the camera at Nikon's west coast service center in the morning, and retrieved the camera the afternoon of the same day [I have to wonder what else Nikon fixed under the radar, so to speak].- Some controls have changed relative to the D300 which makes for a bit of re-education.- And as noted earlier, there was the green hue. I compensated for it using Rockwell's published hint of adjusting the color balance.- There is an annoying rattle when the flash is closed, which is most of the time, and which stops when the flash is deployed. I guess that's normal, when the locking springs are not engaged.Overall, I'm very impressed. But, I add the final note that the new camera has also been a bit of a home wrecker. My D300 was, as noted, relegated to a new home, my F100 has been demoted to B&W, and the venerable FE is to be retired to eBay.ADDENDUM - Two sensor spots in exactly the same coordinate as previously reported. Knocking down 5 star rating to 4, as this should not have recurred had Nikon tech service performed the service correctly.
Лабузова Анна
30.09.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличная детализация, шустрый аф, высокое iso, отличный дд
- - пока не заметил
Отличная камера в умелых руках. Пришла на смену d300 + d7000
Очень порадовала светочувствительность- для меня до 5000iso. Фокус ловится за долю секунды, что приятно для репортажа, со светосильными фиксами никаких проблем с аф не заметил. Отсутствие режимов u1 и u2 меня не напрягает, так как можно быстро и легко все поменять руками. Первое время сложно приноровиться к чувствительному сенсору. Дд очень радует. Большой объем файлов это просто данность для 36мп
После д300...
Очень порадовала светочувствительность- для меня до 5000iso. Фокус ловится за долю секунды, что приятно для репортажа, со светосильными фиксами никаких проблем с аф не заметил. Отсутствие режимов u1 и u2 меня не напрягает, так как можно быстро и легко все поменять руками. Первое время сложно приноровиться к чувствительному сенсору. Дд очень радует. Большой объем файлов это просто данность для 36мп
После д300...
Скроменый эксперт
08.02.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Скорость работы, после Д90. Баланс белого очень близок к тому что есть на самом деле. Мегапиксели - их много!)
- - Просто тяжелая, опять же с д90 можно проходить целый день в руке, с этой рука за день как после похода в тренажерный зал.
Все таки он стоит своих денег. Кстати полнокадровая...
Щеулов Борис
23.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Традиционные для D100 - D800 серии:
- Хорошая эргономика
- Быстрое включение
- Пылевлагозащитный магниевый корпус
- Расширенные режимы просмотра (Пересветы, RGB гистограмма )
Самые важные для меня:
- Светосильный, нешумный (2500 ISO вполне годится для обработки)
- Высокое разрешение матрицы что есть хорошо для кадрирования
- Большой чистый видоискатель
- Отличные режимы фокусировки
- Широкий динамический диапазон
- Сохранение настроек для 10 мануальных объективов
- Великолепный экран и режим просмотра отснятого материала, все видно.
- Поддержка DX оптики + режим расширяющий кроп для DX оптики.
- Электронный дальномер (Хорош для мануальных объективов)
- Включение и выключение АвтоISO колесом управления
Плюшки:
- Возможность съемки видео в FullHD
- Съемка в режиме HDR
- Подключение USB 3.0
- Съемка в TIFF
- 2 карточки памяти
- Датчик уровня наклона камеры - - - Катастрофический следящий автофокус при съемке видео
- Автоматический экспозамер хромает на контрастных кадрах периодически прыгая от пересвета к недоэкспозиции.
- Ошибки экспозиции в режиме "P" как результат предыдущего пункта
- Тяжеловат, а с "вкусной" оптикой становится еще тяжелее (Может это и плюс, меньше будет гулять в руках)
Вот и пришло время, наконец-то созрел поменять свою старушку D200 на новый флагманский агрегат в своей серии. Субъективно вижу пока одни плюсы, все-таки хорошо менять камеру проскакивая сразу несколько поколений,...
Скроменый эксперт
29.06.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I can't contribute the incredible aspects of this camera better than what has already been stated on Amazon's reviews, but I'll toss a couple of extra notes in. Also, this is the first review I have written on Amazon where I didn't purchase the product through Amazon's website.1. Before receiving my camera from YM Camera in Boardman, Ohio...I was coming from my tried and true D700. I took my 32GB CF card (a 133x Sandisk) and put it in my D800. I shot RAW + Fine JPG on my D700 and it was adequate with a 133x card....but not for the D800. The 133x worked, but man was it slow!! I ended up breaking down and purchasing a 64GB Sandisk Extreme Pro card (633x read (95MB/s), 600x write (90MB/s). That certainly solved my problems with writing to the card...and on a SD card nonetheless! I did a test of how fast the 64GB Extreme Pro card could keep up with my camera. I always shoot RAW + Fine JPG, but for a test I set up my camera to 14bit JPG only...which averages about 20mb per JPG. In 4 FPS burst mode (the max of the D800 in FX Mode), it took my camera over 3 minutes to run out of buffer space. The card was able to keep up with writing to the card almost as fast as the camera buffer could go. I was blown away. It was like having a backup buffer in the SD slot.2. Battery life is definately something to take into consideration, especially if video is used often. I am able to go out with my D700 and a fully charged battery and shoot pretty much all day and not touch my 2nd battery. That is not the case with the D800. Having a 2nd and/or 3rd battery is essential, especially when a lof of video is used. Make sure to price check around. The camera shop I use, [...], has the batteries on hand for $69.99, while Amazon has them for around $100.3. I preordered my D800 from my local camera shop, and within 2 and a half weeks, it was in the store. If you are intent on receiving this camera ASAP, it wouldn't hurt to drop your local camera shop a call to see their ETA. YM Camera was getting about 1-2 D800's in per week, and at the time, I was 3rd on their list. Seems like I was able to side step the long waiting line at Amazon. I purchase a ton of items from Amazon (and only review the ones that I feel deserve a 5 star rating), but this is an exception.4. I have on hand my 50mm 1.4, 14-24 2.8 24-70, 2.8, 70-200 VR2, and a couple of other lenses on hand. One thing I will be looking for is a 2.8 lens with VR on it. I don't usually mind a little of hand shake with video, but this camera gives such great quality videos, that other little aspects start to come to the forefront...such as an unsteady hand. I am considering the Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR AF-S Nikkor Lens, but may hold out if/when Nikon releases a 24-70 2.8 with VR on it. The 24-85 might be just a bit slow for my taste. I can get by with what I have available to me at the moment, but down the road, something with VR will be nice to add to the collection.5. An external mic may be a nice accessory to have with the D800 also. When using AF for video, it is easy to hear on the video. I don't have an external mic yet, but I hope it would reduce the lens AF when video is used. In a quite setting, it is easy to hear. Our family went to an amusement part with our 3 year old daughter last week, and the AF noise wasn't as prevalent due to crowd/ride noise in the background. But like I said, I don't have an external mic yet, so I am not sure if that will aid in reducing the noise from the AF mechanisms.What an incredible camera. Coming from a D700, I would have to suggest upgrading to a D800 only if your finances allow. It is not worth going into debt just for a D800 upgrade. If your profession or desires leave you on the fence and the finances are available, it is well worth it. Nikon has an engineering work of art here. I can't commend them high enough for the quality of product the have produced for the average/pro consumer. My hats off to them!!!!
Скроменый эксперт
18.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've spent a few weeks comparing the 5d mark iii and the d800 - both excellent cameras in different ways. Out of the two, the 5d3 has the superior build and Canon after sales support is superior - I believe Canon QC is tighter and if I was using this gear to make money, then I would give strong consideration to these advantages. The Canon has probably the most advanced AF on the market and it is a faster camera which does a reasonably good job in shooting action.All that said, the Nikon has the superior sensor. Dynamic range is better - primarily in shadow detail and the complete absence of banding, the latter of which can show up with the 5d3 when shadows are fully pushed in post-processing. The 5d3 applies NR on the sensor, which results in pixel level smearing at high ISO (>6400). This is a subtle artifact that's not obvious at normal viewing sizes. In terms of JPG output, it's easier to get high quality high ISO shots out of the 5d3 because of it's more aggressive (but very well done) noise reduction.The story changes when shooting RAW. I have taken identical pictures with both camera - the d800/24-70 f/2.8 and the Canon 5d3/35L. Both shot at 35mm/2.8/ISO6400. I downsized the d800 picture and applied the exact same level of sharpening and luminance noise reduction to both files. When examining both pics at pixel level, I would say that the (very slight) edge goes to the d800. This is by virtue of it's superior shadow noise performance and retention of detail in the shadows. At normal viewing sizes on my retina display macbook pro, the d800 and 5d3 (when normalized to the same image size) have essentially identical noise performance.At base ISO, in normal lighting conditions, the d800 has far superior detail - by virtue of it's higher resolution and DR. The resolution, color, sharpness are absolute top tier. With an excellent lens like the 24-70, the images are absolutely stunning.Color is what you make of it in processing and what your lens renders. the d800/24-70 produces great color - I see no disadvantage (or advantage) relative to the 5d3.AWB is better on the d800 compared to the Canon. Again, when shooting RAW, this is not a big deal.Shooting with the 24-70, the d800 has exceptional AF accuracy. It is stunningly accurate in low light conditions. The 5d3 is also excellent, but I cannot say it's better or worse, given the different lenses used. AF speed is highly dependent on the lens used - with the 24-70, it's essentially instantaneous.At f/2.8, my camera body has accurate L/R AF banks. There can be field curvature issues with certain lenses, but at f/2.8, the sharpness at the lateral banks are accurate. The L bank AF issue is real for some people - it's primarily an issue in bodies shooting wide open with prime lenses. That said, most full frame cameras have imperfect edge AF sensor performance and most lenses have issues rendering images with perfect sharpness at the edge of the frame.Bottom line - these cameras are very close, but if you are looking for the best absolute image quality, the d800 provides it. In order to extract the kind of noise performance that levels the playing ground with the Canon, you must shoot RAW. When doing so, there is no difference in high ISO performance. If you value great high ISO performance with straight out of camera JPGs, then the 5d3 has the advantage. Otherwise, the DR and resolution of the d800 is pretty incredible and represents the next level in performance. You can't go wrong with either.
Скроменый эксперт
10.12.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Приемлемый уровень шума, хороший динамический диапазон, адекватный баланс белого.
- - Громадный процент промахов автофокуса при съёмке со вспышкой. Только из-за этого хочется иногда использовать камеру вместо молотка. При естественном освещении, когда в горячем башмаке ничего не стоит, аф идеален...
Виталий Шевченко
17.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
проверяйте всё при покупке. потом все проблемы ваши.
- + резкость.
- - Пишу только для покупателей этой (да и не только этой) камеры, чтобы предостеречь их, и они знали, на что надо обратить внимание при покупке. Я купил этот аппарат в конце января. В магазине его распаковывали при мне, и я был первым, кто взял камеру в руки. Я только один раз, в магазине, надел на аппарат объектив Nikon 28-300, тщательно наблюдая за тем, чтобы вокруг не было даже признаков пыли (осмотрев всё ярким светодиодным фонариком). Вообще к этим вещам я отношусь предельно педантично. При фотографировании в наши ненастные зимние будни, когда солнца нет, проблема не проявлялась. Вместе с тем, во время отпуска в феврале, когда солнца было в достатке, я обнаружил на снимках, сделанных в солнечную погоду, пятна на снимках. Небольшие, но всё же... Отправился в сервис Никона. Сервис же Nikon.ru, во-первых, заставил меня заплатить за чистку фотосенсора, а во-вторых, сделал это некачественно - появились другие пятна... Мне вообще заявили, что "незначительные загрязнения не влияют на работоспособность камеры". Комментировать эту мысль я считаю нецелесообразным.
P.S. Привожу файлы jpg и nef снимка, на котором видны загрязнения.
На jpg я их обвёл красной линией, чтобы было заметнее.
Поскольку пятна имеют круглую правильную форму, то я очень сомневаюсь, что это пыль...
То, что эти пятна не были устранены полностью, лишь говорит в пользу этого предположения.
Похоже, что это масло. Сервис Никона (ул.Ленинская Слобода, 19), тем не менее, взял с меня деньги за чистку от пыли.
Наколько это справедливо и честно, судите сами.
http://yadi.sk/d/0RyBelOu3KEYA - ipg
http://yadi.sk/d/N9QajOPV3KGY4 - raw
На jpg я их обвёл красной линией, чтобы было заметнее.
Поскольку пятна имеют круглую правильную форму, то я очень сомневаюсь, что это пыль...
То, что эти пятна не были устранены полностью, лишь говорит в пользу этого предположения.
Похоже, что это масло. Сервис Никона (ул.Ленинская Слобода, 19), тем не менее, взял с меня деньги за чистку от пыли.
Наколько это справедливо и честно, судите сами.
http://yadi.sk/d/0RyBelOu3KEYA - ipg
http://yadi.sk/d/N9QajOPV3KGY4 - raw
Скроменый эксперт
03.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
(There are already many reviews on how this camera compare to the older Nikon D700, it's competitor: Canon 5D Mark III, so I won't reiterate)About me: Been using SLR for over 20 years... first 10 on film, recent 10 on digital SLR's. I've used Leica, Nikon, Canon SLR's... and I've longed to get the next full-frame (FX) camera after Nikon D700 (without referring it to "D700 replacement"). When the camera was finally announced, it came out like a pair of twins were born. The D800 and D800E are almost identical, and I wasn't sure which baby to choose. If you have the same dilemma, read on...Many people (myself included) doesn't seemed overly concerned that D800 is $300 cheaper, because many photographers are perfectionists and the hope that D800E offers sharper images makes it really tempting. But after after much research and comparisons, I finally chose D800 (no E). Why??? Here's my rationale:Eventually, the choice to get D800E instead of D800 hinges on trade-off between* benefits of greater sharpness, against* cost or risk of Moire (or unexpected patterns in the pics/video)Depending on what you shoot:* portraits, fashion, weddings, architectures, wide range of stuff => Go for D800* macro, landscape, tripod-mounted shots or those with time to position light/camera/subject => Go for D800EMoire MAY occur when you shoot repeated patterns, such as:* fabrics (on clothes)* glass or windows of buildings* straight hair of peopleOnce it happens, it's not easy to remove in photos (despite claims that a few clicks on Adobe Lightroom 4, or Photoshop). It's also more problematic in video, which I'm not sure how it can be corrected.As such, one camp of people would say they rather have sharper images ALL the time, and risk a small x% of time that they get Moire. That seems fine reason except that to get the sharper images distinguishable between the 800E and the 800, it's ALMOST ALWAYS due to other factors such as:1. lens (do you have the high quality glass)2. filter (high quality filter in front of lens?)3. ISO (if you shoot at high ISO, the noise will eliminate such clarity)4. f/stop or aperture (depth of field)5. camera shake (tripod?)6. how close you examine the photoTo detect the clarity difference between D800 and D800E, according to Nikon, you need to be shooting at 3 stops above max aperture of a great lens (usually f8-f11). Above this range, it negates the benefits of D800E. Furthermore, in order to see the difference, you need to pixel peep, and at the plane of focus.- I typically shoot with wide aperture for the bokeh and rarely are my subjects in the same flat plane- I usually don't look so closely at my photos, so that clarity is good to have but not criticalTo detect Moire, you can likely see it with your naked eye if the area is large. It can occur on a person's cloths, or a building or just railing beside your subject.- You can prevent this before you shoot by repositioning the lights, subject or camera. But it's a chore!- You can fix it after you shoot with software. But it requires the shot be on RAW format to be more effective! Also a chore!.If like me, you don't want to deal with these pre-production and post-production work and just want to enjoy taking great shots of what you see, then I believe D800 is yours to buy. Precious moments are limited and I'd rather spend extra time capturing them than figuring out how to avoid or fix Moire. There are people with patience and care to fix all these, but I'm not one of them... and perhaps by then, another new camera would have been born - hopefully not a triplet this time. :)I've been toying with this new camera and will post additional comments soon...If this helps you better decide which camera is better for you, let me (and others know) by clicking the "Is this review helpful" below. I'm sure there are other reviewers out there who would give various viewpoint and hopefully this will add a valuable perspective as well.
Скроменый эксперт
17.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + ФФ, меню, удобство управления.
- - Ожидал меньшей шумности. Отсутствие поддержки дистанционных ик-пультов.
Перешёл с D50. Сутки на то, чтобы вникнуть в настройки и уверенно пользовать аппарат. Всё интуитивно понятно, на своих местах.
Впечатления, как если с бюджетной легковушки пересел на мерседес s класса - вроде всё сложнее, масса больше, больше функций, ответственности... но управлять проще.
Так и здесь, то, что в D 50 доставалось только из меню, в D800 лежит на поверхности. Мануальная оптика прекрасно работает в приоритете диафрагмы, предварительный подъём зеркала включается поворотом диска, и много других приятных мелочей.
Ноут с RAW файлами справляется чуть дольше, но некритично (8 гб оперативка)
В общем, неделя владения принесла только положительные эмоции.
Расстроило только отсутствие ик-порта, старый пульт не подходит.
Впечатления, как если с бюджетной легковушки пересел на мерседес s класса - вроде всё сложнее, масса больше, больше функций, ответственности... но управлять проще.
Так и здесь, то, что в D 50 доставалось только из меню, в D800 лежит на поверхности. Мануальная оптика прекрасно работает в приоритете диафрагмы, предварительный подъём зеркала включается поворотом диска, и много других приятных мелочей.
Ноут с RAW файлами справляется чуть дольше, но некритично (8 гб оперативка)
В общем, неделя владения принесла только положительные эмоции.
Расстроило только отсутствие ик-порта, старый пульт не подходит.
Скроменый эксперт
07.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The D800 does almost everything you can hope for in a DSLR; fast focus, good color, easily understandable menus, and well placed ergonomics make this my favorite of all the cameras I have used throughout my 12 year career as a photographer. I have been using the D800 for about 2 years for weddings, corporate, portraits, scenic, studio and photojournalism.The batteries last long enough to fill 2 64GB cards, but it depends on what lens you are using, larger lens require more power than small prime lenses.The huge file sizes in RAW format are a mixed blessing, they are so big the camera can be a replacement for a medium format camera, but the huge file size means that you need a lot of CF cards. I have have often filled six 64GB CF cards in one day. If you don't like to delete image files you will also need a lot of external harddrives.This camera is good for most pros who already have a good collection of professional grade Nikon lenes. Hobbyists would be much better off buying the Nikon D610 and a great lens. The D800's slow frame rate also means that it it not a good camera for sports or wildlife photography. For wildlife I would recommend the Nikon D300 because the FX format will add about 50% to the focal length of your lens, and the camera will be more economical.
Гордеев Евгений
06.11.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + удобный, довольно надежный(всяко лучше Д7000 и Д600 - опыт был), детализация 36Мп - и отсюда удобство - можно кадрировать кадр, запас Мпикс позволяет! это удобно.
- - начну с малого - прошивку обязательно обновите. А то возможно залипание зеркала намертво ;)
2. Жрет батареи! за 3-5ч, по 1шт. (смотря как интенсивно снимать)
У меня были раньше и Д7000, и Д600(продал оба. А батарейка там такая же как на Д800), и на них можно было на 1 батарее отснять всю свадьбу. А на Д800 ТОЧНО не получится. ;)) надо 2-3шт, смотря сколько часов съемка.
3. Иногда не срабатывает кнопка спуска затвора(пока не понял в чем причина, и при каких условиях. Обычная свадебная съемка). Нужно пересфокусироваться на объекте.
4. Через годик использования, резинка чуть вспухла. Через полтора - отклеилась часть. (это передняя ручка, под кнопкой спука) Традиционная проблема тушек и объективов никона.
Дробных оценок нельзя к сожалению.. я бы поставил...
Олег
13.08.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Аппарат приобрел год назад как замену D300s. Порадовало высокое разрешение, огромный динамический диапазон матрицы и как всегда продуманная эргономика. Минус только один, да и то не минус, а вполне закономерное следствие наличия на борту матрицы в 36 мегапикселей - аппарат требует оптики с высокой разрешающей способностью. Так что, приобретя такую тушку, надо быть готовым к тому, что скоро может встать вопрос о покупке топового зума или набора хороших фиксов.
Благодатин Василий
29.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + 1. Удобство хвата в руке, особенно с батарейной ручкой (ношу его просто в руке, на шею не вешаю)
2. Идеально для нетребовательного репортажа. В моем репортаже 12 к/с неважно. Пока будешь хлопать затвором, пропустишь нужный момент в интервалах между кадрами, поэтому на покадровой съемке всегда попадаю в нужный момент (снимаю спортивные и молодежные мероприятия). А так как непрерывная съемка, как на D4 мне не нужна, а автофокус в D800 этой камере идеален, для репортажа отлично! Кому не нужен вайфай и прочие приблуды, для репортажа камера идеальна из-за автофокуса и удобства хвата!
3. Полный идеал для постановки. Широченный динамический диапазон, RAW тяни как хочешь.
4. Светочувствительность великолепна. До 3200 пользуюсь смело. Ситуаций с 6400 почти не встречал, не знаю, что надо снимать, чтоб выходить выше. Пускай кто-то пишет "шумы с 800 начинаются" и т.д., могу только сказать "И что?". Эти шумы "с 800" мешают только самим владельцам, конечный результат все-равно другой будет. Да и фото смотрят в основном все в онлайне, там и 3200 не заметно.
5. Высокое разрешение. С 36 Мп можно печатать А1 смело. Смотришь в упор и пикселей не видишь.
6. Отличное...
Скроменый эксперт
14.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Идеальный аппарат за вменяемые деньги. Фотки с огромным запасом качества, великолепны в обработке. Тончайшие оттенки цвета и прозрачная картинка. Использую с фиксами - любую картинку можно урезать в половину - особенно удобно снимать кого-то издалека, а затем увеличить объект раз этак в два - три. Управление - 5 баллов. Встроенная вспышка совсем не лишняя
- - Для меня последнее ISO 640, далее лезет шум.
Видео: неплохая картинка, но отвратительный звук - даже для речи обязательно нужен микрофон
В среднем выходит 25 Мб jpeg и 208 Мб tiff. Очень аккуратно со светлыми объектами - матрица очень чувствительная. Обладание сим девайсом реально греет душу - такой аппарат юзаю впервые! Альтернативы за эти деньги на сегодня ему нет
Обелянцев Иван
01.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Высокий динамический диапазон, разрешение просто чумовое, не зря есть тесты сравнения со средним форматом. ISO рабочие все! Надо понимать, что снимая на 6400, вы рискуете на других камерах воoбще остаться без фото, а здесь....в темной комнате, как днем, без штатива, правда стекло 35 1,4 G. удобная, меня хват устраивает. Бред описанный выше про. зеленит, и другую лабудень, считайте бредом. реальные недостатки см ниже. кропать можно сколько угодно, я авто портрет в зрачке человека кропал. Аккамулятора вполне хватает на 16 Гб. памяти. Если сериями не строчить то мне на всю свадьбу батареи хватает, кстати ручку батарейную не понял зачем надо покупать, купил китайскую с Двумя АБ в комплекте. за 2000 руб, держат заряд они лучше никоновской. Три АБ это много!
- - Только для людей зарабатывающих фото деньги. Требует вложений. Комп современный, (хотя это тоже плюс) хоть комп нормальный поставил, стекла...
Скроменый эксперт
14.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The D800 is often compared to the Cannon D5 Mark III. Both are superb cameras. The difference is like choosing a Mercedes or BMW. Both have their strengths and well.. strengths (just one does a little better than the other depending on conditions). Either way you will be delighted.What I love about the D800. The sensor is magnificent. When you couple up this camera to professional or pro-sumer lenses the overall rating on the image quality for sharpness is unparalleled. I think of the body and lenses as a components of a camera. Its the paired version that creates the opportunity for the owner to create beautiful images. Nikon's lenses are unparalleled for DSLR and combined with the power of this sensor you can create images as sharp as many medium format cameras. As a National Geographic photographer said "you can blow images up to the size of a house." While that may not be required by some people certainly an image that is razor sharp at any size is appreciated; we all hate those little colored blocks...The camera controls are very easy to follow but can be intimidating to early users. First, this camera is not used by many novices. Second the controls most used are easy to use. I would highly recommend this camera and a nice set of FX lenses. Don't go cheap on the lenses or filters! Why buy a Mercedes and put cheap tires on it?
Дзиов Валерий
04.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Лично для меня эргономика! расположение кнопок, прекрасно лежит в руках абсолютно понятное меню и легкость в настройках( перешел на него с D7000 так вот неспешная ( со вздохами восхищения) настройка фотоаппарата под себя заняла 10-20 минут, просто великолепная матрица! iso до 1250 100% рабочее, очень много "плюшек" в виде HDR и того подобного.
- - Если искать , то недостатки можно найти в любом аппарате, любой степени профессиональности и ценовой категории. Да хотелось бы дешевле, однако на данный аппарат считаю цену вполне адекватной, да думаю 36 мегапикселей слегка перебор, что ведет к покупке очень качественной оптики для разрешения всех мегапикселов , отсюда и возможный эффект микро шевеленки ( подъем зеркала) , что ведет нас к более коротким выдержкам ( а это в свою очередь к дорогой светосильной...
Скроменый эксперт
02.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Many reviews of this camera warn that it is for the professional, someone with perfect technique and top-shelf lenses. After owning it for a month, I know what they mean.Most of the time, I can't tell a big difference between photos taken with the D800 and the D7100. Both cameras are exceptional.Both are used primarily for wildlife, hand-held, in a kayak. For this, the D7100 is usually the better choice because it shoots a little faster and has a 1.5x crop factor. It costs less, so you'll probably worry about it less and use it more.There is no need for me to go into the science of why the D800 is so good. You can find a dozen articles online that discuss the camera's resolving powers. What matters is that when you get it right with the D800, you will know it. And your friends and family will inevitably mention National Geographic, photo contests or selling your work.The D800 is like a musical instrument. The more you practice, the better it gets. Don't expect to pick it up and crank out a masterpiece. In 2013, the D800 is the "Stradivarius" of cameras. If your lens collection is primarily consumer and pro-sumer grade, buy the D7100. If you have some high-end glass and you are committed to sharpening your skills, consider the D800.At f22 against a bright white sky, I had no issues with dust or oil spots on the sensor. Can't say the same for my D7100. But Nikon has probably corrected this issue by now.While the camera is expensive and better than I am at taking pictures, buying it was a fairly easy decision. If you are really into photography, you know how it goes...You have two choices:1. You could not buy it.2. You spend most of your free time wondering when you are going to buy it.In conclusion: If you are fiscally responsible and focused on sports & wildlife, get the D7100. If you have the talent, patience, lenses and dough get the D800.
Показаны отзывы 49-72 из 618.
