Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D800 Body
618 отзывов пользователей o Nikon D800 Body
Пользовались
Nikon D800 Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Зиняков Иван
17.04.2016
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Полный кадр. В первые дни хвалил из за отсутствия сравнения. Сам щас переломных плюсов не вижу.
- - Пишу про то что успел за 3 года пользования увидеть от сия творения и к своему ужасу узнал что это встречается у многих. Кратко. Многопиксельность с 80 мб равом для меня минус. Несколько кадров подряд и кэш забит на несколько секунд, даже с быстрой картой памяти. Часто видна на фото шевелёнка, появляются следы масла на матрице, частые промахи фокуса, шумит на невысоких исо - сравнивал с 3200, отклеелись резинки, на хвате. Резкость не лучше...
Черников Леонид
09.09.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Реальные цвета,множество всяких настроек,особено хорош видоискатель чёрные датчики лучше красных точек в 3200сотом!
- - служебная информация только на верхнем дисплее,мне плохо видно.нет дисков исо и шкалы яркости,опять не...
Скроменый эксперт
31.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought a REFURB D800 with serial number 304xxxx from a reputable authorized US dealer.Before I made the purchase I researched and found all the manufacturer problems I could potentially encounter:1) inaccurate left focus point;2) green cast on LCD screen;3) dust/oil spot on sensor;4) mis-aligned viewfinder grid;5) problem remotely triggering flashlight.I convinced myself all these problems must have been sorted out, there should be no problem. And since refurb unit came with 3 months US Nikon warranty, worst case would be sending my unit to service.After I received the camera, I did extensive test to the camera. My unit definitely do not have problem 4) and 5) I mentioned above. Honestly, I am pretty sure problem 4) is just rare outlier problem since I have only seen on complain online; also, 5) is probably a virtually non-exist problem or it's fixed by firmware update already.Nikon expert Thom Hogan said the left autofocus point problem "appears to have stopped in the US with serial numbers higher than about 3055000". Since my unit is below that number, I performed extensive autofocus test. My test included shooting test target such as Siemens, strips suggest by Thom Hogan and real life test, I concluded my unit has the problem. The problem was very minor though... To a point that I don't even want to send it to service.Next I compare the LCD screen with my old Nikon D90, at that time I notice that the LCD on my D90 is much cooler (in the sense that it's more bluish) and the D800 do have a yellow/greenish cast. Finally, I also found a spot (pretty large, don't think that is dust) on the sensor. So, unfortunately my unit has problem 2) and 3) too.Because of problem 1),2) and 3), I decided to send it in to service.Two and a half weeks after I sent my unit to Nikon Los Angeles repair center I received my unit back. There are two things I really want to mention about the repair:1) Nikon website for tracking your repair is useless. The status you see is not up to date. For instance, even I check the status website daily, I receive my D800 back before any status update.2) I was told that they can change the color space of the D800 to look like D3, but I have to pay $30. I disagree with them. After a few phone calls, they escalate my case. The final respond from the cooperate office is that the D800 is more accurate than ever, if I want the change, it would be consider is a modification, but not a repair, hence there must be a $30 fee.Finally I decided not to pay for the $30 fee.Having heard a person online sent his D800 for problem 1) repair received a D800 that has sharp left autofocus point, but the originally sharp center point got messed up. I redid all my test.Guess what, all problem gone =) All focus points are sharp! Oil spot on sensor is gone. You might think it is my self protect mechanism, but I notice that if I compare the D90's LCD to the actual environment lighting, D90 LCD screen a bit too bluish, the D800's LCD is more accurate. So yes, the D800 screen is more yellow compare to D90's, but I do feel it is more faithful to the environment actual lighting. May be it's just me...Anyway, after a week with the repaired camera, I AM STILL AMAZED BY THE STUNNING DETAIL AND SHARPNESS this D800 can produce. Also, the DYNAMIC RANGE IS SECOND TO NONE! You can recover highlight and (especially) shadow like never before. Coming from D90 (with some decent lenss), the ISO performance is amazing. ISO1600 is very clean without any noise reduction. ISO3200 and 6400 is useable with little work. The only drawback is the heavy weight compare to my old D90. But it is a worthy price to pay for the sturdiness and stability.As an off topic point, people trash D800 when comparing high iso noise with 5D mark III. 5d mark III OVERRATE THEIR ISO. I do believe that the 5D mark III would perform better, but probably not by much. If you google "d800 noise Candlelight", you will see a video the compare D800, 5D mark II and 5D mark III at different iso level. You can see at the same ISO level, the D800 is much brighter than the others (people said about 2/3 to 1 stop difference). So, conservatively D800's ISO1000 is like 5d mark III ISO 1600!!UPDATE - 4/3/2013 - A bonus from Nikon:Yesterday Nikon posted firmware update ( D800 A:1.01 / B:1.02). Many people reported improved AF speed and accuracy. I installed the firmware. Tested non scientifically and found noticeable improvement! Thank you Nikon!UPDATE - 4/25/2013I have upped 1 star to give the D800 five stars from my original 4 stars rating. I have used the camera a lot recently. After each shooting section when I check out the photos, I still always end up with a "WOW". The crazy dynamic range and the sharpness is insane! Auto focus is also amazing even with non-center focus point. (I don't do video, so I have no comment on that)
Скроменый эксперт
23.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Writing review as a former d200 then d300 and now d800 user. I have been using the d800 for several months now with a variety of lenses in a range of shooting situations. I use the camera for a mix of professional work which includes portraits and product stills, and for fun.Controls:I upgraded from my d300 because I dropped it and the flash was no longer working. The transition has been relatively smooth although I do find that I have had to relearn and remap a few of the controls. The switching of the + and - zoom controls still gets me, and I do miss the old auto focus mode selector that used to be on the back of my d300. I like having the bracketing button in easy access have it set to easily shoot in camera HDRs. Overall I find the control layout an improvement from the d300 especially the one touch live view button, and simple toggle between AF and MF.Using DX lenses:I still use my 17-55 DX lens with the d800 and right now am very happy with the results. I have my custom button set to switch between FX, 1.2x, and DX crop modes which is a lifesaver when using my old 17-55. Past its widest settings I like to use this lens in the 1.2x crop mode to get nice detailed 25mp images without too much vignetting. I have a 27" imac an on this size screen I cannot tell the difference between a 15mp dx cropped image and a 36mp full frame image but for large prints it may make a difference. One thing I do love about shooting the full 36mp resolution however is penalty free cropping. I had to be careful on my 12mp d300 about not cropping to much and loosing image quality but now I will crop out half of a 36mp file still be floored by the amout of detail. Overall I see no problem with using my DX lenses with the new camera and actually enjoy the added flexibility and creative potential they provide. I sometimes enjoy the circular image the 17-55 creates at its widest setting at the FX crop.ISO:Based solely on my observations I would say the d800 gains about 2 2/3 stops in ISO quality. Before, I would shoot my d300 up to ISO 400 and be completely satisfied with noise, dynamic range, and color quality. With the d800 I can now bump up to ISO 2500 and be completely satisfied with image quality. In low light situations I find bumping the d800 to ISO 5000 is about as high as I am willing to go before the image quality starts to degrade significantly. Auto ISO works much better and is easier to setup.RAW vs JPEG:I like to shoot RAW + JPEG and find that most of the time I am happy with the JPEG. Reading reviews I thought that RAW would provide a HUGE headroom in the shadows and while I find there is a good amount of data in the shadows I would say no more than a stop. Files are very detail but you can definitely see the effects of the anti aliasing filter and sometimes I wish I had sprung for the d800E. By default RAW images are not especially sharp and I almost always need to bump up the sharpness in software. On a positive note in the thousands of pictures I have shot I have yet to see moire.Metering:I find that the metering is much better on the d800 than d300. I rarely switch away from multizone metering as it is just very good at figuring out the scene and I dont have to use a lot of exposure compensation either.Live view:Live view is a VAST improvement from the d300 which was almost unusable. Having a button to quickly pull up live veiw is great! Although live view focusing still leaves quite a bit to be desired it will eventually find focus in most lighting situations.Auto focus:About the same as the d300. Fast and dependable as long as you can find a point with good contrast to lock onto.Overall:I am very happy with my d800 purchase. I recently purchased the 50mm 1.8 and have been using this for shallow depth of field and low light shots and think the color quality and sharpness of this combination is just outstanding. If I could think of a complaint I would say the Live View focusing could be better, and the battery life is not quite as good as my old d300 which was just insane. The build quality is also just a tiny notch below the d300 but overall feels very professional. The rear screen on the d800 is great and I have not had any color tint problems. The left focus problems that have plagued so many other users has not been an issue for me. I would say everything about the d800s image quality is a step better than the d300 and the main thing it has been doing for me is allowing me to shoot more freely. I shoot looser crops because I know I can always crop in without losing quality, and I rarely worry about how high I have take my ISO which used to be a constant worry with the d300. I debated for a long time which camera would suit be best as an upgrade for my d300. I went between waiting for a d300 successor, getting a used d700, slimming down with an OMD-E5, buying a d600 or going for the d800. A direct d300 successor would have been nice but the added depth of field with full frame was a big decider for me as I s
ФИЛИППОВ ПАВЕЛ
28.06.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + ДД, АФ, особенно в режиме 3d. Не смотря на полный кадр и 36 мп, объём и вес камеры вполне удобны.
- - Отсутствие ИК-порта. Использовать ИК ПДУ...
Яцко Степан
24.07.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Матрица, отсюда отличная детализация.
Эргономика, все как всегда под рукой.
Емкий аккумулятор, хватает на весь день.
Видоискатель. - - Автофокус. Самый отвратительный который я встречал у Никона. На черном или белом объекте(надписи) ни в какую не хочет фокусироваться. Гоняет туда-суда линзы.
Скорость съемки.
Малюсенький буфер. То и дело камера начинает думать после кадра(серии кадров). Нажимаешь просмотр, а он думает и думает. В итоге отключаю камеру, жду пока запишет и включаю.
10pin хлипкий.
Резинки стандартно отклеиваются.
Мало точек фокусировки.
Камера отличный вариант для студийной, свадебной, а лучше пейзажной съемки. Матрица просто потрясающая: цвета, детали, полутени...
xXx Виктор
25.03.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + 36 для студии просто сказка.
Удобно лежит в руке, хотя батарейная ручка всё же понадобилась и по прямому назначению и для комфортного удержания камеры.
ДД - хороший как в прочем у всех никонов.
Огромный светлый видоискатель. - - Невозможность сменить настройки одной рукой из-за вынесенной чёрти куда кнопки iso и wb.
Мало настроек для кнопки предпросмотра грип.
Нет режимов u1 u2 что за такие деньги считаю просто дико и ужасно.
Ну конечно же большие raw но после первой съёмки в студии и просмотра снимков на компьютере это не минус, а просто особенность камеры и 36мп.
Сложно снимать движущиеся объекты даже людей просто меняющих позу даже на 1/200 можно получить смаз.
Аккамулятора хватает на 650-800 кадров.
Флэшки которые потянут серийную съёмку обходятся очень дорого.
Больше мегапикселей - дольше обработка.
Плохо дружит с sb-910 промахи по экспозиции постоянные, спасает только широкий дд.
Горячий башмак на миллиметра 2 шире чем нужно, из-за чего вспышка и синхронизаторы там болтаются.
Электронно-оптический видоискатель и + в тёмное время суток и - т.к. тоже кушает батарейку которой и так мало.
Время от времени может на cf флэшку 1000х 1 кадр писать по минуте. Хорошо хоть снимать в этот момент дальше можно, но это очень странно.
И так начнём с бед которые были в моём экземпляре 1 и самое отвратительное за такие деньги я получил тушку которая выдавала такой фронт фокус что словами не передать, пришлось тащить в сервис.
Второй момент, связан опять с автофокусом, он хорошо себя показывает до сумерек дальше толку ноль -2EV? - чушь. Опять же автофокус, на светосильных объективах ведёт себя не всегда...
Второй момент, связан опять с автофокусом, он хорошо себя показывает до сумерек дальше толку ноль -2EV? - чушь. Опять же автофокус, на светосильных объективах ведёт себя не всегда...
Скроменый эксперт
10.09.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
By now many people have reported on the internet problems with Nikon D800 and D800E autofocus. It is frequently reported that autofocus points on the left side do not work well. On four cameras (two D800s and two D800Es), I can confirm the problem!I have extensively tested four of these cameras (see testing notes below) and all four did not focus well when using the left most center focus point. Because those problems were so pronounced, I decided to return the cameras and did not test the other left side focus points. Internet reports discuss problems with those as well.It has been reported that the D800Es perform better than the D800s. That is somewhat consistent with my experience. The left autofocus points were worse on the D800s; however, I had one D800E with poor autofocus overall. That same D800E also had a broken electronic release connector when I received it. The other D800E performed better overall than the three other samples, but still not good enough. All four have been returned.What happens? Using standard autofocus, the camera will not focus well on the left most (center) autofocus point. In Live View mode you can get good focus (either manually focusing at maximum magnification or by using Live View autofocus). In side by side comparisons, Live View produces better results than standard autofocus. In many cases the differences were substantial with standard autofocus not producing results that were acceptable.Internet reports suggest many of the left side focus points have problems, not just the left center one. While that may be true, as I mentioned above, I did not test those on my four cameras because the left/center focus point off was enough to justify returning the cameras.For some people, not having the left autofocus working well won't matter. For me, I regularly shoot vertical landscapes and other vertical compositions where the left side selective focus points are very useful. I've been using the selective focus points on my D300 for years and find them quite valuable. Taking advantage of them has become very quick and simple for me and it is a feature that makes me more productive. So, I want them to work on the D800/E!There may be another serious impact of this problem even if you don't have that same needs as I do. Internet reports suggest that the 3D focusing function of the camera will also be degraded by left focus points not working correctly.For those interested this is how I tested the cameras, here's the process:- Put three focus targets on a wall corresponding to the center focus point, the left most center point, and the right most center point- Take shots where the selective focus points are on the center target, the left target, and the right target. Take four shots each with autofocus and four shots each with Live View (in other words, 8 shots per target, 24 shots per sequence. Another way of thinking of it is 4 comparison sets per target and 12 comparison sets per sequence)- Repeat sequence at different focal length and camera distance- Repeat all of the above with a different lens- Compare results in Adobe Lightroom side by side with the Library view X/Y comparison tool- On my first two cameras I used manual focus for Live View and on the second two cameras I used Live View's autofocus (by the way, the latter is very good!)- I also experimented with using autofocus fine tune on individual lenses. On the second two cameras (i.e. the replacements), I did all of the above and then repeated after setting the appropriate AF Fine Tune per lens. AF Fine Tune, in some cases, seemed to reduce the problem. However, I did not reduce it enough to make either camera's performance acceptable- So, this is literally hundreds of side by side comparisons across four cameras.Given the amount of reports on this problem on the internet, I suggest anyone wanting one of these cameras consider waiting until internet reports show purchasers regularly getting good cameras.Alternatively, if Nikon acknowledges the problem and guarantees new cameras don't have it or guarantees that they can fix it if one camera does have it, then I will try again and purchase another. In the mean time, I'm waiting. On the point of Nikon repairing the cameras, most of the online posts I have read indicate that Nikon service centers are not able to fix the problem at this time.For me personally, I was really looking forward to the upgrade from a D300. I really do want the D800/E to work! Instead, I've been really disappointed!Finally, a note on customer service...I purchased the D800s from Amazon and the D800Es through B&H. Both companies facilitated the camera returns and replacements. They were both supportive and helpful and did everything a purchaser could want when dealing with such a bad situation.Nikon seems to have been silent on this left autofocus issue, and that has NOT been to their credit. The good customer service provided by Amazon and B&H, in dealing with Nikon's
Скроменый эксперт
07.09.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have owned an original D70 since it's introduction. While very happy with it at the time, I always dreamed of moving to a full frame sensor camera sometime in the future. I have held out this long waiting for a camera like the D800. Initially though I was going to buy the D4. Impossible as it may seem I did not know the D800 was coming out. Once I discovered it was to be released soon and read some about it I changed my mind and put myself on the waiting list with Service Photo here in Maryland. I did not have to wait long.I got a call two days after release to come pick up my camera! I picked it up and rushed home to play with my new toy. I took it to several family events. The results were always decent. Of course, I used only the center focus point so I never saw any bad problems with focusing. My pictures were never tack sharp, always slightly soft. I rationalized it away to poor technique on my part.While on a photography outing with a friend we discussed the issue with focusing that my camera was displaying. He mentioned reading online about an issue with focusing on the D800. I resolved to research it more once home. The more I read, the more anxious I became.I went to Mansurovs Blog and read up on The Nikon D800 / D800E Asymmetric Focus Issue. I decided to perform the testing this site recommends. My camera failed, miserably. Using a Nikon 50mm f/1.4G lens to perform the testing I discovered the center focus point was soft. I, of course knew this already. The right focus point was even softer and the left focus point was simply horrible. Upset does not even describe how I felt.I was past the return period. It was suggested on many forums to return the camera to your local vendor and let them send it back for repair. I did not like this option as it means another set of hands between me and Nikon. I decided to send it in for repair directly myself.Many will probably say "Use the center focus point like you were and just use the camera as is." My answer to this statement is "I paid $3000 and deserve a camera that functions as advertised."I went to [...], logged into my account, and went to MY NIKON. I submitted a simple question to nikon. Where can I go on their site to check if my D800 is affected by the focus issue?I received this response the next day. "After researching your question about the D 800 focus problem that you are experiencing, we have received information in regards to the issue. Our service department has requested for you to send your camera in to be evaluated. Please use the below link to send your camera into Nikon. URL: [...] There is no need to call in advance for any approval or authorization; simply send the product in for evaluation with no accessories, unless part of the issue, and a photocopy of the receipt. Once logged in, service will send you a confirmation. Thank you for your patience. Nikon Technical Support."That link allows you to create an automated return form for your equipment. You need to properly pack your camera to protect from damage and include the following: 1. A copy of the packing list created from the link above. 2. Photocopy of your receipt. 3. Explanation letter.4. Optional (but should be done): A disk or an SD card with your test images to prove the problem. NOTE: Remove all accessories from your camera before sending! If you include a SD card with test images you will get it back. As a matter of fact I got back everything I sent in to the service center.I shipped the package to the Melville, NY Service Center on 7/30/2012. It was delivered the following day. It was not logged into their tracking system until 8/6/2012. Order Status: Order Accepted. Code was 25480, Serial 30039XX, Service Rank Repair B1, Category B1, Problem: Focus, Focus Issues-sample images included, TO GWO. Then came the wait...I presume because they had so many needing repair.Three days latter the order status changed to IN SHOP. It stayed this way until 8/17/2012 when I was verbally told the status was now AT QUALITY CHECK STATION. One day latter I received the camera and all material including paperwork and disk I sent in back via UPS. No damage to camera from their process at all. I was very happy so far. Attached my 50 and took some pictures of family indoors. WOW! We are talking Night and Day difference in camera's behavior. Focusing is snappy and dead on! Swapped to my 70-300mm f/4-5.6G. Before, this lens would "hunt" a lot. Now, it just snaps in focus, no hunting. I could not be happier now. Nikon has made me happy.So, in a nutshell. I am completely satisfied now with my new camera. The Nikon D800 is awesome. I am glad I bought it. It should have come out of the box perfect. It did not, but Nikon's Service Center made good on the repair and now I have what I believe is probably a D800 in better shape than most coming out of the box new, even if they have no apparent problems.I was anxious about shipping a $3K ca
Скроменый эксперт
22.12.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + качество картинки лучше всех камер. объем, детализация, красота - изображения "живые", очень удобные настройки для кнопок, прекрасный автофокус, в том числе и темноте, динамический диапазон хорош, камера для фотохудожника. цветопередача очень естественная
- - редко бывает муар, в виде фиолетовых всполохов. при одевании любой вспышки или - перелет фокуса более 20мм, значительно уменьшился после установки последней прошивки (3-5 мм на линейке и открытой "дырке"), при уменьшении отверстия диафрагмы до 3,5-4 объект всегда в фокусе. Энергоемкий. Очень требовательная к технике фотосъемки - легко получить микросмаз если выдержка не соответствует фокусному или ручки трясутся, баланс белого требует вдумчивого подхода при смешанном освещении. требует изучения материальной части камеры и теории фотографии
коментаторам поставившим этой камере 1-3 звездочки советую не расписываться в своей некомпетентности. вы не знаете зачем взяли ее в руки. А людям знающим предмет "фотографию", не ленивым в изучении теории и практики, а так же толстой инструкции для камеры я советую этот агрегат приобрести, а вместе с ним счастье ...
Скроменый эксперт
15.01.2016
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель, очень понравилось
- + Отличная фотокамера в умелых руках. О ее достоинствах много написано, но главное ее достоинство- качество картинки.
- - Фотокамера и оптика к ней дорогая. Но надо понимать, что за качество надо платить!
Перед покупкой определиться, для чего данную фотокамеру покупаешь. Этот тонкий и сложный инструмент не для любителя начального уровня, а для продвинутого любителя и профессионала.
Скроменый эксперт
06.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Матрица (тянет картинку из того, что, казалось бы, не предназначено для вытягивания). Позволяет ресайзить, что еще больше улучшает картинку, после определенных манипуляций.
- - Матрица (мой не самый мощный компьютер крутит пальцем у виска и недоуменно спрашивает: "ты дурак?! как я должен ворочать такой размер равов?!" (сжатие без потерь) Скорее, это мой нищебродский недостаток.
Использую три дня. Хватило вполне, чтобы все понять про аппарат. До него основной камерой был д300. Так же иногда пользовался д700. Пейзаж не снимал, про разрешение, мыло по краям и т.п. сказать ничего не могу. Мое - это коммерческий репортаж, концерты, дети.
В руке лежит удобнее д700, чуть хуже чем д300. Кнопки все на месте, за небольшим исключением. Видоикатель на 5+. После д300 очень радует крышка отсека с разъемами для USB. Нет фиксатора крышки отсека карт памяти, хотя сама она ни разу у меня не открылась за 5-6 часов съемки.
В общем, если вам удобно и привычно было работать с д300 и д700, то и здесь проблем с эргономикой никаких не возникнет. Балтблок (не родной) сразу снял. Без него удобнее оказалось.
Наконец-то понял для чего создан мой 16-35 f4!!! Обычный старенький полтинник тоже порадовал. 85 мм 1,8 Не особо отличается от использования на кропе.
Шумит. Да, это не д4. Картинка не кристальна, но это не та каша что была на д300 от ИСО 800 и выше. Это праздник какой-то просто! Если Вы сторонник обработки рав в Лайтруме 4, скажем, и спокойно переживаете унылый цвет, им выдаваемый в отношении НЕФов, то в награду Вы получаете НЕЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИ АККУРАТНУЮ работу с шумом и деталями. ИСО 3200 переваривается вполне удобоваримо, ИСО 1600 превращается в меленький аккуратный НЕ ЦВЕТНОЙ песочек. Если как надо ресайзить в фотошопе, балдеешь еще больше и понимаешь для чего еще надо 36 Мп кроме большой печати. Родной редактор шумы ест похуже, весьма хуже, прямо скажем. Но цвет ...
Детализация просто поражает. Видно не то что каждую ресничку, видно даже днк. Хотя, на д300 детализация не хуже в принципе.
Итак: после д300 - прорыв. Если думаете, менять или нет - НЕ ДУМАЙТЕ. Меняйте. Если у вас д700 - подумайте. По шумам и ДД много не выиграете, по разрешению, да, но оно Вам так надо ли? Потянет за собой траты на компьютер. К слову, я свой д800 купил у товарища практически новый. Он у него лежал, а снимал он в основном на д700. На 800 снимал только в студии и ля рекламы.
В руке лежит удобнее д700, чуть хуже чем д300. Кнопки все на месте, за небольшим исключением. Видоикатель на 5+. После д300 очень радует крышка отсека с разъемами для USB. Нет фиксатора крышки отсека карт памяти, хотя сама она ни разу у меня не открылась за 5-6 часов съемки.
В общем, если вам удобно и привычно было работать с д300 и д700, то и здесь проблем с эргономикой никаких не возникнет. Балтблок (не родной) сразу снял. Без него удобнее оказалось.
Наконец-то понял для чего создан мой 16-35 f4!!! Обычный старенький полтинник тоже порадовал. 85 мм 1,8 Не особо отличается от использования на кропе.
Шумит. Да, это не д4. Картинка не кристальна, но это не та каша что была на д300 от ИСО 800 и выше. Это праздник какой-то просто! Если Вы сторонник обработки рав в Лайтруме 4, скажем, и спокойно переживаете унылый цвет, им выдаваемый в отношении НЕФов, то в награду Вы получаете НЕЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИ АККУРАТНУЮ работу с шумом и деталями. ИСО 3200 переваривается вполне удобоваримо, ИСО 1600 превращается в меленький аккуратный НЕ ЦВЕТНОЙ песочек. Если как надо ресайзить в фотошопе, балдеешь еще больше и понимаешь для чего еще надо 36 Мп кроме большой печати. Родной редактор шумы ест похуже, весьма хуже, прямо скажем. Но цвет ...
Детализация просто поражает. Видно не то что каждую ресничку, видно даже днк. Хотя, на д300 детализация не хуже в принципе.
Итак: после д300 - прорыв. Если думаете, менять или нет - НЕ ДУМАЙТЕ. Меняйте. Если у вас д700 - подумайте. По шумам и ДД много не выиграете, по разрешению, да, но оно Вам так надо ли? Потянет за собой траты на компьютер. К слову, я свой д800 купил у товарища практически новый. Он у него лежал, а снимал он в основном на д700. На 800 снимал только в студии и ля рекламы.
Скроменый эксперт
12.08.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Детализация фотографий
Один из лучших фотоаппаратов Nikon. Великолепная студийная камера, позволяющая делать фотографии http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149451/ с огромным количеством деталей. Конечно, если фотографировать облака и туманы, то количество пикселей не принципиально.
Если нужны портреты с обработкой каждого волоска и реснички - эта камера может сделать идеальную http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149443/ детализацию.
То же самое и в пейзажах, если нужны http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149232/ подробности.
В условиях неплохой и средней освещённости Nikon D800 может быть и шикарной репортажной камерой, так как фокусировка достаточно быстрая.
Что такое репортаж? Это фото, на котором хотелось бы всё-таки что-то рассмотреть, и желательно поподробнее.
В такой ситуации 36 Мп очень http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149268/ кстати.
Через 2 месяца почти ежедневной эксплуатации проявились неисправности: не полностью выключалась камера и разряжался аккумулятор, и был нарушен контакт с батарейной ручкой.
В Сервисе, однако, по гарантии за 4 дня всё бесплатно починили, заменив главный блок фотоаппарата.
Видео камера пишет идеально, и качество картинки в видео намного выше, чем у обычной любительской видеокамеры.
Но автофокус в видео наводится не сразу, не автоматически, как у видеокамеры.
Камера Nikon D800 даёт очень сочную и подробную картинку - это просто мечта для творческого фотографа.
Если нужны портреты с обработкой каждого волоска и реснички - эта камера может сделать идеальную http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149443/ детализацию.
То же самое и в пейзажах, если нужны http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149232/ подробности.
В условиях неплохой и средней освещённости Nikon D800 может быть и шикарной репортажной камерой, так как фокусировка достаточно быстрая.
Что такое репортаж? Это фото, на котором хотелось бы всё-таки что-то рассмотреть, и желательно поподробнее.
В такой ситуации 36 Мп очень http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/u200/album/149268/ кстати.
Через 2 месяца почти ежедневной эксплуатации проявились неисправности: не полностью выключалась камера и разряжался аккумулятор, и был нарушен контакт с батарейной ручкой.
В Сервисе, однако, по гарантии за 4 дня всё бесплатно починили, заменив главный блок фотоаппарата.
Видео камера пишет идеально, и качество картинки в видео намного выше, чем у обычной любительской видеокамеры.
Но автофокус в видео наводится не сразу, не автоматически, как у видеокамеры.
Камера Nikon D800 даёт очень сочную и подробную картинку - это просто мечта для творческого фотографа.
Скроменый эксперт
15.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
As a background, I've been shooting SLRs for nearly 35 years. I've owned and loved my Nikon D300, battery grip, and Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 and 14-24mm f/2.8 lenses for nearly 5 years. I was ready to upgrade to a "hybrid" stills and video camera, but my primary passion is stills photography.Like most folks, I was extremely excited about the D800 when it was announced, but paused as it became clear that there were some manufacturing problems that were being sorted out. I waited a year and recently purchased a D800 body with serial 305xxx from Amazon, thinking that surely the left-focus issue was behind us. I was incorrect.I received the camera, charged the battery, put it on a tripod, and tested the left focus sensors. The problem was glaringly present, obvious without a fancy test. My camera body appears to be manufactured in June of 2012 based on the factory date setting and the firmware update. I put it through a few tests to see how bad the problem really was then decided that the camera body was going back. Discounting the left-focus problem, here are my observations from my brief tests:Image quality: Simply, utterly amazing (when you use the center focus point). Dynamic range is remarkable. For pros and serious amateurs it would seem the image quality is the best you can purchase in this form factor today. The high ISO noise performance is every bit as good as the 5D Mark III per sensor area (not to be confused with per pixel noise performance, which is not a useful metric these days). At the end of the day, some might argue that stills image quality is all that matters, and the D800 has this nailed.Autofocus: Seems only slightly different than the D300, with one exception. Face detection through the viewfinder actually works and seems to aid not only candid photography, but also sports/action where faces can be detected. This feature does not require Live View. I didn't upgrade the camera to the new firmware release, but I understand this improves AF even more. Good-to-great AF over all.Ergonomics: The camera is BEEFY but the grip is remarkably small. The grip finger grooves on this full-frame camera can fit only 2.5 out of 3 not-overly-large fingers. Also the little thumb groove on the back is barely present, so it feels a bit like holding a 2x4--not terribly confidence inspiring without a neck strap. The exposure mode dial is far too tight, not readily adjustable with my thumb like my D300. I do like the new AF-S/AF-C control button and dials, which seems like a nice improvement over my D300. The mode button has been moved to make room for an unnecessary video record button. Why the extra video button when you already have a video mode?Video quality: Moire/aliasing was present when I took my first video of some yellow-pad notebook paper that I taped upon on the wall to test for possible focus problems. Not sure why this wasn't fixed in the latest firmware release. The necessary low-pass filter (anti-aliasing) algorithms are well established in the embedded DSP industry and should be possible to employ in-camera with no great difficulty, as evidenced by the D5200 and D7100. The only real obstacle to solving this otherwise easily avoidable problem (in any camera) is inadequate processor performance.Overall: I'm not sure why Nikon hasn't taken the high road with their customers regarding their recent manufacturing problems. It would seem their lack of transparency (more than anything else) has created a real customer flight risk and business problem for the company. Prior to Nikon's handling of the D800 and the D600 manufacturing problems, switching to Canon had never crossed my mind. Today as I try to upgrade my Nikon body, it has become a real possibility for me. I really hope the next D800 body is a good one. I will know tomorrow.======================================UPDATE: Second D800 body serial number 305xxx has the same left focus defect and cannot focus correctly using the left focus sensors. It is also going back.======================================
Скроменый эксперт
07.07.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
It makes me very sad to write this review as I am a confirmed Nikon user. I had waited several months, like most people for my D800. I have read a lot of reviews that have praised the camera for its outstanding images and resolution and many that express frustration over the "green tint" and the "left focus" issue. I have not experienced the green tint but my camera does suffer from very pronounced issues with the left focus point. I will try to cover some new ground in this review that has not been covered in other reviews that I have read, mainly that when I say the left focus point, what I really mean, and I don't think that others have articulated this, is that it is the column of all three left focus points that are affected. At least that is true in my case. The center is razor sharp. I tested with a 24-70 at 2.8 and flash to remove camera shake issues. Nikon has asked me to submit samples and they were very nice about it. I am torn as to whether to submit the camera for repair or to return it.On the positive side the camera does pretty much everything else superbly. Great handling. Beautiful color. Responsive. It really does put medium format performance in a dslr form factor. Truly incredible.I know a lot of people have trashed the D800 with 1 star over this issue and I personally disagree with that. I think 3 stars is fair because this is not such a minor issue that a one star deduction would be appropriate, nor should it overshadow all the amazing things this camera does. I will own one at some point. It's just a matter of whether it is this one or one that is produced after a fix is in place. That all being said, the D800 is a complex piece of technology and the reality is that just about everything that relies on technology today requires adjustments. This includes everything from computer software to a Mercedes. I hope this review comes across as fair and balanced as I want it to be.====Update====Nikon looked at my images on Wednesday after I submitted them on Saturday which I think is pretty darn good turn around for a big company. The rep that I spoke with readily acknowledged the issue and immediately sent me an email with instructions on how to send the camera in for repair. I can't really ask for more than that. Yes, I would have liked for it to be perfect out of the box but Nikon is being very responsive and courteous. My only word of advice is to call them early or at off hours. In the afternoon the hold times can be long. I will update this review as things unfold.=======Update 7/24/2012=========I now have the D800 back from Nikon. I tested it today and while there is about a 65% improvement in the left focus point performance it does not match the focus of the center points. This is apparent to non-technical viewers who were asked to look at images on screen without being told which was the "good" one in advance. Each time the viewer picked the left focus point images as less well focused. They also felt that a left focus point image from the original batch prior to Nikon servicing the camera was less well focused than the new, post repair, left focus point images. On some images quite honestly I felt like I was pixel peeping and that the difference between the center and the left was quite small, while on others it was glaring. My concern is that for some portraits that it would be an annoyance. Just out of curiosity I mounted the same 24-70 on my old D200 and shot the same series of test images. What I found is that even on the D200 there is a perceptible difference in focus quality between the left and center. Again this was confirmed by a "blinded" subject. I have always been thrilled with the pictures from my D200. I have carried it on five continents and taken some of the best pictures of my life with it. I never noticed the "left focus issue". I think that there is a difference with the D800. Part of the appeal is the amount of detail in the image and the slightest imperfections in focus are more apparent than with a camera like the D200. Considering all of this and the fact that I really can't afford to upgrade my DSLR's less than every 7 or so years, I have decided to return the camera tomorrow and try another copy in the near future. As I said at the beginning of my review I am a dyed in the wool Nikon fan and my experience with the D800 has not been a great one. My D4 on the other hand is fantastic. I will be posting that review soon.========Update 7/25/2012========Returned original D800 today. Happened to check online to see if by some miracle a local Best Buy in the city had one. The one closest to me did not but one on the East Side did. I went and purchased it and brought it home for testing. Sadly it has the same problem. I ran basically the same set of tests on the camera and it had the same left focus issue. I not only showed the problem at f2.8, it exhibited the problem all the way to f5.6. This is why I have lowered my rating to two stars. If the camera worked as it
Скроменый эксперт
09.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have used the D700 bodies extensively over the past two years and I've grown accustomed to them like my own hands. The D700 has been hands down the best DSLR I've used during its time. I shoot weddings professionally and I almost always carry two D700 bodies on me - and thus weight quickly adds up when you carry the 2 bodies along with lenses and flashes, which makes it nearly impossible for me to use the D3/D4 series. The D700 has been a blessing with the right balance of nearly everything.How quickly has time gone by and now the D700 is giving way to the D800. Some say that the D800 isn't exactly the successor to the D700 - and after the initial tests of my own, I tend to agree.By now I'm sure you have seen countless reviews of this camera so I'm not going to bother telling you what's so good about it.Instead, I'll focus on the main differences comparing to the D700.My initial reactions holding the camera:- The body feels lighter, not by much, but definitely lighter- The grip feels different. Initially I think I still prefer the D700 grip better since the D800 grip feels fatter where your right index finger lies, not exactly a good thing for people with small/medium hands.- There is now an additional video record button near the shutter release button up top which is awesome,- but then that also moved the Mode Button which I often use, and they made the button smaller to make way for the video record button. This will take a little to get used to.My initial reactions looking through the viewfinder:- The +/- indicators are inverted by default (inverted by the usual Nikon standard: + / 0 / - )- After a little digging it can be reversed in the Menu- There is now TWO virtual horizon indicators helping you level the camera rotating left/right, and tilting up/down - this is absolutely awesome and extremely useful.My initial handing the camera:- The 8-direction cursor button is more recessed, making it harder to accidentally hit the center button but I feel like the directional arrows are a tad harder to press- They reversed the positions of the (+) and (-) buttons on the left side making it more like the newer DSLRs. I'll be pressing the wrong button for a couple months before I adapt to this.- The focus mode button on the back is now gone, I accidentally pressed that old button on the D700 many times,- In place of it there's now a dedicated Live View button and there's an ambient light sensor next to it,- that sensor allows the camera to control the LCD monitor brightness automatically. It's an excellent implementation and seemingly work very well during my initial testings.- The D700 mode dial on the left had ISO, Qual, and WB; while the D800 now has an addition of BKT (bracketing) button there also. However they put BKT in place of ISO, and now ISO moved towards the back of the camera where there was nothing on the D700. This again, is something that will take time to get used to.- The AF mode toggle is changed to more like the D7000. The D700 has S (static), C (continuous), and M (manual), and this new one is either AF or M. There's a small button on top of the toggle that you hold down to change focus mode - you use the command dial and sub command dial to change between AF-S and AF-C; 3D tracking, 9-point, 21-point, 51-point, single point. I'll just have to say it's different. The good: you can see what you're changing through the viewfinder - I like especially the "3D" indication when you change into AF-C 3D tracking they used the 51 on the focusing screen to draw out "3D" which makes it very easy to see without having to look at the top LCD panel or digging into the Menu. This is a huge thing 'cause now you can easily change focus mode without taking your eye off the viewfinder and actually see what you're doing as you change focus modes.- I feel like my eye has to aim a little lower as I look through the viewfinder, again something to get used to.- The lock button when not reviewing picture is now dedicated to Picture Control - making it much easier to access- The autofocus assist light is very very bright!My initial findings using the camera:- image quality is amazing- the RAW files are huge... I find myself handing 40-50MB RAW images and my 16GB CF cards are no longer sufficient- LiveView is very easy to use and going into LiveView mode is very responsive.- For some reasons shooting pictures in LiveView keeps the shutter open for 3 seconds even when I'm shooting even 1/50 sec, making it hard to recognize when exactly the camera is shooting. I'm rather confused about whether this is by design or is it actually a bug.- Dual card slot is a nice addition, but I'm not sure if I'll be heavily relying on this or not given the file size is already so big. I may end up getting huge SD cards to have it capture JPG as a form of backup instead of having the SD also store RAW.- 16GB cards store roughly 200 RAW pictures from what the camera estimates, ouch. This is based on 14-bit RAW files and lo
гайнутдинов игорь
18.01.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + качество картинки лучше всех камер. объем, детализация, красота - изображения "живые", очень удобные настройки для кнопок, прекрасный автофокус, в том числе и темноте, динамический диапазон хорош, камера для фотохудожника. цветопередача очень естественная
- - редко бывает муар, в виде фиолетовых всполохов. при одевании любой вспышки или - перелет фокуса более 20мм, значительно уменьшился после установки последней прошивки (3-5 мм на линейке и открытой "дырке"), при уменьшении отверстия диафрагмы до 3,5-4 объект всегда в фокусе. Энергоемкий. Очень требовательная к технике фотосъемки - легко получить микросмаз если выдержка не соответствует фокусному или ручки трясутся, баланс белого требует вдумчивого подхода при смешанном освещении...
Скроменый эксперт
26.04.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
_*********************************************************** Update 04/15/2013: This update is for event shooters/photojournalists.** Enthusiasts, hobbyists, still life and landscape professionals can skip down to my original review below and call it a 5-star camera.**********************************************************After a year of ownership with three bodies, these are my final thoughts. This is the best landscape or studio DSLR in the market. Other than not having a mode dial with Custom User Settings (U1, U2) like the D7000, this camera has near perfect ergonomics.However, I do not recommend the D800 for paid work that have once in a lifetime moments, such as capturing the first kiss at a wedding or truly spontaneous moments, because there is a high probability of missing focus. When situations have no do-overs, equipment inadequacies are not an option. This is the reason why I stopped searching for a "good copy" of the optically superior Sigma 35mm 1.4 and settled for the more reliable Canon.I have had both bodies and a replacement body (serial 3041XXX) "fixed" by Nikon and they felt the last fixes were good enough. Good enough, I did not invest $18,000 into a system for good enough! Without getting into the whole left side autofocus (AF) saga, which is readily available on other reviews and websites, the AF is horribly inconsistent even with the latest firmware (A: 1.01/B:1.02) using the center AF sensor.My percentage of focused photos took a massive dive with this camera; I tried compensating by closing down the aperture a few stops, but the increase in depth-of-field area was not always enough. With the D3/D700, I would wait for moments and capture it with one shot. The D800 missed focus often enough that I began shooting in spray n' pray style, however, often the focused photo was not what I wanted. Creating the dilemma, do I give the client a great moment that is out of focus by meters or a ho-hum moment in focus? When I owned the D3 and D700, I used to shoot 500-1000 photos per event, I was taking 3,000-5,000 photos with the D800. This MASSIVE increase of photos created a workflow nightmare and my quality of work suffered (subjects centered, ISO's in the 12,800-25,600 range to allow for smaller apertures).Autofocus problems only get worse when in AF-C, if shooting a person walking towards the camera at a slow to medium pace in the F/1.4-2.0 range, expect 1 out of 10 perfectly focused, 1-2 acceptable, and the rest throwaways. Stop down to F/5.6 and at best it's 50/50. I took a huge financial hit switching to Canon (selling used, buying new), however, my two Canon 5D MkIII's get 7 perfectly focused, 2 acceptable, and about 1 throwaway running the same test of a person walking towards the camera. Stop down one or two stops for near perfect results.Nikon does many things better than Canon. In body AF Assist Light, intervalometer, spot metering based on AF point, intelligent Auto ISO, better AF position selector, better access to flash options, and many more. Overall, less menu digging, and obviously Nikon's megapixel advantage is nice for cropping.The ten plus (I actually lost count) trips to Nikon service centers can attest just how much I wanted this camera to work. Nikon customer service is beyond atrocious and their technicians are incompetent. Maybe a few years into production, new D800s will be adequate, but I will never know because I do not see myself buying Nikon again.The Canon 5D MkIII's sensor has less dynamic range, 1.3 bits less color space, but those 24 bits it does have are beautiful colors that require less post-processing for nice skin tones. Because I am confident that the AF will not miss, I am now shooting 300-600 photos per event, that plus less time in post. My turnaround went from 4-6 weeks (culling missed focus photos and fixing color) to only 2-7 days with the inferior Canon. My clients are happier because they are getting their photos fast. In the end, I prefer focused images taken by an average sensor, than a blurred images taken with a sensor with all the dynamic range and megapixels in the world.BOTTOM LINE:The D800 is perfect for photographers that shoot landscapes with Zeiss lenses, people that like having subjects perfectly centered, or autofocus then recompose photos in the F/5.6-11 range. However, if you shoot wide open with fast primes and not getting the "shot" puts yourself or company at risk, look into another camera. If my livelihood did not depend on camera equipment, I would have stayed with Nikon. However, in my line of work there are no do-overs, thus the Nikon advantages gave way to its faults, and after struggling with Nikon's abysmal QC and CS in recent years (SB-900, D7000, D300s, three D800's, 28mm AFS 1.8, 35mm AFS 1.4) and reading about D600 issues. I will not be buying a Nikon for work anytime soon.********************************************** Original Review*********************************************Below are my ob
Скроменый эксперт
04.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm a Sony shooter with only a few lenses. I use to shoot Canon during the film days. I tested both the Canon 5D mkIII and the Nikon D800 and here are my results. I tested a 5DmkIII with a 24-70 f2.8 lens and a Nikon D800 (not D800e) with a 24-70 f2.8 lens.High ISO:About the same, except D800 has a lot more detail to work with. In Lightroom, I can save a higher percentage of ISO 6400 shots because the D800 has more detail. Canon seems cleaner initially in Lightroom but when the picture fits into a 24" 1920x1080 monitor or a 64" Samsung plasma TV, the Nikon looks a tad cleaner, noise less noticeable. I think the Canon looks cleaner in Lightroom because it is just a smaller picture. But displaying ISO 6400 shots on a monitor or TV, Nikon looks nicer in general. Both cameras at ISO 12,800 look awful and not recoverable in Lightroom. It might look acceptable as a really small pic but why the heck would you buy an expensive camera to display crappy looking pictures?Frames per second:Easy winner. Canon can shoot 6 FPS, Nikon 4 FPS. However, in practice I think 4 FPS is pretty good. None of these cameras are really Olympic style sports cameras.Resolution:Easy winner. Nikon's RAW files are more detailed, almost 3D like. I can't really explain it other than the pictures look more real. I can crop a photo to 1/3 it's size (12 megapixels) and it still looks stunning. I wonder how much better the D800e version is. I'll have to wait until my friend receives his to find out.JPEG:Easy winner. Out of the camera, the Canon JPEGs are phenomenal. The processing done is quite remarkable.RAW:Easy winner. If you shoot RAW, Nikon is it. Also there is an issue with the Canon with the color red. I think the color is overblown at times because all the details are loss and not recoverable in Lightroom. Not always but it has happened at least twice. The same photo on the Nikon kept all the details.Autofocus:About the same. Canon and Nikon have awesomely quick autofocus and I couldn't determine a difference. The only caveat is that Nikon focuses better in lowlight (without the autofocus assist lamp) and also the Nikon focuses when there is almost no light (with the autofocus assist lamp). Why the heck doesn't Canon include an autofocus assist lamp is beyond me. Also, Nikon's face detection is extremely useful because it focuses right on the eyeballs.Flash:Easy winner. Canon doesn't have built in flash. Nikon flash worked surprisingly well.Dynamic Range:Easy winner. Nikon knocked it out of the park. I got a lot less blown highlights with shots with white clothing and more realistic blue skys. Also, there is a lot more headroom on both the highlights and shadows on the Nikon when editing in Lightroom. How did Nikon have better shadows and highlights! They have to share some of that technology!Video:Suprisingly about the same. I would have thought that Canon's lead in video would maintain. Surprisingly, the Nikon's video was just as awesome as the Canon. Nikon's video has a bit more detail and is definitely a little sharper than the Canon. I didn't test Nikon's uncompressed HDMI out, although it seems to be a useful feature (this is like RAW HDMI output for video). Canon should adopt uncompressed HDMI out also.Price:Easy winner. Why anyone (who doesn't already have Nikon or Canon lenses) would buy this Canon for $500 more than the Nikon would need to think twice. I can see why the Nikon is selling so much better than the Canon, at least on Amazon.Comfort:Both about the same weight. Both feel nice in the hand. Canon possibly slightly more comfortable if you have bigger hands. Nikon maybe more comfortable with smaller hands. Both are fine though.USB transfer:Nikon wins with USB 3.0. Skipping the card reader altogether by just plugging in the camera to the computer is convenient. Also the transfer speed is much much faster than Canon's older USB 2.0. This saves a lot of time.LCD Screen:Canon has slightly better screen in direct sunlight (LCD facing up towards the sun). Nikon is better when the LCD is not directly facing the sun. Nikon's screen is crisper and more 3D like.Weatherproofing:My last day of shooting was in a light mist/drizzle. I was shooting both cameras again for about 20 minutes when the Canon 5D mkIII developed some fogging inside the viewfinder screen. I could not wipe it away as it seemed to be inside the camera. I could no longer take pictures normally without live view. Nikon didn't have this problem and I continued to shoot the rest of the day with the Nikon in the same wet conditions without issue. I had planned to shoot at least 2 weeks with both cameras so this was definitely a bummer.Lenses:Both Canon and Nikon's 24-70 2.8 lenses are great. I would say the Canon 24-70 2.8 is just a tad faster on focus. Nikon is slightly sharper in the corners. Both Nikon and Canon seem to have a very comparable lens assortment (although my wallet won't be happy buying so many new lenses!)Well, after using both cameras for about a week
Скроменый эксперт
25.08.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I honestly would have bought this camera if it wasn't for all the issues that happen that is of no fault of the user. But because of this, I own a 5d instead and there are no issues at all with it.There is one huge difference that separates Nikon from Canon when it comes to fixing problems that occur when they get screened by the public. Canon acknowledges the issue and then fixes it. They don't wait to update that model for next year or the next few years. Nikon does not do this. If there's a problem with your camera they will not even acknowledge there's problems that need to be addressed and they will not fix it in their product line until an updated camera comes out to replace the one with the issues.Canon had a flawed Light Leak issue that went on dpreview when people started to report metering changes from the back of the camera. Canon acknowledged this and fixed it right away. All subsequent models were updated so this was NOT an issue for later models after it was fixed and it was also ingrained in the serial which ones were fixed and which ones might still be affected.Nikon has known about the oil spots / dust on the sensor for a long time since it went viral on a youtube video and when dpreview reported it to millions of people who viewed the site. That was back more than 9 months ago. But it's not just the d600 it's with a good number of Nikon's products. The d800 has a bad left focus point. It's white balance is off and it casts a green screen tint that is not up to viewing spec when you want to accurately gauge what the picture might turn out. In the production world this is called monitoring and without a monitor, you have no clue what the output will become when you capture it. Sadly it's not even these two cameras. The d5100 (a recent camera came out 2011) had malfunctions where the image would go entirely black even though the camera was still taking photos, this was a malfunction and there was no fix for this issued by nikon. Users of that camera just had to wait for it to be updated with the d5200. Nikon did not care about the customers who bought the d5100 and never fixed the issue. Not just cameras that suffer from these issues, but their flashes as well. it's been known that Nikon's $500+ SB-900 flash was overheating and needed a lengthy time to cool down. This was a big problem and a lot of users complained about it. But Nikon doesn't fix it, they ignore it and wait for the release of the update where the problem gets addressed. And they don't lose money and probably make more money because everyone who was tired of the SB-900 overheating just went to buy the SB-910, so they probably doubled their profits because they got to sell 2 flashes to the same individual.Nikon just does not care about it's customers. Until they start treating their customers with respect you should not have faith that what you bought has been screened and assured that it will not have some type of issue or malfunction because Nikon is strict with its warranty even though it knows of flaws that come out of certain products.
Маринер Маринер
27.01.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Довольно шустрый АФ, дд, съемка видео (даже звук нра)
- - ББ "на воздухе" никуда не годится, добиться правильного, если вы не упёртый никонист со стажем, которому и так всё нравится, или просто опытный фотограф ))), довольно сложно.
Далеко не всякий объектив может разрешить матрицу такого размера.
При использовании брекетинга по экспозиции шаг не больше 1EV, а мне бы хотелось 2... Неудобно снимать 5 тяжеленных кадров, вместо 3-х у 5дм2
Купил в пару к кенону 5дм2, как пейзажную камеру. Пользую в основном с 16-35/4G (не нравится, о чем на я.маркете уже писал), реже с 50/1.8G (отличный, хоть...
Скроменый эксперт
11.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Потрясающее качество изображения - цветопередача, динамический ДИАПАЗОН, детализация на высоких ISO. Автофокус просто великолепный, значительно лучше, чем на моём старом D7000 (хотя и на нем неплохой), практически не мажет даже при слабом освещении.
- - Ремешок мог быть поцевильнее))) когда купите, поймете о чём я.
На второй день заметил 1 горячий пиксель, запустил очистку матрицы (при этом происходит ремапинг) - всё исчезло. Но это всетаки не недостаток, ибо идеальных матриц без заблокированных битых\горячих пикселей в природе не бывает.
Шумы заметны с ISO 800 (немножко).
На ISO 1600-3200 они достаточно сильные, НО т.к. матрица имеет 36МП, то при использовании шумодавов и уменьшении размера изображения (до 10-15 МП), картинка получается с отличной детализацией, не хуже, чем снятая, например, на D7000 при ISO 400-640. Если требуются высокие ISO, то можно сразу уменьшить размер изображения в настройках (3680 x 2456 это 9МП, во многих случаях их достаточно), тогда за счет объединения пикселей шумы будут значительно ниже.
Многие пишут, что из-за 36МП требуются более короткие выдежки, иначе смаз, но лично я этого вообще не заметил.
Кстати выбирая между 800 и 800Е я предпочел первую модель, т.к. у 800Е муар всетаки намного заметнее, особенно на свадебных платьях и костюмах женихов!
Покупайте, не пожалеете!!!
На ISO 1600-3200 они достаточно сильные, НО т.к. матрица имеет 36МП, то при использовании шумодавов и уменьшении размера изображения (до 10-15 МП), картинка получается с отличной детализацией, не хуже, чем снятая, например, на D7000 при ISO 400-640. Если требуются высокие ISO, то можно сразу уменьшить размер изображения в настройках (3680 x 2456 это 9МП, во многих случаях их достаточно), тогда за счет объединения пикселей шумы будут значительно ниже.
Многие пишут, что из-за 36МП требуются более короткие выдежки, иначе смаз, но лично я этого вообще не заметил.
Кстати выбирая между 800 и 800Е я предпочел первую модель, т.к. у 800Е муар всетаки намного заметнее, особенно на свадебных платьях и костюмах женихов!
Покупайте, не пожалеете!!!
Корнелия
01.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Самый самый лучший!!!
- + Дрстоинства все сюда конечно не поместятся, поэтому напишу самые главные по моему мнению. И так, во-первых, это качество самого корпуса аппарата. Не могу сказать, что он легкий. Наоборот, ОЧЕНЬ большой и тяжелый. Но метериалы очень и очень качественные, все закрыто от пыли и влаги. Во-вторых, мне очень понравилась его эргономика, расположение кнопок очень удобное, программируете как хотите. Это что касается внешнего вида без учитывания различных нюансов. Фотографии, которые он делает, не могут оставить равнодушным никого! Они великолепны! 36 мегапикселов показали себя во всей красе, это действительно высший класс. На изображениях видно каждую деталь, цвета просто невероятные. Видеосъемка тоже не может не радовать. Им можно целые фильмы симать! Кроме того, сам фотоаппарат очень быстрый, умный, быстро настраивается. Главное достоинство фотоаппарата - это конечно же его полноформатная матрица. В общем...
- - Какие могут быть недостатки у этой модели? Даже не знаю, что написать, частно. Конечно, это не D4 или не какая-небудь супер-репортажная фотокамера, но это все-равно профессиональный класс. Из недостатков могут быть только шумы, которые появляются на фотографиях во время ночной съемки. Да и то, мне кажется, это все выдумки, которые придумали лохи, сидящие на разного рода форумах. Лично я никаких дефектов и неисправностей не замечала. Его достоинства перекроют любые мелкие недостатки.
От этой камеры у меня столько хороших впечатлений, что словами их просто не передать! Люди спорили, спорят и будут спорить, какой аппарат лучше - Nikon D800 или Canon 5D mark 3. Пусть спорят! Я ни разу не пожалела, что взяла именно D800 и нискольно не сомневаюсь, что выбор мой был правильным. Но кто уж слишком привык к Кэнону, может взять марк 3. А лучше подержать обо аппарата в руках и самому опредилить, что для вас лучше.
Сушков Юрий
13.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Шустрый автофокус, звенящая резкость, эргономика
- - Не обнаружил
На днях стал счастливым обладателем этой камеры. До этого использовал д700, решил запастись второй тушкой. Часто слышал такое мнение, что разница после д700 будет не такая большая, и проявится лишь в более детализированной картинке и еще в некоторых мелочах (не пишу о том, сколько я прочитал "недостатков" этой камеры, таких как "непригодность к репортажу", "увесистые равы", "неудобный хват" и.т.д и.т.п
Итак, теперь мое мнение. После д700 разницу почувствовал, и причем существенную (сравнение):
1) Более легкий вес (легче ненамного, а все равно приятно. И когда таскаешь его весь день, то ценишь данное изменение)
2) В полном мере проявил себя с оптикой, с которой д700 давал не совсем хорошие результаты, а именно Tokina 16-28 2.8 стал радовать такой резкостью картинки на закрытых значениях диафрагмы, и боке при открытой дырке, что я с первого снимка влюбился в этот объектив, который думал было продавать и брать другой ширик (никоновский). Nikkor 80-200 2.8 тоже...
Итак, теперь мое мнение. После д700 разницу почувствовал, и причем существенную (сравнение):
1) Более легкий вес (легче ненамного, а все равно приятно. И когда таскаешь его весь день, то ценишь данное изменение)
2) В полном мере проявил себя с оптикой, с которой д700 давал не совсем хорошие результаты, а именно Tokina 16-28 2.8 стал радовать такой резкостью картинки на закрытых значениях диафрагмы, и боке при открытой дырке, что я с первого снимка влюбился в этот объектив, который думал было продавать и брать другой ширик (никоновский). Nikkor 80-200 2.8 тоже...
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 618.
