Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000

Love this camera! I upgraded from a Nikon D70s and the sum of little features and improvements add up to a big difference. The ability to get info from the control panel on the large monitor is very helpful in low-light situations. Putting the release mode (single shot, multiple exposures) on a separate dial is so much easier than going through the menu. The big monitor is clear and sharp. All my old Nikon lenses work fine. It just feels good in your hands. I think this is the ideal camera for an experienced amateur or a serious hobbyist.

I've been looking for over a year at Nikon digital SLRs. This one is a lighter weight and does everything you could ask for. I do Pet Photography and needed to upgrade from my old Nikon. I have always bought Nikons and love their durability and functions. This one does it all.

THE D7000, this Nikon camera is, just so incredible, every thing works so smooth. I own a Nikon D5100 and I love this camera but the D7000 is like a gem compared to it. The D7000 is so much easier to use, the exposure triangle is so easy to set with out going to menus. The D7000 takes the same great pictures as the D5100 but with better controls and more options.

I've been using a D90 for almost 3 years and just upgraded to the D7000. There are a couple of negatives I noticed right away. On the D90 in single point focus mode I could look at the top LCD display and see which one of the 11 sensors I was using. Then if I wanted to change it I could do so with out ever having to raise the camera up. On the D7000 the top LCD does not show this information, and you have to look at the rear display mode to find out. Another change I'm not happy about is the ISO-Auto feature, (this is not the same as Auto ISO). On the D90 I could add "ISO Senitivity" to "My Menu" and I had complete contol over the menu including the ISO-Auto feature. This is really handy when taking pictures at a show and the lighting is changing every second. On the D7000 I added ISO Sensitivity to "My Menu" but now I can only turn ISO-Auto on or off. On the D90 I could adjust the minimum and maxium ISO and shutter speeds, on the D7000 I can NOT. This is a major pain, b/c now I have to hunt down the menu item everytime I change lenses to adjust the minimum shutter speed. For professionals this might not be a big deal, they just switch cameras, but for the enthusized this camera is aimed at, it's a pain. Something else I noticed was that on the D90 I could change the recording folder name, but on the D7000 I can only change the folder number. For instance, on the D90 I could make a folder that said SHOW, GRAD, GTOR, etc, then when I went home I would know what pictures are in that folder. On the D7000 all I can do is change the folder from 100D7000 to 101D7000, 102D7000, 103D7000 etc. I'm sorry but 102D7000 doesn't tell me anything about what's in that folder. This might not be the correct place for it but the optional battery grip is also not as good as the D90's. On the D90 two batteries where in the grip and no batteries were in the actual camera itself. On the D7000's grip there is only one battery. On the D90 I could kill a battery, pop it out and put in a new one. This made it easy to rotate thru my batteries, now in order to remove the camera battery I have to completely remove the grip. I'm worried that one day I'll kill my grips battery and the camera battery will be dead too, b/c I was in a hurry and didn't have time to change it.There are not a lot of real positives that I see over the D90. True it has a 16MP sensor, 39 point autofocus system, expanded ISO range and a faster frame rate. Not to mention improved video capabilities, but I didn't buy this camera to shoot movies. These features aren't really that impressive. If my D90 hadn't died in a freak 6 year old accident (my son tried to take pictures of his goldfish up close and personal) I wouldn't have bought this camera. Don't get me wrong, it's a great camera and I'm sure I'll grow to love it in time, but if you already have a D90, I would hold on to it for now. Besides in about one year from now Nikon will probably be releasing an updated version(D7100??).

I Love my Nikon D7000, I needed a replacement for my D80. Its the most camera I could buy and I am happy withy it. It is fast, but it all depends on the lens in lower lighting. I definitely recommend it!

I found after using two of these for about 1.5 years, that the AF was about 80% good if you have decent technique.Oddly enough, it was with wider angle lenses that it was least accurate/consistent.

The Nikon D7000 is not a full-frame, or professional grade digital slr, but it comes very close to being professional grade. I have previously owned the Nikon D70, D40, and most recently D80. This is my favorite of the bunch and is light years ahead of the Nikon D80 it replaced.Like the D70 & D80, the D7000 buttons to adjust the white balance, and iso on the left side of the lcd display as opposed to having to adjust those settings from within the menu of the D3000 & D5000 lines. I will not purchase another digital slr that does not have the ability to manage all my exposure settings from the camera body.The quality is top-notch and produces some truly outstanding exposures. I have now combined the D7000 with the brand new Nikon 70-200 f/4G ED VR AF-S Nikkor Zoom Lens. The results are even better with a professional grade lens such as the 70-200 f/4.Nikon will likely be releasing an update the D7000 line within the next as they have already released newer versions in the D3000 & D5000 lines. The D3200 has already been released and the D5200 has just been released. I am comfortable using the D7000 for quite some time and the next time I upgrade it will be to a full-frame body. For the time being I have a quality kit and will be well prepared for the next couple of years. I do not believe the D7000 will become obsolete any time soon. While it will most certainly be updated the differences will be minuscule.The D7000 is an excellent digital slr and you won't be disappointed with purchasing this camera.

Let me start by saying that I am not a professional photographer. However I do have a good eye for clear pictures and colors. My friends and I have been Nikon users for past few years using D50, D200, and D70. Two of my friends bought D700 this summer and the results just blew me away and now I wanted one too. After spending countless hours on the internet and comparing sample pictures and reading reviews of D7000 and D700, I decided to give D7000 a chance and picked up the kit (just the body was not available) from a local Ritzcamera during the Thanksgiving weekend.So the Sunday of the tgiving weekend, my friend with D700 and I with my D7000 compared our two cameras side by side with same settings (apperture, WB, shutter, ISO, Fine quality, medium size, and other settings) and distance and took pics of a subject (a golden metal peacock with blue and green stones) to compare the results. We used a 35mm 1.8G on D7000 and a 50mm 1.4D lens on D700.The result - the pics on the "camera screen" for D7000 actually looked better than D700 "camera screen". On the D7000 screen the pics looked darker, sharper, and more clean. However, when we transferred the pics on the laptop then the D700 pics looked better. We compared pics on multiple ISO's from 1000 to 64000 and even H1. Each time we made sure the settings were identical. We compared pics at 100% size and D700 pics showed less noise at every ISO and were brighter and more natural in color. All the pics taken with ISO 6400 or higher were much better on D700. We took some face pics and D700 showed more details like skin pores and lip details whereas on D7000 the skin pores and lip details at 100% were not that great..kinda pixels breaking out. Even on the peacock the beak of the peacock was more clearly defined on D700 than the D7000. One thing we noticed that the golden, blue, and green shades on D700 were more vivid and were standing out more. Vice on D7000, the colors were there but didn't highlight as much. After playing with Irfanview software, I edited the saturation on D7000 pic and now the pic had more vividness than D7000. In a nutshell, I had to play with a software to bring more life to the pic.We also tested using the 'auto correct' (or something like that) feature on Irfanview software to see which pics from either of the two cameras require more editing. The result was that D700 required very little to none auto adjustment, whereas, the software corrected/edited almost all the D7000 pics.I am not sure if the larger CMOS sensor on D700 is the only thing that is making a big a difference in picture quality over D7000 or if Nikon hasn't declared any other details. Spec wise D7000 beats D700 on every other detail and D700 technology is 3years old so how come D700 is still delivering better pics than D7000? Is it just the sensor?All in all D700 is a better camera than D7000. But if you don't compare the two then D7000 is not bad. In my situation I have compared the two side by side so I know that I can get better quality pics with D700. So now I am going to return the D7000 and buy D700.The price difference is quiet a bit so for the price the D7000 is not bad, but if you can afford the difference then don't even think about D7000 and go for D700. But if you have a tight budget D7000 will make you happy too.The camera does feel solid, light, and overall great build quality. The menu options are almost identical to D700. Two card slots is a good thing, but really, how often does one run out of memory if you have a decent size card.The video quality at 1080 is great but you would need an external mic since the camera picks up the churning sound coming from the lens while it's trying to focus as you're making the video and it's quiet noticeable. The video feature does not replace the camcorder by any means. If you make long videos, you'll need a camcorder. This feature is rather useful in case where you don't have your camcorder with you and you need to make a quick short video. Also the autofocus feature sucks as it keeps on focusing in and out the moving subjects or as you move the camera.Hope this helps.

I love this camera. Haven't got a single problem. It is for those who want to move a level up from amateur photography. I had D5100 before this and used it for some 5 months but then I lost it. :( and got this one.

Great Camera. Got this before a trip to Africa to go on Safari. The Nikon D7000 is pretty easy to use if you're new to a DSLR. There are a bunch of automatic features/settings to make it easy. The controls for manual adjustments are pretty easy to learn with the help of the user manual. I was very happy with using the 18-200mm lense as an all purpose lense as you don't have time to switch out lenses on Safari. There were only a few times when my 8x binoculars needed to be used to get a better view that was too far for see through the camera viewfinder. The quality of the shots are so good that you can always zoom in and crop on the computer and the pictures are still really clear. The bag is very cushioned so I wasn't worried about the camera safety at all while travelling. It does become slightly big if you want to carry it around for day trips, so in those cases I just use a camera strap.

It was a tough decision to step up from my aged D7, but had to do it. Researched all the Nikons and competitors, then decided to go for the D7000. It proved to be the right decision. Over the intervening 10 years since my last Nikon camera, the features have greatly expanded. I love the wider focus options, higher ISOs, double memory cards, and video capability. Yet with all the added features and expanded capabilities, the basic Nikon interface remains the same, lowering the learning curve. Still exploring the onboard editing options. Ironically, I was most excited to discover the ability to shoot b/w! Nikons are rock solid and fit the hand. As close to using an old SLR as you can get, with digital features, all under $1000.

Used, but in great condition! I heard very good things about this camera and I have a lot to learn, but I'm looking forward to learning it on the D7000. The charger I received didn't work, but the seller sent me a new one in a matter of days. I'm satisfied!

I own the nikon d7000 as apart of my nikon dSLR collection. This is far more advanced than the previous D70 & D80 I own. The images are crisper and sharper in appearance. This dSLR captures images at a faster rate than my previous models. The camera itself feels more professional than my other models, I'm glad I spend the extra money and took the step up from the next in line d90 and got the d7000

I bought this to replace my D200 which is way out of date! I am simply in love with it. take it everywhere with along with my backup D3100 :)

I am a professional photographer. This replaced my Nikon D200. I like it very much. Has great ability for low noise non flash pictures. The only drawback is that in auto iso the flash still stays in it unlike the D200. I do not think the flash should stay in auto iso when turned on. Soooooooo what I do is set the camera in for normal weding photography using auto iso but if I go to flash then I use u2 which I set for manual iso. I actually have 3 settings. Normal is auto iso. U1 is for bird photography with focus set for dynamic. U2 is wedding photography without auto iso which I use for the mounted flash. I prefer the way the D200 works for the flash but this gets me by. The camera is superior to the D200 especially in low light. I see the new d7100 to be an upgrade in both focus engine and in megapixels but not much different in low light rendition. I will wait for the next upgrade

It is a wonderful camera a I have every used. Perfect performance and good looking. Easy to learn and use.

From the moment I heard about this camera's release, I was very excited and immediately began the process of justifying its purchase. Once I was able to drop the $1200 all I could find was the kits and I really didn't want the lens that came with it so I waited. And waited. And waited some more. It took almost 3 months for me to find just the body, and I must admit that it was well worth the wait.From the get go, I noticed the mirror slap was much quieter than that of my D200 and I found it to be a pleasing sound. Definitely better for stealthier situations. It was also immediately apparent that the body was smaller than the D200 as well, but not so much so that I could feel a big difference while shooting. Another thing that I noticed was that the larger display was crystal clear and a nice upgrade. The general controls on the body were similar enough to the D200 that it didn't take me too long to figure most of them out, but there were a few options that I had to consult the manual to figure out; specifically, changing the flash mode and trying to figure out where the shutter release cable plugged into. The user menu is similar as well so I had little trouble setting up my normal shooting parameters.I was very pleased to see that the D7000 wasn't nearly the battery hog that the 200 is. I purchased a spare battery and the MBD11 "multi-power" battery pack and got roughly 3,000 frames from the first battery. That's over double what I would get from the D200 and the BP that accompanied it.There are a few other improvements over the D200 that I have noticed as well. The exposure metering seems more accurate and the AF motor is quieter too. I love the 16 MP images (twice that of my previous body) and despite my initial apprehensions, I even like the dual SDHC card slots though I wish I could still use my collection of CF cards. The auto white balance is HUGELY improved over the D200. I would usually do a custom WB for each lighting situation I would encounter. The D7000 has yet to be taken out of Auto WB mode and the results are more than acceptable.The noise at higher ISO settings is greatly reduced in comparison. I get more noise shooting with the D200 @ ISO 1600 than I do with the D7000 with the ISO @ 6400. And the fact that I can go to 6400 makes the camera all the better.Then there's the built in intervalometer which gives the D7000 the ability to automatically shoot one frame per second for up to 999 seconds. This is the feature that I was most excited to use and have used it a few times already. I am a huge fan of time lapse photography and now I have the ability to do TL projects. My only gripe is that the camera's internal software limits us to just 999 frames. That's only 16.25 minutes of shooting when taking one frame per second and when you make your movie (which is normally @ 24 frames per second) that works out to roughly 42 seconds of TL video per session.Speaking of video, that is another feature that I was very excited over and I am looking forward to using when opportunities arise. I have used the camera in video mode all of once in the past six weeks and I am not completely happy with the results. In all fairness though, I am sure that the issues I have with the videos shot are more from operator error than they are from the camera. I really need to read the section of the manual pertaining to the video capabilities before I say anything unflattering.As time goes on and I've had a chance to give the camera even more of a work out, I will make any necessary amendments to this review.Strengths:16 MPISO range from 100 to 6400 (25,600 on the "H settings)6 FPSBuilt in intervalometerGreatly improved auto white balance100% View FinderMetal frameWeather and dust sealsWeaknesses:Limited number of frames can be shot using interval shooting.Similar Products Used:Nikon D100Nikon D200

Company says 150,000 shutter clicks, I have been using it for about 2 years and the think just jammed up on me. I can see a bent shutter on the inside. I've been told it will cost anywhere from $200-300 to get it fixed, sigh.The camera has worked fine, other than a quirk where when it's in Manual mode the camera thinks it's actually one dial movement further down on Apeture mode. I could fixed that by returning to auto mode and taking out the battery. It was just annoying.I was a little surprised by the price coming down so far. Bought it for $1,200 in 2011, now right at 2 years later it's going price is $600. I realize they came out with a "new" D7100 model, I just would have expected the camera to hold it's value a little better. I was thinking it would be different than a computer or other electronic device, guess I was wrong.Camera overall feels great, takes great photos, has plenty of customizable features. I was happy enough to buy a second backup D7000, but now with the low shutter failure I'm beginning to wonder if I shouldn't just sell them both and try a new model.

I've had this thing a few years....... love it. Great camera. Does everything I ever need it to do . Very happy.

Wonderful camera, I only a problem with the battery not hold a charge. It is a little more complicated to set up to my standards because of the menus in menus I have only had it a month and have only used it twice for work. It will be better with use.

I had purchased a D70 a few years back and had accumulated a number of Nikkor Lens over the years. No long ago, I pulled out the D70 and the sensor had gone bad, so I returned to to NIKON up on NY and they wanted over $500 to repair. I knew because the camera had a few years on it, I would be better off purchasing a new camera to replace the 70 instead of repairing it, so I ordered a D5100. I guess I didn't do enough homework before the purchase was made, and found out that all my NIKKOR lens would not function as they were designed on the 5100, I was going to loose the auto focus option on the new 5100 body, so I returned the camera and upgraded to the 7000, yes it was more expensive but if I had to replace all my lens with ones that would function to their maximum potential I would spend much more than the cost difference in the two bodies. I am so happy that I made the change. The D7000 is one awesome camera, it is a bit heavier somewhat larger but much better construction. I will not knock the 5100, which I believe has now been replaced with a new body. As for the difference in the mega pix on the cameras, I don't think I will ever see a difference between the 16 meg on my 7000 vs the 24 meg pix on the 5100. I couldn't be any happier with my 7000.

Like most reviewers state and its true: Nikon took much of the alloy construction and weatherproofing of most expensive full format cameras as well as the best chip technology from FX line and actually put it in a DX camera!!!! This makes for all the great quality and functions of most FX cameras into a cheaper DX cropped camera with the best chips inside to date. Camera is upgradeable thru firmware updates also just by hooking up to computer with included micro to USB cable, fast charger and very long life battery. I have the big MD model Nikon extended battery system on body but rarely do I ever need to draw power from it unless I'm using the high power 900 Nikon Flash or some other battery drawing add-on. This is a SERIOUS camera. The two SD Card slits is awesome on the DX line. I've rented all the most expensive cameras and for all around everyday shooting whether portrait, landscape, seascape, or shooting the northern lights under very dark conditions, the ISO higher settings have little to no noise and it comes with a very thick and in depth guide to get you use to the advanced features fast. Be prepared to buy a weatherproof color coded shortcut guide or use the cameras built in feature to create your own customized menu with just the settings you need to change the most because its menu is huge. Oh, did I mention the gorgeous and highly decorated video photography this camera is capable of with 3D auto focusing and face recognition, etc, etc!!!!

This is a preliminary review. I'm a pro photographer who has been faithfully served by Nikon D200 & D300's for event and nature photography. Just before a trip to the Everglades, my D300's lcd info panel light wouldn't turn off and it kept abnormally seeking the cf card resulting in quick battery drain. Of course the fix was having lots of batteries and turning it off when not shooting. But In panic assuming that the D300 was going to completely fail, I read Ken Rockwell's review and noticed the D7000's price. With time running out and not wanting to shell out $7K for the D3x (or D700 for other reasons) I somehow found one D7000 kit, but not body, offered by Amazon and could get it quickly. It was on b/o everywhere else I looked. I didn't want or need the lens, but what can you do sometimes?I haven't had time to evaluate image quality in detail, but it's impressive at least up to ISO 1600. Without the battery attachment it's small and light, but with good ergonomics. It's got most of the feature required for my shoots and tons of goodies if you're just a camera bug. Combined with the 18-200 VR it's a dynamite, relatively affordable package. It was easy to use without consulting the unusually well written manual. However, if you're used to the D300, etc., you won't be happy with the organization of the controls. The iso button's on the back left and the exposure options are set with a dial like on the D70, so you can't change the most important settings as easily. I don't like the new control for setting the focus options. But if you've never used a D200/D300 you probably won't care. The 6 fps is cool, but I'm used to 8 fps with the D300s battery pack. Those extra 2 fps sometimes mean getting the shot or not for sports/birds.Random remarks: So far, taking movies is easy and fun. Rockwell states that the quality isn't great, but they look excellent when shown on a large led hd tv. I have had no trouble focussing with my 200-400 or any other lens. I don't like it that you can't display both iso and frame count at the same time. The lcd info display on the top of the body seems fine, in contrast to criticisms by other. What I'm really upset about is that neither Nikon or Adobe have updated Camera Raw for phototshop CS4, so you can't use the D7000's NEF files with CS4. Maybe Nikon gets a cut from Adobe for CS4 - CS5 upgrades, which I purchased reluctantly. Nikon's ViewNX2 is good software and loads and displays raw files quickly, but I need to use psd files and, of course, photoshop's + plug-in's features to do real work.At this point, nothing much to contribute until I can get that camera back from my wife. (My D300 healed itself, I did lots of trouble shooting, but don't know why it started to work again.) My recommendation is that if you can afford to shell out about $1.5 - $2K for the body/kit (this price includes battery attachment, sd cards (too easy to lose!), decent case and camera strap [Nikon should get out of the strap business or contract with Tamrac.] buying the D7000's a no-brainer regardless of your expertise and experience.Update, 7/1/11: OK, upgrading to CS5 was worth it, sorry about the conspiracy theory. This is a great camera except that it's destroying my technique because it's so easy to use. With the 18-200 VR and the D7000's low noise at hi ISOs (but keep using Define2.0), I can shed 30 lbs of photo gear and my tripod. It's really fun taking videos and as stated above, the quality's great. And Scott Kelby, notwithstanding, the built-in flash ain't so bad either.

The D7000 is an excellent replacement to earlier Nikon models I have owned. It combines the flexibility of a point and shoot camera with all of the customized features of a quasi professional camera. Having just bought it, I know that it will take many weeks to learn how to use it to its maximum potential. At a subjective level, it feels and handles optimally.