Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D610 Kit

I've never seen a company treat its loyal users worst than Nikon, the D610 is a joke, switched to canon.

Quality of the pictures same as from Nikon D5100 :-(.This camera IS NOT AN UPGRADE!Besides that: Poor costumer service!In one year we will see the D620 with GPS and WLan...DO NOT BUY IT.

Is one of the best camera I ever have. The autofocus is fast, great camera fantastic low light, and daylight pics. You will love it

Not screw over its customers as they have here. Not a very good move Nikon. I'm not getting sucked in again. I'm off to Sony.

Отличная камера по отличной цене, не получит такие же возможности низкой света как имя D750, но это хороший резервного копирования.

I purchased this camera to get into the FX format. My current camera is the D7000 (that I love too). My previous camera was the Nikon D80. Before that I owned various Nikon film cameras, that I no longer use.I sympathize with those that purchased the D600, and I am just as pissed off about Nikon's lack of customer loyalty by not providing a remedy for the D600 fiasco. My recommendation to those that still have the Nikon warranty and their state laws allow it, to claim 'lemon' law for the camera after the 3 sensor cleaning attempts from the Nikon customer service and the re-occurrence of the spot issue after the cleaning has been performed.I tested my D610 for the sensor spots by shooting at F22 as soon as it came out of the box. My camera does NOT have the issue. The sensor appears to be squeaky clean - first out of the box, and then after the many test shots.I was considering the Canon 5D Mark III because of the D600 fiasco. Since I am a long-time (decades) Nikon camera user, I have a collection of lenses and that tipped the scale for me towards the Nkon D610 given the multiple reviews that informed me that this camera does not seem to suffer from the sensor spots issues. I also considered the Sony A7 (and A7R), as well as the Nikon D800. Sony was ruled out for the same reason as the Canon. Although, I was intrigued by the smaller form factor in a full frame package. However, the current lack of body-specific lenses for the A7 was another reason I wound up eliminating the Sony. Since the lenses that fit the body currently were not designed to be physically smaller to match the body size. The D800 was too much camera for my needs and was too slow for my most frequent use cases - sports/action photograhy. I did not want to deal with the size of the files coming from the D800 (I typically shoot RAW to be able to post-process). I also considered getting the D7100. If I did not own the D7000 already, I would probably have settled for that. However great the D7100 features are, that camera is not significantly different from the D7000 for my needs, tipping the scale towards the D610 (since I wanted a full frame camera in the first place).The D610, for me, represents the best value for my purposes. Part of me wishes that I could have the budget to invest into the Canon lens market and purchased the 5D M3 just to keep solidarity with the D600 customers who have been treated very unfairly by Nikon. Unfortunately, at this time I can not. Given the opportunity in the future, I will likely move away from Nikon. For that reason, I took away one star from an otherwise great camera.

I was pretty happy with my DX-format D7100 (in the past I've also had a D7000, D90, D80, D70 and before that a Kodak 14N Nikon-mount full-frame camera) but had also looked forward to going back to full-frame when it became a little more affordable. Finally tried a "refurbished" D600 (before Nikon announced they were AT LAST going to address the problems with that model) but the sensor had dozens of oil spots right out of the box, so I returned it, coughed up the extra $$ and got a D610. I could not be happier, sometimes wondering if this might be the last digital camera upgrade I'll need (well, at least for 2-3 years!) I got it with the 18-35mm lens and am extremely impressed with sharpness/acuity as well as camera handling. There seems to be a "depth" to my images now I didn't see so much with the D7100 (usually with a very good 16-85mm on it.) The dynamic range seems greater than the D7100 had (I can't quote specs on this, just saying I noticed a real-world difference in Lightroom right away.) I cannot imagine why I'd need more resolution (say, a D800) for the work I do, which includes the occasional 24x36-inch print of landscapes, which look fantastic IMHO. At least some of the credit here should perhaps go to the 18-35FX lens, which probably outshines the 16-85DX in equivalent situations.We all know by now that Nikon has been very short-sighted in their handling of the D600 debacle. Nikon Japan and their US service departments are totally out of touch with their customer base in my view, simply awful to their customers, see Thom Hogan articles for more. But this particular camera hits the mark, for me at least. I have been increasingly tempted to go over to Canon like a couple of my buddies have done but will hang in there and hope Nikon sees the light, their recent offer of a fix/replace for the D600 is a small step in the right direction but way too late.

This is an initial review of this kit - be mindful this was after one day (7hrs) of making it a point to go out and take practice shots and to better familiarize myself with Nikon. Bear in mind that others that are coming from a Sony might find this more helpful or anyone who has never used a Nikon.I am coming from 7yrs of using Sony Alpha (700 & 77)and the reason I changed was the noise performance on Sony's is dreadful.Now, I can see the weight being an issue from hand-holding this all day (same I used to do with the Sony). The grip in comparison is smaller so there isnt the same comfort level when walking or moving about. I did this throughout the day but I was more aware of my grip then normal.There are a ton of features/options on this camera so that takes some time to understand them and find the right mix. I was a big fan of the in camera enhancement on the Sony for vividness but have yet to dial that in on the Nikon.At the moment I am not a fan of the selection method for such things as ISO, WB & Metering - the need to perform this with dual buttons is cumbersome and tedious.I can also say from when the moment that you take a picture, it saves to the memory card and is ready for viewing - the Nikon is much slower then the Sony.All in all I am neutral at the moment on this purchase - in the back of my mind I am wondering if the Canon 6D would have been a better choice. Time will tellPS - I did forget to mention that it appears as if I already might have spots on the sensor...I am not as forgiving on products as the cost increase so at the $3K range - not pleased.**UPDATE 4/6/14**Ok, I am uploading two pictures from a series of tests that now unfortunately make my decision to send this product back. Plane and simple - when a consumer makes a purchase in any dollar range let alone the $3K mark I expect a level of quality and even more so on a model that should have had corrections for certain defects.

Let me first say that I own and have used a D600 for 7 months now, and since that product is going away, I haven't had any serious dust/oil issues, and this the exact same camera without those issues, I felt is was fair to review it here. Certainly more fair than the other D600 owners who flamed this new version in other reviews below. To be clear, I don't own the D610 also, but have put the D600 (same exact camera/sensor, but with different shutter) through the paces.I moved up to full-frame after using a Nikon D5100 APS-c camera for a few years. First trip out with it was to Zion NP and the Grand Canyon. The controls are easy to use and certainly a step up for me having more buttons on camera with direct access to ISO, WB, and more. As others have and will mention, the RAW image quality just blows you away. Even after 7 months, when I import files into my MacBook, I still can't believe how good the dynamic range, detail, and colors are. Furthermore, if you really want to play with the images in Aperture/LR, it's amazing how far you can stretch them without degrading the image quality. Lifting shadows or dimming highlights if necessary expands the already great DR. The Sony sensors that Nikon has been using in here and in others really are the best on the market right now. I can't imagine needing anything more than 24 megapixels unless I were a pro making wall-sized prints.Since I wasn't heavily vested in the Nikon system before, and had used and enjoyed Canon cameras in the past, I took several months debating between the D600/610 and the Canon 6D. The Nikon seemed like a clear winner but was still hesitant because of the dust/oil issue (and Canon does have a nice lens offering). Now that the shutter has been replaced in the D610, I really think it's no contest. Unless you're heavily vested in Canon glass, the D610 is the way to go. The 100% viewfinder coverage really seals the deal. After using 95% coverage in my old D5100 (the 6D is 97%), I couldn't stand 'guessing' at what was going to be in the edges of the frame and really didn't want to have to live with that again in a $2k camera.I bought a new 18-35G lens with mine which has been great too. It is unfortunate Nikon has kind of screwed many of the D600 owners by not originally addressing the dust issue, but for what it is the D600/610 is an absolutely phenomenal camera.

A LOT of research lead me to this camera, I chose this over the D800 to get the two user modes. I'm picking up photography after 30 years away, and I wanted a good FX format. The first camera came, and I could not get the viewfinder to come in focus. I thought I just didn't know how to work the viewfinder - and I shot 300 frames before I figured out the diopter didn't work.So, I returned it (AMZN did a good job here, though I had to do the shipping myself). Second camera shows up the next day. First thing I did was unbox it, power it on with a lens, and you guessed right - same problem. It went right back in the box - I didn't shoot a single frame - and I'll return it when AMZN and I work out the how (the first camera hasn't even made it back to them yet).But what prompts my review here, is that the online research indicates this is a very, very common problem, which includes the D800. My measure of "common problem" was finding more than five other instances like mine where I was shipped two consecutive cameras with the same problem. That's either manufacturing problems or it's poorly engineered and gets broken in shipping.You can find out what a working diopter looks like by searching on YouTube for "Nikon D610 Diopter". I should have shot some video of what a broken version looks like, since I've had two of them, but suffice to say that on the first camera - I didn't even know there was a status line at the bottom of the viewfinder with the speed/fstop etc.This WAS the right camera for me - if the viewfinder worked, I'd recommend it with five stars. But it doesn't. The most upsetting thing, is the loss of my time to figure this all out. Without Nikon admitting there is a problem - I'm off the Nikon gear. And it was the perfect Camera for me.

This camera has a lot of reasons to love....1) Small size - cannot see a marked difference in size over the D90 despite the full frame sensor2) Low light performance - incredible low light performance - I have been able to capture portrait images with minimal noise in tough light conditions...much better than my D903) Depth of field - I am getting much better depth of field with this camera compared to the D90 (no slouch) with the same lenses4) Ability to crop due to the larger size images - the size makes it easy to crop and still get decent size images for larger prints5) Speed of focus - this camera focuses very fast and as a result I find myself capturing images quicker than ever before6) Size of viewfinder - Much easier as you can see the entire image and feels larger than my D907) More natural feel to images - I find the images to have more range and see a lot more tones in similar light8) Ability to zoom in "Live View" with a manual focus lens to get sharper focus (makes the manual focus lenses much more valuable)9) Two SD card slots - very convenientConcerns I have:1) The focus points are bunched up. If you want to focus on objects that are not within that central region, you have to use another approach (Hold the AF/AE and then recompose). This has been the case for me a few times....2) The dual dials with locks are a pain to use (not easy to rotate)Still have to figure out a few things -1) Setting up U1 & U2 - get to my settings for most common types of photography quickly2) In-camera HDR - looks very promising3) AF fine-tuningSo far the pictures have turned out very well ...one thing I struggled with is using AF-A. Have had to resort to single-point AF mode to get better focus on my subject (especially with landscapes, it is easy to have your subject out of focus in AF-A mode).I chose this over the D7100 (it is about half the price) because I had a few FX lenses that I really liked and wanted to take advantage of. Can't go wrong with either...I tried the D7100 out and loved it as well.

I really, really, liked this camera and loved the photos. I had the D600, but due to sensor issues, Nikon refunded my money for the D600. When the D610 came out, I waited and it seemed like the sensor problem was resolved, so I bought it. Very happy with it, had the automatic sensor cleaner on at both start up and shut down, and it looked like the pictures were clear. I went on a two week vacation the day after getting the camera, NEVER changed the lens (so doubtful much dust would have gotten in via lens changing), and was pretty happy. Then, I got home where I was able to download my pictures onto my home computer w/ 21" monitor and start doing some conversions to B&W, that's when I saw it - a multitude of sensor spots on the image. Sensor clean and blowing w/ a Giotto blower did no good. So I packed up the camera and returned it. I think that the spots probably would have disappeared w/ a wet cleaning, but here's the catch - Nikon requires that only a certified Nikon facility clean the camera, or warranty is voided. And I just didn't want to get on the carousel of sending my camera to California every time I had sensor spots that could not be removed by regular means. I clean my own Nikon D70s with a swab with no issues, and if Nikon didn't have warnings to consumers about the D610 needing to be returned to Nikon for cleaning to keep the warranty, I'd probably have cleaned it and kept the camera, But better to send it back while I can still get a refund.As for the 28-300 lens - loved it.Shoulder bag - great, and worked wonderfully on my road trip to carry my camera, computer, power cords, etc.

I know the D600 had issues, but the 610 NONE! I love this thing and take it everywhere. The speed it focuses, meters, adapts are great. The only thing I wish it had was dedicated ISO buttons like the D800. While the D600 does have a dual purpose ISO button, I'd rather it be dedicated on the top or side. I love the speed of the shutter, it moves so quick and solid it feels like a machine gun, and it feels like it's built to work. I've had a Nikon D60, D90, and now the D610 and it's my favorite. I've given my D90 to my opposite, and she used to love it but now she's played with my D610 I have to fight her off. I debated quite a while on getting a D7100 and not going full frame, but in the end i'm glad I did. Going full frame has given me so much more in my frames, and the opportunity to utilize my entire lens collection much better. Also going back to DX lens has with this camera is a snap, it automatically switches back and shows a box within the viewfinder on whats in the frame. The only negative thing about this camera is the battery life, this thing eats batteries so be prepared to purchase a replacement battery. The ISO range and quality on this camera is subperb compared to my other models, where before moving above 1000 ISO was amost a no go, with the D610 its no problem the pictures still look amazing.

This will not be a long review, but just enough to get some thoughts out there. First of all, I am not a very experienced photographer, but through the years, I have owned a couple of nice DSLR's, and many point and shoot models. A little over a year ago I purchased a D600. The picture quality was easily the best I have ever seen, and even with my limited skill set, I was getting many pro level photos out of it. My mother in law, who is a very advanced photographer was starting to use some of my shots for her desktop wallpaper, etc. After about 1500 clicks, I started to notice the specks on certain photos. After doing some research, I learned about the oil splatter issue, and returned the camera to Nikon for repair. They kept it for over a month due to a parts delay. Upon receiving the camera back from Nikon, it immediately had the oil issue again. First frame out of the box. I don't even think they did anything to my camera except possibly clean the sensor. I returned the camera once again, and this time the turn around was only about a week and a half. Again, spots on the sensor. So, I sold the camera to a friend of mine who is adept at sensor cleaning, and didn't seem to think it was that big of a deal. Next thing I know, the D610 is announced, and the word is that the shutter oil issue has been addressed. I decided to give Nikon one last try because I already had Nikon FX lenses, and the PQ with the D600 was so outstanding, but promised myself that this would be the last chance they get due to cost. Well, I have had the camera since launch day, and I'm happy to say that it has been superb! So far, so good! Now I can focus on learning more about how to be a better photographer, than spending my time cleaning up my photos in Lightroom. I feel burned by Nikon for sure, but the camera is a winner. The experience was not.

I bought this camera in October 2013. I'm an amateur photographer, I owned a D5000 for 3 years, on which I learned the basics of photography, I also invested in some decent lenses (not the top of the line but good ones e.g. Sigma 17-50 f2.8 (DX), Sigma 150-500 (FX), Nikon 35mm f1.8(DX)). I was interested in exploring new grounds with a full frame body and the D610 was a great choice. It was extremely easy for me to adapt to the new body and know my way to most of the essential buttons on the camera. The image quality, especially at low light with high ISO is stunning, noise is low and I usually get rid of it in lightroom.In my opinion, it is an excellent choice for an entry level FX. I got a 50mm f1.8G Nikon with it and I love it too.The only thing that owners of DSLR such as the D3000/D5000 series is the getting used to the two dials as well as the relatively new button locations such as the ISO, bracketing, AF settings ...etc. Once you get a good handle of those technical issues, you would concentrate more on the shot and produce stunning images.I know that this is is not a technical review of the camera, but I don't think also that this is a good place for full tech reviews more than personal opinions. I use the camera regularly and love it.

I have been a Nikon fan since I could afford to buy my first camera - a Nikon F3HP - an outstanding camera that was bullet-proof. I became an early digital convert and have been waiting patiently for a full-frame digital camera that made sense for me to buy and leverage my base of full frame lenses. i've never liked the DX format when it comes to wide angle shots. The specs of the D600 and D800 are outstanding and both cameras feel great, but I watched in disbelief as Nikon let this D600 shutter issue play out on the Internet. Now it appears to be addressed with the D610 and my experience with the camera has been excellent. My concern now is that a company that manages product issues in such poor fashion with their loyal customer base is probably going to fail in long run. The market is too competitive. Canon and Sony and others have great products. Nikon needs to treat its customers better if is going to survive as a company. The D600 issue was such a basic product/PR issue and Nikon seemed clueless about doing the right thing. I would have bought the 600 or 800 earlier if this issue hadn't played out over the past year, but I am hesitant to invest further in such a poorly managed company. Nikon should be doing something for its d600 owners --- trade-in, credit, rebuild --- and should start by admitting and managing the issue straight up. Product issues happen --- Nikon needs to show that it has the integrity to do the right thing to maintain its brand and customer base. I can assume from Nikon's past history that if there's a problem with the D610, then they will burry their heads and focus on a D620. So, the D610 gets 5 stars for now but the company behind it gets 1 star, averaging out to 3 stars.

First off, I know it's crazy talk but, I think Amazon should only allow customers to review here if they actually own the camera. If you own the D600 and are unhappy with it, please review it there.I'm an amateur at photography and upgraded from the entry level D3100. This was definitely an overkill upgrade but I've always wanted to take professional grade photos. I took the Michael Maven online D600 class which shows all features and settings (highly recommended) and purchased a few FX lenses: 1.4 50mm prime, 28-70mm 2.8 (refurbished), and a 70-300 4.5 VR2. I specifically waited until this camera came out due to all of the reported dust and oil issues from the D600. After about 2000 shots, no dust or oil issues at all.As expected, picture quality is excellent. There is a noticeable difference in contrast from my DX, even in auto mode. The colors just seem to pop. Also as expected, low light shots are brighter and can be shot with lower ISOs. I'm not super impressed with the low light auto white balance but it's possible that it's on par with every other DSLR. I just shoot in RAW so I can modify the white balance and exposure after the fact. The auto white balance was supposedly modified from the D600 so not sure if it's improved or they made it worse!Overall it's a great camera and probably was a smart decision vs. the Canon 6D. Seems like the Canon performs better in low light and has better video. I just wasn't impressed with any photo samples from it.

I just bought the D610 as a backup for my D800 and for macro photography. The D610 is a great camera and the 24.3 mp sensor is much more forgiving than the D800's, especially for hand-held, natural light macro. And; my 65 year neck is very grateful; it's quite a bit lighter than the D800. Coupled with my 60mm micro-nikkor "G" lens, it's turning into a superb "walking around" camera. So far, after about a week, I've found the image quality to be excellent and my images are very sharp with the micro-nikkor. It's also very quiet. I'm used to the D800, which has a really noisy shutter release guaranteed to scare all the wildlife away.I only have two minor "gee, I wish it would do this" comments. The auto-bracket function limits you to only 3 frames, at 0.3, 0.7, 1, 2 or 3 ev; not a deal-beaker, but I like to do HDR and I wish Nikon had designed the camera to do 5, or better yet, 7 frames. The D800 will allow you to auto-bracket up to 9 frames but at no more than 1 ev increments. A little consistency, Nikon, please! Second, there doesn't seem to be a way of programming the multi-selector center button so that pushing it in playback mode immediately brings up the luminance histogram. You can do this with the D800 and I find it very convenient. Still the D610 costs a third less, so again, no deal-breaker.BTW, a bit of advice: If you want more objective reviews on the D610, go visit the product page on the B&H Photo's website, in addition to Amazon's.

As the title says, this camera has "fixed" the problems that plagued the D600. I had purchased the D600 as a pre-order when it first came out. I had sensor oil spots within the first 100 images and I dealt with spending endless amounts of time cleaning up my images in Photoshop. I had over 10,000 actuations on it (with sports photography) and had returned it to Nikon 5 times for sensor cleanings. Actually, on the 4th return they replaced the shutter and the spots still returned. So with my 1 yr. warranty approaching this fall I put my foot down with them and they offered me a full refund, which I took. This was in September. I heard the rumors about the D610 and waited until I could read a few reviews and tests on it. Satisified with what I was seeing on the reviews I went ahead and purchased the D610 in November. While I haven't had time to use it extensively since I received it I DO have about 500 actuations on my D610 and so far so good. NO nasty oil spots. It is such a pleasure to have clean images again. I am very happy so far with the purchase. I just wish the Nikon haters who don't even own it would stop posting all of their negative crap and trying to ruin the camera. This camera is fine and has addressed the issues that the D600 had.

I finally decided to make the jump to FX from my old DX D80. I couldn't quite justify the price tag of the D800 or any of the others, however. Fortunately I have not been disappointed at all with the D610. This camera's ability (paired with a good lens) to reproduce real-life colors is astonishing. In good light, I often feel that many pictures I take need little to no editing, especially in terms of color accuracy to the moment being captured.There are lots of other great perks to this camera as well. The live view is a welcome addition, though admittedly I prefer the view finder. There are lots of neat image processing features, but most, if not all require shooting in JPEG, which I almost never do. I'd rather do most of it in post processing anyway though.If you're not quite comfortable with manual modes yet (hopefully you are when you're considering spending this much on a camera) there are a lot of scene options available.

Have been using DX Nikons since the D70, and was ready to be blown away by the difference in FX with the 610, but quite the opposite was the case. Aside from the added pixels per image and a slightly more spacious viewfinder, I could not find an additional $800-900-worth of value over the D7000 I now own. Amazingly, the 610, together with a 70-300 VR FX zoom, created a seriously vignetted image on a clear, sunny day in one of my test runs, something I never get with a DX body. Internal camera controls may have been able to deal with that flaw, but why should I even have to worry about it? Never had to with film cameras... Anyway, my curiosity with respect to FX has been completely satisfied and I won't have to spend any more in the future to try it again. However, kudos to Amazon for allowing me to return it and even refunding shipping for both directions! Now that's a big deal!

Some have asked if there was any chance Nikon was going to make good for the customers duped into buying the Nikon D600. I took the liberty of posting my question to Nikon and the company's reply. You can be the judge. I suspect I'll have to become a Canon user.Question:Since everyone on the photography planet knows that the D610 was developed to address the nasty and low quality problems of the dust/oil issues of the Nikon D600 will Nikon be offering a trade in program for those of us who had the unfortunate lack of foresight to purchase the D600 in the first place?Granted it would require a Herculean effort to get upper management to admit to the problem and to provide a redress that would show forthright corporate character traits, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to ask. Offering such a program would of course be admitting a flaw but also purchasing untold amounts of goodwill and positive PR for years to come.Answer:Response Via Email (James W.) 10/23/2013 04:02 PMHello Robert Gaskin,Thank you for contacting Nikon Customer Support, I'll be happy to assist you.Nikon has, and will continue to provide quality service to all of our D600 owners. We have never and will not now, however, offer a trade-in program.Don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns, below I have attached a link with contact information:[...]Incident Number: 131022-000623Best Regards,James W.Nikon Technical Support

After having some challenges with my last Nikon (D300), I thought it might have been an isolated issue. I was very excited to order and receive my Nikon D610 thinking the issues with the D600 were resolved. However, out of the box, the viewfinder was completely blurry.....couldn't see a thing. Tried adjusting with the diopter control, looked on Nikon support site, and nothing worked to correct it. After doing some research online, it appears I'm not the only one to have this issue. I was also unhappy with the lens hood included with the 24-85mm lens. It was so loose, it kept rotating around and fell off a few times. I REALLY wanted to like this camera and there are a lot things I like about Nikon, but feel their quality has really suffered in the last few years. With the price of the Canon 6D dropping today, I'm sending this Nikon back and moving to Canon. I have always felt the brands were close, but this has put me over the edge toward Canon.