Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D610 Kit

***Be wary!! Some models come with a broken diopter control! I got one***Compared to the D700:Pros:-Better in low light.-Nice file size.-Video capability.Cons:-D700's performance is a lot better (faster FPS w/MB-D10 and reacts faster)-Not as sturdy. Feels like a D200.-SD Cards and controls need getting used to.*I bought this camera mainly for non-sports usage. I tried it on a couple of soccer games and noticed that on occasional sequence shots, the first frame will be about a third of a stop darker than the following frames. Happened multiple times. Might stick with not shooting fast action sports with it because it doesn't seem to have that problem otherwise.Update - 3/20:-Upset the price dropped $100 after I bought it.-After running over 10k photos through the camera, I still like the file size, but I can't trust the camera to do the job with it's auto-focus on objects that are moving around a lot. You would think that after a seven-plus year difference between it and the D700, the auto focus technology would be a lot better. It's not. It's a step back.-The Auto WB is actually pretty good. Although, the yellowish/green cast of the LCD on the back would tell you different.

Ok enough of the D600 bashing on the D610 review section please.You haters can go ahead and unlike the review if you wish, I understand the way you all may feel ( i would be angry if I was in the same predicament), but this is not the place for it, send down your blood pressure and move on...This review are for those actually interested in knowing how the D610 performs and not the d600.I've had my D610 for over a month now and absolutely love it. I moved up from the d5100 which I really used as a toy, now that my love and knowledge of using dslr has grown it was time for an upgrade of my camera and lenses.I didn't buy mine on Amazon but at B&H since they were offering an extra camera bag, battery and memory included as a package for the same price.Anyways, all I can say is other than the AF which isn't an issue for me (just focus and recompose if necessary) I have no complaints. It really is super fast at 6 frames per sec, no oil specks (have taken about 2000 images with it already and sensor is still clean as a whistle), the location of the buttons to use are very convenient (I've already gotten used to them) and great image quality, (not to mention as expected when using it with my 50mm prime, the images are simply amazing).Other than reviewing all the technical nitty gritty stuff for reviews (which I'm not going to get into) this baby offers all that it claims to provide and I love it!

I had D300 for five years, just bought D610 this month. Image quality appear to be twice better than D300. I'm happy to move to FX. I just wish it has built-in WIFI. Maybe at this point Nikon cares more about image quality than WIFI. The WU-1B device does not connect to PC using a router, only mobile devices. I bought Nikon 1.8 and 2.8 lens. Aperture mode doesn't appear consistent in exposure level from wide opening to smaller apertures. The image taken at wide open appears to be always slightly darker than the rest. It's only slightly but no big deal. It can be fixable by adjusting shutter speed or ISO. I tested aperture mode range using D300 and D7100 and it appears to produce the same results so I would guess it's the general Nikon camera itself. Nikon probably thinks it's no big deal fixing this little problem that no one has complained about or notice. In White Balance, it has incandescent and no tungsten like Canon camera has. It appears slightly yellow, not white enough, but will try to test it some more. I would recommend the camera for excellent image quality but warn it has no built-in WIFI. Not many people are happy with WU-1B.

Not sure why my first review is gone, but here we go with a better one anyway...I been saving up for the D800 forever but this came out and this is better because of the file size that gets stored on your computer. Plus you can get an awesome lens and the body for the price of the D800 body only. Buy from a photography store or best buy because I heard Nikon doesn't take anything bought from Amazon "as I'm told".Who's this camera for? If you love doing weddings, this is it because of low light capabilities and quiet mode.Landscape? Amazing resolution this camera does even with kit lens.Portraits? Depends on your lens, if you use prime, 2.8's, this camera rocks it!Which makes my next point. Are you a real photographer or a hobby photographer?For serious photographers who use the 2.8 lenses for weddings, portraits... This is for you for a great price. For people who just shoot to post photos and don't care, think twice because of the price. You can get a D3300. Or a Canon if you choose them for about $1,000. Have any question I will try my best to answer.

I bought the D600 about a year ago and since then the camera presents the evil dust oil issues. The issue was not resolved after sensor cleaning, actually it got worst making the camera completely useless. The first few pictures I took with the camera (less than 1,800) were amazing but the oil issues ruined the others after. I'm pretty sure that the replacement (D610) have the potential to be a great camera as the D600 but just the fact that Nikon didn't want to acknowledge the issue and provide the right solution is unacceptable. They know that even cleaning the sensor is not the solution. Many D600 customer has been complaining that after multiple sensor cleaning and even "change in sensor" (done at a Nikon Center) the camera recur in the same dust-oil issues. Please my concern is for those that are about to buy the new D610 after my experience with the D600...what are the guarantee that you have as a customer that Nikon will take care of any problem that you can possibly face with a $2,000 camera? Right now many D600 owners (including me) have a camera that not only is useless but because of this issue it can be resell. The right solution will be to replace the D600 for the"new" D610 to those that like me have a $2,000 useless camera in a bag. Please Nikon be responsible and be more customer conscious, if you really know what business is and value your customers.

Always a Nikon fan, I recently switched to Canon for their full frame offering, a 6D. I was so utterly disappointed in it's horrific ergonomics that I couldn't switch back to Nikon fast enough.I've owned a D100, D200, D300 and used a D600 and various other Nikon film SLRs years ago.The best just keeps getting better.The low light ability is amazing. People will look at me funny when I'm shooting and my flash doesn't fire. They will say "your flash didn't go off" and I will just say "yes, I know". Natural lighting is always nicer and this camera is a stunner. Plus, when you want a flash, there is one. Shame on Canon for not including one on the 6D!! Fill flash in backlit situations is always a nice option....... if you have it !!

Let me start off by saying I am not a technical camera expert. I'm a portrait photographer and just a few years in. I've been shooting with a d90 and have wanted a full frame camera. I've been eyeing the 800 for six months. When I saw the 610 was coming out it was less money for the same features I was looking for I got it, but I got so much more than just a full frame camera. I GOT EVEN SHARPER PICTURES! My pictures are tack sharp. Same lens, but my pictures look so much better. Everything that frustrated me before (fuzzy eyes despite doing everything right with focus, shutter speed and light), has now magically been fixed with the 610. Noise is reduced, low light options are better...The 610 has taken my photographs to a whole new level. I thought getting another Nikon would be an easy learn, but I did have to re-learn the in's and out's of this camera, but all in all it only took a few days. Also I was frustrated to find out that my photographs would not load in Lightroom as the camera is so new Lightroom has not come out with version 5.3 to support it. However that is not Nikon's problem. After much research I did find out you can download the 5.3 beta version and that pretty much saved me. I LOVE this camera. I'm so excited I got it. No regrets!

If you're not already heavily invested into the Nikon system do yourself a favor and check out the Canon 6D.I used to own a D600, D610 is the same camera.Canon 6D offers:++ Much better control layout.++ Excellent WIFi integration and App is actually working unlike that D600 WiFi dongle nightmare(you can switch from manual to Av, Tv on the camera without issues and also control aperture, ISO etc. from the App).+ Better grip for larger hands+ Better overall quality (Made in Japan). D600 Made in Thailand.+ Better button feel and operation+ Quieter shutter sound (difficult to explain, simply sounds more solid, not as "clunky/loud" as on D600)o Image quality is outstandingo AF is absolutely OKo frame rate/s is not an issue for meo max flash sync speed is fine for what I need it for (it's not as fast as on the D600)o Single SD card is fine (never used 2 cards before)- lower resolution (not an issue typically. 20Mp is OK)- No flash is a problem sometimes- No time-lapse function integrated in camera (I liked this feature on the D600, however, haven't used it much).In conclusion: I'd no recommend the D610 because you simply don't know how Nikon will handle any possibleissues in the future.I'd rather go with the much larger company and a better made camera. Canon 6D. I did.

I'd owned a D7000 for a few years and it was far and away my best experience thus far with any digital camera. My initial idea was to simply sell my 7000 and change to a 7100. Upon the fast sale of my 7000, I was just about set to buy a 7100 when once again it hit me..do I want to go FX? I'd heard of the issues with the D600, and then realized the D610 had been released, which seemed clearly as a means of fixing the shutter debris issue that many had talked about on the 600.I read many of the new reviews on the 610 and it seemed clear that the issue had been resolved, so I purchased one.I of course checked the sensor right off, it was spotless...after around 1000 shots it remains spotless, actually it's cleaner than my D7000 typically was. I'd cleaned the D7000 sensor a couple times in 3 years.The operation of the D610 is so similar to my 7000 that there's almost zero learning curve. The low light performance is just another notch better than my 7000.All in all I'm extremely happy with it. ..but now I've got to consider some FX glass.

Edit for clarity: I do actually own the D610.Nikon has finally got it right with the D610 - it is truly a fantastic camera, and that's quite a statement coming from a former D600 owner like myself.The D600 was an absolute debacle; after 2 replacements I still had massive dust and oil problems. I strongly disagree with the way Nikon "handled" the D600 problem, but people should know that the D610 is truly a fantastic camera. I was motivated to write this review after I saw numerous people writing poor reviews of the D610 based on their disapproval of Nikon's actions.I don't think it's fair to criticize the D610 based on the shortcomings of its predecessor, so I wanted to take the time to say that all of the problems I had with the D600 seem to have been solved with this camera. My D610 produces absolutely fantastic images and there hasn't been a hint of the dust or oil problems that plagued the D600.For detailed analysis of this camera and its image quality, check out DXOmark.com; they do a much better job of objectively reviewing cameras than I can. But in my opinion the D610 is an excellent camera. I highly recommend it.

This camera is great, captures a lot of detail, a couple of notches above the D7000 that I had.However, I was quite disappointed by Amazon. They initially shipped (as I fortunately discovered later) a used camera. I was a bit suspicious as the camera came with the language, date, and time zone already preset. I later chanced to check the shutter count using Exif data on the image, and found the camera already had 17,400 shutter clicks!! Very disappointing considering the cost of the camera/lens was almost $3,000.Buyer beware.

I am a loyal Nikon user and a semi professional photographer who spent around $15K on Nikon lenses and cameras in the last few years. Let`s start by stating the obvious - D610 is the D600 that actually works. As such, this review is for the product formerly called as D600, which was then "updated" to D610. My experience is that after purchasing this product for ~$2000, i found out that the camera I received was plagued by the well known sensor dust issue - so now I have to spend another $2000 for D610 to eventually get the product I was initially promised. For effectively more than $4000, as in my case, this product deserves a 1 star. If you are lucky enough to be making your purchase today, getting a D610 may be a 5 star purchase for you as the camera is actually pretty good.　The rating also reflects a warning for new purchasers - shame on you Nikon for the unfair treatment of your loyal customers.

I have followed the reports of the D600 issues and I don't like Nikon anymore, in general terms. This "new" body, the D610, if purchased, implies your acceptance that the previous issues are now fixed and your trust of Nikon to do the right thing concerning warrenty work. Sorry, I cannot do that now. In addition to poor quality control at Nikon,there are a few features in the Nikon D610 that I would find hard to accept. As mentioned, the AF points are too close together and seem suited to a DX camera and not an FX camera as this is and FX camera. Also, there is no PC socket in the camera. A PC socket can be handy, especially in emergencies. It is so easy to carry an inexpensive PC cord as a spare to the very expensive TTL cords which can "pull apart" while in use. Do you trust the new camera? Not really because I don't trust Nikon.

nikon gets one star because there's no way of giving it a zero. a camera is only as good as the company that stands behind it. i have had other nikons, and these bums really do not have any respect for their loyal consumers.i bought a couple of cameras that substituted inches for centimeters in the advertising, e.g., promising photo-quality exposures up to 16 x 20 inches when the fact was 16 x 20 centimeters. these were small, compact cameras.my first nikon was the old analog F-5. THAT was a camera, but those days are long gone now. Today, upper management is more concerned with how much of a bonus they'll walk away with instead of returning customers.SHAME on you Nikon. and SHAME on you AMAZON for not taking care of your customers by preventing thieving manufacturers like NIKON from selling their goods on your web site.Time to buy a CANON on another web site.

I believe this is the best value in a full frame dslr.If you do not believe me read dxomark.com,they list this sensor higher than Canon 7000$ dslr sensors.I find the programed u1 and u2 feature to actually make this camera a better choice for every body including people thinking of purchasing a d800 and d4 camera's which are very specialized cameras.If you are a Nikon person(heavily invested in Nikon equipment including dx)the d610 is the better choice for the average photographer.If your moving up from a dx dslr,don't worry all your lens are compatible on the d610.Just make the full frame plunge, the extra light the sensor takes in makes pictures soo much better and easier to compose.If you have the money, I can not think of a reason not to buy the d610.

I have a D70 and a D3100, so this was quite an upgrade for me. I love everything about my new camera. I got the 28-300 kit - Super fast focus and handles low light situations pretty well. It is a little more weight than I am used to, but I paired it with a BlackRapid strap and all is good. I'm not real crazy about the bag that came with the kit but I guess it was an added bonus.I also took some photos with my 50 portrait lens and wow - INCREdible detail - plus the 610 gets the focus right far more consistently than my old D3100 was doing.Overall very pleased so far - Glad I stuck with Nikon.

Been waiting a long time to upgrade from my digital dinosaur, the D100. I was tempted to save money and go for the D7100 and I'm glad I didn't. This camera is perfect for my needs right now.

Love my new D610, quality built, focus speed and the rich details I get, specially shooting in raw, it is my first full frame and I really enjoy it.

Ok so I owned a D600 did not have any issues with that one. I now own the D610 and don't have any issues to report on this one either. For all other people that have exhibit issues with their own D600 Nikon has offered to repair the issue. It's not like they stand by and did nothing. And rather than having the issue continue they released the D610. It's a great camera both are really great cameras. It's a dirty sensor guess what In time they all get dirt dust whatever on the sensor. Clean it and get over it it's not like the camera does t work. Just specks on the sensor. Either way this new edition is well worth the investment worth every penny. For anyone interested in purchasing this camera just do it you won't regret it one bit. Disregard all the rants from non D610 owners. I Did.

Nikon D600I didn't buy my camera from Amazon-got it as a surprise gift from wife who knew I wanted it. The images of this camera are exceptional and to me that's what it's all about. As an enthusiast this camera suffices for my needs and the cost benefit for a full frame is acceptable. Other than the placement of the ISO button which doesn't make it easy to change and keep your eye at the finder at the same time (a minor irritation for me) this full frame is a must to have. I have just been shooting the whole afternoon till evening-no dust or oil particles here. If nikon was correcting the dust/oil issue in this camera (IMO that was the purpose for the release of the D610) they have succeeded. If you hesitated to buy, like I did on the D600 after reports oil and dust, I wouldn't hesitate on the D610.

This camera is the best value in photography. When it comes to post processing your images in photoshop, the 24.3 megapixel size is just right. The 36 megapixels in the Nikon D800 take too long to process. The 16 megapixels are not quite enough when you want to do a tight crop or a large print.This camera has all the feature you will need. For more details see [...]

I have this camera, it's the D610-10. It's no wonder Nikon's profits were below expectations the past couple of years. They're saturating the market with tons of the same cameras, not offering support to retain their customers, and light years away from having as good video quality as Canon, Panasonic, or even Sony.There were so many complaints about the D600 having problems... why discontinue it and rebadge it as a 610? To "solve" the spots issue? This only proves further that Nikon is at fault with the engineering and manufacturing of this camera.Technically my score is 0/5 but Amazon only allows 1/5 at the lowest. Would not recommend to anyone. Please try Canon or Sony (since the Nikon sensors are designed by Sony anyways).

The Nikon D610 is merely the Nikon D600 with an attempt to fix the dust/oil spots which have caused an outrage for the past year. By doing this, they are sticking the middle finger to all the D600 users and further alienating their loyal customer base.I sent my Nikon D600 to be warranty "repaired" in September 2013 and the invoice claims "shutter replaced" but THE DUST SPOTS CONTINUE TO EXIST. Nikon continues to show poor customer service and refuses to admit they released a faulty product.Why doesn't Nikon just recall all the D600s and send their customers a D610, if it is even any good?I encourage ALL D600 users to give the D610 a poor review until Nikon addresses the D600 problem by offering an exchange.

Amazing camera. I have upgraded from a D5100 to the D610. Was easy to learn and customize the menu and buttons to my preferences just using the manual.