Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D5200 Body

Очень понравилась камера своей простотой после D610, но при этом наличии самых необходимых функций и настроек. АвтоISO с ограничением по чувствительности и регулировками выдержек - явно объективный плюс. Понравился...

Все бы ничего , но у аппарата один большой минус: горящие пиксели на матрице в режиме видео, появляются не сразу, но уверенно у многих с течением времени. Причем никон хитро об этом написал в инструкции,типа "могут быть помехи" и теперь проблема с тем что сервис центры "в упор" не видят эту самую проблему и не...

Камере пол года. Задумана вроде неплохо для любительского класса, но есть одно НО!!! В процессе пользования на матрице появились светящиеся и неубираемые пиксели. Сначала волнения не было, камера "белая", 2 года гарантии, какие проблемы? Сдал в сервис и был удивлён ответом: "Фотокамера полностью исправна и соответствует характеристикам данной модели". После этого обратился в Service Support Nikon, больше некуда, но оттуда был получен совсем уж обескураживающий ответ: "ФотокамераNikon D5200, которая имеет возможность записи видео, не является видеокамерой!!!!...

Хорошая зеркалка для начинающих, поможет...

Nikon D5200 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Nikkor с защитным фильтром HOYA PROTECTOR PRO1D 52mm - работет на длинных только выдержках.

До этого был 5100, который я подарил, а себе взял 5200. Работа экспозамера и системы автофокуса очень радуют. Такой медленный и темный объектив как 55-300mm...

Пользуюсь не давно после зеркалки от Никона попроще. Легкий, мобильный даже не смотря на то что мезинцу не за что зацепиться (привыкнуть можно) держать удобно. Кнопки расположены не удобно да еще и утоплены (видимо от случайного нажатия). НО, очень понравились технические характеристики, когда смотришь в глазок и снимаешь, кажется что ты профи с хорошей техникой. Фоты делает четко, резко, правда поубавилось насыщенности чуть чуть. А снимок сохраняет с большим потенциалом так что можно вытянуть как угодно на самой камере или на компе. В общем считаю что это хороший, современный, универсальный фотик за такие деньги. Всем советую, кто ищет что то подобное.

Пользуюсь аппаратом 3 дня, но недостатков обнаружено много:
1) Неудобный хват - причем неудобно всем - и мужчинам с крупными руками и девушкам с миниатюрными (тестировал удобство на вечеринке с друзьями, сравнивали с Сони а100 и Кэнон 40Д).
2) Батарейка быстро садится...

По сравнению со старой D3100, все недочёты для меня исправлены - хорошая автофокусировка, видео записывает лучше, экран стал лучше! ибо старый был убог, что невозможно было определить даже смазы, батарею по-моему стал держать хуже, там где 3100 спокойно держал под 500-700 фоток, этот последнее деление показывает уже на 400-500

Если Вы смотрите раздел Nikon D5200 Body, значит это не первая камера : )) Я думаю что апгрейд при котором вы реально почувствуете разницу это диапазон от Никона D40-60 до D3000-5000. Я бы крайне не советовал делать такую замену обладателям D5100 - разрыв в качестве будет...

Пользуюсь не давно после зеркалки от Никона попроще. Легкий, мобильный даже не смотря на то что мезинцу не за что зацепиться (привыкнуть можно)...

Камера хорошая ,но больше маркетинговый ход Во первых матрица просто ужасно царапается,нет диспплея на верху самое главное,кнопки расположены не удобно ,если что подправить надо отрывать глаз от...

Аппарат получился очень неплохой. Новая матрица радует хорошей цветопередачей и высокими параметрами динамического диапазона...

Матрица очень шумная, фокусировка бесполезная с китовским очень темным объективом, разочарован, развод производителей(((((( Хорош в своем классе!

I imagine most are coming to this camera as either an upgrade to a point and shoot, or as a next step from a lesser Dslr.My needs are a little different, so bear that in mind when you read this. This will be primarily a camera used for a studio setup, as I don't need weather sealing, high FPS, or super fast/accurate AF. That said, here are the things that I note. Both pro and Con.Pros:1. Excellent resolution (and I would be the 5300 is better still in this area) that tops out well above what I have needed in the past (about 16mp)2. Very nice ergonomics and handling. The feel in your hand (I have medium hands) is comfy and just large enough to feel "real".3. Af is better that I experienced with the D5100, or even the D7k (both previous studio bodies for me).4. The menu layout has minor improvements that I find are just notable enough to feel better than its predecessor.5. The colors out of camera seem closer to reality with this than either the 5100, or 7k bodies were. Not as nice as the D700's though.6. Swivel screen is perfect for me, esp. when using it to get low angle shots of kids and pets.Cons:1. The position of the AFL/AEL button (which I use for AF-on), is slightly off to the thumb. Too far out IMO.2. 1/4000th a tad slow.Above average functionality and great files are what make this a very good camera for my current use. For what the market seeks when looking at this sort of camera, it does very well. Even along side the best competitors, it easily holds its own IMO.Is it up for the task? Yes.Are the images it can produce pretty good (allowing for the skill behind the camera, and the lens in front)? - No, its not pretty good, its excellent overall.Will it make toast and tuck you in at night? Well if that was what you hoped for, you were looking in the wrong place anyhow.EDIT: Nikon updated the firmware today, and fixed the only real bug this camera suffers from. Namely the AF-on functionality during certain shooting setups.

This is my first digital SLR. I began using film SLRs back in 1965, but quit photography for a while when the last one broke down in the 1980s. I've been through a variety of small digital cameras starting in 2000, the last being a 4-megapixel Nikon Coolpix 4500 purchased in 2003 (for $529.95).I've taken at least 6,000 photos with the CP 4500 -- mostly macros of insects and spiders, since it can focus down to 0.7 inches, but also lots of bird shots. When the flash quit working on the CP 4500 early in 2013, I decided that it was time for something a bit more advanced. I did a lot of research online and settled on the D5200 with the 18-105mm zoom. We were heading out as far west as Tucson, AZ for our spring vacation, and I wanted more zoom than the usual 18-55mm kit lens for birding.The combination of D5200 and 18-105mm zoom worked out extremely well during our 3-week vacation, and I got hundreds of great shots. I've recently added the 85mm f/3.5 Micro-Nikkor for macro work and Nikon's 55-300mm zoom to get closer to the birds, and will be trying them out during a couple of weeks in Florida just after Christmas.I've been completely satisfied with the D5200 so far, and I like having an SLR with interchangeable lenses again. The flip-and-tilt LCD screen is one thing that influenced my decision. The CP 4500 had a twistable split-body that permitted taking shots of arthropods from lots of odd positions, and I wanted that flexibility, even though the D5200 will be too large to get in everywhere the CP 4500 will fit.Of course, things are a bit pricey nowadays. My first film SLR cost $59 (and didn't have auto-anything -- not even a built-in light meter), which is about 1/17th of what the D5200 cost, but then again I used to buy Levis for $2.95, and cameras have improved a whole lot more than blue jeans have.

Our six year G9 Canon camera had a failure too expensive to fix.So we decided replace it. I considered the new Nikon Coolpix 600. It has no RAW mode and no socket for an external flash, I looked at Canon SX-50. Based on my G9 Canon experience, this is quite complicated to operate. The UI of cameras seems to not make much progress compared to cell phones.Nikon D3200 as an SLR camera,. Because the new model D3300 came out, the D3200's price is suddenly closer to the long zoom point and shoot. The camera is very light and all commands are intuitive. We added a WiFi access via WU-1a Nikon accessory.The Nikon D5200. I has a rotating display, so one can take a "selfie" It has more pre-set shooting programs and a better focusing system. I could not resist the temptation so we got the Nikon 5200 instead of 3200.The clarity and color of the photos is astonishing. Compared to my Canon 7D, this camera weights almost half. We bought it in red, which looks like a modern art piece in a modern art museum..The price of Nikon D5200 compared to what it offers is a steal. Simply out of the box, If you are real beginner, the camera takes pictures in only two setting; automatic, and automatic no flashThen slowly, you can learn more features as the camera smoothly invites you to try from its sheer simplicity that seems to say "you can do it".

About a year ago I went from D70 to D7000 in one gulp. Despite all the "D7000 is a very great move" suggestions online it was a very silly idea because I could barely operate the D7000. I tried a variety of lenses, but nothing could fix my lack of know-how. Eight wonderful D70 years did NOT prepare me for the D7k. The fact that the d7k even HAS an Auto button is a JOKE. I had to shoot manually to get even half decent shots (although I have to say it was great for doing high speed shots of dogs leaping through the air)So a few months ago I craigslisted my D7000 - it pretty much covered a nice new D5200.The D5200 was a good move for me. Even video became a possibility with the d5200 (quite difficult on the D7000 due to the awful fixed screen and the 24fps)The D5200 works nicely with my 50mm prime lens and with my old kit D7000 lens. It even works well with my old D70 kit lens!!However it would seem that the skin color of pictures with the prime + D5200 seems off,bland, and often a little overexposed. But sometimes it's great. I have no idea, really.Anyway to sum up: good snapshots, easy to use all round. LIGHTER than the D7k. Good in low light. But for video? BEWARE! This isn't a camcorder! The autofocus on my lenses in AF-F trying to track kids/dog/baby is awful. It does the best it can but the technology for a rank amateur just isn't there, and won't be anytime soon.If I could just stop the pictures from being a little too bright it would be a perfect camera for me!

I'm not going to get into the stats of this camera. There are many other reviews and websites that already have this information available.The Nikon D5200 is a nice camera. It has a swivel screen which is useful for video or weird camera angles. It has a lot of nice features, one of my favorites being all the auto-focus points and the low noise at high ISOs. The stock lens is perfect for a beginner. You can learn on the kit lens and still have quality pictures. You will want to upgrade eventually though.I think this camera is great for people who want to actually learn photography. If you're just going to shoot in Auto mode all the time, get a nice point and shoot and save yourself a lot of money. If you're actually interested in learning how to manually control your camera, then get a DSLR. The D3000 series (D3300 is most recent at the time I wrote this) is another great series by Nikon with a few less features. Also a great starter DSLR.

I bought this camera primarily for the increase in pixel count over my D7000, but it turns out to be much simpler to operate and much lighter in weight. While the D7000 can accommodate most vintage Nikon Nikkor lenses, the D5200 pretty much has to use the new S VR lenses because it does not have the lens motor drive built-in. The increase in pixel count from 16 to 24 allows a little more cropping of distant shots over the D7000 (the newer D7100 now has 24 megapixels). I also like the swivel view screen over the fixed view screen on the D7000, this makes it easier to view your subject when the camera is held well above or well below your head. The D5200 is a good buy for the money, I got mine "used" on Amazon.

I am a senior citizen and a novice to photography so I enrolled in a Digital Camera class at my local Adult Ed program to learn the basics. Soon I wanted to upgrade from my (excellent but ageing) little Kodak point-and- shoot digital camera. I began my research by visiting the larger electronic retailers to see the varieties and options available and deciding what kind of photos I might like to capture. I like stills of family vacations, landscapes, group shots and stop action photos of grandkids but I NEED easy to operate. I also want low light capability for "No flash" venues like museums. Over a six month span I gravitated to Nikon D series. I asked myself, "What are the minimal camera features I would need to satisfy my intentions?" and "If price is no object which version should I choose?" I discovered the flexible view screen of D5100 would allow me to shoot from a low angle without hurting my arthritic back and knees. The discounted D3200 kit with two lenses was a tempting option for me but the testimonies of other reviewers stated that they liked their Nikon cameras so much that they later bought the next generation as well--not a prudent and economical strategy for me. Also, the lenses offered in the kits were entry level so I would surely later wish I had upgraded to the better Vibration Resistant lenses available. My choice has been to purchase a D5200 black body separately instead of a kit with lenses. Then I selected two lenses more to my liking--Nikon 18-170mm VR to use as my "Do-it-all" lens and a Wide Angle lens for scenery and group photos. No doubt I'll grow to want a portrait lens as well someday. Meanwhile, I have the ideal entry level set up for my needs.