Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D5200 Body

I own a D5100 and 50 mm 1.8 G, absolutely love every picture 5100 takes,the pictures are sharp in focus points.Recently i upgraded to 5200 thinking it will improve low light image capturing and better pictures and more focus points. But I was wrong, 5200 cannot produce sharp image with any lens i own (Kit lens, 50mm and 55-300). The picture is not sharp even at focus points regardless of settings. The images seems like taken from compact cam.Its my fault that I didn't test this camera within 30 days. I think mine is faulty but not sure.With Nikon warranty you have to have pay shipping cost for repair, so I would recommend everyone to test you cam within 30 days or you have go through all frustration and "copy paste" response from Nikon customer care (seriously irritating).1 start for Nikon and when the camera is repaired , i'll test and provide stars.

A letter I wrote to Nikon with some comments on the D5200. I have found three bothersome features on the D52001. When I set the 2 second timer delay, it resets to single shot after every picture. Can Nikon create a firmware update so it stays in 2 second timer until turned off?2. Same condition applies when putting camera in the HDR mode. The camera reverts to normal after every picture taken. Can Nikon create a firmware update so that the camera stays in the HDR mode until manually turned back to normal picture settings.3 I shoot all RAW all the time. I understand because the special effects are processed that they have to be in JPEG. The issue is that when I want to shoot HDR I have to constantly go back to the menu and change to JPEG only. My question is: Can there be a Firmware Update that Can allow HDR be enabled when in RAW mode and then the camera only record JPEG as long as HDR is enabled? In addition can this be applied to all special effects. It is a pain to keep changing from RAW to JPEG every time I want to do a special effect.In the end I am constantly changing the settings of the camera and this takes a lot of time when I am shooting. It would be great to have a firmware update to correct this little flaws.On last item is that I shoot a lot of night shots with this camera. It is really great that the LCD is very bright to see during the day......but at night it is a glaring sun. Again I have to go back to the menu to change the brightness of the LCD. It would be nice if there was an ambient light sensor somewhere to automatically dim the LCD at night and then brighten it up during the day. This may not be a Firmware Fix. Just a note for future models.On the last item I found the menu to turn the "Info" off between pictures as not to blind me when shooting at night.So far so good with image quality and I am having good success with pictures so far.In general I am very happy with the camera. The items that I mentioned above are not deal breakers, just little annoyances.RJ

I am upgrading from the Nikon D40 and I found that the D5300 was very easy to use and it has the no flash feature which works great in lower light scenarios. The stock lens is just right in size and ability to take your everyday shots. I find that the feel of the camera is just right and I don't notice it being to bulky or too small for an SLR (The D40 seemed to be a bit small for my larger hands).The speed and quality of the shots form this camera are outstanding and I am very happy with my purchase!

It is a great camera, lightweight with controls very convenient placed on the camera body. There were two instructions that should be highlighted. I did not read that you had to press the screen button twice to go to the menu selection and spent a while to figure it out. My fault. Also I had set the AP-C instead of the AP-S and the camera would not shoot the picture. After I read the manual I understood the specific condition that AP-C to be used for focusing on moving targets. Again my fault.I really like it where you could cover and protect the screen side. This is because I accidentally damaged and cracked my D90 screen. It is really a fantastic camera with lots and lots of features that I would probably use about 30% of the sophisticated features. I hope to really test it out when I go on a 10 day business trip to China.

D5200 is a really nice camera... Althought it is not a super pro, It is a really nice entry-mid level and if you know how to use it properly, you could achieve awesome results. I have had the D5100 and the D3200, and the D5200 have several improvements against them that I would definetly recommended.If you only take pictures for fun, I would recommend you to get the D3200 the quality is it almost the same. of course d5200 is better is several ways and have more functions... but D3200 it is a great deal for the price.

I have used the heck out of this camera. I love the size, weight and functionality. I've been shooting with Nikons since the days of Nikormats. I really like the way this one feels in my hand when I'm shooting and it's a joy to use. I actually sold the first one of these I purchased and replaced it with the D7100. I didn't enjoy using it so I sold the D7100 and just purchased another D5200. I just got the new smaller 18-55mm lens and it really feels good with that one on. My favorite lens to pair it with is the fast 35mm, especially for portraits indoors with natural light. It's great with the 55-300 for wildlife, concerts and sports.

m1Z7EPVFKTXBBL / mo6GIYVK45SYQ5 Length:: 4:36 MinsThe D5200 has 24MP. 39 AF points 9 are cross type. While the Canon 6D only has 11 AF points and 1 cross type. The 6D is more than 2 times the cost and has 22MP. The Nikon D5200 has a rotating screen, picture control presets, aperture priority, shutter priority, P, and M modes. The D5200 has +/- 5 stops of exposure compensation, the 6D has 3!The D5200 has a great burst rate of 5fps. ISO range from 100-25,600. Exspeed 3 processing power, face recognition, and full time AF with full HD video. What more could you ask for when buying a camera less than $900? I did a complete hands on review video for "Focus Camera" in NYC. I will be posting it to this review sometime later in the week when finished.My thoughts are this camera is light, and while it is not as rugged as a 6D or D600 you get what you pay for. This camera provides great lowlight performance and stunning resolution that is higher than the $3400 5D mark II. Which is worth mentioning. Nikon has leaped ahead of the competition with their new line of cameras.The auto focus on this camera while doing some street and urban photography is very quick and accurate. I had a blast using it as the weight is a very big plus because it can be more easily carried for longer periods of time. If you are in market for a great camera and you are not willing to spend $2k for the D600, there is nothing that will compete with this camera in terms of "Bang for Buck" with either of the brands for under $2k.The only 3 things worth complaining about is you can't change aperture in Live View, however you can't do that in the D600 either. It isn't 100% viewfinder, which would be nice. Also the internal microphone is not that great but does have manual control. These 3 issues are not that big of a deal when considering what this camera does so well for its price range.Great camera, amazing capabilities, worth every penny.Video to Come later this week.Corey BenoitFaymus Mediafaymusmedia.comcorey@faymusmedia.com

This is an awesome camera. It was between this or the canon rebel T5i. It's not cumbersome to operate. In fact my wife is terrible with tech items and she finds it simple to use and loves it. If you have kids in sports/activities the rapid fire option is great. Beware you will take a lot of pics so make sure you have a large SD card and hard drive. We also bought the extra lens for long shots and it was a little expense but worth it.

If you are looking for a middle of the road camera when it comes to budget, This is hands down one of the best options out thereRidiculous quality on photos and videos, I did some research on every different type of camera and the dslr type cant be matched when it comes to delivering quality in this price range(this is my opinion)Only negative with this camera would be the power drainage it suffers when shooting high quality video, as well as the mic, the mic in the camera is cell phone like, this didn't disappoint me because the quality of everything else greatSo I recommend getting an extra battery and an external mic if you want to shoot videosAlso the Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 lens should be one of the first lenses you get, incredible lens, the nikons 35mm and 50mm dont seem to match its sharpness

I already owned Nikon gear but decided to get a smaller, lighter, higher pixel count camera for vacations and now for shooting video. It will work along side my Sony video camera with a similar sensor size. Once you see the big sensor on video there is no going back to the smaller camcorders (1/6 or 1/3" sensors I mean). The camera works great. Good images. But the batteries or not very long lived. Get extra batts if you buy this for heavy video use. The camera shuts down after 30 minutes of video recording and that is really as long as the battery charge is good for. Maybe an other 5 or so minutes. So it works out well 1 Battery per 30 minutes of recording. The battery seams to be fine for still pictures though. I never went through a complete charge in a day for that.

Like others, we finally made the leap to a SLR. This is an intermediate choice, with a sophisticated and robust processor. There is a great review by "Faymous Media" that provides a nice video of the capabilities and specs. It helped tipped scales in favor of this model over the 3000 series, and over comparable Canon models. We are very happy with the photo quality, excellent frames per second, and depth of options.After a month of playing, we are beginning to get an understanding of how to use the vast range of the D5200 capabilities. We are now shopping for other lens varieties for other types of photos, both long distance and ultra-wide. We highly recommend the WU-1a adapter if you have an iPad or iPhone. With that you don't need to bother with buying the remote shutter. It also allows quick views and wireless copying of photos already on the SD card.

I have not used an SLR (Pentax K1000) since i started having problems finding film and developers. I began using my phone to take pictures but they were not exactly what i wanted each time, i kept missing the ability to backlight and change the aperture to increase the focus range. The D5200 has been great, i have been taking much sharper pictures and i continue to play with the manual mode to perfect my shot. What is best now is that i can bracket my pictures without wasting 3 or 4 frames of film. As a new comer to DSLRs i cannot give a great comparison to other cameras on the market, but i can say that this camera did not have a steep learning curve due to the scenes mode and i was impressing people with my first shots. I love the manual, aperture and shutter speed priority and the ability to set the ISO (equivalent) has been great. My only con is that the lenses are much more expensive than i remember from the 90's.

I am kind of disappointed with this camera. My D40X was fabulous....great pics and easy to use. Until my granddaughter drowned it in the Atlantic Ocean this summer. Don't get me wrong.....this is easy to use, has a lot of fun features that my old camera didn't have, but I just don't feel that the quality of photo is there. When I shoot outdoors, they are great, but my indoor pics are really making me crazy. Lighting very different from the D40X, and when I try to shoot scrapbook pages, I can't seem to square them up like I could with the D40X. I will have to work with it, for the price I paid, but I'm not truly happy with it and wish that I wasn't so glued to the Nikon name----should have looked at other brands before buying!

I found this camera by looking up best begginer DSLR cameras. This Nikon was on top so I went with the best. The settings are easy to learn for an extreme newbie like me or anyone starting. The lens (18-55mm) is great as well. Overall great camera I have in fact tried others but this one hit the spot even after the "best" review.

I'm no photography pro but I purchased this after playing around with my best friend's Nikon D5100. 6 months later I'm still in love. This camera is everything I wanted and more. It's true to all the specs given, I've had no issues with it so far. Hoping all my future purchases of Nikon will be just as good!

First time Nikon and dslr user here, and I must say that I'm loving this camera! I'm a huge fan of all the still and video options it gives meaning that even all the preset auto functions deliver outstanding pictures in almost every imaginable scenario. I'm more a fan of manual controls as I'm more familiar with using them on hd camcorders but it's nice to know that if I just want to pop off a few shots without any fuss, I can easily do so.The camera feels rock solid, the screen is nice and bright and all of the controls are easily accessible.My only complaints are that the battery that comes with the camera drains pretty quickly and I really wish the camera had come with an ac adapter (sold separately).I still stand by 5 stars for the quality of stills, video and ease of use all of which are excellent. Time to plan some vacations!

I bought this camera a couple months ago and couldn't be happier! It takes stunning pictures and has outstanding functionality. You can't go wrong buying such a great camera! It's also very reasonably priced! You get a lot of bang for your buck.

I got this camera refurbished, and it works perfectly! I also have use an older Nikon D80. Compared to the d80 (should apply to the new D7000/7100 too), the D5200 feels more "plasticky" and hollow. Performance-wise, the camera is remarkable. It's definitely the one to beat for a while. Both photos and videos look beautiful, and the screen interface is simple and a treat to look at. Raw files can get a little large, though (~36mb), but with a good SD card, this shouldn't be much of a problem.

Ok, for starters we all know this is a crop framed camera. This price for this camera is awsome unlike the d 7000 and new d 7100 which are still cropped frame cameras. This little camera packs a punch when tested against a d 7000. The image quality was better and had far less noise not to mention hdr feature which the 7000 lacked. Now the new d 7100 has 51 auto focus points and 15 cross type points and is about 400 dollars more then the new d 5200. Are you really getting more for your money? Not really the d 7100 is a beefed 7000 with 24.1 mp cmos sensor. Still has 2 card SD slot weather sealed and the whole 9 yards with hdr added. There are some features that are good about this 7100 that you normally only see on full framed cameras but the d 5200 has a few of these features as well. Yes, we would all like a d5200 to be weather sealed but eh can't always get what you want. The end result is the d 5200 is the best camera you can own for under $1000.00 us dollars. The d7100 seems like a bit of a scam seeing how its not much further priced from the the full framed d600 granted the d600 had a bad start with the spotting on images after about 200 shots in, but none the less you can't go wrong with a d 5200 and when its time to upgrade its not too smart to upgrade to another cropped frame camera just doesn't make sense. I would looked into d800 and d800e if you want all the bells and whistles. So if your getting a cropped frame camera like a dx get the 5200 it may not be weather sealed and so on, but the image quality is amazing for its price. Also if your not into professional photography it has an easy to use interface. I originally got this for a back up camera and find my self playing with it more then my d 800. Its a fun little camera and if your new to photography I would look Into getting one of these.

Switched from Canon Rebel DSLR’s to Nikon and glad I made the switch. Being a hobby photographer, I am by no means an expert. Have had the camera now for a week and 90% of test images have been very good and probably had the camera been set properly, most of the remaining shots would also have been good. Aside from reading many comments on vendor sites, I read a lot of so called “professional” reviews and spec comparisons and would hope that others considering the D5200 do the same since this may not be a good fit for everyone so I will keep this short. It was not a deal breaker for me given the other specs, but I do wish Nikon would have added a touch screen. However it didn’t take long to get used to all the settings/menu controls. Build quality in my opinion is slightly better than the entry level Rebels I had, but am a little concerned about comments I have read about dust. I suppose time will tell if this becomes a problem. Video quality was better than I had expected and in my humble opinion pretty much equal to the Canon T4i. The AF has been very quiet and not a problem with videos. AF on stills photos is more than fast enough for me and low light image quality has been very good to ISO 1600. Bokeh with the kit lens has been a mixed bag but with a prime lens (which I have on order) should be better. However, I do have a couple of images where I was really surprised how good the bokeh was with the kit lens. From a non-professional perspective, for the casual photographer or those just getting into the DSLR format, I would highly recommend checking out the D5200. If I could have given it 4.5 stars, I would.

I've tested two D5200's (one from Amazon, another from BH) and they've both been consistently back focusing with the several lenses I have tried. Back focusing (the camera and/or lens focuses slightly farther than where you target) seems to be an epidemic problem among both Canon and Nikon SLR cameras. It is a frequent cause of soft images. This purchase has been very frustrating, because it is an otherwise wonderful camera. A salesman told me that many photographers end up exchanging several times before getting a keeper. This seems like a ridiculous technological disparity--they've got a sensor that can capture an ingrown hair on a gnat's left buttock but the camera won't focus properly. I was told that it's very hard to callibrate a camera to be accurate with all the lenses that are available....but if the problem is back focusing 90% of the time (which seems to be the case with numerous models--I've never heard of a problem with front focusing) why don't these guys start adjusting their products to compensate for that?UPDATEAfter shooting hundreds of test pics and comparing with the D7100 I've concluded that I was getting my drawers in a buch over nothing. The back focusing only seems to be a problem with extreme macro photography; the 1/8 inch inaccuracy does not interfere with sharpness under normal shooting conditions. Although the D7100 is slightly more accurate wide open at very close range, when taking a picture of a person at f/8 from across the room the sharpness is exacatly the same. The resolution really is incredible, and the detail you can extract from the shadows is unlike any DSLR I've ever seen.

I have only had this camera for a short time this winter. So far I am very satisfied with the layout of the controls, the light weight of the camera and quality photo's I have taken so far. As the weather gets better and I use the camera more I might be able to rate it higher.I traded my D3200 for this camera and I believe the D5200 turns on faster and is much easier to focus under some conditions.I would say you can't hardly go wrong with this camera for the price.

This item was bought to be deliver internationally.As I received it, it was damaged. Its not working.Looks perfect, but does not work.How could we do in order to exchange it for one that functions.Please advise to this mail: bert@grupo-gerencial.comThanks in advance.

I'm very satisfied with this product.The delivery service was so god and all intact. Very recomendable!So, if you want to make amazing photos, you should to buy a 50 mm f/1.4 Lens.