Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon Coolpix AW110
406 отзывов пользователей o Nikon Coolpix AW110
Пользовались
Nikon Coolpix AW110?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
diana7dg
07.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Водонепроницаемый! (главное из-за чего брала). Яркий и блестящий (у меня оранжевый, очень важно, если вдруг уронишь в воде)! Совсем маленький по сравнению с моей зеркалкой. Приличное качество фото, очень порадовало, не ожидала! Wi-fi передача фото на iPad и андроид мобилу. Быстрая обработка фото и достаточный набор разных функций.
- - Требует особого ухода после купания в морской воде. Таскала с собой посуду для отмачивания с пресной водой. Открывать только в чистых условиях! И сразу протирать воду, попавшую при открывании (ее немного, по краю крышки и аккумуляторного отсека). Экран в воде очень плохо видно, многие фото сделаны неглядя.
Брала для поездки в Египет и специально для подводной фотоохоты. Фотик оправдал мои ожидания, хотя почитав отзывы про предыдущую модель (100), было страшно опускать его в воду. Он молодец! Выдержал массу погружений и болтание в воде! Батарейка средняя, купила сразу...
Анастасия Анастасия
21.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + ++++++++++супер кадры и видео под водой и днем
- - ночью к сожалению он мало ,что может
аппарат купила в 2012 г . долго выбирала,(панасоник был дороже) и остановилась на Никоне ... ничуть не пожалела, он 2 года служит мне добрую службу, в Тайланде , в Египте в частности ( 16 Гб подводного фото и видео ), сразу заказала 2 аккум,...
Руднев Александр
06.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + OLED-дисплей
Наличие GPS
Весьма интересная функция управление фотоаппаратом через Wi-Fi
Наличие удачных расцветок
Отличное соотношение цена/функциональность (Брал за 9000 в начале этого года)
Высотомер, компас
Степени защиты — погружение на 18 метров
Нормально работает и при -25 - - Слабый аккум (придется взять еще один)
Свой дата кабель (лучше бы был MiniUSB)
Подобрать чехол оказалось не так просто (Фотоаппарат длинноват)
Ненужная функция управления камерой встряхиванием
Малый функционал в программе...
Скроменый эксперт
01.08.2014
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Протек после первого погружения на 1 метр, дисплей умер навсегда - ЗАМЕНА
Скроменый эксперт
05.01.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Хорошее качество фотографий, в руках удобный.
- - Программное обеспечение очень не удобное.
После того как сделал снимок со вспышкой, появляется предпросмотр, и меня раздражает, что он не готовит вспышку во время предпростмотра, а после предпростмотра он ничего не даёт сделать пока вспышка не будет готова. А вдруг надо быстро сделать фотографию, которую можно делать и без...
Скроменый эксперт
08.10.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + компактность, неплохое видио, достаточно удобное управление.
- - ненадежен!!!
высокая цена,
плохое качество снимков при недостатке освещения
по качеству как повезет - рулетка. мой продержался около 1000 снимков
брал его как дополнительный аппарат для сложных погодных условий.
выдержал несколько погружений (до 1 метра), Частично отказал в первый же день отпуска. Перестал работать экран в режиме съемки фото, просмотра и настройки. при съемке видео экран работает нормально. В фирменном сервисном центре отказали в гарантийном...
брал его как дополнительный аппарат для сложных погодных условий.
выдержал несколько погружений (до 1 метра), Частично отказал в первый же день отпуска. Перестал работать экран в режиме съемки фото, просмотра и настройки. при съемке видео экран работает нормально. В фирменном сервисном центре отказали в гарантийном...
Елена Анатольевна
30.08.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Не нужно думать о повреждении водой в обычных условиях.
- - Нет своего чехла, на объектив попадают брызги, зависает.
Снимали 2 недели в поездке в Турцию. В целом впечатление очень хорошее. Снимали и в воде и на суше и днем и вечером.
В воде и с подсветкой и со вспышкой, до 20 м., в темноте - как водится со вспышкой, правда и с ночными режимами тоже можно помудрить.
Есть к чему придраться - при записи видео в максимальном разрешении часто видео дробится, как будто не хватает мощности процессора для обработки потока.
Без видоискателя снимать часто приходится наугад,...
В воде и с подсветкой и со вспышкой, до 20 м., в темноте - как водится со вспышкой, правда и с ночными режимами тоже можно помудрить.
Есть к чему придраться - при записи видео в максимальном разрешении часто видео дробится, как будто не хватает мощности процессора для обработки потока.
Без видоискателя снимать часто приходится наугад,...
Скроменый эксперт
14.10.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Реально водонепроницаемый! Погружался с ним и в бассейне, и в море (после соленой морской воды следует промыть аппарат в пресной, лучше - в кипяченой воде). Брал для путешествий "налегке" и подводной съемки на небольой глубине. Очень радует качество снимков при хорошем освещении и под водой. Видео пишет тоже хорошо, а главное - под водой и со звуком! Есть перечень преднастроек...
Чеха Алекс
05.10.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Достоинства: Можно использовать в легкий дождь.
- - Недостатки: Пропускает воду... При заявленных 18 метрах глубины вода в аккумулятором отсеке появляется, если помыть его в умывальнике. В итоге, заматываю щели изолентой перед погружением в воду... Так воду пропускает меньше. Короче — мрак! В дополнение всего частенько зависает, приходится вынимать аккумулятор. Отсутствует...
Скроменый эксперт
30.05.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Компактный, высокое качество снимков над водой, ручная настройка баланса белого под водой!
- - Не работает на глубине выше 20 метров
Купил этот аппарат для египетского сафари и не пожалел, качество снимков под водой меня полностью устроили, но обязательно надо измерять баланс белого каждые 5 метров глубины, позже выложу лучшие фото. К сожалению я не поверил, что его нельзя опускать более чем на 20 метров и на глубине 35 метров в него проникло несколько капель воды и он в итоге вышел из строя!
Хотя на 35 метрах он продолжал писать видео. Вывод: не более 20 метров, для камеры без бокса это пока предел!!!
Как и обещал лучшие фотки:
http://yadi.sk/d/CiZGiFsZ5KYLb
http://yadi.sk/d/aecTe29s5KYQp
http://yadi.sk/d/p9zXvTta5KY_j
http://yadi.sk/d/MrZRQud75KYa1
http://yadi.sk/d/n8K7ZpP05KYav
Хотя на 35 метрах он продолжал писать видео. Вывод: не более 20 метров, для камеры без бокса это пока предел!!!
Как и обещал лучшие фотки:
http://yadi.sk/d/CiZGiFsZ5KYLb
http://yadi.sk/d/aecTe29s5KYQp
http://yadi.sk/d/p9zXvTta5KY_j
http://yadi.sk/d/MrZRQud75KYa1
http://yadi.sk/d/n8K7ZpP05KYav
Скроменый эксперт
23.10.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- - ненадежный
Покупали для снимков на суше и на небольшой глубине под водой в отпуске.
- выдержал только одно погружение на глубину не более 0,5 м. После второго в отсек с аккумулятором попала морская вода и, как следствие, перестал работать экран. До этого механических повреждений не получал.
- слабый процессор,как следствие частое проседания fps в видоискателе и долгая подготовка к следующему снимку.
не советую
- выдержал только одно погружение на глубину не более 0,5 м. После второго в отсек с аккумулятором попала морская вода и, как следствие, перестал работать экран. До этого механических повреждений не получал.
- слабый процессор,как следствие частое проседания fps в видоискателе и долгая подготовка к следующему снимку.
не советую
Антуфьев Борис
12.11.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Легкий, удобный.
- - Нет ремня на руку
Брал для подводных съемок в Египте. В целом камерой доволен. Аккумулятора вполне хватает на 1 день. Снимал в основном видео. Ничего не зависало и не тормозило. Камерой доволен. Погружался не более чем на 10 метров...
valentin sukharev
19.08.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + водонепроницаемость и ударопрочность (еще не испытывал), gps, wifi.
- - ужасно снимает при недостатке освещения (в помещении). в автоматическом режиме логика включения вспышки непонятна.
хотели компактный фотоаппарат, устойчивый к внешним воздействиям. пока испытали только на улице и в помещении. уличные фотки получились отлично. а вот в помещении на автоматических настройках - уже что-то непонятное...
ИВАН ПОПОВ
22.08.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Аппарат достаточно удобен в управлении и оно интуитивно понятно.
Снимки "на солнышке" получаются хорошие и даже очень.
Ударопрочен и водонепроницаем.
Порадовали и точность экспозамера и цветопередача.
Фото-видео под водой не хуже , чем сделанные камерами в боксах.
Тут нужен опыт и неторопливость для фокусировки и кадрирования. - - Похоже , рекламное завышение пикселов и слабость...
Конева Катерина
08.11.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- - ненадежный
Покупали для снимков на суше и на небольшой глубине под водой в отпуске.
- выдержал только одно погружение на глубину не более 0,5 м. После второго в отсек с аккумулятором попала морская вода и, как следствие, перестал...
- выдержал только одно погружение на глубину не более 0,5 м. После второго в отсек с аккумулятором попала морская вода и, как следствие, перестал...
Бобров Александр
02.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Все супер, качество снимков и сам аппарат. Выбирал из всех возможных данного класса. Сопрягается с Айпадом по Вай фай , т.е можно управлять фотоаппаратом дистанционно, делать снимки и перебрасывать снимки на планшет! Те кто пишет притормаживает после каждого снимка - поставьте карту памяти с индексом 10 и все.. Показывает на карте места съемок. Куча...
Колесников Артем
06.07.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Хороший, легкий, красивый, функциональный,
- - Скудная, да что там, откровенно бедная комплектация. Слабая фирменная батарея, не внятный ремешок на шею! Хотя при таких весе и размере лучше ремешок на руку!
Качество снимков за 9 750 руб. (именно столько отдал за него...
Сенина Вера
15.08.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + не успела узнать
- - Сломался при первом погружении в воду на глубину 20 см. Перед этим все сделала по инструкции. Сейчас прочитала отзывы про AW100...
xes66
16.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + мега фотоаппарат за эту цену. есть все.
- - подтормаживает после каждого снимка.
порадовало
1 высотомер, компас
2 карта с достопримечательностями.
3 gps
4 подводная сьемка
5 довольно...
1 высотомер, компас
2 карта с достопримечательностями.
3 gps
4 подводная сьемка
5 довольно...
Скроменый эксперт
30.10.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this camera as I wanted a more durable point and shoot that could handle cold temps for Skiing and underwater for Scuba diving. I specifically bought this camera over other ones due to the 59' depth rating, which is about 20' better than all of the competition. Overall, I was impressed by the specs, and I bought it.Initially, I was also excited to use Wi-Fi, figuring that I could just make it an Access Point, connect to it via SMB/CIFs and then pull images off. Alternatively, uploading from the camera to a SMB/CIFs/FTP/Dropbox anything would've been nice. It turns out the Wi-Fi features of this camera are basically unusable. I can control the shutter from an app and see pictures remotely, but there's no way to get images off the camera via Wi-Fi which seems like the low-hanging fruit feature that makes Wi-Fi in a camera worthwhile. Anyways, not a deal breaker, but just a disappointment.The camera seemed to take good pictures. Not great, but considering the size, lens, etc. the pictures aren't bad and met expectations. However, I found that while on vacation, the camera would regularly freeze. The LCD screen would show live video of what you were looking at, but none of the buttons would work including Power On/Off. The only way to rectify the freeze was to remove the battery (NOTE: this is not something you can do underwater). The freezing seemed to happen more often when taking multiple photos in short time. The camera would start to get a bit warm and then freeze after nearly every photo. If you let it cool down, it would work well for a bit then start freezing again. Fortunately, when I went diving, it never froze despite heavy use. I hypothesize that underwater keeps the camera cooler and prevents the overheating/freezing condition. It's worth noting that while it was warm outside when I used it, it wasn't that hot. Max temps of 85F/30C.While diving, the camera worked well until about 30' deep (less than 10M). At that point, you could start to see the LCD screen convex and would see bubbles form in between the glass as the pressure was making contact from the outer glass to that actual LCD panel. At around 35', I started to get random errors from the camera such as, "Cannot support this SD Card" and other unusual behavior that made taking pictures impossible. Once coming back to 30' or less, it would immediately start working again. I did dive to about 50' with the camera, and it didn't break, but I left it off at those points since it wouldn't work anyways.All that said, I believe the 59' water depth is basically probably how deep you could dive with it "OFF". Perhaps going lower than 59' could cause actual permanent structural damage. In my experience, this camera did go down to 50' and survive the dive, but it does not actually function properly much past 30' deep. I took it on three dives and this condition was repeatable all the time. The screen bending at 30-35' really makes you hesitant to dive any deeper.I bought this camera at a local warehouse store with a pretty liberal return policy. I will likely return it this weekend as it clearly doesn't live up to the expectations and with the freezing feature, it is hands-down the least reliable camera I've ever owned.Other final gripe: There is no way to charge the battery via a cable. You must remove the battery and use the external charger. This is inconvenient when traveling as you have to bring the charger which is fairly sizable and has a long cord, etc. I preferred my past cameras that used Micro-USB to charge; with those I can just charge it right off of my computer's USB port and not have to bring more chargers and international adapters. I understand it's waterproof, but there are already two other ports (HDMI, etc) under the battery cover. It would've been thoughtful to allow cable charging from under the waterproof port.I gave it 2 stars rather than 1 because it did take good pictures and video and the battery life exceeded my expectations. However, Nikon's overzealous marketing departments should be ashamed. Any device intended for diving should function to the designed depth and even more. That's diving-101.
Скроменый эксперт
05.01.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I have been an avid compact digital camera user for about 11 years... I started with Nikon Coolpix in May 2002 and then had 4 Canons before I bought this Nikon in December 2013. I wanted a waterproof camera that had extra features, because, let's face it, Canons tend to lack on the cool features category. This camera let me down a LOT. In many of my comparisons, I am comparing to my Canon Powershot 310 HS ELPH. I took side-by-side comparison pictures in many of the scenarios that I compare to in my review.Camera body- It is a bit bulkier than my canons, which I expected because of the waterproof capabilities. It was comfortable in my hand.The blue color was gorgeous, and the buttons were squishy like everyone said, but I didn't mind it at all. The one thing that is annoying is the location of the lens. It makes it VERY easy to block with your finger, but I'd prefer the lens there as opposed to the flash because at least you can see when you've blocked the lens (My Canon has the flash in that spot and when it gets blocked you don't know until after you've snapped a bad picture). The locking system to keep it waterproof was mostly effective, but after 3 beach days, it somehow got sand in there, and this is THICK white sand from Grand Cayman... I have no idea how it got in there, and I'm lucky it didn't ruin the waterproof capabilities. Shutter button is easy to press (and press halfway to focus first)Menus- The menu screens were very basic, and they looked EXACTLY the same as my first Nikon 11 years ago... It's time for an update. Though the menu screens were easy to navigate, they were very slow. Also, it was confusing to get to the different GPS options, and some options I probably never used because I just couldn't find them.General camera use- This was pretty easy.... I found myself using the scene buttons frequently to get the best shot as compared to my Canon which I just use the P setting for, but Nikon lacks some of the options that canon has which made me upset. They have no color options like "Vivid" that I use with sunsets with my Canon. The underwater scene was perfect for underwater shots while snorkeling. I took shots without that scene and then with, and it was clear that the scene mode made a huge difference. One thing that was a HUGE let-down was how long it took for the flash to load between shots. I know that typically, Canon cameras have slower shot-to-shot times, and this Nikon was WORSE. I was very surprised because I didn't read any other reviews that mentioned this.Picture quality- nothing to brag about, nothing to complain about. The pictures were fine, but many were very grainy compared to my Canon. This was especially true when you zoomed in, though the Nikon is supposed to have higher pixel count than the Canon. It beat my Canon out in exposure compensation for close up portraits, (something canons tend to not do well with) but everything else, the Canon (that is 2 years old) was FAR superior with. Landscape shots, group pictures, etc... The canon was much better than this Nikon. Darn.Video Quality- HORRIBLE!!! I could not believe this, but it was horrendous. The video was choppy, got grainy at points, and then, to top it all off, the SOUND DID NOT MATCH UP!!! That reason alone was enough for me to return it. Really, really, bad.The one thing I liked about this Nikon over my Canon is the ability to do panorama by just sweeping the camera across.... I have NO idea why Canon has not adapted this technology yet. However, even on this Nikon, the technology was NOT perfect. You had to hold it PERFECTLY straight across or it would fail...Overall, I will be returning this camera. Definitely NOT worth the two-hundred I paid for it. I think it would be worth it to pay 300 and splurge on a DSLR. I'm disappointed, Nikon, and because of this camera, I will probably go back to Canon (or try out another new brand).
Скроменый эксперт
25.04.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I bought this at Best Buy because I returned two Canon D20s to Amazon. Both specimens of the D20 had miserable audio on video playback. Yes, right out of the box. Because of this I decided to go to Best Buy where I could actually listen to some playback. Also so I could try the image stabilization effectiveness.Here is some background. I have been using a waterproof Pentax Optio W20 for the last several years. I visit Hawaii and snorkel extensively and make lots of family movies/dvds. (See link below for my 3 minute turtle video.) The Optio has a couple of issues: it makes a loud noise if you zoom while videoing, and the image stabilization is not highly effective. (I have an old man's Benign Familial Tremor.) On the plus side the Pentax has served for 5 or so years and...most importantly....it does NOT leak.In general I am not inclined to be needing special effects and am not fussy about image quality. I am willing to accept on faith that Nikon will meet muster on the image quality count. Besides, I have another almost-DSLR I use on land most of the time.I went with this Nikon after trying it at Best Buy. (Yes, I know I "ate" the sales tax.) I will probably keep it but there are some noticeable caveats I will mention. The camera meets my needs for IS; it zooms during video capture--which not all do--and the zoom is noiseless in my first trial.First, you need to understand the wifi is, in my terms, "crippled". I had hoped (presumed) the camera would be as smart as my Smartphone and be able to "share" pictures directly from the camera via my email or other account. Not so. Instead, all the camera does is set up an ad hoc (computer to computer) network. You connect your "device" to the camera via the ad hoc network, upload the picture to the device, reconnect your device to your wifi network, and proceed to "share" as you choose...from your device. (The upload is accomlished via a free Nikon app you load on your device.)In my case, I do most of my emailing from my computer--a Mac Air. I may as well remove the sd card from the camera and put in into the card slot on my computer. (I hate cables, and Nikon is not my friend in this regard. Their camera cable appears to be proprietary; or at least it is NOT a micro or a mini USB.)You can also control the camera using the on-device app. Why would you want to do this? Sorry to display my lack of inventiveness.Note: In Nikon's wifi design a computer such as my Mac Air is not a device...it has to be an ipad, a smart phone, or an android tablet. The wifi would make sense if your home base is such a device. Many devices--esp. iPads-- do not accept SD cards so the wifi would be a way to get an image transferred from the camera to the device.Note also: Movie files cannot be transferred using the wifi app. The Nikon website advertises that they can be so transferred but the Nikon app says they cannot. You probably would not want to transfer movies via wifi anyway due to the file sizes involved.Another annoyance with this camera is the menu/submenu displays. Under some of the menus there are more sub-items than can fit on the screen, so scrolling is necessary. Fair enough. But there are no up/down indicator arrows to tell you if there are more submenu items, and whether they are available by scrolling up or scrolling down.In time I may come to find utility in the GPS capability but for now I am thinking I will leave it off. I always know where I am when I take a picture and I am not into geo-caching.Given that GPS will take more battery power, you may be interested in the batteries I just got from Amazon. link: Pack Of 2 EN-EL12 Batteries for Nikon Coolpix AW100 AW110 S31 S800C S6100 S6200 S6300 S8100 S8200 S9050 S9100 S9200 S9300 S9400 S9500 P300 P310 P330 S$12.99 for the two.They are rated at 1700 mah. The Nikon battery is rated at 1050 mah.Minor item: the charger comes with a 6' cord. Travelling pain. The Canon charger plugged directly into the wall with folding prongs. Much more compact. I am thinking about cutting some length out of my cord.I have not tried the Nikon underwater. I do like the door closure mechanism. It seems very positive and because to lock it you are turning a wheel--essentially a gear....I am believing there is more mechanical advantage to make the seal.Turtle video[...]
Скроменый эксперт
11.05.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Agonised over buying this for days after reading the mixed reviews - am travelling in Thailand and was in Bangkok heading south so wanted an underwater/rugged camera - was sucked in by the 18m waterproof and thought 'surely it can't be that bad and if I really take care of it I won't have the problems others mention'...2 weeks of owning it and treating it like a new born the following have been observed1) Someone described the screen as a scratch magnet - could not put it better myself - lady in the shop put a 'free' screen protector on - horrified when made it back to hotel and took it out and immediately noticed TWO scratches that look to have gone through the protector! I bought a case especially after purchasing and put it straight in there - How the **** did that happen?!! Right now the screen is scuffed pretty much all over and I don't know how it is happening so easily! I treat my iPhone (using now to write this) far worse and the screen still looks good as new - I've also just noticed the writing on the front is all rubbing off! Sure I don't really care about the looks but surely this should not be happening on a 'rugged' camera?2) I like to mess around with white balance - not impressed with the AWB and equally not impressed with the manual set white balance (which is kinda laborious to go and set each time too) much prefer my old canon IXUS3) I also like to mess about with long shutter times and kicked myself for forgetting to check if this camera can do it - it can't as far as I can work out... :( the longest is 4 seconds using the 'fireworks' scene mode... (Which means you also cannot use manual white balance in a scene mode...)4) Pictures - they're OK and I am most definitely no pro photographer but my old Canon IXUS that this has replaced seems to take far superior looking photo's5) The action button (the button you use to take the photo!) is hard to press and try to keep the camera still at the same time in my opinion6) The BIGGEST one and the reason that has prompted me to add this review is that the lens has just misted up!!! It's hardly been in the water! I tested it on day one in a sink full of water (break it in gently...) and no apparent problems - meticulously dried it and noticed there are holes around the lens area that were holding water in there so really let it dry out properly - since then it's been in the shallows in the sea twice (literally just took it in with me when paddling about in the surf at the shore) - taken back to hotel room and dried meticulously each time before opening battery cover... I am on the beach now and was just taking some shots then about to head in for a swim/snorkel and noticed the lens misted up...I am majorly ****** at myself and feel like kicking my own butt from here back to Bangkok to return it but I bought it knowing full well 'no returns' and that the warranty (Thailand only...) only covers 'faults' not water related damage...!How Nikon can sell this I don't know... Perhaps they will admit a design/build fault and some kind of recall?I will have a stab at trying to get my money back one way or another and attempt to contact Nikon directly (this is NOT a cheap camera!) but I think I have about as little chance of that happening as this camera surviving any more water related activities...Why people are giving it 5 stars and saying they have not even tried it in the water is beyond me - surely there are a billion and one cameras on the market that take just as good photos for a quarter of the price that work 'out of the water' - the uniqueness of the AW 110 is that it is supposed to be ruggedised no...? I mean that is what you're paying the money for right...?Really really really wish I had never bought it and that is so disappointing :(
Скроменый эксперт
13.05.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I like to keep a point-and-shoot on my person, and I'm tough on cameras. My third compact Canon (and second Elph) in the last decade finally bit the dust last month after I dumped it in a saltwater creek. Nikon's new, tough AW110 seemed like a good next choice for the clutzy, outdoorsy type.Canons are durable enough; that was by no means the first time I dropped that Elph--just the last time :-/ But the waterproofness, shockproofness and WiFi in the AW110 roped me in. Still, I'm a Canon fan, so that's where I'm coming from as I review this Nikon. I've also only had the Nikon for 2 weeks, so I might update this review later.In summary, the Nikon AW110 isn't as slick as comparable Canons; it's slower, with fewer options. But its ruggedness gives me confidence in packing it to head out on the water or into the wilderness. And despite its drawbacks, the photos that the AW110 are producing are what earn it 4 stars. More details:CONS- Too easy to pick up lens flare on sunny days.- Manual is EXTREMELY incomplete, and I'm having trouble finding camera forums or tutorials online to fill in the blanks.- Lens is at the top left on the camera, and for some reason, my finger wants to go there, so photos occasionally have fingertips in them.- Contrast is too strong in high-sun situations. Switching shooting mode can help, but it seems silly and time consuming to continually adjust shooting modes. I've defaulted at leaving it in "easy auto mode," letting the camera choose, with mixed results.- Very few self-timer options (no custom option).- Slow turnover time after a photo is taken (a full few seconds more than Canon) and "continuous" photo option (find this in shooting mode --> scene mode --> sports) is slower and much more limited as well. I'll be experimenting with smaller photo-file sizes to see if that speeds it up.- Too many steps to shift over to macro mode.- The little lens gets dust and dirt on it that makes a big difference in photos if not caught. I haven't found the best cleaning methods in the manual. The glass over the lens seems tough, which is good because, again, I'm hard on cameras and have already been resorting to using a dry edge of a towel to wipe water and dirt off the glass.- Charger is huge. Really, Nikon?EHHH - MIDDLEGROUND- Altimeter is a cool idea, but I can't figure out how to calibrate it using GPS, and you're supposed to set it "every time" you use it (that's about all the manual tells you regarding this feature), or its accuracy isn't to be trusted. That's clunky.- Photos almost always need lots of editing (the Canons could rock out photos that didn't need as much help), but edited versions turn out generally more amazing and dramatic than what the Canons produced. - WiFi only links to mobile devices with a (free) Nikon app downloaded. Even on my old Android, this worked well, but I'm still disappointed it doesn't connect to a laptop.PROS- Edited photos are stunning: sharp with good color.- Underwater seems to work nicely.- Macro takes too to switch to, but the camera takes great pictures in this mode.- Feels durable; I have confidence in its toughness.- Nice size and weight; good pocket fit.- I know it's cheesy, but I like how the strap works (Canon Elph just came with a wristlet that attaches to a hole in one side of the camera. The AW110 has a long neck strap that attaches to both sides and is easy to tether to things like bikini straps).- Compass works well.- Fast setup: controls look like Canon and are easy to learn. Charge the battery, load it up with an SD card (not included), and shoot!
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 406.
