Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot G1 X
155 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot G1 X
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot G1 X?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
b.arkk
21.05.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + фотоаппарат "песьня"
- - не хватает какого нибудь экстримального режима для матрицы мегапикселей так на 25 , что бы еще больше увеличить детализацию и оптического увеличения до 6-7 раз
я любитель, не пользуюсь фотошопами и RAW, только то, что сразу получается при фотографировании, был Canon G9, упал-сломался, стал искать замену, к основным требованиям : компактность,...
Скроменый эксперт
13.08.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Качество сьемки без зума, сборка
- - Немного великоваты габариты, потеря светосилы при зуме, ужасная крышка (выкинул и установил глубокую...
Скроменый эксперт
14.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + За 17350 р. для себя я лучше фотоаппарата не нашел для отпуска. Ручной зум для меня был минус. Купил запасной аккумулятор, автоматическую крышку, и надо еще купить ремень (тот который в комплекте натер...
Аркадий
24.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Порадовал стабилизатор, фотографирует всё четко даже без штатива. Очень удобный поворотный дисплей. Единственный минус, отсутствует возможность менять оптику, только макро кольца.
Пахомов Сергей
07.06.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Чисто рекламные На сайте производителя всё просто супер
- - Это не фотоаппарат...
1. НЕТ не только макросъёмки, но и просто снимать с расстояния менее 1 (!) метра не получится (фотоаппарат не может сфокусироваться). Задача вполне по зубам дешёвой карманной мыльнице.
Попросил в фотомагазине сфотографировать этим фотоаппаратом витрину с расстояния вытянутой руки, и ни чего не вышло. После тоже самое попробовал сам менеджер магазина - с аналогичным успехом. За это на меня продавцы почему-то обиделись.
!!! При покупке тест на съёмку с малых расстояний обязателен.
2. Цена порой больше чем у очень достойных ПОЛНОЦЕННЫХ зеркалок среднего класса
В Нижнем Новгороде...
Благодарова Елена
23.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Возможность высококачественной подводной съемки. Фото и видео хорошего качества.
Железный корпус.Почти все, что есть - плюсы. - - Видоискатель.
Отсутствие макро.
Медленный автофокус.
не понравился подводный бокс САNON.
Разногласия в сопроводительных бумагах по подбору аксессуаров-то карта до 16 мб, то любой емкости.
Поразило качество снимков в полутемном коридоре - вышло супер!...
Markin Alexander
03.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Легкий, компактный, металлический корпус, качество снимков, разрешение. В руке приятный вес - понимаешь, что это не мыльница из прастмассы. Возможность использования бленды фильтров, внешней вспышки. Диапазон ISO большой, выдержек.
- - Если бы компания КЭНОН не заявила, что у него есть макро, то и не было бы огорчений. Но при умении использовать ручные настройки, можно и козявку, капельку, цветочек...
Селиванов Сергей
09.06.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Качество изготовления, приятно лежит в руке, качество снимков, быстрое включение (около одной секуды), быстрая фокусировка, наличие RAW 14-bit, ОВИ (для прицела), башмак для внешней вспышки и другие удобства (долго перечислять)
- - Цена, вес (несущественно), крышка объектива (несущественно).
Этот фотоаппарат можно носить с собой почти постоянно. Качество снимков...
Скроменый эксперт
03.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + металлический корпус
дизайн
светлая оптика
малошумная матрица и качественные снимки на уровне любительских зеркалок с китовой оптикой
raw
возможность использования проф. пыхи! - - нельзя менять объективы)))
отличный фотоаппарат, не зеркалка, не беззеркалка, но качество снимков и удобство...
Nadion Kurt
26.07.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Только компактность.
- - Цена и всё остальное
Подарили, потому и пользуюсь. Однако основной фотоаппарат это...
Скроменый эксперт
22.03.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + МАТРИЦА!+
Отдельная кнопка записи видео 1920 x 1080 @ 24 fps (Full HD) , ISO 12800
+преимущества всей серии G типа: оптический стабилизатор, горячий башмак, байонет для адаптеров, оптический видеоискатель - - Крышка на объектив, крепление для штатива возле аккумуляторного отсека, слабый аккумулятор NB-10L (на 13% меньший, чем в G12, плюс большее электропотребление на монитор)
Замена DSLR Rebel/600D в меньшей упаковке и меньшей цене.
Реальная альтернатива.
Реальная альтернатива.
Becker Alina
26.03.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Компактный ( это вам не зеркалки!) умещается в небольшую женскую сумку.Хорошее качество снимков. Удобная вспышечка.
- - Неудобно расположена кнопка ВИДЕО - в правом левом углу(в том месте, где пальцы правой руки держат фотоаппарат). Ну раз 7 за три дня случайно нажимала ( при съемке фото)...
Скроменый эксперт
21.05.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I just want to preface by saying that I'm no professional and do not plan to be. Photography is a HOBBY to me and that's that. And my purchase of this camera reflects several different things including: price, what I'd use it for and features.First, I want to mention a few things I've noticed about reviews on this camera: slow auto focus, great photo quality and poor macro. I wanted to address those main things from my point of view.SLOW AUTO FOCUS - This is actually TRUE and is not just simply one or few people's opinions. For a camera in this 'class' and with the technology stand-point we are at with digital photography, it almost seems arbitrary that Canon let this un-detatchable lens be so slow. I've had my hands on a few compact cameras and all of them had super fast auto focusing -- which honestly should be a given for a such a small camera, right? Well....here's the thing though, this camera is NOT THAT SMALL. I know, so many things about this camera seems gimmicky at first, I thought these same things. Why is this camera so HEAVY for a compact?? Compared to many of its competitors, this camera feels like a tank! But I'll get into the build more later. But I agree, that the auto focus is a bit undesirable. Now if you're focusing in manual quite often (as I do) then this shoudln't be a problem anyway. But for $550, you can't really justify such a slow, very crucial function.(I should also mention, I did not order this camera off of Amazon. I actually bought it in store, in person so I knew what I was getting into...)PHOTO QUALITY - As I mentioned, I've played around with my fair share of compacts and in comparison, this camera, in my opinion, has beaten them all in terms of image quality (this is comparing to the Nikon P7800, Lumix LX5, and Olympus XZ-1). I get stunningly sharp jpegs straight out of the camera. Now, this is purely an opinion and again, please note that I am NOT a professional and do not really care for pixel-peeping nor am I anal about specs and IQ. Just know the optics on the lens are high quality and deliver great photos for those who, like myself, are enthusiasts of photography but aren't trying to make a living off it.Most importantly, I shoot mostly in JPEG but am well aware of the difference of RAW quality. I'm just saying, if JPEGS are this good, you can get some serious shots in RAW.POOR MACRO - Okay, wide open this little baby does shoot f/2.8 which seems decent but really isn't very wide in retrospect (my old LUMIX LX5 had an f/2.0 lens and my Olympus XZ-1 with it's fabulous f/1.8 lens and that thing was faaaaast so I knew this wasn't going to be as "BOKELICIOUS" as I wanted it to be...) So if you are even remotely familiar with how wide your lens needs to be in order to achieve shallow depth of field for macro photography, you should already know that 2.8 isn't anything to brag about. But in case you're getting lost in what I'm trying to say......what I'm trying to say is -- I KNEW I WASNT GOING TO GET AMAZING MACRO SHOTS. I had no intention of getting this camera for amazing macro photography to begin with so maybe I'm not so disappointed by it, but YES, the macro isn't that great. However, I like being discreet when I'm shooting. I like using longer fixed length lenses with wider apertures to take close up shots, as opposed to getting all up in that flower's face. It's just not my style of shooting...but to each their own.Now in terms of build and exterior, this thing is...uhhh...how do I describe it....it's like...driving a FIAT. Yes, a FIAT. It's a wonderfully made little European car that is meant to be luxurious but looks kinda weird on the outside. But if you stare at it for a while, it kinda looks...charming? I guess. Yeah, that's a terrible analogy but I can't really think of any. How do I put this.......compared to all the cameras I mentioned before that I've owned/used I think this camera is probably the ugliest looking straight out of the box. The P7800 is not any prettier in my opinion....but has a nice pancake like lens attached to the body so it looks prettier in pictures. But in person, good lord I cannot stand the way the P7800 feels. It's just so gritty and harsh. I don't know...all of this is just personal preference. The G1X has a mostly aluminum body and the black is rich black and matte. It FEELS incredible in my hands and personally, I'm okay with it being a little ugly as long as it feels nice. (Again, "ugly" being subjective here...)The only negative thing I can say about the body is the weight. This thing isn't fat, it's just too buff. It's solid and feels expensive for one. I've never owned one but I'd say it's probably comparable to the weight of a Fuji X100. This thing is not for dainty fingers. I know it's kinda weird because it's supposed to be compact and light. My LX5 and XZ-1 were super incredibly light, however, they did not boast the features that this camera has nor the image quality in my opinion.Two words: ELECTRONIC VIEW FINDER and
Скроменый эксперт
31.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Remember the Kodak Pocket Instamatic 20 camera? That was my first camera. Or the wondrous Polaroid SX70! I loved that camera. When digital came around, with the infinite pre and post processing available along with being able to take multiple test pictures without the cost of film...there was no choice but to change over.Over time this reviewer has had many portable cameras, most of them Canons, including a Canon Pro90, PowerShot A650, PowerShot G6 and G10, and now a G1X. Additionally, this reviewer also has a first gen 5D and a 50D. Each of these cameras had or has its advantages at the time it was purchased.When the G1X was introduced early in 2012, it cost $800. While praised for image quality (especially in unassisted low light) and innovative sensor tech in a smaller package, comments like "designed by engineers but not for consumers" alongside "Canon has created its own market segment" distorted an already crowded market. Many reviewers rightly balked at the price vs value range. The G1X, even at $750, is in some company making the choices among 4/3, smaller and larger DLSR's, and today the Sony RX100 II, much more difficult.The G1X has image quality and Canon's operating system on its side. It also has high quality construction that comes with some heft and size, not really "pocketable" but certainly portable; which some users will find reassuring along with providing a bit more hand hold.Thinking about other options included the now acclaimed, Sony RX100-2 with 20 MP, a deceptively small form containing lots of features, and with excellent low light capabilities. For this photographer, the Sony was just too small, without a fully articulated view screen, and without a good way to use filters (sticky attachable adapters do not work for this user). That choice would have been much harder if the price for the G1X was still the original price of $750 (the current price of the Sony RX100-2), but at $600 for the G1X, the price was right. Another option, the new (and more expensive) Canon Rebel SL1, which is really not all that compact, especially with more than a pancake lens. Or the G15 or G16, both great with the right size and feel, but without articulating screens, and really--just not quite the low light capability that this photographer needs.Being able to take higher quality pictures indoors (conventions, festivals, etc) with a discreet camera, no flash, and the necessary ISO was an objective in the current choice of a G1X. The G10, while capable, was irritating in the significant increase of grain when jumping over ISO 400, to capture stills of slowly moving people in crowds. And for those reviewers who think the G1X shoots slow, it is a vast improvement over the G10 in a continuous shot mode. The other things that draw attention are being able to take HDR exposures and macro capabilities (more on macro further down).This reviewer decided at the time to continue with a G10 and wait. TODAY--the G1X costs $600 here on Amazon. The wait was over, the cost vs value ratio is well within the mark, even with the Sony RX100 II drawing attention.For those familiar with the Canon menu and operating system, the G10 and G1X are nearly identical. Canon's menu system translates well across their entire line, is intuitive for most users, and makes some complaints about "no actual included paper manual" a bit dated. (This user has the downloaded PDF manual on a virtual drive for viewing if necessary on a phone, tablet, or computer). Personal familiarity with how the Canon works in the process of taking a picture, pushed this photographer away from other choices that certainly presented some intriguing options. The G1X is strictly button oriented for navigation (no touch screen). A minor complaint for this user was the dual use of the back dial which sometimes would be pressed during turning, moving to a different parameter than the one being adjusted. A lighter hand helped.Across the spectrum of shoot modes there were no surprises. Additional scene modes, while interesting, and perhaps even used by the average consumer, will probably be used sparingly with all the possibilities of post processing available on the software side. While there is an HDR picture mode (takes the shots and processed them), the multiple exposure route with post processing software is the one this user prefers for more flexibility. Another reviewer indicated that these multiple exposure modes should take all three pictures with one press of the button. That is a great idea, and one I wish I had on my Canon 50D.Macro is a mixed bag. This reviewer joins the complaints about auto focus distances, inability to properly focus at times, the continuous yellow "not focused" warning telling you to back up a little more. Macro shots are possible, and it is possible to take good macros if you spend time with the composition. Fast "catch the bee on the flower" shots are more difficult. Forcing the G1X into macro mode helps.
Скроменый эксперт
06.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Ah, the much-maligned Canon PowerShot G1 X!If you're already a PowerShot G series user and understand this line of cameras, you probably suspect the issues that you read about are moot points. And for most photographers, you would be right. It is a point-and-shoot compact with ample manual control and RAW capability. It takes stunning photographs with a minimum of fuss. It's what I've been wishing for since the birth of digital photography. Excellent image quality in a portable, all-in-one package. What's not to like?For years I've used PowerShot G series cameras as SLR backups because they had RAW capability, plenty of manual control, and portability. They were not without their limitations, though. And those limitations were frustrating. Namely, those associated with a small sensor--high ISO noise, noise reduction smearing and narrow dynamic range. This camera more than addresses those issues. Dynamic range is improved. High ISO image noise is well controlled without noticeable loss of detail. I don't find its performance significantly slower than my G12. It DOES work in low light--and the pictures are beautiful. Clean and usable through ISO 3200 (and, hey, 6400 is actually pretty decent). Image quality in some ways is better than my EOS 60D. And the resolution is great enough to allow some cropping without noticeable loss of quality.Others have already said it, but it bears repeating. (And repeating.) It's unfair to compare this camera with compact system (mirrorless and four-thirds) cameras, DSLRs or any other camera for that matter because it stands alone in its class. It isn't a CSC, and it isn't a DSLR. It's a solidly built, all-in-one point-and-shoot compact with a big sensor and a fixed lens that zooms. In short, a maverick camera. Granted, it's not for everyone, but for photographers who use care composing their images or just like always having a camera handy--one that takes truly excellent pictures--this is it. Enough cannot be said about the quality of images through ISO 3200. Or the gorgeous, high-resolution vari-angle LCD. Or its creative capabilities.I can put the G1 X in my purse or hang it around my neck and carry it without discomfort. And no fiddling with an array of lenses and gadgets. Because the lens retracts a good way into the body when the camera is powered off, it is fairly compact to carry. Compact for what it is--a large sensor camera with with a 28-112mm zoom lens, a built-in flash, an external flash hot shoe, optical viewfinder and a high-resolution, 3" vari-angle LCD. It will fit in a coat pocket, no problem. (But you WOULD look and feel kinda funny with it in a pants pocket.)I added a CowboyStudio ALC-G1 X Camera Auto Lens Cap Cover, so removing and replacing the lens cap is not necessary, and it works very well.If you're already familiar with Canon's G cameras, there's only a small learning curve. More like a blip than a curve. Mostly it's remembering to use macro mode for close subjects. This swiftly becomes an automatic motion. That's about it. In some ways the controls are simpler to use than the G12's. For my style of shooting, minimum focus distance is its only drawback, and with the Canon 250D 58mm Close-up Lens, this camera takes incredibly good macro pictures with beautiful bokeh.For someone who's not familiar with the G series, there's some ground to cover for manual controls, but the good news is that the camera has several very useful scene modes where the camera makes the decisions for you, and JPEGS straight from the camera are colorful, sharp and accurately exposed. It is equally suited to the hands of novice and seasoned shooter alike.In Review mode, there's a slight lag when you press the button before you can see the image--the G12 is faster in that regard. In shooting mode, shot-to-shot time is slower by a fraction of a second. Shutter lag--yes, a little, but not that noticeable if you're accustomed to the performance of this camera series through the G12 model. (Can't say anything about the G15 because I've never used one.) Autofocus is actually quite fast, but it takes the camera a little time to register. Go ahead and snap the shutter. You can trust it. It has already locked focus before the camera tells you so--and it's pretty darned accurate.Although I don't often use video mode, when I do, I like the ability to zoom in and out while recording, something new to the G series. And I appreciate true HD video. The file format doesn't eat up huge chunks of computer memory, either, and videos are more easily shared than with previous G model cameras.Battery life is short. Really short. If you take a lot of pictures or videos in a day, it's a good idea to have at least a couple of spares charged and on hand.And the camera is too expensive. Period. A lot of cameras are. I understand that cost of production makes it so, but it is still too expensive. I couldn't afford one at its price point until I found a good deal on a "used, like new" copy.I keep it in a cl
Скроменый эксперт
01.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
[Note: This review was originally intended as a comment to the early review of Yang Wang: "Very Good Camera with Flaws", listed as the most helpful G1X review at the time of this writing. As my thoughts expanded, I realized that the text exceeded plausible comment lengths, and might be better suited as a separate review].I concur with most of Wang's review and recommend careful reading of it to anyone for a summary of excellent features found in the G1X. However, I find the designation "flaws" to describe features that require adjustment and extra care on the part of the photographer harsh and exaggerated. The word "flaws" might be mistaken for truth, which would be unfortunate as it might cause doubt in the minds of potential buyers in the sense of: "Better wait for the next model." I am not affiliated with Canon and not in the loop of advance announcements of new cameras, but if you're on the fence with the notion that the G1X is somehow flawed, I recommend you think again and start looking at this camera with fresh eyes and consideration of the admirable way technical trade-offs to accommodate a large image sensor are incorporated in this ergonomically well-designed, small camera. Canon has set the bar very high with the G1X, towards a new class of cameras beyond the traditional G-series and similar high-end compacts from other brands, based on the superb image quality that comes from a large image sensor. Strange thing is: you wouldn't know it from many of the reviews listed on the Amazon site. In that sense, for those contemplating purchasing the G1X, I recommend you do your homework well and read through the clutter of personal opinions guised as reviews on the Amazon site for the G1X, some of which are particularly harsh in their assessment.Why does the G1X elicit such unhelpful reviews? In part, I think, this comes from the hefty price tag ($799) Canon put on the G1X when it was originally introduced. Fortunately, the price come down significantly since then, but it is still well above prices of other high-end competitors. Paradoxically, some of the most negative reviews come from the customer base specifically targeted by the G1X (advanced photographers who wish to add a smaller, portable camera to their DSLR arsenal without significantly compromising on image quality, Hogan's Compact Camera Challenge, see Yang Wang review). Indeed, for those used to DSLR handling, I could see that the G1X might appear slow. This might be true for Canon G-series users as well. I have tested the G15 in the store, and it does appear snappier than the G1X. The added ability to focus down to 1 cm from the lens surface in macro setting on the G15 (not possible with the G1X) could easily make the G15 seem more advanced. But remember, that picture on the G15 (close up or faraway) is captured by a sensor merely 1/6th the size of the G1X sensor (and the G15 sensor is large compared to earlier point-and-shoots and more recent cameras with extremely large zoom ranges). In the end, the large sensor size wins out in most, if not all, circumstances when it comes to image quality, something many DSLR owners attest to and consider an apriori fact in their product reviews of compact cameras. So, if close-ups are your primary interest, the G15 and a series of other great cameras (and they are truly marvels of modern camera technology) is available for you, as well as DSLRs equipped with a macro lens. If your interest is in creative high-resolution photography without the weight burden of a DSLR with added lenses, the G1X deserves your utmost attention.There are fortunately balanced reviews of the G1X as well. Of reviews listed on the Amazon site you need to select carefully and carefully evaluate their content. Helpful comments have recently been added to some reviews (in the comment section) by R. Schwarz (Thanks!)--it's worth searching them out to help make up your mind. For those able to read German, I also recommend the review by Bazi on Amazon.de. A rare 5 star appraisal from this well-informed and critical reviewer. Read between the lines and you will come away with a balanced and very positive impression of the G1X.There is no need in this review to list all of the G1X's features--you can find them in the usual places, including YouTube. I make an exception for the focusing "issue", which is not an issue at all, but is a topic that has elicited many negative reviews/comments which are easily misunderstood. Wang describes the situation fairly well, but even his/her review draws a line at indoor snapshots.I have owned the G1X for just a short time now, but even in this brief period I have had great results using this camera indoors for photographing my three-year old daughter who literally never sits still. It takes practice and planning to get the right shot, with extensive use of pre-focus by pressing the shutter button halfway and using a small AF window. I have gained experience with this kind of photography using the Canon
Скроменый эксперт
09.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I once read a comment on a photography blog that most consumers who purchase a DSLR with a couple of kit lenses, stick with one (usually a fixed 35mm or a 15-80mm, or something similar, zoom). It becomes a hassle to carry more lenses, and sometimes the camera gathers dust.I consider myself an amateur photographer, probably not at level of what people call "pro-sumer". I understand the basics of how to create a good photograph, but I just don't take enough photos every day to get to the level of some of the beautiful photos I see there, unless I'm very lucky. So this review is based on being a fairly experienced amateur.I had a nice DSLR with three good lenses, but I was using the smaller zoom lens almost exclusively. I decided that if I was going to take a lot of photos and really get better, I needed a camera that was powerful but a lot smaller. Something I could throw in my messenger bag and take more photos. And I just got annoyed carrying everything I needed to take a decent photo.So, I sold my DSLR, and started the process of which would meet my needs. I wanted it to take outstanding photos, to be well made (of course), and give me a lot of overhead in powerful features that as I improved, I wouldn't be thinking, "maybe I should have gotten another DSLR."I rejected the super zoom cameras, because even though they're great for capturing images far away, they suffer from a tiny imaging sensor, which means that they're not all that great in low light situations. And since I don't do much nature photography where I'm trying to take a photo of some animal 1000 yards away, it really met none of my needs.It came down to the Canon G1 X and the Sony RX-1. Of course, the latter is over $2000, and if I'm going that high, I might consider one of full frame DSLR's or similar. What impressed me about the G1 X were reviews here and elsewhere that seem to indicate professional photographers were carrying it as a backup camera, or one that they carry when they don't need their full kit of lenses and bodies. And although the price is much higher than super zooms and almost any point and shoot camera, I knew I was getting a lot more.All that being said, here's what you should expect from the camera:1. It has one of the largest image sensors available in any camera. It's just slightly smaller than what you would find in a typical DSLR, but larger than you would get with a 4/3 camera and several times larger than what you would get in a $200 point and shoot. This means two things: you get outstanding low light photos, and high ISO performance without a lot of noise and artifacts.2. Build quality is at the level of higher priced Canons. The body is solid metal, instead of plastic. It has nice rubber grips. You don't even find this in lower priced DSLR's.3. User interface, though complex, is intuitive for those who have experience with higher quality digital cameras.4. Compact dimensions, though not as small as one of the generic point and shoots.What I found problematic:1. Big sensors on small cameras give some physics issues, including depth of field. If you love those simple cameras that give you an almost infinite depth of field, this one won't do it. This really isn't a negative, but just a warning if you're looking for a point and shoot camera that is literally that.2. The manual is in a pdf file on a CD. I hate this because sometimes you need to look up something, and either I print out the manual, or open up my iPad to read the manual. By that time, I give up.3. Even though the interface is intuitive, it does take some practice to get the settings right for a particular shot, especially since there is no handy manual. I would suggest one of the guide books when you purchase this camera like David Busch's Canon PowerShot G1 X Guide to Digital Photography. It actually walks you through proper settings to get good photographs.4. I don't like the optical viewfinder. It's basically useless (there's no information or anything there), and when the lens is extended, you can see it in the viewfinder.5. The lens isn't threaded (even though it kind of looks like it does), so you have to purchase an adapter for high quality filters.My conclusion. This isn't your every day point and shoot camera, it is much more advanced. It has a learning curve (which I have found to be a bit lower since obtaining the guide book). If you're looking for a point and shoot, and just think a camera at this price must make it the best one out there, then you are right and wrong. It is in the top two "point and shoots", but to get amazing photos, you really have to learn how to use it. Also, you have to understand how to use a compact camera like this with a huge imaging sensor.I'm deducting a star for my issues with the camera, but I believe it is superior to many lower priced DSLR's and 4/3 cameras. And at its current cost point, it is a great value.
Скроменый эксперт
03.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought the G1-X in late October to replace a G12 that I was only semi-satisfied with -- given my particular needs.I probably have one of the most unique needs for this camera compared to most who seriously consider it. The overwhelming majority of my use is for posting photos of social group events at the meetup dot com social networking site. As such, high ISO capability and ability to use a camera without flash are extremely important factors for me. One COULD make a case that any high end compact would likely be good enough for this specific purpose, which is one reason it took me so long to commit to purchasing this camera. I was waiting forever for the XZ-2 to be reviewed...much less come out (which apparently will happen tomorrow, Dec. 5) and was not sure the usual suspects (G15, P7700, LX7, or RX100) would serve my needs. In late October, I purchased the camera for $599 in person at Adorama in NYC, which was too tempting to ignore and would also complement the 320EX Speedlight that I already had in my possession from the G12.In addition to social events, I do take limited pictures of landscapes at social events outdoors, as well as some family and extended family-oriented gatherings. As such, this camera has served me fairly well so far over a couple hundred shots -- much more so than three other cameras that I have used in recent years (Canon A590, Nikon D3000, Canon G12). When rating the camera, I would've been inclined to rate this between three-and-a-half and four stars (3.75), but gave the rounded-off score of four stars because image quality IS the number one issue for me. Please note the pros and cons below as it relates to how I use this camera (mainly for group and portrait shots):----------POSITIVES:1) Most importantly, image quality and resolution are fantastic, as most people online have attested to -- even in the negative reviews.2) As far as I am concerned, if I was buying right now and seeing the December Holiday prices at Adorama flirt with record lows between $549-$599 (I bought it for the latter price in October) puts this camera in a different category/segment with strong reconsideration than if I was considering this camera in April 2012.3) ISO for my purposes seems usable up to 8000 in somewhat low light if I want to do heavy Topaz DeNoise reduction later.4) Shots are usable without flash unless severely dim environment.5) Image stabilization seems really good. Too bad I usually have to normally skewer higher (1/30-1/100) because I have to worry about subject motion and not camera motion.6) Auto white balance seems very accurate most of the time. However, not sure how much more improvement I would be seeing more often if I shot some Smart Auto shots to activate the DIGIC 5 "Multi Area White Balance" option.7) Have always thoroughly appreciated Canon's user interface and menu structures.8) Color accuracy and saturation when processing RAW in Digital Photo Professional looks more natural than other cameras, even if that means less "pop" -- scowling at YOU, RX-100. This is using the "faithful" picture style in the application and relatively light sharpening (unsharp mask at +3 strength with +2 or +3 fineness). However, I need to use JPEG more for a more complete opinion concerning this overall issue.9) More or less has the chock full of external controls and buttons that the G12 had.10) Pop up flash seems to have almost eliminated the red eye that I got with the poorly placed flash on the G12. This is for those few times I use the pop up flash, of course. Big plus is that G1-X is much more - physically - appropriate for the 320EX than the G12 ever was.11) When occasionally inspecting and/or cleaning lens, I am not getting the (removable) scratches I was getting with the G12. Although this was likely the shutter-to-lens (physical) distance issue that received much attention, I do wonder if the lens itself is inherently more durable against light cleaning with wet lens tissue.12) 14 MP allows for additional cropping freedom compared to small-sensor as well as small MP cameras. Important given that I am often restrained from using my feet to reduce distance between subject(s) and camera at social events/gatherings. Another advantage of the big sensor, high MP camera for me -- despite my not using the camera (almost at all) for prints.-----------------------------NEITHER POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE:1) 28-112 zoom good enough, though teleconverter and digital zoom usable for even more distance. Only P7700 long zoom range, G15 zoom range and RX100 Clear Image Zoom kept me reconsidering this issue over and over.2) Although somewhat bulky and slightly heavy (especially to bring to social functions), that downside is offset by the fact that I like to use the camera ergonomically and very much appreciate the articulated screen. Generally speaking, has SOMEWHAT successfully (thus, neither positive nor negative) married my ideal of a fixed lens package containing big sensor and high q
Скроменый эксперт
20.06.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I really thought the Canon G-1X would be that perfect take everywhere Digital Camera. It has that G series Solid Build quality, a fully articulating High Resolution LCD, optical viewfinder, HotShoe, Raw shooting, Lots of very accessible manual controls, DSLR sized sensor with built in 4x zoom lens and all in a compact sized package. I have a Canon G11 which takes terrific photographs at lower ISO settings. The G11 is limited however at higher ISO settings because of its small sensor. The G1X has a much larger sensor so I really was expecting G11 quality photographs even at higher ISO settings.Having such high expectations, I was ultimately disappointed. That is not to say it is a bad camera because it is not. It just does too many things not well when compared to other cameras in this price range; an entry level DSLR or Compact System Camera and even the G11.First, the Really good: The build quality, the controls, camera design, very sharp & 4x lens captures every detail even at higher ISO settings (much better than many kit lenses); perfect match for the 270EX speedlight, great color reproduction/auto white balance in artificial (indoor) lighting, almost every setting can be manually adjusted and customized, Excellent High ISO shooting, Very Sharp, bright and fully articulating LCD, usable optical viewfinder, compact sized and reasonably lightweightNext, the Not so Good: Anything taken closer than a foot away (all macro shooting) is just a blur, photos taken in natural lighting (sunshine) look drab and washed out when compared to any decent Compact system or DSLR camera or even a good point and shoot like Canon's other G series offerings (even after performing every in-camera adjustment available); Automatic White Balance and Evaluative metering for natural lighting (sunshine) is not reliable; AutoFocus and shooting performance more like a point & shoot camera rather than a camera in this price range.In sun lit conditions (low ISO settings), the photographs rendered by the G11 (and presumably the G12 & G15) are much more vibrant and clearly better overall with much better dynamic range and shadow detail. Under artificial lighting and using an external bounce flash, both the G11 and G1X rendered similar (and very good) photographs up to ISO 400. After ISO 400 (indoors), the photographs rendered by the G1X were markedly superior to the G11 and comparable to an entry level DSLR or compact system camera. Macro shooting was not even close, the G11 (and almost every other camera I have ever used) was much, much better than the G1X.This camera has a target audience; someone who shoots primarily at higher ISO settings that is looking for a very portable, solidly built camera with an optical viewfinder, great LCD with manual and RAW shooting capabilities that does not care about macro capabilities. However if you do most of your picture taking outdoors, I can not see any reason to purchase this camera.If purchasing this camera, I definitely recommend choosing a vendor with liberal return privileges (ie Amazon). I can definitely see some people falling in love with this camera and yet others requesting an RMA within a short time. I also definitely recommend the 270EX speedlight for this camera (to be used in bounce mode). It is a real difference maker. I did not use the video so obviously I can not comment on that. However the bright and fully articulating LCD screen would appear to be very convenient for video shooting.Addendum July 8th: I noted in the review that some people will love this camera. Based upon the tone of the comments, that appears to be accurate.Addendum: The Canon EOS-M equipped with the 22mm lens is smaller, lighter, cheaper and takes much better photos in all lighting conditions. Similarly, The Canon SL1/100D is a much better option than the G-1X. The SL1 is similarly priced and weighs only two ounces more when equipped with the kit (STM) lens. The image quality and performance are much better.
Скроменый эксперт
25.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
he Canon G1X is the newest professional level compact camera from Canon. The G1X offers many features normally found on the larger DSLR's in a much smaller package. The G1X however is probably not the best choice for the photography beginner due to its complexity and price point.I decided to update my review of the G1X to incorporate what I've learned about it over the last 10 months. This was originally written when I had stepped up from a G12 and before the G15 (which is closer to a G12) was introduced later.The Canon G1X had an original retail price of $799 placing it closer to the price tags of the entry level DSLRs than to your normal point-and-shoot camera. Amazon currently is running it for $549 and it has been as low as $499 on sale. Used models can be picked up usually starting at around $450.Canon has a great video on their website which describes the G1X in detail and also the mindset of the engineers and designers responsible for it.Some hand's on observations include:1) The lens is a lot nicer and it basically replicates a EF 28-115mm dSLR (no you can't change the lens) with full-time (turn-off able) power IS which works in video or still mode.The CMOS sensor size means the lens is really a 15.1mm to 60.4mm with a 1.9x crop-factor (compared to a 1.6x on the 7D) or a 4.6x on the G12 with it's 6.1mm lens. This is a big improvement.There is an adapter available to use 58mm standard filters. However, you cannot use the filters and the optional screw on "tulip-style" lenshood at the same time. Later I bought a lenscover that retracts similar to the G12/G15. However, using this precludes using the 58mm filters. A CP filter comes in handy.2) Max aperature is up to F/22 from F/8 on the G12 due to that bigger lens.Minimum is a variable F2.8 to 5.8 which makes it the same as a stock lens. I wish they could get the minimum down more, but it is decent in low light.3) The camera feels "better built" meaning it feels solid. it is not a typical point and shoot that you will be putting in a normal pocket though. It is quite bulky4) There is a hot shoe and it is compatible Speedlites 270EX and higher. With a 430EX mounted it is very top heavy. However, you can use a ETTL cord for off-camera flash. They also offer a flash bracket to move the flash position to the left of the camera. It does not have full ETTL functionality.5) The in-camera flash now pops up (from behind the Canon logo) and when it is retracted is off.6) The ISO dial is gone from the top of the camera (it is now up arrow on the back) and the exposure compensation dial is now under the settings. The exposure compensation dial now goes -3 to 3 and you can immediately see the impact on the LCD.ISO range is 100-12,100. Auto ISO is adjustable but the max auto is 1600 (I turn mine down to 800 usually). It is not very strong at higher ISO ratings. Of course, I am spoiled to the low light capabilities of the 5D Mark III now. But it is also not a professional level DSLR.7) It shoots RAW (one of the reasons for getting a G-series in the first place) and you can shoot jpeg+RAW and change aspect ratios on the jpeg shots such as my favorite 1:1 "Photosquared" shots.8) 14.3MP is nice and allows you to easily crop in on shots and still have good detail.9) I do not do much video yet, but you can start filming with the push of a button from any mode on the camera instead of having to go to film mode. Built in stereo microphones (and wind filter function) but no way to hook in an external mic (that is a shame)10) Max exposure time is 1 minute but there is still no "bulb" setting for night-time shooting.Here is also a link to the full specifications on the G1XThe G1X fits a niche for DSLR owners looking for something smaller to carry with them as a day-to-day or travel camera. While it does not replace the flexibility of the DSLR with their inter-changable lenses and L-series glass, it is a great "back-up" camera and/or everyday camera.Many of the shots that I share on Google+ and Facebook are taken with the G1X.See some more shots at [...]
Скроменый эксперт
09.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Well, it depends on your reason for downsizing. For me it was a combination of size and weight, plus a desire to simplify the decision-making and compromises over lens choice.My DSLR kit is a 400d, with 18-55 and 70-300 twin kit, plus 17-85, nifty 50 and 40 pancake. The 17-85 was my all around lens until it broke. Plus it had become heavy enough to be annoying. The 40 pancake was my latest foray into creating a 'good, light' combination, but, the lack of zoom...The size and weight of the G1X take a bit of getting used to. It's in constant live view, so the temptation is to use the thumbs on the bottom, fingers on top, P&S grip, but the G1X first up is too heavy for this. My normal grip is more similar to an SLR grip. For extra stability I use the viewfinder, with a bit of peripheral vision to frame with the LCD. When you get used to it, though, you can use all sorts of positions, such as one handed, or held down at waist level.The sharpness and image detail of the G1X is better than the 400d, thanks to the increase in pixels from 10 to 14 MP. It's pretty cool to get more detail zooming in on my Mac than less, and cropping is a lot more fun. The trade-off is it doesn't handle highlights that well, you have to manage contrasts more carefully. In particular, overcast skies are a double whammy for exposure: subjects are more dimly lit, and the white sky gives off more light than a clear blue sky. I have been having some success, however, with the following settings: mycolor contrast -2, icontrast shadow correction auto, exposure lock on the sky.Results with the built in flash are disappointing compared to the SLR, but that's to be expected. Stay away from light-colored walls, the flash just bounces brightly from the wall, leaving subjects underexposed and skin tones greenish. When I need a bit of extra flash I use Kids and Pets mode. It's a pity the 2.8 aperture happens only at the widest angle, because you need it when taking indoor portraits, but the perspective makes faces too distorted. For some flash / low light shots I use my C1 mode set to ISO 800, shortcut button to digital tele converter, front scroll wheel to step zoom. I use my external flash more than with the SLR.I've had no problems with macro and focussing speed. I don't do insect macros but the teleconverter is plenty good enough for flower close-ups.Exposure simulation is a big thing. I know most modern cameras have it, but it gives you a lot more confidence in experimenting with manual settings.Overall I find the G1X an excellent learning camera. If you want a point and shot that can handle all conditions, buy an SLR. But if you want a camera that inspires you to walkabout, experiment with subject matter, exposure, and shooting angles, and still get that real-camera feel, the G1X is fills that spot perfectly.You can see my sample pictures under the website link of my profile, or davidsg1x under tinyurl.
Скроменый эксперт
29.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The following is from a three-part review of the Canon G1 X that I did on my blog. The sample photographs discussed in this blog can be viewed starting at:[...]This begins a three-part review on Canon's latest semiprofessional compact camera--the G1 X. Today we'll focus on how this camera was selected and highlight the performance of Canon's latest image processor the DIGIC 5 and the effectiveness of this camera's built-in image stabilization.Canon G1 X with 15.1-60.4 (28-112mm in 35mm equivalency) f/2.8-5.8 lens.If you've been following this blog since April 2, then you've been viewing the progression of our last cruise trip. Last week we covered Bruges, Belgium, and this week I was going to end the series with our two-day stay in Brussels. I'm going to postpone that series finale until next week, as I have some other information I would like to impart.So, have you enjoyed the photographs over the past five weeks? If so, then you can give at least partial credit to my latest photographic tool. More on that in a moment.I really enjoy DSLR photography. For that I have a Canon EOS 5D with a 24-105mm f/4.0L Image-Stabilized lens and, a 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Image Stabilized telephoto lens, and a 430EX Speedlite external flash. The 5D is a great camera capable of great images at even fairly high ISO settings. Problem is that it's a boat anchor around your neck. When mated to my 24-105mm lens, the darned thing weighs in at a massive 3 pounds, 7.2 ounces (1,565 grams)! And don't even get me started on the conspicuousness of the size. It's like trying to hide a toaster oven.So, for most international travel I like to take a couple of small travel zooms--my Panasonic DMC-ZS3 and DMC-ZS6--and leave the Rock of Gibraltar at home. Those Panasonics are great little point-and-shoots with a fantastic zoom range (25-300mm in 35mm equivalency), but they have some serious limitations. The ZS6 has limited controls for aperture and shutter speed, as well as the ability to provide some manual control. The ZS3 won't even do that much. Because of their small sensor size (1/2.33"--6.08 x 4.56mm), neither is very good at anything above ISO 400, and the image actually starts to degrade well before even that. Neither stores images in raw format. Still, you can take award-winning photographs with them if you understand photography and how to get the most out what little control the ZS series offers.But I still wanted more in the way of creative control, better high ISO performance, increased resolution, and the wider latitude that raw gives you in post-processing. With this latest once-in-a-lifetime trip to Normandy coming up, I started doing my research for another camera system.For travel photography I would need in order of importance:1) Wide angle capability for landscapes, preferably starting in at around 24mm (in 35mm equivalency).2) Good low-light capabilities for photographing interiors of monasteries, churches, cathedrals, fortresses, etc. That means a fast lens at wide angles (f/2.0 or better would be ideal), good performance at higher ISO settings (at least ISO 800, preferably even higher), and exceptional image stabilization (at least 3-stops) for hand-held shots.3) Good low-light means a fairly large sensor. There is simply no way around that using current technology. This means I would have to balance the need for a large sensor against the desire to keep the camera/lens combination small and light.4) Moderate telephoto capability for zooming in on architectural details (I like at least 105mm).Here's what I didn't need:1) Fast focusing. In landscapes it's all about the framing and light conditions. Capturing action is toward the bottom of any travel photographer's priority.2) High frames-per-second. Again that's for capturing sports action, playful puppies, rambunctious kitties, and annoyingly hyperactive children.Here's what I was willing to give up:1) Interchangeable lenses, if the range was close enough to my specifications (see above). There's nothing more bothersome than specks of dust on the sensor, and changing lenses in the field is an open invitation for these insidious invaders. Plus, it's heck trying to get cleaning solution for camera sensors past TSA--guns and knives seem to slip through with alarming regularity, but you'd better not have more than three ounces of anything wet, up to and including Granny's Depends it would seem.2) Macro capability. Nice to have for close-ups of flowers, but landscapes and architecture don't normally require it.3) Wide aperture at mild zoom ranges. That's a hallmark of a portrait lens, as it defocuses the background and directs the viewer's attention to the person being photographed.Given this list, my search for a new travel camera began to look like a tall order. Most bridge cameras have more zoom range than I would ever need, but their small sensor sizes (usually around 1/1.8"--7.176 x 5.319mm) meant I would once again be sacrificing ISO
Скроменый эксперт
09.05.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I really, really liked this camera, but decided to return it due to focusing issues. There's a lot to love, but it just wasn't for me.First, the good: - Nice image quality, especially distant subjects - Nice handling, especially if you're used to G-series or EOS bodies - Relatively compact, considering the size of the sensor. Low-end dSLR image quality in a smaller package. - Very good low-light performance - Decent (practical) zoom range suitable for the vast majority of needs - Articulating LCD is nice, solid - Has a real thumb dial as well as a wheel in front of the shutter, making it excellent for Manual exposure shooting (one for the f/stop, the other for shutter speed) - Raw modeNow, the bad: - Close focusing ability is horrible compared to other G-series; lens design limitations due to large sensor - Close focusing accuracy is not so good; mine misfocused a lot - Slow slow slow. Slow focus, slow shot-to-shot, slow playback-to-shoot performance - Exposure compenstation dial requires the use of left hand; better to shoot in 'M' and ignore Exp compensation dial altogether; f/stop and shutter speed can be controlled via dial/wheel for one-handed shooting - Depth of field. While the larger sensor provides more bokeh than other G-series cameras, it does not provide enough bokeh to really be that desirable. The larger sensor is also less forgiving than previous G-series with regards to focusing. With mediocre focusing performance, this is a real issue. If you're shooting wide open, zoomed to tele, and/or focusing close, there's a good chance your subject will not be sharp. At least with dSLRs (larger sensors), focusing is far more precise. - Price is too high considering the performance, size, image quality, etc. But then again, Leicas are overpriced too, all things considered :-)I'm a photographer who shoots professionally with Canon 5D2 bodies, and have been shooting Canon SLRs, both film and digital, since the mid-90s. I picked up the G1X after giving my G11 away to a friend. The reason for wanting a smaller camera was mainly for personal projects and lightweight travel where image quality isn't critical (I wouldn't dare shoot a paid commission with anything less than my dSLRs). I think for the price, you could do much better getting a budget Micro Four-Thirds (MFT) body and a lens or two and save a significant amount of money. Either that or an entry level dSLR kit if size isn't too much of an issue. The G1X will probably outperform most MFT bodies in low-light, but for the price, there are simply too many shortcomings. For 30-40% less money, the G1X may be worth it. At its current price, no way.I settled on an Olympus EPL1 with pancake lens and zoom lens for a little more than half the price of the G1X. It doesn't perform as well as the G1X, nor is it built as good, but for the money, I can't complain. Plus the Oly with pancake lens mounted is more compact than the G1X.######################################################################EDIT 6/13/2012: Downgraded to two stars after using the G1X again:* Image quality - 4 stars* Focusing - 2 stars* Speed - 2 stars* Price - 2 star* Size - 1 starSo that's 11 stars/5 = 2.2 stars rounded off to 2 stars.I noticed that the price of the G1X has dropped some twenty bucks. When it goes down another $150, I think it might be a decent buy and perhaps I'll upgrade my rating :-).The reason for this update is that I shot about a hundred frames this evening with a friend's G1X, and it was slower than I remembered (used a Class 10 SD card). Shot indoors, incandescent lighting. Focused quite poorly in this lighting, which is to be expected. This was especially true at closer range (~4 to 8 feet). However, for those images I was able to capture, image quality was quite good, even at ISO1600 (though I missed several shots due to focusing and slowness).I also used another friend's Panasonic GH2 this evening. What a fantastic camera. Fast focus, more compact than the G1X, and the flexibility of the interchangeable lenses are a win win win in my eyes. 20mm/1.7 pancake lens is very compact and much faster than the G1X lens. 14mm-42mm lens is a nice all-around street lens. Longer teles are also available, but I didn't try any; it's nice to have that option though. Image quality was good up to ISO1600. Image quality seems pretty comparable to the G1X, but with more flexibility. I think I just found my next camera. Price for the body only is about the same as the G1X, but I already have some micro four-thirds lenses. The GH2 is a camera I would consider using for certain paid commissions. Maybe not as a primary body, but certainly as a backup to one of my 5D2s. I think I just found my next camera. I still have to try the Olympus OM-D, which another friend of mine raves about.More thoughts...- If you're the type of person who wants good low-light image quality, but don't care about performance, this camera may be for you.- If you like shooting static subjects (not at close range
Скроменый эксперт
14.04.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
A few years ago Thom Hogan posted a "Compact Camera Challenge" ([...]) in his excellent blog, in which he lamented the lack of compact cameras with a large sensor. Despite the development of digital photography technology for the past two decades, stated Hogan, "the camera makers simply don't have any idea of what many of their customers really want." In Hogan's view, consumers will be well served if there was a compact camera with a larger sensor that met certain standards he deemed essential for a serious photographer.I stumbled onto Hogan's challenge as I was looking for the same thing. And since that time I have been waiting and hoping for such a camera. I use a DSLR (Canon EOS 10D and EOS Xti) almost exclusively, but grow tired of lugging the camera and those heavy lenses on each trip as well as the lens changing for those casual outings. The end result is that I now don't bother to even bring a camera with me on some of my trips. I know there are those mirror-less cameras, but the prospect of buying a whole new set of lenses and change them during shooting had discouraged me from jumping into them.The Canon Powershot G1X is exactly the camera I have been waiting for. It has in fact exceeded all the criteria laid out in Hogan's challenge. So I immediately bought it, even though the $800 price tag is on the high side.After playing around with it in the past few days I have gained a better picture of what this camera is (and isn't). I'm still very pleased with it. In the mean time I also feel that depending on what you use your camera for and what your level of enthusiasm is, there might be better alternatives. I'll try to summarize what I have found below in more details.1. Image Quality (Sensor). The greatest strength of this camera is its ability to take SUPERB quality images. The lens is very sharp. The quality of images taken under low light situation (which is pretty much the case if you take indoor pictures) is UNSURPASSED by any other compact camera. I have shot several images at ISO 3200, something I had never done even with my DSLR, and the images are completely usable. In fact, up to ISO 1600 the noise level is negligible. Numerous reviews have confirmed this experience. You can find various sample images online, including a large number of them on DPReview. You may also find some of images I have taken at[...]2. Lens Quality. So far I'm very pleased with it. It is a very sharp lens. The 28-115mm zoom is practical for most shooting situations. I find the lens to be very sharp overall. However, at the widest setting of 28mm the barrel distortion is quite evident --- in fact it is very pronounced. If you shoot in JPEG at 28mm the images looks far less distorted because it has been corrected in the camera firmware. Of course, this means you do see some softness away from the center of the frame. But when you shoot in raw and open it in Photoshop (after converting it to Adobe dng format), you see the pronounced distortion. This is something most of the "official" reviews have missed.The lens, other than at its widest setting, is quite slow. I do understand that this is a limitation of the compactness of this camera.3. Features. As an advanced compact camera, like other Powershot G-series cameras, the G1X comes with all kinds of user controls that are essential for enthusiasts. I will not go into details. DPReview ([...]) has just posted its full review of the camera, and many features are discussed there. There are also a number of features that people who don't care for user controls will find intriguing. For example, there is a "smile detection" setting that will take three pictures automatically if it detects a smile. I have tested this feature, and it seems to work fine. If you want a camera packed with features that suit both novices and professionals, the G1X will not disappoint you. I highly recommend one to go through the full manual (downloadable from Canon website) to get to know all the features.4. Focus. The G1X has been criticized by just about every review for its slow autofocus. But I find this to be an overreaction. I certainly have not noticed that the focus is slow or inaccurate. If anything, I find it to be quite good. Sure it is no match for an SLR, but I have used many compact cameras, and the G1X stacks up pretty well. In lab testing the G1X is slower than the state of the art compact cameras by a fraction of a second on average, but to most people, even seasoned professionals, I don't believe this is an issue. The G1X also has a very useable manual focus, conveniently controlled with a dial and viewed on the LCD with a digital "magnifying glass."A bigger problem is its inability to focus in close range, so one must often switch between normal focus and macro focus modes. Fortunately this is not so difficult for the G1X.5. Macro. Like everyone else had said, this is not made for it.6. Usability/Performance. The controls are a mixed bag. In some cases they are well designed.
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 155.
