Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 6D Kit

I bought this camera after long researches including many positives and negatives on the net. after all im very very very happy with this camera. i wrote down the advantages and disadvantages of this beauty that im remembered. i hope this will give u an idea.(+) :-its cheapest full frame canon camera. because of this it can benefit all the 35mm features.1. you can use the exact angles write on the lens. example: 24mm is actually the 24mm on this camera.2. you can take pictures with better bokeh at the same position compared to the crop dslrs thanks to its bigger sensor size.3. the iso performance is lot better. iso 6400 is very usable at native size (20mp). and let me give you a trick. if you select the sraw, you will increase the pixel size twice. you get 5mp but if you are in very low light condition and if your lens does not have and big aperture you get less noise at this 5mp. this called pixel binning. i go to 25600 iso with very clear pictures at 5mp with this feature.-its not much heavy.-its grip and the buttons give a solid and comfortable feeling. especially shutter release button and aperture wheel.-it have beautiful and crisp lcd.-its hardware and price is very optimum and enough.-silent shutter is useful in many conditions.-video quality is fine.-the raw quality is identical with all canon full frame dslrs. i shoot raw all the time and edit it with photoshop. i think you should take RAW always.-it have a WIFI. this is absolutely amazing. i wont shot myself without the wifi. i connected my mobile to 6d. its very useful.-it have one SD card. i think this is advantage because SD card and readers can be found everywhere for transfer.(-) :-it did not have a fast autofocusing system like 5d3. if you shoot fast things, this camera may not be helpful for you. (like sports)

The 6d is BETTER in low light than the 5D III and other brands in the same or even higher categories. You can bump up the ISO about 2 stops more. (Video to 6400 and Photos to 25,600). Now think about that... this means you can SAVE A FORTUNE on lenses. So instead of a 70-200 2.8 lens, you can get the F4 for half the price. You can use the 24-70 F4 IS rather than the F2.8 IS II for half the price. So not only do you save $1,500 on the camera, but you'll save thousands on lenses. (of course you can spend the same and just enjoy even better low light performance compared to 5D III etc.).I'm surprised this point hasn't been shouted from the rooftops.This is my kit so far and what I paid for it:Canon 6d - $1,400 (got it for $1,999 with 24-105 then sold the lens for $600 - not here)Canon 24-70 F4 lens - $799 ($999 less the rebate of $200 - this was a one-off deal not here)Canon 70-200 F4 - $564 (Amazon - $643 less $80 rebate)Canon 40mm 2.8 Prime - $149 (Amazon)Total: $2,914For under 3k have an amazing full frame setup for photography and video with 3 superb lenses (for less than the 5D III body only). To compare, that would be about $6k on the 5D III (taking into account that you'll need F2.8 rather than F4 on the lenses - granted you'll have shallower depth of field).I know for sports/wildlife the focus points and the speed of 5D III is superior and those who need those features know this. The other main advantage of 5D III is moire for video. 'For the rest of us' there's the Canon 6d.(You have to ask yourself... is the autofocus, faster frame rate and moire / anti-ailissing worth the $3k extra).

I cannot describe how wonderful the picture quality is for this camera. Photos come out spectacular even with extreme low light circumstances, and the center point works great for focusing in low light; using a 70-200 f/2.8 paired with this camera I am able to take pictures in near total darkness and still get ability to autofocus w/ output images nearly free of noise. It has a large enough buffer to take bursts of RAW+JPG without slowing down like cheaper cameras, and build quality is fantastic. This camera feels great in the hand!In terms of weaknesses, the autofocus system on this camera is dated with 11 autofocus points only 1 of which is cross-type. This means it has far less cross-type sensors than a Canon Rebel T5i which costs less than half the price. That being said, the autofocus does work fine for weddings, regular people shots, and landscapes. In a scenario with sports or one that requires constant tracking, you will likely be disappointed, though. So if you want a sports camera, this is not it! For other general events it is great.Another weakness is the lack of joystick or touchscreen. This is an issue as previewing pictures is a bit of a chore using the directional arrows to zoom around images. If the camera had a touchscreen or joystick, moving the zoomed area around would be much easier. The lack of joystick also makes changing the autofocus point more of a hassle, though you probably want to be using center point only most of the time.Finally, contributing to the loss of a star was the EOS Remote Utility. The PC version was a bit of a hassle to install (you need to turn off your firewall to link it up) and there is no app for Lumia Windows Phone & Surface 2 which is disappointing.In summary, the output of this camera is incredible as is the build quality. But a dated autofocus system and clunky interface means it is no replacement for the 5DIII. Still, for the money it is an excellent deal, so I would give it 4/5 stars!

I have been taking pictures with Canons early digital as well as the the latest models. I use every setting from full manual to auto depending upon the condition I meet. I read up on all the materials presented with each camera and from my 20D, 40D, T2i and T4i I've gone through many lenses and settings. I never wanted another high end brand but I have used Nikon, Olympus, Sony and Panasonic in various applications. The main camera system I use other than Canon is Fuji, which has high quality mid range cameras.To sum it up since there are so many highly detailed reviews and specifics this camera captures perfect details in every image I take. I wanted a camera to grow with my needs and really give me an edge since I'm not very high on the professional realm of picture taking. With this system I was given the most bang for my buck. A great photographer can take excellent images with just about any camera, I on the other hand need some help and this camera makes many images look professional. I have several lenses that I've kept from the previous cameras and have not had any issues with zoom, macro, kit or telephoto lenses. You will not be dissapointed when you hold this camera in your hands. It's a piece of art ready to explode onto paper your imagination captures in digital format!Highly recommended! Keep up the great work Canon!

I'm a young amateur breaking into the world of professional photography. I don't know all the technical aspects of cameras and lenses, but I do know how to take a good photo. That being said, I did a lot of research on different camera models when I was deciding on an upgrade. I was initially set on a 7D for its price and ability to be used with EF-S glass (I have a 350D from back in 2005). However, I love shooting indoors and in low light, so with more digging, full-frame became the ideal choice.The deal on Amazon was AMAZING for this camera at the time I purchased ($1575 for the body only); I bought it, along with an EF 50mm f/1.4 to start. WELL, I am absolutely IN LOVE with this camera. The low-light functioning is superb, and the image quality (especially at high ISO) is simply astounding. I have not had any issues with the AF, as many reviewers find it to be a down-side to the 6D, but I also do not need many AF points since I don't often shoot action photography. One thing that I am not thrilled about is how the shutter speed only goes up to 1/4000. That is a bummer for me, but certainly not a deal breaker. I have yet to set-up the WiFi/GPS functioning so I can't speak on its performance, but it's pretty sweet that it has this option.All in all, I am extremely happy with my purchase and I feel I made the right decision. Granted, I have not had the camera THAT long yet but I am content with the results I have gotten so far--see some example images below. I also plan to update this review after I have used the camera more.If you are teetering on the edge about upgrading to full-frame (and thinking about the 6d), my answer is DO IT!Photos:[...][...]

If you're reading this review then you, like me, probably have read a bunch of user reviews trying to talk yourself into or out of a purchase. When I was looking to upgrade to a full frame it was either this $2300 6D kit or a $3400 5dmk3. For the life of me I didn't know why I hesitated so long. I mean the 6D is a full frame, shoots practically in the dark, has wifi, has GPS, and takes all my old batteries. And in the end I didn't have an extra $1100 for the 5dmk3 anyway!I have not been disappointed. The images the 6D puts out, when taken correctly, are phenomenal. Image quality (IQ) alone makes this camera is well worth it. All the other features are secondary like GPS and wifi. And how about the features the 5dmk3 has that this 6D doesn't have? Headphone input? I'm a photographer. 61 focus points? I've always needed just one focus point cross type or otherwise. Two storage slots? Seriously? I feel if the 6D had two storage slots and the 5d had three it would be the same silly conversation.

I am truly impressed by this little camera. I upgraded from a Canon 7D to this thing. This is my first full frame camera and I can honestly say it is a huge upgrade from the 7D. I love almost everything about this camera. When I first opened it I was pleasantly surprised at how much lighter and smaller it is than the 7D.I felt like I had to get used to the controls all over again. But, once I got the hang of them it almost seems to flow a little better than with the 7D. I do end up using the quick menu much more often than on my 7D.The one and only thing I don't like about the camera is actually something that I just assumed would be there. I expected having the 3x3 grid when looking into the view finder which is something that does come with the 7D. The only way to have a 3x3 grid is by using the LCD screen....which I never ever use as a viewfinder.No matter what bells and whistles a camera has, it finally comes down to one thing, image quality. It is such a huge upgrade over the 7D. When I process my pictures and look closely at them the difference is staggering. On my old 7D I would have to mess with white balancing all the time, the 6D is spot on every time left on auto white balancing. Comparing the 6D to the 7D there is major difference in noise with the 6D a clear winner. As I look through old shots and comparing them to new shots I feel that this alone made the 6D a worth while purchase. I give this camera a high recommendation!

I am a Canon fan and I owned several Canon cameras and lenses, but I am extremely disappointed by their manufacturing quality control.According to my personal experience, many copies of this camera from early 2013 until now are installed with defective CMOS sensors, which randomly show up dead/defective pixels, even under relatively low ISO ( smaller than 3200 ).I bought mine from Amazon, it was a brand new camera sold and shipped by Amazon.com. The excitement own this camera, which was my first Full Frame camera quickly faded away and I became very frustrated when I notice two issues: 1. the Pentaprism and the focus screen were stained with a dust spot as well as a spot of smudge, even though they were very slight and hard to notice, I still feel it is unacceptable for such a high priced semi-professional equipment.2. the camera's image sensor show up dead/defective pixels under certain ISO settings and lighting conditions, even under relatively low ISO range.Shame on Canon!

My wife is very happy with the Canon 6D. She is, objectively speaking, an excellent amateur photographer. We have been considering upgrading from our 4 year old Canon T1i for about a year to a full-frame camera. The thoughts of buying the 5D Mark ii were not appealing because of its age and the 5D Mark iii was just too out of reach for an amateur photographer. The 6D does everything we need it to do and then some and was significantly less expensive than the 5D Mark iii. The ISO range is just so much better from what she was used to and was able to almost completely move away from flash photography indoors, eliminating the shadows that were almost always cast by the flash. Plus, the weight difference for someone that is small in stature is very appealing to my wife as well. Overall, the 6D has been the perfect purchase for us. Sure, we gave up all the autofocus points of the Mark iii and some resolution, but I don't think the price difference can be justified for anyone less than professional photographers.

This camera takes fantastic photos at a good price. However, Canon seems to be having some quality control issues with the 6d. The first body I received creaked very slightly when squeezed. This gave it an unreliable feel and I worried about it and so sent it back. The second body I received seemed to have some autofocus issues issues--it simply took too long for it fix its focus. When it finally focused it was perfect but this proved to be very difficult when shooting people. My Canon T4i focused faster and more reliably. I ended up buying a 6d I could test from a local camera chain that agreed to match Amazon's price. I do have some Xmas Amazon gift cards and will probably buy an Sl1 for travel--I hope I don't have any issues with it. This camera really has some great features and its images are terrific. On a side note, when returning this camera to Amazon you have to pay return shipping and then request a return shipping refund from customer service. I'd prefer to just print an Amazon UPS label and have them deduct a small shipping fee from my refund as they do with just about everything else. Actually, I'd prefer it if Canon just provided with Amazon with quality merchandise so I wouldn't have to bother with returns.

I used to have a Canon 5D Mark II, but sold it and bought a Sony A77. There were things to like about that camera, but the noisy sensor wasn't one of them. That became more and more of an issue to me, so I decided to move back to Canon. Of the three choices I was looking at -- going back to a 5D Mark III, moving up to a 5D Mark III, or moving "down" to a 6D -- the 6D seemed the best combination of capability and value. Full-frame, built-in GPS, lighter in weight, SD cards vs. CF (means I can use the same media as my infrared-converted Canon T3i), compatible with the few accessories I had left from the 5D Mark II… and a very reasonable price.To date, I am very happy with the 6D. It's done everything I've asked of it, working with a range of lenses from multiple manufacturers: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L, Vivitar Series 1 90mm f/2.5, Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6, Tamron AF 28-75mm f/2.8 SP XR Di LD, and Zeiss Jena Flektogon 65mm f/2.8. I see no difference in the quality of the images from those I shot with the 5D Mark II. The GPS is a great addition because it simplifies mapping landscape and travel images.Your needs may differ from mine, and you may find other features of the more expensive cameras that matter to you. For still imagery, from landscapes to portraits, this camera suits me down to the ground.

This camera is great in low light situations. I moved up from the Rebel T1i. I also had the XTi. The difference is night and day. Things to note when changing from a cropped sensor to a Full Frame: - Your fish eye may not work. (I had the Rikonon 8mm with the hood you can't remove) - you can see the hood because of how wide a Full Frame is. - Your Wide Angle may look like a Fish Eye (my Tamron 10-24mm has a full circle at 10mm and the edges don't disappear until 15mm (without circular polarizing filter) or 16mm (with circular polarizing filter). Doesn't bother me since the Canon wide angle goes from 16-35mm. - 24-105mm works better on the full frame than the cropped sensor. It just looks brighter in general and there's better background blur. - 70-300mm - doesn't look like it's zooming as far. - 50mm 1.8f - still great even if the build isn't great - The cable release port is different than the Rebels. I didn't know that so I found out the hard way.The lack of onboard flash kind of made me skeptical about getting it, but since it has really high ISO and it is a professional grade camera, that fear is silly. I chose this over the Canon 5D mkIII because of the price difference and the options that came on the camera like WIFI and GPS. I like those features more than having a secondary memory slot for a compact flash card.The body build is nice and solid. I accidentally tested the weather proofing when a random wave crashed on me at the Lanai Lookout on Oahu. (oops)If you're looking to jump from cropped sensor to Full Frame, this is a great option.

1) light and small for a FF camera, almost the same as the 60D.2) AF is amazing (-3ev) in dim lighting conditions, accurate and fast3) ISO settings have been enhanced to set lowest shutter (this avoids blur caused by default choices of 1/30 or 1/40 in auto iso mode)4) clean jpg even in 12800 ISO. Canon did some magic work in their NR algorithm in camera jpg. I cannot obtain the clean image even using Adobe5) GPS is very accurate (though a little slow to lock). It remains to tag last known position if you walked into a building or GPS signal is lost. Battery drain is not very noticeable curiously. However you must not leave it on over night with a battery.6) Color rendition (WB) is excellent. Indoors tends to be a little more yellow than 5D mark II (which tends to be reddish brown).7) Ergonomics is less than the 5D series due to removal of the joy stick and left hand buttons. Most operations are completely right hand.8) Tends to underexpose in bright light with shadows almost too dark (Canon over corrected this)Overall this is a powerful camera inside of a plastic feeling case. Great for travel and street photography.

I purchased the 6D this spring to replace my 40D. I also picked up a Nikon D600 at work at a similar time frame. Bottom line is I love this camera and prefer it over the D600 even though on paper the D600 is superior. It shoots great in low light, the 24-105 is a great general purpose lens, even it has a bit of distortion. A common complaint is the unsophisticated autofocus system has not been an issue for me, 99% of the time I always use the center focus point and reframe after focusing on what I want to be the sharpest, and in this fashion the 6D out performs all other cameras I've used due to the hypersensitive center focus point. If you shoot a lot of moving targets, this could be an issue for you, but for the rest of us, it is not.The only complaint I have about the camera has to do with HDR mode. The nikon will not rotate the mirror for each exposure whereas the 6D does, this seems so unnecessary and seems to prolong the amount of time required to obtain the image. Also Canon intentionally crippled the HDR mode to only save in JPEG to provide differentiation to the 5D Mk III. What is most annoying about only allowing HDR in JPEG mode is the interface doesn't make it at all clear why HDR cannot be enabled if your output format includes RAW. Although the interface on Canon SLRs is not very good, Nikon is arguably worse, and certainly no better. No one buys these cameras for their interface, so there's not a lot of emphasis. So, despite the possibility for confusion, this camera is awesome.

I have had this camera for 3 weeks now and have taken about 150 pictures. Before the 6D I had the 7D and was looking to move up to a full frame sensor. I am amazed on a daily basis with what the 6D camera can do. The detail of shots is amazing and shooting in low light is just plain fun. I can take really great pictures now by accident where with the 7D you needed to work at it some. It's also like I have a new group of lenses,,, my existing group of EF lenses really show what they can do with a full frame camera. Also, kudos to Amazon on this sale. Delivery was earlier then expected and their follow up with me was outstanding. So if you are debating the move from crop sensor to full frame this is a great reasonably priced choice.

I upgraded from a 60D to this camera and have been more than satisfied. I was primarily interested in it's low light performance as I like to shoot without flash. I took pictures of my company Christmas party on a boat at night using the Canon 50mm f1.8 lens and got some great shots in spite of the darkness. The 24-105 lens is also great, amazingly sharp for a zoom lens. I use it to take great pictures of my grandson. This is a perfect camera for the serious amateur, especially if you like to shoot in existing light.

I have invested quite a bit in cannon glass and therefore wanted to stay with the brand. I currently own the 7D and was overall satisfied but no "wow" factor. After researching extensively, decided to make the switch to full frame. I was very concerned about only 11 point focus with only ONE cross type on the 6D. However, after shooting with it for only 2 days, I can definitely say AF on 6D is faster and more accurate than my 7D. I can finally say "wow" with the images taken with 24-105L and 70-200L lenses. They just pop with very little noise even at ISO 6400. The only slight difficulty I have had so far is setting up the EOS remote app but was finally able to set it up. It seems to link better if set up through your wifi network rather than using the camera as the wifi node.

I've been using Canon cameras for a long time. This camera is my first foray into a full-frame and I'm really happy with it. The only issue I really have is the FPS is too slow for my needs, although I was pretty sure this would be a problem before I bought it so I didn't take off any stars. For the difference in price from the 5d, I'll live with the slow FPS for a while. I am disappointed in the Wifi with my computer--the camera is very slow to respond to commands from the interface and using wifi disables the ability to use a remote shutter. I don't "need" the wifi so it's not a big deal, just disappointing because the performance is not what I was led to expect from the information provided by Canon.

I admit I was a bit skeptical, although most reviews were positive, there were some negative comments here and there. Top Shutter speed only 1/4000...top flash speed is 1/180. But to me that is really nitpicking. I would like a higher flash speed sync, but the 5DIII only goes to 1/200..so..I'm not overly concerned. I received the camera today, and out of the box..I wasn't blown away. It felt at least as well built as the 7D, and smaller than 5DIII. However, once I saw the images files I was hooked. This camera produces beautiful images, and I'm impressed with the high ISO performance...good detail even at 256,000 ISO. Not that I would ever shoot that in normal settings. The detail is quite impressive even more so at lower ISOs..such as 8000. And just a few years ago, we thought 6400..was fantastic..even though it didn't have as much resolution and detail. The smaller size of the camera is not a drawback, I can always add a grip, but it also allows it to be a more carry anywhere camera for me. I see this camera as an available light portrait machine. I plan to shoot much more more with it over the next few days. It's more than a capable back up to my 5DIII. I highly recommend this camera.

This Camera has been berated by many "Pros" who notice the lack of some of the features found on the 5DIII, and even the lower priced models such as the 70D, and Rebel T4i & T5i. Yes, that's true, but this Camera's Images paired with good lenses are equivalent to the more expensive Models. The Autofocus has worked well for Landscape & Portraits. It wouldn't be the choice for Sports or Fast Action. I'm not a Pro, but shoot a lot and have won a Competition, and do Portraiture. The Low Light/ High ISO capabilities of ths Camera are outstanding! I probably won't use the GPS much, but I have paired it with my IPhone to remotely shoot and review images. I do like the Vari-angle Screen on my T4i, but the remote app fixes that problem. I purchased a Tamron SP90mm 1:1 Macro for this Camera and have done 3 Portrait Shoots in the last Month with the Camera & Lens. The results have been better than I could have hoped for. I found this Camera on Amazon for $1587.00 which I thought was a smoking' deal. The Big Box Stores sell them for appx. $1900.00. (Body Only). I love this Camera!

I've been a Nikon user for some years now and decided to buy this especific model for various reasons. The most important one's are in no particular order of importance or anything like that:1 - it's a Flagship camera of the Canon brand and it's not so expensive.2 - their software for capturing video is awesome. You can record anything you want at the ISO that you want.3 - The differences between this one and their most expensive one (Canon EOS 5D Mark III or 1D C or 1D X) are minimal.

Is the Canon EOS 6D worth it? I would say, yes, depending on where you are upgrading from. If you are coming from a Rebel series Canon camera like the T3i/T4i and looking to make the next jump up, the price for a full frame sensor just fell dramatically and you will be in love with this camera. If you currently are using a 5D Mark II, it's a tough sell as you are in another category of camera, and the 6D is only a marginal improvement over an existing 5D Mark II - unlike a 5D Mark III which is a pretty big improvement over the Mark II in a few key areas for wedding photographers (AF, Dual Slots, ISO, etc). For a wedding photographer, this camera would be a great choice for a second body at a great price compared to getting a 2nd 5D Mark III. With both cameras having the new DiGiC 5+ processor, the files come out very similar to one another and are easier to match colors while editing which is a huge bonus when you have thousands of wedding photos to go through (and a giant relief for video where color matching is a bit trickier). As a video camera I feel like it's a solid choice, and wedding videographers in particular will love this camera. The full frame sensor and ISO sensitivity mean you can still get a very usable image in dark settings, and unless you shoot a lot of outdoor wedding videos (Indian weddings for us are typically in hotels or banquet halls), you will appreciate this feature a lot! That said, the much cheaper Canon 60D (that's six-zero) which the 6D is based on does have these similar features (30 minute movies) for a much cheaper price just with a crop sensor inside and a bit less ISO performance, and would still make an excellent video camera. Overall, I would say this camera definitely gets a big thumbs up from me, getting a full frame camera with amazing ISO sensitivity for under 2 grand is a big deal and for our specific needs of dimly lit indoor weddings that is worth the premium over Canon's other recent crop-sensor cameras. If