Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 6D Kit

I upgraded from a 60D to this camera and have been more than satisfied. I was primarily interested in it's low light performance as I like to shoot without flash. I took pictures of my company Christmas party on a boat at night using the Canon 50mm f1.8 lens and got some great shots in spite of the darkness. The 24-105 lens is also great, amazingly sharp for a zoom lens. I use it to take great pictures of my grandson. This is a perfect camera for the serious amateur, especially if you like to shoot in existing light.

I have invested quite a bit in cannon glass and therefore wanted to stay with the brand. I currently own the 7D and was overall satisfied but no "wow" factor. After researching extensively, decided to make the switch to full frame. I was very concerned about only 11 point focus with only ONE cross type on the 6D. However, after shooting with it for only 2 days, I can definitely say AF on 6D is faster and more accurate than my 7D. I can finally say "wow" with the images taken with 24-105L and 70-200L lenses. They just pop with very little noise even at ISO 6400. The only slight difficulty I have had so far is setting up the EOS remote app but was finally able to set it up. It seems to link better if set up through your wifi network rather than using the camera as the wifi node.

The image quality and high ISO performance from this camera will blow you away. My first impression was that it is a full 2 stops better than my 7D; to be conservative, I will say a stop and a half. Other reviewers have put this sensor at roughly equal to the 5DMK3. I am not sure how it compares to the 1DX, but the fact that we can even ask that question tell you how good this camera is. (The 1DX costs 3 times as much.)At the highest ISO settings, the 6D will take images of things I can barely see. They will not be "fine art" quality, but if you think that Bigfoot is throwing rocks at your cabin in the middle of the night, this camera could make you famous. In slightly brighter conditions, this allows you to use a faster shutter and/or smaller aperture to get the same exposure. Most of the best shots, indoor or out, happen in less than "daylight" conditions.The controls on this camera are simpler and easier to use than the 7D, without giving anything up. (Who really needs a dedicated picture style button?) I also like the locking mode dial, having ruined a number of pictures over the years by brushing this dial on my coat, gloves, camera bag, etc.The built-in GPS is a cool feature, but you should know that it uses power even when the camera is off. My battery went from 97% to 70% overnight, with the switch turned off.I was a little disappointed with the autofocus screen, not so much because of the number of focus points, but their arrangement. I would like to see them extend closer to the edges and corners of the frame, rather than clustering in the center. To be fair, this arrangement is pretty much standard. The 6D is very similar to the 5Dmk2, but with greater low-light sensitivity.This camera is offered with the 24-105L as the kit lens. This is one of the most popular and highly-rated lenses of all time, and in the kit it is real bargain.For me, the 6D is a good complement to the 7D. The 7D has a terrific AF system and gives greater reach to a telephoto lens, while the 6D provides more wide-angle options and superb low-light capability. The 6D is marketed as an "entry level" full frame camera, but I know that many pros are MORE concerned than some enthusiasts about getting a return on their camera dollar. I predict that you will see a lot of pros (who aren't shooting sports) look very closely at this camera.

Let me start with a little background...I'm a professional photographer booked 7 days a week (high fashion, seniors, wedding, engagement etc. I've done work with Wilhelmina, Next etc.) and have been using a T2i and prime lenses (50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.0 and 200mm 2.8L) for years...Never in all this time did I feel the need for a full frame (I know hard to imagine right?). I knew a full frame wasn't going to make my work better...so I had no desire to go full frame. That said, when I needed a new backup camera the price and ISO abilities of the 6D was a no brainer. Yes, it's more than the Rebel series but I have to admit that it's worth the money if for nothing else being able to shoot at almost any ISO and no noise is worth it. I also love the EOS app that allows me to change the settings and fire remotely as well as view on my iphone or iPad....very niceJust remember an expensive oven doesn't make the food taste better...might make the job easier but it's all about the ingredients and the chef. If you're looking at the 6D vs. the 5D III, save your money and buy this one. Almost the same camera...except for a couple small things.

I've been using Canon cameras for a long time. This camera is my first foray into a full-frame and I'm really happy with it. The only issue I really have is the FPS is too slow for my needs, although I was pretty sure this would be a problem before I bought it so I didn't take off any stars. For the difference in price from the 5d, I'll live with the slow FPS for a while. I am disappointed in the Wifi with my computer--the camera is very slow to respond to commands from the interface and using wifi disables the ability to use a remote shutter. I don't "need" the wifi so it's not a big deal, just disappointing because the performance is not what I was led to expect from the information provided by Canon.

I admit I was a bit skeptical, although most reviews were positive, there were some negative comments here and there. Top Shutter speed only 1/4000...top flash speed is 1/180. But to me that is really nitpicking. I would like a higher flash speed sync, but the 5DIII only goes to 1/200..so..I'm not overly concerned. I received the camera today, and out of the box..I wasn't blown away. It felt at least as well built as the 7D, and smaller than 5DIII. However, once I saw the images files I was hooked. This camera produces beautiful images, and I'm impressed with the high ISO performance...good detail even at 256,000 ISO. Not that I would ever shoot that in normal settings. The detail is quite impressive even more so at lower ISOs..such as 8000. And just a few years ago, we thought 6400..was fantastic..even though it didn't have as much resolution and detail. The smaller size of the camera is not a drawback, I can always add a grip, but it also allows it to be a more carry anywhere camera for me. I see this camera as an available light portrait machine. I plan to shoot much more more with it over the next few days. It's more than a capable back up to my 5DIII. I highly recommend this camera.

This Camera has been berated by many "Pros" who notice the lack of some of the features found on the 5DIII, and even the lower priced models such as the 70D, and Rebel T4i & T5i. Yes, that's true, but this Camera's Images paired with good lenses are equivalent to the more expensive Models. The Autofocus has worked well for Landscape & Portraits. It wouldn't be the choice for Sports or Fast Action. I'm not a Pro, but shoot a lot and have won a Competition, and do Portraiture. The Low Light/ High ISO capabilities of ths Camera are outstanding! I probably won't use the GPS much, but I have paired it with my IPhone to remotely shoot and review images. I do like the Vari-angle Screen on my T4i, but the remote app fixes that problem. I purchased a Tamron SP90mm 1:1 Macro for this Camera and have done 3 Portrait Shoots in the last Month with the Camera & Lens. The results have been better than I could have hoped for. I found this Camera on Amazon for $1587.00 which I thought was a smoking' deal. The Big Box Stores sell them for appx. $1900.00. (Body Only). I love this Camera!

I bought the 6D in February with the f/4 L kit lens. It was my first L lens. I was astonished by the images and the sharpness and contrast. Then I picked up the 100mm f/2.8L macro lens and it has become my favorite. A few comments about pros and cons. I have several Canon APS C cameras and this is my first full frame. For sports photos I still prefer my D50 with at least 6fps continuous. I do not consider the 6D 4fps a con. Sports continuous shooting does not require 20MP. News papers do not publish high resolution images. I am still experimenting with customizing my buttons. This camera is just so much fun to play with.OK, pros:The AF system works in the dimmest light.The SDHC is as good as the older CF memory and much less expensive.I do not miss pop-up flash at all. Flash should be taken off camera anyway.The fit and finish of the 6D is excellent.The less noisy shutter does not frighten small animals and insects for Macro work.The white balance is a pleasure to work with.The larger pixels on the sensor are less noisy than APS C sensors.Now cons:The WiFi and GPS are just gimmicks. I have only used the WiFi with a laptop for time-lapse but that was always possible with a USB cable.The D6 is a little too light for L lenses and I worry about the camera/lens mount.I am irritated with warnings when using non-Canon batteries. After all, canon sometimes ships Panasonic or Polaroid batteries with their cameras.Overall, I love this camera and I would recommend it to others. Necessary accessories are a sturdy tripod, a SpeedLight, a remote RC shutter release, and an open mind.Dennis,Thousand Oaks, CA

Very powerful performance in low light conditions and great image quality, like already stated in all reviews I've read before purchase it. The main downside aspect, in my opinion, is the lack of built in flash, which would be very useful for fill in light in backlit portraits (I've already missed it). The HDR is only useful for still landscape shots, because in portraits only a slight movement of the subject (eyes, mouth) results in a blurred final photo. In this aspect, the better dynamic range of Nikon D600/610 is more useful.

I have owned a T3i, 60D, 7D and a 5Dmkii and I have to say that this 6D is truly amazing! I am charging the battery right now, but I had to pop it in for a few test shots just to see how it works in low light situations. I am in a room with only one tiny lamp on and I have been able to catch focus with all 11 focus points and the images are sharp. I will note that the center point does find focus the fastest and in very LITTLE light!I will write more as I explore it, but right now its already better in low light than the 5dmkii! I was debating between a 7D, 5dmkii or another 6D for a backup..... after tonight I am leaning very much towards a 2nd 6D as a backup! But i do like the extra reach that the 7D would provide and the insane ruggedness of it.The only issue is that I have 3 CF cards that wouldn't be used. But i do have 2x 32GB SD cards and 1x 16GB SD card that will work for the time being. I liked the fast focusing of the 7D but in all honesty I wasn't all that impressed with its low lighting quality....which was better on the 5dmkii. The fact that the 6D can go to even higher ISO's with little noise is going to come in very handy.The kit lens is great as well... with the IS, i can hand hold in almost no light with no flash.My main items are portraits, walk around and landscape.in my bag I have a 6D, (6D, 7D or 5Dmkii as a backup), 17-40L F4, 24-105L F4 IS, 50 F1.4, 85 F1.8, and 70-200L F4 IS, 2x 430exii speedlights::EDIT 1/6/2013::I have played around with the wifi and the EOS ap on my iPhone... Pure genius! I can view all the pics on my camera right on my phone and i can control the camera by just my phone from across the house.It has also be decided that as soon as Amazon gets the Body only camera in we will be buying another 6D as our backup.::EDIT 1/22/2013::I am now hesitant about a 2nd back up 6D as the non-canon brand batteries issues is a pretty big deal. $60 for a single battery where $24.99 could get you two Wasabi batteries AND a charger. putting the wasabi battery in my 6D effective dumbed it down... the battery i mean. it can no long display a battery charge level on my 7D nor in the charger. Hopefully the 5dmkiii doesnt have this issue!

I have been a hobby photographer for the last three years. I use my cameras on full manual, have done lots of studying, know my composition, etc. and felt that I was ready to upgrade to full frame. I initially wanted a nikon because I have one and was familiar with them, but the more research I did, I decided that this would be the best bang for my buck. I do not regret my purchase. A good photographer can take good photos even with an inexpensive camera, but this camera captures exquisite detail even in low light. I love it and it is a pleasure to use. I got it with the kit lens and also purchased the 85mm 1.8, and both are excellent lenses. The prime makes for fantastic portraits.

I've been a Nikon user for some years now and decided to buy this especific model for various reasons. The most important one's are in no particular order of importance or anything like that:1 - it's a Flagship camera of the Canon brand and it's not so expensive.2 - their software for capturing video is awesome. You can record anything you want at the ISO that you want.3 - The differences between this one and their most expensive one (Canon EOS 5D Mark III or 1D C or 1D X) are minimal.

Is the Canon EOS 6D worth it? I would say, yes, depending on where you are upgrading from. If you are coming from a Rebel series Canon camera like the T3i/T4i and looking to make the next jump up, the price for a full frame sensor just fell dramatically and you will be in love with this camera. If you currently are using a 5D Mark II, it's a tough sell as you are in another category of camera, and the 6D is only a marginal improvement over an existing 5D Mark II - unlike a 5D Mark III which is a pretty big improvement over the Mark II in a few key areas for wedding photographers (AF, Dual Slots, ISO, etc). For a wedding photographer, this camera would be a great choice for a second body at a great price compared to getting a 2nd 5D Mark III. With both cameras having the new DiGiC 5+ processor, the files come out very similar to one another and are easier to match colors while editing which is a huge bonus when you have thousands of wedding photos to go through (and a giant relief for video where color matching is a bit trickier). As a video camera I feel like it's a solid choice, and wedding videographers in particular will love this camera. The full frame sensor and ISO sensitivity mean you can still get a very usable image in dark settings, and unless you shoot a lot of outdoor wedding videos (Indian weddings for us are typically in hotels or banquet halls), you will appreciate this feature a lot! That said, the much cheaper Canon 60D (that's six-zero) which the 6D is based on does have these similar features (30 minute movies) for a much cheaper price just with a crop sensor inside and a bit less ISO performance, and would still make an excellent video camera. Overall, I would say this camera definitely gets a big thumbs up from me, getting a full frame camera with amazing ISO sensitivity for under 2 grand is a big deal and for our specific needs of dimly lit indoor weddings that is worth the premium over Canon's other recent crop-sensor cameras. If

I've been a professional videographer/cinematographer (and sometimes photographer) for about 4 years now. I've been mainly shooting on the 7D for most of my career, and have shot a good bit on the Nikon D800. The 6D is a camera that I feel has the feature set I most care about. I love the GPS and WIFI features, those are really important for me, not for my professional work at this point, but more for my personal work. (Although I could see it being very useful for scouting new locations, etc.)The camera seems to have a nice build quality, and I like the fact that it is full frame. I wish Canon full frame DSLRs had the ability to auto detect and auto crop if an ASP-C lens was put on. As of now, Canon full frame DSLRs can't use ASP-C sized lenses. I think this is a shame and a waste. The Nikon D800 has the ability to use and leverage ASP-C sized lenses. (Canon, fix this please.)Another bad mark for the camera compared to the Nikon D800/600 is that it does not have the dynamic range, or the ability to pull and push highlights and shadows. Nor does it have the resolution. I didn't think this mattered until actually shooting on the Nikon D800, there is so much information in the shadows and highlights that I never had to shoot HDR. Never. I would shoot brackets, but never actually had to use more than one still to get the exposure I wanted.Besides those two ticks when compared to Nikon, its a solid camera. The WIFI function works great, although could be a bit better. Auto focus could be better.Other features I would want. The ability to shoot 3.5K video. An additional SD card slot. Audio monitoring. (I imagine these will all be in the 6D mark ii, which would get if they are.)

Pros:- Well-built solid feel- Lots of useful features (Wifi, GPS, leveling, HDR)- Low noise- Clean sensor (compared to Nikon D600, which has no oil issues, but still a lot more dust)- No issues with auto-focus points (in practice I got better results than with D600)Cons:- Ergonomics for adjusting ISO/Aperture could be better (very small push buttons near LCD display)- Built in noise-reduction for higher ISO tends to create red/green shading (pretty minor)- Too many stuck/hot pixels on sensor. I understand that stuck pixels are inherent to such sensors and can be dealt with during PP, but the two samples I tried had just too many (and partially visible during short exposures). On one sample one really large area "fixed" itself through - at least I assume - the camera's internal remap, but still too many remained. My main use for this camera was for low-light and night-time photos (utilizing it's excellent low-noise characteristics), but having that many stuck pixels out of the gate is a deal breaker (especially as they tend to accumulate with age - at least from my experience with other cameras).So a really good camera based on features and build-quality. But even putting the pixel issue I experienced aside, while it definitely offers better noise control than the APS-C Canon I wanted to replace, for me it did not yield a large enough improvement in image quality (maybe this is more a testament to the quality of the 18MP APS-C sensor).UPDATED 4/23/13: Upgraded to 4 stars. I tried another sample as my old camera is showing signs of age. While the issue with hot pixels persists, I decided that the amazing performance at higher ISO is too much of a game changer to be ignored (especially for action shots). And for longer exposures (> 1/4 sec) that will suffer from hot pixels, the long exposure noise reduction (basically takes a dark frame and subtracts from the first image) does a decent job (but at the cost of doubling your wait time until the next shot...).

As to be expected after careful consideration...- Poor autofocus technology as far as speed / tracking / recognition go (Almost the exact same as my previous 60D, but with a smaller cluster of points)- lack of the 1.6x crop factor (zooming in 1.6x and comparing directly to a crop sensor, it gives inferior detail)- Not the best focus and live view functions overall - including video. Nikon's newer cameras, handle better- Detail, resolution, and color do not compare to the more expensive Pro DSLR / Medium-Format cameras such as Nikon D800, Leica S2, or Hasselblad. Even the Sigma SD1 Merril gives vastly superior detail+ AMAZING ISO performance. For the first time, I can finally take pictures at night handheld, and have them be presentable.+ Great low light focusing, it is at least 2 full stops better than any camera I have ever used. (Don't expect miracles, it can not focus if there is little to no light, or a dark flat surface)+ Beautiful build quality. Not quite as good as a 7D simply due to the amount of plastic, but my old 60D feels like a toy in comparison. The plastic top plate fades in to the magnesium alloy so smoothly that you can hardly tell they are different materials.+ Rubber grip stays on the camera tightly much better than some other canons have in the past, doesn't peel away.+ Wifi is more than just a gimmick.. The phone connectivity is very useful (especially since there is no swivel screen), and the uploading features are well done.+ Mode Dial now rotates 360 degrees indefinitely+ Delete - Playback - Navigation buttons can all be used with one hand. Much more convenient button layout overall.+ Zooming in your pictures is a much different task than it used to be, but more fluid overall.+ Top scroll wheel is extremely accurate and fluid+ Very lightweight compared to other full frames

I replaced my eos 50d with the 6d and I am really astonished about the big quality difference of the pictures, especially in low light conditions. The shift from the crop sensor to the full frame sensor is just great.The downside is the HDR modus with which I couldn't shoot good pictures yet, maybe it is also my own stupidness to use the camera correctly, but shooting in HDR doesn't seem to me to be rocket science.It is a great camera for photographers taking pictures in low light conditions and would like to have the benefits from a full frame camera enhancing the picture quality drastically compared to a crop sensor. For sport / fast moving scenes it is not the best choice due to the sole centric af sensor, what I knew before buying the cam and I also do not use the camera for. A plus is also the lower weight compared to the other full frame cameras, which is noticeable when you are out for street photography (excellent in combination with an ef 50mm 1,4). The ef 24-105 kit lens is great and deliver really sharp pictures. For my use: street photography and portraits the lens combination ef 24-105 and ef 50mm turned out to be the best, especially considering the total weight which you have to carry with your equipment and total invest. For snap shots I always carry with me a small compact camera (nikon aw 100) instead of taking out the "big gun".Coming to the customer service from Amazon.com, which - also if many of you think shouldn't be rated here - I want to rate and warn customers with credit cards from Europe:DO NOT USE THE OPTION FROM AMAZON TO PAY IN EUR SINCE AMAZON IS USING AN UNFAVORABLE CONVERSION RATE. I HAD TO PAY 80 EUR MORE THAN IF I WOULD HAVE BEEN PAYING IN $ BEING CHARGED LATER BASED ON THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY CONVERSION RATE.

I have been using Canon Cameras since the 1980's. I also have a part time photography business. This is the latest addition to my line-up (which includes 1V-HS, 20D, 30D, 1D Mark IIn) The 6D is by far the highest quality image I have ever seen from my cameras. An though I have NEVER been displeased with any of the Canon gear that I have had, this camera exceeds my every expectation.The ability to control some functions from an iPhone or iPad and to transfer images directly to a wireless device (including my MacBook) has been especially useful when shooting groups. At a recent family reunion, I was able to be part of the photo, while shooting the group and changing exposure and taking shots remotely.It's sturdy. The controls are intuitive to a photographer that is used to Canon's line-up previously. I wish there were more focusing points, but the pros out way anything that could be considered a con.I looked at the 5D Mark III and chose this model instead for cost, features and size. So far, I am completely satisfied.Highly, highly recommend

Selling my 7D to upgrade to a 6D was a hard decision for me to make (I ponder on this for a couple of months). In part because of the absolute ruggedness of the 7D, but also for some of the photographic features it has (8 fps, 19 cross-type autofocus points, etc.). I felt like I would lose a lot of features just for the full frame sensor.Things I don't like about the 6D:1. Very basic autofocus (I don't understand canon on this, this is a rebel AF in my opinion except for the center point)2. Lack of joystick to move autofocus point3. Button layout. I liked some of the buttons on the left like the 7d or 5DIII.4. Plastic camera top5. Plastic LCD screen cover6. 1/4000 sec max shutter speed7. SD card instead of CFMy style of photography is mostly people and some wide-angle as well. It is obvious that the 7D was designed for sports/wildlife photographers. My only major complain about the 7D is the poor ISO performance typical of APS-C sensor cameras, so I went for it and got the 6D.After a few weeks of using the 6D I think I made the best decision I ever made.Although the 7D focusing system seems superior, in practice I've seen that in my work this makes little to no difference.I can say that the IQ and ISO performance of the 6D is FAR superior to the 7D. Plus the depth of field and reclaiming my wide-angle is something that not a lot of us think it's important until you see it in a full frame camera.The 6D is slightly smaller and lighter than the 7D, but I see this as a good thing.The Wi-Fi is very useful and fun to use.I don't think I'm going to use the HDR and GPS functions, but it's good to know they are there.Fortunately I do have some Canon L glass and I've always regarded these lenses because they produce great pictures, but the combination of L glass and FF sensor is something entirely different and superb.My recommendation is ... if you have a 7D, and are thinking about a 6D and your style of photography fits a full frame camera, go for it! You will be rewarded!

I am an avid photographer and have owned a series of Canon cameras going back to film. Since going digital I really yearned for the ability to take wide angle photos again so I decided to I purchased a full frame digital camera. The 6D seemed like the perfect choice.I love this camera. It takes fantastic pictures. Has all the right features. I particularly like the relatively small size (compared to other full frame cameras).I'd highly recommend this camera for someone needing full frame digital.

There are two reasons this camera doesn't get 5 stars:First the lens, while it is a good lens, not quite as nice as other L series lens, it has an issue with zoom creep. Within about 3 weeks of having the camera I had to send the lens to Canon because the lens creep go so bad it was hard to keep it at the same zoom level while shooting at any angle other than horizontal.Second issue for me is that the shutter/flash sync speed is only 180 which is a bit on the slower side.If I was to buy this camera again I would probably forgo the lens and spend the money saved on a prime lens or two that fit my needs.

There is much to say about this camera. it's incredibly light and easy to use. Best of all, check the Wi-Fi capabilities.I can shoot and control the entire process from my iPhone. Review shots and include them 'instantly' in my iPhone while removing the photos from the camera (saving space immediately). It becomes a hot-spot for your iPhone wherever you are (specially traveling).I will not go into describing the camera features as I am not a professional and tons of articles are available to anyone to see.I used dpreview.com side-by-side comparison before taking my decision and I do not regret it at all.Enjoy this camera and do not think twice as the kit-lense it comes with it's also a great ad-on. I got it for $2,000 USD at the end of the year.

Great image quality for a very reasonable price - this is my light weight, general photography/vacation camera, that paired with a Canon lens EF 50mmm f1.4 USM, covers family events, landscape, and is small in size and lightweight for a good price. I found the camera easy to shoot handheld at relatively low shutter speeds and focuses accurately in low light; when mounted on a tripod for night photography, I found digital noise levels in dark areas of my photos better than other cameras I had owned.

Totally impressed with camera...... For years my main camera was the 7d after purchasing the 6d the full frame is incredible. Recently took 6d to NBA Hall of fame Springfield Mass. With my 24 to 70 I was able to shoot the dome shaped ceiling of inductees 12 pictures in one frame.