Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Body
645 отзывов пользователей o Canon EOS 5D Body
Пользовались
Canon EOS 5D Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
04.04.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Short summary:
* If you shoot a lot of action, 5dMkIII is a better camera (compared to 5dMkII, 7D, Nikon D800). (5 stars).
* If you mainly shoot landscape or still subjects *and* are starting a FF system, I'd strongly suggest checking out Nikon D800. It's $500 cheaper and has better IQ (4 stars).
* If you're a hobbyist getting into FF *and* don't need 1DX-class AF, I'd strongly recommend 5dMkII. It's $1400 cheaper with nearly identical IQ in raw images (3 stars).
* If you already own 5dMkII, don't shoot much action and other MkIII features don't interest you (silent shutter, better build, brighter viewfinder etc), wait until the next generation or a sizable price drop. As is, too pricey (3 stars).
I pre-ordered MkIII when the camera was announced, after seeing Canon's claims that the IQ was improved about 2 stops compared to 5dMkII. Having spent a few days with it, I can say that 5dMkIII is a great camera. The body feels more solid than its predecessor. The new 7D-style viewfinder is brighter. The new AF works wonderfully especially in low light and with the outer focus points. However, I don't see the 2-stop IQ improvement in raw images using Lightroom. At best, the IQ has been improved marginally. Only in-camera JPGs show substantial improvement, which I don't use.
As is, the camera's biggest selling point is AF. I don't think the upgrade from 5dMkII is worth it unless you frequently photograph moving subjects or need 1DX-class AF. Why 3 stars? First off, 5dMkII has pretty similar IQ to 5dMkIII in raw images. However it has an outdated AF unit (a poor design choice by Canon), which is not an obstacle for most people including myself. Second, Nikon D800 sells for $500 less, and it offers as much as MkIII does if not more. Given the more reasonably priced alternatives, and the incremental IQ improvement from much-cheaper 5dMkII, I can only rate this one 3 stars (for people in my position). As a hobbyist who doesn't shoot much action, I think I'll keep my MkII and send this one back.
* If you shoot a lot of action, 5dMkIII is a better camera (compared to 5dMkII, 7D, Nikon D800). (5 stars).
* If you mainly shoot landscape or still subjects *and* are starting a FF system, I'd strongly suggest checking out Nikon D800. It's $500 cheaper and has better IQ (4 stars).
* If you're a hobbyist getting into FF *and* don't need 1DX-class AF, I'd strongly recommend 5dMkII. It's $1400 cheaper with nearly identical IQ in raw images (3 stars).
* If you already own 5dMkII, don't shoot much action and other MkIII features don't interest you (silent shutter, better build, brighter viewfinder etc), wait until the next generation or a sizable price drop. As is, too pricey (3 stars).
I pre-ordered MkIII when the camera was announced, after seeing Canon's claims that the IQ was improved about 2 stops compared to 5dMkII. Having spent a few days with it, I can say that 5dMkIII is a great camera. The body feels more solid than its predecessor. The new 7D-style viewfinder is brighter. The new AF works wonderfully especially in low light and with the outer focus points. However, I don't see the 2-stop IQ improvement in raw images using Lightroom. At best, the IQ has been improved marginally. Only in-camera JPGs show substantial improvement, which I don't use.
As is, the camera's biggest selling point is AF. I don't think the upgrade from 5dMkII is worth it unless you frequently photograph moving subjects or need 1DX-class AF. Why 3 stars? First off, 5dMkII has pretty similar IQ to 5dMkIII in raw images. However it has an outdated AF unit (a poor design choice by Canon), which is not an obstacle for most people including myself. Second, Nikon D800 sells for $500 less, and it offers as much as MkIII does if not more. Given the more reasonably priced alternatives, and the incremental IQ improvement from much-cheaper 5dMkII, I can only rate this one 3 stars (for people in my position). As a hobbyist who doesn't shoot much action, I think I'll keep my MkII and send this one back.
Скроменый эксперт
01.07.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have thousands of dollars worth of Canon glass including almost every "legendary" canon prime like the 200mm f1.8 The mkIII is a great camera and a big improvement over the mkII in autofocus and a full stop better in low light. Nonetheless, having shot with a Nikon D3s and D4 I have to say that nikon still wins on low light sensitivity and especially in autofocus. I know the D4 costs quite a bit more, but if I was starting all over again, I would definitely consider nikon.
Скроменый эксперт
14.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My review is from the perspective of a recreational user...
I'm a long time user of the Canon Powershot cameras. I've always wanted a high-end SLR camera and took the plunge with the 5D Mark III in December. It was a plunge that was long overdue - I love this camera! Picture quality and ease of use are remarkable. Granted, I'm not a professional photographer and new to this camera, so I still have a lot to learn but, wow, what a joy this camera has been so far.
I must say if you are on the fence about purchasing a high-end SLR camera - just do it. There is so much educational information on the web, in e-book form, in books/manuals and in forums that the learning curve is well supported. The creative options with this camera are endless.
The camera/lens make for a large package and it is heavy compared to the Powershot, but then again, well worth the extra weight. I will use my Powershot for backpacking and other times it wouldn't be convent to carry the 5D3, so don't sell you point and shoot camera if you do take the plunge to a nice SLR camera. I think having both cameras is the way to go for a recreational user.
I'm a long time user of the Canon Powershot cameras. I've always wanted a high-end SLR camera and took the plunge with the 5D Mark III in December. It was a plunge that was long overdue - I love this camera! Picture quality and ease of use are remarkable. Granted, I'm not a professional photographer and new to this camera, so I still have a lot to learn but, wow, what a joy this camera has been so far.
I must say if you are on the fence about purchasing a high-end SLR camera - just do it. There is so much educational information on the web, in e-book form, in books/manuals and in forums that the learning curve is well supported. The creative options with this camera are endless.
The camera/lens make for a large package and it is heavy compared to the Powershot, but then again, well worth the extra weight. I will use my Powershot for backpacking and other times it wouldn't be convent to carry the 5D3, so don't sell you point and shoot camera if you do take the plunge to a nice SLR camera. I think having both cameras is the way to go for a recreational user.
Скроменый эксперт
24.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Bought this camera after owning the 7D for the past few years. Main reason was indoor photography without a flash, where this camera really shines. I believe I'm getting a 4 stop improvement over the 7d, which really does make a difference indoors if you want to avoid using a flash. For outdoor photography with good light, I'm not certain that the 5d Mark III has a huge advantage over the 7d, though many would say the 5D is sharper. I haven't done a head to head comparison outdoors however.
Also almost all of the buttons are exactly where they were on the 7D, making the transition very easy. SD card slot is a bonus since I have a bunch of high capacity SD cards lying around, and I haven't noticed the speed disadvantage over CF that people seem to talk about, at least for what I'm doing which is mainly stills and occasional video.
I would highly recommend this camera as an upgrade to the 7D (or any other crop sensor camera) if you are looking to take high quality photos indoors without a flash.
Also almost all of the buttons are exactly where they were on the 7D, making the transition very easy. SD card slot is a bonus since I have a bunch of high capacity SD cards lying around, and I haven't noticed the speed disadvantage over CF that people seem to talk about, at least for what I'm doing which is mainly stills and occasional video.
I would highly recommend this camera as an upgrade to the 7D (or any other crop sensor camera) if you are looking to take high quality photos indoors without a flash.
Скроменый эксперт
03.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
If you're looking to upgrade to something more professional
and have the cash to spend, get the 5d MKIII. best investment
for photographers in 2012. Glad the camera was released in early 2012.
The White Balance, Auto Focus, The Metering are improved tremendously
compared to it's predecessor the 5d MKII.
I own both cameras, MKII & MKIII,
and what blew me away was how well you can capture an image in low light
conditions. In the previous version, MKII, setting your camera to ISO 6400,
your image had tons of grain and was definitely not going to be one of your best
captures from the day. With the MKIII, ISO 6400 is compared to the MKII's ISO3200.
This alone is worth the upgrade, but not the 1k price increase.
The Metering & 61 point AF system is phenomenal. I'm sure you've read tons of reviews
on the upgraded metering/AF system and similarities with the 7d, but this new system
blows away everything from the competition. The White Balance on this camera is beautiful. Exposure
is accurate and have enjoyed shooting weddings, (photography only) in all sort of lighting conditions. 61 point vs 9 point
is a huge step up. This is definitely a plus for wedding photographers or fast action photographers.
I shot a small video using both the MK3 and the MKII and the white balance is
just beautiful. You can view the video here:
[...]
(this was just a test run for video, haven't shot a wedding with the mkIII yet.)
Here's a sample of low light conditions with the mkIII:
[...]
Overall this camera surpasses my expectations and can't wait to shoot more video with this bad *ss camera.
and have the cash to spend, get the 5d MKIII. best investment
for photographers in 2012. Glad the camera was released in early 2012.
The White Balance, Auto Focus, The Metering are improved tremendously
compared to it's predecessor the 5d MKII.
I own both cameras, MKII & MKIII,
and what blew me away was how well you can capture an image in low light
conditions. In the previous version, MKII, setting your camera to ISO 6400,
your image had tons of grain and was definitely not going to be one of your best
captures from the day. With the MKIII, ISO 6400 is compared to the MKII's ISO3200.
This alone is worth the upgrade, but not the 1k price increase.
The Metering & 61 point AF system is phenomenal. I'm sure you've read tons of reviews
on the upgraded metering/AF system and similarities with the 7d, but this new system
blows away everything from the competition. The White Balance on this camera is beautiful. Exposure
is accurate and have enjoyed shooting weddings, (photography only) in all sort of lighting conditions. 61 point vs 9 point
is a huge step up. This is definitely a plus for wedding photographers or fast action photographers.
I shot a small video using both the MK3 and the MKII and the white balance is
just beautiful. You can view the video here:
[...]
(this was just a test run for video, haven't shot a wedding with the mkIII yet.)
Here's a sample of low light conditions with the mkIII:
[...]
Overall this camera surpasses my expectations and can't wait to shoot more video with this bad *ss camera.
Скроменый эксперт
10.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Low light photos are just great with this piece of hardware. Controls are in depth and control every aspect one could need.
Скроменый эксперт
10.08.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been a working photographer for 10 years and I have never loved something so much. The clarity and quality are immaculate. I did a modeling shoot yesterday and I could not believe my eyes. HIGHLY recommend this. **Please note that if you have Photoshop CS4, the RAW files will not work unless you get the Adobe DNG Converter.
Скроменый эксперт
09.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
First, I have to say, in a world where the D800 didn't exist, there would be only praise for this camera. This is a fantastic piece of photographic engineering and anyone who has one in his hands has only himself to blame if he isn't able to create amazing images. But, as it stands, the D800 did steal the Canon's thunder quite a bit. If I had to judge (purely on specs, reviews, and samples for the D800, as I haven't been able to get my hands on one), I'd have to give the win to the Nikon. If you haven't invested in glass, and just want the best value for money full format, the Nikon probably has it by a nose (photo finish - pun intended). However, this camera is superior in low light performance, speed, and video.
If you NEED one to two stops better high iso performance and the 6fps performance gotta go with the Canon. If you NEED the highest resolution and dynamic range, because you plan to make a living making poster size prints and billboards, the Nikon wins handily. Most people would probably get more actual use out of the high iso performance. But the image quality on the D800! From what I've seen, at 100% magnification, the D800 is noticeably superior. When it comes down to it, even if you aren't going to notice the difference in an 8x10 print, you'd KNOW deep down that the D800 had the best IQ if you ever needed to make a billboard out of it. But on the Mark III, you'll get more usable prints in low light, or just catch more moments with the more fps.
My wife bought this camera for herself and has been agonizing whether to jump ship to Nikon. In the end, she decided to stay with Canon. The real life advantages of the Canon versus the slightly superior image quality of the Nikon. Not an easy decision, but not one you can really screw up.
Congratulations to anyone who ends up with either of these fantastic cameras. Now quit arguing online about which camera is better and go out and make art!
P.S. I do miss the pop-up flash from the 7D.
If you NEED one to two stops better high iso performance and the 6fps performance gotta go with the Canon. If you NEED the highest resolution and dynamic range, because you plan to make a living making poster size prints and billboards, the Nikon wins handily. Most people would probably get more actual use out of the high iso performance. But the image quality on the D800! From what I've seen, at 100% magnification, the D800 is noticeably superior. When it comes down to it, even if you aren't going to notice the difference in an 8x10 print, you'd KNOW deep down that the D800 had the best IQ if you ever needed to make a billboard out of it. But on the Mark III, you'll get more usable prints in low light, or just catch more moments with the more fps.
My wife bought this camera for herself and has been agonizing whether to jump ship to Nikon. In the end, she decided to stay with Canon. The real life advantages of the Canon versus the slightly superior image quality of the Nikon. Not an easy decision, but not one you can really screw up.
Congratulations to anyone who ends up with either of these fantastic cameras. Now quit arguing online about which camera is better and go out and make art!
P.S. I do miss the pop-up flash from the 7D.
Скроменый эксперт
09.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had this camera for about six months and I love it! It performs extremely well in very low light, as well as every other situation. It makes great shots right out of the box, and the more I learn about its features, the better my pictures become. If you're coming from a cropped sensor, realize that the EF-S lenses WILL NOT WORK on this body. Be prepared to spend money on high quality glass, but understand that it can take your photography to the next level! If you are serious about photography, the 5D Mark III is a great tool.
Скроменый эксперт
24.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is the best DSLR (not only by Canon) so far, except for the Canon 1D-X. I bought it as a complement to my Canon 7D, but it is quite a different thing altogether. AF and ISO are the two features where this camera especially shines. As a result, IQ is far, far better. I've used this camera with the kit lens 24-105 f/4, with the 70-200 f/2.8, 70-200 f/4, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 and every time its performance has been flawless. I absolutely love the Canon 5D Mark III.
Скроменый эксперт
12.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Does everything extremely well. Best focusing system on the market and best logic for exposure control. Excellent ergonomics. With optional battery grip, balances larger lenses perfectly.
Скроменый эксперт
30.08.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
A big step up from Mark II in almost all aspects: build quality, control, auto focusing, metering, continuous shooting, ISO, dual-card slots, image quality, eye piece... you name it. 90% functionality of the 1DX, half the price.
Скроменый эксперт
24.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have a 5D and a 5D Mark ii. I immediately purchased the Mark iii and don't regret it one bit. The autofocus system alone is worth the additional price, however, I must admit that I consider this camera more of a "Baby" 1D than an upgraded 5D.
LIKES:
1. I can't say enough things about the new autofocus system. AMAZING. GENIUS. I rarely have eyes out of focus now. Even my 85mm/1.2L is performing much better. I love the colors and creaminess from that lense but focusing it was like playing a Russian Roulette game. I am enjoying this lense much more often now with the Mark iii.
2. The low light ISO capabilities are extremely good and more impressive than the Mark ii.
3. I love the lock on the mode dial. I, for one, use to have frequent unsolicited mode changes from Manual to Bulb. No more of that.
4. I love the feel of the rubbery-like finish. The camera feels better in my hand than the Mark ii.
5. LOVE the new dual card slots.
DISLIKES:
My one major gripe is that the autofocus point doesn't highlight in red when I press the focus button (I use back button focus). It only highlights in red when I change the autofocus point. Otherwise, it is a dark grey/black box. I use manual autofocus point selection consistently so I usually do not remember where it was pointing last after a few minutes and it is annoying to have to pretend to change the focus point just to see where it is set. Canon really needs to address this in the next firmware update.
Oh, another thing is that when I shoot a picture, it blocks me from playback of any other photos. I have to actually press the play button if I want to go back and compare that photo to the prior one. The first two 5Ds did not hijack playback like this and it is kind of annoying.
Oh, for all of you on waiting lists (as was I), I went to BestBuy and they had several in stock.
LIKES:
1. I can't say enough things about the new autofocus system. AMAZING. GENIUS. I rarely have eyes out of focus now. Even my 85mm/1.2L is performing much better. I love the colors and creaminess from that lense but focusing it was like playing a Russian Roulette game. I am enjoying this lense much more often now with the Mark iii.
2. The low light ISO capabilities are extremely good and more impressive than the Mark ii.
3. I love the lock on the mode dial. I, for one, use to have frequent unsolicited mode changes from Manual to Bulb. No more of that.
4. I love the feel of the rubbery-like finish. The camera feels better in my hand than the Mark ii.
5. LOVE the new dual card slots.
DISLIKES:
My one major gripe is that the autofocus point doesn't highlight in red when I press the focus button (I use back button focus). It only highlights in red when I change the autofocus point. Otherwise, it is a dark grey/black box. I use manual autofocus point selection consistently so I usually do not remember where it was pointing last after a few minutes and it is annoying to have to pretend to change the focus point just to see where it is set. Canon really needs to address this in the next firmware update.
Oh, another thing is that when I shoot a picture, it blocks me from playback of any other photos. I have to actually press the play button if I want to go back and compare that photo to the prior one. The first two 5Ds did not hijack playback like this and it is kind of annoying.
Oh, for all of you on waiting lists (as was I), I went to BestBuy and they had several in stock.
Скроменый эксперт
04.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
There is nothing that has not been reviewed about this camera here. From very good reviews to the extremely stupid complaints from some people! The camera it's just great!!
It is $300 more that a some sellers on ebay but if you end up having one of those few issues with the packing, camera or lens those ebay sellers are not going to take care of you like Amazon will. For me that is worth the extra $300.
It is $300 more that a some sellers on ebay but if you end up having one of those few issues with the packing, camera or lens those ebay sellers are not going to take care of you like Amazon will. For me that is worth the extra $300.
Скроменый эксперт
04.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
You just don't understand why you waited so long once you shoot your first photo. The light sensitivity is awesome; the colors are bright and true and the camera is rock-solid. Upgrading from a 7d is a huge step up, but controls and software still feel familiar and natural.
Noise is extremely well controlled and definition is terrific. The silent mode is incredible and you really have to concentrate to hear a shot in a normally loud environment.
All in all - ecstatic with my new toy
Noise is extremely well controlled and definition is terrific. The silent mode is incredible and you really have to concentrate to hear a shot in a normally loud environment.
All in all - ecstatic with my new toy
Скроменый эксперт
14.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
this aint a real review it is more of a, this profession uses this. one of my favorite people on instagram jones crow uses this camera, check his acount out
Скроменый эксперт
14.08.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Canon EOS 5D mark ii just got better. I just upgraded to one after much deliberation. the EOS 1D is still the ultimate muse but then, if you are not worried about taking pics of things in fast motion like auto-journalism, the EOS 5D is the best bang for the buck.
Скроменый эксперт
09.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I haven't even open the box and I love it. So I am giving it 5 stars just for that.
Update *** After just a few days of shooting.
I will not review technical or specifications on the camera because those numbers can be read in every single photography website there is. I rather talk about my transition from the t3i to the 5d mark 3.
Coming from a canon t3i this is a big step up.
This camera feels much heavier than my t3i to the point that when I go back to the t3i, it feels more like a very expensive toy.
I always thought that I could get around the full frame factor by taking 3 steps back and shoot but no. There is something I still can't understand about it but it's no just about how much light the sensor will digest. There is something in the composition that just work better. I shot 2 music videos with my t3i and having this much room for low light situations is a MUST. Just when you thought you had a good shot from the cropped sensor camera and you go to editing then you look how bad the dark areas look if you blow up the picture to fill the entire computer screen. NOT ANYMORE with the 5dm3. This is a very clean picture and the small amount of noise in low light actually looks good....a tiny bit like film grain.
It's funny how a simple thing like a headphone output can make a huge impact in videos. Even when the t3i can monitor audio level I was still getting some unwanted sounds that I had to correct in final cut or pro tools. But now that I have the headphone mix I can propperly adjust the gain and capture a better signal from my shot gun mic.
If you have an entree level Dslr like a t2i or t3i and you're still questioning if this upgrade is worth it? Well it is. I started getting paid for my photography and videos and I wish I had the 5dm3 for my last 2 sessions. I'm pretty sure my cllients will appreciate the outpu of this wonderfull instrument.
Update *** After just a few days of shooting.
I will not review technical or specifications on the camera because those numbers can be read in every single photography website there is. I rather talk about my transition from the t3i to the 5d mark 3.
Coming from a canon t3i this is a big step up.
This camera feels much heavier than my t3i to the point that when I go back to the t3i, it feels more like a very expensive toy.
I always thought that I could get around the full frame factor by taking 3 steps back and shoot but no. There is something I still can't understand about it but it's no just about how much light the sensor will digest. There is something in the composition that just work better. I shot 2 music videos with my t3i and having this much room for low light situations is a MUST. Just when you thought you had a good shot from the cropped sensor camera and you go to editing then you look how bad the dark areas look if you blow up the picture to fill the entire computer screen. NOT ANYMORE with the 5dm3. This is a very clean picture and the small amount of noise in low light actually looks good....a tiny bit like film grain.
It's funny how a simple thing like a headphone output can make a huge impact in videos. Even when the t3i can monitor audio level I was still getting some unwanted sounds that I had to correct in final cut or pro tools. But now that I have the headphone mix I can propperly adjust the gain and capture a better signal from my shot gun mic.
If you have an entree level Dslr like a t2i or t3i and you're still questioning if this upgrade is worth it? Well it is. I started getting paid for my photography and videos and I wish I had the 5dm3 for my last 2 sessions. I'm pretty sure my cllients will appreciate the outpu of this wonderfull instrument.
Скроменый эксперт
04.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The 5DMIII feels like and has so far performed like a 1D series! You can read all of the numerous on-line reviews, but I feel like this is a "marked improvement" over the previous generation. Good image quality is a given, but the autofocus, feel, and automation are significantly improved. The original 5D and 5D MII were miles apart, and this newest has left them behind. Clearly for advanced enthusiasts and professionals. This one is sure to make a difference in your passion and work.
Скроменый эксперт
30.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have gradually advanced from a Canon 10D to a Canon 40D and finally made the jump to the 5dmk3. This is a great camera. Low noise performance is awesome. Silent mode, although not silent is much quieter and nice to use at times. There are was more capabilities than most people will ever use.
Скроменый эксперт
12.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It's hard to justify upgrading from a Mark ii, unless you've noticed something that Canon has been steadily improving over the years. Metering. Let me explain…
Digital pics have changed the way we shoot. We look down at our immediately shot pic, to see if we got "it". If the metering worked. Whereas in the past, it either happened or it didn't. It was all about using the meter and understanding the light.
The Mark iii re-captures that feel. The metering is so much better than the Mark ii. I don't find myself constantly compensating.
The metering is my favorite feature, but you'll hear more about the focusing, which is epic. I'm old school, so auto-focusing should be support, not the lead. But it is super fast, with many more cross sensors.
There are a host of other features that simply polishes off all the annoying niggles. And the feel of the camera is so much more substantial.
Video? I haven't tackled that side of the camera yet. As a pure still shooter, I've finally found digital nirvana.
Digital pics have changed the way we shoot. We look down at our immediately shot pic, to see if we got "it". If the metering worked. Whereas in the past, it either happened or it didn't. It was all about using the meter and understanding the light.
The Mark iii re-captures that feel. The metering is so much better than the Mark ii. I don't find myself constantly compensating.
The metering is my favorite feature, but you'll hear more about the focusing, which is epic. I'm old school, so auto-focusing should be support, not the lead. But it is super fast, with many more cross sensors.
There are a host of other features that simply polishes off all the annoying niggles. And the feel of the camera is so much more substantial.
Video? I haven't tackled that side of the camera yet. As a pure still shooter, I've finally found digital nirvana.
Скроменый эксперт
07.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
A truly excellent camera for the professional or advanced amateur, with fast and accurate auto focus facilities producing outstanding prints
Скроменый эксперт
15.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Upgraded from Mark II to this just 2 month ago, and I am very happy with this upgrade even with some extra money I had to shed for Mark III compared to Mark II. Awesome quality, including performance in the dark. Much better focusing in dark conditions - this was one of my biggest complaints about Mark II, my Canon 60D did a much better job at a time. Now this has been addressed in Mark III. Great usability improvements in control panel including live view. 6FPS is awesome to have. Video quality is just amazing. Having two cards is very nice as well. High ISO quality - it is a noticeable improvement over Mark II and 60D, even though they also have an excellent rating in this space. There are many other improvements over Mark II everywhere - you can probably read about on any comparison site - I will not be going into those here. I never used or cared about having an embedded flash in professional camera of this type - if I need to use flash, I use my Canon 430EXII which gives me great results which no embedded flash would ever give. Embedded flash is more of a point-and-shoot camera type feature. I like having HDR feature as it allows me to easily get 3 raw images plus HDR jpg. I do not use resulting jpg, I shoot in RAW all the time anyway, but I post-process those files in Photoshop later for final HDR image. We could get these done before, of course, but it is a nice shortcut that considerable saves time. Definitely a great camera and worth every penny.
Скроменый эксперт
09.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am a serious amateur and debated long and hard between the 5DMKIII and the 6D -In the end I wanted to get a "no compromise" camera. I toyed around with the 6D and it is certainly a fantastic camera (handles well, feels comfortable to hold and creates great images). However, coming from the canon 30D, I felt more at home with control layout on the 5D3. I prefer more controls at my fingers instead of in menus. Secondly, I preferred the autofocus capability of the 5D3. I certainly do not think this warrants the price difference between the two cameras but price was not a limiting factor for me. After 3 weeks of use, this camera meets my expectations. For the price though, I wish it had the WIFI capability of the 6D - I use the EYE-FI PRO cards which works great for me -gives me both wifi and geo tagging functionality.
Overall a great camera - about $500 too expensive, hence the 4 stars instead of 5. I will be keeping this camera for a long time.
Overall a great camera - about $500 too expensive, hence the 4 stars instead of 5. I will be keeping this camera for a long time.
Показаны отзывы 409-432 из 645.
