Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Body
645 отзывов пользователей o Canon EOS 5D Body
Пользовались
Canon EOS 5D Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

It's easy to use even for non-professionals and for those who want to shoot as a hobby.
Be prepared to spend some $$$ on the lenses. The camera only takes EF lenses and not the cheaper EF-S lenses since it's a full frame camera.
This is my first full frame camera since I've upgraded from the 20D, which I purchased 10 years ago.
Canon is well-built and you can feel the difference. No regrets.


This seller had clearly super glued the mirror back on (which you are not supposed to do) and then lied about the description of the camera, detailing as used but in full working condition. This was falsely advertised as it obviously wasn't in full working condition it was just going to work long enough for him to be able to fob it off on someone.
Amazon has been extremely unhelpful in me getting a refund or replacement, purely because I didn't tell the seller it was faulty within two weeks of receiving it. This is clearly a load of rubbish as super glue IS going to hold for longer than two weeks and also it clearly states in their refund and return policy that if the item did not match the description that the seller had described then the customer qualifies for a refund or a return.
I strongly urge on one to buy from this person/company!! And to not fully trust that Amazon are going to follow through on their part of helping you. Terrible customer service!


+ Improved High ISO Performance (Up to 102,400)
+ Faster Focusing System (Similar to 7D)
+ New & Improved Digic 5+ Processor (Dual Core) 14x Faster Than Digic 4
+ Faster Burst Shooting
+ Gains 1 Extra Megapixel from its Predecessor but Nikon D800 is 36MP (Cheaper Than 5D)
- Still No AF Light, Needed for taking Pictures in Dim Light Situations (Nikon Has One)
- No Pop Up Flash! (Nikon Has One)
- Price Increase from it's Predecessor
- Still Slow AF in Live View Mode (Taking Pics with LCD Screen)
- No APSC or DX Mode, Shrinks Your Sensor Size and Gives Your Lens 1.5, 1.6x more Reach (Sony & Nikon has it)
Video:
+ Improved ISO Performance
+ Improved Moire & Aliasing in Video
+ Improved Rolling Shutter
+ Head Phone Jack for Audio Monitoring
+ Can Record Video Up to 29'59 Minute Before Stopping (Because of European Law)
+ Improved Video Bit Rate
+ Added Timecode
- Still Lame Video Codecs, No 1080p at 60fps (Panasonic & Sony Has it)
- No Tele Converter/APSC Crop Mode, Extended your Lens 1.5, 2, 2.9, 3.6x, etc. More (Panasonic & Sony Has it)
- No Full Time Auto Focus for Video (Panasonic & Sony Has it)
- Dynamic Range Still Sucks (Black Magic Cinema Camera has 14 stops, Cheaper Than 5D)
- Video Resolution is Soft (Panasonic & Sony is Much Sharper)
- HDMI Out is Not Clean, Compressed (Not Good for External Recorders)
- No SDI or XLR Inputs (Black Magic Cinema Camera has it)
- Cinema Lens Selection is Limited Due to Mirror Flap, Flange Distance & No Crop Mode for Video (Sony Has it)
- No Vari-Angle or Touch Screen (Sony & Panasonic Has it)
- No Peaking, that help manual focusing (Sony Has It)
I'm Proud that Canon Help Pioneer the Video DSLR Revolution with the 5D Mkii, But After Many Years and Attempts with the 7D, Rebels, 500D, 550D, Etc. They are Only Mild Changes.
New Exciting Affordable Video Cameras are on the Horizon, Panasonic GH3, Black Magic Cinema Camera, Sony NEX 6, A99, FS100, VG900. Canon Better Step Up their Game.
The New Canon 6D is Not the Answer, I'm 99% Sure it's Just a Dumb Down 5D with Wifi & GPS Photo Tagging.
Guess We Will Have to Wait Until Digic 6, Until We Get the Full Frame Canon Video DSLR of Our Dreams

if you're serious about digital photography, this is THE ONE!


I have now taken more than 10,000 shots with my new 5D mk3. I have returned from a trip to Italy where I took about 4000 shots over 11 days. I traveled light and only used two lens (24-105 IS and 70-200 IS),
90% using the 24-105. I did not use a flash, about 70% were inside shots. The low light (many at ISO 12,800) performance was very good to excellent and allowed shots that could not have been taken as flash was not allowed in many inside locations. My outside shots were excellent with outstanding color and sharpness.
This is a great camera!
The July 2012 issue of Popular Photography has reviews of the Canon 5D mk3 and the Nikon D800. The Test Results sections are very interesting.
Keep having fun.
Original Review:
First let me say that I don't appreciate people who write a review on a product that they have not used. I believe that anyone who rates the new 5D MkIII below 4 stars has not properly evaluated this camera. It is excellent and I only have one gripe (I wish it had a simple built-in fill flash as my D700 and 7D have/had).
My last two favorite DSLRs were the Nikon D700 and Canon 7D; both were excellent and worthy of a five star rating when they were introduced. Until now the D700 was my only Full Frame DSLR but I gave it to my nephew (my nephew has become a very good photographer) after I used my 7D for several months. Because of the high cost of lens and other accessories, I have now decided to standardize on Canon. As a side note, I plan to keep my 7D or it's replacement as I like the 1.6 crop factor for telephoto work. The 7D body is less expensive than most good telephoto lens ( I already own the EF 100-400 ).
I received my new 5D MkIII from Amazon on March 26th and have taken about 1200 shots. What I like best about the new 5D is the quality of my pictures. I also enjoy 2 stops + or - higher ISO performance ( vs D700 and 7D ) and at a recent Easter dinner event was able to take all my shoots w/o a flash (95% were taken inside) using f/4 lens (24-105 IS and 70-200 IS). I used Av mode with Auto ISO ( Auto ISO set to Max range ). I try to keep Av at f8 unless I have a depth of field, shutter or ISO issue. The 61 Point AF worked well but I also used single-point Spot AF alot. Auto WB was excellent. Evaluative metering was used as my default but I used Spot metering with certain light issues. I did not record in RAW for this family event. I recorded Large jpegs to my CF card and small jpegs to the SD card. Only a few shots needed a slight adjustment in Photoshop. I absolutely LOVE the Q function when I forget what I am doing ( thanks 7D ).
I have played a little bit with my 50mm f/1.4 len in low light and my pictures are better than "my eyes".
So far all is good and I am having fun.

Shutter speed is fast - good for most occasions. I shoot HS sports and it is fine. Low light sensitivty is great - i get better noise performance at 3200 ISO than the xit at 400. Still learning al the capabilities but so far - really glad I purchased.

I felt the same surge of wonder as when I first used professional lenses. It is a feeling of liberation from technical constraints, an opening to new venues of photography in low light conditions.
Scene photography has never been more exciting now that I truly don't have to bother about calculating the right settings for my flash.
I've been playing around with this new camera for a couple of shoots only, including a new technique for me: video.
All I have to say is that as an amateur photographer, this new Mark III is a game changer and I got exactly what I was looking for.

This is a perfect upgrade for me because of the low light capability, AF, speed, customability, etc. This model corrects and improves on the feature set of the original 5D and the Mark II. So this more of an evolutionary camera not a revolutionalry one like the D800.
In correcting and improving features of the the previous 2 models, canon has created a near perfect camera, but there are some cons that would prevent it from being a 10.0.
Cons:
1. PRICE: This is a big one. Canon decided to increase the price by $500 because they were delivering a near perfect camera. This becomes less palatable because of the release of the D800 and D800e which have a revolutionary sensor at a $500 less price.
2. Disabled feature set:
Metering : Canon deliberately did not include features like the metering of the 1DX unlike the D800 which has the same AF and metering as it's big brother.
HDMI out : Video out quality is not high quality uncompressed unlike the D800
AF linked spot metering : This is a big omission. Canon in it's infinite wisdom reserves this for only it's professional model, while Nikon has it in every model.
UDMA enabled SD slot: the canon implementation is on the slower cards, the D800 has the faster UDMA SD standard.
USB: canon uses the slower 2.0 standard, the D800 has USB 3.0
AF assist light : would have really helped in low light.
3. Sensor technology : There is essentially very little advancement from the Mark II's sensor. The D800's Sony sensor is revolutionary with incredible resolution without paying a penalty for cramming 36 MP in the same size sensor.
I guess canon listened to it's user base on some issues but decided not to reward it's loyal users. This seems to be the direct opposite of what Nikon is doing. While this is disappointing to me as a Canon user for 20+ years, the Mark III camera is the first camera that is close to near perfect in ergonomics and usability. Canon missed a chance to make another legendary T90 type camera that it had done in the past.
So highly recommended with some reservations (see cons). I am definitely going to enjoy this camera.
Kenko High-Spec. LCD Protector for Canon EOS 5D Mark III camera | KLP-CEOS5DM3N




for a better price on amazon buy from this link below
<a href="/gp/product/B00FY3U206/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00FY3U206&linkCode=as2&tag=wallace0b-20">Canon EOS 5D Mark III 22.3 MP Full Frame CMOS Digital SLR Camera with EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS Kit</a><img src="http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=wallace0b-20&l=as2&o=1&a=B00FY3U206" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" >

Since I started using my 5D Mark III, my pictures are in a different ballpark. It's way too simplistic to say that the camera makes the picture ... because a great photographer can take amazing shots with an iPhone ... lighting, framing ... lots more to a shot than the camera.
But I will say that with the 5D in my hands I haven't taken a bad shot. I've done some sessions for friends, and through word of mouth I've gotten inquiries for some paid shoots and have done a few (so I guess I'm borderline past hobbyist).
Also, the low light performance is INSANE. I get clear sharp shots in dimly lit rooms without a flash. Took some family shots in a restaurant for my daughter's birthday, and they're perfect ... even with low lighting.
Love this camera in every way. And the kit lens is really well past what you expect from a kit lens.




I have a Canon 5D Mk II and it's been a real work horse. I love the Canon glass and the photos that the 5D Mk II produces. So when the 5DMk III was announced, I ordered it - even at the steep price of $3,500.00 USD. I like the way Canon delivers their products soon after the announcement - wish Nikon did the same, but I digress. I've been using it now for a couple of weeks. There are several things I like about the newest 5D Gen:
1. The Auto Focus is much faster in actual use. Setting it up is another matter.
2. The locking mode switch is nice - Canon charged me $100.00 to mod my 5DMk II for this feature.
3. There is in- camera correction of chromatic aberration (CA) and vignetting of select lenses . Why Canon didn't install this in the camera out of the box is questionable. You have to load software and manually select the lenses from a list and install them into the camera YOURSELF. While not a problem for most people, with a price tag of $3,500.00 USD, why not spare us that drill? Just saying. There are some older lenses missing from the list too (oh well.)
4. The on-off switch is now on top of the camera instead of at the bottom - this is a big plus for me at least. In my clumsiness I often inadvertently switched the 5DMk II off when pulling it out of the bag.
5. I like the location of the Depth-of-Field (DOF) preview button - now I only need one hand to preview and shoot (thanks Canon!)
6. I haven't done any scientific testing of either camera, but I do see a bit of improvement in the Image Quality in the 5D Mk III, and the low-light images are far better - this is probably due to the re-working of the sensor.
7. This is totally subjective: It just feels better in my hands.
This all adds up to an incrementally better camera than the 5D Mk II. But it's not the "game-changer" that the original 5D was. The 5 D Mk III is not a "revolutionary" model. It's a lovely upgrade from the 5D Mk II, but there's really no compelling reason to ditch your 5D Mk II and switch to the 5 D Mk III. I have the feeling that the Nikon D800 has stolen the thunder of the 5D Mk III, and will cause many people to jump ship - simply because the D800 IS a major game changer and it IS REVOLUTIONARY, while the 5D Mk III just isn't. By the way, I've already ordered my D800 (sorry Canon.)
I have one major complaint with my 5DMk III and that is that I cannot save the Custom 1, 2, 3 features I want. This can probably be fixed in a subsequent firmware update, but it's been a royal pain for me in the meantime. I was able to save one Custom setting, and I have not been able to add C2 and C3. It's just not possible. Hope Canon fixes this soon before I go nuts.



