Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 50D Body
174 отзывов пользователей o Canon EOS 50D Body
Пользовались
Canon EOS 50D Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
18.04.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
After selling my Canon 350D, it was time to buy the Canon 50D. I didn't buy it from Amazon but I just want to write a short review about the product. This camera is well built, strong and comfortable to use. It's easy to use controls and customizable settings, allow the user to have complete control of taking a photograph, whether its beginner or a professional. The lens I got was an 18-135mm and works very well. Moreover, the body of this Canon 50D slightly heavier that the 350D, making it somewhat tiring if your carrying it around all day. The picture quality is somewhat expectional and the LCD is crystal clear with bright colors.
However, one thing I have noticed after using this camera there is a downside. It's the flash. Using the pop-up flash for more than say 60 images, I usually get a busy signal on the display for about 5 to 6 seconds before I can take another shot. I have been told this is a safety measure from Canon and by buying the Canon 580EX II or 430EX flash, will solve this issue. It is annoying when your doing a photoshoot and have to wait before taking a shot. I have the latest firmware too.
Overall, this camera is very good, just wish they'd fix that flash issue.
Andrew
:)
However, one thing I have noticed after using this camera there is a downside. It's the flash. Using the pop-up flash for more than say 60 images, I usually get a busy signal on the display for about 5 to 6 seconds before I can take another shot. I have been told this is a safety measure from Canon and by buying the Canon 580EX II or 430EX flash, will solve this issue. It is annoying when your doing a photoshoot and have to wait before taking a shot. I have the latest firmware too.
Overall, this camera is very good, just wish they'd fix that flash issue.
Andrew
:)
Скроменый эксперт
21.12.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I upgraded from an EOS30D, initially I wanted a 40D, but a deal appeared for this body and just had to get it. I had read many web reviews of all three, a particularly good site for all things Canon is [...]
I am using two lenses; the Canon EF 85m F1.8L USM, and the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 Previous reviewers have comprehensively been through the good and bad points of this camera, I would just reiterate that you must use high quality glass - L series lenses or similar otherwise the 15Mb sensor is wasted, in fact it will probably deliver less sharp, and noisier pictures - in other words a big disappointment!
The other point to note is that it is much more senstitive to camera shake: I took some shots today of the snow, and even at 1/200s at "only" 30-40mm focal length I was getting slight blur when viewed at 100%, so beware! Landscapes require mandatory use of a tripod if you want a decent sharp image, unless its very bright. Personally I don't want to simply increase the ISO speed, as this adds more noise (more so than a 40D). The Tamron lens I got brand new today, and for a while thought I had got a "duffer" - one that needed serious re-calibration. However, I have taken some tripod mounted shots indoors, and even ambient lighting at a shutter speed of up to 4s the results are staggering. I can see details on the plastic Christmas tree leaves that are difficult enough to see when looking close up with the naked
eye!
In summary, unless you are going to use good lenses, then the additional cost over a 40D might not be worth the investment...Fuji Velvia was so much simpler (and nicer to look at)!!
I am using two lenses; the Canon EF 85m F1.8L USM, and the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 Previous reviewers have comprehensively been through the good and bad points of this camera, I would just reiterate that you must use high quality glass - L series lenses or similar otherwise the 15Mb sensor is wasted, in fact it will probably deliver less sharp, and noisier pictures - in other words a big disappointment!
The other point to note is that it is much more senstitive to camera shake: I took some shots today of the snow, and even at 1/200s at "only" 30-40mm focal length I was getting slight blur when viewed at 100%, so beware! Landscapes require mandatory use of a tripod if you want a decent sharp image, unless its very bright. Personally I don't want to simply increase the ISO speed, as this adds more noise (more so than a 40D). The Tamron lens I got brand new today, and for a while thought I had got a "duffer" - one that needed serious re-calibration. However, I have taken some tripod mounted shots indoors, and even ambient lighting at a shutter speed of up to 4s the results are staggering. I can see details on the plastic Christmas tree leaves that are difficult enough to see when looking close up with the naked
eye!
In summary, unless you are going to use good lenses, then the additional cost over a 40D might not be worth the investment...Fuji Velvia was so much simpler (and nicer to look at)!!
Скроменый эксперт
07.04.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
A lot has been said about this camera with many people seeing it (and the 5dMk2) as a return to form for Canon, and to be fair it is a great camera. I owned the 20D for several years and owners of the 20/30/40D models will be pleased to know that the ergonimics of the body are virtually the same to previous bodys if not (in the case of the 40D) identicle. It fits very nicely into the hand, for those who have larger hands it isn`t as small and therefore awkward to use as the 400/450D nor is it as heavy as the 1D series of camera. All buttons are well placed with AF point selection, ISO, AF mode etc all within easy reach of the index finger or thumb when using the camera.
The LCD is a nice improvement over the cameras I have used, with the 920 000 pixels on the 3" screen giving a great amount of detail for when you wan`t to check your images out (though if you had a laptop with you when shooting I would still recomend using that to check your focus and exposure). Interestingly for me the LCD is also viewable in harsh sunlight something my previous cameras weren`t.......no matter what angle I put the cameras it was virtually immpossible to see the image....not so with this LCD.
Image quality form the camera is good, with 15mp there is a lot of detail caught, but to be honest I do wonder at the wisdom of putting high amounts of pixels on an APS-C sensor......sure it looks good in the specs 15.1mp but the reality is (IMO) that you don`t really need more than 13mp on a sensor of this size. With cramming that many pixels on a sensor you are just creating a situation where the individual pixels being so close together are affecting their neighbouring pixels with electrical noise thereby increasing the amount of noise....yes the noise reduction in the camera is fantastic......but with less pixels and therefore more space between them on the sensor there will be a smaller degree of each pixel affecting the other meaning less background noise. This seems to be what Nikon has done with the D300, Canon could have equalled if not bettered the noise control of the D300 if they had kept the Mp count down.
Still i`m being slightly unfair the camera is fantastic and I would recomend it to anyone looking at upgrading or looking for a second body as back up, the images produced are great, and the noise very well controlled.....but it could have been better (hence 4 stars).
The LCD is a nice improvement over the cameras I have used, with the 920 000 pixels on the 3" screen giving a great amount of detail for when you wan`t to check your images out (though if you had a laptop with you when shooting I would still recomend using that to check your focus and exposure). Interestingly for me the LCD is also viewable in harsh sunlight something my previous cameras weren`t.......no matter what angle I put the cameras it was virtually immpossible to see the image....not so with this LCD.
Image quality form the camera is good, with 15mp there is a lot of detail caught, but to be honest I do wonder at the wisdom of putting high amounts of pixels on an APS-C sensor......sure it looks good in the specs 15.1mp but the reality is (IMO) that you don`t really need more than 13mp on a sensor of this size. With cramming that many pixels on a sensor you are just creating a situation where the individual pixels being so close together are affecting their neighbouring pixels with electrical noise thereby increasing the amount of noise....yes the noise reduction in the camera is fantastic......but with less pixels and therefore more space between them on the sensor there will be a smaller degree of each pixel affecting the other meaning less background noise. This seems to be what Nikon has done with the D300, Canon could have equalled if not bettered the noise control of the D300 if they had kept the Mp count down.
Still i`m being slightly unfair the camera is fantastic and I would recomend it to anyone looking at upgrading or looking for a second body as back up, the images produced are great, and the noise very well controlled.....but it could have been better (hence 4 stars).
Скроменый эксперт
09.09.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
That's a good solid camera, which performs very well. But I'e expectd more improvements in picture quality in compare to 400d which i had before. I've spend lot of time reading forums, trying to udestand what's is really wrong - camera or my expecations and here are some results:
1. Do not expect big difference in image quality in tests (that's not real live images) in compare with 400d. It will be slighlty more detailed, but sometimes have even more noise than you had before. The basic explanation is that 15mpx is too much for current technologies & that sensor size, you will not have all of them. If you what to have big difference you'll have to buy full frame camera with bigger sensor.
3. Camera (it looks it's tha same for the whole x0d family) have some known issues with mageta color. Can be easily fixed with moving by 2 steps to green in camer settigns.
2. It's much better build and better handled. But I do not like On/Off switch, suppose, that's just a matter of habit.
3. Sensor is more sensitive - with the same conditions you will have less exposure, which will make images much better and gives you more flexability.
4. It's very fast. Again better images. Startup time is amazing and fast shoot mode is more than just fast, it's rapido :)
5. Very good screen.
Also, be prepared that you will have to get use to it's raw files. CS3 (and many others) process these files with noticable difference in compare to 400d.
So, the main idea is that it's good for upgrade from 400d level and you will notice difference in results (probably after couple of fights with camera :) ) But I wouldn't do that if I would have 40d. From 40d next level is definetely 5dmk2 and upgrade to 50d wouldn't be good value for money.
1. Do not expect big difference in image quality in tests (that's not real live images) in compare with 400d. It will be slighlty more detailed, but sometimes have even more noise than you had before. The basic explanation is that 15mpx is too much for current technologies & that sensor size, you will not have all of them. If you what to have big difference you'll have to buy full frame camera with bigger sensor.
3. Camera (it looks it's tha same for the whole x0d family) have some known issues with mageta color. Can be easily fixed with moving by 2 steps to green in camer settigns.
2. It's much better build and better handled. But I do not like On/Off switch, suppose, that's just a matter of habit.
3. Sensor is more sensitive - with the same conditions you will have less exposure, which will make images much better and gives you more flexability.
4. It's very fast. Again better images. Startup time is amazing and fast shoot mode is more than just fast, it's rapido :)
5. Very good screen.
Also, be prepared that you will have to get use to it's raw files. CS3 (and many others) process these files with noticable difference in compare to 400d.
So, the main idea is that it's good for upgrade from 400d level and you will notice difference in results (probably after couple of fights with camera :) ) But I wouldn't do that if I would have 40d. From 40d next level is definetely 5dmk2 and upgrade to 50d wouldn't be good value for money.
Скроменый эксперт
15.09.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have previously owned a 400D and 40D and can say the 50D is superior in every way. Using it with a 200mm F2.8 L lens it is bitingly sharp, the sensor really shows what it can do with quality lenses ( L series ) and is incredibly detailed. So far I have not even needed the micro focus adjust capability. It has everything an enthusiastic photographer needs as long as you dont have a requirement for video...this is the current bargain in the Canon range in my opinion. Buy it while you can !
Скроменый эксперт
16.12.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have always owned Canon DSLR'S and the 50D is my latest. In short, this camera is superb. Its lightning fast in every way, solid build quality adds to the professional feel, and noise at high iso is great. The only thing about this camera is that it is rather unforgiving, what I mean is in order to get the cleanest images and make use of the high iso, your exposure needs to be spot on, if you under expose then noise WILL become apparent, but get it right, and the image will be superb. I find that mine, when coupled with my Tamron lenses, tends to under expose by about 1stop in low light conditions (indoors etc) but dial in +1ec and all is great! The other thing to watch is due to the higher resolution sensor, it tends to exaggerate camera shake a little more too so you need to watch your shutter speed. This camera is, I think, for the more confident shooter, like I said, it is an unforgiving camera but get it right and it is superb! It also likes to be coupled with higher grade lenses, you will not get the best out of this camera using the kit lens (still get good images but) as the higher resolution will show any lens weakness a lot more than a lower res sensor. In short, this camera, to get the best, it demands the best. It is a superb semi pro tool that is more than capable of getting the job done.
Скроменый эксперт
03.05.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am on my second 50D body, the first just would not focus correctly even using L lenses, on searching the net this seems more common than it should be. I sent it to Canon for checks and they said the 3D focus had to be adjusted. When it was returned the focus was spot on but the camera would not go into sleep mode. Amazon came to the rescue and arranged for a new replacement.
The image quality is not far behind my 7D but it does not have the advanced focus and other bells and whistles of the 7D. For the price with the current cash back promotion it is a great camera at a competitive price.
Buy from Amazon because if you do have problems then they will look after you!
The image quality is not far behind my 7D but it does not have the advanced focus and other bells and whistles of the 7D. For the price with the current cash back promotion it is a great camera at a competitive price.
Buy from Amazon because if you do have problems then they will look after you!
Скроменый эксперт
20.07.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great Camera a good upgrade if you have a 30D Despite the negative reviews on the net over the high ISO performance this is a good camera better build than the 550D Do really need video on a camera? if the answer is no then this is good choice. Rumours abound that the 60D is due if it is this will become a good buy in its own right
Скроменый эксперт
17.04.2010
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this as a replacement/upgrade for an EOS 400D. I was immediately disappointed with the picture quality, and sent it back to Amazon within a matter of days. Most of the pictures were soft to the point of being blurry. The picture quality was worse than my older consumer level DSLR. Pictures in low light conditions were particularly bad. The only decent shots I took were from a tripod.
I have since upgraded to an EOS 7D and the quality is like chalk and cheese (but I suppose it should be for the price).
I have since upgraded to an EOS 7D and the quality is like chalk and cheese (but I suppose it should be for the price).
Скроменый эксперт
04.03.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been the happy owner of a 400D for the last 2 years (roughly) and I have learnt a lot from this happy little camera. I always regretted not saving a little more and buying the 30D. I waited and waited and had the money sitting for the updated 40D, but never got around to buying one. I didnt see the point in buying a 40D with 10MP and having a 400D with 10MP. Then this beauty came out, albeit a while ago....
Quite honestly the difference is amazing between the 400D and the 50D. It feels better, it feels realer if you can imagine that. The picture quality is above greatness. It will never be as good as that lovely 5D mk II but this camera can hold its own as a semi pro SLR I reckon. It's so easy to pick up and use. It's fast. (So far) It's reliable. I am trying to think of a problem I have had with it thus far and cannot think of any.
The only bad side, if you can call it one, is the battery life is shocking when you use the live view, but I don't use it that much so it's not a worry for me. The Live View is well cool though, you can compose your image and see the difference straight away when using Manual. Which cuts down on testing shots etc.
If you have the money and you own and older Canon and have a few lenses and compact flash cards, you wont find better than this camera. You will not regret it one minute!
If you don't have any lenses I can vouch for the 17-85mm IS USM Lens as being a pretty decent lens, it's not L quality but it's fine as a carry-all-day lens for many different uses.
So, what's the delay?? Buy a Canon today!! :)
Good Luck
Quite honestly the difference is amazing between the 400D and the 50D. It feels better, it feels realer if you can imagine that. The picture quality is above greatness. It will never be as good as that lovely 5D mk II but this camera can hold its own as a semi pro SLR I reckon. It's so easy to pick up and use. It's fast. (So far) It's reliable. I am trying to think of a problem I have had with it thus far and cannot think of any.
The only bad side, if you can call it one, is the battery life is shocking when you use the live view, but I don't use it that much so it's not a worry for me. The Live View is well cool though, you can compose your image and see the difference straight away when using Manual. Which cuts down on testing shots etc.
If you have the money and you own and older Canon and have a few lenses and compact flash cards, you wont find better than this camera. You will not regret it one minute!
If you don't have any lenses I can vouch for the 17-85mm IS USM Lens as being a pretty decent lens, it's not L quality but it's fine as a carry-all-day lens for many different uses.
So, what's the delay?? Buy a Canon today!! :)
Good Luck
Скроменый эксперт
10.08.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
In the past I used a compact camera and as most users will know there are certain limitations to it (shutter speed, lens qualilty...etc). Next I bought a Canon G7 and I was satisfied with it for day to day photography. Somehow I didn't find this enough and I went looking for a SLR camera. I had to choose between the 50D and the 5D. What made me choose the 50D? Someone told me that I should use my money on a good lens instead of a basic lens with a great camera. OK, I don't have full frame but for now that's not my main concern as this is a camera that I will use to 'explore' the exciting world of photography.
What do I find so great about it? working speed, the buttons are on the right place, the 'feel' of the body and a more than decent resolution. Also the possibility to shoot very fast (about 6 frames a second) is great for sport events.
I bought along with the body a 24-70 L USM lens; a very, very good lens.
What do I find so great about it? working speed, the buttons are on the right place, the 'feel' of the body and a more than decent resolution. Also the possibility to shoot very fast (about 6 frames a second) is great for sport events.
I bought along with the body a 24-70 L USM lens; a very, very good lens.
Скроменый эксперт
02.06.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I wont tire you with technical details, you can read them above.
I will mention that digic 14bit, does make a difference from 12bit, nice tecture and smooth gradients (i upgraded from 20d), and that this camera is much faster than her previous models. Solid and quility built.
Strongest points are the LCD screen, almost as good as a computers screen, you can check focus properly, menus, and of course A/F micro-adjustment. 15mp are also a plus.
Cons, are that there is not much improvement in noise performance (however it is not worse than 40d that some people have argued), and that it is memory hungry (you would expect that).
I will mention that digic 14bit, does make a difference from 12bit, nice tecture and smooth gradients (i upgraded from 20d), and that this camera is much faster than her previous models. Solid and quility built.
Strongest points are the LCD screen, almost as good as a computers screen, you can check focus properly, menus, and of course A/F micro-adjustment. 15mp are also a plus.
Cons, are that there is not much improvement in noise performance (however it is not worse than 40d that some people have argued), and that it is memory hungry (you would expect that).
Скроменый эксперт
08.02.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have had this camera for a few weeks and now and have one slightly negative thing and that is with 17-200mm IS lens the whole combo is quite heavy. But even that has a positive side because it just feels so positive and well "anchored" in your hands. The build quality is absolutely top drawer.
In use it is an absolute dream to use and because it has such high resolution you can really crop your pictures right down and still get excellent results. It's performance in low light is also stunning, in fact quite unbelievable as the pictures I took late yesterday afternoon in Borough Market bear evidence to.
The speed of this camera is also another big feature.
I could go on forever but I won't just go out and buy one, you won't regret it.
In use it is an absolute dream to use and because it has such high resolution you can really crop your pictures right down and still get excellent results. It's performance in low light is also stunning, in fact quite unbelievable as the pictures I took late yesterday afternoon in Borough Market bear evidence to.
The speed of this camera is also another big feature.
I could go on forever but I won't just go out and buy one, you won't regret it.
Скроменый эксперт
02.10.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I upgraded from a EOS 30D and this is a wonderful improvement. I realize that 40D owners might not have the same experience.
The auto focus works very well in very bad light (for a camera that is). And it also works a lot better than the 30D on moving subjects as well.
The display at the back is significantly better than the 30D display. Some claim that it is the first good display on any Canon SLR.
It is possible to turn off focus hunting. That is good for bird photographers with long lenses. I've yet to try it, but I plan to.
The auto ISO feature works very well for me. I'm very pleased with it.
The new menu system makes it very easy to configure the camera.
Live view is nice to have since I get a feel of how the picture will look. e.g. whether it will be underexposed or overexposed. In most cases, it will be easier to just take the picture and examine it on the display.
I've had the camera for two weeks and so far it has been fun. No letdowns.
The auto focus works very well in very bad light (for a camera that is). And it also works a lot better than the 30D on moving subjects as well.
The display at the back is significantly better than the 30D display. Some claim that it is the first good display on any Canon SLR.
It is possible to turn off focus hunting. That is good for bird photographers with long lenses. I've yet to try it, but I plan to.
The auto ISO feature works very well for me. I'm very pleased with it.
The new menu system makes it very easy to configure the camera.
Live view is nice to have since I get a feel of how the picture will look. e.g. whether it will be underexposed or overexposed. In most cases, it will be easier to just take the picture and examine it on the display.
I've had the camera for two weeks and so far it has been fun. No letdowns.
Скроменый эксперт
27.05.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have purchased the Canon 50D 2 weeks ago and I am very happy with it. Great spot metering and good handling.
Скроменый эксперт
22.10.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Decided to upgrade my wonderful eod400d and lenses. After reading quite a lot about it, I had decided against the 450d and would go for the 40d instead. However, after reading about this camera, I could not resist..... it was quite a lot more, but decided that I could buy this one and not need another camera for many years. If you do not already have good lenses, the starter kit with the 17-85 USM IS lens, good value combination. Only disadvantages compared to a lesser lens and the 400d is the size and weight, however feels much more stable and well built. Now down the the picture quality...... all I can say is AMAZING! Even in low light (a common eos flaw) this camera took great shots without the flash, crystal clear..... only had it a day or so, but convinced this was well worth every penny
Скроменый эксперт
16.10.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Canon EOS 50D Digital SLR Camera - Body OnlyI have owned this camera for 3 weeks and it has been a real pleasure.The images are superb in all settings and having the high ISO settings allows me to almost shoot in the dark.The display on the back of the camera is really sharp and the menu features are easy to use.The auto focus is really fast and spot on all the time. The camera feels well balanced and comfortable to handle.I would recommend it to anyone.
Скроменый эксперт
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
(UPDATE: 07.01.2015, bitte für das Update ans Ende scrollen - danke!)
Da ich vor einiger Zeit zwei gebrauchte Analogkameras und diverse Objektive - darunter zwei mit M42-Schraubverschluss - erworben habe, erschien es mir eine durchaus lohnenswerte Investition einen Adapter anzuschaffen mit welchem ich diese Objektive auch an meiner Canon EOS 1100D verwenden konnte.
Ursprünglich ging es mir hauptsächlich darum, ein Tele-Reflexagar 300mm (ggfs. sogar mit 2x Telekonverter) anschließen zu können; dies funktioniert auch mehr oder weniger problemlos. Dabei ist allerdings anzumerken, dass durch die Schraubvorgänge am Gewinde dermaßen viel Metallstaub entsteht, dass man aufpassen sollte, dass dieser nicht an das hintere Objektivende oder - schlimmer noch - in das Kamerainnere gelangt.
Als ich den Adapter mit einem russischen KMZ Helios 44-2 (58mm f2.0) verwenden wollte, musste ich entsetzt feststellen, dass sich das Objektiv nicht problemlos befestigen lässt - es dreht schlichtweg über! Da sich das Objektiv selbst sowohl am Telekonverter als auch an einer Zenit-E einwandfrei und präzise festschrauben lässt (da wackelt nichts!), liegt das Problem eindeutig im Adapter.
Zusätzlich möchte ich außerdem anmerken, dass der Adapter, der mir geliefert wurde, dem abgebildeten überhaupt nicht entspricht - statt der "Qualitätsware aus verchromtem Messing" erhielt ich ein schwarzes Modell, vermutlich aus eloxiertem Aluminium (auch hier auf Amazon.de zu finden, z.B. von proxistar). Ob und inwiefern dies einen Unterschied in der Verwendbarkeit ausmacht, kann ich leider nicht sagen, aber so wie es ist, scheint es reine Glückssache zu sein, welche M42-Objektive passen und welche überdrehen - schade!
*****************
UPDATE 07.01.2015
*****************
Nachdem ich mir aufgrund des zuvor beschriebenen Problems mit dem Helios 44-2 von einem anderen Anbieter einen weiteren M42-EOS-Adapter gekauft habe (der, interessanterweise, der Beschreibung für diesen Artikel auf Amazon sehr genau zu entsprechen scheint), hatte ich Gelegenheit den alten Adapter mit weiteren Objektiven zu testen. So scheint tatsächlich nur das Helios überzudrehen; ein RMC Tokina 28mm 1:2.8 zum Beispiel passt perfekt, ebenso das zuvor von mir beschriebene Tele-Reflexagar 300mm. Daher habe ich die Bewertung nachträglich um einen Stern erhöht. Die 2 Punkte Abzug für den nicht der Beschreibung entsprechenden Artikel bleiben jedoch bestehen!
Da ich vor einiger Zeit zwei gebrauchte Analogkameras und diverse Objektive - darunter zwei mit M42-Schraubverschluss - erworben habe, erschien es mir eine durchaus lohnenswerte Investition einen Adapter anzuschaffen mit welchem ich diese Objektive auch an meiner Canon EOS 1100D verwenden konnte.
Ursprünglich ging es mir hauptsächlich darum, ein Tele-Reflexagar 300mm (ggfs. sogar mit 2x Telekonverter) anschließen zu können; dies funktioniert auch mehr oder weniger problemlos. Dabei ist allerdings anzumerken, dass durch die Schraubvorgänge am Gewinde dermaßen viel Metallstaub entsteht, dass man aufpassen sollte, dass dieser nicht an das hintere Objektivende oder - schlimmer noch - in das Kamerainnere gelangt.
Als ich den Adapter mit einem russischen KMZ Helios 44-2 (58mm f2.0) verwenden wollte, musste ich entsetzt feststellen, dass sich das Objektiv nicht problemlos befestigen lässt - es dreht schlichtweg über! Da sich das Objektiv selbst sowohl am Telekonverter als auch an einer Zenit-E einwandfrei und präzise festschrauben lässt (da wackelt nichts!), liegt das Problem eindeutig im Adapter.
Zusätzlich möchte ich außerdem anmerken, dass der Adapter, der mir geliefert wurde, dem abgebildeten überhaupt nicht entspricht - statt der "Qualitätsware aus verchromtem Messing" erhielt ich ein schwarzes Modell, vermutlich aus eloxiertem Aluminium (auch hier auf Amazon.de zu finden, z.B. von proxistar). Ob und inwiefern dies einen Unterschied in der Verwendbarkeit ausmacht, kann ich leider nicht sagen, aber so wie es ist, scheint es reine Glückssache zu sein, welche M42-Objektive passen und welche überdrehen - schade!
*****************
UPDATE 07.01.2015
*****************
Nachdem ich mir aufgrund des zuvor beschriebenen Problems mit dem Helios 44-2 von einem anderen Anbieter einen weiteren M42-EOS-Adapter gekauft habe (der, interessanterweise, der Beschreibung für diesen Artikel auf Amazon sehr genau zu entsprechen scheint), hatte ich Gelegenheit den alten Adapter mit weiteren Objektiven zu testen. So scheint tatsächlich nur das Helios überzudrehen; ein RMC Tokina 28mm 1:2.8 zum Beispiel passt perfekt, ebenso das zuvor von mir beschriebene Tele-Reflexagar 300mm. Daher habe ich die Bewertung nachträglich um einen Stern erhöht. Die 2 Punkte Abzug für den nicht der Beschreibung entsprechenden Artikel bleiben jedoch bestehen!
Скроменый эксперт
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Zuerst möchte ich sagen, dass die Verarbeitung des Adapters einwandfrei ist, keinerlei scharfe Kanten und kein Wackeln. Sehr solide!
Die Einstellung der Objektive auf Unendlich bleibt vollständig erhalten.
Der einzige negative Punkt:
Besitzt man eine EOS 1D Mark II, steht man vor dem Problem, dass die Kamera mit dem Adapter beim Auslösen den Spiegel hochklappt, jedoch kein Bild aufnimmt (Verschluss bleibt geschlossen) und auf dem oberen Display nur "Err 01" anzeigt.
Dies wird dadurch ausgelöst, dass der Adapter im Bajonett einen Schalter betätigt, der nur bei den Canon 1er Modellen existiert (dort so weit ich weiß auch nur bei der Mark II und der Mark IIN) und dafür sorgen soll, dass die Kamera ein angesetztes EF-Objektiv erwartet, das ihr Daten liefert. Da dieser Adapter aber keinen Chip besitzt, empfängt die Kamera keine Daten und zeigt den genannten Error an.
Die Lösung des Problems besteht darin ein paar Millimeter von einem der drei herausstehenden Teile des EF-Anschlusses des Adapters (der gegenüber des roten Punkts) abzufeilen, damit der Schalter im Bajonett der Kamera nicht betätigt wird. Anleitungen dazu existieren im Internet.
Die Kamera erwartet nun keine Objektivdaten mehr und löst ohne Probleme aus. Der Adapter bleibt nach der Anpassung kompatibel zu anderen EOS Kameras.
Eine andere Alternative wäre die Anschaffung eines Adapters mit Chip und AF Confirm, der aber oftmals entsprechend teuerer ist, als der hier angebotene.
Das Problem ist eigentlich nur erwähnenswert, weil der Adapter explizit als kompatibel zur 1D Mark II gekennzeichnet ist. Das Problem tritt sonst an keiner anderen Kamera auf.
Die Einstellung der Objektive auf Unendlich bleibt vollständig erhalten.
Der einzige negative Punkt:
Besitzt man eine EOS 1D Mark II, steht man vor dem Problem, dass die Kamera mit dem Adapter beim Auslösen den Spiegel hochklappt, jedoch kein Bild aufnimmt (Verschluss bleibt geschlossen) und auf dem oberen Display nur "Err 01" anzeigt.
Dies wird dadurch ausgelöst, dass der Adapter im Bajonett einen Schalter betätigt, der nur bei den Canon 1er Modellen existiert (dort so weit ich weiß auch nur bei der Mark II und der Mark IIN) und dafür sorgen soll, dass die Kamera ein angesetztes EF-Objektiv erwartet, das ihr Daten liefert. Da dieser Adapter aber keinen Chip besitzt, empfängt die Kamera keine Daten und zeigt den genannten Error an.
Die Lösung des Problems besteht darin ein paar Millimeter von einem der drei herausstehenden Teile des EF-Anschlusses des Adapters (der gegenüber des roten Punkts) abzufeilen, damit der Schalter im Bajonett der Kamera nicht betätigt wird. Anleitungen dazu existieren im Internet.
Die Kamera erwartet nun keine Objektivdaten mehr und löst ohne Probleme aus. Der Adapter bleibt nach der Anpassung kompatibel zu anderen EOS Kameras.
Eine andere Alternative wäre die Anschaffung eines Adapters mit Chip und AF Confirm, der aber oftmals entsprechend teuerer ist, als der hier angebotene.
Das Problem ist eigentlich nur erwähnenswert, weil der Adapter explizit als kompatibel zur 1D Mark II gekennzeichnet ist. Das Problem tritt sonst an keiner anderen Kamera auf.
Скроменый эксперт
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Mir hatte ein "Fachmann" gesagt, es würde keinen Spaß machen mit analogen Objektiven an digitalen Kameras zu arbeiten. Blödmann, und ob das Spaß macht. Man fühlt sich wieder in die Zeit zurückversetzt in der man ein Foto machte und darauf wartete was in der Dunkelkammer da dann rauskam. Mit dem Monitor an modernen Kameras ist das zwar in Sekunden geschehen, aber man muß vorher Blende und Zeit manuell bestimmen, was mich an meine Anfänge der Fotografie erinnnert (Opas Akarette, 50mm, keine Spiegelreflex. Entfernung, Zeit und Blende mußte man fühlen) So kompliziert ist es nicht und man kann eine Menge Geld sparen. Einzig der fehlende Bildstabilisator ist etwas schwierig, aber dafür gibt es ja Stative. Wenn man diesen recht preiswerten Adapterring hat, kann man die guten alten Objektive noch nutzen. Da meine alle sehr lichtstark sind, ist es für mich ein großer Gewinn für kleines Geld. Passt aber auch nur wirklich gut an Originalobjektive und nicht gut an Fremdfabrikate.
Скроменый эксперт
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Der Adapter lies sich nicht in meine Kamera einsetzen, schuld daran ist die vermutlich falsch positionierte Stoppschraube, nach dem entfernen der Schraube lies er sich dann verwenden. Die gesamte Verarbeitung lässt sehr zu wünschen übrig, da der Adapter sehr scharfkantig ist, immer wenn ich das Teil anfasse hab ich angst das ich mich gleich schneiden werde. Außerdem hält der Objektiv-Rückdeckel nicht an dem Teil, also muss der Adapter, nach dem Benutzen, entweder immer abgeschraubt werden oder man träg sein Objektiv ungeschützt mit sich rum. Einzig das M42-Gewinde ist vernünftig geschnitten, zumiendest lässt er sich sauber auf meine Objektive aufschrauben. Da sich der Adapter, trotz seiner Mängel, verwenden lässt und wenigsten das Gewinde ohne Probleme funnktioniert gebe ich ihm 2 Sterne, rate aber trotzdem vom kauf ab. Zum Glück gibt es genug Alternativen, da ist mit Sicherheit was besseres dabei.
Скроменый эксперт
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Habe schon mehrere Adapterringe für M42 Objektive auf verschiedene Fabrikate bestellt, doch bisher keinen dieser Qualität!
Bereits beim Auspacken war ich vom Gewicht des Rings positiv überrascht, ein eindeutiges Plus und keineswegs als selbstverständlich anzusehen, gerade in dieser Preisklasse.
Der Adapter ist allgemein wirklich hochwertig verarbeitet, keine scharfen Kanten, kein Hängen oder Schleifen beim Einrasten, alles sehr sauber und bündig.
Ebenso kein Wackeln, das Objektiv sitzt optimal.
Ich kann den Artikel wirklich jedem empfehlen der seine alten Schätze an einer Canon DSLR verwenden möchte. Preis-/Leistung ist hervorragend!
Bereits beim Auspacken war ich vom Gewicht des Rings positiv überrascht, ein eindeutiges Plus und keineswegs als selbstverständlich anzusehen, gerade in dieser Preisklasse.
Der Adapter ist allgemein wirklich hochwertig verarbeitet, keine scharfen Kanten, kein Hängen oder Schleifen beim Einrasten, alles sehr sauber und bündig.
Ebenso kein Wackeln, das Objektiv sitzt optimal.
Ich kann den Artikel wirklich jedem empfehlen der seine alten Schätze an einer Canon DSLR verwenden möchte. Preis-/Leistung ist hervorragend!
Скроменый эксперт
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Viel kann ich zu diesem Adapterring nicht sagen. Auffallend positiv stach mir sofort die wirklich perfekte verarbeitung ins Auge. Das Teil ist einfach aus massivem Metall und sitzt an meiner 70D perfekt und rastet auch richtig ein. Allerdings hätte ich mich über einen Chip an dem Adapter gewünscht, damit die Kamera auch anzeigt, wann ein objekt scharf ist. Diese gibt es auch von der Konkurenz...ich habe es aber vor dem Kauf nicht gewusst. Ich behalte diesen Adapter trotzdem, da ich bisher damit super zufrieden bin. Mein m42 objektiv funktioniert damit auch einwandfrei.
Скроменый эксперт
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Ich kann mich nicht über den Adapter beschweren, habe mittlerweile 2 davon, die ich dauerhaft am jeweiligen Objektiv lasse. Wenn man das Objektiv nicht auch noch ohne Adapter benötigt, empfiehlt es sich, den Adapter mit ordentlich Kraft aufs Objektivgewinde zu drehen, damit er beim Objektivwechsel nicht aus Versehen am Body hängen bleibt.
durch den inneren Ring des Adapters wird auch der Blendenhebel des Objektivs ganz gedrückt, sodass man das Objektiv vernünfitg abblenden kann, egal ob im A- oder im M- Modus.
durch den inneren Ring des Adapters wird auch der Blendenhebel des Objektivs ganz gedrückt, sodass man das Objektiv vernünfitg abblenden kann, egal ob im A- oder im M- Modus.
Показаны отзывы 121-144 из 174.
