Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
1154 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Дроид-1LVXO
13.01.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I hooked this scanner up to a Pismo Powerbook running 10.2.3, right after downloading all the current drivers from the Canon website. Set up was very simple, although a tad lengthy, as there are two plug-in installations that need to take place in a specific order. The installations themselves were quick.The scanner DOES run natively in OSX. It took me a few attempts to figure out the finer workings of "Canon Toolbox", the program which allows you to scan images from scanner to file. BE SURE TO CLICK "Use Scanner Driver..." button for the advanced settings. I was running into a problem where 1200 DPI images were scanning like absolute junk...grainy, small, and totally worthless. After a few frustrating attempts I realized that the file format was the issue. SCANNING TO PICT FILES IS USELESS, but change the file format to JPG and the images scan and save as one would expect. I'm wondering if other people's comments of this scanner being "too grainy" have to do with the default PICT file format.The scanner feels a bit slower than my ol' UMAX, but that thing only scanned up to 300 DPI, so I would image the increase in resolution has to take more time. I really like the slim design...it's about 20% the size of my old scanner.So far, I like it enough. I'll updated this review in a few months after I've had the chance to really put it to the test.
НоваГость-4FFQO
21.11.2002
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this scanner from here. But I cost me about 4 days to figure out how to let it work under win XP. I have the digitalcamara so I don't need to scan picture. the only thing I need for the scanner is to scan the book or text into editable text.But the software omnipage SE is not working under Win XP. I search the help from this company and sent e-mail last weekend but the e-mail system is not working.Monday and tuesday I called the 800 number the 800 number's function is to provide a pay phone number. After I dailed the pay phone number and waiting about 20 minutese still the recording. Tuesday I sent e-mail again and again, one of them was accidentally working. Wendsday I got a reply from the technicalservice. He told me that this software (omnipage SE) is working on Win XP because he got no complain ! I sent him the screenprint out error and the menu word (the manu said only working under win98, 2000, NT while the box say it is working under win XP). The service person Thurday sent me e-mail said his company can't see the attachment files. So, I sent the word description and also created a hotmail account and give him the account number and password and let him log on this account to see the attachment files.I got no reply Thusday. So, I will return this product. My suggestion is that unless you are familar this product and expect you are not going to use Win XP you should order this product. You should not expect to get the technical service unless you are waiting a week or more!Good luck.
Синтрон-0UWYW
31.08.2003
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have a fairly new computer with a 2GHz AMD, 1gig ram, onboard USB 2.0 and plenty of HD space. The computer would recognize the scanner and install the drivers, but the scanner would not operate. I purchased and installed an adaptec USB 2.0 controller hoping it would solve the problem since Canon certified compatibility with it, and it still didn't work. My old scanner still works OK with the new computer, and I managed to get this new canon LiDE 50 to work with my old computer with USB 1.1!!! Go figure. I would definately not recommend.
Астероид-3IPBE
09.09.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had a Canon FB630 that went belly up so I bought a Epson perfection scanner because Consumer Reports rated it a fast scanner. Yeah Right! Its fast alright, after it takes time to warm up. So I sold the Epson and bought the Canon Lide 50, Damm! I thought it was the second coming of Christ! No warm up, goes right into a scan and its fast. The scans come out very clean. I would highly recommend this scanner to anyone. The only thing I miss is the Fax button on the canoscan toolbox.
Капеллан-4CNQX
25.09.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Initial item ordered was faulty. Bad logic board. Contacted Canon directly and, using their 'instant replacement' policy, they fedexed me a replacement the NEXT DAY!! Their service dept. is superior. Replacement works great! USB 2.0 hi-speed is fast. Well-made unit. No-brainer to operate :-). Highly recommend.
Супернова-1RMGA
06.03.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
1. Software installation was easy and straightforward.2. Connecting the scanner to the computer was easy.3. Full color preview took 20 seconds.4. Full color scan took 60 seconds (file size was 18 MB).5. The scanner is extremely light, and thin.I just scanned a color photo I am really impressed with the scan quality. I highly recommend this scanner for any home user or general business user. Since I just hooked it up 15 minutes ago, I gave it 4 stars because I don't know how durable it is. For the {money} I paid I am extremely satisfied with the Canon LiDe 30. My other scanner is a SCSI UMAX 1260, which is a 3 pass color scanner, I bought in 1995 for {a higher price}.* I have read reviews from users who said the scanner is extremely slow, and others who said it was fast (as it is on my computer). This difference is caused by the USB version (1.0 or 2.0) that is installed in your motherboard BIOS. To really appreciate this scanner, make sure your computer motherboard BIOS is running USB 2.0!
Спектр-6KXHK
04.05.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have had this scanner for a year adn a half and have put nearly 5000 slides through it. I am happy with the overall quality of the scans for what I paid for this. I use this as a proofing tool-- I only get my negatives developed (when I shoot prints) and then scan them to proof them. Or if I shoot slides and want to put them on the internet or retouch them. The scanner will make up to an 8x12 at 400dpi. which is okay. Again you must look at what you are paying. The neat scratch removing features that the upper models have would be nice but again repeating for the price this is a great little scanner. I have been happy. I even got it to work in XP but it did take some research. Info for installing in XP or 2000 can be found [online.]
НоваГость-1IWAK
20.08.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Beautiful imaging quality, quick, quiet, small footprint. I'm impressed by the whole package. Works great with my Canon i550 printer. Quickest install of hardware that I've ever done. All function perform as promised (all buttons work, etc.). A very pleasant suprise. Note: This scanner was picked as the best available under 100 Pounds Sterling by U.K. PC Mag. I agree.
НоваГость-4WYSO
20.04.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I wanted a no frills, easy-to-use scanner. Even though I have never had good luck with Canon, I bought this one based on the recommendations others gave, especially on its compatibility with Windows XP. I had a LOT of problems getting it running. It turns out that the USB on my laptop does not send enough power to run the scanner. Neither the tech support of Canon or Compaq (my computer) helped, but my dad suggested buying a USB hub that has an AC plug. This worked, so if you have problems I recommend trying that. Otherwise, once it I got it running, it seems great. It's kind of slow, but does the job and takes up MINIMUM desk space.
Астрон-2FCNH
22.08.2002
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Canon's new LiDE 30 is certainly a step up in overall image quality when compared to other slimline scanners, especially for under ... I was surprised at how good this scanner was for the price. Canon's adjustable Z-lid feature, a much-needed scanner improvement, is a must if you scan from bulky sources like books or magazines. All photo and text scans made were very crisp and accurate. (Poorer photos will need futher software manipulation to improve their quality beyond the originals.) No power cord--power drawn through the USB cable from the computer--and the lightweight portability of this scanner make it ideal for use with laptops. It can even be set up vertically if space is a problem. The only real drawback to the Canon LiDE 30 is that's it's a bit slow--20 seconds (approx.) for a 4" x 5" photo. Still, in this price range and for a 1200 x 2400 scanner, that's faster than most of the other models at this price. Like most included software packages, the software that comes with the LiDE 30 is adequate for most home uses--though no doubt some can benefit from other scanner software packages available in the aftermarket. If your scanning needs are modest-to-moderate, and your budget demands tight, this is definitely the scanner for you. The best, bar none, in terms of over all quality in this price range that's been offered to consumers up to now.
Лунатик-9SRJW
26.11.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
What's great about this scanner:The slim, unbulky size. It doesn't take up a lot of room and I like the sleek silver look of it.Of course looks aren't everything. It is very purposeful for me, I bought it to scan photos onto my computer. I wanted a high resolution but not a high price and this was the one scanner that met my needs. When I put my scanned photos on Webshots for my albums there, they are high resolution (1460 x 1028) which really pleases me. The software that comes with it is easy to use and has some great features, such as making magazine pictures look really nice after you scan them. There is a blurring feature that makes magazine photos look a little better that I have used often. You can draw on your pictures and my son and I have had some comical fun with this. This scanner can accept books and other bulky things to scan even though its slim. Since I like to be able to "save" great pictures I see in library books, I appreciate this.In case it helps, I have Windows Me on my computer.
Капеллан-6WFFO
29.01.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this scanner knowing full well that it was not the fastest on the market. However, the price, ease of operation,and picture quality make it a very desirable scanner for the money. I've owned a Canoscan N650U for about 2 years now and have had no problems. I have upgraded operating systems many times and they all seem to handle this series scanners without incident. I'm now running WinXP Pro with a XP2600+ processor and I must say I'm impressed. If you are looking for a compact scanner with good looks and great resolution at a affordable price then this is a great buy. The included software makes it easy for anyone to get quality scans with little practice and is very user friendly. Nice job Canon!
ИнфраГость-0IIYW
13.04.2003
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Please note, this product is "usb 2.0 full speed" which is NOT "usb 2.0 high speed" - it's actually what we all use to know as "usb1.1". Buyer beware - it's the manufacturer's way of misleading consumers. That being said, the previous reviews claiming better performance using true usb2.0 ports on a computer are not valid (for the bottleneck is always going to be the output of the scanner itself).
НеоВояжер-9QEQB
28.02.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
All around great scanner. It's super thin and small and because it's USB bus powered there's only one cable. Scan quality is quite good, though the scans could be a little faster...speed is only average compared to other scanners I've used in the price range. Drivers work fine with Mac OS X 10.2.The thing I like best, though, is the LED illumination. No bulky flourescent lamp that has to turn on and off and can burn out. Very sweet.
Спектр-0SIDZ
19.02.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I received delivery in an unbelievable 21 hours! I had gone out and examined the Cannon 5000F before I placed the order with Amazon.com. I've installed it on Windows XP and am pleased beyond expectations. I primarily wanted it for film and slide copying. It does that and copying and photo scanning up to my expectations and standards. I 've been involved in photography (darkroom included) for years and find this great to bring my old technology up into the 21 century.
Гравитон-8CXPV
21.02.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased the scanner with a bit of apprehension, due to the price, and the disparity with other scanners. It seemed a wee bit costly -- not overly so, just a bit. Knowing that Canon is a good company, and knowing that poor scanners truly a horrible experience, I bit the bullet and bought it. The software, combined with the scanner, are superb. I highly recommend this product.
Фотон-7DQEA
23.08.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I thoroughly researched scanners before I selected the CanoScan N122OU. Several brands and models included the high resolution output which I need for my photography hobby work, but the deciding factors for this model for me were:1) It is very thin and lightweight -- PLUS it stores vertically on my desk. (My older scanner was heavy, big, and took up LOTS of room.)2) I had confidence in the Canon brand - and still do.Having made the choice, I have had no regrets. It has been easy to set up and use (I can even use it while it is in its vertical position - quite a handy feature that I didn't realize it offered when I was making my selection.)I am pleased and would recommend this to anyone needing a high quality, easy-to-use and easy-to-store scanner.
Альфа-Юнит-6MYSF
25.12.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This film scanner has resulted in excellent results in scanning in older b&w and color negatives and positives. I have created books documenting past travels with little effort. It is not compatible with computers without scsi ports.
Фотон-7CTJJ
13.08.2001
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
First I would like to say that all of you who are buying this scanner as your first are spoiled rotten! My last scanner was purchased about four years ago and served me well. Still works but I decided to upgrade becuase it's quality isn't up to par with my needs anymore. THough it was long ago, I still vividly recall the three days it took to get it, the scsi card, and the drivers all working happily together.This scanner on the other hand had a step by step guide that had me up and running in only two minutes, no joke, didn't even have to reboot.The quality is great. The color balance is excellant, incredibly sharp, and no artifacts or saw edges of any kind. The saturation seemed a little low at defualt so I tinkered with the settings some to get it where wanted.Another big bonus is the film scanner. I've seen other scanners that seem to have rough "quick and dirty" adapters and so forth but this scanner is truly optimized for the purpose. It has a light built into the lid, instead of a mirror system, to ensure balanced light. The image from negative scans is a little soft, I assume that this is cuased by the slight bends in the film. Its not hardly noticable unless studied side by side with a print. The startling aspect is the color. It is extremly vivid. I was rather shocked when I looked at some picures of a past vacation. The perfect color brought back realism that was lacking from the print which was color balanced by a lab technician.I'm looking forward to using the film scanning function for professional purposes but I would also like to point out that is is a very handy feature even for just home use. I'm sure that some of you are like me, with boxes of negatives in the closet and prints scattered to the far ends of the earth. Instead of paying expessive lab fees for all 10,000 of them to processed, I can just browse through them, scanning the ones that look ineteresting and emailing some to buddies.
Астрономад-5ZAEB
12.09.2002
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the LiDE 30 at an Apple retail store based on the fact that the box and several reviews said it was OS X compatible. However, the software would only install in the Classic environment. The Canon website also proclaimed it would not have an OS X driver for the either the LiDE 20 or 30 until sometime this month (Sept. '02). When I returned the scanner, a tech at the store confirmed it was incompatible with OS X. In other words, Canon is not only are blowing smoke at consumers, but have run a number on Apple.
Интеллектор-6SELL
13.10.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
got this scanner out of the box. five minutes later i had an exact reproduction of a family photo on my desktop. is simple the right word? how about "best scanner for the money."my only hope is that canon produce a film negative adapter that will fit this scanner. i'll never get rid of it.
Альфа-Юнит-8YXXF
13.09.2002
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Canon did a great job on this CIS scanner. The image 'looks' good & sharp. But be aware,if you compare with source image, the reproduced colors are not exactly same as original. Impressive scanner, but I'd recommend D1250U2F. Images from D1250U2F is much easier to enhance with sw like photoshp.
Гиперион-5KFIB
17.08.2002
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
When you get it, check the inside glass with flash light before you plug it in. Mine was peppered with grime and dust; Scans show these as white specks everywhere! I'm returning this product from company that does no quality checks on its product. Mine also had DOA film scanner.You can be sure I'll try to avoid all future canon products.
Супернова-2VZXR
14.08.2001
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The sleek design and the high resolution of the scanner attracted me in the first place. But to my surprise, I had big, big troubles to install the device on my labtop which is running windows 98 first edition. It supposed to be plug and play, right? How come I will be so dumb unable to install the device? So the next day I tried my friend's laptop which happens to be running Windows 98 too. Well, It took me less than 5 minutes to setup the device driver, and get it functional. But back to my own home, I still had same problem to set it up. I tried install the hardware manually through the control panel, selecting the "have disk" option, or the "browse" option, but the installation process keeps telling me "no compatible driver was found" on the installation CD-ROM. The installation instructions that comes with the box were so simple, that it tells you nothing except to unplug the device to do the reinstall. The menu said black and white that the scanner supports Windows 98. Later on I realized that my firend's laptop is running Windows 98 Second Edition, while mines is only the first release of Win 98! This made the whole difference! I tried to download from Canon website. The results were the same. Finally I had the conclusion that the device driver is NOT compatible with Win 98 first edition. At that time, I had wasted a whole week of my leisure time! Not to mention I had to return the item ...
Показаны отзывы 1033-1056 из 1154.
