Отзывы о Процессор AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц
Рейтинг:
Неплохо
Неплохо
Краткие характеристики:
- сокет: SP3 LGA
- количество ядер: 16 x 3500-3900 МГц
- объем кэша L2/L3: 8 МБ/256 МБ
- оперативная память: 8 x DDR4 3200 МГц
- тепловыделение: 240 Вт
- техпроцесс: 7 нм
- количество потоков: 32
- ядро процессора: Rome
- назначение: сервер
- дата выхода: Q2 2020
99 отзывов пользователей o AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц
Пользовались
AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
j0252783
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
水冷が必須
箱にも英語で書いてあったけど簡易水冷以上の冷却が必要です。
AM4ソケット最後にして最強のCPUです。３２スレッドすごいです。AI開発やっていますが高負荷時は排熱がすごいです。冬は暖房を切り、夏は冷房を最強にして使いましょう。
AM4ソケット最後にして最強のCPUです。３２スレッドすごいです。AI開発やっていますが高負荷時は排熱がすごいです。冬は暖房を切り、夏は冷房を最強にして使いましょう。
Daniel Harvey
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I upgraded from the Ryzen 3950xt to this one. Great improvement by far. Be aware this is a very hot processor so choose the right cooler AIO or otherwise. Do a lot of research as there is plenty of great coolers out there. Use new products not used as this is expensive.
Stefan T.
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this 5950x in November 2022, for €572.89, and I got a B2 stepping that supports -30 on all cores, in the curve optimizer. I'm using it on an Asus Tuf Gaming B550-Plus motherboard, with some ECC RAM (4 sticks of KTL-TS432ES8/16G).
"Global C-state Control" needs to be disabled in the ASUS BIOS, to avoid hardware errors. Other than that, PBO2 overclocking is trivial and the system is Prime95-stable on air-cooling (NH-D15).
I'm very happy with this CPU. Gentoo compiles have never been faster :-)
"Global C-state Control" needs to be disabled in the ASUS BIOS, to avoid hardware errors. Other than that, PBO2 overclocking is trivial and the system is Prime95-stable on air-cooling (NH-D15).
I'm very happy with this CPU. Gentoo compiles have never been faster :-)
Ken Shapiro
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It's fast and almost a bit more than I need for gaming & work but, with this cpu I never have a lingering feeling of needing test things over and over due to a bottle neck. I was worried to how hot it ran but, after letting the thermal paste settle in, the Noctua chromax air cooling I have keeps Temps pretty low!
Cesar Silvano de Sousa
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Processador ryzen 9 5950x
Gostei de tudo deste produto, é muito eficiente em todos aspectos, para jogar, para renderizar, para compilar programas entre outros, só tem que tem que ter um arrefecimento muito eficiente pois, em 100% de carga ele aquece muito, mas da maneira como instalei ele não passa dos 63º C, e em pouco trabalho funciona de 35 a 43ºC, más uso agua corrente e não agua presa em um radiador que quando é usado por muito tempo aquece também, sem nada a mais no processador só agua que passa por um dissipador térmico com uma pasta térmica de 13.4 W/M*K, só no gabinete que instalai 8 ventoinhas, para refrigerar a placa mãe e a placa de vídeo então, para mim está perfeito para o meu uso, nem sempre se usa 100% de sua capacidade, é muito difícil, então sobra muita potência, era a minha expectativa ter um desses, encaminho os créditos de funcionamento configurações e muitas coisas mais para o nosso querido professor Tito Tech, uma pessoa muito profissional, respeitosa dedicada e carinhosa e é que é parceiro desta loja amazon, com seu canal no Youtube, procurem Tito Tech e assistam seus vídeos, são muito importantes, sobre tecnologia, abraços.
Amazon Customer
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I did not go wrong buying this proc, it'll last me for quite some time.
Amato Infante
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
TOP Ancora a Dicembre 2022
il 7950X offre qualcosa in più in prestazioni ma a scapito di temperature e consumi. Da affiancare a un dissipatore di fascia media-alta.
GUILLAUME Thierry
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Rien à dire sur le processeur
Un petit souci lors de la réception de mon proco, les pins étaient légèrement écrasés, mais le service après-vente Amazon à fait le nécessaire et m'ont retourné un proco neuf qui fonctionne parfaitement. Du coup, j'ai reçu le nouveau et c'est parfait, rien à dire, une bombe. Merci à Amazon
LEO VANEGAS
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Excelente AAA+++
Excelente procesador para trabajo y juegos
Rahman
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This CPU has made my life easier when it comes to all of my hobbies involving rendering large video or audio files. It saves me literal hours per day with how much better it is than my nearly a decade old CPU in my previous PC. Its work performance is great, but it is definitely lacking a bit if you plan on using this for gaming. Since this generation of AMD CPUs regularly go on sale with the 5950X (around $480-500 currently), it makes it even more worth it than for me who bought it at its launch MSRP of $800 USD. I would highly recommend this CPU for work usage, but not so much for gaming as you could get a 10-20% increase in FPS by buying the new high end CPUs (7950X and the 13900K).
てむ・れい
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
1世代前だけど
まだまだ現役で使えます
この製品より早いZEN4はRyzen9 7900Xと7950Xだけだからコストから考えたら十分選択肢に入りますね
16コア32スレは爽快です
あと2年は使えそうですね
欠点は消費電力が多いと言う事で素ね
この製品より早いZEN4はRyzen9 7900Xと7950Xだけだからコストから考えたら十分選択肢に入りますね
16コア32スレは爽快です
あと2年は使えそうですね
欠点は消費電力が多いと言う事で素ね
mp
18.06.2024
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Лучше приобрести 7950x
Лучше приобрести 7950x вместо 5950x. Разница в цене между ними гораздо меньше. Если вы заплатите немного больше за 7950x, вы получите лучшую производительность, чем 5950x. 7950x поддерживает DDR5 и PCI Express 5, так что в конечном итоге вы получили лучшую производительность, чем 5950x, заплатив немного более высокую цену.
Chantal
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Incredible. The Ryzen 5 wasn't nearly powerful enough for the heavy load we were putting on it doing professional audio editing and processing. Upgrading to the 5950X did the trick. This thing is in a PC that makes the Mac Pro look like trash in comparison (because they are, of course, but you get the point).
We haven't been able to overload it yet, despite deciding not to overclock.
We regularly run a Dante network, a DAW (Nuendo) working on Dolby Atmos projects in a 7.1.4 speaker configuration, with video We're syncing audio to, with multiple instances of Waves Clarity VX Pro (by far the most CPU-hogging plugin ever made) 64+ tracks a bunch of other plugins, analog audio processing with just a few microseconds of latency (imperceptible), VSTi instrument plugins, several background plugins needed to operate the Dante network, software needed for all of the controllers (trackball, digital-analog hybrid mixing console, RGB keyboard w/ Macros, RGB PC software, MIDI instruments, etc), Dante Virtual Soundcard for audio references/system audio, OBS, Facebook/Instagram/YouTube, and more all running simultaneously.
This CPU + 128GB CL16 RAM have handled everything we've thrown at it so far. We have CPU servers designed to offload some of the audio processing in order to take much of the load off of the CPU but we haven't needed any of them so far since upgrading the CPU to the 5950X
We haven't been able to overload it yet, despite deciding not to overclock.
We regularly run a Dante network, a DAW (Nuendo) working on Dolby Atmos projects in a 7.1.4 speaker configuration, with video We're syncing audio to, with multiple instances of Waves Clarity VX Pro (by far the most CPU-hogging plugin ever made) 64+ tracks a bunch of other plugins, analog audio processing with just a few microseconds of latency (imperceptible), VSTi instrument plugins, several background plugins needed to operate the Dante network, software needed for all of the controllers (trackball, digital-analog hybrid mixing console, RGB keyboard w/ Macros, RGB PC software, MIDI instruments, etc), Dante Virtual Soundcard for audio references/system audio, OBS, Facebook/Instagram/YouTube, and more all running simultaneously.
This CPU + 128GB CL16 RAM have handled everything we've thrown at it so far. We have CPU servers designed to offload some of the audio processing in order to take much of the load off of the CPU but we haven't needed any of them so far since upgrading the CPU to the 5950X
gaetano
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
ottimo
ottimo prodotto consigliato
DC
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have Excel sheets with over 30k lines per sheet of data that is queried, sorted, lookups. It was slowing my PC to a crawl. The extra cores and threads, along with the speed of this CPU have helped a ton. I decided it is best to get this CPU as it is the best you can get for an AM4 setup. I am not going to upgrade everything just to get the new AM5. So, maxing everything out on my AM4 should set me up for years, and it was cheap.
Marco R.
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Amd
Ist ein top Prozessor
Preis ist ok ist billiger als ein Intel
Ich habe vorher immer Intel gehabt, seit ich auf AMD umgestiegen bin läuft mein Rechner ohne Probleme bis jetzt.
Preis ist ok ist billiger als ein Intel
Ich habe vorher immer Intel gehabt, seit ich auf AMD umgestiegen bin läuft mein Rechner ohne Probleme bis jetzt.
Another Customer
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
With the old G.Skill DDR4-4000 cl18 Memory (Single Rank, 2x8gb) I have, I was able to clock the RAM to 4000mhz, manually adjust the timings, and set the F-Clock to 2000mhz. In Cinebench r15 I'm able to get a score of close to 4700. Here soon I'm going to try with a different kit of dual rank 4000mhz memory with better timings.
The I upgraded to a set of G.Skill Royal 2x16gb DDR4-4000, Dual Rank, CL16 RAM. I was able to run the RAM a little bit past 3800mhz, but it posted the best benchmark scores with the RAM at 3800mhz and the Fabric Clock at 1900mhz. It did take some time to dial in the sub timings. I posted better benchmark scores running Dual Rank RAM at a slower speed in comparison to Single Rank RAM at a higher speed. So far, I can get a scores of 11600 in Cinebench R20 and 4950 in Cinebench R15. The key here is to get good RAM and tweak the subtimings..... which might take a while.
I also have PBO enabled and I downloaded the PBO program. Although I didn't touch the PBO program. Having ti running seems to help benchmark scores. If you're having trouble getting the PBO program to install then Restore the BIOS to Default settings.
When I got my RTX 3080ti I tested it in a system with an overclocked 8700k (actually an 8086k) at 5.3ghz with an AVX offset of -2, and I have a kit of RAM running at 3600mhz, cl16 with XMP enabled. Running the FFXV benchmark, 1080p Standard Quality, it scored 17500. With the 5950x (RAM tuned at 3800mhz, 1900mhz FCLK, subtiming tightened) the score was 22100. That's a pretty big bump. However, at 4k with the settings turned up you may not notice a difference.
The board I'm using is the Crosshair VIII Hero wifi and I'm using the Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420. I was using the 360mm version of the Arctic cooler, but I'm getting slightly higher clock speeds with the 420mm version.
The main Con I have is it took way too long to get this CPU. I've been trying since day 1 and it took several months to get this processor. The other con I have is by the end of 2021 AMD is going to release a version of this CPU that had more cache. Look up AMD V-Cache. I found this out after getting this CPU. Even with all that said, I feel fortunate to have this CPU and I'm very happy with it. I compress a lot of files and this CPU make doing this a breeze.
Ryzen 9 5950x
Crosshair VIII Hero Wifi
32gb 2x16gb G.Skill Royal DDR4-4000 CL 16-16-16-16-36
Radeon VII, GTX 1080, RTX 3080ti
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Corsair AX1200i
Gigabyte 1tb NVME PCI-E 4.0
Samsung 980 Pro 1tb
Corsair Obsidian 900D case
The I upgraded to a set of G.Skill Royal 2x16gb DDR4-4000, Dual Rank, CL16 RAM. I was able to run the RAM a little bit past 3800mhz, but it posted the best benchmark scores with the RAM at 3800mhz and the Fabric Clock at 1900mhz. It did take some time to dial in the sub timings. I posted better benchmark scores running Dual Rank RAM at a slower speed in comparison to Single Rank RAM at a higher speed. So far, I can get a scores of 11600 in Cinebench R20 and 4950 in Cinebench R15. The key here is to get good RAM and tweak the subtimings..... which might take a while.
I also have PBO enabled and I downloaded the PBO program. Although I didn't touch the PBO program. Having ti running seems to help benchmark scores. If you're having trouble getting the PBO program to install then Restore the BIOS to Default settings.
When I got my RTX 3080ti I tested it in a system with an overclocked 8700k (actually an 8086k) at 5.3ghz with an AVX offset of -2, and I have a kit of RAM running at 3600mhz, cl16 with XMP enabled. Running the FFXV benchmark, 1080p Standard Quality, it scored 17500. With the 5950x (RAM tuned at 3800mhz, 1900mhz FCLK, subtiming tightened) the score was 22100. That's a pretty big bump. However, at 4k with the settings turned up you may not notice a difference.
The board I'm using is the Crosshair VIII Hero wifi and I'm using the Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420. I was using the 360mm version of the Arctic cooler, but I'm getting slightly higher clock speeds with the 420mm version.
The main Con I have is it took way too long to get this CPU. I've been trying since day 1 and it took several months to get this processor. The other con I have is by the end of 2021 AMD is going to release a version of this CPU that had more cache. Look up AMD V-Cache. I found this out after getting this CPU. Even with all that said, I feel fortunate to have this CPU and I'm very happy with it. I compress a lot of files and this CPU make doing this a breeze.
Ryzen 9 5950x
Crosshair VIII Hero Wifi
32gb 2x16gb G.Skill Royal DDR4-4000 CL 16-16-16-16-36
Radeon VII, GTX 1080, RTX 3080ti
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Corsair AX1200i
Gigabyte 1tb NVME PCI-E 4.0
Samsung 980 Pro 1tb
Corsair Obsidian 900D case
kurth
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Make my PC like beast
Jon96789
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My current PC came with a 12-core AMD 3900X with a base speed of 3.8 GHz and max clock speed of 4.6 GHz. This new 5950X has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHZ and max rated speed of 4.9 GHz.
The 5950X replaced the 3900X using the same motherboard, case and cooler. The 5950X runs faster, peaking at 5 GHz but usually averages at 4.45 GHz. my old 3900X would peak at 4.2 GHz and average at 3.9 GHz. What is more amazing is that the 5950X runs a lot cooler than the 3900X. The 5950X peaks at 80 degrees C but averages 72 degrees. My old 3900X peaked at 95 degrees and averaged at 85 degrees. Add the fact that the 5950X draws less power than the 3900X to boot! You can even reduce power consumption by going into Power Options in Control Panel and select Power Saver mode. It will drop the idle CPU speed from 3.5 GHz to 1.7 GHz. But you must revert to AMD Ryzen High Performance or Balanced profiles for the CPU to perform at peak speed and the Power Saver mode throttles the CPU under most cases. Power Saver mode will drop the idle temps from 50+ degrees down to 35-40 degrees.
I use my PC for rendering videos. Unfortunately, the software I use does not scale too well with additional cores, but it still makes a difference. What used to take 45 minutes now takes about 35 minutes, so about a 20% increase in speed. Other than rendering, there is not much difference with the new CPU as the 3900X is pretty fast as it is.
The big question is whether the 5950X is worth the additional $250 over the 12-core 5900X. If you are using software that takes advantage of the additional four cores, then yes. But for most people, the 12-core 5900X will suit them perfectly, as the 5950X is only about 10-15% faster than the 5900X but at a bump of 30% in price. The 5900X is a better value than the 5950X. It would be interesting to see what AMD will do now since the new Intel 12900K CPU outperforms the AMD at a $150 lower price.
But the Intel requires a new motherboard (and the boards are quite expensive), new DDR5 memory (which is REAL expensive) and a heavy-duty cooler since the Intel draws nearly double the power than the AMD and generates a lot more heat, hitting 95 degrees easily. All this means that the Intel, while a cheaper CPU, will cost a few hundred dollars more because the supporting components are a lot more expensive.
The 5950X replaced the 3900X using the same motherboard, case and cooler. The 5950X runs faster, peaking at 5 GHz but usually averages at 4.45 GHz. my old 3900X would peak at 4.2 GHz and average at 3.9 GHz. What is more amazing is that the 5950X runs a lot cooler than the 3900X. The 5950X peaks at 80 degrees C but averages 72 degrees. My old 3900X peaked at 95 degrees and averaged at 85 degrees. Add the fact that the 5950X draws less power than the 3900X to boot! You can even reduce power consumption by going into Power Options in Control Panel and select Power Saver mode. It will drop the idle CPU speed from 3.5 GHz to 1.7 GHz. But you must revert to AMD Ryzen High Performance or Balanced profiles for the CPU to perform at peak speed and the Power Saver mode throttles the CPU under most cases. Power Saver mode will drop the idle temps from 50+ degrees down to 35-40 degrees.
I use my PC for rendering videos. Unfortunately, the software I use does not scale too well with additional cores, but it still makes a difference. What used to take 45 minutes now takes about 35 minutes, so about a 20% increase in speed. Other than rendering, there is not much difference with the new CPU as the 3900X is pretty fast as it is.
The big question is whether the 5950X is worth the additional $250 over the 12-core 5900X. If you are using software that takes advantage of the additional four cores, then yes. But for most people, the 12-core 5900X will suit them perfectly, as the 5950X is only about 10-15% faster than the 5900X but at a bump of 30% in price. The 5900X is a better value than the 5950X. It would be interesting to see what AMD will do now since the new Intel 12900K CPU outperforms the AMD at a $150 lower price.
But the Intel requires a new motherboard (and the boards are quite expensive), new DDR5 memory (which is REAL expensive) and a heavy-duty cooler since the Intel draws nearly double the power than the AMD and generates a lot more heat, hitting 95 degrees easily. All this means that the Intel, while a cheaper CPU, will cost a few hundred dollars more because the supporting components are a lot more expensive.
Amazon Customer
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've upgraded from my Ryzen 7 1800X recently. I waited coz I was hoping we'll have 5950X3D, but anyways. The gain in performance is substantial. Plus no more random freezes. (Yeah, it happened even after RMA, although less frequently, I suppose) I bought it at around CAN$660, when 7950X was still around CAN$790. I think it's worth the upgrade.
Craig C.
18.06.2024
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This thing runs HOT, so much so that I wouldn't recommend running one without an AIO cooler, though something like a Noctua NH-D15 air cooler will work reasonably well depending on use case and workload.
That said, it offers blistering performance in gaming and absolutely crushes heavy all-core workloads. Didn't matter what I threw at it, the 5950x smashed the task and did it fast.
Not the best value for performance if you're ONLY buying it for gaming, a 5800x or 5900x would be more appropriate in that case if money is a factor. However, if you are gaming & streaming, or using this for video editing / image manipulation / software development, it's a workhorse that will surely impress.
Be that as it may, it appears there are frequent issues with potentially faulty cores causing hard reboots, especially on idle. Sadly the one I received was rebooting multiple times per day, and on the worst day I was unable to even log in to Windows for 10 minutes as it would reboot before it even reached the desktop.
Unfortunately, the research I did showed it's not an uncommon issue and could be caused by several things (all of which I tried to rectify with the most common software / settings "fixes", but was unsuccessful). However, unequivocally, the solution those users reached after exhausting all the possible fixes was to RMA the CPU, which, upon receiving a new CPU, stopped the random reboots in most cases.
Thus, I have been left no other option but to return this faulty CPU and hope the next one I receive works as it should.
Without the random hard reboots, though, this thing is an absolute monster of a CPU and, providing you can acquire one that is fully functional, would do well in any system with frequent intensive workloads.
I would have rated a perfect 5/5 had I not spent almost a month troubleshooting an issue that was out of my control.
That said, it offers blistering performance in gaming and absolutely crushes heavy all-core workloads. Didn't matter what I threw at it, the 5950x smashed the task and did it fast.
Not the best value for performance if you're ONLY buying it for gaming, a 5800x or 5900x would be more appropriate in that case if money is a factor. However, if you are gaming & streaming, or using this for video editing / image manipulation / software development, it's a workhorse that will surely impress.
Be that as it may, it appears there are frequent issues with potentially faulty cores causing hard reboots, especially on idle. Sadly the one I received was rebooting multiple times per day, and on the worst day I was unable to even log in to Windows for 10 minutes as it would reboot before it even reached the desktop.
Unfortunately, the research I did showed it's not an uncommon issue and could be caused by several things (all of which I tried to rectify with the most common software / settings "fixes", but was unsuccessful). However, unequivocally, the solution those users reached after exhausting all the possible fixes was to RMA the CPU, which, upon receiving a new CPU, stopped the random reboots in most cases.
Thus, I have been left no other option but to return this faulty CPU and hope the next one I receive works as it should.
Without the random hard reboots, though, this thing is an absolute monster of a CPU and, providing you can acquire one that is fully functional, would do well in any system with frequent intensive workloads.
I would have rated a perfect 5/5 had I not spent almost a month troubleshooting an issue that was out of my control.
Brother From Another Planet
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Kein Scam, Preis inzwischen geerdet
Zum Release wollte AMD teilweise über 1.000 Euro sehen für die CPU und Scammer stopften sich anscheinend die Taschen voll. Beides ist aktuell wohl Geschichte. Ich konnte die CPU hier für unter 600 Euro kaufen und es kam auch eine Box mit der CPU und nicht bloß eine Tüte. Der Wechsel auf einem Gigabyte X470 Board mit AM4 von 2018 lief ohne Probleme, da ich das BIOS eh aufgrund von Sicherheitspatches auf dem neuesten Stand hatte. Unter dem F60-Patch bleibt der Rechner aber dunkel. Ansonsten: Nach Wechsel der CPU kurz dem TPM erklären, daß es einen neuen Hash generieren darf und dann lief Windows 10 wieder. Bei verschlüsselten Partitionen muß man den Bitlocker oder Encryption Key zwingend kennen.
Die Performance ist eher für Berechnungen / Content, als auf Gaming optimiert und man sollte das Geld, das zwischen 5800X und 5950X liegt, lieber in die 5800X und dann Rest dann in die GPU stecken. Aber auch wenn man auf dem 5950X zockt, liefert er naturgemäss. Die FPS gehen logischerweise dabei nicht durch die Decke im Vergleich zu der 2700X, die ich vorher drin hatte, aber es wirkt auch auf Single Core runder und weniger mikroruckelnd, so daß ich in Summe schon zufrieden bin.
Wer das Geld also gerade herum liegen hat, macht hier wenig verkehrt und solange die CPU unter 600 bleibt. Wer nur auf Gaming optimiert, dem sollten die 8 Cores der 5800X auch noch dicke für diesen Zweck reichen. Die 16 Cores der 5950X sind eher für eine Zukunft, in der man erwartungsgemäß die CPU dann eh wieder getauscht hat.
Leider ist der Kühlungslärm erwartbar auch etwas lauter geworden. Ich habe weder gemessen, noch mir die Umdrehungen der Kühler angeschaut, aber gerade unter Last ist der Rechner auch mit einem Scythe Mugen 5B wieder deutlicher vernehmbar, als vorher. Logisch: Gleicher Formfaktor bei doppelten Kernen. Jedenfalls denke ich jetzt über meinen ersten AIO-WC nach und die Industrie lacht sicher amüsiert.
Die Performance ist eher für Berechnungen / Content, als auf Gaming optimiert und man sollte das Geld, das zwischen 5800X und 5950X liegt, lieber in die 5800X und dann Rest dann in die GPU stecken. Aber auch wenn man auf dem 5950X zockt, liefert er naturgemäss. Die FPS gehen logischerweise dabei nicht durch die Decke im Vergleich zu der 2700X, die ich vorher drin hatte, aber es wirkt auch auf Single Core runder und weniger mikroruckelnd, so daß ich in Summe schon zufrieden bin.
Wer das Geld also gerade herum liegen hat, macht hier wenig verkehrt und solange die CPU unter 600 bleibt. Wer nur auf Gaming optimiert, dem sollten die 8 Cores der 5800X auch noch dicke für diesen Zweck reichen. Die 16 Cores der 5950X sind eher für eine Zukunft, in der man erwartungsgemäß die CPU dann eh wieder getauscht hat.
Leider ist der Kühlungslärm erwartbar auch etwas lauter geworden. Ich habe weder gemessen, noch mir die Umdrehungen der Kühler angeschaut, aber gerade unter Last ist der Rechner auch mit einem Scythe Mugen 5B wieder deutlicher vernehmbar, als vorher. Logisch: Gleicher Formfaktor bei doppelten Kernen. Jedenfalls denke ich jetzt über meinen ersten AIO-WC nach und die Industrie lacht sicher amüsiert.
shane
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Il avait l'aire bien dommage que j'ai reçu une boîte vide
Reçu aujourd’hui boite endommager et processeur manquant 600€ qui s'envole super ...
Stalyn Reyes
18.06.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Excelente procesador
Llego con la caja intacta, excelente procesador para la creación de contenido y elaboración de 3D digital. Hasta el momento todo va muy bien. Ya veremos luego
Показаны отзывы 1-24 из 99.
Лучшие цены сегодня на AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц
График изменения цены AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц
Обзоры и руководства на AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц
Характеристи AMD EPYC 7F52 SP3 LGA, 16 x 3500 МГц
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
