Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100

сразу скажу, что я не профи в фотографировании-ставлю всегда авто + режим и не задумываюсь больше не о чем. Фотки получаются отличные!...

При компактном размере отличные возможности
Купила фотоаппарат полгода назад, и фотографирую пока только на автомате, как «чайник» , но очень довольна покупкой. Надеюсь в ближайшее время использовать все его преимущества.

почитав здесь отзывы решил приобрести и ни капельки не пожалел.
Опишу только главные функции фотоаппарата,так как полезность наличия всяких фишек и наворотов сугубо индивидуально оценивается каждым.
Ранее были: мыльницы-sony w5, w3...,casio, nikon 8200, зеркалки sony альфа 100 kit и алфа 580 + tamron 17-50/2.8.
Корпус, вспышка,экран на отлично.
Вспышка расположена не удобно,под указательным пальцем,но после своего открывания есть много места ,чтобы взять фотоаппарат стандартным хватом.
Кнопки управления на тыловой стороне слишком маленькие,подписи к ним плохо читаемы.
Автофокус быстрый ,но худший по наведению на желаемый объект среди всей линейки sony. В фокус берет абсолютно весь кадр. Если вам нужно сфокусироваться на определенном объекте,то выбор только с фокусом в центре или регулируемым пятном.
Sony сделала первый раз неудобное меню в своем аппарате.
Качество...

У меня до этого фотоаппарата был Sony 13 пикселей. Так вот, он ничем не отличается. Фотографии абсолютно одинакового средненького качества. Цвета не передает реальные. По краям фото объекты искажаются.

Снимаю более 10 лет на цифру Canon A70, S1 IS, S3 Is, Nikon P7000 есть зеркалка Sony A580. Купил RX100 2 Месяца назад отснял 2000 кадров, испытал все режимы. По функциям фотоаппарат фотоаппарат превосходит зеркалки начального уровня, по шумам чуть проигрывает, матрица меньше. По динамическому...

I am a blogger as well as someone who just wants my everyday photos to look good, but I was tired of carrying a heavy camera everywhere--especially carrying lenses in my purse. It's just such a hassle for me, when I can just use my phone or iPod to snap photos on the go. Until now, previous point & shoots just weren't worth it to carry around when the quality was comparable to photos taken my my phone.When I heard about the RX100, I wasn't sure if I could justify a $650 point & shoot. After about two weeks and reading at least two dozen reviews and viewing flickr galleries taken with the RX100, I finally decided to go ahead and order it. I will be moving to Japan in a month, so I figured it will be a worthwhile investment. Plus the value in always having a camera on you is priceless. For $650 though, I debated if I should just get a Sony NEX5 instead... it is a little bigger than an RX100, lighter/smaller than my Canon Rebel T3i. The reason I didn't is I didn't want to fall into the habit or purchasing lens for yet another camera.So far, the image quality has been pretty good. Photos are great. Taking high-quality HD videos is a cinch (just get a 64 GB memory card and maybe an extra battery). The camera feels good in my hand--it feels very solid and isn't too heavy or light, though I am considering purchasing a grip (if not the case). It takes photos/starts up very quickly, takes excellent photos in low-light settings. Regular photos still look very crisp.The RX100 still gets a five star review from me. Highly recommended, as the RX100 is years ahead of other point & shoot cameras.

Мне его недавно привезли, можно сказать, я только изучаю. Но не смотря на незначительные недостатки, я уже в восторге! Понятно, что за эти...

Брал второй камерой в семью, чтобы не дергали меня с дорогой зеркалкой по бытовым событиям. Хотел камеру, чтобы была компактной и делала класные снимки в авто, снимала видео. Сравнивал и потестил с Nikon 7700, canon x1, canon g15, Panasonic lx7. В финале остались Panasonic и Sony, т.к., Остальные чуть велики и требуют мастерства, чтобы получались хорошие фото у жены и у дочки. Так вот Sony по качеству фото даже в авто режимах на порядок выше low cost заркалок. Очень доволен, т.к. Не думал Что компакт может давать такие фото. Разница по фото выше чем разница в стоимости У ближайших компактов. Стоит своих денег. Ищите сборку японии, т.к. В одной сети смотрел сборку и Китай и Японию.

Проверил камеру в магазине на шумы - провел тест-эксперимент на разных ISO. Несмотря на достаточно крупную матрицу и высокую цену, в JPG небольшой шум начинается от ISO 400. НА ISO 800 он хорошо виден. Скажем так, есть намного более недорогие фотокамеры с более высокими показателями.В RAW ситуация лучше. Но будут ли  начинающие фотолюбители иметь желание столь себя заморачивать?Не ожидал подобного от столь дорогой камеры. Пожалуй, фотокамера не подойдет  фотографам с высокими требованиями к качеству.

Собственно брал на тест на предмет покупки как третью (есть зеркало и водонепроницаемая сонька). Разочаровался. Для сравнения была взята зеркалка d40 с 18-105 и отфоткан новогодний вечер. Тест в помещении показал следующее: да светосила есть, а вот ГРИП очень большая. Скажем в пределах комнаты на 18-105 на фокусном 80 могу добиться размытия и переднего и заднего фона. На RX-100 еле размывает задний фон, пробовал различные сочетания диафрагмы-фокусного не впечатлился. Хотел большего честно говоря. Зеркалка не то что не проиграла а, пожалуй, выиграла во всех режимах причем это 5-летняя d40 с CCD матрицей и макс ИСО 800, а ведь скажем 5100 будет получше. От зума RX-100 ожидал большей плавности. Как резюме не готов отдать 25 за девайс подобного класса. Для меня пока он не стоит своих денег. Все сугубо IMHO.

i have been a long time fan of the sony cyber shots with the carl zeiss lens. This one is the best so far. i have been a professional photographer for 33 years. i use nikon for paying jobs but i like to carry a nice small camera when i go for a run or just out to with friends. the rx100 has all the features i use in a high end pro camera, plus a super sharp lens. of all the cameras i have ever owned this has impressed me the most. the only draw back i can think of is that it doesn't have a long focal length. for me, this is not a problem. i like getting close and wide. the wide angle is very wide, the micro lets you get within 2 inches of your subject. i love this camera!

I took the RX100 and a Canon 5D Mark III plus assorted L-series lenses on a trip to Antarctica. The typical scene there includes white snow and dark water or black rock, thus presenting the camera with the dual challenges of high contrast and nothing of a typical 18 percent gray density from which to meter. Despite mostly being left on "green idiot mode", the RX100 typically produced far better JPEGs than the $3500 Canon, regardless of what exposure was used on the Canon. The long lenses of the Canon were better for wildlife, of course, but I came to rely on the little Sony for scenery and also for its built-in panorama mode. It is possible that if I spent a few months in Photoshop working with the Canon RAWs that I could eventually produce some great JPEGs, but I'm not planning on living to 225 years of age.I also have a Sony NEX-6 and like the results from that camera and especially its flip-up rear screen, but it is not as pocketable and does not have a motorized lens cap so the RX100 wins for convenience.As the founder of photo.net it is kind of embarrassing when people admire a photo from Antarctica and ask what exotic camera it was taken with and the answer is "A Sony point-and-shoot", but the JPEGs don't lie![If this were my only camera, the deep menus of the user interface would drive me a little crazy. But I use the RX100 for the things where "green idiot mode" works well and use the Canon DSLR for other stuff, e.g., sports, birds, etc.]

Полностью согласен с предыдущим отзывом, поэтому просто дописал свое мнение.
Если есть возможность купить этот агрегат — берите без тени сомнения. Супервещь.

This camera is astonishing, so fun to use. I carry it everywhere and have created thousands of personal art photos with it. I actually use it as a side camera for commercial work, and throw in a few off-beat photos using the creative filters, and my clients love it! After 50 years of photography, this really brings the fun back. But don't buy this one! Sony is about to release an updated version, the RX100R. They removed the anti-alias filter so they will have extreme detail, an idea they copied from Fuji's astonishing X cameras (which I also use). Don't know if I'll update since these already create images suitable for gallery exhibitions (which I'm creating with it), and I love that it shoots in a variety of shapes, including square (which is what I use). May be the coolest camera ever for a side camera for a pro.

I know that this if five star rated, but not in my experience. Had to buy the book by Alexander White in order to get comfortable using it, and still am not getting great photos, especially in low light.

Can't download movies from camera to Mac or Ipad.Customer support says software not Mac compatible without using some sort of workaround.Thats a no-go for me.Back it goes.

Хотется отрвать руки тому кто напечатал «что айфоны фотают не хуже» — нормальным людям парят мозги... Берите если действительно нужно «всегда ссобой + максимум качества».

I had high expectations for the sony rx100 after seeing all the rave reviews, and the specs. I got it and tried it for last two days with different indoor shots, took about 100 shots total. The result: image quality is about the same as my two year old nikon s8100 which cost me 250usd back then. Sorry folks, but it's all hype and clever marketing.I can't tell much difference between pictures taken by rx100 vs my s8100. The main difference I notice is much bigger jpeg files about 4-5 MB in size vs 2 MB. Unless I care to zoom and crop the image, or blow it up to poster size, I don't see any point in buying and keeping the rx100, and don't see the benefit of having 20mb pixel. The colors on the rx100 are too cool, and I prefer warmer colors like those produced by canon. The lens are fast, but only if you don't zoom and don't use flash. Shot to shot with flash on was a pity, almost 2 to 4 seconds lag in between depending on the charge level of the battery and amount of zoom. SLRs are a different animal because you can get great shots without flash, but not your average point and shoot. The battery drained much faster than I expected. Grip is not so good because the body is too smooth. What's worse? The rx100 struggled to focus on some of the macros I tried especially with full zoom. The 3.6x zoom is simply not sufficient; 7x to 10x zoom is needed for taking pics of anything out of your reach such as a water lilly in a pond, or a singer far away on stage in a concert.For a 650usd camera, I can't justify keeping it unless I'm overwhelmingly impressed and pleased by all the features. At this price level, I would recommend skipping this camera and go for a real SLR instead. I'm waiting for the next generation of the sony nex 5n.

This is my "just out of the box" review.I'll write a review of how well it actually works after I've used it for a while.First I must explain that I'm 77 years old and I HATE "miniaturization".I'd much prefer it if this camera were about twice as big, with mare easily readable controls.The camera retails for $648 on Amazon, but you can't really use it without a thirty-two dollar SD card, and you have to charge the battery in the camera, unless you purchase a separate battery charger. You need a camera bag (sold separately) in order to properly carry it around without damaging it.So, what we really have here is an eight-hundred dollar camera.Two flimsy-looking but apparently effective little "straps" are included. These are supposed to be inserted in the two teeny-weenie little slots on either side of the camera. But the straps are too big to be easily (or any other way) slipped through the slots. I am utterly at a loss here. I cannot for the life of me figure out how to get these things into the slots provided. Even if I DO get these things attached, I need to by a "strap" (sold separately) that attaches to them. Marvelous marketing strategy except that in my case I'm not a happy customer.I'm wondering what else will not work quite as I expected, without the purchase of some other "extra". I'm predicting that before I;m done, this will be a thousand-dollar camera. At that point I'll be afraid to take it out of the house.I think I'd better buy the warranty and the accidental damage insurance...

I'll write a more details review later, but MAN is THIS a NICE camera! It is much smaller than I anticipated, which is awesome! I wanted a high quality pocket camera a month in advance for a Disney World trip, so I was willing to shell out the cash for a onetime deal, and so far this camera is making me believe that I made the right decision. I'll report back after the WDW trip.Returned from my WDW trip, and I feel fully justified in spending $650 for this camera. The camera is very small, light weight, and takes great pictures. I wanted a high end point and shoot, which I would say that this is, and I am not disappointed. I highly recommend this to any novice who wants fantastic, high quallity shots in a ultra compact camera.