купил этот HDD для надежного хранения данных, не пожалел денег - "повелся" на обещание повышенной "серверной надежности". Надежность оказалась хуже, чем у обычных HDD: через 3.5 года щадящей работы...
Аэронавт-0AZBY
10.02.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
+ Три года работал без нареканий
- Через три года вышел из строя
В январе 2011 года были закуплены 4 штуки, установлены в сервер, работали в рейде 10 в круглосуточном режиме. В январе...
Альфа-Юнит-2HVNC
13.01.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
+ Высокая скорость работы
- Не высокая надежность.
Чуть более чем за 2 года из 4 дисков 2 вышли со строя.
Нейрон-8LIOJ
05.08.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
сгорел через 4 месяца, восстановить инфу не могу, нет запчасти взамен сгоревшей и снято с производства. Стоило покупать...
Синтрон-8DKOH
18.10.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
+ Только Seagate и только NS!
- После падения модели ST31000524NS со стола очень сильно болит мизинец на правой ноге ))
Закуплена партия в начале 2010 (на страх и риск, в виду того, что серия...
НеоВояжер-1LHUI
24.01.2011
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
+ Обычный винчестер. Стандартные скорость и работа. Слишком сильно греется и шумит. Теоретически должна быть масса достоинств - на практике ни одного!
- Очень быстро умер. Компания Seagate дальше продолжает разочаровывать нас серией...
ОмниКод-4QBCE
25.02.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
+ Работает довольно быстро, по сравнению с WD и самсунгом
- Шумит, греется, но не больше чем самсунг
Стоит в раиде 2 месяца, жалоб нету, все равно работает...
Спектр-5ULLT
13.09.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Here is Seagate's little dirty secret. The company sells its identical capacity external and internal hard drives under different names: Free Agent, Expansion, Barracuda, and others. Consumers are led to believe that there are various grades and qualities because the outer shells look cosmetically diverse, prices are on a hierarchy, accompanying software are different, and warranties vary..This truth is hidden from consumer - the internal mechanisms for all of these models are identical. This was verified by one of its engineers. The only difference is the accompanying software and warranty. Seagate is the only manufacturer that has a 5-year warranty on their high-end and larger capacity hard drives. Lower-end products have a 1-year warranty..From my experience dating back to the 1980s, I had less problems with the Seagate brand. When this company built its units in America, the products were durable and reliable - they were "tanks." When manufacturing was outsourced to Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand, the life span became much shorter, and defects were very common. To avoid losses because of too many returns, the firm altered its return policy..In the 1-year or 5-year warranty, the manufacturer replaces the original drive that becomes defective. The replacement is a refurbished that usually breaks down within 3-12 months. Because this second drive has a different serial number and is not new, it does not have a warranty..The fallacy of this policy is this. Assuming your new drive goes bad within a month, Seagate replaces it with a refurb. If the second goes bad within another month, there are no more replacements because the original warranty does not transfer over to the second drive. As a result, you really have a two-month warranty. This scenario happened to me..With "rip-offs" like this, buy the cheapest. The hard drive is mechanically identical to the higher-end product. Despite the longer warranty, it is only good for one return..So, what is the alternative? . . . There is none! . . . There are only two other major hard drive manufacturers, and they are bad. The quality control on Western Digitals is terrible - I usually get less than a one year usage. Unknown to most consumers, the warranty starts when the unit was made - not the sale date. So, if the hard drive sits on the shelf for six months before it is sold, the consumer really has a six-month warranty on the purchase. . . . The hard drive always go defective after a week or month when the warranty date expires. The third firm is Hitachi. The company purchased IBM's hard drive division years ago. The inherited Deskstar technology was horrible. The drive was defective and short-lived. Recently, Hitachi wanted to exit the hard drive business - there were no buyers.
Спасибо за регистрацию на портале Wizemart, вам на почту пришло письмо с подтверждением регистрации, пожалуйста перейдите по ссылке внутри него для подтверждения вашего e-mail