Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000 Body

Am sure this is as fine a camera as previous reviews have commented. Well built, easily handled, but three Nikon D7000 books later, I continue to attempt to master its complexity. As a photo enthusiast my goal is to learn to shoot beyond using the Auto dial, but I can see that will take some intense study. This was a gift, so I will continue to try to crack the deep mystics of the D7000.

My wife loved the camera. It is light , very fast to "recover" flash and took very high quality pics. Howver on second day, the lens "fell off" and would not re-attach. It would re-attach and then fall off again. We had to return it. BTW the return process was not fun. Still awaiting a "call tag" to be delivered to my office by UPS. Was supposed to takle 1-5 business days and we are still waiting. This is day 6.

This camera is just as light as the D90 and lighter than the D300s. However it has titanium alloy inside. It not only out performs the D90 but runs circles around the D300S (the closest two nikons). This is not a full frame camera like the D700 however the added 16mp I feel helps with the smoothness of the images at hi ISO, and the quality is actually comparable to the D700 and way outperforms any other Dx format. The Color meter is tack on and auto focus is crazy fast and smart. Added feature of U1 and U2 presets are invaluable setting the camera how you want and save it then being able to switch to a second completely custom preset of your choice. Also the two sd slots backing each other up or expanding your capacity is a nice upgrade. There is a quite mode that is crazy quite. I shot some images handheld in candlelight with the 35mm f1.8 at ISO 6400 the shots were exposed perfect and very low noise. WOW! I love this camera. The only issue is that cs4 camera raw/ photoshop/ Lightroom 2 does not recognize the nikon NEF file from the D7000 they have to be converted to DNG or upgrade to CS5 level.

60D was less expensive than the D7000 with some extra features listed below:60D raw editing software came with camera and was free yet very powerful.D7000 did not come with raw editing software and costs an additional $180 for capture NX2 :-(Video on the 60D is more cinematic with more manual control.60D will film at 60 fps and D7000 max frame rate is 30 fps. 60 fps is great for slow motion and analyzing my golf swing.60D is lighter and easier to carry around.60D has a much bigger buffer when taking many continuous shots. The D7000 buffer would fill up after about 3 seconds of taking raw photos.

I had to replace my trusted D70s after 5.5 hard years of use. With a library of Nikon autofocus lenses, I wanted a camera that allows maximum use of the capabilities of my tried and true lenses but also defines the latest technology. The D7000 accomplishes this easily with the ability to make picture taking easy when I don't want to bother. When I want to be creative, it allows me to do things I never thought of with the new focusing and metering systems.My 10 year old son wanted to try the camera and I wanted to have some fun. I set the camera on high speed and told him to shoot away. He fired off about 8 pictures in just over a second, stopped and look at me while saying, "Cool!" It isn't often that I can impress the kids! By the way, each of the pictures was perfect in focus and exposure. There seems to be no compromising with this camera!

+Amazing image quality.+Huge dynamic range.+ISO 6400 is totally useable.+Perfect, fast, and reliable auto-focus.+Comfortable to hold.+Flash exposures are almost always perfect+The best RAW files I've seen from any crop sensor camera.+Very good battery life.-HD movies no as good as Canon DSLRs, and with way less options.-Nikon lenses are usually more expensive than Canon lenses.-There's almost too many options buried in the menus... in future Nikon's I'd say keep it more simple. Canon's menus are a little cleaner.-You should immediately set-up your Fn. button to take you to the AUTO-ISO menu.My biggest problem with this camera is the movie mode, it's not up to par with Canon DSLRs. However, the still image quality, and 39 point auto-focus destroys Canon's current line-up in my opinion.

I'm extremely happy with this camera. Nikon did it right this time.The camera body is not up to D700 but sturdy and solid enough.The high ISO is much better than in D90 , it's up to D300 level or so.Focusing feature has been dramatically improved. 35 points - not a joke!2 SD card slot - very helpful. I'm using a back-up option during a wedding shoot.I wish d7000 was a full frame camera but you can't ask for any better camera around 1000 bucks.Highly recommended.

REALLY IMPRESSED OF HOW FAST THE D7000 arrived ...THX its GREAT =]. For a used d7000 it sure looks and feels brand new so im happy.!

m29H8LLLJUVG0 / mo18NCP123BRIE3 Length:: 2:23 MinsI'm the guy that posted the infamous "rolling shutter" video on the Nikon D300s 12MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera (Body Only). While the D300s was (and is) an excellent still camera, the video support left something to be desired. I ran the same test (and added some bonus footage) on the D7000 in this video review.I'm happy to say that a majority of the video issues have been resolved in this new iteration. Rolling shutter is still an issue, but it's vastly improved. As you can see from my Thanksgiving footage the video is steady and smooth even without a tripod. The "jelly vision" that plagued the D300s is largely gone.As a still camera the D7000 raises the bar over prior Nikon mid-level cameras. While it's slightly slower than the D300s for stills, it feels a lot more "pro" than the D90 it replaces. The D7000 is constructed out of a durable magnesium alloy body, sports two SD card slots, and has absolutely stunning low-light high ISO performance. You won't need the flash often with a fast lens.Resolution and image quality is also improved. The camera shoots at 16.2 megapixels, a decent bump in resolution from the prior model. The D7000's DX "crop sensor" also means higher pixel density than more expensive Nikon cameras that shoot full frame - great for doing "crop and zooms."Bottom line: this is the camera I was hoping the D300s would be. Excellent stills, durable construction, and outstanding video. It's a worthy replacement of both the D90 and D300s and can easily fit into a professional or semi-professional environment.

This is a very sturdy and reliable camera. Still getting used to the layout and controls (I've been using EOS for 20 years). Compared to my T2i:Same image quality.Easier manual focusing, thanks to the brighter viewfinder.Has silent mode.Same AF speed (at normal situations)Lacks peripheral illumination correction.Has chromatic aberration correction.Lacks 30p video speed.Worse battery grip system (needs to remove it to access the camera battery).Easier to start shooting video.Same high ISO performance.

I have used Nikon cameras since the original Nikon F was introduced.Now the Nikon D7000 is here I am very unhappy with this camera. The still pictures are excellent.But Nikon should have stayed out 0f the movie business until they perfected auto focus in movie mode. I took a trip to Alaska and took 200 plus still pictures that were excellent.But the movies are mostly out of focus that were made in auto focus mode.It is not because I don't know what I was doing it was because of the poor auto focus.When I used manual focus it worked fine.The Nikon D7000 camera does not compare to the Panasonic Lumix GH1 Or The GH2 for movies and the still pictures are just as good as the pictures from the Nikon D7000. My advise is save your self $200 dollars and buy a Panasonic GH2.I would return this camera for a refund,but seller does not have a return policy.I tried to buy this camera from amazon but they did not have it in stock at that time.They recommended the seller I bought from.

Well I just picked it up and started playing with it so for now i give it 5 stars but I will re-review later on.I shoot with a D700 right now and I sold my D90 just to buy this one, I was happy with the d90 but i wanted more ISO capabilities since i often shoot in clubs, weddings etc lots of low light situations. even thou is gonna be my back up camera for shows, it is going to be my main body for when i shoot and video at home my kids and such, so i wanted to make sure it was better than the D90, and so far it is.i shot at 6400 iso under somewhat low light and it looks incredible, the colors and the noise just amaze me and that is why i give it a 5 stars, besides the other goodies that you all know, like the 1080 AF video, weather seal magnesium body, etc it improved a lot, I can only compare it to the D90 since i never used a d300(s), I wish the controls would match more to the d700 so i'm not all over looking for function buttons but oh well. I almost got a d300s just because of that.I also wanted to point out that the test that i did, i used a nikon 24-70 F2.8 witch its a great sharp lens so that also helps.Just make sure you know what functions you need and make a decision base on that, a simple but mighty D40 could be all you need.find my stuff in facebook under [...]/OscarPallares.PhotographythxUPDATEWell a year has passed and i am still in love with this camera, i use it more than my d700, it matches the 35 1.8g lens very well for everyday shooting with awesome IQ. with the more expensive lens like my 24-70 2.8 it just shines at weddings. so don't be affraid to pull out the wallet this baby its so worth it.you can see a lot of my images taken with this camera in fb BUT you won't be able to tell if they were taken with the d7k or d700 so for better camera description find me in flickr.thanks.

I'm sure there are enough reviews that cover tech specs and photo savvy feedback.I own a D5000 as well as this D7000. I was very happy with the D5000 for daily use and for the initial cost staying well below professional prices, delivering above average performance.Now, this D7000, it's just a must have. If you are a Pro, I'm sure you know enough to realize this is one incredible contender for the higher end Nikons, in a far lower price range. If you are the Hobbyist or aspiring up and coming photographer the D7000 will take you to that next level with little effort. The basic Auto settings right out of the box give incredible lighting, Auto-focus and overall adjustments leaving you with pictures that almost seem airbrushed or touched up to some degree. It's almost a shame to have so many wonderful controls and personal adjustments you can make and store on the D7000 when you'll be so happy with the Auto-settings. but once you feel more comfortable or branch out to more difficult shots, or more artistic renderings, you'll be grateful to have a camera so accommodating on so many technical and basic levels. If you want the tech specs, read a review anywhere from anyone and you'll have a dressed up opinion. If you want a great camera and a sound investment, get the D7000 and rely on yourself, not reviews. You won't be sorry.

I have pleasure to own this best of the bests cameras, really gr8 experience capturing pictures using this superb camera.

I was using the D3100, which is a nice camera; I gave it to my daughter along with the 18-105mm that came as a package with the D7000. The 7000 is great. I mostly use it with my Nikkor 70-200mm taking picture of birds and landscapes. I like the option of taking pictures in the RAW mode and being able to edit on the camera. I am new at this but am leaning quickly; I recently retired so I have plenty of time to to run the camera through its paces.

i had nikon d90 and this camera is almost the samei was reading alot of reviews before buying it and everyone was like WOW the ISO and the AMAZING image quality,,,,well it`s not true.it`s just like the d90 which both are not good cameras or you can say over priced .image quality is as same as the cheap D3100 and D5000 but it`s a better built quality dslrif you are reading my reviews well just get the cheap D3100 it`ll do the job or if you are more serious about photography save some extra money and get your self a full frame DSLR like the D700 with 3 prime lenses (50mm f/1.8 D , 24mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.8 ) that would be perfect or just fight nikon and those companies cause this item worth half of it`s price ... 1200$ is too much for that dslri`m FINE with my d7000 and i`d be happy if it was 600$

i really can't say enough about this body.it's a major jump from the D90 i had previously, in both image quality at higher ISOs and in speed/performance.coupled with the 24-70/2.8 and 70-200/2.8, i'm prepared for just about any shooting situation.i really like the DX crop factor, to the point i doubt that i'll ever go FX.really, it's the perfect camera for me except for a few things:* the memory card door opens too easily* i wish there were just a little more room for my pinky (average male hands), but i could always get the MD-11.* and most important, i wish it had stereo microphones for video recording.that last one is really the only thing (aside from the camera breaking) that would make me want to upgrade!

Seriously! After reading some reviews I felt this will be the answer to my prayers. I bought it yesterday and am returning in a couple of days. The pictures are horrible at room light, dark edges, blurry when object is moving even slowly (with scene being sports/ child). Even outside the edges were soft and a little dark. The focus is an issue, as many point out in many forums. I can attribute this to the lens probably, but how will I know? I had a 60D (18-135) for a while, which was fantastic compared to this.This review is to let you know people that many reviews are written by experts who use expensive lens. With normal kit lens (18-105), D7000 is not worth it. 60D was a lot better with its kit lens and 300 cheaper.And the video autofocus is a joke. Rather should have not included it and advertise it.Edited after 30 days of use: Ok guys, A little better now, so improved the ratings from 2 to 3. The SLT a55 is ultimate in video, but fact remains its not an SLR, its a great p&s. Though i still rate 60d higher in some aspects, the ease of use and some features in D7000 made me still stick with this though the image quality can be debated, but with kit lens i cant expect more than what i saw. So planning to purchase 18-200 vr ii and will know completely.

I hope I am ready to move into this beautiful camera. It became hard to find in the Detroit area just as the Christmas season began and then the accessories, ie batteries and lens became a bit harder to find. I hope to get some good practice in during the Christmas vacation.

Bought this camera a few months ago and ever since then my photography has changed dramatically. At the beginning i was confused by the amount of control you had with the settings but now im a well oiled machine with this camera. tons of control and tons of love. this camera is one of the all time greats i have owned so i would recommend this baby to anyone who wants some serious photos in their life.

LOVE my new camera! Put a rush on the delivery so I could use for a photo-shoot...it made it right in time! Thanks for getting it to me on time!

I recently bought it and have had not much time to excel at using all of its feature set yet. Despite that fact, I have a few words to tell about this camera. First of all, image quality is great. Stills could not be any better. Crank up the picture controls and you have got vivid and striking images. Stay with the standard or natural picture control and the images look more refined to your taste. Video, though not seamlessly perfect, serves its job well too. You may not be able to get astonishingly sharp pictures if you use it with its 18-105 mm kit lens. You'd better buy some more expensive glass for that purpose. The only constraint is its ease of use. Some buttons, ISO and White Balance as such, seem to be mislocated, hindering its ease of use. Except for this glitch, the D7000 is an awesome, a joy to use machine. You are unlikely to get disappointed if you buy one.

As a wildlife photographer I was very interested in the higher ISO capabilities of the D7k over my D90. Like many others I had a hard time learning how to use this model effectively even to the point of maybe sending it back. Well, it took about 300 test frames till I became satisfied with the IQ and overall performance of the D7k. Where an ISO of about 320 was the max I liked with the D90 I now shoot a default ISO of 1000 on this body. I found out I need to shoot at higher shutter speeds and that the D7k is not as forgiving as the D90. The ability to fine tune each lens to this body is a big plus. I still have a lot to learn but as it stands right now I'm happy with my switch and plan on keeping it. I'm not sure if this is a good choice for a novice as that would depend on many things. As far as the price/performance ratio I think that can only be decided by each individual.

Please Amazon,can you state on your website where the cameras were made before customers place their orders only to be disappointed that it is made in CHINA or Thailand instead of JAPAN.We are accustomed to having the best lens and body of DSLR made with the highest distinction in Japan. The recent earthquake has made the availability of stocks very limited and we are aware of the price increases,but please don't insult our intelligence by sending us inferior product at inflated prices.Give us the options of making a purchase of these items at a cost,so if we don't want the genuine ones,we may buy the knock off at reduced cost.I want the Nikon D7000 so badly with the 18-105mm lens but was disappointed when one was sent that was NOT made in Japan.Nikon D7000 16.2MP DX-Format CMOS Digital SLR with 3.0-Inch LCD and 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR ED Nikkor Lens