Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000

I'm upgrading from a D90 and from what I've seen so far, I'm glad I went with the D7000 as my new main camera (plan to use the D90 as my backup now).Pros: Faster shutter speed, bigger buttons, smoother command dial rotation, 39-points of AF, 100% viewfinder, dual SD card slots, can save customized shooting settings, battery life is great, fantastic still shots.Cons:- Different battery and battery grip required (from that of the D90).- Video quality is great, but you can hear the mechanics of the autofocus in the video playback...would have to manually focus to avoid this. Would rather see this camera without the video capability and reduce the cost.- No built in PC-sync adapter (would have preferred that over the GPS capability).- Have come across an intermittent issue with autofocus in live view where camera won't lock focus correctly.- RAW format uses full 16.2 megapixels so files are huge (would be nice to see an option that allows you to choose how many megapixels you want to use when shooting RAW).I noticed this camera has a Q mode (Quiet shutter release), which apparently is to silence the shutter noise. I like the idea of this especially when photographing weddings since during the ceremony it's almost dead silent and the camera's shutter noise and the high pitch noise of the flash unit re-energizing itself can be heard by those you're standing next to, but the shutter speed appears to be affected when in this mode. It's slower, so I won't end up using it.Update:Just started messing around with the video more and found that my camera is among the many now that have the dead pixel issue. I tried recording in low light and noticed 2 dead pixels (one green, one blue). Then I tried recording in better lighting and could still see the green pixel. Between the dead pixel issue and autofocus noise, the video capability is more annoying than anything. Because of this I reduced my rating from 5 stars to 4. Also, Nikon has released an update to its firmware on this camera (sorry don't have the link) which they claim helps reduce the dead pixel issue. If I upgrade the firmware and notice that the pixels are no longer there I will change my rating back to 5 stars.

After reading all the hype about this camera, I had very high expectations. The camera surpasses every expectation!I traded up from Nikon D70. Photos in low light are much richer than on my old Nikon. Interior photos with and without flash are much warmer.Fantastic color. The HD video is excellent as well.Well worth the investment, which I had agonized over.Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, was sold out of this camera. Amazon was the only one that had it in stock and delivered in 2 days!!Thank you Amazon. Great experience.

Overall, a very nice camera that far exceeds my abilities as a photographer. My one gripe relates to the "Auto ISO" function when used in conjunction with flash. The camera will generally jump up to your highest selected ISO when flash is engaged. I understand that in previous cameras such as the D90, the ISO would not exceed 400 if flash was engaged, even if the max ISO selected was in fact higher. This sounds like a better arrangment to me. The obvious work-around is to go in and lower the max ISO on your Auto ISO setting when using flash, which is difficult, just a matter of remembering to do this. Seems like something that could be corrrected with a software update, though. An extremely versatile camera. Highly recommended.Update:This camera has a setting under the Auto ISO function where you can set the minimum shutter speed that the camera will use, which is handy. However, some of the newer Nikons have the ability to automatically change this minimum based on the focal length of the lens at the moment. For instance, using a long lens you would likely need a faster minimum shutter speed than with a wide angle lens. The new cameras can automatically adjust the minimum to a higher value when they detect the longer focal length. The D7000 can't do that, which is not a deal breaker for me but would be nice feature to have.

Last Nikon I had was an F3. Currently use an Olympus E-30, with High Quality lenses and the D7000 with pro level lenses. The D7000 is a very complex camera and the first camera I have purchased a guide book for.Ergonomics/design of the camera are quite good for its size. About the same size as the D70s/90. I would prefer a larger body when using pro level lenses. An expensive camera for a novice with a large learning curve for all of the available options of which there is a plethora of. But camera can be set similar to a P&S if one desires.I really enjoy the many direct access shortcuts (over 40) for adjusting everything from focus to flash to white balance and much more. The two custom settings are very easy to set. The LCD on top has some icons (e.g. flash settings) that are really hard to see what they are if you need reading glasses. I miss the Olympus Super Control panel.Some strange things show on top level menus and in the Information Display considering most commonly changed settings. However there are other options to establish a menu that allows one to set up their most common items. But it is another learning curve.The camera seems to shoot about a 1/3 to 2/3 over what I like for exposure. Colors are different from even the D70s but very acceptable. Again both are adjustable. Outstanding at hi ISO. Can shoot very useable photos at 3200 ISO when the user understands what needs to be done.If I had a D90 I'm not so sure I would upgrade. Besides the FX and D300s, and if you want the options/controls - this is the camera to have.BTW - it does not have a mag-alloy body as commonly stated and Nikon's estimated price for the body is $1199.00.

A solid camera with great image quality especially at high ISO. 3200 looks as good as the D200 at 800. Movie aspect is another story. Junk! Unless of course you do silent movies. You will hear the lens, very loudly, foucusing and zooming (a little less when using a zoom). If an external mic helps, nikon has some info on this on their website, then that is a min. of 75 more. That was the least expensive mic they suggested/recomended. If you fix the focus or use manual focus it will be ok. That is the only work around. Focus, auto that is, is terrible. If the movie aspect was not a joke then I would have given this 5 stars. I did not buy this for that aspect, however, Nikon is selling, marketing and pricing it this way. I may try the external mic but do not believe this will help much.One other thing....Nikon support is terrible. Very few people know much about what Nikon sells. As far as still imagaes are concerned ...they are great. Better than my D200 at 400 and up and better color out of the box than the D200 at any ISO.Update: I did not know but in live, manual,movie view mode. You CAN'T adjust Aperture....only ISO and Shutter. you must exit live view, change the aperture, and go back. Maybe I expect too much or do not know much about the video world...this is very possible. If you want a sweet camera then this is a winner. Also, it is very light weight.Update 2: Got the external mic. Audio Technica here at Amazon. Better but still not worth it. You will still hear the lens motor. I have a S lens...silent wave. Focus sucks in live mode.Final: Live view focus is a joke. Video with external mic is a joke. Only manual focus. I used a good lens. Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens (Great lens 1500 now!)

If you've been a "film photographer" your whole life like me, and always wondered what "digital" was all about...this camera was made for you.The Nikkor D7000 with the 18-200mm lens has the look and feel of a real SLR film camera, but with some unique features and quirks. Perhaps most importantly is the fact that this camera does not use film cartridges. Instead, you use computer disks that hold hundreds of photos and have a range of built-in ISOs. Notably, there is no loud winding noise when removing a full disk...it's virtually silent--a welcomed change for wedding/event photographers.Secondly, there is a large screen on the camera's back for viewing the pictures that you just took. The screen also lets you access an internal computer where you use various lists for customization and effects. For example, you can change from color to black and white with a few button maneuvers. After a few weeks, I still haven't used all the computer options.When you're done shooting (wedding, sports, etc.), set your computer to "Import" and you can review on the PC's monitor. Then simply select "Print All" to print all the photos. Ink and paper costs can be as much or more expensive than processing, but it is so convenient once you get the hang of it.No, I'm not selling my Nikon F6, but I'll definitely be getting my money's worth with my new "digital bad boy".Good luck and happy shooting!

You betcha!I went from a glorified point and shoot to this and am easing into the transition quite nicely. I mostly shoot birds and other wildlife--I just bought the 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 and am very pleased with the test shots I took on the first day.This camera is fantastic. There is plenty of information available on the web regarding the D7000--the only concern I want to address is the issue of `sharpness'. It is quite possible that a few people are getting a faulty product, but it is likely that many of the folks complaining about sharpness are doing something wrong. I am getting very sharp pictures with this camera and I am a complete novice. When I am sloppy with technique it always shows in the photos. I ask myself these questions: Is the shutter speed too slow for the available light? Did I mash the shutter button? Did I move or did the wind move me or the camera? Is the subject moving too much for the selected shutter speed? Should I be using auto focus or manual focus? What automatic focus mode should I be using for this particular subject?Once I figure out what I should be using for a given situation and how, I get sharp photos.This camera has a steep learning curve. Time and effort invested into learning how to use this equipment is a must. Knowing basic photography is an absolute necessity. This camera won't do all the work for the user. Highly recommended.Paste this in and check out the sharpness:flickr.com/photos/gbheroncat/sets/72157626561217164/comments/#comment72157626436614683Note: These are boring photos--my goal was to get the sharpest images that I could.

If you happen to be shopping around for an APS-C format camera and this falls within your budget, look no further and get the D7000. For a crop-sensor camera, Nikon is pushing the boundaries by including more features while maintaining great performance. If a full-frame camera is out-of-reach or is not what you're looking for, the D7000 is the next best thing. Great low-noise performance up to 1600 ISO; still really clean pictures. You can still get good shots past 1600, but as expected the noise will start creeping in. There's mirror lock-up for long exposures. Intervalometer for time-lapses or star trails. Weather-proof magnesium-alloy body feels great and let's you think about one less thing when shooting outdoors. Solid yet compact body compared to the bulkier full-framed cameras; compact yet solid compared to plasticky entry-level cameras. 39 auto-focus points provide more than enough spots to place your subject exactly where you want. Commander mode for off-camera flash. AND it shoots 1080 HD video.You might say I'm just listing specs on the camera. But that's the great thing about the Nikon D7000. ALL of it is in one package. Going through the process of selecting a camera, you do the meticulous research on everything that is available. Slowly weed things out: budget, lens selection, features, customer reviews, sensor noise, etc. I was teetering on the edge of the the Nikon D90, a tried and true mid-level camera, and the Canon T2i, the new mid-level camera with the HD video flair to it. Then you go into the product comparison where you develop two checklists: the first checklist are all the requirements that your camera should have; the second checklist are all the features that you want, but could live without. Once the Nikon D7000 specs were officially announced, both checklists went out the window and I made the purchase.Having parted with my hard-earned cash, I am very satisfied with the camera.

After downgrading from a D700 to the D7000, I expected a bigger drop in quality. It is a very nice camera for the price, not too light, not too small, feels good in your hands. I use FX lenses on it, and I have to say that I didn`t regret downgrading. My only problem with it is that pictures taken at ISO 400 or higher are too noisy to my taste, but with a tripod, a speedlight or a bit more experience, you can overcome these obstacles. In brief, it is a very good value camera.

I purchased two separate D7000 bodies from Amazon and I had issues with both when it came down to focus issues at close range. Both bodies were tested both with charts and against my D700 and D300s(both of which I know are tack sharp when it comes to focal points) using 24mm 1.4G, 50 1.4G, 85 1.4G and the 105 2.8 Macro. It's a shame because I love the video aspect of this camera but alas I could not justify the cost for a video based body only. 3 stars for the video end.

I was a big film fanatic all this years because I never liked how digital rendered colors and handled highlights. D7000 is exceptional in this case, especially if you process RAW files in Aperture 3 and turn on extended mode in Curves. I can't comment on JPEGs because I never shoot them, but RAW files are fantastic.Another brilliant things is high ISO performance, there is literally no noise at any settings. There is a grain but film also has grain and I do not care about it, but there are no blue/violet pixels even on ISO 6400 photos shot at candle light.I also have huge amount fo old Nikon lenses and ability to use them was a big plus for me, D7000 can meter all lenses made by Nikn or for Nikon from 1959 and above. As for metering, it DOES NOT overexpose!!! At least in RAW files, none of my RAW files have pure white pixels. But because in camera JPEG processor is not as smart as you, it can make overexposed JPEGs as a result. That's because JPEGs have 256 shades of each color and raw has 16384.In my opinion D7000 is absolutely best crop sensor camera ever made by any manufactor.

This is the second Nikon D-srl camera I have bought in the last year. I bought the D3100 last September after much deliberation between the D3100 and D7000. I chose the D3100, since it was going to be my first D-srl camrea, because of the ease of use. I was greatly please with my purchase but, I quickly out grew the camera. I mostly shoot sports and fast action photography so the D3100 put to many limts because of the low FPS. I got my D7000 about a month ago, and I have loved using it.Above I explained my chose between the D3100 and D7000 for the following reason. I have read may reviews talking about the bad focus of the D7000 and other issues along the this line. I feel that some people maybe having these issues because they got to much camera to fast. My experience with the simplier D3100 really helped me to be able to use my D7000 to its fulliest.I love this camera. I think if you are looking to upgrade from a beginner D-srl camera then just buy this one and stopping looking. If you are looking at this for your first D-srl, then I would suggest to get the D3100 or D5100 and then upgrade when you feel that you have out grown that camera.

I was a newspaper photographer for 20 years and was very reluctant to move to digital. I had a few decent digital cameras, but nothing worked as easily and instinctively as my old 35mm units. This camera has the feel of a 35mm and works almost as easily. I recommended "D7000 For Dummies" as a companion piece. I qualify as a dummie in this regard so the book really helped - more than the manual that came with the camera.

for a while I thought that my copy of my D7000 has issues with back focus like others experienced. I am still working on how to use the D7000 coming from D40. A lot to learn with it which I think it will take few months to master it. It is way fast than d40. I tried using the kit lens ( 18-55mm NON-VR) lens of d40 and it works perfectly. It is still highly recommended, just need more time and familiarization. Goodluck! Always watch Amazon and look for the " In-Stock". This is a hot item. ^_^

Prevailing opinion may say that you should put your money in "glass" (lenses) and not in the camera body, but I don't think this is as true in our digital age. I owned the D-90 for over a year and it is a great camera, but when I put the same lenses on the D-7000 I get more depth of color, sharper images, and in general better pictures. There are so many good reviews of the technical aspects of the camera, that I will just go over the things that I particularly like. The build and feel of the camera is solid and the using the viewfinder is a delight. The video control buttons were improved and make it easier to use with less fiddling around. Having two SD cards is a treat, I use one for Video and overflow and the other for pictures. I loved all the buttons and settings on the D-90 but invariably I would put the camera down and then the next time I used it not remember that I had changed something -- now you can save your settings, two sets of them, so that you can start with known settings. And finally, the scene mode gives you a preview of the scene you are choosing, and in the touch up section menu, you have many ways to enhance your images including making wonderful color sketches -- it's fun sometimes to use these quick touch up enhancements, download to your computer or ipad and just mail them off to folks. Just a great camera, the price is high, but in so many ways well worth it.

I had a Nikon D40 which I used for about two years and was very satisfied with it. However, like others, I have outgrown it and wanted a better and challenging replacement and thus came the D7000 in the picture. I ordered said model on Amazon and received it in June. During usage, I noticed that the pictures I have taken were either soft or out of focus. I played with it further using my other lenses and it was still hit and miss with this particular camera.I decided to contact Amazon and advised them I would like to return the camera and get a replacement. I would like to commend Amazon on this because they still honored my request considering I was over the allowed grace period for return (a week over). Anyway, after a week, I received the new replacement and right away put it to use. Low and behold, this one works like a charm, focus is superbly sharp and spot-on. Unlike the previous one where it seemed to focus on subject it would like to. There is an obvious quality control issue related with this model but since I received a replacement that works great as advertised, I am a happy camper.I LOVE THIS CAMERA!!!

Of course its a great camera for still. There are so many review about the still capability already. But the controlls of the video is OK but could be better.I played with the Nikon d7000 video a little. I even bought a Steadicam Jr for it. It took me a couple day to figure out I had to make an adapter plate to make the Steadicam work. I added a quick release so I can use the camera on the Steadicam Jr and take the camera off quickly. Here is my observation of the using nikon D7000 for video.1) There is no remote start/stop to turn the video on and off to be use on the steadicam Jr or similar stabilizer. I have to catch the "floating" camera on the Steadicam Jr to turn the recording on and off. So a time delay or remote switch to turn on the video is impossible?2) The D7000 camera is very "rear" heavy to compare with a "normal" camcorder. I made an adapter plate to allow the d7000 to work on the Steadicam Jr. Once the adapter plate is installed the Steadicam Jr works fine.3) There is no motorized zoom on the D7000 and zooming is not going to be smooth. It is almost impossible not to stop the recording on the Steadicam Jr to zoom.4) The built-in microphone is so close to the lens, it is picking up the noise of the lens motor when auto focusing is in action. I am using a old zoom 24-120mm without the silent wave motor. Other lense could be better.5) I also bought the IR remote controller, however, it will only control the shutter, it will not start/stop of the video remotely.6) No through the lens view finder to see the video means it is difficult if not impossible to take video under bright sun light.Still a great camera for occasional video recording for vacation.

Short and sweet, I've owned four Nikon DSLRs, the D70, D80, D90 and a D200 and now the D7000, this camera helps me make outstanding pictures, better than any other camera I've owned. I am astounded with the low light, high ISO capability, this camera works so hard for you in the most difficult conditions to make great shots. On one of my first outings with this camera, I had it set at 6400 ISO and didn't realize it and was out all day shooting... the pictures were spectacular, even when you aren't thinking of your shot, this camera will compensate for you.The image sensor is amazing, the response of the shutter button like lightening, the auto-focus system is mystically accurate ... there is little to complain about with this camera.If you are thinking about a replacement DSLR or upgrading, this is the top of the line pro-sumer camera, the next best rig is the D700, at more than twice the price.One more feature that I bought this camera for is it's video capability. It is a big improvement over the D90 and others. The D7000 will shoot in auto-focusing HD and in stereo ... very nice quality for the average user... I've videod weddings with it and am quite pleased with the results, but don't take my word for it, here's my YouTube link:[...]I have 50,000 hits, all thumbs up, so it's not just my opinion, people love the results.You will be very pleased with this camera, buy it!!! Life is short...

I knew my D200 bodies (and shared D300) were history as soon as I read the spec sheet on this one. While the resolution increase isn't huge, it will give you more room for cropping later and making slightly larger prints. But the features that sold me were the high ISO performance, 14bit raw captures and dual card slots (even if they're SD).The high ISO performance has not disappointed. 1600 ISO doesn't look a lot noisier than 400 ISO on the D200. And true to their promise, shots at 6400 ISO are usable, so long as you don't get carried away in the size of your prints or display.Likewise, the 6 fps frame rate seems pretty well on target in real world shooting. There are faster cameras in Nikon's stable, but none come to mind at this price point.The dual card slots are great, even if they have me selling off my compact flash cards. I purchased two 16GB class 10 cards by Transcend here on Amazon: they appear to be up to both shooting stills and HD video. The camera allows you to set up the cards for overflow, backup or separate by file type. Very nice.This camera is much closer to the D90 than the D300 in terms of size and configuration - I'll be ordering the battery grip to beef it up a bit - I've got good size hands and it feels a little dinky, despite the metal frame.If I had FX (full frame) Nikon glass, or was shooting a D300S, I'm not sure the purchase would have been worth it. But despite where Nikon positioned it in their lineup, this is an upgrade to any other DX body including the D300S in some ways, and is a bargain at it's current price of $1,200, in my opinion.While it's handy to be able to shoot video, and the full-time focus seems to work well, the focus motor from your camera/lens will make a lot of noise unless you're using a remote microphone. My much cheaper video camera will still get the call if I'm specifically shooting video.

Ive owned this beauty for a few months now and the difference is HUGE compared to my prior D80. the complements rolled in once my portfolio was updated with images from this body. Its hefty and has a million more things to offer. Images are spectacular and videos as well, soo smooth! The double decker function wheel is my favorite. you can easily switch your shutter to quiet mode when you dont want to disturb others. I'm considering buying a second D7000 body to keep as a spare for my wedding work and fully retiring my D80 to purely leisure work.

...to get low-light performance like this. I'd spent a lot of money on fast lenses but my D80 just wasn't taking the photos I wanted--too much noise and grain in low light. I'd done my research and thought that the answer was to get a larger sensor. I specifically expected to need a larger sensor and lower pixel count, to maximize the size of each light well. So when my wife asked for the D7000, which has the same size sensor and MORE pixels, I thought I would be really disappointed.To put it briefly: I'm not. At all. I'm taking natural light photos in dim conditions and loving the results, even with the crappy kit lens! Seriously, I crank this up to ISO 1000 and it's pristine. Even at 1600 and 3200 it's beautiful. It blows my five-year-old D80 out of the water without half trying. I guess sensor technology has really improved.Better yet, it has more features than the D80. Live View alone is worth the price of admission. Then throw in a much nicer rear display, lighter but stronger body, and faster processing... wow. Oh, and did I mention HD video? With real lenses, instead of the crap you get with most digital camcorders? The only thing it's missing is a GPS, and there's an input for that.I'm still saving up for that full-frame camera, some day. But right now the D7000 is doing everything I want.

I bought this camera a few months ago as an upgrade to my D90. I haven't had any issues at all with mine and like it a lot. If you're a Nikon shooter and want to shoot DX format, this camera is the best option in my opinion. I prefer the smaller body size since I'm a woman, but with a grip, it should feel more comfortable for those with larger hands. Overall, I would recommend this camera to anyone.

I have had this camera now for four months, 30,000 images, trips to Alaska and California. I feel this is Nikon's best DX camera and Nikon's best camera for the money. My D3X is much less often used. I really like the images from the D7000 and I like the way it handles. Two problems: the mode switch turns too easily, can be inadvertently rotated - check it often! The buffer is small. I shoot only raw images and the buffer holds about 10 images. A fast SDHC card mitigates this issue.I highly recommend this camera.

I upgraded from the Nikon D40....Wow! I can't believe how good this camera takes pictures. I am having fun learning all the neat features this camera offers. I actually purchased the Nikon D5100 from the local camera shop and returned it 2 days later after reading reviews on the D7000. I also went with the D7000 because of the ability to purchase older lenses on Ebay at great pricing; seeing the D7000 works with lenses with or without onboard lens motors. I was able to purchase a push pull 80-200mm 2.8 lens for $560.00 and I can tell you the pictures are incredible. The clarity of the pictures are stunning. If you are struggling with stepping up to this camera vs the D3100 or D5100 save your money and you'll save money on lenses. Some of the old Nikon lenses are great; look at the 50mm 1.8 none motor lens only around $100 on Amazon new while the motor lens of the same is over $200. It makes getting this camera an easy choice; although all Nikon DSLR's are great it just came down to lens choice for me.