Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D5300 Body

Возникли проблемы с видоискатель. Амазон попросил связаться с производителем

Камера работает нормально от 2-х лет, но зарядное устройство не было хорошо

I own Nikon's D800 and wouldn't part with it for the world. However, for travel the 800 is a bit of a handful. Still, the brilliant quality of the camera's end results almost justified the heft and weight of the unit. So, it was with some surprise that I discovered the D5300.With 24 megapixels, right out of the box anyone can capture fantastic images. The camera shoots quite well in Auto mode (both auto and auto with no flash). But I shoot in Manual and here is where the D5300 had to prove that it was no slouch in the DSLR arena.I'll admit, it was a bit of a hassle with the way Nikon organized the controls. The aperture (F stop) wheel is now a two step process that took a bit to get use to. The wheel is shared with the Shutter Speed wheel (and you use an additional button to change the aperture opening). Also, you have to use the screen (quite a large one) to change the ISO (formerly ASA) speed and if you want to control the white balance, etc. Again, this is a minor irritation but the layout of the land is not up to Nikon's usual perfection.Once I got past these minor obstacles, the camera came into its own and quite easily met and, in some cases, surpassed a number of tests and criterias. For my concerns, it was impossibly light (around 5 pounds with the 18-140 lens) but didn't feel tinny or cheaply made. The view finder is a good size and the shooting button is the same as on most models. In AUTO mode (there is also an AUTO - NO FLASH) the camera quickly and quietly goes through it paces. Sometimes, on vacation and especially on a tour with a group, you just do not have the precious moments to adjust the various settings. So, although a pro does not use the automatic settings frequently, it is still nice to know that they work when warranted.In Manual, once I got past the one wheel for two jobs glitch, it is a fairly easy and straightforward camera to use. In direct sunlight (with the WB set as such), the D5300 provided me with brilliant photos. In JPEG mode they were equal, at least to most viewers, to the ones taken with the D800 - yes, they are that good. Like all cameras (not just Nikon) the light meter built into the system is a bit off and should only be used as a guide line. Also, the flash (in Auto mode) had the strange habit of wanting to pop up and fire off during conditions when it was not needed (at an ISO of 100 - my usual shooting speed for bright sunlight - and with an aperture of f10 and a shutter speed of 1/80th), it felt the need to shoot off the flash. A minor irritation and, as you can control the flash, one that did not cause me much concern.The lack of a star is for a dual problem that I encountered. Many have already negatively commented on the weak to nonexistent GPS feature. I chose the D5300 hoping to utilize that feature. In foreign travels especially, it is nice to be able to have your photos saved with location data. Travelling within big cities is fine but when you go outside of the major areas, it is a necessity to be able to recall where you might have stopped for a moment but captured a fantastic picture. The D5300's GPS seldom works. Even stranger, it will work for one photo but, when I stepped a few feet away, reset the cameras f stop and shutter speed, it did not record the data. I generally leave the camera on while planning to take shots so I do not understand why it is not picking up the signal. Again, that is a minor aggravation.What is not minor is the D5300's problem with RAW mode. I like to shoot in RAW and edit the .NEF files using PICASA 3. No dice. If I use anything other than the viewfinder or Nikon's VIEW NX2 (make sure you update the program if you have an older version), RAW photos are displayed as washed out with a purple tint. Yet the NX2 program displays them as vivid and perfect. If you want to edit the picture (even cropping it), then you are out of luck. I'm sure it is a glitch that could be fixed but that, and the spotty GPS system, seem to have been forgotten by Nikon.But what you do have makes up for the few problem areas - the lens (especially the 18 to 140) are light and produce clear and crisp pictures. You can capture any spot imaginable; it is that versatile. The Nikon quality is evident and anyone - from novice to semi-pro, can pick up this camera and take brilliant photos.The price is steep but you certainly get what you pay for and with a Nikon, you are paying for, and getting, the best on the market.

Really impressed so far. I had an SLR years ago in film days, and very much enjoyed using it. It was broken and for years I simply used point & shoots, eventually moving into digital with an HP 1.5 mp. I moved up through point & shoots and started getting back to the context of framing a picture and the art of photography--especially once I started hiking in our beautiful area mountains a few years ago.I had a 4 mp Kodak at the time, great little camera by the way that taught me the value of good glass-I still have it, but found I wanted to move up to newer and better technology. So, after considerable research, I purchased my Nikon L120. Very satisified, and great pictures, but I found in the last several months I wanted the versatility, options and creativity a dSLR would offer. Yeah, Now there's an expense, right? And here was someone who knew not much about them, having forgotten what she knew in the manual, film days. I have friends who will lay their lives on their Canon's and not as many who would for their Nikons (and possibly might offer their Canon friends as sacrifices, too) )-not that they aren't loyal to, and love their Nikon, there's just fewer of them. From earlier research I liked the image quality of Nikons just a bit better, but still when you're spending a chunk of cash, and if you're like me and are far, far from the top 3%, you want to make sure you're getting a good product, and a reasonably user friendly one for your money.So after considerable research, comparisons (to Canon), scrutinizing images for Canon & Nikons D3200, D5100, D5200, D5300, albeit not many with the 5300 since it was relatively new, and reading reviews here on Amazon (one of the best resources in my opinion, and '7's is a wonderful string with loads of interaction and advice) I started leaning towards the D5300 opposed to the other models, and finally due the reviews and 7's advice, I plunged and bought the D5300 with the 18-55 mm lens--the red one, of course.I love it! I was a little frustrated at first with all the menus's and options. It seemed overwhelming, but refer to the manual, buy a book to supplement ( I ended up buying 2), come here and read and just play with it. As you start experimenting with it and changing settings and modes, it gets less confusing and not as complicated as it felt at first. And it has auto modes, so it's not like you can't get great shots from the start while you learn.One of the things I found, is change your picture quality to fine, it will bring an incredible, realistic feel to your photo's. Images of my cat, a tortoise shell are fantastic, capturing the depth, clarity and colors in her eyes and the contrasts in her fur giving a very living feel to the picture--not to mention the disdainful look she's giving the dog is very clear. Photo's I took of my neighbor picked up the green flecks in his blue eyes, the lines, whiskers and age spots in his skin, making them look very lifelike. Captured him exactly, and with a sharper depth than normally in a photo.Some have noted difficulty with action shots. I haven't done much, but shots of my granddaughters jumping & goofing around captured them in mid air and did a nice job freezing the action. I also snapped some shots of my dog and his fur friends running outside, and captured hair and ears flying as they ran in different modes--Sport and pet, and I'm pretty sure some were in auto. I'm excited to take it out this summer to sporting and action events and see what I can get. I'm optimistic--if it can capture a flying, shaggy Shih-tzu, it's looking positive.I've noticed the single focus setting on auto doesn't stay put if you change modes and back, but as far as skewing the image, I'm not really seeing anything discernible or problematic. If you're taking a picture of a moving object, you won't want it fixed anyway. To me the wandering (and by that I mean it isn't fixed to a central single spot, not that it's randomly floating around) focus point is a little distracting when not fixed to a single point, but that's just me being over aware of it at the moment, I'm focusing on not focusing on it. Not a dealbreaker.I'm picky about image quality and I'm very satisfied with what I've gotten, As I become more familiar with various settings, I'm very much enjoying playing with it and look forward to learning more about a DSLR and what you can do with it. This is a perfect camera for it, and I absolutely recommend it to anyone stepping up to the dSLR universe.

I've owned every "compact-format" Nikon from the D60 to the D5000, D5100, D5200, and now D5300. And while my D5200 is less than a year old, I chose to upgrade to the D5300 for two reasons: convenience (built-in WiFi and GPS removes 2 devices I had to carry / attach) and improved video (60fps). I chose the new grey body which is a nice departure from the traditional black, although the glossy finish is a bit of a fingerprint magnet around the back of the articulating display. Luckily, the rubber grips are still in place around the rest of the body.What I didn't expect from the D5300, but actually blew me away was the stunning improvement in image quality over my D5200. First, and some would say finally, Nikon appears to have dramatically improved the auto white balance for incandescent lighting. Secondly, in side-by-side comparisons with the same lenses, focal distances, and shots, the D5300 shows dramatic improvement in image sharpness over my D5200. I'm not sure this can be attributed only to the lack of a anti-alias filter on the sensor, especially when using my Nikon 16-85VR (F3.5-5.6). But when viewed at 100%, the photos are dramatically sharper in both RAW and JPEG versions on the D5300 over the D5200. Given the dramatic improvement in image quality that the D5200 brought over my D5100, I wasn't expecting such a marked improvement that the D5300 brings. Although the D5300 boasts a higher ISO range than the D5200, I haven't noticed a dramatic improvement in low-light performance (the D5200 was already outstanding).Other notable improvements from the D5200:- new 24.2MP image sensor without anti-alias filter- higher ISO sensitivity (100-12800) and low light performance- new larger 3.2" articulating display is also much brighter, although still not a touch screen like others offer- built in WiFi is much more reliable and faster with my iPhone than the Nikon WiFi dongle I used with my D5200- built in GPS, although I found it slow (several minutes) to acquire a lock outdoors- autofocus time in LiveView is noticeably faster, but sadly Nikon still relies on contrast detection so focus is slow- video can now be captured in 1080P resolution at 60 frames per second- slightly smaller and lighter camera body, without (in my experience) sacrificing handling- higher capacity battery (EN-EL14a) provides 600 CIPA shots per charge vs 500 on the D5200/EN-EL14 (but if you turn on GPS and WiFi, the battery drains much faster)And, if you're upgrading from a D5100, the D5300 carries over these improvements from the D5200:- dramatic focus improvement: 39-point AF, 9 cross-type AF points, and 3D focus tracking- Nikon EXPEED 4 image processing engine- 5 fps continuous shooting (JPEG); if you're shooting RAW you can shoot up to 6 images at 5 fps- stunning HD video capture, including live output of uncompressed video through the mini HDMI port- built in stereo microphones for video captureIf you own a D5100, the new autofocus system (taken from the higher-end Nikon DSLRs such as the D7000) is stunning. With 39 autofocus points, it quickly identifies the subject and locks focus. With my D5100, I had some instances of out-of-focus shots (especially in low-contrast subjects or greater distance). With the D5200 and now D5300, focus has been perfect for every shot.So what could be improved? The GPS sadly disappoints. Given how horrible the reviews are of Nikon's external GPS unit, I wasn't expecting much from the built-in unit. But even outside, it takes several MINUTES to get a GPS lock. And when you switch off the camera, the GPS doesn't keep its last position, so it must hunt AGAIN when you power on. I have read that there are workarounds (you can manually download GPS assist data but you have to keep it up to date every 7 days) to improve performance of the built-in GPS.As I mentioned earlier, LiveView focus performance, although notably improved with the D5300, still disappoints. Nikon is one of the last camera manufacturers to rely only on contrast detection for live autofocus. So while the articulating screen is great, don't expect to capture an action shot in LiveView.Finally, while the display is greatly improved in brightness and clarity over the D5200/D5100, it does not support touch, which can be useful for choosing focus points for example.Also important to note is that some Sigma lenses are incompatible with the D5300 (no autofocus in LiveView, no optical image stabilization). Sigma has issued an advisory, and has said they will correct these problems in a forthcoming firmware update. But Sigma is not issuing updated firmware for discontinued lenses.That being said, the negatives are easy to overlook when you consider the stunning image quality, autofocus and scene detection, shooting performance, and HD video capture. Taken together, Nikon has a real winner in the D5300. It is definitely for their target buyer - someone like me who is not a professional photographer but who demands top image quality without taking up a

Карты памяти не хватает, так что мне пришлось пойти и приобрести отдельно. Очень плохо!

I got this camera as an upgrade to my beloved D5100 so the bar was pretty high and so this review is often D5100 vs. D5300. I'll be frank. The D5300 outclasses the D5100 so substantially that it has utterly obsoleted the D5100. Ignore those who say that the D5300 merely provides an opportunity to pick up a D5200 or D5100 for a bargain price. No. The D5300 is now the ONLY camera in the Nikon D5xxx line. It has changed the game. Don't bother counting pennies, this camera is underpriced at full price. The fact that I am sincerely comparing images from this $800 camera body to my D800E's images truly says it all.Please allow me to just get into the Pros and Cons:PROS:1) PHENOMENAL IMAGE QUALITY! AT LOW ISO THE D5300'S IMAGES ARE ON PAR WITH THE BEST CAMERAS IN THE WORLD AND THAT IS NO EXAGGERATION WHATSOEVER. I can't believe there is still a debate going on about the efficacy of Anti-Aliasing filter removal. I'm sorry, but the difference is so noticeable there is no debate. And moire was a myth even on the D800E, which I do also own. I guarantee you that you will find more moire in a D5100's or D7000's images than you will on the D5300. Color and saturation from the D5300 are exceptionally good versus ANY camera at any price point. Now, I will still take the D800E's images over the D5300's but it is not at all night & day. They are actually surprisingly close at low ISO.EDIT 2013-12-09: Photographing cats a lot I am catching a little false color on shiny fur. Nothing of concern to me though.2) Focus point spread (area of image with AF sensor coverage) is MUCH greater than in FX ("full-frame" sensor size) cameras. The D5300's AF point coverage extends left-right top-bottom much farther than FX cameras. I would estimate the D5300 covers probably double the area that FX cameras do and this is an ENORMOUS advantage. I always leave my D800E's focus point glued to Center because the AF coverage is only in the center area anyway so why bother with the other 50 AF points when they just don't cover anything? I actually do use my focus points on my D5300 because they cover the frame pretty well. I'd still like to see even more coverage, but vs. the FX bodies, APS-C cameras have a tremendous advantage.3) Minimum shutter speed in Auto ISO now has AUTO setting that adjusts based on focal length! This is SO much better than a fixed shutter speed regardless of lens length.4) Hard to quantify but the HDR images look much nicer than the D5100's and the Extra High setting is intense and beyond the D5100's abilities. I have not been able to verify this but it *appears* as though there is now image alignment for the 2 photos used for the HDR image as my handheld HDR shots nearly never look like 2 images whereas they often did on my D5100 at full or nearly full magnification. HUGE improvement!5) Great-for-DX and pretty-good-versus-FX ISO performance. I'll put this to bed right now; the D800E smokes the D5300 for high ISO performance. Sorry, this is a different league. However, the D5300 substantially outperforms the D5100 at ISO 1600+. The improvement in the D5300 over the D5100 is readily noticeable.6) Much more intuitive i Menu. The D5100's i Menu being J-shaped was ridiculous and totally awkward. I never got used to it after thousands of photos. The D5300's standardized 2-lines-across-the-bottom Nikon style is a drastic improvement.7) GPS! I don't know what Nikon was thinking with that clunky expensive GP-1A. Did anyone ever buy one? The D5300's internal GPS works great and hooks up quickly and I'm big on geotagging so I am super stoked to have this on a REAL camera!EDIT 2013-12-09: I spent a day in the country (wide open clear sky) with this camera outside of my normal metro town area and despite using A-GPS data, it took somewhere between 30-60 minutes to get GPS lock. Surprised, disappointed. But that was the only time I have had trouble with hookup.8) Nikon's had truly exceptional built-in flash performance since at least the D90. The D5300 does not disappoint and bests or matches its predecessors at any price point. This could be a result of image processing more than flash performance but whatever it is, using flash is a joy, not something to dread.9) The red body paint color is super-gorgeous! It's like a candy apple red Corvette color and it is way sexy.10) The new bigger, higher-pixel screen is REALLY nice. It is not insignificant like many reviewers dismiss it as. I like it a LOT. :)11) EN-EL14a battery with 19.4% more capacity is a nice treat and helpful when running GPS and/or the silly WiFi. I have not spent a full day shooting hundreds of photos with the D5300 yet but I have shot perhaps 100 shots in a day with GPS on and flash here and there and a lot of reviewing and in-camera editing and not gotten below 2/3 battery level in a day.EDIT 2013-12-09: GPS was on from about 8:45am to 5:30pm, WiFi was off all day, I shot 362 photos (almost all were 14-bit RAW+Large Basic JPEG so roughly only about 170-190 shutter clic

The primary reason for me to upgrade from Nikon's D5100 to D5300 was new GPS location recording function. A secondary reason was hoping a sharper image without the low pass filter. After a few thousand shoots in a recent trip, I would say it is a reasonable but not necessarily compiling upgrade from the D5100 and probably even less an upgrade from D5200.Pro:* It is slightly lighter than D5100. I like it but others may not.* LCD screen is bigger than D5100.* There is an added single/continues/self-timer selection button. Although the button position could be better, but it is still better than D5100 has go through quick menu to change it.* Day time outdoor image is marginally better with Nikon's 18-200 lens that I use as walk around lens. Night time performance improvements are more significant. Although the "Auto" and "Night scene" modes are still bad for night landscape shoots.* Auto focus under bright light is marginally quicker than D5100 but under dark conditions it still hunts.* LiveView although still sluggish, at least it is much improved over D5100.* Although it includes the new En-EL14A battery, old EN-EL 14 battery still works! This means I can keep my spare batteries.* Wi-Fi function was not important to me but with Nikon's Wireless Mobility Utility I can sync the camera's clock with my phone. This is important for using the phone as GPS logger. The utility also functions as remote with ability to turn Live View on/off.Con:* When I first got the D5300 three days after it was released, the GPS's performance is just awful! Then there was talk about update the camera's GPS file. With the update, the GPS function improved somewhat but there is catch that we the owner need to download and applied new updates every two weeks! Even with the update, it is still near useless in the field! First, even with the update it still take time to lock on satellite signal! To make matter worse is even with the GPS logging function on, the camera will not maintain the lock once it goes to standby mode and upon wake up, it needs to rescan and lock! Further more, even after it locks, any movement can cause it to loose the lock even by just walking a few steps! I even have many shoots just seconds apart without moving and yet the camera still could not maintain the lock! I would say the outdoor shoots managed to get GPS data is only about 50% and one can forget any hope the GPS can track indoor or inside cars.* As the GPS not able to lock quickly not bad enough, it is also not very accurate!! While some pictures that I shoot so far are accurate, most of them are at least 50ft-100ft off and many are even more than 1,000ft off!!* Not only the GPS is close to useless, it also drain battery much quicker! With the GPS on, the battery can be drained with as little as 200-300 shoots! When changing battery with GPS "on", sometimes the GPS came back resumed to "on", but other times it came back as "off"! I found it very frustrating as most of time I need to change battery in a hurry and do not have time to check all the status.* D5300 has an AF assist lamp as the D5100 and it has the same problem. While this lampmay be good for some cases, it is inappropriate for others. The way Nikon implements it is not very flexible. The default setting is have the lamp on all the time for Auto and PASM mode with some pre-programmed scene modes will disable it. The only way for user to turn it on/off for PASM is to go through custom setting menu and it applied to all modes. One cannot program PASM differently that made this function less useful or even annoying.* Wi-Fi function was not important to me but it seems I have to use it for some functions only the wireless utility offers, it matters now and I was surprised to find out it can only be connected to smart devices with either Android or iOS AND with Nikon's Wireless Mobility Utility running. It does not connect to PC or router. It is a two stages job. First to connect the two with Wi-Fi and then start the utility on the smart device. For some Android devices that supports WPS, the connection is secure. Otherwise by using SSID to connect, it is unsecured with SSID broadcast wide open that some one else can possible to connect to the camera.* The wireless utility has a function to use smart device's GPS tag which is very good. But, my test so far seems it will only embedded the tag as picture been transferred from the camera to the device not directly to the SD card in the camera. Although I can understand the logic in view of possible unsecured link, it is another two stages job first to transfer the image to device and then to PC or somewhere else. It also made this function not very practical to use when travelling as the smart devices' memory are much smaller than the SD card and the prolong use of Wi-Fi seems draining the battery quickly.Bottom line is if you overlook the poor GPS performance and need a DSL camera, D5300 is a good choice. If you are like me already own a D5100, i

Потрясающие камеры. Намного лучше, чем Canon быть 700D. Не только по конфигурации, но и по производительности. Действительно отличный продукт. Люблю его.

Очень хороший продукт и отличный и справа время доставки,хорошая упаковка счастлива за товар должны покупать то,

не сделать хорошей сумке его дубликата сумка для Nikon

Отличная Камера. Потрясающее качество изображения. Вы должны использовать ручной режим для съемки. Я также получил обучение фотографа, видео-DVD с Никон 100 год предлагаем.

Nikon DSLR cameras (with an APS-C sensor) have essentially evolved into three different series; D3xxx (Lastest Model the D3300), The D5xxx Series (current model subject of this review, the D5300) and the D7xxx Series (Successors to the the D80/D90 models; Current model is the D7100). Nikon also sells higher end DSLRs with full frame sensors such as the D610 and D800.Although the D3300 and D5300 both use 24MP sensors and similar JPG processing engines, I believe the sensors are manufactured by different companies (Sony and Toshiba respectively). The D7100 has the same sensor as the D5300 but it really has a different audience; the D7100 is heavier, sturdier, many more controls and generally a more professional camera (not to mention several hundred dollars more expensive). The D7100 also has a built in AF motor making it compatible with older lenses that require this in order to autofocus.The D5300 is a bit more costly than the D3300 but I believe the extra cost is worthwhile. The D5300 has bracketing capabilities (exposure, WB, ADL); a DOF preview; a fully articulating LCD; incremental ISO settings between stops (ie ISO 2000, helpful in not using a higher than needed ISO setting). The D3300 has none of these important features. Most importantly, the AWB and color rendition in general is better on the D3300 indoors. It's not all one sided in favor of the D5300 however, besides being less expensive, the D3300 is smaller, lighter and does a bit nicer job rendering accurate colors in natural (ie outdoors) lighting when shooting jpgs.High ISO and Autofocus performance is very, very good. ISO 800 is really indistinguishable from ISO 100. ISO 1600 is also very good with some graininess/noise creeping in. ISO 3200 is usable but there is a definite degradation in image quality. I really do not like shooting past ISO 3200..JPGs are a little soft even after making in-camera adjustments; Shooting Raw and using Nikon's very good Image Editing software can enhance the photos quite a bit. The built in flash is not great; an external speedlight with bounce capabilities is really essential for properly exposed photographs (or alternatively not using a flash at all and shooting at a higher ISO/slower shutter speed). Like all modern DSLRs, 'live view' (LCD framing) can be used in lieu of the viewfinder. However if you regularly prefer Live View to an optical viewfinder, probably the SONY offerings or even a compact system camera (ie the Olympus PEN series) is a better choice. There is no dedicated WB or ISO button (although the FN button can be programmed for one of those or some other functions). There is no touch screen which I do not really care for anyway.The D5300 looks and functions almost identically to the D5200. The biggest difference is the weight, the D5300 is about 20-25% lighter than the the D5200. Color rendition on both cameras are very similar especially shooting RAW. When using a good lens (ie the 35mm f/1.8G), the D5300 is a bit sharper than the D5200 (and even more so than the D3300). However using the kit lens, there is no real difference that I could see.The D5300 equipped with either of the kit lenses is capable of professional quality photography (in the right hands). However for those that want the very best image quality this camera has to offer, would want to use a lens better than either kit lens. The new 18-55mm vr-ii kit lens found on the D3300 is a little better optically and much smaller (when collapsed) and lighter than the older 18-5mm vr kit bundled with the D5300. Consequently if practical, it may be better to purchase the D5300 body and buy the newer kit lens separately. The 18-140mm kit lens is obviously very versatile but rather heavy and not as good optically as even the 18-55mm kit lens (all in one zoom lenses are always a compromise; the older nikon 18-135mm non-vr lens circa 2005 is the best of this genre). The 35mm f/1.8G is only $200 and is very sharp (and light). The Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 (non-vr version with the AF internal motor) is also very good on this camera (and less than $300).I would recommend this camera as an upgrade from the D3100 (or earlier) or D5000, but not necessarily from the D5200 or even the D5100 which are both very similar (although the D5100 has a 16mp sensor and is about 1/2 stop behind in the high ISO dept).This is really a terrific camera. Like all cameras, the most important component is the skill and imagination of the photographer.

Это был либо серого рынка или подделка, никакой гарантии в комплекте коробка серийный номер и камеры не совпадают, возвращается

Камеры это здорово, но будьте осторожны нет ручной
и видимо продавец хочет спасти деревья и предлагает вам скачать и распечатать 108 страничный мануал с сайта Никона

I decided to add my own review which I will continue to update as I have been commenting on the others here. I received the D5300 on Saturday (got the Grey and have to say I really like the subtle color) and have been taking several test photos with my Sigma 18-250 Macro lens that I purchased only a few weeks ago. I noticed that something wasn't right with the stabilization and the live view (I typically never use live view anyway) but initially thought it was the camera. I may change my review to 5 stars once that issue is resolved and I know exactly what is working correctly. Sigma is doing a firmware update on the lenses so I am going to return mine that does not work once the new ones are released which is supposed to happen in a few days. If you purchased this lens and are not able to return it any longer - contact Sigma and they will have you send it in to update the firmware.As far as picture quality (the lens does work with the exception of the two things mentioned) I have been very happy. I do feel like adding a few steps of sharpness helps the images (custom picture settings are available for user to define), but I am wondering now if that may also be the lens issue. I do like the ability to retouch in the camera (straighten is very useful) but I wish the file that was created from the retouch kept the file name sequence of the original file so that the photos would stay in order that they were taken.I was afraid that after moving from the D90 that I would be missing the dedicated controls on the back of the camera, but I actually find that the menu system is pretty intuitive and easy to manage from the LCD. I am a hobby photographer who takes most of my photos on vacations twice a year besides family events and holidays. I have taken several photography classes and I do use most of the controls on the camera to set my shots. I found that having some of the "scene" modes can be a good refresher when you are trying to remember the correct settings for different situations and can actually be a learning tool if you pay attention to the changes that the camera makes for each situation. The lighter weight and smaller size of the D5300 are certainly a plus for me.I was happy that the function button on the front of the camera can be set to control the ISO and works by holding down the button while dialing the thumb wheel which I am familiar with. There is also a dedicated button on the front of the camera to change to burst mode shooting, timer (10 second delay) and remote settings. This button works by pressing and then selecting from the display screen via arrow keys to select. The other button that I frequently use is the exposure compensation which also has a dedicated button on the top right that works via thumbwheel.The wifi setup was a bit confusing only because the instructions were a bit vague. I searched the app store on my Ipad for the Nikon Wireless Mobile Utility and nothing came up. I did a search through Safari and it did bring it up in the Itunes store (probably because it is really an Iphone app). To connect the camera via wifi - after downloading and installing the app - go to the Menu on the camera and select the Setup Menu - Wifi is on the second page of the menu. Choose to enable the Wifi on the camera and the camera will begin to send out an SSID signal. Go to the Ipad/Iphone into the Settings menu and in your Wireless configuration choose to connect to the Nikon SSID. Then open the app and in the top left corner there is an antennae looking icon that you have to click on to get the camera to connect. I was very happy that the camera worked in this manner as it means that if you are in an area where you have no public wifi that you can still transfer photos to the device through the wifi signal that the camera broadcasts. The transfer rate was good considering these are 24 megapixel images and I had no complaints except that the app is designed for the Iphone and it would be nice to have the app designed for the Ipad for better clarity.The one drawback I had initially was trying to get a program to work with my raw files. I did find a way to update my NX2 software (involved searching the internet to find a download as there were no updates listed in the program) and then I realized that my CS5 software will not work with the new camera raw and I may need to upgrade my Lightroom as they did release a beta version that supports these raw files, and the upgrade costs much less than the CS6 upgrade. Rather irritating of Adobe to not offer updates to older software for raw support in my opinion considering the cost of that program. Lightroom has very similar raw editing though and once the raw files are converted I can always open them in CS5 again.I will add to this once I have the lens change and have had some additional time..

Сопутствующие репетитор на DVD не входит в комплект поставки. Пожалуйста, грузите его.

Сайт показывает с кит Никон 5300 кулачок будет иметь объектив 18-55 VRII, но с этим набором у меня основной объектив 18-55 ВР

Получила свою первую цифровую камеру, я сделал несколько снимков. Его добро. Я дам полный комментарий позже

Отличная зеркальная камера для начинающих с большим в фотографии. Функциональность-это хорошо.

Его хорошо для нас начинающих. Его легко использовать и если отличается от канона со временем вы привыкнете к нему, так что если ваш канон сумасшедший, то не беспокойтесь, идти вперед и купить его. Его стоит Бакс. Я купил этот продукт от DL-ритейлеров для ₹36,950.
это единственное, что я, что меня расстроило то, что компания FedEx ребята доставка потребовалось время, чтобы найти мой адрес, но все равно я люблю этот продукт.

У этого зверя на 35к с 18-55 АФП линзы. Очень хорошо упакован Амазонки. Новый продукт со всеми аксессуарами. Потрясающее качество изображения лучших в своем классе. Очень понравилось.

До сих пор найти свой путь вокруг это фантастическая вещь. Взяли несколько быстрых снимков снаружи и какая разница от моего старого канона. Никон, что большой круглый аппарат. Фильм очень ясно. Фотографии отличные, я использую только в формате RAW, поэтому я храню всю информацию дать по краю.

Совершенно фантастическое зрелище. Но я рекомендовал бы идти для D3300, если это ваша первая зеркалка.

как и ожидалось .. отличная камера с WiFi . самая лучшая часть вы можете передавать фотографии и видео для друзей и любимого человека с WiFi соединение