Отзывы о Объектив Fujinon XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ
Где купить Объектив Fujinon XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ
| Fujifilm XC15-45 F3.5-5.6 OIS PZ | Яндекс Маркет | 20 948 ₽ | Посмотреть |
71 отзывов пользователей o Fujinon XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ
Пользовались
Fujinon XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Астрон-1OZDP
24.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Очень качественный kit-овый объектив за такие деньги. Не мёрзнет. Легкий по массе. Высокое качество сборки. Хороший угол обзора.
- - Внутренняя поверхность бленды недостаточно матовая из-за чего возможны переотражения.
Использую с Х-А1. Цвет - серебро.
В отличие от коллеги, у меня нет никаких люфтов.
Для съемки в городе такого объектива вполне достаточно.
Можно перемещаться и постоянно фотографировать зная, что...
В отличие от коллеги, у меня нет никаких люфтов.
Для съемки в городе такого объектива вполне достаточно.
Можно перемещаться и постоянно фотографировать зная, что...
Странник-2XDNE
03.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Вполне достойный объектив за свои деньги, резкий, легкий, удобный. Прогнозируемый результат картинки. При довольно длительной съемки на морозе -15 проблем с фокусировкой...
КиберНаблюдатель-4BGAM
03.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Универсальность, легкий вес.
- - Крышечка плохо держится, поставил от Canon с самодельным шнурком.....
Для походов, домашних съемок...
Странник-8KPYZ
04.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + - Качество стекла
- Цена(по-сравнению с другими объективами от Фьюджи)
- 16mm - - - Опять же- цена за китовый объектив с такой светосилой,
- Небольшой люфт (зум)
- Кольцо зума туговатое (возможно разработается).
Если придираться, то...:
- Пластик
- Не уверенно цепляющаяся крышка объектива (постоянно смотрю слетела или нет, все привязать забываю)
- Не удобное крепление оригинальной бленды, что шла с объективом.
Отзыв возможно придирчивый, но считаю китовый объектив за такую цену можно и покритиковать...
Купил себе на тушку XE-1. Использую для пейзажной...
Купил себе на тушку XE-1. Использую для пейзажной...
Гравитон-6AMWF
05.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Оптика качественная. Для начального уровня самое то!
Аргонавт-9HZRL
03.03.2020
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Компактный, удобный диапазон фокусных расстояний, картинка хорошая для объектива серии kit, слабое искажение изображения на широких углах.
- - Светосилы на 45 мм очень не хватает,...
Астрон-8SHRB
27.12.2020
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Посредсвенная модель
- + Брал с ХТ-30 в качестве китового - вполне хорошее стекло. Потенциал камеры не раскроет, после замены на любой фикс будете приятно удивлены. Внешне и конструктив так себе.
- - Так и не понял, каким образом на XT-30 определять фокусное расстояние. Очень темный. Дешевый пластик (включая...
Гравитон-7MXTN
20.09.2019
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Самые первые впечатления 1 компактный, для путешествий самое то 2 резкий 3 моторный привод зума, прикольно 4 "цветистый" поставил на т10 которым...
Эксопилот-3BVAX
11.11.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + резкий, чёткий. красивая картинка.
- - моторчик для фокуса тут зря.
Работает как мыльничка с рычажком. Но можно менять зум кольцом подстройки если не...
Фотон-8PCTA
06.12.2019
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Главное достоинство размер и вес, что редкость по нынешним временам. Исходя из этого достоинства и нужно оценивать объектив. Если важен именно размер, то придется поступиться детализацией и рисунком. Но размер это не все достоинства объектива. Этот объектив очень тихий, практически бесшумный. Быстрая фокусировка ( с поправкой на то, что у фуджи это не самая сильная сторона) Объектив очень хорошо подходит для съемки видео, как благодаря тихому фокусу и зуму, так и потому, что зум тут не механический и получить плавное зумирование очень просто . Еще одно достоинство проявляется на камерах X-Pro - объектив не перекрывает оптический видоискатель даже в положении длинного фокуса. К достоинствам можно отнести еще цену, хороший и удобный диапазон фокусных расстояний на все случаи жизни.
- - Недостатки объектива являются следствием его достоинств. В первую очередь низкая светосила и совершенно не интересный и не красивый рисунок. Очень плохая детализация и совершенно не впечатляющие цвета. Поскольку зум электрический , то при включении требуется 1-2 секунды на то, что бы из объектива выехал тубус. Электрическим зумом при фотографировнии управлять не удобно - у кольца зума слишком маленький ход. Тактильно объектив тоже не назвать приятным - ощущение дешевого пластика в руках, люфты колец фокусировки и зума. Стабилизатор по нынешним временам...
Спектроник-6XIMF
06.04.2020
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Отличный, легкий объектив. Резкость отличная. Для съемок в путешествиях самое то!
Небулоид-5MJGS
01.03.2021
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Плохая модель
- + конечно ФР - чем шире, тем лучше.
скорость АФ
тихий - - все остальное - медленный, дорогой, с плохими оптическим...
Кронос-2SCXM
26.12.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The Fujinon 16-50mm is bundled with various X mount camera kits but also available to purchase on it's own.
Being an XC lens it doesn't feature the aperture ring of XF Fujinon lenses (aperture is controlled via the camera control dials), and the barrel is devoid of an OIS on/off switch.
Despite being a "kit lens" a few points stand out, firstly the build is somewhat better than most kit offerings with dense more solid feeling plastics used, neither is there a hint of any wobble with the lens extended and the zooming action is smooth from wide to telephoto end. The mount is plastic, the copy I am reviewing came with an X body kit and included a hood, supplied is a push on rear lens cap, and a centre pinch front lens cap.
After testing the lens I've listed out some of the stronger and weaker points of the lens
Good points:
+ Very good sharpness across the focal range in the centre even wide open, at 16mm f3.5 edge performance is very good improving a bit stopping down, very usable at 50mm f5.6 too. Corners are a bit behind the central performance at 24-35mm but still very acceptable wide open.
+ Build is a step up from most kit lenses with decent plastics used in construction
+ Useful focal range offering an equivalent of 24-75mm on a full frame camera
+ Compact size, weight under 200 grams pairs well with some of the smaller "X" series cameras
+ Autofocus is quiet and fast to acquire focus (this will vary on the body being used) no issues with AF to report
+ Effective OIS system means slower lens speed can be compensated to a degree, I'd estimate 3.5-4 stops from the OIS
+ Fairly good out of focus rendering, quite smooth 7 blades rounded aperture
Not so good:
- Cost is high for a lens of this type when bought outside a kit bundle, for the asking price it should really have a metal mount
- Some CA at the wide end edges even with correction (not extreme by any means)
- No aperture ring or OIS switch (both are controlled via the camera body), would prefer a "real rear lens cap"
- Rather mediocre close up performance min focus distance is 0.3m (at the 50mm end) Magnification of 1:6.7 (0.15x)
Notes:
Optical distortion and vignette (darkening of the corners) and most aberrations are corrected in camera and in most common raw converters (the bundled Fuji software and well known products like ACR/Lightroom) In most cases you won't see the effects of this at all even working in raw, but you can if you use some of the lesser well known raw conversion software out there. There is a fair bit of distortion esp wide end being corrected and darkening in the corners, but it's mostly invisible to the user and likely a non issue, but worth a mention anyway just in case you use other software for your raw workflow.
Filter size is 58mm the front element does not rotate on focus or zooming, the lens extends about 3.3cm at the 50mm position
Lens zoom and focus rings are made of the same plastic as the casing
Aperture varies across the focal range the approx. lens speed is as follows:
16mm F3.5
18mm F3.6
20mm F3.8
23mm F4
25mm F4.2
28mm F4.5
30mm F4.7
35mm F5
40mm-50mm F5.6
Lens speed is typical for a lens of this class though the benefit of good OIS and the ISO performance of the X series bodies does dampen the loss of speed somewhat.
There is no focus distance scale on the lens but this shows up on the camera which can be of use. Manual focus is "by wire" thus electronic response fairly good though I would prefer a mechanical focus action (which feels better in my view)
Probably the most interesting aspect of this lens is unlike some other "kit" offerings which usually start at 18mm (roughly 27mm on a 1.5x crop body) The Fuji offers a very nice wide angle equivalent of 24mm which could be of interest for scenic and landscape shooters, with the 50mm taking you up to a normal short telephoto 75mm on a full frame body. The range is without question very appealing even if the lens speed isn't fast. There is quite a difference between an 18mm lens and a 16mm one more than you would expect, the real issue with the lens has less to do with optics but price. I was pleasantly surprised by the lens resolution which is to a level few kit lenses reach, though not perfect this lens is unlikely to disappoint even fussy shooters (it compared well to a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 when I shot both side by side)
The one let down is the max magnification which really is a bit below par compared to other lenses I've used the Fuji can't focus as close as most zoom lenses (the 16-50mm is 0.15x the Tamron 17-50mm can manage 0.22x which is quite acceptable), though it might be adequate for some types of shooting a low cost option would be to add a close up filter to bring the lens cl
Being an XC lens it doesn't feature the aperture ring of XF Fujinon lenses (aperture is controlled via the camera control dials), and the barrel is devoid of an OIS on/off switch.
Despite being a "kit lens" a few points stand out, firstly the build is somewhat better than most kit offerings with dense more solid feeling plastics used, neither is there a hint of any wobble with the lens extended and the zooming action is smooth from wide to telephoto end. The mount is plastic, the copy I am reviewing came with an X body kit and included a hood, supplied is a push on rear lens cap, and a centre pinch front lens cap.
After testing the lens I've listed out some of the stronger and weaker points of the lens
Good points:
+ Very good sharpness across the focal range in the centre even wide open, at 16mm f3.5 edge performance is very good improving a bit stopping down, very usable at 50mm f5.6 too. Corners are a bit behind the central performance at 24-35mm but still very acceptable wide open.
+ Build is a step up from most kit lenses with decent plastics used in construction
+ Useful focal range offering an equivalent of 24-75mm on a full frame camera
+ Compact size, weight under 200 grams pairs well with some of the smaller "X" series cameras
+ Autofocus is quiet and fast to acquire focus (this will vary on the body being used) no issues with AF to report
+ Effective OIS system means slower lens speed can be compensated to a degree, I'd estimate 3.5-4 stops from the OIS
+ Fairly good out of focus rendering, quite smooth 7 blades rounded aperture
Not so good:
- Cost is high for a lens of this type when bought outside a kit bundle, for the asking price it should really have a metal mount
- Some CA at the wide end edges even with correction (not extreme by any means)
- No aperture ring or OIS switch (both are controlled via the camera body), would prefer a "real rear lens cap"
- Rather mediocre close up performance min focus distance is 0.3m (at the 50mm end) Magnification of 1:6.7 (0.15x)
Notes:
Optical distortion and vignette (darkening of the corners) and most aberrations are corrected in camera and in most common raw converters (the bundled Fuji software and well known products like ACR/Lightroom) In most cases you won't see the effects of this at all even working in raw, but you can if you use some of the lesser well known raw conversion software out there. There is a fair bit of distortion esp wide end being corrected and darkening in the corners, but it's mostly invisible to the user and likely a non issue, but worth a mention anyway just in case you use other software for your raw workflow.
Filter size is 58mm the front element does not rotate on focus or zooming, the lens extends about 3.3cm at the 50mm position
Lens zoom and focus rings are made of the same plastic as the casing
Aperture varies across the focal range the approx. lens speed is as follows:
16mm F3.5
18mm F3.6
20mm F3.8
23mm F4
25mm F4.2
28mm F4.5
30mm F4.7
35mm F5
40mm-50mm F5.6
Lens speed is typical for a lens of this class though the benefit of good OIS and the ISO performance of the X series bodies does dampen the loss of speed somewhat.
There is no focus distance scale on the lens but this shows up on the camera which can be of use. Manual focus is "by wire" thus electronic response fairly good though I would prefer a mechanical focus action (which feels better in my view)
Probably the most interesting aspect of this lens is unlike some other "kit" offerings which usually start at 18mm (roughly 27mm on a 1.5x crop body) The Fuji offers a very nice wide angle equivalent of 24mm which could be of interest for scenic and landscape shooters, with the 50mm taking you up to a normal short telephoto 75mm on a full frame body. The range is without question very appealing even if the lens speed isn't fast. There is quite a difference between an 18mm lens and a 16mm one more than you would expect, the real issue with the lens has less to do with optics but price. I was pleasantly surprised by the lens resolution which is to a level few kit lenses reach, though not perfect this lens is unlikely to disappoint even fussy shooters (it compared well to a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 when I shot both side by side)
The one let down is the max magnification which really is a bit below par compared to other lenses I've used the Fuji can't focus as close as most zoom lenses (the 16-50mm is 0.15x the Tamron 17-50mm can manage 0.22x which is quite acceptable), though it might be adequate for some types of shooting a low cost option would be to add a close up filter to bring the lens cl
ТехноНаблюдатель-0JYIL
19.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This "XC" lens is the new kit lens that comes with both the Fuji X-A1 and X-M1 cameras. As soon as you hear the phrase "kit lens," the first thing that crosses your mind is a cheap, throwaway lens that is intended only as a stopgap measure until you invest in "real" lenses.
That may be true for many kit lenses on the market today, but my own experience with this lens (which I have been using with the Fuji X-A1 camera) demonstrates that this is one of the best lenses on the market today in terms of optical quality / cost ratio. If that seems like an exaggeration, you can do some online searching and read other reviews here on Amazon and easily find that this is also the conclusion of many reviewers, including professional photographers with many years of experience with professional camera brands.
This lens is part of Fuji's X-mount system. The "XC" line of lenses are cost-reduced lenses of Fuji's highly regarded "XF" lens line (both are X-mount). It is true that the "XF" lenses, which cost approximately twice that of their "XC" equivalent, are some of the most highly regarded lenses available today, but my own experience shooting with this "XC" variant is extremely positive. So much so, that, if you purchase, say the Fuji X-A1 camera with this kit lens, it may be all you will ever want in a basic camera, assuming you can live with the 3x zoom range.
What makes this lens so nice? It is generally sharp across the entire zoom range, with some softness at the outer field of view. Distortion control is handled through the Fuji camera post processing, and is likely not to even be experienced in most shooting situations. In practical terms, there is so little resultant distortion that it starts to make you wonder why the major camera manufacturers seem to have some difficulty in making decent kit lenses and for controlling distortion in-camera. The lens is physically VERY light due to it's plastic construction. But it exhibits a relatively smooth operation (although its not that silky smooth zoom you'll feel in most of Fuji's XF lenses). Focusing is almost completely silent. Without exaggeration, the pairing of this lens with the X-A1 camera knocks off shots that many people might swear were being taken with cameras and lenses three times their price (some have said that the Fuji "XF" lenses are about as good as the Leica equivalents than cost ten times the Fuji prices, and this "XC" lens is not optically that far from the "XF" performance, it would seem.)
If you haven't looked into Fuji yet, which I had myself had not done until late in 2013, these lenses and cameras deserve a close look before you make a next major camera purchase. They are superb performers at very reasonable prices. It's a forward-looking system that is pushing the mirrorless camera segment forward in ways that caught most people completely by surprise.
Plusses of the Fuji XC 16-50mm lens:
________________________________
++ Extremely sharp across the entire zoom range (some softness at outer field of view when not stopped down)
++ Little distortion across the field of view at both wide and zoom ends
++ 16mm wide end means you can shoot much wider than most zoom lens offerings (the closest Fuji "XF" equivalent starts at only 18mm)
++ Nearly silent focusing
++ Very light (only 195g)
++ Relatively smooth mechanical zoom operation (but not the same as the XF lenses)
++ Anti-shake built into the lens
++ Very reasonable cost
Minuses:
_______
-- Poor close focusing ability (30cm at widest zoom; you have to accept this about this lens)
-- All plastic construction not as nice as the metal "XF" line (but, remember, is offered at half the price)
-- No mechanical switch to turn off autofocus or anti-shake (done through the camera's menu system)
-- No mechanical aperture ring (aperture is handled by the camera's menu system)
-- X-mount means that you'll be using that only with Fuji cameras (but is that really a "minus"?)
-- Zoom smoothness not as nice as its "XF" equivalent
-- Zoom range limited to 3x (you can pair this with the Fujifilm 50-230mm Lens lens to pick up where this lens stops, or the Fujifilm XF 55-200mm Lens)
-- 58mm filter size (not a plus or a minus, but means you may need to purchase a new filter for this lens)
I've been extremely impressed with this lens paired with the Fuji X-A1 camera. They together are light, quick, and provide superlative photo quality for a quite low price point. Some say that Fuji is offering the price-reduced XC lenses to later temp follow-on purchases of their rave reviewed "XF" line of lenses. But you may be so happy with the image quality that you get with this lens that it might be all you need.
Related Equipment:
_________________
Fujifilm X-A1 Kit with 16-50mm Lens (Blue)
Fujifilm XC 50-230mm F4.5-6.7 Camera Lens
That may be true for many kit lenses on the market today, but my own experience with this lens (which I have been using with the Fuji X-A1 camera) demonstrates that this is one of the best lenses on the market today in terms of optical quality / cost ratio. If that seems like an exaggeration, you can do some online searching and read other reviews here on Amazon and easily find that this is also the conclusion of many reviewers, including professional photographers with many years of experience with professional camera brands.
This lens is part of Fuji's X-mount system. The "XC" line of lenses are cost-reduced lenses of Fuji's highly regarded "XF" lens line (both are X-mount). It is true that the "XF" lenses, which cost approximately twice that of their "XC" equivalent, are some of the most highly regarded lenses available today, but my own experience shooting with this "XC" variant is extremely positive. So much so, that, if you purchase, say the Fuji X-A1 camera with this kit lens, it may be all you will ever want in a basic camera, assuming you can live with the 3x zoom range.
What makes this lens so nice? It is generally sharp across the entire zoom range, with some softness at the outer field of view. Distortion control is handled through the Fuji camera post processing, and is likely not to even be experienced in most shooting situations. In practical terms, there is so little resultant distortion that it starts to make you wonder why the major camera manufacturers seem to have some difficulty in making decent kit lenses and for controlling distortion in-camera. The lens is physically VERY light due to it's plastic construction. But it exhibits a relatively smooth operation (although its not that silky smooth zoom you'll feel in most of Fuji's XF lenses). Focusing is almost completely silent. Without exaggeration, the pairing of this lens with the X-A1 camera knocks off shots that many people might swear were being taken with cameras and lenses three times their price (some have said that the Fuji "XF" lenses are about as good as the Leica equivalents than cost ten times the Fuji prices, and this "XC" lens is not optically that far from the "XF" performance, it would seem.)
If you haven't looked into Fuji yet, which I had myself had not done until late in 2013, these lenses and cameras deserve a close look before you make a next major camera purchase. They are superb performers at very reasonable prices. It's a forward-looking system that is pushing the mirrorless camera segment forward in ways that caught most people completely by surprise.
Plusses of the Fuji XC 16-50mm lens:
________________________________
++ Extremely sharp across the entire zoom range (some softness at outer field of view when not stopped down)
++ Little distortion across the field of view at both wide and zoom ends
++ 16mm wide end means you can shoot much wider than most zoom lens offerings (the closest Fuji "XF" equivalent starts at only 18mm)
++ Nearly silent focusing
++ Very light (only 195g)
++ Relatively smooth mechanical zoom operation (but not the same as the XF lenses)
++ Anti-shake built into the lens
++ Very reasonable cost
Minuses:
_______
-- Poor close focusing ability (30cm at widest zoom; you have to accept this about this lens)
-- All plastic construction not as nice as the metal "XF" line (but, remember, is offered at half the price)
-- No mechanical switch to turn off autofocus or anti-shake (done through the camera's menu system)
-- No mechanical aperture ring (aperture is handled by the camera's menu system)
-- X-mount means that you'll be using that only with Fuji cameras (but is that really a "minus"?)
-- Zoom smoothness not as nice as its "XF" equivalent
-- Zoom range limited to 3x (you can pair this with the Fujifilm 50-230mm Lens lens to pick up where this lens stops, or the Fujifilm XF 55-200mm Lens)
-- 58mm filter size (not a plus or a minus, but means you may need to purchase a new filter for this lens)
I've been extremely impressed with this lens paired with the Fuji X-A1 camera. They together are light, quick, and provide superlative photo quality for a quite low price point. Some say that Fuji is offering the price-reduced XC lenses to later temp follow-on purchases of their rave reviewed "XF" line of lenses. But you may be so happy with the image quality that you get with this lens that it might be all you need.
Related Equipment:
_________________
Fujifilm X-A1 Kit with 16-50mm Lens (Blue)
Fujifilm XC 50-230mm F4.5-6.7 Camera Lens
Небулоид-7JGLY
19.02.2016
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I won't hesitate to write a very low review here, although the optics itself is quite satisfactory for the price.
Fujinon lenses are quite expensive in general compared to its competitors. However the XC lenses are not as expensive, as most people perhaps know that XC lenses are considered entry level lenses unlike XF lenses.
I was quite happy with the optics itself - this lens is quite sharp, especially if you use good aperture range like F9.0. Optical stabilization is quite impressive as well. When I was shooting on the wide range like 16mm etc, I could go as slow as 1/10 seconds handheld easily with this lens. Fujifilm's mirrrorless cameras don't have in-camera optical stabilization but these lenses' optical stabilization is quite impressive.
So why 1 star only?
It's the MOUNT. THE CHEAP CHEAP FLIMSY PLASTIC THIN MOUNT.
It's so fragile - I was carrying around while this lens is attached to the camera, and it just broke. It's because the plastic mount is made so cheaply and flimsy. And trust me I've had so many Nikon lenses from professional grade full-frame FX lenses to cheap plastic mount DX lenses as well. None of them broke like this. Same for Canon, all range of lenses. That tells me that this lens mount for XC lenses is incredibly weak.
So for that reason, don't buy this lens.
I contacted Fujifilm if they can ever replace this terribly designed mount so that I can either repair and reuse this lens again, or replace it with XF lens mount. Guess what I got? Just ignorance. No answer.
So I'll say this here. I love Fujifilm's colors. I love Fujifilm's mirrorless cameras. They are fantastic. But this lens mount is mal-designed. Don't buy it, it will break so easily. And Fuji will not do anything for you. There you go, waste of money. Go for 18-55mm XF lens instead.
Fujinon lenses are quite expensive in general compared to its competitors. However the XC lenses are not as expensive, as most people perhaps know that XC lenses are considered entry level lenses unlike XF lenses.
I was quite happy with the optics itself - this lens is quite sharp, especially if you use good aperture range like F9.0. Optical stabilization is quite impressive as well. When I was shooting on the wide range like 16mm etc, I could go as slow as 1/10 seconds handheld easily with this lens. Fujifilm's mirrrorless cameras don't have in-camera optical stabilization but these lenses' optical stabilization is quite impressive.
So why 1 star only?
It's the MOUNT. THE CHEAP CHEAP FLIMSY PLASTIC THIN MOUNT.
It's so fragile - I was carrying around while this lens is attached to the camera, and it just broke. It's because the plastic mount is made so cheaply and flimsy. And trust me I've had so many Nikon lenses from professional grade full-frame FX lenses to cheap plastic mount DX lenses as well. None of them broke like this. Same for Canon, all range of lenses. That tells me that this lens mount for XC lenses is incredibly weak.
So for that reason, don't buy this lens.
I contacted Fujifilm if they can ever replace this terribly designed mount so that I can either repair and reuse this lens again, or replace it with XF lens mount. Guess what I got? Just ignorance. No answer.
So I'll say this here. I love Fujifilm's colors. I love Fujifilm's mirrorless cameras. They are fantastic. But this lens mount is mal-designed. Don't buy it, it will break so easily. And Fuji will not do anything for you. There you go, waste of money. Go for 18-55mm XF lens instead.
НоваГость-7FVEM
02.05.2015
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Hi,
I bought a low priced kit, the XE1 with this lens..which saved me $150 over buying with the usual 18-55 lens. I have previously owned and used this lens with an XA1 with pleasing results. So although I would have liked the all-metal, superior construction of the 18-55, the saving is a very useful one to go towards the purchase of the stellar 27mm (which I also previously owned, and deeply regret selling - if you find a "deal" buy the 27, it's almost the best prime Fuji have, in terms of all over sharpness!).
Back to the 16-50...
Pluses: lightweight. 24mm equivalent is highly useable, and great for cityscapes with low distortion. Cost..obviously. Fast to focus (for a Fuji, anyway ;^) ) OIS is pretty good to 2-3 stops. Optically very sound, if not outstanding.
Minuses: plastic..very plastic, feels like a toy, not a quality add-on for the beautiful XE1. Optically still second tier to other Fuji lenses, but better - way better! - than the Nikon equivalent. Very bulky compared with, I.e. the Olympus equivalent - a collapsible version would be neat but may lose out optically. Too expensive to buy separately, only worth it as a kit.
All that said, I'm very glad that I have it as an all-rounder alternative to the superb primes. If you are only going to buy one lens, get the 18-55. If you plan to get a couple of primes then this makes a neat starter lens, which is worth keeping if only for that nice 24mm wide end. I'd recommend it, but don't think it will take much heavy wear and tear.
I bought a low priced kit, the XE1 with this lens..which saved me $150 over buying with the usual 18-55 lens. I have previously owned and used this lens with an XA1 with pleasing results. So although I would have liked the all-metal, superior construction of the 18-55, the saving is a very useful one to go towards the purchase of the stellar 27mm (which I also previously owned, and deeply regret selling - if you find a "deal" buy the 27, it's almost the best prime Fuji have, in terms of all over sharpness!).
Back to the 16-50...
Pluses: lightweight. 24mm equivalent is highly useable, and great for cityscapes with low distortion. Cost..obviously. Fast to focus (for a Fuji, anyway ;^) ) OIS is pretty good to 2-3 stops. Optically very sound, if not outstanding.
Minuses: plastic..very plastic, feels like a toy, not a quality add-on for the beautiful XE1. Optically still second tier to other Fuji lenses, but better - way better! - than the Nikon equivalent. Very bulky compared with, I.e. the Olympus equivalent - a collapsible version would be neat but may lose out optically. Too expensive to buy separately, only worth it as a kit.
All that said, I'm very glad that I have it as an all-rounder alternative to the superb primes. If you are only going to buy one lens, get the 18-55. If you plan to get a couple of primes then this makes a neat starter lens, which is worth keeping if only for that nice 24mm wide end. I'd recommend it, but don't think it will take much heavy wear and tear.
Нейрон-7GVPC
03.08.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This is a good kit lens. It's pretty well built. The dials turn smoothly, though the focus-by-wire manual focus feels a little bit disconnected. The image stabilization is good for maybe 3 stops, which is fine. Maybe my copy is not as good as those from other reviewers because I don't see this as anything special. I've shot it on both an X-M1 and a X-E1 against the 18-55. There's no contest. The 18-55 is sharper at all focal lengths and has better color. It also has a manual focus that feels tight. On the plus side I do like the 24mm equivalent focal length on this lens compared to the 28 on the XF Fuji kit lens. That is a focal range where every little bit counts. Compared to most kit lenses the 16-50 is still better than average but not quite as good as some, say, the Panasonic lens that came with the G6. I must disagree with some other reviews. I don't find this superb, simply good. I suppose that if you only have a Canon Rebel kit lens to compare to it might seem better than it is.
When I originally got the X-M1 I was not overwhelmed. I wondered what all the fuss was about Fuji cameras. It turns out that it wasn't the camera that didn't impress me. It was the lens. During Fujifilm's recent lens sale I got the 27mm f/2.8. Now I am impressed. The 27 is much sharper, has better corner sharpness, focuses faster and has a more neutral color. The 16-50 renders scenes a bit warmer than I prefer. Then I got the 60mm macro, which is sharper still. When I got an X-E1 and the higher end kit, I realized that the 16-50 is not Fuji's finest kit lens. OTH, this lens is a lot less expensive than the 18-55 and a lot lighter.
When I originally got the X-M1 I was not overwhelmed. I wondered what all the fuss was about Fuji cameras. It turns out that it wasn't the camera that didn't impress me. It was the lens. During Fujifilm's recent lens sale I got the 27mm f/2.8. Now I am impressed. The 27 is much sharper, has better corner sharpness, focuses faster and has a more neutral color. The 16-50 renders scenes a bit warmer than I prefer. Then I got the 60mm macro, which is sharper still. When I got an X-E1 and the higher end kit, I realized that the 16-50 is not Fuji's finest kit lens. OTH, this lens is a lot less expensive than the 18-55 and a lot lighter.
Кварковец-2QRGG
14.06.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Shipped perfectly in time, included a lens cap, hood, and bottom lens cover...
all of these which I have lost since purchasing and accidentally scratched the lens >.< oops.
However the seller was great! absolutely superb!
I just need to find where I put the stuff....
all of these which I have lost since purchasing and accidentally scratched the lens >.< oops.
However the seller was great! absolutely superb!
I just need to find where I put the stuff....
Квазар-0DAXH
01.11.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I just received this lens today, so I will revise this review when I can. I am using this lens with a Fujifilm X-E1.
I owned the Fujifilm XF 14mm briefly, so that is all I have to compare this XC lens to. The XF 14mm lens is wider, sharper, and all metal. On the downside, the 14mm is heavier, limited to one focal length, and at least 3x the cost at $899. Worst of all, the 14mm has an aperture ring that is so loose that, in my opinion, it becomes a negative rather than a positive.
I actually prefer the absence of an aperture ring on the XC 16-50. The 14mm was difficult to hold without moving the aperture accidentally. And I think the XC-16-50 has a very clean, no-nonsense look about it without the aperture ring. (you just use your right thumb to dial in whatever aperture you want; it works fine. Set the shutter dial to "A" and it goes into aperture priority mode. Shutter priority is activated by using the thumb dial to set the aperture all the way past f22... It will then begin automatically selecting aperture based on whatever shutter speed your select. Leaving the aperture in its auto position, and simultaneously setting the shutter speed dial to "A" puts the camera in Program mode, i.e. automatic mode.)
I don't find the XC 16-50 to be cheap looking or feeling at all. Yes, it is plastic except for the glass, but it still has a nice heft to it that I find actually balances better with the X-E1 than the 14mm did. It is plastic, but it looks and feels nice, and from any distance it is difficult to tell whether it is metal or plastic. The plastic mount is not something I am enthusiastic about, but it seems to work fine.
I know the general consensus is that the XF 18-55 is a better lens, but 18mm (27mm equivalent)is not wide enough for me. The 16mm (24mm equivalent)of the XC 16-50 makes it a satisfactory general purpose lens for me. When the 10-24mm comes out, I'll take a look at that, or if I could get a decent price on a 14mm I wouldn't mind having one again, but not at full price. Fuji should either knock $200 off the price for that defective loose aperture ring of the 14mm, or fix it if they want to charge a premium price for the lens.
I will update this review when I do more shooting with the XC 16-50.
I owned the Fujifilm XF 14mm briefly, so that is all I have to compare this XC lens to. The XF 14mm lens is wider, sharper, and all metal. On the downside, the 14mm is heavier, limited to one focal length, and at least 3x the cost at $899. Worst of all, the 14mm has an aperture ring that is so loose that, in my opinion, it becomes a negative rather than a positive.
I actually prefer the absence of an aperture ring on the XC 16-50. The 14mm was difficult to hold without moving the aperture accidentally. And I think the XC-16-50 has a very clean, no-nonsense look about it without the aperture ring. (you just use your right thumb to dial in whatever aperture you want; it works fine. Set the shutter dial to "A" and it goes into aperture priority mode. Shutter priority is activated by using the thumb dial to set the aperture all the way past f22... It will then begin automatically selecting aperture based on whatever shutter speed your select. Leaving the aperture in its auto position, and simultaneously setting the shutter speed dial to "A" puts the camera in Program mode, i.e. automatic mode.)
I don't find the XC 16-50 to be cheap looking or feeling at all. Yes, it is plastic except for the glass, but it still has a nice heft to it that I find actually balances better with the X-E1 than the 14mm did. It is plastic, but it looks and feels nice, and from any distance it is difficult to tell whether it is metal or plastic. The plastic mount is not something I am enthusiastic about, but it seems to work fine.
I know the general consensus is that the XF 18-55 is a better lens, but 18mm (27mm equivalent)is not wide enough for me. The 16mm (24mm equivalent)of the XC 16-50 makes it a satisfactory general purpose lens for me. When the 10-24mm comes out, I'll take a look at that, or if I could get a decent price on a 14mm I wouldn't mind having one again, but not at full price. Fuji should either knock $200 off the price for that defective loose aperture ring of the 14mm, or fix it if they want to charge a premium price for the lens.
I will update this review when I do more shooting with the XC 16-50.
Эксопилот-7XZYV
11.03.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The Fujifilm Fujinon XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS is a solid option for Fuji shooters looking for a basic zoom lens but the 18-55mm is the better choice for shooting and can be found here: http://amzn.to/1C6c6xq
PROS
+ Very sharp.
+ Useful zoom range.
+ Optically stabilized.
+ Includes hood.
CONS
- Lacks aperture ring.
- Plastic lens mount.
- Narrow aperture.
- Some distortion at 16mm.
PROS
+ Very sharp.
+ Useful zoom range.
+ Optically stabilized.
+ Includes hood.
CONS
- Lacks aperture ring.
- Plastic lens mount.
- Narrow aperture.
- Some distortion at 16mm.
Зета-Орион-4NXVN
22.11.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Compared to Fuji 18-55mm: Advantages are --smaller, significantly lighter, wider (24mm equiv vs 28mm equiv) and substantially less expensive. Disadvantages are may be less sturdy/durable, i8mage quality very slightly poorer but fclkose enough you might not notice.
Compared to non-Fuji (Nikon 18-55 VRII - collapsible with push button). Nearly the same size and weight as the VRII but without the push button hassle. Significantly lighter than the older (non-pushbutton) Nikon 18-55mm's. If published test scores are valid image Fuji quality is better.
Compared to non-Fuji (Nikon 18-55 VRII - collapsible with push button). Nearly the same size and weight as the VRII but without the push button hassle. Significantly lighter than the older (non-pushbutton) Nikon 18-55mm's. If published test scores are valid image Fuji quality is better.
ХроноГость-0TWBP
18.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought my copy of the Fujifilm XC 16-50mm from a seller in Japan, the lens pulled from a camera kit and offered for all of $179.00, with a silver body. I bought it to test a Fuji X-Pro1 body I'd bought used on Ebay, expecting mediocre optical performance enough to judge the camera and then decide to look for better Fuji lenses. To my surprise, trying to disbelieve my eyes, this small, lightweight, plastic body lens is a good rivals with Fuji's FX 18mm prime lens (the only other Fuji lens I have). I haven't studied its longer-end results very much, but am impressed with the wider-end lens performance.
At 16mm, the 16-50mm not only displays less light fall-off at the image margins, but displays better edge resolution than the FX 18mm prime, with only slightly less image contrast. Distortion is variable, depending on which RAW software one uses--Iridient Raw Developer automatically removes distortion and CA and easily fixes light fall-off at the margins. The lens is very sharp. And at f7.1, the 16mm setting is surprisingly sharp right to the foreground image corners. At 18mm, corner resolution is a tad less--but the real value of the lens is that extra 2mm.
It looks like a kit lens--but it doesn't act like one--if you get a good copy.
At 16mm, the 16-50mm not only displays less light fall-off at the image margins, but displays better edge resolution than the FX 18mm prime, with only slightly less image contrast. Distortion is variable, depending on which RAW software one uses--Iridient Raw Developer automatically removes distortion and CA and easily fixes light fall-off at the margins. The lens is very sharp. And at f7.1, the 16mm setting is surprisingly sharp right to the foreground image corners. At 18mm, corner resolution is a tad less--but the real value of the lens is that extra 2mm.
It looks like a kit lens--but it doesn't act like one--if you get a good copy.
Аэронавт-8YQQD
13.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I read many online reviews for lenses for Fujifilm X mount. Almost all of the Fuji lenses are very sharp. Fuji doesn't seem to compromise when it comes to sharpness and optical performance of their lenses. Even the cheapest lens is super sharp! This lens the cheapest of them all but not the least sharp.This lens is sharp at all focal lengths and all apertures. It's slightly sharper than the XF 27mm F 2.8 lens. It's practically weightless when used with any Fuji camera body. Don't think that just because it's a cheap kit lens, it will be so so sharp. Because it is very sharp. Just as sharp as the XF 18-55 F2.8-4 lens but not as well made or not as wide aperture (2.8). But it doesn't cut corners in optical performance/sharpness. It's also sharp around corners, even at F/3.5. For around 200$, it's the best lens you can buy for the money. There is no reason to get other prime lenses for your Fuji camera unless you absolutely need/use larger aperture. I think you will have to spend upto $900 or so for the 23mm/1.4 or other finer Fuji lenses to get images a little bit clearer and sharper.
Показаны отзывы 49-71 из 71.
