Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Fujifilm Instax Mini 12

The lens does not extend to take pictures. The shutter switch is missing.The USB cable is missing. The SD memory card is missing. The batteries were dead. The vendor never checked it out.

I then sent it back via UPS with your amazon's return UPS label. On June 17 UPS picked it up and scanned it into the system. Now UPS says it's lost, and that you or amazon must initiate a package search. Tracking number 1Z602V042628822379.

That was clearly my bad day.

Bob

did as it says and performs well so far. good price and sent in adequate packaging and prompt delivery .

NOTE: Please see Followup at the end of this review.

I've had a Fuji S100 for some time now. My main photographic activity is wildlife, nature and surfing shots, at a minimum of 200 yards. I print at fairly large sizes, usually 16x12 or 20x15in. I've gotten great results with the Fuji, but it has one weak spot (don't we all?): it has a burst of about 3.7fps at full resolution, with a 7-shot limit.

In search of a better burst, I did some research and ended up buying a Sony A550 (body only) and a 28-300mm (42-450mm equivalent) zoom lens. The Sony shoots 5fps (continuous autofocus) or 7 fps (single focus only) with a limit of 24 JPEG "fine" or 116 JPEG "standard" images. Plus the full zoom put me 12% closer to my subjects.

I tested the Sony against the Fuji, to see what else it could do better. After all, on paper the A550 appears superior to the S100. But the results were surprising.
The Sony A550: 14+mp, CMOS sensor, APS-C size.
The Fuji S100: 11+mp, CCD sensor, 2/3" size (less than half the APS-C size).

One test of long-range photographic equipment is to shoot license plates at long range. If a license plate is legible at 300 yards, there will be pretty good detail in a surfing or animal picture taken at the same range. The other factor I consider, besides detail, is the overall smoothness and quality of the final image.

The first thing I noticed is that the Fuji S100 has more manual user control than the A550. So much for the condescending "point and shoot" designation!

At full zoom (400mm equivalent for the Fuji, 450mm equivalent for the Sony), both cameras captured legible license plate numbers at similar distances in the zone between 300-450 yards. But the Fuji created smoother images: both straight and curved lines of objects were smooth, and surrounding foliage was crisp and clear.

I normally shoot at ISO100 in daylight, to keep noise at a minimum. But the Sony A550 has a minimum ISO of 200 (I've been told this indicates that ISO 200 is the optimum setting for the sensor) so I couldn't go below that with the Sony. The Fuji S100 has a minimum setting of 100, so I used that, as I usually do. I didn't see much noise difference between the two cameras at those low ISO levels, but there was some.

The lighting conditions (passing clouds) were a bit irregular--but of course they were irregular for both cameras--and I was trying to adjust to having to shoot at ISO200 and other intrinsic differences in the two cameras, but I'd have to say that all in all the Sony didn't do any better, in terms of IQ and overall picture quality, than the Fuji. Maybe the difference is in the lens quality, but the Sigma lens I was using is generally well-regarded, and in the opinion of some users is better than the comparable Sony lens.

I also compared partial zoom (150mm equivalent) shots of palm trees against a cloud-strewn sky and sea. Here, the results were even more in favor of the Fuji.

Both cameras were set at about the same shutter speed and aperture. In fact the Sony was set a little faster, and the aperture was a little smaller, which should have resulted in less blur and greater depth of field.

Results: the Fuji S100 is much more clear and focused throughout the image. The most distant palm trees in the Sony A550 images were not in clear focus, although trees at an intermediate range (about 75 yards) were. (You might say, well, yeah, it's called depth of field. But at f6.4 at 75 yards, that doesn't seem to be the issue, and in fact the Fuji at a slightly larger aperture had no such problem. And if I stopped down the Sony, I would have to up the ISO again, leading to more noise. In short, the Fuji allowed more flexibility.) This could be a lens problem, and I'm going to try another lens in a couple of days when it arrives. But so far, Fuji wins on sharpness and focus.

The Sony images were really noisy. Because it was late afternoon and cloudy, I had to use ISO400 to keep the picture from being underexposed. (The next lowest choice, ISO200, made it too dark.) I didn't want to shoot slower, because the cameras were hand held. And aperture was limited by the extended zoom lens. At the same time, the Fuji handled the entire situation much better, obtaining adequate exposure at ISO100 and creating images with no visible noise until the image was enlarged to the point where individual pixels began to appear. So as of now, the Fuji S100 wins on noise. And also on ability to get enough light at 1/4 the ISO.

I'm going to give the DSLR another try in the next couple of days; wait for the weather to improve, and try to get some action shots and some breaking waves and see if there is a way to get better pictures. As I've said, I bought the Sony A550 primarily for the faster burst mode and higher burst limit. But I have to ask myself: what's the

Great upgrade to the stock battery that came with my Fujifilm X20.

Does what it says.
- Higher capacity
- Faster charging with provided charger

I may buy a second set, because one can never have too many camera batteries! Especially at a good value.

I really wanted to like this camera. After reading many reviews, I was concerned about the drooping lens and focus issues. The first camera I received was a later serial number but had the drooping lens at full extension. I requested a replacement, which had a tighter lens, but it was an earlier production lot. I found that the auto-focus locked in easily, but the pictures lacked punch and clarity, even when compared to my older Panasonic DMC-FZ28. The range of the lens is fantastic and the it is great having such a smooth zoom action. It is a fairly fast lens, as well, f 2.8-5.6. It worked well in all kinds of lighting, although there was visible noise at 800 ISO and higher. In the end, though, it just didn't work for me.

Are you missing your original charger/battery and afraid to purchase an aftermarket one? Well, don't worry, if you have our luck, the day you receive this, you'll find your original one!

The charger works the same, it doesn't charger the batteries slower or faster. The batteries seem to have the same usage time.

Works with the batteries that I have. I have had three other chargers that have quit. We will see how long this one last.

Would not charge original camera battery (Duracell), only the batteries that were included with the charger. I was buying this as a replacement for the charger that came with camera package and was misplaced. Wary of using batteries that were included with Wasabi charger because of prior reviews.

Have to admit I was slightly cautious about buying this product considering the low cost. Opted to do so after reading the reviews. Arrived on time, well packaged, well made and I found it better than described. Great value for money, does the job better than expected. 100% impressed!

Was a bit concerned about low price and sizing, but it fits my S8400W perfectly, a snug fit padded on all sides and at base (where lens sits), water proof cover is handy and convenient.
Does the job with two pockets for memory cards and batteries inside the lid and a large pouch (vertical zip through the middle) at the front, that's a good place for an instant camera or wallet, though not sure why a horizontal zip wasn't designed there instead, That aside this is a great value case and I recommend it.

NEEDED CHARGER FOR MY CAMERA, AS MISPLACED OTHER, COULD NOT BELIEVE PRICE INCLUDING 2 BATTERIES, WORKS PERFECTLY, VERY PLEASED, VERY QUICK DELIVERY.

The batteries came charged, and I'm 100 shots into the first one without any dropped battery bars or change in performance. The X10 is kinda notorious for getting less than 200 shots per charge, and this battery exceeded my expectations for an aftermarket product. You really can't complain for the price.

I was worried with a brand I wasn't familiar with and it covering so many different style cameras that it might leak in the camera or fry the camera. But it worked! The charge didn't seem to last as long as the fuji battery that came w/the camera, but maybe we shot more movies with it. We bought this as a back up for our fuji xp70 water camera. For the price, I'd buy it again and use it as my back up for sure.

This Fuji is as big and heavy as a DSLR with a medium sized zoom lens. It's saving grace is its excellent image quality all the way from close macro to 624mm (35mm equivalent). I especially like it for wildlife on safari and in national parks. It's sensor is considerably larger than you get with most other super zoom cameras, but still falls short of APS-C. So, in good light it's great and noise only starts to appear when the sun is over the horizon or in darker indoor settings. Fuji has found the perfect compromise for most of my needs.

An awesome package at a great price, Came in as promised,in fact a little earlier. Everything is perfect and works fine.

This is just what I needed for my fuji F20 battery and it does the job of charging it with a red light and green light to show the progress of the charge

Sorry to all of the 5 star reviewers, but it doesn't make my grade. I have a Sony NEX-5N with a 55-210mm lens and wanted a superzoom camera for distant songbird shots. At any distance, this camera cannot produce anywhere near the quality of my present camera. So far, the only way to do that is a very high level DSLR with a very expensive and massive lens. I don't want to carry around that much equipment for an occasional long shot and I will not accept blurry images. When I zoom in on a picture of a bird, I want crisp, sharp feathers and a clear sparkling eyeball. If you don't care about the level of quality, this camera may be acceptable. Very disappointing, but not surprising. I'll keep looking at bridge superzooms as new models are introduced, but I'm not optimistic about any big breakthroughs in their IQ.

works perfectly and the two batteries last longer than the one that came with the camera. they don't drain, or very little, when not in use either. charger is so much bag friendly than the one that came with the camera. and great price!

I've had my Fuji camera for a few years now and the original NP-50 battery has lost a lot of its ability to hold a charge. I was wary of buying a non-Fuji replacement battery and I have never heard of Wasabi before, so I thought I'd write this review to reassure others who may have the same concerns. I've had a great experience with this kit so far and would definitely recommend it to others. The batteries work perfectly in my camera and are totally interchangeable with the original Fuji battery and charger. I recently traveled internationally and they performed wonderfully. Each battery lasted for an entire day of sightseeing and I never had to swap out a dead battery mid-day. The charger came with an international adapter which was very handy on my vacation. I have not used the car charger yet.

Received on time and the product was better than I expected. Immediately solved my problem and all the batteries and charger worked great.

I get between 20-40 minutes more life out of this battery than previous one. I am not sure if that is because that battery is a year old or this is better? After 4 months of use no issues with the battery. I have also never had my camera freeze up on me with the battery. The stock battery the camera will sometimes freeze and require me to pull the battery to reset it. It has never done that with this battery.

It was exactly what I needed. It arrived sooner than I expected. So five stars. No hassle, no wwaiting and no returning.

I wanted something more than a compact, but not the full SLR. This camera seemed to fit the bill.
The problems:
Fuji celluloid film always had a bias towards blues and greens making their film ideal for landscapes with greenery and blue skies. This has been replicated into the bias of this camera, but the digital version of nice Fuji blue/green doesn't translate well. The blues and greens are a little sickly in hue, and actually detract from most photos, even as a sailor with a lot of blue in my photos the blue is too overpowering, as is the green.

Worse than that is the excessive chromatic aberrations that happens when using the video function. I shot hours of film at sea and during tours overland in the Alps. The aberration is so excessive that at times I can see literally about 3 - 5 % of the scene I filmed, there are white and blue lines which erupt from the pinpoints of reflected light on the sea. These lines extend across the entire screen to the extent that nothing is visible at all.
I contact Fuji about this, sent them screen shots of the film, got fobbed off, and escalated the issue to a manager who also agreed that there was nothing that could be done.

So, both camera and customer services have failed to deliver anything near acceptable. Would I buy a Fuji camera again, no never. Do I think the camera has any value - no, because I can never be sure if my subjects will have a sickly blue or green tinge, or even be visible at all if I am filming.

Extremely disappointed and thinking seriously about binning the camera and cutting my losses.

I have had a silver one of these for years and years. I carried it through high school, through a year in Iraq, and it has never failed me. My wife bought me a Canon camera that I took to Iraq with me as well, and it stopped working about a month, and the Fujifilm Z5 took a lickin' and kept on tickin'. The only problem I've noticed is that if something is moving really fast it tends to blur, and it's kind of hard to record decent quality video in low light situations. Overall though, it's a great camera that I hope continues to serve me for many more years to come.