Wi-Fi точка доступа Cisco WAP150 — 45 отзывов, плюсы и минусы

45 отзывов пользователей о Cisco WAP150

Пользовались Cisco WAP150?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

19
11
4
3
8
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Qualität Cisco
Я бегу адаптер за Fritzbox 7390 для подключения аналоговой Tüдверной Звонок и Факс—tes. Легкий и удобный ввод в эксплуатацию, man Rus&mdash может позвонить;t, например, и он читает один, то IP-адрес :-) и все работает как надо. От распаковки до Live 15 минут, и абсолютно надежное—просидел эксплуатации эксплуатации. Супер!
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Также с EWE Tel
Так как я не Фриц!Box использовать, но на телефон функция NGN-разъема я не нашел после некоторых поисков, воздерживаться от этих VOIP-адаптер и заказал.
Мне нужно было только подключить устройство поставленный VOIP-доступ в ЭВЕ внести конфигурации подключение и уже работал.
Я очень доволен!
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Хороший продукт для малого среднего бизнеса.
Хороший продукт. Очень стабильная в работе. Идеально подходит для малого-среднего бизнеса. Мне понравилось, как можно положить один комп администратора и других APs одной и той же модели для обработки более крупных сетей. Настройка портала является немного ограничены, когда осуществляется таким образом.
Profile no image

Астероид-2RUSA

07.02.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

  • + Простота и удобство в настройке. Возможность создания двух независимых Wi-Fi сетей с ограничениями пропускной способности каждой.
  • - Слишком большая и относительно тяжелая, две внешние антенны торчащие как рога. Неудобное крепление к стене, есть некая урезанность в настройках для аппарата такой ценовой категории.
Точка доступа полное разочарование, после полугода использования по видимому сломался один из Wi-Fi модулей. После чего одна сеть постоянно отваливается (в смысле сид сети периодически исчезает и появляется), один раз точка зависала за все время работы. В общем...
источник
Profile no image

Лунатик-4YAQM

14.11.2021

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Очень плохая модель
  • + Ничего
  • - Цена, функционал
источник
Profile no image

Альфа-Юнит-3YZVV

20.09.2020

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Отличная модель
  • + Компактная точка доступа.
    В комплекте идет блок питания (не нашел это в комплектации)
    Использую POE.


  • - Нет...
источник
Profile no image

Аэронавт-4TFDV

23.04.2021

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Отличная модель
  • + Простая и быстрая настройка, Большой функционал для анализа нагрузки, два диапазона WiFi 2/5 ГГц.
  • - При...
источник
Profile no image

Дроид-2RHZB

30.01.2013

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I first jumped on this back in March of 2012. It's fast, and is loaded with "business" features. I was hoping that Cisco was trying to make a pared-down Aironet at a reasonably inexpensive entry-level price for small business that *wasn't* based on a prior Linksys product. And if you look at the management interface (which is pleasant in itself), there are *tons* of great features included.But the firmware is still iffy. I know many people have had problems with -N (I have not) - however, I've had lots of problems with broadcast traffic. I have one at home and at the office; the home version works (mostly) but occasionally just drops access to AirPlay on our Apple TV as well as access to our Sonos wireless music system. I have an old D-Link connected as well - and while it's slower, it is reliable. Rebooting the WAP121 tends to fix these issues for a few days.We had multiple issues with the office unit dropping connections to iOS devices until a firmware update that finally arrived in early Summer, 2012.There's a November version of the firmware which seemed to help a bit with the broadcast traffic at home, but overall I don't think this product is fully baked. I am going to steer clear of consumer-grade or low-end Cisco hardware for a while (and tell our clients the same) - as they don't seem to devote the resources needed to those products to get them working perfectly.(FYI, I run an IT management firm.)
источник
Profile no image

НеоВояжер-6OKEG

17.12.2012

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I have two WAP121 upgraded to the latest FW 1.0,2,3. I am using a Cisco RV4000 Gateway/Router with Comcast internet service. This has worked great for the last 5 years. That is until I decided to upgrade to 802.11 N with Cisco WAP121. Using WAP121 I get an internet download speed around 0,2 - 0.2 Mbit/s and upload speed around 6 Mbit/s. If I connect directly with Ethernet I get 25 Mbit/s down and 6 Mbit/s up. If I download my files from my local server using WAP121 I get 50 - 60 Mbit/s download speed without any problem. After browsing internet I found a solution I found the advice to turn off 802.11 N. With that I get 15 Mbit/S down and 6 Mbit/s up. My setup works fine with my old b/g AP's. It works fine 5Ghz 802.11N AP's. So why is WAP121 not working?Other than this WAP121 works great. The Single Point Setup - Multiple SSID's that can have different VLAN's and different security etc. It is all very useful if you don't need a 802.11N AP that is.I can't help but feeling disappointed that Cisco is releasing a product where the main feature simply don't work. For me the conclusion is that if you are interested in an Wireless - N AP you should look elsewhere until Cisco have fixed this problem.
источник
Profile no image

Дроид-2QHCO

07.09.2012

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I was excited to recieve this product as it had all th features I was looking for with Wireless-N, PoE, and multiple SSID support.My high expectation were quickly brought back to reality when I tried to implement this AP. Initially everything seemed to be working great, and then I tried to access the internet. When loading web pages load times were extremely slow. I ran a couple of different speedtest sites and these all showed download speeds of 1 Mbps or less, while uploads were hitting my ISP's max at 5 Mbps. As this is a newer product from Cisco there was not much information available out there, but found that if the radio was switched to b/g only, and disabled N speeds everything worked fine.The below forum has been active since May with no answers from Cisco on what is causing this issue.[...]While there was a firmware update released at the end of August, it does not resolve any of the Wireless-N issues.Don't buy this product if you are looking for a good Wireless-N AP. The B/G access works good though, and there are some decent features otherwise. I'm considering returning this product at this point as Wireless-N is mandatory for me.
источник
Profile no image

ХроноГость-0PUCE

20.12.2012

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I called Cisco/Linksys tech support. Someone told me I had called the wrong number. I called the new number and got someone who said none of the right tech support people had been available, so I had been routed to the wrong place but some of the right ones were now available so I should call back. I did call back and got someone who said I was still at the wrong place but she would put me through to the right place. I waited on line for 8 minutes, being assured that an engineer would be with me. But then the line went dead. I called back again, waited 8 minutes, the line went dead. I called back again and asked for a supervisor, but after being on hold for 10 minutes, I hung up. Then I bought Netgear equipment, called tech support, was put through right away to a very helpful person.
источник
Profile no image

НаноПилигрим-7ZSTD

28.02.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Rolled this out to replace an aging access point. Straightforward setup, though I did have to put it on a 192.168.x.x/16 network to access the config page... that's to be expected for a small business/consumer AP, though.Lots of mounting options, good range for 802.11g, and PoE for under a hundred bucks. Meshed it with a few others, all working fine. No complaints whatsoever.
источник
Profile no image

Аргонавт-5CLEM

04.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Setup was tricky because the router's default settings assumes that one's network is running 192.168.1.x. Once I created a network with that morrored those settings, it worked fine. Then I switched the default to "scan network," and the device picked up my netowrk and worked great afterwards. All good.
источник
Profile no image

Спектроник-4KMNR

10.09.2012

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

If I had to guess I would say there was some kind of manufacturing defect with this model. I'm a network technician and I ignored that people said they didn't work. I just figured the people probably didn't know how to configure the access points. Well, I just bought 2 and both have extremely slow download speeds. I updated firmware, tried turning off security and running them with all default settings. I finally gave up and called Cisco and talked with 2 separate techs. Both said they saw other open cases with this model, but there was never any resolution. Basically, they told me to send them back. Cisco is known for networking so they know what they are doing, that is why I say there must be something wrong internally with the antenna or something like that. I'm going to send them back and try the WAP321 and see if it works any better.
источник
Profile no image

ТехноНаблюдатель-1MJON

24.07.2012

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I bought this for our new office to use in a central location near the ceiling. My IT guys liked the fact that it was PoE (Power over Ethernet) so with the right PoE port on our Cisco ASA505 router, it would not need to be plugged into an outlet. I have found the wireless to be unusably slow. Email times out, and internet pages barely pull up after a couple minutes. I've adjusted some of the settings, and it could be that I just don't have it configured correctly or that it needs new firmware. However if that is the case, this is definitely not an intuitive router and it does not work well out of the box. We originally assigned a static IP, and I've tried DHCP as well in addition to changing the channels in case of neighborly traffic. We needed the wireless up, so we've put in a Netgear N600 and it works great out of the box. Here's a link on the Cisco support forum with other people having the same issue:[...].
источник
Profile no image

НеоВояжер-4UEPS

25.02.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Arrived on time and as described, Configure once, let it run. Behaves well with our matching Cisco Wireless G. I expect it to run for a long time.
источник
Profile no image

Сириус-3JIXW

26.10.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Not sure why people are having problems, I used 2 AP's and set them up using PoE off a Cisco Small Business switch at home.Download speeds are fine, and I like the range of these things.Obviously you need to do some tuning with placement, and channel choice.I do have my connection drop/re-establish when I wander from one coverage area to another but it's not a big deal since I use this at home.For an actual business I would not use these, perhaps the dual-radio one...but better to do it right with a wireless controller etc..
источник
Profile no image

ТехноНаблюдатель-2YZSN

20.11.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

We have around 300 of these and since some are starting to fail I purchased spares. They are easy to setup, work well and the shipping came in on time as promised. I have no complaints about my purchase so it deserves 5 stars.
источник
Profile no image

Эксопилот-5SPGO

30.11.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Good performance for a small office. So far the connection has dropped only 1 after a couple of months of usage, dont know if it's the AP or the power injector I'm using.
источник
Profile no image

Нейрон-6BWSA

04.06.2012

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I want to use this small business AP to replace the wrt54gl for our company. My goal: let it work as an access point for 20 users reliably. It constantly stop wireless connection while my wrt54gl works well. There are more users on wrt54gl than this wap2000 when it stopped working. I even webexed with a Cisco tech support guy. He did not give me the explanation for why the AP stop working but give me some seemingly irrelevant advises as not use WEP, not use the mix mode but G only etc. (None of those should cause a AP to stop connection by merely 5 to 10 connections). I actually tried two units just in case the first one is a bad apple. I will return the second one as well and continue to use WRT54GL, configured as an AP limiting to max 20 users.
источник
Profile no image

Астрон-7BSJF

29.11.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This Wireless Access Point is an Excellent, Reliable product. Suitable for small business use. Easily configures and has good range
источник
Profile no image

Эксопилот-6CSBB

15.08.2012

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Haven't been able to test this producted yet. The product features clearly states that the external power can come from the "included adapter." Had to order a $30 power supply for it and am now having to wait a couple more days before I can use it.This product does not come with a power supply!!Product FeaturesFormer Linksys Business SeriesCisco WAP2000 Wireless-G Access Point - PoEStandards-based PoE (IEEE 802.3af) or external power from the included adapter
источник
Profile no image

НаноРейдер-2DWGJ

18.07.2012

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I couldn't figure out why my iPhone wouldn't connect to this AP unless it was wired into my network.Apparently it can't act as a DHCP server, so it's only good for expanding an existing network.You can't make it the sole wireless AP (router) on a network.This probably won't concern most people, but it's a show-stopper for me.Darn waste of $140. I can't beleive they couldn't fit this feature in the software.Phil
источник
Profile no image

Астрон-1TCGJ

20.07.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I use it to broaden wireless coverage at my house. The price is not expensive. Its performance and reliability is impressive. I am satisfied with this tiny AP. Good Design cater to my needs.
источник
Profile no image

Нейрон-8IBDM

19.10.2011

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I chose this Access Point instead of replacing my non-wireless router so that I could install wireless without messing around with my existing router settings. Big mistake. Yes, I received a wireless signal instantly, but gaining access to the administrative interface proved much more difficult because the IPs do not set automatically. The instructions are, of course, worse than useless. There are pictures and detailed explanations on how to insert the power adapter into the back of the machine or attach the machine to a wall (duh!) but absolutely nothing on the really critical issue of troubleshooting interface problems. Nada. The web, of course, has some useful information that can help but it wasn't enough to solve the problem. I spoke to an IT professional who has a good understanding of IPs and we worked through the problem only to discover that there was an additional conflict with my Gateway PC that also needed to be addressed. At this point I took the pragmatic approach and returned the Access Point to Amazon. I switched from cable to FIOS, with a free wireless/ LAN router. That has worked fine.
источник
Profile no image

МехаРейнджер-9SWXC

13.06.2012

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Do a google search "wap12 slow speed" before you buy and be warned. Do not buy and get caught up Cisco support merry-go-round. Support has been no help. I am an IT manager and have such a bad taste over this product I will not be buying any more Cisco products in the future.
источник
Profile no image

Вектрон-3AZKG

28.06.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This product is an AP so it works differently then Router. If you don't know how a AP works you might not be able to set it up sucessfully. However, once you sent it up, it is a good AP.
источник
Profile no image

ТерраБот-5YMOA

28.06.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

It is a wireless AP with high performance and quality, very easy to install, just plug it to switch and router. Stable and good usability.
источник
Profile no image

Эксопилот-3BXTF

31.01.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Excellent wireless device, much better than the older models or home versions. This allows us to setup multiple access points that you can move between without disconnecting and reconnecting. We have tried with other home style equipment and it really didn't do the job. I have deployed these in a few different houses and two of them can cover very large areas.IMPORTANT: If you want stand alone NOT using a central enterprise CISCO wireless controller, make sure that you are getting part #AIR-APxxxx not AIR-LAPxxx. They will both be listed as Aironet 1131AG access points. The "L" means it needs a controller as opposed to be stand alone.
источник
Profile no image

Вектрон-8QKKM

17.12.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I purchased this access point for a customer who had a 7 year old 3Com that was dying. I wasn't sure if it could handle the same amount of traffic as the 3Com. I also wasn't sure if it could give the same coverage.The answer in both cases was yes and it was easy to setup to boot.This customer will need one or two more and it is at the top of the list.
источник
Profile no image

Синтрон-2FTWB

28.02.2011

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Make sure this is the one you want! I accidentally purchased this when I was looking for the stand alone AP. Notice the difference in the model number(AIR-LAP1131AG-A-K9). This means it's the LAP version, which requires a controller device and doesn't work as stand alone.I was able however to configure it for being a stand alone AP using the other reviews from reviewers who also got the wrong one.With that being said, it's Cisco, so once I did get it working correctly I haven't touched it since.
источник
Profile no image

Вояджер-4VOQC

25.05.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I don't understand why people purchase enterprise level devices like this access point for their homes or apartments and complain when it doesn't work out of the box. This 1131AG is meant to be used in a networked environment, specifically in combination with a WLAN controller. When the WLAN controller is configured properly, this 1131AG will auto-configure itself as soon as it is given ethernet and broadcast all SSID's on the controller. (Note that the automatic behavior is unique to this Lightweight model, AIR-LAP1131AG - be careful when ordering.) The range on this unit is superb, and like most Cisco products, it is extremely reliable and durable. It comes with a variety of mounting plates, a bag of machine screws, power adapter (though PoE is preferred due to the size of the brick) and a user guide. I would have liked if they included wood or drywall screws because 99% of the time I am installing these on walls, but that is a small complaint. Overall this is one of the better WAP's out there for the small to medium sized business. Together with a WLAN controller like the Cisco 2106 you will enjoy a very robust and reliable WiFi network.
источник
Profile no image

Квазар-9SEXX

18.11.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

These WAPs were very easy to set up, and have performed great. Manual included in box on a CD. Purchased 2 units. and would purchase again.
источник
Profile no image

Гравитон-7KCKP

23.03.2010

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I purchased it for residential use. Clearly a good product, however, you'll need a networking specialist to set this up. The product did not include any instructions on how to configure. Quite complicated configuration for the average residential use.
источник
Profile no image

Супернова-9GKVK

31.10.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I had a home office and a Linksys WRT54g router. I wanted to secure my network more and have more LAN ports, but still have wifi. So I bought this AP, a Linksys VPN firewall Router, and an 8-port switch. Had the AP, the switch, my printer, and NAS plugged into the VPN Router, and my computers to the Switch. Worked flawlessy. This baby has serious range. I would go get the mail (our driveway is about 1/4 mile, and my iPhone would still be connected to the wifi this thing puts out. Also it is so much more secure than a regular 4 port wireless router. You can assigned the IP for it, which will be the gateway for the devices connected. Secure, safe, and awesome. Not for the technically challenged. But easy to you if you should be using it.
источник
Profile no image

НаноПилигрим-6XCJL

21.01.2010

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Its not the best you can buy for this price, but still a very decently priced AP. The configuration is pretty straight forward and its well documented as well.
источник
Profile no image

Гиперион-3GMMN

20.01.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I bought this product to provide secure wireless services to our company network. I was pleasantly surprised that it has support for multiple SSIDs with tagged VLAN support (useful for creating a "guest" network for visitors, as well as a separate secure internal network). It supports WPA2-Enterprise, which I'm using together with Windows Server 2003 IAS to allow domain users to be authenticated to the network using their windows login automatically. I was fully expecting problems deploying this somewhat bleading-edge feature, but so far it's worked perfectly (aside from the hassles associated with Microsoft's poor group policy support for WPA2 in XP Pro). The unit has never requiring a restart since I installed it. The physical hardware seems well made also. I'm not using the POE support, because the range on this AP is good enough to allow it to sit in our phone room and cover the entire floor. Overall, this product feels like it's benefited from the Cisco influence, unlike some of Linksys' other recent efforts.
источник
Показаны отзывы 9-45 из 45.

Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой

9.8/10 баллов

TP-LINK Deco M4 (2-pack)

295 отзывов

от 5870.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

TP-LINK Deco M4

212 отзывов

от 3699.00 0

9.4/10 баллов

MikroTik HAP AC lite

637 отзывов

от 11698.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

MikroTik MAP 2nD

75 отзывов

от 9530.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

TP-LINK Archer A64

377 отзывов

от 6690.00 руб.

9.3/10 баллов

Ubiquiti UniFi AC Lite

59 отзывов

от 26794.00 руб.

9.3/10 баллов

MikroTik HAP

218 отзывов

от 23171.00 руб.

9.3/10 баллов

Ubiquiti NanoStation M2

103 отзывов

от 12308.00 руб.

9.3/10 баллов

MikroTik CAP ac

208 отзывов

от 9893.00 руб.

9.3/10 баллов

Tenda AC5V3

445 отзывов

от 3280.00 руб.

9.2/10 баллов

TP-LINK Deco M5, 3-pack

326 отзывов

от 17580.00 руб.

9.2/10 баллов

Tenda MW3-3

271 отзывов

от 15747.00 руб.

9.2/10 баллов

D-link DWL-6610AP/B1

100 отзывов

от 10690.00 руб.

9.2/10 баллов

Mercusys Halo H30G 2-pack AC1300 Домашн

76 отзывов

от 4999.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

TP-LINK Deco M4 (3-pack)

932 отзывов

от 12930.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

Tenda 4G03

108 отзывов

от 7410.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

TP-LINK Archer A5

1393 отзывов

от 3700.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Mercusys Halo H30G(3-pack) AC1300 10/100/1000B

49 отзывов

от 12957.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

TP-LINK TL-WN722N

1073 отзывов

от 2050.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Mercusys AC10

329 отзывов

от 1599.00 руб.