Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
I should explain that, no matter how much investigating you do, you'll never know if you made the right decision. When I bought the Olympus, the choices were limited to perhaps four 3+ megapixel cameras. Now, with a hundred choices, your chances of getting the ideal camera are slim IF you know digital cameras at all. Sometimes, ignorance is bliss.
A620 pros: Easy to use. Menus are well laid out, though the primary button on the back of the camera could have "easier" more readable buttons. But once you get used to them, they're fine. Love the various special effects that you can add to your pictures. And even the movie mode will give a decent movie if you have a 1 gig card.
The LCD is fantastic, and revolved 180 degrees. Not that I expected to take a self-portrait, but I actually have used the easy-to-see (in most any light) LCD for all kinds of shots.
The viewfinder (a must for those of you who are looking at any digital camera) is good, and off by only a degree or two.
Pictures are sharp and the lens is as good as Olympus Zuiko, and that's going some.
Before I forget, I'd give Canon an A+ on its software. It is downright simple and though I might have to use Thumbs+ or Photoshop for minor tweaking, this software is a snap on layouts and printing. Many who have written about Canon's software call it "weak" or "for beginners only." Well, I'm no beginner, and it's a pleasure to get a composite print or contact sheet set up and printed in 5 minutes.
Portraits and landscapes are excellent. Closeups...see below.
It's fast.
It has the feel of a 35mm camera. It has some weight and it's comfortable.
The zoom is very good.
Cons: Can't turn off flash in Auto mode.
The macro is trickier than the Olympus and doesn't always produce good results. One trick is that you press the shutter button half-way before taking the picture, and you'll get better focus. Half of my pictures are macros, and I've been somewhat disappointed. I think that going to the manual mode is the solution, and that may put off most who go the digital route for more than just point and shoot.
The warning light for using a tripod seemingly comes on 80% of the time. Admittedly, we've had rain in California since I bought the camera, but I have no trouble keeping the camera steady and, in low light suituations, letting the flash do the rest.
I'd recommend the camera, but if you're looking for one that you can just tuck in your shirt pocket, this isn't for you.
Canon Factory fixed it in about 8 calander days. Focuses excellent and fast. Love it! Excellent stills. I have not figured out which of the 2 video modes to use, both seem very nice and I'm burning DVDs which are not HD anyway. Oh, buy MORE batteries. I have 3 and am using at least 2 on a long vacation day.
After reading the last review about the focus problem, I've got to post that I have a problem with mine focusing also.
I've had this little gem for about a week. The first thing I noticed is that it had a very hard time focusing - to the point that it would only auto focus (no manual focus available) in the middle of the zoom. I could occasionally "coax" it to focus outside the middle, and hoped it would get better with some use. After 5 days of playing with it, I pulled it out to take a picture of my daughter playing in the pool, only to find it took me over 60 sec to get it to focus - missing the shot.
Knowing this is the first generation (I am a owner of the first generation ELURA miniDVD camcorder too - this is the replacement) I made sure I bought a USA Warrenty camera. I have now sent it in to the Cannon Factory repair in Ill. If it comes back and works properly - it's a KEEPER. If it doesnt, it will be sent back again, or on Ebay, and I'll be waiting for the second version.
The ONLY negative I found was with the flash, it is NOT the best. Also its hard to find a "GOOD" case for the TX1, although you CAN carry it in your shirt pocket or purse if you wish.
I would recommend getting a spare battery & a "GOOD" SD card, I use the Sandisk Ultra II 4gb SDHC card that I got right here @ Amazon & it has PLENTY of room for videos & pictures. I understand that Sandisk is NOW going to offer an 8GB SDHC card, WOW. One note; If you get an SDHC card...get the one that comes with the MicroMate card reader included, most of the "OLDER" computers wont recognize the SDHC card when you insert it into the card slot.
If you are looking for a good "COMPACT" digital camera that takes both EXCELLENT videos & GREAT pictures...then this is the camera for you...
It couldn't equal the sharpness of the Sanyo HD1 even with software sharpening. The noise reduction eliminated what little detail remained. Certain levels of zoom got sharper images.
The worst problem was the lack of an ND filter. Without it, the sensor bloomed in any daylight conditions. The problem affected every object, not just the bright light sources. Images were like looking through dirty windows.
The recording time was 29min on an 8 gig card. Never used the special audio features like manual gain & audio-only recording.
For video control, the exposure lock didn't work. It only locked exposure after recording started. Focus lock worked, but was kicked out during zoom. There was no shutter speed or aperture control, only exposure lock. You couldn't force a faster shutter speed and wide aperture to capture sports at night. Forget about depth of field effects.
Auto focus was horrible. The Sanyo's funky 5 point auto focus did a better job. The Canon's single point auto focus always searched.
Redeeming factors: stabilization was the best of any camera.
The Canon used a full frame shutter, providing straight lines in low light. The Sanyo HD1 used a rolling shutter which caused wavy lines in low light.
Pros: Great quality video, supports 2, 4, 8 and 16GB SDHC cards (so far)
Cons: need lots of batteries, camera functionality is just OK, 2GB file size limit (translates to recording time limit)
I use the camera primarily to video stuff for the kids (sporting events, performances, etc.). Thankfully, most recordings don't need to be more than 15 minutes at a time -- otherwise, the 2GB file size limit would hit and/or it'd run out of batteries.
I was expecting this to just eat AA batteries like my old Canon A70. I had even packed a ton of batteries for my trip in anticipation of this. Instead, I was able to take 200-300 pictures on each set of batteries.
The 8MP was also plenty and the shots we made into posters turned out great.
Finally, the camera also takes great pictures in all modes. I especially feel like the night shots came out much better than my previous A70. The audio on movie mode was also much improved over older models. The ONLY slight con is that framing a shot with the viewfinder sometimes produces mixed results. I think the actual picture taken tends to be a little bigger than what you see in the viewfinder....for example if you frame a shot to avoid a tourist in the viewfinder, that person may still make an appearance in your photo. In these situations, I just used the LCD screen which seemed to be a more faithful representation of the photo to be taken.






