Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot S3 IS
691 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot S3 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot S3 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Now you know you cant have the good without the bad.Even though I said the autofocus was good it wasnt great.There were times where I went to focus in on something and despite plenty of light,the object I was aiming at was still,it would tend to lose focus.It was beyond me why this was.The ISO speeds provided some noise,especially the higher the speed.This camera is very SLR-like.You do have the option of adjusting settings and whatnot but I found out about a month into having the camera that I had maxed out these options.They can only go so far.And since they could only go so far I did sell it and get a 350D(XT).But that is only because I want to learn more about the technical side of photography,so again dont let that turn you away from this camera.And then there are the little details.Like that the camera mount was made out of plastic.Meaning if it were screwed too tightly on a tripod there is the possibility it could crack.Whenever the mermory card door was open it would turn off the camera,causing you to lose any buffed images.Even though in my mind these "complaints" or "imperfections" are extremely petty and shouldnt really deture you from buying this camera.I feel that they were things that would keep this camera from being perfect,and thus I had to mention them.
Conlusion:Get this camera.You wont be sorry.Fantastic features,a step above what Ive seen in other cameras.The rotating screen is very very handy in certain situations.Good feel in the hand.It even has some attachments that you can buy to enhance you photos.Which means you can add filters,even though the vivid colors feature recreates that.Brilliant point and shoot camera that gives SOME feel as if it were a DSLR.Again,Canon has put out a very worthy camera.And for the price you really cant go wrong.

This camera takes the best pictures that I have ever taken. But I had to learn to use it.
This is NOT a good choice for the weekend photographer who just wants to take pictures of the kids. This is a state-of-the-art photography platform with literally hundreds of settings.
Some early reviews complained about blurry or grainy pictures. These people did not know how to set up the camera for the conditions. Some reviews complain about the color balance or saturation. But color balance, contrast, gamma, etc. are completely configurable in this camera, so there is no basis for these complaints.
A lot of people assume that the "Auto" setting will let them take pictures casually or mindlessly with this camera, and get perfect results. That might be largely true with the cheaper point-and-shoot cameras with smaller lenses, but not with this one.
The cheaper cameras with smaller lenses are not capable of attaining the superb performance of this lens. But because they are smaller, they are "in focus" over a wide range, so they produce acceptable pictures more or less regardless of settings or focus.
If you are willing to take the time to learn this camera, then I cannot think of a better one. But like with a musical instrument, you will need to practice. It takes some time to learn where to put your fingers, and where not to put your fingers, because there a lots of buttons and settings exposed on the surface of the camera. You will need to learn to use the autofocus to best advantage, and learn the proper program modes to match with your shooting conditions.
If you take the time to really learn the camera, you will control a device that covers the range from a microscope to a telescope. In macro mode, it will focus down to objects actually touching the lens. Or you can crank it up to a 50 power zoom. It takes excellent movies under a wide variety of conditions. Image stabilization makes it seem like your handheld home movies are taken from a professional camera dolly. It takes pictures without flash in conditions so dark that I could not see the subject at all. With the built-in image stabilization, it is capable of taking handheld pictures that rival the sharpness of a large format view camera on a tripod.
But if you just want an easy to operate camera for good snapshots, you should look for a simpler camera. Some of the less expensive models of the Powershot might be better for most people.

I have always handled the camera with care, there were no drops or bumps.
This is my last Canon. It's a fine product when it works but I expect more lifetime from such an expensive product.

Good points:
- Good, if not great, photos.
- 12x zoom a very distinct advantage.
- I love the one-touch video function. I know some people complain about the 1GB limit, it doesnt bother me because you can restart recording once it stops! Simple. Ok, you will lose a second or 2, but... go get a camcoder if you can't live with it! And the quality is good too.
- You can even take pictures while taking a video - not of best quality, but its just a function provided! All you do is press the shutter release button while rec video.
- Option to attach a wide-angle lens to cover a larger area in photos.
- And yeah - GREAT battery life! I use 2500mA rechargeable batteries and they last for whole length of my day trips (and more)!
- The "twistable" LCD screen is useful while holding camera close to ground or high up above (street festivals, for eg.)!
Not-So-Good points:
- Noisy zoom function. Sometimes can be heard in the recorded video!
- The "Funct" button on the back of the camera is a short-cut to changing photo dimensions and I once ended up pressing it by mistake. All the photos that followed were 640x480!! I have since learnt to be cautious and also check the settings once in a while.
- Option to use SD cards higher than 2GB would be useful for recording video.
I am not a professional to comment about the pro use of camera, but for person like me learning about the manual control functions its great!
PS: I wanted to give something less than 5 stars, but did not have the heart to knock off one whole!

The good:
1. It uses alkaline AA batteries.
2. It's light.
3. It fits my hands like a glove. On a piano, I have about a 10-12 key stretch.
4. I'm techy enough so while a bit overwhelmed with all the options, I can handle them.
5. Loading from the camera to the computer is a snap!
6. The RCA jacks are a hoot, allowing displaying pictures on a t.v. easy and fun.
7. There are various instructions booklets for them and they're separate English and Spanish - not both. One set can be discarded!
8. I got some great shots for someone who just replaced her very good Nikon SLR for her first digital camera.
The Bad:
1. I only took about 15 pictures before the camera literally just died on me; it wouldn't power on for a third time. Of course, I tried a couple of different new sets of batteries and the originals should have been fine.
2. Is it black to cover the potentially flimsy plastic body? (The S2 - that I refused to buy - had "silvery-cheap" look and feel and the S3 seems like a stones throw away.)
3. Red-eye is pretty bad due to the low flash to the body and the software that comes with the camera, while having the option to "edit it out" puts human eyes in; this looks really creepy when your main subject matters are a dog and cat.
4. It is a bit heavy; be prepared.
I've looked for a couple of years for the right camera to replace my Nikon 35mm. The digital camera needed to be:
1. Light
2. Produce good quality pictures (overall)
3. Have good reviews by users, not "editors." One never knows if a review by an editor is a paid advertisement in disguise.
4. Be easy enough for me to handle and to teach my partner, who's less of a techy to use.
5. Have image stabilization (the jury is still out on how real that is... got some fuzzies when I wasn't expecting it)
6. Have a very good optical zoom
It meets and exceeds most of those requirements. So, I'm asking for a replacement, rather than a refund. We'll see where this goes from here.
The replacement from Amazon came faster than a speeding bullet and worked at first shot (to my delight). I've used it to take pictures from the car as we passed unimportant things, just to see what it would do. At 40-45 miles an hour, it freezes signs so read them (one cannot tell they were shot while we were moving). The ISO setting is high, there's no blur. The camera is amazing and with the steady decrease in price, I highly recommend this to anyone with a glimmer of being able to adapt to lengthy and clear directions and who can handle the many features this camera has to offer.

And then I bought the S3. It makes things so easy! Just keeping it on Auto has made some terrific photos, which show what I wanted to show, without having to fight anything.
It turns on and off instantly, unlike the camera I replaced with the S3. It's almost silent. The noise of taking a picture can be turned on and off, but I like the little noise, so I keep it on. You can also change the noise to something silly like a dog barking, which is amusing.
I've started to experiment with the other settings, but even if all I ever used was the Auto and my "eye", I'd be happy with this camera.
I did consider the S5 because it has a couple more options, but when I tried them out in a store, the S5 was just a little bit bigger, deeper from front to back, and it didn't fit my relatively small hand as well. The S3 is a bit smaller, and fits perfectly.

This camera: is known for its zoom, video capabilities, and typical high quality pictures expected from a canon digital camera.
I shopped the comparable panasonic camera which have been noted to have a better lens, but worse noise, and also less versatile video mode. I was very impressed with the canon s3's movie mode.
The canon S3 also suprised me by the ability to take macro photographs with 0cm focus range. It was so close that the dirt on my lens surface was captured in the picture.
I did notice chromatic abberation problems with the lens, but it is still a fantastic camera overall.
image stabilization works well, but i wouldn't expect miracles. I read in online forums and review sites that the panasonic digicams have the best image stabilization.
I am a fairly tech saavy 24 year old, and this canon S3 was the best camera for the price that I could find, and I am very happy with it.
I did consider purchasing a Pentax K100d which is a digital slr. It would have had a bigger sensor(better for low light photography), more options of lenses, but lacks a video mode. I ultimately looked at my budget, asked myself what i wanted, and chose the canon S3. For under 300$, I would pick definately pick the canon S3 again.

Pros:
- Feels good, looks good, great ergonomics. Usually I de-emphasize this, but this is an exception.
- The pictures turn out great.
- The movie mode is awesome, good stereo sound (but see below under cons)
- It is quick and responsive, for zoom and focus.
- The rotating display is nice not only to take pictures of myself, but also to take closer pictures of other people in a candid way -- i.e. you won't be in their face with the camera obviously pointed towards the person.
- Some scene modes on the selector dial which is convenient.
- Flash doesn't automatically pop up. Most people see this as a disadvantage. I see it as a great advantage. If I don't want flash, I leave it down. It suggests using flash on the LCD. If I want to use the flash, I then flip it up.
Cons:
- Small 2" LCD, plus inferior viewfinder. This is almost a show-stopper for me. This camera is basically an upgrade to the S2. Due to competition, the next version of this camera is likely to have a larger LCD. It depends on whether you need an ultra zoom camera now, vs. waiting for next spring.
- There is no date stamp on the photos. This can be added using Canon's software according to their technical support.
- Plastic camera tripod mount.
- The movie mode produces really high quality videos. The problem is that they aren't compressed, or as compressed as other cameras. A movie can be only 1G, and only 8 minutes of video can fit on a 1G SD card.
- Lack of scene modes.
A comparison with the new Kodak p712.
The new Kodak, also an upgrade (of the 850) now focused quickly and has best in class low shutter lag. I had the 850 and have the 712, and there is a big difference.
The Kodak has better image stabilization.
The Kodak has *many* scene modes. This helps the non-professional get the settings right.
The quality of the images is about equal (other than the canon not being as good with image stabilization at maximum zoom).
There are more options for flash types
There are more buttons on the camera for faster settings.
The LCD and quality viewfinder make the Kodak a more fun camera.
The disadvantages of the Kodak over the S3, is that the Kodak doesn't have a rotating display, so photos of people could be more intrusive. The Kodak doesn't have the great feel or looks of the S3.
I think that I will be rewarded if I wait for the next iteration of Canon's ultra zoom. With Kodak's larger display, Sony's 3" display, Canon will have to make theirs bigger. A Canon with a larger display plus other improvements they may add would be my dream camera.
I am not going to keep the Kodak p712 either. I love that camera, but I want a rotating display. Having tried the rotating display, I am hooked on it.

It's a fine camera. The controls are well placed and it's easy to learn and use. The one thing I might change would be to put the hinge for the articulating LCD on the bottom like on the Panasonic Lumix FZ-30 rather
than on the side.
Recommend.


I wanted to replace a dead p&s model and decided to try something a little more advanced. My needs didn't require a DSLR so I stared to research other options.
My first requirement was that the camera have a way other than the LCD on which to compose. This eliminated a lot of cameras from consideration. There are a few with optical viewfinders but very few were more than higher-end p&s models.
That's when I started to look into models with EVFs. This narrowed the field down considerably. Every brand and model is a compromise of some sort and it came down to finding the ones with the fewest compromises.
The Canon S3IS turned out to be the camera. I bought it here on Amazon for about $20 more than it's selling for today. The price of this camera seems to be dropping almost daily. Possibly there's a replacement model coming soon.
I've only had the camera for a few weeks and haven't given it a full workout yet. Preliminary results show it to be a fine piece of equipment with more features than I'll ever use. I especially like the fact that it uses AA batteries. Rechargeable NIMH batteries are inexpensive and regular alkalines are available in an emergency.
Other than for 1 shortcoming, I would have given the S3IS 5 stars. The lens is quite prone to red fringing in the highlight areas at the longer end of it's focal length. I find this very disappointing coming from a company like Canon.
Perhaps I'm being too fussy about this, but I've used some fine lenses over the years and am very demanding of lens performance. Under most circumstances the fringing isn't an issue and at the 4X6 print size is really almost impossible to see. Be that as it may, I find it annoying and spoils what is otherwise a fine piece of equipment.

If you decide to grab one, I suggest the following must haves:
1, 2, or 4 gigabyte SD card such as this: Transcend High-Speed Secure Digital Card (150x) - 2GB
Set of rechargeable batteries running between 2200mah to 2700mah such as this:Energizer 15-Minute Battery Charger
52mm or 58mm Lens adapter (you should order this from Lensmate as they make a nicely machined aluminum adapter that is superior to the canon/other brands)
Clip-type lens cap that will fit the camera and/or adapter:
Canon 58mm Snap-On Lens Cap
Filters: 1 linear or circular Polarizing filter (minimal reflections/better sky contrast) and 1 UV or Clear filter (protect your lens from scratches, dust, or gunk):Hoya HMC - Filter - circular polarizer - 58 mmHoya 58mm Clear Protection, Multi-Coated Ultra Thin Mount Glass Filter.

It's 2011 (4yrs later)
The viewfinder and screen failed 2 years ago requiring a costly non-warranty trip to Canon. This year the viewfinder now spontaneously shuts off requiring restarts in the middle of all picture taking sessions. Bummer! Since last repair was 2/3 the cost of a new camera I had to be cost effective for the quality of what I had so I sprung for the repair. Obviously two repairs of that expense are out of the question! I am looking at the most highly rated Nikon L120 to replace this disappointing glitchmeister.

I like the fact that the viewfinder is a small video screen so you can see exactly what is going to be in the picture as well as using it to review pictures.
Battery life was very acceptable using name brand rechargeable batteries that were slow charged.

Batteries: The battery life is amazing and they have outlasted my Kodak. With my Kodak, I was able to take only 35 pictures, before the low-batt warning came up. With this Canon, I was able to take close to 260 pictures on the original battery before the low-battery warning showed.
Pictures: The quality of pictures are amazing even on the default "fine" setting. On the "Super Fine" setting the images are even better.
Zoom: The 12x optical zoom is one of the highest offered in its class and the digital zoom of 4x is only good upto 2x when taking clear shots. the Macro and Super Macro (no zoom available) is a wonderful feature that everyone would love if they are into taking close up shots.
Features: The anti-shake is activated by default on low shutter speed or low light situations and result in wonderful crisp pictures. The add on Telephoto lens feature is something very useful for enthusiasts who would like to spend most of their time outdoors.
Ease of Use: Its almost like a point-and-shoot camera, with manual mode settings as of an SLR. The dials are preset to compensate for the Aperture and also the Shutter speeds which come in handy for trial and error use under low light setting, but for advanced users, the Manual mode setting is better since one can adjust the focus, shutter speed and exposure when taking pictures.
Cons: Does not come with a carrying case and the battery cover is a little flimsy but nothing to worry about.
Additional comments: get a low of 1GB SD card and extra set of batteries and you are good for a great weekend worth of picture taking with no problems.

Now as for the photo-taking part it works great too. The pictures are clear. I've taken many pictures near the ocean, and the water comes out a deep blue like it's suppose to do. My favorite feature is the color accent.
My only beef with the camera is the viewfinder. It really isn't the regular viewfinder as I had expected. I wanted it just in case I run low on batteries. I could use the viewfinder instead of the LCD to save energy. Well the viewfinder is really just a smaller version of the LCD screen. It works great though if you can't see anything on the regular LCD because of lighting issues. Overall I say it's still a great camera.

Comparisons with it predecessor aside, the S3 IS Image quality is very good - certainly on a par with most of its competitors - though the results are still a bit on the soft side, something the fairly high default sharpening doesn't really help. Again, experimenting with the in-camera parameters and a little sympathetic post-processing means that in the right hands it can produce images every bit as good as anything else in its class. The ISO 800 mode is probably too noisy for anything but 'emergency' use, and there are occasional exposure problems, but generally speaking the output is pleasing enough to satisfy the majority of the intended market.
But ultimately, like the models that came before it, the appeal of the S3 IS goes beyond simple pixel-peeping; it has a class-leading feature set, a very reliable image stabilization system (the benefits of which cannot be overstated) and superb handling. It's well-priced, incredibly versatile and - above all - highly enjoyable to use. Despite the long lens and speedy operation it's not the ideal 'sports' camera (the focus at the long end of the zoom isn't fast enough and does hunt a little), but for sheer shooting pleasure and versatility the PowerShot S3 IS still takes some beating."
The above is the original review which made me go for this camera, and after buying it, I have realised how true the review was.


There are a lot of features that I don't know how to use but it takes excellent pictures in my opinion. I have done a lot of experimenting with the different settings to figure out what works best.
The zoom is really great and I love the flip out window to get a better view of your shot.
The one thing that I would definitely recommend is that you purchase at least one set of rechargeable batteries -- it goes through regular alkalines pretty fast!

What really rocks about this camera is the video. It shoots as good as a camcorder without having to mess with the tape stuff. I love that! The 12x zoom comes handy, so does the stabilizer... And the flip screen... But what good do they do if the pictures are so-so.
Basically, don't expect miracles. This camera looks like a CRT, but it is not even close. I like my friend's Sony Cybershot DSC-H3 pictures much better. Consider it as a better option.

The placement of the buttons on the back of the camera (right next to the lift-up screen, which is a GREAT feature for taking above-the-crowd shots) is a major design flaw. At first I thought this would be a minor thing (having read about it in other reviews), but during the course of shooting in an action-based environment, I inadvertently (and completely unknowingly) reset the picture quality from high to medium and then to low. Just touching the somewhat sensitive button (while picking the camera up, opening the view screen, or jogging a bit with the camera slung at your side) can result in changing the picture quality. I do wish there was a way to "lock" the camera's settings so that this didn't happen, but in the meantime, beware of this little devil in the details. You can always compensate for a few of the other setting in your photo editing software, but you can't go back and reshoot a scene if you wind up with web-sized files and intended to have a nice set of 8x10 prints available for a client.

The felt ring on the lens cap came off, but Canon promptly sent us a new cap. So I was pleased with the service as well.
But, it's kind of bulky for day to day use. I ended up buying a little camera my wife could stick in her purse. And the pictures from that camera look just as good to me (to my untrained eye, that is). So in retrospect...we probably won't get a ton of use from this camera. But it does live up to it's description.

In auto I love the ability to flip down the flash to force a slightly long shutter speed in the heat of taking nigh time shots. Many people complain about the lens cap falling off... I think it is a feature of the camera enabling it to fall off when you extend the lens for use.
I am happy with it.

