Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 7D

I've had mine for just over 2 years...GREAT camera...easy to use takes awsome photos even at High ISO...very easy and intuitive menues systems the autofocus is fast and reliable

works to my needs,hope to improve on changing setting once i become more comfortable with would reccomend provides great pictures

As a camera it seems fine. I had hoped to get both still and high quality video out of this. In 1080 mode the camera will shoot 11 minutes (4gB) before it shuts off and you have to manually restart it. It is apparently a video camera tariff thing. So no recording performances of any event over 11 minutes long without active interruptions and restarts. This is really irritating, going to send it back, this is too expensive a piece of equipment not to have unrestricted recording, up yours Canon.

Very awesome! The camera I got was previously used so can't complain about a bit of cosmetic wear. Overall product works perfect and has really helped improve my photography skills.

Had to send this camera in to Cannon three times, so far, to fix a flash sync problem. Just got it back again and they finally replaced the sync socket and card. Hope it works

I didn't purchase this item, someone tried to purchase this item by obtaining all my amazon account information.....so I have no idea if this is a good camera or not.

I purchased this as a backup for my Canon 5D mk2. The functions are so similar and the images can be easily edited together. The price difference makes it a good alternative to the 5D if you are only looking for one camera.As much as I like the Canon cameras, I've been taking a serious look at some of the new Sony offerings. Built-in image stabilization, good HD video and articulating LCD screens make them very tempting. The Canon cameras may have been the first HD DSLRs on the scene, but they are starting to look a little outdated.

The one I got had a squeaky CF door. I noticed it the very first time I picked it up; it was that obvious. After doing some reading online, it appears this is a common (but not universal) build problem. I considered exchanging it before I'd gotten much further unpacking, but thought I might as well shoot with it for a weekend to see how it performed compared to my trusty 40D. (For what it's worth, the 40D's door is rock solid and has absolutely no "give" to it.)I shot an autocross event in light varying from full sun to mild cloud cover. Exposures were typically around 1/2000 at f/2.8 ISO 100, so there was plenty of light. I used a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS (not the new second-generation one, though) on the 7D and a 300mm f/4L on my 40D. Both cameras were set to record raw files and were processed in Lightroom 2.6.Pluses:- Drastically better color rendition for certain shades. One of the cars at the autocross was a BMW M3 in Phoenix Yellow, a particularly awful shade of yellow-green. The 7D got it almost exactly right. The 40D rendered it as more of a dull dusty yellow with almost no green to it. The colors were so far apart that at first I thought they were different cars when I was going through the frames afterwards.- AF was improved over the 40D. I used the AF mode that uses one AF point plus its vertical and horizontal neighbors and that worked pretty well tracking quickly moving cars. I wouldn't call its accuracy a dramatic improvement over the 40D for this particular style of shooting, but it's definitely better.- The grip was a marginal improvement for my large hands. I think it would be more of an improvement for smaller hands.- Big, bright viewfinder.- The main LCD screen is great, even in bright sun.- The new button layout and button "feel" is nice. Bigger buttons are easier to work with in gloves, though that wasn't an issue on this particular day.- The electronic level seems pretty sensitive. I'm not sure how useful it will be, but there it is. I haven't had much trouble getting my horizons level without an electronic level.- 1080p video is nice, but I don't have the audio equipment to make good use of it. Don't think that getting a camera that shoots 1080p will turn you into a videographer overnight.- Aside from the squeaky door, the body feels pleasantly heavy and very solid.Minuses:- Significantly grainier images than the 40D, even at ISO 100. I was shocked at how bad the grain was. After seeing how bad the noise was, I immediately packed up the camera to return it. The noise is simply atrocious.- Pixel for pixel, the 7D is a little softer than the 40D. This is well known; see other online reviews of the 7D.So there you have it. It's a great camera to use as long as you never intend to look at the pictures it takes (or don't have very high standards). Maybe the one I got was defective... who knows. I'm waiting for the next generation of bodies.Update:Take a look at a full-size shot: [...] (Amazon censors URLs in reviews. See the comments for how to access the sample images.)Make sure to view it at 100%. As stated above in the review, the 7D does have very good color rendition, so don't hold the muted colors in this shot against it. This shot was converted with ufraw which doesn't have good color defaults for the 7D. Lightroom 2.6 renders colors accurately with the default camera profiles (though Lightroom's raw conversions also exhibit the same noise, so that's not just from ufraw). The side panels of the car are especially easy to see noise in.

I shoot a lot of portraits and sports. I have a 5D Mark II, and specialize in large, canvas close up portraits of children in 24 x 30 and up sizes. However, I also shoot alot of sports and bought the 7D because of the claimed 8 fps burst speed, dual Digic 4 processors, and much more advance auto focus system. For the first few months, it performed as advertised as long as there was sufficient light. Fantastic baseball photos with three or four tack-sharp images per pitch, and two to three sharp images of a single swing by a batter. The camera was not so great, however, for indoor sports. As expected, the 7D's low-light performance lags significantly, and image quality cannot compare to the powerhouse 5D Mark II in low light. Burst speed was considerably lower and images were noisy.One day, for no discernable reason, burst speed dropped to 3 or 4 frames per second even in bright light and stayed there. I eliminated all user-correctable causes for this, and eventually shipped the camera back to Canon for service. I received the camera back working fine again with a page out the instruction manual, blown up to 8 x 10 size, and marked with yellow highlighter on the instructions for setting the camera to burst mode, I suppose as Canon's way of saying I was an idiot.The bottom line for me is that the 7D will be a wonderful performer for someone stepping up from a 50D or a Rebel. It is great for action shots in good light, assuming one doesn't have the same issues I've had with the burst speed. For outdoor sports shooters, the 7D is fantastic. However, despite what you may read on the Net, image quality on this crop sensor simply cannot compare to the 5D Mark II for portrait or landscape work. The 7D's low-light performance is also weak compared to the 5DII. For an extra 30%, you can get what I believe to be one of the finest DSLR's available anywhere, at any price, in the 5D Mark II. If you shoot portraits or in low light, the 7D just cannot compare.I look forward to the next generation 5D, which I anticipate will have the 7D's auto focus system. Now THAT will be a truly drool-worthy combination.

This was bought as a surprise Christmas gift for my wife, who is the photographer in the family. So since she knows all the technical stuff - and I'm more of an observer than an actual user - but I hope this helps.First off - the way I ended up with this camera was my wife had a Canon Rebel (and some lenses) that she had for two years. She's an avid photohog and is tinkering with the idea of doing it for money, but needed an upgrade. I thumbed through Consumer Reports and found that this 7D is rated as hands-down the best consumer-level DSLR on the market. It cited many reasons that this model was the best, but frankly I forgot them all.My wife however was flirting with the idea of a Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera because she was considering a professional track. When back home over the holidays she was talking to a photographer in the family who has 3 of the 5Ds and talked her out of that model. The major difference in the two (with the 5D being nearly a thousand bucks more expensive) was that the 7D does not have a crop sensor. That's about it from what I gathered from our conversation with the professional photographer.Other observations:-The pictures that she has taken are great - Just great. This will depend on the skills of the photographer and the lenses you use of course, but in the hands of someone who knows that they are doing - I can see a marked improvement in pictures from the old Canon Rebel.-I hear the video is a little complicated to use, and I haven't seen any footage yet, but I don't think the average person is buying this as a video camera.The four our of five stars for the ease of use is based on moving up from another Canon DSLR. For the first-time user who is looking for a nice camera but has never used anything more than a point-an-shoot - I would recommend starting off smaller (unless you really do just have so much money that you don't care). The two years that she spent taking pictures on the Rebel have really paid off. Plus they say that a camera body has a finite number of shutter clicks - sp better for her to get the first two years out of the way on a learner camera.All and all my wife is uber-pleased with it and as a result, so am I. The price on Amazon was as good as any retailer in the area, plus I cashed in on free shipping and no tax. I really couldn't have asked for more from Amazon. Best part is - This was bought during Christmas time, ad I never had to leave the house to get the perfect gift.

I recorded an entire web series using nothing but the Canon 7d, Canon 60d, and Canon T2i. VIDEO RECORDING mode is pretty much identical for each; the menu's and button configurations are the only major differences (again, when it comes to VIDEO, I don't use any of them for photography). Everything in the series was shot with the kit 18-135mm IS lens (on all three).From shot to shot there is no difference, but when it comes to durability, the 7d takes the cake with a sturdier build meant to resist both weather and physical damage - to a degree (those who like to recreationally shoot their cameras with bullets should rethink this selection)When it comes to fit, feel, and menus, my OPINION is that the 60d is far superior. Its only slightly smaller than the 7d but has button configurations and menus that are much easier to navigate than the T2i or 7d counterpart.T2i gets size (smaller, if you're into that sort of thing) and price - seeing as its considerably less expensive.Keeping things short: if you're looking into DSLRs specifically for video, I'd say 60d > 7d > T2i; but primarily for personal reasons. All of them record with the same image quality when it comes to video. So burgeoning filmmakers, these three have NO NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCES when it comes to image quality (I hope that saves some people some time)I'm certainly not above a little self promotion, though...[...]BAM!If anyone has specific questions about any of the Dslrs mentioned, just ask and I'll tell you what I can. I know if you're shopping around for stuff there are always a dozen little questions that you can't quite seem to find the answer for.

By now you've probably read a ton of reviews... here or elsewhere on the internet about this camera. I've had it for a few months, upgrading from a Canon Rebel Xsi and finally decided to do a review, now that I have experience with it and really have had a chance to put it through it's paces. I'll try to keep my review based TOTALLY on my own personal experiences, and not just regurgitate the words everybody else has already said about this camera. I'm going to spread this review out into a couple of lists, then a short question and answer section... so here goes!What's hot?* Large, 18 megapixel images* Great low-light performance at high iso's* Fast* Automatic White Balance does a much better job than my Xsi ever did.* Rugged/Solid* Feels very "significant" in your hands and comfortable to hold* Automatic Focus is highly configurable to your situational needs and performs VERY well (in comparison to any previous camera I've owned)* Remote flash triggering* Movie modes are neat (I don't play with them much however... I'm more a photographer than videographer)* Most "professional" ASP-C sensor camera yet.* Shares batteries with the 5Dmark ii.* Penti-prism 100% view is amazing. Much brighter and more useful, to me, in framing a shot than the penti-mirror design of the Rebel series.* Micro-adjustment for individual lenses is awesome.What's not?* Rebel T2i has it's sensor, iso range, movie modes, a bigger and more detailed screen, and a "dumbed-down" version of the 7D's auto-focus... at about $1000 less.* If you're used to a Rebel camera (or point-and-shoot), the weight will be very noticeable after a while.* ExpensiveQuestions and answers:Q: Would this be a "good camera" for me to buy as my first step into the DSLR realm?A: No. More accurately... probably not. This camera is complex, and it should be. It's as professional as the ASP-C camera's get... and it's in the xD lineup. If you aren't familiar with basic camera functions... something that takes this many steps beyond "basic" will either be frustrating, or wasted by always sitting in the "automatic" setting on the dial. I would, instead, recommend you look at the Canon Rebel T2i! It's got many of the specs of this camera, at a much cheaper price point. It's lighter, smaller, and more beginner/intermediate friendly.Q: Should I get this camera over the Rebel T2i?A: Depends totally on your use of a camera. Need something light, friendly, very capable, and a great value? Rebel all the way. Need something with a super-fast shutter, rugged build quality, and a few very advanced features? Go with the 7D.Q: Which lens should I get with the 7D?A: Totally depends on what you want to do and what you need it for. I chose the 28-135mm. So far, it's not a bad little piece of glass. That seems to be about the standard idea on all the "kit" lens options. Looking back, I probably could have saved myself some cash by buying the body only and used it to buy some REALLY GOOD glass. The sensor on this camera has an nearly un-satiable hunger for sharpness. You won't see it's true potential without amazing optics.Final word: If you need a blazing fast, rugged, Canon camera and you're willing to really go through it's complexities and wring every last ounce of "Awesome" out of it... in the ASP-C format... this is it. If you want to save some money and/or are just getting into the world of DSLR's... I'd pass this one by. I made my choice, and I don't regret it.

This is a great camera to get if you are wanting to both record video and take pictures. The pictures turn out amazing and the video is in 1080 HD. You can even take pictures while recording video (even though it will pause the recording for 2-3 seconds).The only thing I don't like about this camera is that there is no auto focus when recording video.I would recommend this camera to people who are interested in buying a DSLR.

I've been a Canon user all my life. This camera takes an awesome image. The quality and speed is amazing. It even shoots faster than the 5D Mark III - Which I found interesting. I highly recommend this mid level camera. The 1st body I received, I noticed a stuck red pixel on the CMOS, Amazon cross shipped me a new 7D in 2 days. Best service ever.

Many people write reviews right after they get a product so they don't always note when something goes wrong down the line. I have had my Canon 7D now for well over a year and can happily report that it is by far the best camera I have ever owned (and I have had many)! It has never had a single problem, the battery seems to last forever (seriously, I use it daily and I think I charge it once every month or two, after thousands of shots), and the images are spectacular. I have a number of Canon lenses including the 24-105L/f4 that I use the most as well as a 50mm/f1.4 and the incredible 100mmL macro lens from Canon. I also have a wide angle lens that I use hardly ever. I am a semi-pro and have been shooting since high school (about 25 years now). I photograph nature most often (as well as my immediate family on a daily basis, including a squirmy toddler). It works very well as a "point and shoot" as well so I can hand it to my daughter on all automatic settings and she gets superb photographs out of it every time. I shoot mostly on A-priority or manual. The controls are very intuitive (12yo has no problems figuring everything out). I download my photos into Lightroom and catalog/edit there. Very easy to manage my thousands of photos this way. Cannot recommend this camera or the Canon L lenses highly enough! Worth every penny.

I bought this camera as a complete newbie to photography. My sum total of knowledge about photography was: keep extraneous junk out of the shot, fill the frame with your subject, and... that's it. I took pictures with my Olympus C740 UZ in full auto mode, and could not tell you the difference between an f-stop and a flame thrower. However, my plan was to become an accomplished amateur photographer ASAP. Once the camera was on order I got Bryan Peterson's book, "Understanding Exposure" and read it cover to cover. Wow! If you consider yourself a beginner, get this book today. Read its' reviews here on Amazon, this is what you need to understand a tremendous amount about photography in, literally, the first half an hour of reading. So, because of that book, I was not the least bit intimidated by the EOS 7D, and was up and running taking pictures immediately. And, by the way, the mode dial has been in aperture priority, shutter priority, or manual since day one. As far as I'm concerned, "auto" and "creative auto" don't exist. I went from knowing absolutely nothing about photography to having a firm grasp of the essentials in a week, with this camera and Bryan Peterson's book. As a complement to the camera I also got at the same time Doug Sahlin's book, "Canon EOS 7D for Dummies". It is an excellent accompaniment to the camera manual, and, like Peterson's book, full of good general photography basics. If you have anything on the ball at all, you can become a photographer with this camera and those two books. From this base, you can then continue to hone your skills and learn forever. So my point is not to talk about the camera, but to tell any beginner they can use THIS camera starting from a base of no knowledge and with diligent study learn very quickly. If it is in your budget, you don't need to go from a point and shoot to a "bridge" camera to a DSLR. If you are serious, want to learn, and have the scratch, you can start right here.I have had this camera for eight days and learned and practiced the following things I never knew in that time: What f-stop is and how it affects depth of field; how to use shutter speed to stop or imply motion; what ISO is and how it can affect picture quality; how white balance works and when and how to modify it; using exposure compensation and exposure bracketing, and how to combine those with filters in unusual lighting situations; when and why to use a tripod with slow shutter speeds; how to take great macros without a macro lens using a 50 mm prime lens and an extension tube; how to use direct flash, bounce flash, fill flash, ring flash, and off camera flash for macros, portraits etc. to eliminate shadows and balance exposures. Why you don't use a wide angle lens for portraits! The list goes on but the point is you can do it too. So don't be afraid to buy a "scary" camera, just roll up your sleeves and learn. Also, get a Cotton Carrier to carry the camera around, you don't want this thing hanging on your neck! Cotton Carrier is a vest that securely clips the camera to your chest, it is a necessity in my opinion, put Cotton Carrier in a search engine and peruse his website. I took a "Macro Walk" yesterday with it and it is the best! No sore neck.Anyway if you want to know more about the camera itself there is plenty of info here, but I just want beginners to know you can succeed with this awesome machine.

A short while ago, I sold all my Olympus gear to go with Canon. I was choosing between 5d mk ii and 7d. 5d mk ii has many benefits, including very good IQ with its full frame sensor. However, I decided to go with the 7d because I need to have a very responsive camera for sports and fast travel photography.7d is super responsive. Auto-focus is much better than the 5d mk ii. It is fast and very accurate. It is excellent for sports photography. Ergonomic is excellent. I feel so comfortable holding it, even though it is slightly heavier than a 5d mk ii.When combined with an excellent L lens, the IQ delivered is excellent. You can see many sample images on Amazon.For anyone who doesn't have the $ to go with 5d mk iii, 7d is a very good choice, if you don't need superior low light performance that the 5d mk iii provides.

Nice camera it does the job and has a great picture and you can use it for many different products .

I bought the 7D after spending a lot of time comparing offers and saving $$, so I was very happy when I got it but problems are already rising.The body itself is good and delivering, but the lens that came with it arrived with a defect -the zoom is too loose, it keeps 'falling'.I had to go to Europe to shoot shortly after I purchased the body + lens and couldn't afford to send the lens back. But recently a weird sound started coming from what I initially thought was the body and turned out to be the lens. The sound is literally taking over and it killed a whole inside shoot I made where dialogs were recorded with a Rode Mic. (that's when I realized something was going on)I haven't had yet the chance to send it back to Canon, and hopefully the guarantee will work out (i don't see why it wouldn't really) But it is such a hassle to buy something, receive a low quality product and then have to spend time, energy and money to send it back, have it fix, contact them etc.

About me: Pro videographer semi pro photographer 15 + years.I spend over $25k a year on photography gear. This has been the worst purchase of my entire career.Out of the box my 7D was shooting stills with only 6 stops of latitude on the "super flat" setting, even less on "neutral" with contrast all the way down. The RAW images look nothing like the LCD and are completely different than represented in the histogram. I have to boost the RAW files 100% in photoshop to get them to look like they look on the LCD/histogram.I shot a comprehensive test side by side with my assistants 7d with the following parameters:Controlled flat/soft lighting.All exact same settings (superflat mode, all image enhancements off ect)17-55mm 2.8 lenseTiffen 20 step greyscale chartMonitor properly calibrated and tweeked ever so slightly for a flatter look.Test result here: Flickr search "Nomadtv" (DPP raw files opened on same monitor + mac book)The results are easily apparent to an untrained eye let alone a client, the control camera shoots well over the 10 stops latitude represented on the greyscale chart. I would dare to say its 11 stops or more.My camera could not hold detail in the first 5 to 6 bands and started to loose detail on the upper 2 bands... minimum of 4 to 5 stops less latitude than the control camera.There is obviously a massive difference between the two units.Support (lack there of):Sent to canon with detailed description and a print out of the 2 test images side by side in DPP, camera was gone over 2 weeks and I had to rent (almost $1k lost)Camera came back saying it was within specification and nothing was done to it.Took it out of the box and it is still shooting super contrasty.I again called canon, asked for a manager - Got "Marvin"I explained everything that happened and he was unsympathetic. Said he'd call me back. Never did.I called him back next day and was asked to send the RAW files over. The email he gave me was wrong. He never called me back.Called again the next day and found him, he immediately put me on the phone with "Randy" who is apparently a "photographer". Randy had me send him the RAW files and despite trying to get off the phone with me several times right away, I insisted that he stay with me while he looked at these test shots.He immediately noted that there was a difference between the two. We went through the metadata. The only thing that was different was a slight difference in focal length. Randy proceeded to try to convince me that a slight focal difference could account for the vast difference in image quaility. Are you kidding me on a $1100 Lens, It better not!Randy said he would send this back to "Marvin" right away. Marvin never called me back (no suprise).Next day I called marvin again in the afternoon and was told that "they" couldn't see much difference between the 2 cameras and that they would not be servicing the camera. I asked him point blank "So you're telling me that I'm on my own?" to which he replied "Basically, but you can call the 800 customer support number, thank you for calling canon support, have a good day"So I now have a $1600 paper weight with $3500 in lenses and other add ons that are useless to me.Moral of the story?BEWARE CANON!You are on your own if you buy from them.

I hope this may help a prospective buyer. I remember my first big buy years ago the canon 2Ae, I was going for the Nikon that was in the same class as the Canon 2Ae. Nikon was double the prize compared the Canon's simi pro version. Being an college student I went for the cheaper version, Canon. It turn out be one of the best investments. It was loaded with tons of features and the camera did stuff I didn't think was possible. I got amazing picture from that camera. It was well worth it, I got more then my money worth. I feel the same way again about Canon 7D. Canon has done it again. It is definatelly a game changer in the DSLR war of competition. this Camera is more then a Simi-pro, it has lots of feature that give the user more control and customize to his or her preference in how they will use it. Mind you it sound scarey with so many feature, yet I didn't need to read the manual to figure it out except for a few advance features. The Other area of concern I read about was high ISO setting which I found work great up to 3200 which is very high. However it works best with canon lens to get the high iso quality images. This brings me to another point I want to address. There are so many mixed reviews and it was really hard to decide. One thing that helps, is you have to find a reputible web sights that use a more objective reviews. One Sight I highly recommend is Photozone. A couple years ago someone sold me on sigma lens and even told me that there were minut difference in len quality comparison with Nikon and Canon that the human eye would not be able to decern. Well one thing was right Sigma does make some good quality lens compare to some low end brands out their. I even got rid of all those cheap brand lens cause non of them match the quality of Sigma. Only now I have I found after doing some test on the canon 7D comparing canon angainst Sigma it was far more sharper and I was able to go higher ISO. Higher quality lens make all the difference. Take a look at Photozone which is a good place to find good reviews. SO for those who complain that theirs is not sharp enough check out your lens. If your going to get a Pro camera then you might as well invest in a couple high quality lens to go with it.

used camera rarely but took it to norway with a fish eye lens to take photos of the fjords and it gave an error 20 and would not work. i sent it in for service when i returned home and to repair was $500 more than a new 7d. i will try to change to nikon. anyone want to buy some canon lenses? do not buy canon because they cannot fix their products at a reasonable price.

On it's merits, it's a fantastic camera that is well covered in other reviews here. If you're trying to decide between this and the 5D Mark II, here's some thoughts to consider.The 7D is nearly identical to the 5D in terms of specs, in fact beats it in a few areas:- dual DIGIC processors on the 7D means 2X faster continuous shooting of 18MP RAW stills (the 7D shoots 8fps, just slightly behind the 10fps of their $5k cameras!)- the 7D has a much better, much improved auto-focus system vs. the 5D- when shooting video and monitoring on an HD monitor, the 7D works as expected, whereas the 5D drops the signal to standard definition when you hit record, so you're seeing the wrong size and aspect ratio while you film.In the end, the 5D's only real advantage is its full frame sensor, which will deliver slightly reduced noise, more narrow depth of field and, since there is no cropping, a 50mm lens is 50mm. Those are pretty much the three benefits of the 5D over the 7D. The depth of field issue is the one most often mentioned by those of us who use these cameras for shooting video, but consider this - a crop sensor is roughly 25x17mm, and motion picture film is 22x19mm. In essence, this means you're getting depth of field very similar to what audiences are used to seeing in feature films with the 7D.The 5D Mark II is almost $1,000 more, so you really have to ask yourself if that extra sensor size is worth it to you. To me, the 7D represents the absolute best balance of cost and performance on the market.

I bought this for my wife to replace her aging Canon Rebel xTi. Relatively this camera is a huge jump in technology and ease of use. She loves the new camera and the new pictures are great. She has recently started a photography business with a partner so they have had several different types of shoots in different lighting etc. The camera has performed amazingly. It is fast, focus is great and the pictures come out great. She is using a Tamron lens on it (I cannot remember the specs on the lens but I will update this post when I find out). Overall she is very happy with the camera and the little I have used it I have been impressed. I recommend this camera.