Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Mark III

I have been using a 5D for about 5 years now. There is so much more to the 5DMIII than the 5D. But I suspect I will have a great time learning all about it as I go. So far just family photos and Portraits. I am looking forward to my next trip to Shoot everything. Canon did it right this time. I have not even used the Video side of this yet. I have been shooting for 30 years now. Weddings, Birthdays, and some Studio. I am really happy with the balance and abilities I have with this camera. Yea it has noise in the high ASA but I have never seen a camera that did not even Nikon. For me this is an all around camera I can use it in my studio with everything set up right and I can use it on the go to Sports events with natural lighting. I can't wait to get out there again.

Well, coming from Nikon I have to say this is the best camera I have ever used. In the past 3-4 months I have had a number of cameras which I returned until I ended up staying with this. From the T4i, D5200, D300, D600, D800, 60D. The 5D Mark III was the pick, yes it was the more expensive (by the way, I got it way cheaper HERE than it is now, at the time of my review its listed for 3.8~3.9k, I bought it with the kit lens for 3.4k!)I have to say it is an amazing tool. Believe the other longer reviews, this is the REAL DEAL camera.

The Canon 5D Mark III is a true superstar! It has impressive capabilities for both still and video shooting with incredible image quality with a fast and accurate AF system. It also gives me very cool configuration ability and great frame coverage. I'm still learning all it's features and creative nuances. My next thing to try is the HDR feature. I'll let you know how that turns out.

The Canon EOS 5D Mark III is a super camera easily supporting business or personal use. The technical improvements supported by this camera make it easier for a non-professional to produce quality photos.

i use the body and grip the cost is less than full studio version of canon body. and to me i like the grip better than whole body. i don't know why. Grip is bigger I suppose to my eyes. But most of all, I like to be able to use battery that I am using for 7D for power I get on 5Dmark3.

I bought a 5D mark ii in 2011, sold it and missed it from day one. I recently purchased the mark iii and I have to say that I will not be selling for quit some time. The settings were easy to navigate and the dials are all in familiar places for the most part. The new zoom requires an extra keypress but I found it better to use the wheel than the old zoom in/out buttons once you get used to it. The new rate button on the left side seemed a bit useless to me but I reprogrammed it to protect images. The LCD was big and bright and shows lots of crisp detail when zooming in. Also very usable for macro with it's quick focus zoom. The best LCD I have ever seen on a camera. The Viewfinder also big and bright. Huge improvement over what you see using a cropped sensor. This is one of the many reasons I picked up another full frame.

I've been doing set photography for feature films for almost to years. Digitally speaking I went from a Canon 1D, to the 7D, to 5D Mark III.Anyone looking to upgrade from the 7D has a tough decision on their hands, as the 7D is a great camera. After reading hundreds of reviews, I decided to make it happen.All I can say is WOW! I use Lightroom to edit all photos taken ~ brighten eyes, soften skin, etc. Instead of spending hours in Lightroom, I was able to turn the photos around in a fraction of the time. The clarity is undeniable. I was able to crop the photos and not lose any sharpness (to the naken eye).I performed a quick comparison between the two cameras using my Canon 100mm f2.8L IS USM. This comparison really doesn't do the 5D3 justice, but at least it will give you a good idea of the clarity, color, brightness, crop factor variation and sharpness difference between the two cameras.Hope you find this useful, as I would have during my comparision shopping.

Is the Mark III a better camera than the Mark II? Yes. But if the extra money is a deal breaker to you, get the Mark II while you still can and put the money into some fast lenses. Otherwise, this camera is a no-brainer. Higher MP, VASTLY increased ISO, better native resolution, bigger lcd screen and better res, weights 100g more (one of the few negatives), better viewfinder coverage, more movie formatting options, HDR, focus points vastly increased, shutter lag halved, battery life increased by 100 shots, continuous shooting up 35% - from 3.9fps to 6fps, 2 stoarage slots instead of 1, and now accepts SD cards along with CompactFlash Type 1.

Like i said, i used to be a nikon guy, but on paper, this looked perfect (perfect amount of pixels, perfect amount of focus points, perfect burst rate for me)...so i took a leap of faith since the d800 was a bit of an overkill on the pixels with less frames per seconds, and i had the d600, but it had problems with spots on the sensor, and you will had all the focus points cramped on the middle, you will have to focus and move alot.... not cool.... if you are looking to buy this, you probably already did your research, but let me tell you, this thing feels solid in your hands, and everything you need its at your finger tips (literally), in a matter of seconds; you can adjust the shutter, aperture, focus mechanism, k scale... i absolutely love this camera!

Not gonna waste time state the obvious...its an awesome camera and if your thinking about getting it...dont wait...get it now...

This is the most capable, wonderful camera! I started with a Canon point & shoot years ago, progressed to a Rebel xti, then to a 5D Mark II. Now I have reached the pinnacle, I think. The only way I would ever buy another camera would be if they got all the capabilities of the Mark III into a lighter camera.

I recently acquired the Canon 5D Mark III with the intention of replacing my 7D. I primarily shoot indoors and in low-light conditions and I hate to use flash (I have a 580 EX II but it is a pain to lug around and I have not mastered the use of flash). I have been taking photos under ISO 6400 and it is MUCH better than the 7D which would look very flat and grainy at ISO 3200. I have also used it in daylight using the 70-200 2.8 IS II, wide open at running subjects and the focus is spot on, even with a calculated DOF of about 2 cm. As much praise the 7D autofocus system got, it has NOTHING on the 5D3. The silent mode is simply amazing! The 7D silent mode was a pain to use - requiring 2 clicks and was slow to operate. The 5D3 continuous silent mode is a huge improvement and is less distracting to the subjects.Pro:1) Autofocus is wonderful. Beware that this much power and flexibility does come with a learning curve.2) Silent mode is easy to use and makes it much less noticeable/distracting.3) Low light ability is unparallelled in this price bracket4) What banding? I cannot say that it does not exist, but in the processing I have done so far, it is NOT an issue, unlike what I easily saw in the 5D2.5) Ability to adjust micro-focus on both tele and wide ends of zoom lenses. AFAIK, this feature is limited to the 1DX and 5DIII.Cons:1) Cost: it ain't cheap. However, it really is like a mini 1DX.2) Less dynamic range and fewer MP than the Nikon D800. However, this is hard to see on most monitors and impossible to see in regular print unless you do HDR or push the exposure.3) A few glitches like the hard to see autofocus point in the dark. This should be fixable with a firmware update (hint, hint Canon).

So many nice changes and easy to use...it is hard to find the screen cover size for it. But the pictures are great.

5D Mark iii is a fine camera, but I don't think that it is worth the upgrade if you already have 7d or 5d Mark ii or 1d Mark IV. I have two reasons:1) Low light focus, you get full frame, better focus (even though the low light is not that great - I tried at ISO 25600, the focus went crazy. I can't get it focused at all). Comparing my old 5d mark ii, it is no better. It is only better when the light is good and the object being shot is moving then Mark iii performs better). My 1d Mark IV is actually quicker in focusing though at 16 meg pixel. True, the IOS quality has been raised from 6400 to 12800 low light wise between 1d mark iv and 5d mark iii. You still need a flash to have a good picture at ISO 12800 for 5d Mark III. The occasion of shooting at this low light is not that common, say maybe 10-20% of your overall shooting. I see improvement but not big enough to buy Mark iii instead of Mark II. Buying a used 1D Mark IV can be a better idea if you are talking about low light shooting and auto focus.2) Cost - 7d is less than 2k, new 1d mark IV is 4.5K, Nikon d800 is 3k (with flash, better low light, faster focus). After looked at the features and the images taken, I am not sold on 5d Mark III. It is good but not good enough to be $500 than D800, $1.75k more than 7d. The full frame is fine but unless you develop pictures that big, 1.3x or 1.6x offered by 1d mark iv and 7d are enough for you if we talk about the picture quality only.Pros - more focus points, 3.2 view finder, better video, better weather protectionCons - not worth the 1k premium over 5d mark II or 1.75k over 7d, low light focus in need of improvement, not features competitive with Nikon d800I returned mine and decide to keep my 1d mark iv and wait for the next upgrade opportunity.

Upgraded to this camera from my old Rebel XTi 10.1 MP, definitely worth every penny. The quality of light metering is quite precise, as well as the readings are spot on. The quality of video is amazing, Canon has really pushed it this time, but when shooting video, it does take a toll on the battery and I had to load mine up with a dual battery pack grip in order to accommodate for the toll. Also, the videos are quite large in file size, even in the simpler definition. Therefore in order to make up for that, had to acquire a larger capacity memory card. On the other hand the quality of audio is quite impressive, considering that I have only used the internal microphone so far. All around, this is a great piece of equipment for both photo, as well as video shoots.

This is my second Canon 5D Mark lll .This camera is perfect for the type of photography that I do . I gives the closest thing to a Canon 1D Mark X without the price tag of almost 7 grand .In fact it allows me to have 2 cameras and 2 lenes (24-104mm F4.0 L) for close to the price of a 1D Mark X .Awesome deal Canon and Amazon with the rebates . The camera was and lens kit was about the same as just the camera when it was first announced.

Have had this camera for a month now and hands down, it's the best in it's class.Ergonomically, it just works. Buttons are where they belong, everything is lightening fast and spot on.Sure - it's pricey, but if you're in the market for this camera you already know that it's not for everyone.Crazy-high ISO pictures are a no-brainer and very little grain, even at ISO 25,600 !Focus system is second to none.The LCD is far beyond my old 40D.WHat I especially appreciate is my older lenses not only work flawlessly on it, but the camera makes these lenses look better than ever.I've long been a fan of the Canon 28-135 and it now looks better than ever!A little disappointd that Canon did not opt to have built-in WiFi as the 6D has, but if that's my biggest gripe...Quit reading and go get it!!!

this camera really works.great quality pictures without noisewas not heavy either compared to other cameras.impressive! worth of every penny

I love the way they manage the deal to their costumers. I love this compact and beautiful designed of SLR camera. It's a perfect and powerful for PRO.

I have had quite a number of Canon cameras over the years and this one is a show-stopper. The only downside is that being full-frame very few of you older lenses will work with it...in fact, none of mine did.

Had it for a few weeks, and it has been a dream. Took a while to get used to the controls, which could be expected coming from a t2i. Its a complete different experience from the lower level camera. Very Pleased

Got mine delivered quickly by Amazon. Pckg was good. Opened & tried it. I was getting blurred pictures especially at wider aperture setting. Decided to do a micro-adjustment. Managed to do it at full telephoto but 24mm it was impossible. Pictures were too blurry. Called up Canon to send it in. I had to pay postage to ship it to Canon ($50 with insurance). Canon fixed the issue. The lens was not focusing right so they replaced some parts. Next Canon fixed the overexposure & shutter speed calibration on the camera. Finally got a proper working camera. This is a hassle. You are paying $3500 for an eqpt that you would expect to work right out of the box. I guess companies don't focus on product quality anymore but try to sell as much as they can.

Having had a Canon EOS 20D for about 8 years, I needed to move into the present and get a more capable and more updated camera. After some debate, I chose the 5D Mark III. I am still learning the new features but it has not been a disappointment. Being Winter, I haven't had a lot of opportunity to use it often but when I do, it is amazing! The LCD on the back is very big and I can see it even in sun light. There are some functions that I am not accustomed to yet but I don't see any problems getting proficient in a short time. If you have the money and want a high end Canon camera, consider the EOS 5D Mark III. It lives up to it's reputation.

This camera is intended for advanced amateurs and professionals. It will not make your facebook photos magically better than you phone, if anything it will make it much more easier to screw up a photo if you are not sure what you are doing. In short, stop reading if photography is not a current/future hobby / profession. You will be better served by many fantastic cameras like Nex 7 / Nikon One / G1X.If you are not invested in canon gear and are just starting out, take a serious look at Nikon D800. It is a superb camera and may be better in some ways (higher resolution & dynamic range, lower price). I shoot canon because used glass is much cheaper and readily available, specially at super telephoto end. Find me a Mint Nikon 300 f2.8 VR for < 4k and we can talk ;-)For the rest, save your money and get this camera. The AF improvement ( It has a 90%+ success rate for a 4 year kid running towards the camera vs 40% on MKII using the same glass. Much easier to catch birds in flight even with f5.6 glass), 6 Fps (plenty of FPS for weekend BIF warrior / Sports photographer, AF during video using AF button, better high ISO capability (combined with low light AF) is completely worth the price of admission. In just 1 week I have had this guy, I have taken 5+ shots that I would miss with my 5D MKII. This includes super dim club setting salsa dancing, late evening kiddo playing with slides, live view shots from the hip.Yes it is priced @ $3500, higher than MKII. But once you see the performance of the AF, the price of entry gets easily justified. (Just for reference it has the same AF as the upcoming pro camera 1DX and it is performing better than any other canon AF to date, not just the 5 series based on user input).