Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body

i am constantly amazed by the pictures i get from this camera. i love the extra width i get from full frame as well as the extra shallow depth of field. i'm a wedding/portrait photographer and this camera is beyond amazing for what i do.if you shoot high ISO, you can't beat this camera at the moment. i shoot ISO 6400 like it's ISO 1600, it is that clean. and ISO 3200 is the new ISO 800 for me, i don't even hesitate. i will not go above ISO 6400 though as you'll start to see banding.the lcd has me spoiled, so much so that i'm selling my 40d so that i can either get a 50d or the new 7d. on the 40d all of the pictures just look blah...and blurry. they still turn out good on the computer, but it can be very frustrating at the time. on the 5d II, you can tell right away if you've misfocused or if your exposure is off.video quality is amazing though i don't really use it for that.autofocus is better than people like to give it credit for. i shoot mainly dimly lit receptions and it locks perfect whenever i need it to. i'm talking ISO 6400 f/1.6 1/30s dim. also i have no problem using outer focus points as they work great as well.manual focus is a cinch with the 5d II. if you put the camera in live view, move the small box over what you want to focus on, then push the zoom button twice to see that box at pixel level. focus the lens and shoot away.lenses used are 35mm f/1.4L, 85mm f/1.8, 16-35mm f/2.8L I, and 70-200mm f/2.8L IS.if you need high ISO and want full frame, this is the camera for you. if you don't need either, save some money and get the 50d or 7d...or even a used 40d.

I have done photography in the past with High Quality Canon film cameras and lenses for magazines. I decided to get back into photography and purchase the Canon D5 Mark ll. I found the camera Large, Heavy, Over Priced, and the Quality of the photos taken at 21.1 mega pix was poor and darker than at a normal photo would be taken in auto mode. My 10year old Sony 5.0 mega pix takes better photos.This Camera is not for a person that is a beginner or not knowledgeable in Photography. The HD video is good quality, however unless you use a Tripod or compensating lense, the video is shakey on playback.I was very disappointed in this camera.

LOVE THIS CAMERA. IS EVERYTHING I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE AND MUCH MORE. MY IMAGES ARE SPECTACULAR EVERYWHERE I GO, AND IT IS SO EASY AFTER HAVING MY "BEGINNING TRAINING" IN A CANON REBEL XTI WHICH I GOT YEARS AGO. 4105 LENS IS AWESOME.AND IT CAME TO MY DOOR IN LITTLE TOWN MIDDLE OF NOWHERE IN 21 HOURS AFTER I ORDERED IT. IF YOU DO ORDER A CAMERA FROM AMAZON AND THEY GIVE YOU A LIST OF ACCESSORIES, BE CERTAIN THEY FIT THE SIZE OF YOUR LENS. I BOUGHT A LENS THAT WAS OE THE LIST AND IT WAS WRONG SIZE DUE TO MY IGNORANCE AND SPPED OF ORDERING. I HAD ORDERED A 7 D FROM ANOTHER CAMERA DISTRIBUTOR AND SENT IT BACK AFTER 2 DAYS. AND ORDERED THIS ONE FROM AMAZON BECAUSE THEY WERE SO SPEEDY AND I HAD TO LEAVE ON TRIP IN TWO DAYS.SO HAD GREAT PHOTO TRIP OVER 2400 PHOTOS IN 3 WEEKS EVEN WITHOUT MY UV FILTER.

The Canon 5D Mark II really hits a new portion of the market- it's really a professional level DSLR at a price accessible to shutterbugs, photography enthusiasts, and independent filmmakers. The camera features an incredible Full Frame CMOS sensor that does very well in low light...this sensor is, in fact, larger than that of the Red One 4K Cinema camera, which costs approximately $17,000 (please note that I am not comparing these two cameras- they really do serve two VERY different purposes).Canon really made a step in the right direction with this camera. It provides quality, functionality, ease of use, and the accessibility of professional level products to those with shallower pockets. This camera has been great for everything from candid family shots, to shooting great videos of trips to Europe, family gathers, etc.While the still photos are incredible and the video rivals that of exponentially more expensive HD cameras, the only things keeping this camera from being much better with video is the processor and the write speed. I think we can, however, expect to see Canon focus on this in the near future. They do provide great user requested features in their firmware updates, which is more than can be said by most prosumer/professional electronics manafacturers.I would absolutely recommend this camera to anyone who is looking for a camera that does it all without having to cost more than the car they drive.

If you've made it this far you're basically looking for encouragement to buy this camera - not for actual information. I can offer encouragement.

I've been a working professional for my entire life and have spent fortunes on gear. I own a complete Hasselblad H3DII system and that system was so good I sold my entire backup Canon EOS 1Ds MkII system since it simply wasn't good enough for ad campaigns. This camera still isn't as good as the Hasselblad but it's close - close enough that I use it a lot. The video function however puts it in another realm altogether. It's got issues with sound but as I make my transition to moving images this camera is helping the process. The camera needs manual level controls for the audio and it needs firewire for shooting tethered - USB is so slow it's worthless. Those are my complaints.

I consider it my Hasselblad point and shoot. Good enough for print work and cheap enough to replace when it get's smashed. I did a two week off road motorcycle trip in Canada and the camera was dropped, mounted to the motorcycle, used in pouring rain and whipping dust storms - things I'd never do with the Hasselblad. It didn't miss a beat.

The major complaint I have despite all the great values :1) The focusing is just bad/ if you have tried 7d, you will see a huge difference2) I wish the ISO performance will be improved in the next model3) auto focusing in video is non-existent4) not very weather sealingThen I pretty much agree with all the good things about this camera!!!!

I finally gave up on film, reluctantly, like the old guy that I am, surrendering my Nikon after playing with my brother's Canon 5D. The 5D Mk II is an amazing camera, and if there were ever a question about digital having finally surpassed film, the answer is in. The images are crisp and gorgeous, and the camera has all the flexibility anyone could every hope for, and then some. The controls quickly become familiar and convenient, and the low-light sensitivity is astounding.That having been said, there are some notes I would make. It is built like a tank, and when matched with an "L"-series lens like the 24-70mm or 70-200mm is significant in its mass. In addition, the video images, though beautiful, must be further processed before they can be used in many video-editing programs (I use Vegas Pro 8.1), and I ended up having to purchase CineForm's NeoScene at about $100 to make them usable. It almost seemed as though Canon's video people weren't consulted fully on the video part of the camera. Again, however, great images are obtained once properly dealt with.I am sure that in the near future, an even more amazing camera will be sold; for me, this thing is perfect, even though I had to trade with my wife big time to purchase it.

I have owned the Canon 5D Mark II for over two months now and it is an amazing camera body. The HD video is fantastic.Pros:Amazing low light capabilities.Simple and intuitive menu system.Comfortable ergonomic design.Light weight.Film quality 1080P HD video.Breathtaking quality resolution.Cons:Uber expensive.Subpar autofocusing.Full frame sensor will always have numberous 'hot' pixels.Hot pixels show up in HD video and are impossible to remove without expensive post processing software.Need expensive L series lenses to really capture great images.Huge RAW files take up tons of hard drive space and require a bleeding edge workstation to edit in an efficient manner.Uber expensive.

I used to own Nikon FM10 35mm film SLR, I enjoyed shooting long exposure shots at night in city areas, when I switched to DSLR, the first one was Canon EOS Rebel XT, I tried the same night long exposure and the photos always have lot of grainy red dots, no matter how much the ISO is low and different size aperture.Then I bought Canon 40D, and I got the same problem, I even tried Nikon D90, the red dots were reduced, but still very noticeable. The exposure time was always less than 30 seconds, but the shooting was always in the city night, were there are always light pollution.Finally I got the 5D Mark II, and I did few testing and the red dots were very minimal, my friend gave me a tip, to disable the long exposure comp in the camera, which is the opposite of what someone should do, but that did the trick, the shots looked much better and cleaner. This is truly an amazing sensor, that can match the 35mm film quality.

I was scared to spend the money but when i received the camera i was pretty sure i had made the right decision. The menu system is very similar to the 50D so i was able to start making custom settings instantly. The 'bulb' setting is a welcome feature compared to the 50 and as is the 3 custom settings instead of 2. Image quality is awesome along with the full frame sensor to bring out the best of my L series lenses. Take the time to sign on to the canon registration since you get extra perks as a 5D owner.

If you are considering buying this camera, you need only to ask one question. Can i afford it? If the answer is yes then buy it. In my youth i often wondered why anyone would pay so much for a camera, i now know. Thank you canon for the education and an awesome camera.

I have used and own Nikon and Canon DSLR cameras for the last 5 years, from Nikon D40, Nikon D70, Canon 40D, Canon 50D and finally bought myself a full frame camera from Canon 5D Mark II. I can't be happier.... I love how I could do micro adjustments on my lenses, and love it that it captures the HD videos. It has been my professional work camera for the last 6 months and I like the results. It really stands up with the 24-105 lens and 80 f1.5 for portrait. I have the 70-200 F4 L IS with it, but I like it better with 24-105 and 85 1.8This camera has been a blessing. I just wished Canon has the on/off switches near the click button... just like Nikon. Other than that, I love this camera!Update: recently I purchased the 85 L 1.2 The combination of 5D Mark II with this lens is AMAZING! That's all I could say.

I'm doing a large scale documentation project photographing objects on a copy stand. Was pretty sure I was going to use Nikon bodies as thats what I'm familiar with. I tested several bodies and it came down to a 5d MkII or a D3. I'vee never been a pixel peeper but it was clear that that the added resolution with the 5D made a big difference and it was too ignore. Also it comes with the software you need to tether the camera which is nice. My biggest complaint is the ergonomics, big and clunky. Luckily I don't have to handle too much, because I definitely think Nikons are better in this regard. Also Canon's RAW format is less proprietary than Nikon's which does make a big difference to me.

I just received my 5D Mk2 less than two weeks ago. I have ran it through probably 2000 actuations and just today noticed a very obvious dead pixel. I have not exposed it to any harsh conditions, although I was hoping to be able to. I am sending it back for an exchange but I am very disappointed. I will re-review when I receive the replacement. I've been putting this off and finally jumped to get this camera and just don't know how to feel. I feel at bit cheated at this point, but we'll see.

The Canon 5D Mark II is absolutely amazing! It is worth every penny and I am very pleased. I purchased this camera primarily for the Hi-Def video feature. I do professional video work and I can't say anything negative about this camera. This camera shoots video strait to an uncompressed Quicktime .mov file. It is not AVCHD, there is no conversion needed. These video files can be placed directly on to a Final Cut timeline without any conversion or rendering. (This saves soooo much time. i.e. no log and capture and no log and transfer and no conversion in any way!!) Picture quality is amazing. I only wish I could merge the features of the Canon XH-A1 video camera with the video quality and file format of the 5D!!!! I have never really been interested in still pictures . . . until now. I took a photo of some friends from 20 feet away, when viewed in photoshop with the zoom feature set to "actual pixels" the detail was as if I had used a macro lens from 2 feet away (This is due to the 21 mega pixels). Everyone who sees the stills is amazed and I have already made money as a professional photographer!! (That's a first!)Ok . . . the only thing about this camera I would change is I would give it XLR inputs and a manual gain control feature and a meter to visually monitor audio levels. I imagine that if Canon did this they would lose business because no one would need to buy a pro video camera, they could just buy this! Otherwise, the audio pick up is decent . . . it's good enough to sync with the audio from other cameras, and it worked just fine with a shotgun mic and a wireless lapel mic.

The DIGIC 4 processor blows pretty much every other camera out of the water. It displays ISO 3200 with the amount of noise of a ISO 800 shot on the older DIGIC 2 & 3 models (ISO 1600 looks like ISO 640). The detail you get out of a 21.1 MP image is unbelievable... My only warning is to get a big memory card. If you are shooting in RAW, you're looking at 25-30MB per picture (10MB in JPEG). I get about 430 shots out of a 12.0GB card in RAW. Also, the RAW files can't read in many RAW reading programs, so you'll need Adobe DNG Converter (free at Adobe's site) or Adobe CS4.Combine this camera with a low f-stop lens and you're in for a real treat.

I've had this camera since December and it is better than I thought it will be. I read the reviews before I bought in which people complained about the focus. It is true that you need to be much more careful about focus with this camera (I came from a 20D.) It's not that there's anything wrong with the camera. To the contrary, it's that the detail is so good that your focus mistakes show up more. Use good lenses, use good technique and the results you get will amaze you.

I became adicted to photography with my 40D and after a year or so I started to see it's limitations. So I made the leap and bought the 5Dm2 and have been in love ever since. There are many technical reviews here and I recommend reading them all. This camera is not for everyone.

Who this is for (in my humble opinion):
- Those that primarily shoot in low light situations.
- the benefits from full frame and the 5D's amazing ISO
capabilities are amazing. I have pics at 3200 ISO with no noise.
- Portrait photographers.
- The picture quality is unbeatable (unless you tack on an
additional couple grand or more for the 1D)
- The 21.2 Mp gives you so much room to play with

Those who this may not be the best option:
- Sports photographers!
- I still use my 40D for those senarios where I want a lot
of fps. and reach. While the picture will always be better
with the 5Dm2, 3.9fps is very slow in my opinion. Just
something to consider.
- The full frame vs crop factor is interesting and you will
see it first hand when you put your lenses on this baby.
My 70-200 just became a walk around lense and has forced
me to beg my wife to buy the 100-400 and a 2x extender. My
17-40 just became an amazing wide angle.

Maybe it's just me but it seems that all of my lenses are so much sharper than before.

So, that is my humble opinion. This camera is all that it's cracked up to be and I haven't even talked about the video capabilities. Definitely worth the money.

I like this camera. It really makes me look bad, as I used to be very trigger happy, and with this one, well, let's say that your errors get augmented. But, when, once in a while, I take a good picture, the results are superb!. I like it, because it challanged me to be better, to think better about the composition, and about the light, about the subject. It's my favorite camera now.

This is a great camera. The buttons can be a bit confusing, but I'm just getting use to them. The camera feels good in my hands - solid, substantial. The LCD on the back of the camera is large, bright, and clear. The various menus make life easier. I highly recommend this product. I've been using a Canon T90 film SLR since 1986 and if the 5D Mark II performs half as well I'll be delighted.

I've had it for a couple of weeks now and I love it. It shoots in super low light! It does everything it claims to do. The picture is really what makes it worth it. It simply looks amazing. It has so much depth it almost looks 3D! No problems at all. No complaints. I highly recommend it!

Great sensor & image quality. However, the camera lacks many features one would expect from a $2700 camera:* Auto-focus points are poorly placed--they are a bit too close to the center (focus and recompose using center point doesn't work well due to shallow depth of field).* Outer auto-focus points hunt quite a bit. The camera feels non-responsive when using outer AF points (I'm coming from 40D, which has cross-type sensors for all AF points).* The CF card door creaks & is flimsy---this affects the grip.* The camera is quite heavy. Weight becomes a problem especially with heavier lenses (24-70L and 85 f/1.2L), where you get blurry shots more frequently (again, compared to xxD series cameras).* Lack of pop-up flash is bothering (although I have an external unit); If Nikon can do it, why can't Canon?* Lack of face-detection auto-focus during video recording. Expect to get a lot of out of focus videos.

I own the 5D, and decided to upgrade for the added megapixels and quality. The 5D is awesome...the 5D II is AMAZING!!!! I am sure this review is not going to make someone buy this camera...you have probably done tons of research about all the details. If you are wondering whether all you read is accurate and the camera is worth the money - YES! I feel this is the best bang for your buck in a compact, full-frame, semi-pro level camera. I use the camera mainly for landscape photography...the images captured are stunning. I recently enlarged a print to 20x30 and could not believe the quality and detail. This is not just an increase in megapixels, but rather an increase in QUALITY megapixels. The camera is not extremely large and expensive like the "Pro" level series. The camera's size makes it perfect for traveling and hiking into remote locations. I have not used the HD video yet, but that is not the intended use of the camera. The new batteries seem to last almost twice as long as those in my 5D.One note...either buy extra memory cards or a back-up drive to dump photos onto...the files are huge in RAW which is what I shoot. If you plan on any HDR or panoramas or a week in the field, a couple of 8gb cards will be full quicker than you expect. The file size will be more than welcome once you enlarge or crop a photo - like I stated earlier...stunning.

I am happy with the 5D mark 11. But I have on going issues. The screen decides to shut off by it's self when reviewing photos. It has frozen and then shuts off.This is when I am using the camera. I hate the idea of a video in the camera. Canon should have focused on the camera and not at all on video. I have all Canon due to investing in lens. Unsure if Nikon is better. My partner uses Nikon D3. He loves it. And craps on mine all the time. But over all Canon should have did more testing and spent more time and money on this Camera. And forget a video. Over all I would say it's a B- camera. I hate to say I like and trust my 50D more. I took the 50D to Argentina. It had no issues at over 10,000 shots and nearly a month from cold to jungles. But of course the 50D has major disadvantages over the 5D. Maybe step up to 1D.................that's a big jump.