Отзывы о Проектор Benq TH585P (DLP 3500Lm)

 I really dont know what users are complaining about with this monitor, unless they maybe got a bad one, the viewing angles are brilliant, as BenQ state, 178o from all sides is about right, but who doesnt really sit directly in front of their monitor anyway, it needed very very little configuration out of the box, my GPU (Radeon7) picked it up straight away as a 4k monitor, and auto enabled freesync, the freesync range is 40-60hz but can be changed using CRU software to a wider range, very rich colours, I went through 3 x 3440x1440 ultrawide monitors all giving me blurry and pixelated text in windows before I went for this one, I just downloaded the driver and colour profile from the BenQ website and away I went.

Just as a word of warning, one thing I did pickup as a bit strange out of the box was.......I am using my own, very high quality DP cable to connect my PC to the monitor, for some reason the monitor set itself up as 59hz, however, the AMD driver wouldnt allow me to run 10bit colour with 4:4:4 settings, only 8 bit, I had to dial down to 4:2:2 settings to run 10bit, thats when I discovered it was running at 59hz, I changed it to 60hz with windows advanced monitor settings and went back to the AMD driver settings and set it straight to 10bit colour with 4:4:4 settings, all is good in the world now.

The video above is running the 4k UHD demo video on youtube Costa Rica, the camera on my S10 doesnt do this monitor or this video the justice it deserves, Absolutely stunning !!!

You wont be disappointed, my next upgrade will be for a 5k2k ultrawide next, just waiting on BenQ to release one, which is the same as 4k, just in ultrawide version.

First off, you can not change any of the monitor settings in HDR mode which bugged me from the beginning BUT when playing games on PC and PS4 the monitor does perform quite well.

The picture quality is pretty decent and seems to be fairly low input lag for gaming. I don't play competitive FPS gaming where every millisecond and high refresh rates count but the performance is impressive in all fast paced action games and movies. (Go get a 144hz monitor for that :P) .

Back light bleed is minimal even for a fairly cheap 32inch 4K monitor.

When I first got the monitor I was very happy with it.

*Unfortunately*

Terrible light banding issues across the screen (hard to take a photo of but you know it when you see it).
The 1st monitor developed a fault within a few months, black patches creeping across from either side of the screen.
Amazon kindly had a replacement organised within literally 2 minutes of explaining the issue to them.

The second monitor (replacement) arrived and already I could see issues with it. Terrible back light bleed on the bottom left corner which wasn't present on the original monitor. The original monitor had little back light bleed and to be honest I was fairly impressed by it for a monitor in this price range.

There is also a dead pixel in the top right corner a dead black pixel, not a dead sub-pixel but a dead pixel, in fact it looks like it could be 2 or 3.
These two things are incredibly distracting for me, I honestly find the monitor unusable, I'm incredibly unhappy with it, whereas I was extremely happy with the original monitor until it started having issues.

The quality control at BENQ strikes me as extremely poor. I would strongly reconsider before ever buying one of their products again.
I have only every been told good things about BENQ monitors from friends and family and their reputation and reviews seem mostly positive.

Other than that, its actually a pretty decent monitor for gaming/movies in 4K and with the bonus of HDR. Admittedly the HDR isn't going to be amazing and I wouldn't expect it at this price range but honestly it's quite nice.

It's just a shame that everything I've experienced with this monitor has been so poor.

I will again contact amazon about a replacement but honestly I'd prefer to just take my money elsewhere.

*I will try to grab photos when I can. It's hard to get the lighting right on my phone to show a true representation of what is happening*

I compared this screen side-by-side with the BenQ PD3200U.

This is an excellent monitor, however, its crucial failing is viewing angle, due to it being a TN panel. Because the monitor is so large, your viewing angle into the centre of the screen is quite different from your viewing angle to the edge of the screen. So, no matter where you sit, the colours to one or more edges look wrong – usually, too bright or faded.

For entertainment, games and films will look great – in particular in the monitor's 10bit HDR mode (with HDR content). It can also simulate HDR, which will make games and films pop even more than they normally would (although this effect can seem over the top). Personally I don't find this useful, as it's annoying to have to keep turning HDR mode on and off. Windows doesn't handle it all that well, and you may find yourself doing other things – writing essays, watching YouTube, reading email, etc. – also in an unnaturally saturated HDR mode.

The screen could well be used for design work, but not work where fine colour control is important. The screen is capable of sRGB mode with 100% coverage, but it is not factory calibrated and its accuracy can't be guaranteed. Side-by-side with the calibrated PD3200U, colours seemed to be shifted very slightly towards green. It is also visibly blotchy; that is, a solid block of colour does not look totally uniform.

The monitor does not come with any I/O, which shouldn't be a dealbreaker but feels like a convenience I'd miss. The stand is sturdy but does not allow much adjustment at all. However, mounting it on a separate VESA mount was easy and effective. It is not a heavy monitor, so most arms will carry it without any adjustment.

Overall, this monitor offers a 4K, whopping 32 inch panel at a really fantastic price. And it looks great. But if you're thinking of doing any design work, paying more for an IPS panel is worth it.

BenQ EW3270U. Not bad picture quality but having come from top of the line dell IPS monitor the picture looks a bit washed out and suffers from backlight bleed around the edges. Viewing angles not too bad for a VA panel though. Mine had a small white what looks like a paint chip on the bezel surround but I used a marker to dull it out and also the front grey part of my stand has a slight ding in it also so quality control could be better. As this monitor is mainly used for viewing online its fulfilling this purpose but would not recommend for high end photography or colour productive work. I can ignore the flaws also as if anyone noticed it was on pre order with Amazon for £299 so bagged a bargain really.

This monitor is my first 4K monitor/screen. I have seen plenty of 4K screens before though.
I have an Xbox One S and a gaming laptop. My Xbox One S gs this monitor all the green ticks for 4K besides Dolby Vision, watching 4K content on it whether it be Netflix or Youtube, the quality is amazing. The emulated HDR makes colours pop, light and dark scenes better to watch.

My gaming laptop doesn't quite have the power to output games at 4K 60fps but seeing the games at 4K quality anyway is very nice to see, it can however play games at 1440p (2K) at 60 fps and they look fantastic.

The only issue I have with my monitor in particular is the light bleed from the backlight. It is particularly bad on the left hand side near the bottom, when viewing a dark image or scene it is very noticeable and takes away from the quality of the video. When watching a bright scene there are no issues at all.

Would I recommend this monitor. Yes.

For a 4K HDR monitor for £300 this is I think a great starter monitor if your just getting into 4K for the first time.

Great screen for a budget set up.

I am currently using it and I could not be happier. There are a few things such as the HDRi which does not work that well and I barely use it (Only in The Division 2). The refresh rate is good and there is no ghosting. I use it for mainly Rainbow Six Siege, and other games such as Assassin's Creed. One thing to take into account it is that there is some black light bleeding at the corner. Have I notice? Yes. Does it bother me? Not at all.

The build of the monitor is great, solid. This is one of the best good looking monitors I have seen, even more impressive coming from BenQ.

For this price it the best monitor out there you can find. If you are looking for something cheap and stable get this.

With it's 4K resolution and 60hz refresh rate, this monitor is clearly targeting those who play console games and movies on their PC.

At 4K, you aren't going to be running the next Assassins Creed at much more than 60fps even on the most exotic and expensive gaming PC's. Heck you'd struggle to do the last one at much more than 60fps without turning down details. Same with Red Dead Redemption 2.

If you are an e-sports FPS type player, you clearly want a lower resolution and and higher refresh. Furthermore, this screen is simply too large for competitive FPS because the field of view is too great. You would miss things happening at the sides of the screen as you physically need to turn your head to see the corners when sat a mouse/keyboard distance from it.

So this is more for loading up Steam, leaning back in your chair, grabbing your joypad and playing console style. It's fine for MMO's with a mouse and keyboard though. WoW looks absolutely fantastic.

The VA panel delivers superior contrast and more vibrant colours that are far more suited to entertainment than IPS or TN panels. It actually displays real deep blacks where as IPS/TN can only do a grey.

For photo editing it is absolutely fine. I do a lot of work with photos that are mostly used by people on social media and there is no issue here. For someone producing professionally for a magazine or something where calibration of the utmost importance then maybe they'd prefer an IPS.

To be honest I didn't even feel the need to calibrate mine to make it closer to accurate. It was pretty good out the box and I found that turning on the eye care feature and the light sensor was all it took for a lovely and comfortable image.

Most people wouldn't be happy with how it looks if they used the widely available calibrated settings that you can find online as it tends to make it look more subdued and it won't "pop" as much. So don't assume that a fully calibrated monitor is what you really want, just because a group of people who only represent 0.01% of PC users talk it up.

If you aren't turning on the eye care features then you will definitely want to lower the brightness from the factory setting though or it will burn out your eyes.

My PC did detect it as a monitor and not a TV so I didn't have to manually select the full dynamic range rather than limited. I did however have to select 10bit colour from the NVIDIA panel.

HDR works on HDR content and made Red Dead Redemption 2 look better. It is only edge lit rather than using an array of lights but then it is £400 and not £1000 so you can't expect top spec HDR at this price.

No issues with motion blur in games, text looks great and the viewing angles are fine albeit not as good as IPS.

Surprisingly on my old 1080ti it appears to detect and support the freesync function of this monitor! That's a bonus because G-Sync screens have a scandalous price premium. Latency is also excellent for gaming. Feels the same as my Acer Predator pro gaming monitor in that respect.

One bizarre thing I noticed which is actually good.......

It is incredibly light! It feels far lighter than my 27" Predator. Yet it isn't as if the stand is flimsy or anything. That means if you don't have the toughest desk, it won't cause it to bow as much as you might think.

Overall I will give it a 5/5. On the grounds that you won't get better for less money. Sure it doesn't do HDR like a £1000 TV and sure it isn't as accurate as an £800 professional content creation screen. But at £400 it is accurate enough, does HDR well enough and even in SDR mode, it absolutely blows the sock off any TN or IPS panel for gaming/contrast.

From a content consumption perspective, the VA panel is 1000% better than TN and IPS, where as for content creation IPS has an advantage of say 5%. So do the math...

I've been a fan of BenQ monitors for over a decade now and decided it was time for an upgrade from a Full-HD EW2750ZL as I now have the PC horsepower to pull 4K at 60FPS or above in many games.

The games where I can't manage this still look great rendered at 2K or 3K then GPU upscaled to 4K with Radeon Image Sharpening on an AMD RX Vega 56. This monitor's FreeSync feature works perfectly for ironing out the occasional dip below 60FPS (as low as 40FPS) without any stutters.

Input lag is stated in many independent reviews as being around 10 milliseconds. I have no way of confirming this but am inclined to believe it as there's no apparent lag even in fast-paced games. This equates to well under one frame at 60Hz, so I can't imagine anyone having a problem with it.

The panel's 3000:1 static contrast ratio and DCI-P3 colour gamut leads to much deeper blacks than any TN or IPS panel as well as colours that pop nicely. If it pops too much for anyone's liking, they can always rein it in by either selecting the monitor's sRGB picture mode or dialling back the saturation.

There is a slight glow in the lower left-hand corner on mine, but it's standard practice for me to install sufficiently bright bias lighting behind a monitor to give the impression that blacks are actually black. Under these conditions, it's barely perceptible. I can certainly happily live with it.

Movies look fantastic! My movie archive is always played back via Media Player Classic - Black Edition with the aid of madVR precision rendering and this monitor blows my similarly priced Toshiba TV away in terms of overall clarity and perceived image depth, especially with the room lights out.

I've very little to add really except to say that if you're familiar with the pros and cons of a VA panel (actually MVA in this instance) then this monitor is unlikely to give you any unpleasant surprises. There are better monitors around dedicated to specific tasks for a similar price, but this is an excellent all-rounder.

It's taken quite a bit to set this up.
Easier on the desktop but I share it with a laptop too and that was a major pain.
Its still not quite right on the laptop.
The image is very good in general and I'm enjoying it mostly.
As I've read in other reviews the screen quality isn't all it should be. I already have a small line at the top (almost looks like a hair got under the screen. Most of the time I don't see it but with a white background like now I really do - and once you've seen it, your eyes just wander back to it - ruins the experience really. I may have to return it (like so many other people) - shame really.

I wanted a good 4k monitor that I could use with my ps4 but one that was not ridiculously expensive. The BenQ EW278OU was frequently recommended on tech websites as one of the best 4k monitors you could buy on a budget.

I am so glad that I bought it. My PS4 had no problems connecting to it. Assassin's Creed Odyssey played beautifully on it. The image is so crisp and clear. It has two HDMI ports so I can connect my laptop for work and my ps4 at the same time. I will be using this monitor with the ps5 when it comes out.

Now bear in mind that for £400 some compromises had to be made. This is where a lot of the negative reviews are coming from. People who are leaving negative reviews are ignorant people expecting top MSI or Asus gaming monitor features.

BenQ has not marketed itself as a gaming monitor. If you want all the features of a gaming monitor then you are going to need to stop being a cheapskate and fork up some extra 500 quid for those features.

If you want a cheap 4k monitor that you can use for gaming and work then this monitor does exactly that.

Good points...

- Picture quality is great both for work and movies (though I'm no expert). HD does make a noticeable difference for movies.
- The remote control is convenient for switching between modes, especially HDR. It's much easier than grubbing around behind the screen for a small switch.
- On screen menus are easy to navigate (especially with the remote).

Neither good nor bad...

- With my Mac I had to turn on scaling as the native resolution is far too small to see menus.
- I haven't tried it with a games console so can't comment here.
- The speakers are better than average but not a patch on external speakers or a sound bar and have limited volume. They may be adequate if you are short on space and only need them for light viewing and office work. However, I wouldn't expect much from built in speakers so this isn't a negative.

Less good...

- Parts of the housings (like the speaker grilles) are coloured brown. I would have preferred a neutral colour but you get used to it.
- The included USB-C cable doesn't work with my 2018 Mac Mini. Works fine if you use an Apple-branded Thunderbolt cable.
- There's no useful height adjustment. If you want this, buy a VESA mount but be aware the monitor is pretty heavy so make sure the one you buy is specced for the weight. However, you may only need on if you need extra space to fit something under the monitor - I needed to accommodate a sound bar which wouldn't fit with the default stand (see picture).

I bought this as a second screen for my 27" iMac and it turned out to be an ideal choice. Physical height is similar although the picture area is much larger, especially at 4k resolution. The iMac detected the screen immediately on either HDMI or Displayport inputs and the Mac is almost seamless moving between the 2 screens. Colours are great although I'm not a fan of HDR, far too rich and saturated for me but in standard mode it matches closely the iMac Retina screen which I have set to 3200x1800. Terrific value at under £400

The build and finish of this monitor is great and definitely looks good, the screen quality is 1080p so there are better monitors out there if you want to spend more money, I have noticed when using this paired to my MacBook the picture quality can look a little fuzzy around the edges of icons, also the HDRi and low blue light does work well, the 27” has tiny bezels as you will notice in the pictures, the viewing angel is also really good due to the IPS panel.
Overall would definitely purchase again, and I’m really happy with it so far.

Well over the monitor is good for video editing and general office work. However I was after something I could use in the home office with my MacBook Pro and my xbox. the MacBook Pro part is flawless and provides crisp and sharp picture with a variety of colours to suit your needs. The xbox does work with HDR but is in no way a substitute for HDR10+ that you get on a TV, ,then again the price reflects that.

The speakers are not great at all so again if you are after gaming sound get a mini sound bar and plug in to the xbox.

In summary if you are after a monitor for work and the odd xbox game then this is good, not great but good. if you are more of an xbox screen with some work then no, get a 32/42 inch HDR 4k TV as the console will look much much better.

I bought this to replace and old Asus 24 inch ips panel, straight away i could see how much brighter and more vibrant this was. I mainly use this for the PS4 and Mac mini and i am very happy with the quality. The panel is very responsive for games and the HDR is somewhat decent but as always its game specific, i had good results in Modern Warfare as you can adjust white/black point gamma ect.. i now find it easier to see others in dark maps.

I also want to mention that the 1080p supersampling on PS4 is crisp and one of the reasons why i decided against a 4k panel as its a minefield finding one that suited all my needs (Photoshop editing) without upscaling text blur ect..

I paid £170 for this and i very happy with it on my desktop vesa mount. I have included some pictures of the PS4 with HDR on but i feel its better to see in person. i hope this helps.

I'm really happy with this monitor having had it a few months.

Though around £700 is a lot you'll struggle to get a 32 inch display with 4K, HDR, good brightness for HDR (400+ nits), no PWM, eye care, Freesync and Gsync compatibility, and ideally IPS panel, USB-C video and power, good speakers, and a remote. I looked around a lot and the monitors were either a lot more or missed some features but weren't that much cheaper.

32 inch 4K has been really good for working with Unreal Engine and that was one of my main drivers. I also wanted to use it as a TV with a Humax box and this has also been great - the REC.709 setting looks lovely and the remote helps, (and I've been able to add the monitor to my Harmony One remote as well). The speakers are good and provide a fair bit of bass - I didn't find them disappointing like I have with some flatscreens. I can also with a laptop just use the usb-c cable for power and picture and it works great at 4K.
4K HDR gaming has also been great - no stuttering or tearing using the gsync with an Nvidia RTX 2070 super. The pictures look fantastic on games like Shadow of the tombraider, metro exodus - the pictures, especially for the former, often look real. I'm not a competitive gamer but I debated a bit about getting a higher refresh rate monitor - to say this this feels totally smooth with no issues for gameplay at 60Hz eve on racing games like forza horizon 4.
4K HDR from Netflix (note the windows app seems poor - and I use the browser which seems better) and discs has also been great though it has needed a bit of trial and error with settings.
HDR 400 is the one that immediately appeals as the contrast can be altered and this enables you to set the HDR intensity to suit your own equipment and content. This was great but then I started to notice on Netflix HDR content and to a lesser extent in Metro Exodus the whole brightness of the screen would change quite frequently for some programmes. Whether this is Windows or the monitor not sure - though I'm not sure it happened with the Xbox One X but don't have that connected to the monitor right now. I think it's reading the HDR singal and implementing global dimming.
However, the HDRi modes don't do this and I've been able to get a really good picture using these modes. I've seen reports HDRi varies the brightness a lot but I haven't found that to be the case at all. The thing is initially compared to HDR400 the whole picture looks dimmer and the HDR effect isn't so strong. It's like you've put sunglasses on. The contrast can't be changed for the HDRi modes. What I did is set the RTX 2070 super to use nvidia settings rather than windows settings (which seems to vastly improve the picture anyway) and then and then alter the brightness and contrast there. I've then been able to get great pictures across the board.
I realise that in comparison to and HDR600 or 1000 TV this might not be so good but it's really good in comparison to non HDR video. If the screen shows the sun it makes you squint, torches look very bright, light flashes off metal etc - it all looks more realistic. What HDRi also does is manage the darker scenes better - it seems to keep better contrast and make them less washed out. Game HDRi seems to lift the brightness in the darker scenes a bit more which can be better in some circumstances but can make it look too flat and I generally prefer cinema HDRi. I'm pretty picky about picture quality and have a very good projector for films and I am very happy with the Benq. I would say check the HDRi super resolution and sharpness settings as I found the sharpness was turned right up to 10 and it made things look grainy or slightly odd / unrealistic at times until I turned it down a bit.

I debated a lot on VA or IPS and ultimately it seems they both have pros and cons. VA has better contrast but less realistic colours and brightness and colour temperature can vary across the screen, especially if you're at an angle or close to the screen. IPS has accurate colours, better viewing angles, but in darker scenes can be more prone to IPS bloom - screen being brighter in one or more corners. I took the view I'd rather have the hit of IPS bloom - which is minimal on this even with HDR on and in the dark with a black screen or dark image - for darker material than issues that potentially occur all the time to varying extents but it's a personal choice.

The only downside has been some quality issues. The first monitor had terrible bleed as well as a lot of brightness variations across the screen. The main bleed was a spot to right of middle and it looked like someone was always holding a little torch at the top of the screen. This was returned (got a replacement delivery next day after raising the issue, before sending off the faulty one - really impressed) and a new one was much better in terms of overall consistency of brightness across dark scenes, though had a similar bleed issue at the bottom to the right. Less severe but I returned this as well, also prompted by a price reduction.

This latest monitor that I've kept had minimal bloom and no bleed. I have noticed an issue whereby the honeycomb material stuck across the bottom bezel is lifting up slightly in a couple of places and I periodically need to push it down. not ideal but given the screen itself is good I'm living with this.

I went for 5 stars but would have probably done 4.5 if possible to account for the returns and the bezel but I am very pleased with the performance and picture quality of this monitor and it looks very nice - it doesn't shout out computer monitor or look like an office item; it feels more like a nice TV.

Hope this helps - I deliberated a long time about what monitor to get and whether this one would be OK so hopefully this give some good insight to anyone in a similar position.

Owning a Xbox One X, getting a decent 4K UHD screen that has a low input lag (time lag between console image transmission to actual screen display) is essential. Especially if one plays any kind of game with very fast moving images, that also requires fast reactions. One need only look at your 4K UHD TV options to know that the best ones cost a fortune compared to the cost of a Xbox One X (or PS4 Pro). Moreoever, the budget TVs are not without their significant caveats. Namely, significant input lag and low native frame rates of 50Hz.
This is where this adequately sized and reasonably priced BenQ monitor comes in.
Being a 32 inch, 4K UHD monitor, which is natively 60Hz, with an excellent input lag of just 1ms, this has performed excellently for gaming, and for 4K movies alike. It produces crisp and clear images at 4K resolution, and it's HDR function showcases a wider variety of contrast.
However, it's HDR function has limited options to adjust while in HDR mode; which is arguably not that significant if you received a model with the latest firmware. There are essentially a high brightness and low brightness setting for this, and generally speaking, I would recommend the low brightness setting, as the high brightness setting tends to display reds/orange colours a bit too brightly.
The other limitation are its internal speakers, which one should never use; the speakers are terrible. This is easily mitigated by picking up a set of external speakers, such as simple £20 Logitech speakers that will phenomenally improve your sound experience, or better yet, a soundbar with a remote control to allow you to change the volume as necessary from your own seat. One could also connect this to a surround sound system, but a bigger and better TV would be suggested for that.
Having connected this monitor to my Xbox One X, and using the console as my all in one media device (as it was originally designed to be), I can say that this is easily the best value for money 4K UHD screen that functions not only as a 4K TV for me, but as an excellent monitor for gaming and 4K movies.
I would absolutely recommend this as the best value budget choice, for anyone with a 4K gaming console, needing a reasonably priced screen to fully utilise the capabilities of their console, without burning a hole in your wallet.

Initially, I was happy with the EW3270U. I could tolerate the variance of backlighting seeing as it's a VA panel.

However, after around 7-8 months, I have noticed two dark thick vertical lines on the left side of the screen. These were not evident previously. I can only see them when there's a dark or grey background but, now I know they're there, I'm always conscious and checking to see if they're getting worse.

Not what I expect for a £346 screen. 8 months in and it looks like it's already on the way out.

I don't know what my next step is - contact Amazon or Benq?

edit//
Dealt with two people through Amazon customer service on 31st December 2019.

Half an hour later after being asked to take a photo of the issue, email it them, check my cabling, turn my monitor on and off, reset my colours etc etc, the advice was for me to........contact Benq.

Thanks for nothing Amazon. Whatever happened to your customer service? I don't appreciate being patronised for 25-30 minutes only to then be told at the end of it to go directly to the manufacturer.

edit 2//
Finally went through an RMA with Benq. Sadly, they let me know just before dispatch that the replacement screen would be a "fully functional refurbished unit". Not acceptable.

I'm now left with no option but to keep the original monitor and tolerate the dark vertical tramlines running down the left of the screen.

Never again will I buy a Benq product. Once bitten, twice shy.

The monitor itself has been fit-and-forget for me with no regular tweaking required and flawless switching between sources and wake/sleep with the laptop. Colour is good and the brightness goes up high and down low.
The stand is basic with a small tilt adjustment and no height or swivel and definitely no rotation options. You can fit a monitor arm though to provide all that adjustment if you like (or already have one). I am not sure about the HDR function yet but you have it and Bi+ at the touch of a button.
The built-in speakers are . . . well, they work. I have an ARCam amp and Q-acoustics speakers for my audio output but there is also a headphone socket for private listening.

Good screen and picture quality - using with a MacBook Pro.
Sound quality is Ok for video calls but a bit tinny for watching media.
Had some issues with the USB-C connection kept cutting out, but HDMI is working fine. I paid more for USB-C connection.

After a couple of weeks of use I now have horizontal black & white lines across the monitor, so now being sent back. Screen seems very flimsy.

My previous 21-inch screens always felt sufficient-to-large but instantly looked tiny with this between them (1st illustration). The amount of screen-space and pixel-count at first felt huge but, unfortunately, I got used to it very quickly. The side-screens now feel cramped whenever they're displaying anything more detailed than thumbnails or YouTube.

My greatest fear is that I really, really, want to buy another two of these now but can't afford it! It performs perfectly. Although purists might want a higher refresh-rate if they are mainly playing twitch shooters this has not affected my work, watching videos, the slower/builder games I usually play or ARMA/Tomb Raider/Hitman when I have tried those. (2nd illustration ROTTR)

The picture quality is gorgeous. Its also really light - I thought a 32" monitor was going to be really heavy; couldn't believe how light it was when I lifted it out of the box. Makes mounting it on a stand very easy.
The picture quality is superb, the resolution amazing - can put a number of windows all on one screen and work just on the one monitor - really useful for work.
Lightroom works well using just this monitor; no real need for a second one - its so big and such high res.
Love it basically.

There are people far more knowledgeable than me who have given technical feedback however; my requirements are quite simple - I work with CAD, or PDF, drawings and require a clean high definition monitor and this does the job very well however; there is one thing I did not count on - the graphics card I was using Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX580 would not go above 30Hz when this monitor was in 3840 x 2160 resolution so I've also had to update my graphics card to a GEFORCE RTX 2060 as a minimum
I do not use this monitor for PC gaming so am unable to comment and therefore no stars

Amazon reviews mix the various different benq monitors, which is useless as they are all quite different so I am specifically reviewing the ew277hdr.

Basically, it's a great monitor for the price.

Details wise, basically go read the various online review articles if you want a proper assessment.

But briefly: Contrast is fantastic. HDR is so-so, but I really don't mind because the high contrast looks great anyway. Speakers are fine for loud games/films but annoying in that they're just little too quiet for the quiet moments of films. Viewing angles great, response times seem reasonable to me.

Ultimately I returned this as I couldn’t get on with the backlight uniformity issues. Black levels excellent though so if you don’t use lots of white backgrounds this is a super monitor, with great eye care facilities. But I’m looking for a uniform panel, and this just wasn’t it.

really pleased with it, great for playing my xbox and occasionally used for work as a second screen to my laptop. The built in speakers are pretty good, I read Benq is a good brand for gaming monitors, as soon as i saw the metal base/stand piece i was impressed, its sturdy, i used the hdmi ports and sometimes plug headphones

perfect size for what i was looking for

i was very happy with the price, was expecting to spend more on a good monitor with speakers so this was spot on for me

not sure i have any strong negatives - one criticism is the point the power cable goes into the monitor it doesnt go all way (bit of silver is exposed) not had any problems though. maybe i should give it some force to get it in all the way but i dont want to damage anything and its really nbd

It's not full HDR like 720p is not fullHD, but it does work and the difference between this and standard tv is clear. Netflix and YouTube hdr content all work.
Assasins creed, red dead II and modern warfare also worked in hdr mode (so hdr gaming runs fine), and you can tell the difference. Gran tourismo was stunning, got to love those replays . Speakers peform better than expected for such low wattage, if I want loud I have amps/headphones.
My nephew tried it and now he wants one.

With all the working from home I decided I needed a second monitor - after a fair amount of research I settled on this as providing for all my needs. It was initially supposed to be my secondary monitor (primary being an ASUS ROG) but after sitting side by side for some time I have actually started preferring to use this as the colour is superb and the refresh rate at 60hz is fine (ROG has 144hz) and only in certain situations would you notice the difference. Also while not officially supported, I have found that that G-sync works fine with it as well. My biggest surprise was how good the sound was...so while working I have great audio (crisp and clear with a nice bass). Really happy with it. Only negative is the stand is not very flexible, prefer the ASUS one.

I bought two benq ew3270u, the first one because of the serious backlight bleed, especially the lower left corner, especially in the lower left corner. I returned the first one and waited until it in stock I bought the second one. Compared with the first one, the backlight in the lower left corner is not so obvious, because the backlight bleed is brighter of other area.However, due to the viewing angle of the VA panel, the fading of the edges will be more serious. Especially playing or watching a dark game or movie in a dark environment. I have a benq ew277, its backlight control is much better than this type.

The screen of this monitor is somewhat yellow, the maximum brightness is only 300cd/m2, HDR is not true HDR. After some games turn on HDR, black will turn red and white will turn blue.

But its price is competitive, after all, IPS panel, 32-inch monitor is expensive, and benq ew3270u's response speed is not slow, faster than many IPS panels. In bright picture, high contrast, high color gamut makes its picture not bad for game or movies. At ￡300 range, I think it is still the most valuable

I purchased this to use with my MacBook Pro and my Windows computer. It has a USB C connection.
The USB cable is very short and very flimsy. I disconnected my MacBook and the connector at the end of the cable fell to pieces.
I purchased a very expensive Belkin USB-C cable, it didnt work!! (it charges no picture) I borrowed a friends USB-C cable - this didnt work either - It will work using a Display port to a USB-Cable, but I use the Display port for my Windows computer. Seemingly it needs a USB-C cable that is special to the monitor that isn't bi-directional - (picture and charge)
I contacted BenQ on-line support and they couldnt give me the type of cable I needed to buy and after an hour of waiting for them to answer my chat. They sent me an email with an RMA. The support agent didnt supply thier name and was so slow it became very frustrating. They couldnt help me other than say they I can purchase a cable from them. Why can I not go out and buy one? Do they not know the product they sold me? They made it after all.
I am quite unhappy about this situation, and definitely would not recommend this monitor for a MacBook user.

If you want these for professional CAD or photo edit use and don't use the gaming gimmicks so far these have been very good. No dead pixels or sub pixels (class 0), good colour gambit, good viewing angles, uniform screen backlight, reasonable sound. Dual BenQ monitors running UHD from a Dell 9020 is a very nice combination.

For this price the picture is excellent, bar the viewing angles. The light sensor is also very valuable to me as I use it during the evenings.

Though I nearly returned as the viewing angles on this VA panel are terrible. This is a problem as it is a 32" so part of the screen is always at an angle. So the sides and especially top corners get faded. But I persisted and now don't notice it as much, especially not in the daytime.

Alternative monitors at this price (and time) do not have a light sensor, USB-C and VESA mount.

I wish it was curved though. As that would help with the viewing angles. I have HDR disabled as no use to me.

For the price, it’s gives a good quality picture, but what’s incredibly frustrating is how fast and loose manufacturers are still (in 2020) playing with the term HDR. This is not a 10-bit panel, but an 8-bit panel with software that fakes the HDR range and I really wish manufacturers would be more forthcoming with this critical difference.

No matter the manufacturers’ claims, the end result is an underwhelming version of HDR... you get some of the effect, certainly, but not the eye-popping difference a true 10-bit panel gives. It’s more like “SDR+“, and I really think that is the label they should be using.

This particular screen is also quite dark at 300 nits (not so much a problem for where I’m using it) and the white point in HDR mode is a bit on the yellow side.

In terms of resolution and response rate though, this monitor is excellent, which is why I haven’t scored it too harshly.

Love it. Looks great, colours are vivid and while it's not strictly a gaming monitor it does well enough for my needs (I play some fast paced games - Rocket League, Destiny 2 and the inbuilt AMA does a fine job of keeping up with the action) as well as being a joy to watch films on. Haven't used HDR so can't comment on that as a feature but overall I'm extremely happy with my purchase (so far).

The wife likes the style and function of the monitor.
It took a bit of fiddling about to setup the eye preferences(but it is the same for all users) for her, but she is happy with it as it sits far back to the wall now, vs further forward from her old monitor.
The only downside is that there is not up/down adjustment on it, but for the price it is great!

I bought the EW327OU 32” Monitor to use with my desk top PC which I use mostly for gaming. It is definitely a big screen, but if your buying for PC use you might want to consider going with the 28”, (I kinda wish I did now). Picture quality seems ok, but not as good as I was expecting.

Amazing monitor for the price considering the specs. Only downside is the HDR is pretty much a lie.
Photo mode is the only good mode to use without calibration but it does the job just fine and has fairly similar colour reproduction in comparison to my MacBook.

I would without a doubt recommend this monitor unless you have a considerably higher budget.

Very decent monitor for the price on offer. The HDR advertised is not perfect however. Some games alleged to support HDR do struggle to display on this monitor and if like mine you'll find yourself constantly in and out of the settings trying to get the right setting for different games and switching between. The style is very good and lightweight. However the frameless edge is a bit strange to get use to. Although the frame is not prominent around the edge the display does not go all the way to the edge of the screen and you are left with a black line. Good colours and quality.

The display has really accurate colors, even though not blingy as my phone (samsung s8+). Compared to colours, my phone wins, but compared to size and clarity, this display wins. This display is so accurate that you see too much noise in dark backgrounds, especially on netflix (daredevil s3). Movies are a treat on this thing, but bear in mind you will need good quality movies (blu rays) to make it shine. The gaming aspect is fine, I can see my enemies clearly in rainbow6siege, but I am capped at 60fps. The best part of this display is the eye care. This helped me loads during my long hours of studying, minmal eyestrain if any.

I just wanted this monitor for everyday use and it's been excellent. Easy to setup and the built-in speakers are a real bonus. I've really missed having a big screen during lockdown and it's been great using this to connect to my laptop. I use it with a docking station for my work laptop but just connect my personal laptop via HDMI and use a wireless keyboard and mouse. Would recommend to anyone wanting a laptop for everyday use.

If you're looking to buy a gaming monitor this is definitely not the one, it tries emulate HDR and it hurts your eyes, it does have v-sync but if you own a rtx graphic card then you will have problems once it does not work properly with it, only 60 mhz. Overall if you would like to buy it for gaming bear in mind you could find a better monitor for some extra pounds.

I have been using the screen for about 3 weeks now and so far I really like the screen. I don't game as much as used to, however, I play from time to time and I must admit gaming in 4K is a completely different league.
The screen is huge 32 inches compared to 24 inches (my previous screen) and it took me 2-3 days to used to and now my everyday work (mainly photoshop, Corel and office software) is absolutely a pleasure. But be aware of the dead pixels issue, the first screen I received came with three dead pixels so I sent back to Amazon, second, came perfectly so make sure to check yours, rather than that screen is great.
BTW HDR mode is only good when HDR content is receiving, HDR emulation mode is quite poor.

Brought this to replace my LG32Ud99w which was consistently faulty. This screen was half the price of that and only slightly lower screen quality. The HDR is good not amazing but you have to expect what you pay for. Overall a great monitor, only negatives are no usb ports and if you are coming from a £1000 grade screen the brightness is not on par but still very good. Build quality seems sound too.

This monitor is extremely dim. Compared to my new MacBook the colours are both washed out and dark. Doesn’t appear to be a way for me to significantly change the picture. If it’s bright In the room I struggle to be able to view it.

The speakers are terrible in my opinion. Quickly disabled because the sound from my MacBook is 10x better.

Really good monitor, HDR emulator can take some time getting use to as the colours do change, I’m guessing thats a good thing? But overall happy with it, only downside is when i start my computer the picture seems dull so i have to keep going into settings and change the brightness, personally not a problem but could see it annnoying others.

I don't understand the point of a monitor that has a USB-C port but only uses it for display output.

I would expect this to charge my laptop too, and ideally for the monitor to have a couple of USB ports (so that it acts as a USB hub), but this Ben Q monitor does not support power delivery (cannot charge laptop) and does not have any USB inputs.

I bought this to connect to my 2016 12" MacBook on my office desk. The picture quality is superb and the monitor looks great. The ONLY reason I didn't give 5 stars was because it doesn't supply enough power to my MacBook through the one cable while in use. This means that my MacBooks battery decreases when plugged in so I have to make sure it's juiced up before using the monitor for extended periods. Apart from that, it has been a fantastic addition to my desk. There's also no USB A ports for anyone who wants to use this as a dongle/adapter substitute.

Extra screen dimensions perfect for workflow and multitasking, resolution is very high and ideal for working on visually exacting tasks such as photo and video editing. I won't look back now having moved to this (huge but surprisingly adaptable) screen. The 4K resolution helps with all tasks and makes browsing and quickly moving from one task to another (regardless of the nature of the task) quick and simple - you'll never lose your train of thought flicking between endless tabs!