Оперативная память Silicon Power SP008GBLFU240BS2 — 110 отзывов, плюсы и минусы
110 отзывов пользователей о Silicon Power 8GB 2400MHz CL17 (SP008GBLFU240BS2)
Пользовались
Silicon Power 8GB 2400MHz CL17 (SP008GBLFU240?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
I did a few speed tests before and after. This drive is SATA 3 so the bottle neck is the interface itself. The SSD saturates most of the bandwidth ( a good thing)
Definitely worth the price. If you want blazing speed you get a m.2 drive instead of sata. But you work with what you have.
I decided to purchase the drive because some reviews gave the drive and software
good reviews. I've used SP products in the past and have had no problems.
This time was different!
The software downloads, and installs fine. The GUI is clean and simple.
Then the trouble started, after hitting OK to start cloning.
The NEAT cloning software write a config file to the old hard drive.
and it re-writes the Master Boot Record. This is one of the critical
parts of you Win10 system. It must load and operate correctly.
It didn't ask for permission, or to make a bootable USB.
It just replaced the critical files with its own proprietary junk.
This is like poring gasoline on a wokken bridge, lighting it behind you
as you walk across. If it works, great! If not you have just destroyed your way back.
I called their customer support, got a hold of the very pleasant (albeit clueless) support person.
She said they only did support via email. Obviously a problem since my computer wouldn't boot.
After slowly type an e-mail on my phone, half a day later I got a hold of a customer support person.
The first email had a list of instructions that just didn't work (i.e command not found). The next e-mail
at least worked, but didn't fix the problem. After a grand total of two e-mails I heard nothing more from
the software support at NEAT.
If you decided to buy this drive, please use other software.
Acronis works very well, or Clonezilla. Of choose a different SSD supplier that uses
better software (like Samsung or Crucial)
Anything that does not have the potential destroy your hard drive while upgrading.
This should have been an easy 1 hour upgrade, instead it took three days.
FYI my test bench used for this Silicon Power 1TB SATA, WD Blue 1TB SATA, Crucial MX500 1TB SATA, and Samsung 860 1TB SATA:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X stock
Gigabyte B450I ITX mobo
Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000 C15 (XMP enabled)
Corsair RM750X 80+gold
Asus Strix GTX 1080 stock
It's not very consistent and will break in performance. You can clearly see this with gaming and video editing.
Gaming: the fps will fluctuate very low when loading new areas of the map. This is the result of the drive trying to read the new zones and let the video card produce the graphics.
Video editing: the timer on the editing goes up and down dramatically. It's not consistent and I've done nothing but watch the video recording in progress.
Samsung magician shows the benchmarks go up and down with read and write speeds.
File transfer shows the same issue when moving large files from nvme to ssd.
NVME SSD:
It's the perfect drive out there. I ditched my old 960 Evo 256gb for this. It boots faster. Transfer files faster. Edit videos faster. Literally everything faster (including breaking down faster than the 960 Evo).
Why it breaks down faster? TLC have a much shorter lifespan than MLC. However, that time it takes to use up all the read and write on the SSD would be in the years. By then, a newer technology will arrive.
This drive went into a PS4 as a replacement for the stock 500GB HD. Not only did it double the capacity everything got faster. Oh and it took 5 minutes start to finish. Seriously, if you have a console (PlayStation/XBox), do yourself a favor and get an SSD.
The other two drives I use through external enclosures as backup drives. I would not trust these drives for primary installations of an operating system. It is safer to use them sparingly to back up data that is not changed much, e.g. for music, videos, etc. storage that is read more than written. The value for the money is really not worth it. I recommend people do research to find the most durable/reliable SSDs for installing an operating system or for other heavy use.
At least whenever the drive came back up I never had a problem rebooting and the drive never was corrupted or lost any data. Which is the reason why I call it a "graceful fail out of the box."
Finally I decided to get a new drive (Samsung EVO) and replaced the SP drive. At that point I was not certain that the problem was the SP drive's fault as it could have been a bad motherboard as well. But after a successful drive swap I placed the old SP drive in a USB cradle on the same machine to monitor it. And, yes, after 5 days the MAC suddenly complained that I had removed the SP drive without first ejecting it. It had simply vanished on its own volition from both Finder and the Mac's drive utility. It only re-appeared after power cycling the drive.
My experience doesn't mean that all SP drives are bad but I have dealt with maybe a dozen SSDs and this was my first bad experience with one.
Secondly, upon receiving my package, I noticed the SSD was placed inside a large envelope with no protection whatsoever, which allowed it to move all over the place. It didn’t end there. As I pulled it out of the ridiculous envelope, I noticed it was ripped and partially exposed. Doesn’t look used so I guess that’s a good sign.
And lastly, I did some benchmarking and the results are absolutely underwhelming. Even my 8 year old Samsung 840 Pro blows this thing out of the water. Only thing installed on the Silicon Power SSD is ARK Survival Evolved. Tried installing the websites programs, but the Sandbox isn’t reliable at all, and there was no firmware update. The price was exceptional at $93 when I bought it, and it’s even cheaper now. However, it’s slower than every other drive of mine, and they are all much older. I give this drive a Meh at best.
The default is 100 samples of 10 MiB for transfer and 1000 for access time.
nvme0n1p1 Tave=0.03ms, Rave=3.3 GB/s with a few dips in the graph, but otherwise flat at the top 3.45 GB/s
sdb Tave=14.68ms, Rave=158.0 MB/s with linear drop from 216 MB/s to 96 MB/s
sda Tave=15.60ms, Rave=133.9 MB/s with linear drop from 171 MB/s to 80 MB/s
sda Tave=0.04ms, Rave=562.9 MB/s - linear with 25 MB/s ramp up in the start 1%. [New SPCC 1 TB SSD on 5/24]
Where Tave is Average Access Time and Rave is Average Read Rate in the above table and the first column is the drive device name. Linear observation based on graph from Linux Disks GUI. The SP is the last one above and the SSHD is the sdb. the SP did much better under Windows because that benchmark read 1GB files which overwhelmed the SSHD cache and the random access thrashed the drive heads.
Also, when you do install your SSD look around online, and find the various guides to optimize your SSD for longevity.
Boot times are nearly non-existent, loading into games is extremely short and sweet. Coming from HDD, this product will blow your mind.
There are other big hitters in the market like Western Digital and Samsung, but they are all the more pricey. After reading reviews on the quality and value of the product, I chose 1 for beginning my build and quickly purchased another for another TB of storage.
You won't get RGB lighting or other fancy features with this SSD, but you will get a great drive for a great price, period.
I cloan everything over it works for a while and then it Blue Screens and it will not stay up on Windows for very long now for the drive itself accessing files that are not to an operating system better hooked up externally it's a good drive just don't have any mechanical hard drive we're running at the same time and you'll be okay I'm an IT professional.
*** Update 2/13/19 I have been using the 1 TB version since I purchased it in June 2018. It is not my boot drive as I have a Samsung 960 EVO 500GB NVME for OS and quick boots. I have been using this as my Steam drive and it has so far worked flawlessly. The price is fair and it is more than fast enough for my games. It is about 75% full now and am considering a second one. 2TB drives are still a little too pricey for me. Since my case has room for up to 5 SSD's I may get another. I am surprised at the poor reviews since most drives in this price range (exept Samsung) most likely use Micron 3d TLC and a Silicon Motion SM2258XT (or similar) controller. These are pretty standard components used in a reasonably priced SSD. What I'm saying is like most SSD's Silicon Power doesn't even make the most important parts. I guess it's always possible to get a lemon, but I would assume most of the bad reviews are more likely due to user/installer error. Also some of the slow reported speeds are likely due to people mirroring their old spinning drive to this and not understanding that they are mirroring a Windows setup not optimized for a SSD but for a old fashioned HD. If they do t understand this they would be better off spending a little extra time and doing a fresh Windows install. I wouldn't select this drive if your doing a ton of writing and re-writing as this drive will slow down when writing huge files, but is way faster than Steam download speeds. I use it for downloading my games and just leave then there. The read speeds are pretty much as fast as a SATA drive can do which is what I wanted. I hope this helped those considering it and should I encounter any issues I will update again, but so far so good.
All laptops and desktops have the current, correct BIOS/UEFI, with SMART drive enable. These disk errors have nothing to with the computer. Disk moved around between 5 computers and the warning errors on show for these specific brand of SSD. Other brands of SSD and HDD (7200 rpm) all work fine in 50+ computers.
It was nice at the time to save $10 or $15 or whatever at the time, but going forward I'm going to be looking for a more prominent brand that's more reliable. I can't outright say Silicon Power is bad or you should not buy it, but my personal feeling is this is definitely a case of you get what you pay for.
Load And write times are pretty fast. Coming from someone who has had nothing but 5400/7200rpm HDDs throughout the years, this definitely is an SSD and I don’t doubt that there are faster ones available, but this one is fast enough and was worth the price other that the strange design.
-Build and finish:
7mm thick plastic body, which cuts cost (bought 1TB for under $90USD) but might not dissipate heat too well.
brass metal threaded inserts for mounting screws
-packaging: similar to other SP products.
double layer thick paper with plastic
Speed: only tested in USB 3.0 for file transfers
write speeds in the 460MB/s range over usb 3.0
Performance:
USED IN XBOX ONE X
Red Dead Redemption 2 loads in under one minute.
Capacity: With Microsoft's File system and Partitions...User Data ends up to be the same ~780.4GB useable on the ONE X.
It first showed it's failure, by causing me kernel errors in windows. Running a quick look at it in SP Toolbox, showed drive Life, at 99%, so I believed all was well with the SSD. It also, threw no SMART errors. However, nothing would permanently delete from the drive and no programs would uninstall. I could install programs, or add data, but remove nothing. That is to say, I could do so, if Windows 10 didn't throw a Kernel error, before I finished an installation. I thought maybe a virus or spyware was causing it, so I tried to run a few tools I use regularly in my I.T. business. None of them could complete a scan, before a Kernel error crashed Windows. So, I then tried to use SFC, outside of Windows, to check system files. It told me the drive was locked. So, next I decided to clone the SSD to a spare 1 TB 2.5" SATA, that I had lying around from one of my many SSD upgrades I do. The drive cloned flawlessly, from outside of Windows, using HD Clone 6, and the system booted right up off the new drive. No more kernel errors, no problems at all, except for it being a much slower drive.
Anyway, I guess I have run into the problem of certain SSD's, where the drive becomes Read Only, which is what appears to have happened this SSD.. I ran SP Toolbox again, this time with wear out count, and it showed bad blocks, that it recognized. 132 new bad blocks, with 11436 to spare. Bad blocks, are much like bad sectors on an HD. All drives end up with some bad blocks, that the OS then prevents from use, but can also be an indicator of immanent drive failure, depending on the count. But in running a quick test, it came up with a message, ERROR BLOCK FOUND: 1546.
Anyway guess I will RMA the SSD. Sorry to be so long winded, but, I thought any potential purchasers might like to know, that this particular drive, the 1 TB model, is the only one I've had trouble with. I will let you know in a follow up, if SP is bad at supporting an RMA, since I've never needed to RMA one of their drives. If they are good, no follow up needed. I've included some pics of the diagnostics for those who care,
Looking at other reviews this brand sucks lasting very long, wish I would have taken those reviews into stronger account before I purchased this drive
If there is a 2 TB version I'd upgrade to it.
I used Macrium Reflect to transfer over all my HDD data to my new SSD and after about 7 hours, all my data was copied over. I then booted with the BIOS and set the SSD as the primary boot up option. Right after that, my PC restarted and opened up to the windows lock screen page about twice as fast. There was no lag when inputting my pin and my desktop loaded instantly after. Immediately after, I am able to load google or any other application and it loads in just a few seconds, RIGHT AFTER A FRESH BOOT UP. WOW.
This SSD has dramatically increased the speed of my PC and is definitely the best computer part investment I've made. For $85, I was able to drastically increase the boot up of my pc, applications, and browsing in general. Oh, also I have an extra TB of space too which is very nice. Excellent product with simple installation.
Won't be buying this junk again.






