Отзывы о Оперативная память Kingston 32 ГБ DDR4 3200 МГц DIMM CL22 KVR32N22D8/32
73 отзывов пользователей o Kingston 32 ГБ DDR4 3200 МГц DIMM CL22 KVR32N22D8/32
Пользовались
Kingston 32 ГБ DDR4 3200 МГц DIMM CL22 KVR32N?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
- + Цена/качество, покупкой доволен
- + -Надёжность
-Объём - - -Не выявлено
- + Цена, производительность
- + Быстродействие. Доволен данной оперативной памятью, работает на все свои заявленные характеристики.
- - нет...
- + стабильно работает, не разгонял
- + -Объём
-Надёжность - - -Не выявлено
- + Отличная память проверенная временем от этого производителя.
- + Работает в материнской плате ASUS B450 Gaming X
- - Не обнаружил.
This SSD is cheap alternative of samsung evo series, with almost same performance. I have used both and I noticed almost no difference in them. It's easy to install, lightweight, can be used to boost both gaming and day to day work.
Don't compare them with nvme ssd, but if your laptop/ motherboard do not have m.2 slots you can replace your existing hard-disk with this sad to get most performance out of your laptop/ desktop.
I will rate it 10/10 on performance when it comes at so much affordable price.
I have an entry level laptop . I put the ssd and windows runs smoothly now ! Even the animations ! If you have an entry level laptop and if you want to do normal web browsing and stuffs , the upgrade will be so much worth it for you !
Even if you are a power user , with more than the basic tasks , it is recommended ,but a better laptop will be more useful with an ssd for you .
I find it improve my laptop speed by 200% . But no improvements will be there in place you where you expect a cpu to work!
Linux users :
Only launching applications and boot time will be helped if you are a linux user ! Gnome animations wont improve ! This will improve the performance. , but wasnt much visible as it was in windows . Maybe its because i have an entry level laptop .
It fulfilled it's purpose.
Boot time was reduced to half.
Apps open and load quicker.
I got 111gb usable storage
I has decided to purchase a new laptop with i5 processor. Fortunately one day I saw this product available at such a cheap price (4300 RS) and immediately decided to give it a try. I replaced my Toshiba 500 GB harddisk with this SSD and immediately my old laptop was ready to compete with newer generation systems. Booting now requires below 10 seconds and Visual Studio also starts in merely seconds. Thanks Kingston for saving my 50K which I would have otherwise utilised to purchase a new laptop.
Pros:
Very Light Weight (feels like a biscuit, wanted to bite!) than my HDD (WD Black).
Thin than my HDD (WD Black).
Easy to install in my laptop.
Can be partitioned in GPT format (for UEFI BIOS).
Faster Booting of Windows compare to my HDD (WD Black), total boot time on HDD was ~3Min now its ~40 Seconds.
Faster Opening of Applications.
For regular operation gets descent copying speed from 2MB-90MB/Sec.
SOLVED FREQUENT HANGING PROBLEM PROBLEM OF MY LAPPY (ThinkPad E460).
Cons:
Poor speed while installing windows 10 Pro (1809) compare to my HDD (WD Black), took ~28 minutes (6th Gen i7 2.6Ghz / 16GB RAM), on HDD it was ~15 minutes.
Poor copying speed from SSD to USB, ~2-3MB/Sec., On my HDD (WD Black) it was ~2-5MB/Sec.
Poor copying speed from Phone to SSD, takes longer time to copy content of phone (S9 128GB) to SSD compare to my HDD (WD Black).
THE POOR COPYING SPEED MAY BE BECAUSE OF PARTITIONING OF SSD (Mentioned in most of the forums) OR BECAUSE IT HAVE DUAL CHANNEL CONTROLLER.
But when I compare the price paid for the product, I don't regret the buy.
I m facing slow boot-up issue.
After upgrading HHD to SSD my laptop turnon within 10-15 sec. No lag after login.
Those who have 4gb ram with win10 i personally suggest this drive.
SSD can improve ur pc app loading time but for heavy app u should also upgrade RAM.
TLC (Triple level cell): Single NAND cell can store 3 bits, therefore SSD will be cheaper, slower and deteriorate faster but will have higher capacity in similarly dense SLC/MLC SSDs. (You don't need to worry about SSD wear, this SSD is rated for at least 1 million hours MTBF.
Dual channel controller: Basically two concurrent streams of data querying capacity.
DRAM cache: High speed memory embedded on SSD to speedup access time of frequently accessed files.
Kingston SA400 is a TLC Dual Controller Single Core (Phison PS3111-S11, last gen's most popular controller) SSD with no DRAM cache, pretty much the cheapest SSD can go.
Therefore it is slower and dumber as compared to Samsung 860 EVO, Kingston UV500, Crucial MX500. But it's also extremely cheaper.
The attached image shows the read and write speed of the SSD but these numbers are mostly misleading. If you are going for a SSD just to speed up the overall experience and snappiness of the OS, you should be looking for 4KB Queue depth of 1 and single threaded workload's read and write speed because that's the most common work load.
Now, a typical 5400 RPM HDD will have 4KiB Q1T1 speeds around 0.5 MiBPS read and 1.5 MiBPS write whereas you can see in the image that this SSD has ~35 MiBPS read and ~82 MiBPS write which is exponentially faster than HDD.
So, going with this SDD will have an exponential increase in speed as compared to HDD, while going for MLC/SLC SSD with DRAM cache and dual channel controller will have marginal increase in speed as compared to this SSD but a much more increase in cost.
Therefore, if you are tight on budget, go with this SSD without a doubt. But, if you have a specialized workload that can take advantage of higher queue depth speeds, multi threaded performance or sequential speeds and you have no issue in spending the extra money then go for more expensive ones. But, I would suggest to go with extremely high performing SSD like NVMe ones that directly communicate with the CPU using PCIe lanes, if you really want something above SA400.






