Фотоаппарат Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit — подробный обзор, плюсы и минусы на основе 147 отзывов
Рейтинг:
Великолепно
Великолепно
Краткие характеристики:
- 24.70 МП
- 23.5 x 15.6 мм
- 3D
- RAW
- до 10 к/с
- видео до 1920x1080
147 отзывов пользователей о Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
Пользовались
Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
16.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I had a Sony A55 for just over two years. Unfortunately it failed twice and I've had to send it out for several weeks to a repair shop both times. I do think this is unusual and it is the first camera I've ever had that failed on me. I decided to step up to the A65 and keep the A55 as a backup. I'm a little miffed at Sony for the poor A55 reliability but I do think it isn't common. I'd have a hard time switching away from Sony. First I have a large investment in three lenses. Second I really like the translucent mirror technology and all it brings to the party. I think Sony is pushing the envelope and the camera has some really nice features.Here are my observations on the A65 compared to the A55.There are a number of web sites that you can use to compare the A55 to the A65 so I won't elaborate on the specification differences. But I did find some things about the camera that I had not read about, and of course there are my personal observations too.1) The weight difference between the lighter A55 and the A65 is quite noticeable to me. I used the A55 a lot and was very familiar with how it felt hanging from my wrist by the wrist strap. The truth is the three lenses I have add so much weight that the overall weight difference with the new body isn't really that much. I'll get over it.2) Size. The A65 is larger but not so much as to resemble one of the huge bodies of other DSLR cameras that just look obnoxious to me. The main benefit of the larger body is the hand grip now is comfortable. The A55 grip was initially too small for me (I think I have average man's hands) and it never felt better with time.3) The extra megapixels. I've never been chasing megapixels. I was quite happy with the image quality of the 16MP A55. So I was quite surprised when I took the first few photographs with the A65 and it's 24MP sensor. I was blown away with the quality improvement, something not born out by all of the technical reviews on the camera. After several hundred photos I've taken over the week I've had the camera I continue to be impressed. The other big benefit is I can crop images on my computer and still have really good image quality even if I've zoomed in 4x or so. Very nice.4) Expecting a lot from the OLED viewfinder that is so highly touted in the reviews it just didn't jump out at me. I'll have to wait until the A55 comes back from repair and compare the two. It does look larger but if I didn't know there was a published big difference I might not have noticed. I am quite pleased with both the A55 and A65 EVFs. After a week of use I have to say the EFV is good, but not so I marvel at it.5) Sony did move some buttons around a bit and for the most part I like the changes. The Video, AEL and tele-converter buttons are moved off the top a bit more and are easier to access and depress. The other buttons on the top of the camera near the shutter have been moved closer to the shutter so they are easier to access.6) I see Sony decided to put a dedicated ISO button by the shutter button, but they removed the D-Range button. This is a big disappointment to me. It may be that more sophisticated shooters play with ISO a lot but I don't do it often enough for a dedicated button on the top of the camera. On the other hand I did use the D-Range button a lot. I find a lot of high contrast shots are better handled by the Auto HDR feature. Gratefully I was able to reprogram the ISO button to activate D-Range but now my D-Range button is labeled ISO!7) I'm so glad the stereo microphone is colored black rather than the silver shown in many photos of the camera.8) The A55 has an infrared focus assist while the A65 uses the flash. I don't know which has better performance but I really like the infrared action over the flash. It is much more subtle.9) The On/Off button on the A55 has a nice crisp snap to it whereas the A65 feels soft and mushy.10) Placement of the small red Access Lamp (used to show when files are accessed on the SD card) is better on the A65. The A55 was too low and small. No big deal either way though.11) I REALLY like the shutter sound. The camera comes with the Front Curtain Shutter ON. When ON the first shutter action is electronic instead of the physical curtain moving. This means there is only one shutter sound per shutter release where as the A55 has a double click. The camera has a nice crisp sound for each photo. A big bonus is the shutter will have 1/2 the operations this way which should extend the life of the shutter. It was a fail of the shutter on the A55 which has it in the repair shop presently.12) When the A65 processes the Auto HDR images it takes much longer than on the A55. I suppose this is due to the larger image size. It is quite noticeable to me.13) I may be wrong about this but when reviewing images on the A55 holding the Zoom In button would automatically step through zooms until it reached the limit. On the A65 I have to manually push the button several times to effect the same result. I'll
Скромный эксперт
04.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Got the camera body by itself rather than with the so-called "kit lenses" since I want to have a better choice of lenses than what comes in the kit.Along with this camera I purchased the following lenses and external flash unit: Sony 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM DT Telephoto Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Cameras Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Camera Sony HVL-F43AM Sony Alpha System HVL-F43AM Flash Unit for Alpha DSLRI didn't purchase everything at the same time so I'm still waiting for the macro lens and flash to arrive.I've tried the telephoto lens and the standard lens already but only on inanimate objects. The combinatin of the camera and these two lenses was fantastic! I'm hoping to do some portrait shots once the macro/portait lens arrive and the flash unit.I'm not a pro by any stretch of the imagination but do have some basic knowledge of photography. Like most people that are not making a living as a photographer, I cannot justify spending thousands of dollars on a camera body and thousands more on lenses so this camera and the lenses I bought fit my budget knowing full well I'm not going to see super professional results but the results are excellent for the money invested compared to other cameras.The only drawback I see so far is the somewhat high noise level with ISO settings of 1600 and higher. I'm trying to stay around a maximum of 400 ISO. I haven't tried the noise reduction feature yet so maybe wtih that I can get good results at least at 1600 ISO. I won't be taking that many photos in low light conditions and with the lenses I have I should be much better off than with the kit lenses in low light conditions.I'll add to this review as I get more experienced with the camera but for now I'm perfectly happy with my purchases.------------------------------------------------------------January 31, 2013 - Here is my follow up review after having received the Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens and Sony HVL-F43AM flash and having put more hours of use on the camera trying out various features.My wife and I and one of our daughters went to a local botanical gardens this past weekend (yeah, middle of winter is not the best time to look for flowers to photograph!) and I took along the camera with the 50mm f/2.8 macro lens mounted on the camera in hopes of finding insects and flowers on our hike thru the gardens. I did manage to find two bushes that had flowers on them (but no insects) and was amazed at the macro shots when I got back home and viewed them on the computer monitor! Colors were natural with no saturation problems and the image was very sharp in the focal plain region. Since the lens also is a 50mm fixed lens I took photos of the surrounding landscape and a few portrait shots of our daughter which turned out fantastic as well.The GPS feature of the camera is not mentioned in the owners manual beyond telling the user how to turn it on and off. I was clueless in what to look for to find the GPS location data until doing a bunch of searching on the Internet. As far as I can tell, the GPS data is not visible in real-time; it is only available AFTER you take a photo and shows up in the display of the camera when viewing stored images. The data is also embedded in the RAW and JPG files which can be used with Google Earth to show the location where the photo was taken. It may take about 10 minutes outdoors with the camera before the camera locks in on the GPS satellites in a fairly open space with some trees around. This feature was not on my list of features I was particularly looking for but it is nice to have.The Sony HVL-F43AM flash unit was tested out taking photos of our black cat and, using the macro lens, taking photos of some small troll dolls my sister-in-law wanted to sell on eBay. No complaints on the flash pictures or the flash unit.The panoramic photo feature was tried out and it did a very good job of stitching the photo frames together but because you have to continuously move (pan) the camera to use this feature there is, of course, some motion blur when you zoom in close in the resulting panoramic photo. This is a feature I don't see me using very often so this doesn't bother me.Battery life is great on the camera and I do recommend buying a spare battery if you are going to do a lot of photos at one time and can't wait for the battery to recharge. Be careful of Chinese made fake "Sony" batteries. I bought mine from B&H Photo since they do cary the real McCoy Sony battery (with Amazon you are taking your chances from what I have read in the reviews).The memory card I bought with the camera is the SanDisk model SDSDX-032G-AFFP which is working out real well for both video and 10 shots/second stills.BTW, I set the camera to store both RAW and JPG images just in case I'm not happy with the way the camera's JPG image is created. So far the JPG images have been excellent 90 percent of th
Скромный эксперт
27.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My previous camera was my first DSLR, a Sony A700. I always had to keep in mind that the viewfinder wasn't 100% accurate in terms of framing, but I loved that camera. It went around the world with me, and served me very well. When I started to hear about Sony's new prisms and electronic viewfinders (EVFs), I had my doubts. Call me old fashioned. I was particularly concerned about how it would perform in low light; photographing dance performances, for example.But I recently got an A65 at work, and also received one as a gift, and it didn't take me long at all to become a total convert. This is a great camera. It's smaller and lighter than my A700 was, but it still fills my hands well. If you have really big hands, you might find it a bit cramped, but for medium/average hands it should feel good.The sensor is fantastic. Doubling the megapixel count hits you in the hard drive, but you can crop the living daylights out of the image and still have fantastic quality. The focus performance is very good, and the button layout makes a lot of sense. It was a very smooth and easy transition from the older Sony. The autodrive speed is amazing; the prism is worth it's weight in gold if you need fast autodrive in a moderately priced camera.Now, on to the EVF. It's fantastic. The level is extremely useful to me; I don't know how much time I've spent straightening a photo by half a degree. No more. The best feature for me is focus peaking. I'd read about it, and it sounded interesting, but now that I've used it, it might be my favorite feature on this amazing camera. My right eye is a bit weak, and I never felt like I had the diopter set right on my A700, so I almost never used manual focus. Focus peaking, made possible by the EVF, shows you exactly which pixels are in focus. It's a fantastic feature. I'm using manual focus more than I even have, and getting great results. Yes, Sony has some of the best autofocus in the business, but there are times when manual focus is just faster, more intuitive, and more creative. And now, for me, it's very sharp and accurate too! I love sweep panorama and the tilting LCD, but focus peaking might just be my favorite feature on this camera. It's changed the way I shoot. Proofing photos without taking your eye away from the viewfinder (again, only possible with an EVF) is also great.So, I'm thrilled with this camera. If you've been wondering, or maybe skeptical, about the latest generation of Sony SLTs, take the plunge. I'm really, really glad I did.
Скромный эксперт
14.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Sony A55 vs. A65: is Newer Really Better?When Sony released info on the Nex-5N, NEX-7, a65 and a77 models, I decided that the technological leaps on the new line was enough to make me a believer. What really put me into the Sony system over Canon and Nikon was the lower price points on the Sony lenses. Yeah, they don't have as many lenses as the Big Two, but I don't know any photographers with 25+ lenses in their closet, either. The NEX-5N looked nice but I like viewfinders and didn't want to be gouged on that accessory. The NEX-7--while pricey--still doesn't have a release date. The a65 was priced below the a77 by almost $500, so that was a no-brainer, but was it $200-worth more than the a55, a camera that--for the most part--touts a devout ownership?I actually bought the a65 and the a55 at the same time, opting for the a65 because of its corrected overheating issue while filming video (the tie-breaker for many) and the a55 because, aside from the overheating issue (a "logical" deal-breaker for many with the arrival of the a65), it offers just about everything else the a65 does, minus some cosmetic differences and a handful of megapixels most of us will never use or need.First, the differences. The a65's swivel LCD is a nice little touch over the a55's traditional vertical flip-out. With the rotating swivel I was able to take shots by holding the camera down low and high over my head. The LCD view on this unit is crystal clear. The electronic viewfinder on the a65 is superior to the a55. (**I'm not going to get into the differences between the OVF and Sony's EVF; if you are reading this, it's because you're either used to EVFs in general, don't mind them, or think Sony cameras are cool, regardless.) The EVF here offers a FULL view of my shots. Also, if you use the EVF instead of the LCD, there is a level meter that basically tells you if your shot is in focus, and if your horizon/vanishing points are perfectly level; this is invaluable if you're taking landscape or wide shots. When shooting people it eventually recognizes redundant faces and will instantly articulate in on the principle person you're shooting automatically if they are in a crowd or shot with multiple people; this I also found to be a rather nice innovation and would be tremendous if I were shooting a wedding and only cared about the bride, for example. The thing that I liked most about the a65 over the a55 however was completely unexpected: on the a65 there is a dedicated ISO button next to the aperture/shutter wheel, and next to it is a dedicated exposure button that will give you accurate adjustments in the EVF before you shoot. AWESOME. After a couple hours of shooting with this unit I could easily toggle between the Aperture, ISO and exposure intuitively by simply moving my finger slightly from one button to the next. In this regard, making on the fly adjustments while shooting on the street was a snap.One cosmetic/function quirk that really bugged me on the a65: the frame-zoom button is in a weird place. Located in the top right behind the wheel and shutter button, I kept hitting it by accident and it was quite annoying. I also didn't like how it basically took me a day and a half to 1) find the playback function for video and 2) toggle back and forth between video and regular picture playback mode. After two days I still didn't know how to download the video off of the card. It was like Easter egg hunting! Also, some of the novelty shooting camera modes looked like fun when I first powered up, but I quickly realised that the shooting potential of this camera was so great that I'd actually be doing a disservice by being too cute with the toy functions. The regular shooting and BW modes were all I truly needed to get really impressive results.The a55 by contrast shoots just a clip slowerŹŹ--though the AF is just as snappy--with little discernable difference, unless you put the camera in review mode to look at shots after you take them, then it sorta bricks out for longer seconds than its successor. (**On the a65 the review mode is default to OFF.) The a55 is also decidedly lighter in weight. I will note that because I have egregiously long fingers, it was actually a less comfortable handle than the a65, and I almost felt like the two models are specifically tailored to different hand-types. Actually, this is a BIG DEAL if you don't care about cute functions: if you have little hands and generally prefer light equipment, the a55 (at $200 less I remind you) carries more value in day-to-day carrying and shooting. If you have bigger hands, the a65 is an absolute must, you will thank me later.Finally, the video mode. On the a65 the quality on the 60i is far superior to anything I've ever seen on a DSLR, hands down. I actually wanted the a65 because it shot in "cinematic" 24p, but I can attest that compared to the 60i on this unit it left a lot to be desired. If you are mulling the a65 specifically because it has a 24p option, do yourself a
Скромный эксперт
10.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Picture/Video quality:Coming from a Canon Rebel XSI and having a friend who bought a Nikon D5100 recently I have some decent comparisons. I'm an amatuer and don't wanna mess with RAW which means my initial impression was based on JPG quality. My primary use is home movies and pics of my kids, mostly indoors/low light. With the default settings I was very disappointed with the results in mid-low light (Firmware 1.03). Something in the sharpening algorithm makes everything look swatchy and unnatural, probably because of too much noise suppression. I took the same pics with XSI and they looked smoother and nicer to me even after downsizing the a65 pics to 12mp. But, on sonyalpharumors.com they mentioned JPG's might improve in some new firmware and in the meantime using -2 contrast, -2 sharpening helps, I tried that and it is dramatically improved for my taste. I also shot in RAW a little prior to that change and could tell there's plenty of detail so there's obviously room for JPG improvement. After playing around with it for a while I'm starting to like it more and more. The autofocus and steadyshot work great during movie mode, a little slow in mid-low light. Kit lens autofocus noise is present but fairly minimal. 60p greatly reduces rolling shutter. Video quality is AMAZING. Exposure, ISO, and AF Modes can all be adjusted during videos. Pictures are great up to ISO 1600. 3200 is fairly decent, 6400 and on degrades quite a bit. Starts up so fast most of the time. Not sure why but sometimes takes 4-5 seconds, most of the time it's less than 1 second from off to pic. Battery life is decent. Took it on a weekend trip, used it about 1/3 of each day for a couple hundred pics and a dozen 1-2 minute videos and got home with 22%. I felt like I had to use it a little conservatively to last the weekend but might be able to improve that by turning GPS off.Novelties:2x Smart teleconverter is nice but no different than cropping a picture down after the fact, would be way more useful if enabled for video. It's nice novelty to be able to review photos/access menus in the EVF, and the quality is great for both the EVF and LCD. Can set camera down with Articulating screen facing you for self portrait because the screen folds out to the bottom. Smile detection didn't work with large group (15 people) probably because faces become too small to detect. Also, if you try to do a self portrait it's so fast that sometimes only one person is smiling and then takes about 5 seconds to automatically start detecting again. HDR/Panorama/Bracketed shots work well. I'm not a big fan of separate folders for pics and videos in review mode. Takes 3 "clicks" to switch from one to the other.Positives:* Autofocus during video/live view works great, a little slower in lower light.* EVF/LCD quality is amazing* Haven't noticed overheating* 60p video virtually eliminates rolling shutter* Super fast startup* No EVF/LCD blackout during burst mode* Menus very user friendly and presentable* Like the AF Zone option (XSI didn't have this. Uses left, right or center AF points)* Exposure, ISO, and AF Modes can all be adjusted during videos* Menus and photo review accessible in EVF* Articulating screen* GPS works well and locks fairly fast* Battery life good enoughNegatives* Default JPG settings disappoints, but can be improved* No smart teleconverter during videos* Pics and videos are separate in review mode* Wish max ISO was configurable in P/A/S modes and video mode* After 10-12 pic burst at 10 fps, slows to 1.5 fps while buffer is clearing. Can still see LCD/EVF tho (just can't burst as fast)* Slow shutdown, although not really a problem* Screen folds out to the bottom so can't set it down facing you for self portrait* Deleting pics a little slow. Takes about 1 second per pic, although multiple delete is available.* Hand grip is a little cramped for my big hands, but not too bad* Not as big of a "newer" lens selection as Canikon. Lots of great older minolta's, but not as many newer budget options that generally have quieter autofocus motors which would be nice for videos.All in all i'd definitely recommend it. I don't think I could justify the a77 personally since there's very few differences I care about. More cross-type AF points, configureable max ISO in P/A/S modes, lens AF micro-adjust and weather sealing are the main ones, but not enough to justify the price. Definitely prefer it over my Canon XSI and friends Nikon D5100 though.
Скромный эксперт
13.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
To start, this will be a review from a newbie. I have no experience in photography what so ever. I have always used a decent point and shoot but never seemed to get a properly focused shot. I decided to finally spend the money and invest in a DSLR. After receiving this Sony, I was immediately impressed with the overall build quality and overall ease of use even though I have no experience with the unit.Between yesterday and today, I have taken approximately 500 shots, some in light, some in dark with flash. Let's just say that this camera can NOT take a bad picture. The details in every single picture that I have taken are awesome. Keep in mind I have no clue when it comes to professional photography, what they would be looking for. The viewfinder itself is amazing to look through. It has the built in level and grid showing focus points and the image is crystal clear. The lcd screen is also very crystal clear and easy to use. I really like how it automatically switches from LCD to viewfinder when you put your face close to it.I find the 18-55mm zoom kit lens to be very nice. I took a few images of some landscaping from about 100 feet away and was able to get some really clear shots. The auto tracking focus does a great job for snapping shots on the go.From power off position to actually taking a picture is lightning fast. Pretty much as fast as your hand can switch it on and then take a picture is how fast it will process the first image.Movie mode I tried a couple of times and it takes AMAZING audio and video. Between movements, there is no sudden jerks or jolts shown in video. Audio is crystal clear.Battery life seems decent. After taking 300 shots and playing with different menu functions and taking video, I still had about 33% left. I will probably pick up a second battery just to be safe.Overall I am very happy with my purchase and look forward to learning the art of photography.
Скромный эксперт
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have owned many cameras in the past 20+ years from different manufacturers. I've never had a Nikon but always used Kodak, Fuji, Canon and as of late Sony. All camera manufacturers have the ability to produce nice to excellent image quality, it is important to have the right tool then go get creative with it. Now for my review.I won't go into great detail but I can tell you that I was always a big fan of Optical Viewfinder's. They let you see through the lens and the image is not an electronic representation of what you're shooting. When the SLT's first came out, I thought I would never get one but boy was I surprised! I like being able to make changes and knowing what the picture will look like before I take it. This is one of the benefits of the electronic viewfinder, also it has an overlay of information regarding the camera's functions, or you can tailor it to your liking.At 10 frames per second, it's really fast. I haven't had any lag issues with the electronic viewfinder when panning my shots, "i.e. birds in flight". But it helps to have a fast shutter speed trust me! The focus speed is also very quick and it will auto track the subject that is in motion. I haven't had an issue with this, except for the very rare out of focus shot.ISO performance is where this camera loses ˝ star. You would be fine up to ISO 1600, but after that details in lowlight get a bit mushy. Also, it depends what you call acceptable. For my purposes, I can print up to ISO 3200 on 8 x 10 and still be happy. Those extreme pixel peepers might want to look elsewhere, but you would be happier with a better lens "wider constant aperture".The JPEG's are for me very acceptable, but for even better image quality you should be shooting in RAW which is where this 24 megapixel sensor excels. Image quality is a matter of opinion for most, but this is not an issue for me.As for the cameras construction, it is mostly made of polycarbonate plastic, with a nice, firm rubber grip and it does feel well-built. This camera is not weather sealed, so if you do purchase this make sure to buy a good camera bag. For that, I purchased the Lowepro Nova 170 AW which is an all weather bag that also has a bonnet to pull over in case of heavy rain.In conclusion, I would say this camera has been worth the purchase for me. You would benefit from buying a good lens and perhaps Carl Zeiss is not out of the question. I hope I have helped "somewhat" with your decision on this camera and if you do purchase, that it will serve you just as well. I couldn't be happier :-)
Скромный эксперт
28.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
My old Sony A100, which has served me well for several years, was due for an upgrade. I did a fair amount of research on cameras in the Sony brand and began to lock in on the A65. The features it contains fit my style of photography very well...which includes just about everything from nature and landscape to events and people, and the price fell within my budget. Many of the comparison reviews I read/watched compared it favorably against comperable Canon and Nikon cameras with the Sony winning out in most categories. My first impressions from day one of its arrival were favorable. My only concern was I wasn't sure how I would like the digital viewfinder, but my fears were set aside when I discovered how easy the digital viewfinder made it to use manual focus...which I need to do sometimes. Using my A100 I just could never get manual focus to work very well...plus my third party 1.4 teleconverter would not autofocus with the lenses I have using the A100, but discovered to my delight that for some reason with the A65, it appears to no longer be an issue...more testing is required though to determine if that holds true.The only negative I see with the camera is that it seems almost too lightly built to be rugged enough for heavy outdoors/nature photography. The old A100 feels more robust than the larger A65. It's certainly not a show stopper, but a noticable factor to me. It just needs to be handled with proper care. My A100 was dropped several times, fell off the tripod a time or two, and had the tripod fall over at least once, plus I used it in rain and fog and cold and heat, and it never failed once...that was one tough little camera. The only other negative was that with my main goto lens...again a third party 50-500mm lens...there was an auto focus compatibility issue with the A65. To their credit, the lens manufacturer offered a free upgrade to resolve the issue and said the upgrade would make it fully compatible...at this writing I am still waiting to test out that promise. So far from what use I've been able to apply...the A65 makes a great upgrade.Update:I've used the A65 for a few weeks now and have fallen in love with it. The upgrade on the 50-500 lens worked beautifully with no issues. The navigation on the menu screens is easy and logical...love the OLED view finder and the video is supurb!
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 147.
Как менялась цена на Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
Характеристики Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
