Фотоаппарат Pentax K-5 Body — подробный обзор, плюсы и минусы на основе 312 отзывов
7.9/10
Хорошо
зеркальная
CMOS
16.3
HDMI / USB / аудио / видео / разъем для пу…
SD / SDHC / SDXC
зеркальный (TTL)
два экрана / работа в режиме видоискателя…
HDR / запись видео / серийная съемка
312 отзывов пользователей о Pentax K-5 Body
Пользовались
Pentax K-5 Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Небулоид-7TLTR
13.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Удобство управления, качество корпуса, большой и светлый видоискатель, отличные цвета
- - Камера устарела, автофокус бесполезен
Автофокус в этой камере можно отключить и забыть о нём навсегда. Зато, видоискатель настолько хорош, что можно фокусироваться вручную даже с плохим зрением. Самое примечательное в этой камере это удобство. То, как она лежит в руке, то как управляется. Пока ничего подобного не видел. Более современные модели (есть опыт с k-1) в продуманности органов управления проигрывают k-5.
Аргонавт-2XCFX
15.05.2016
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Цветопередача, батареи хватает на 700 снимков.
Синтрон-9EQDI
25.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Хорошая эргономика. Пальцы находят необходимые кнопки без проблем, интуитивно. Те же 2 колесика расположены очень удачно, позволяют, приноровившись, снимать в M режиме буквально на лету
Очень хороший внутрикамерный JPG с достаточно широким ДД. На 2013 год конечно уже у многих конкурентов он лучше, но на момент анонса (2010) он был просто замечательный. Да и сейчас выдает
Стабилизатор.
Если приноровиться, то можно получать замечательные HDR фото.
Сборка. За почти 3 года таскания черт знает где, выдержал все испытания на ура
Аккумулятор. Иногда мне казалось, что он перезаряжается сам, благодаря какой-то магии) Но его действительно хватает надолго.
Стоимость оптики по сравнению с аналогичными (по характеристикам) объективами от Canon/Nikon ниже. - - Автофокус. При съемке динамичных сюжетов мажет очень часто (использовал 50-135 и 55-300).
Достаточно тормозная при быстрой съемке нескольких кадров за раз. Быстрая карта памяти не спасает (т.е. можно дорогие карточки не брать).
LiveView не впечатлил (опять же, не самый шустрый). К тому же быстрее сажает аккумулятор.
Видео. Ну, его снимать можно и на этом можно закончить
Мало точек фокусировки. Маленькая придирка, но всё же иногда думаешь, что еще...
ТерраБот-9LVDX
17.01.2015
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Отличная эргономика, качество фото,всепогодность,вес,размер
- - АВТОФОКУС постоянно мажет,корректировки не помогают,юстировка в сервисе тоже не помогла
Оперативно запечатлеть момент особенно динамичный очень не просто.Аппарат для ленивой съёмки природы...
Скромный эксперт
22.09.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am going to write a short and sweet review. I will also keep it not technical that has been done well above. I started digital with the K100D the moved up to the K20D which is a very good camera. I was a pro for many years during the film days and once I got shooting again I love digital. My daughter wants to become a photographer so I am back at it. Here is the only place where the Pentax falls down. They just do not make some of the things a pro would like to have. The K5 cannot tether which in many conditions would be a huge help and even required for others in a pro shoot. You cannot buy a remote flash trigger that allows you to use PTTL. There are just many accessories for Canon and Nikon that I wish I could get for the K5. That said I do love the camera, they really thought out the ergonomics on this one, a vast improvement over the K20D, which by the way was fine, I would never have thought anything about them if I had not got the K5. It is just very intuitive to use, everything is right where it ought to be, I hardly have to bring the camera from my to change settings. The photos are fantastic. I was a bit put off by the auto focus but as it turns out it was the lenses I was using. Okay they were not bad at all I am just being very picky. But when I stepped up to the star lenses the auto focus performs wonderfully. I took a shot of a raft going down a river that I shot through tree branches in the winter, the AF found the raft, ignored the branches and gave me a perfectly focused shot. I rate this camera very high a nine or ten on its use and quality. If the lack of some things that would only really bother a pro doesn't bother you then this is the camera for you, it does out perform many cameras in its price range and even of some vastly more expensice. Shooting at high ISO is great it took me a while to do it as I am old school but I have taken shots at 3200 and 6400 that are great even 12K us usable, 1600 looks like the 400 of other cameras I have used. If you have light room you can easily clean up the noise at the highest ISO as well and get some great photos. Well I guess it was not that short, but I had to say what a joy it is to use this camera. Even if I have to go to a D3s for some studio things and for the accessories, I will continue to shoot with the K5 for a great many things.....of course if Pentax decides to create firm ware to aid tethering hint, hint, I can do without remote PTTL as I shoot off camera flash on manual anyway. Oh yeah the video is great and as for the auto focus, all the pro videographers I know never shoot with auto focus anyway.Okay, now that I have used the camera for a good amount of time I would like to revise the review a bit. I still love the K5, there is something about it that just makes me enjoy having it in my hands. Picture quality is wonderful, as good as cameras costing many times as much but here are the problems that I have had. First I ordered a star lens it came with the autofocus motor not working, it was replaced but still a hassel. Second since I got back into shooting professinaly the K5 has not held up. It is in the shop getting repaired right now. I know that electronic devices break and it did right in the middle of a shoot. I was able to pull out my K20D and finish fine though. I am not going to get into what happened just that it made shooting with it impossible for that day. Where I am really not happy is with Pentax customer service. I have about two months left on warrenty and that seems to make them not so interested in being prompt. They have had my K5 for a month now, they said it would be fifteen to twenty days. I called at twenty days and they said they had just got the camera ten days before. I mentioned that I had a signed receipt for the day it was delivered. They said wait ten days and call back so I did. Then they said the they had just got the camera five days later than before. When I questioned the guy about that he said oh wait there is a hold on your camera because it is on warenty. I asked him if that made a difference on their turnaround time and he just said call back when it has been twenty days, which of course it had been over that. It is hard because I do really like the camera but with this kind of customer service I am going to fork out for the Nikon D3s I guess when you put the camera through pro work you really need a pro camera. I will still use the K5 especially for travel and landscape work. I really dont think that if someone uses the camera like an amature would and not shooting thousands of photos in a day there would be no problems, and maybe not anyway I may have just been unlucky but thanks to their customer service I am going elsewhere before I have so much invested I cant do so.
Вояджер-4PYAY
17.07.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Непередавемые словами качество и эргономика. С фирменной батручкой это ощущение еще усиливается. Действительно сильная матрица с процессором обработки. Приличный темп серийной съемки с адекватным буфером.
Причем, выигрыш от использования сверхскоростных карт незначителен. Достаточно Class6. Адекватное видео с
правильным алгоритмом сжатия (сохраняется каждый кадр, а не только опорные, на основе которых идет усредненный расчет того, что между ними). Управление всеми основными параметрами экспозиции заведено под одну
правую руку и выполняется вслепую, что, я считаю исключительно верным эргономическим решением. Левая для
управления оптикой и режимами АФ. Стаб. Кто бы что там ни говорил про его эффективность с сравнении
оптическим, но его возможности со светосильной оптикой (как раз тогда, когда он больше всего нужен)
потрясают. Уровень горизонта. Очень богатые возможности меню и кастомизации параметров изображения и самой
камеры. АФ...он есть. Особенно в версии прошивки 1.10. Звук затвора. Очень понравился режим следящего АФ в
LiveView - очень удобно перекомпоновывать кадр. Возможность корректирования положения матрицы(сдвиг, наклон).
Возможность автоспуска при появлении объекта в зоне резкости с мануальной оптикой (по центральной точке). Также можно просто вращать кольцо фокусировки, ориентируясь на эту центральную точку. Не всегда точно, но
функция работает и иногда очень выручает. Мне просто приятно держать в руках и смотреть на эту камеру.
Ощущение и реальность таковы, что это - ВЕЩЬ на годы. С правильным весом. - - Будьте готовы сразу же отдать камеру с оптикой на юстировку АФ. Вообще, я так до сих пор не понял истинных
размеров центральной точки фокусировки. Очевидно, рамка в видоискателе неадекватно ее обозначает. Также, возможно, эта точка находится не совсем по центру кадра, как и остальные 4 крестообразные точки могут находиться не там, где моргают диоды, это иногда может ввести в заблуждение по поводу ФФ/БФ. Странно, но попрактиковавшись некоторое время, лично я привык. Но проблема, в зависимости от экземпляра явно присутствует. Возможно, я слишком требователен, т.к. могу сравнивать с флагманскими моделями Canikon. Аппаратные точность и скорость АФ заложенные в камеру хороши, но видимо, подводят программисты. На это указывает прогресс от прошивки к прошивке. Не всегда есть возможность полностью отключить всякие автопомогалки, например, коррекцию ББ при автоустановках Tungsten - можно выбрать только между слабой и сильной коррекцией. Положение фокусировочного экран пришлось настраивать самому. Там такая медная прокладочка, нужно правильно...
Скромный эксперт
30.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The first thing that strikes my each time I pick up the K-5 is how solid it feels. Yet, it is small and lighter weight than all other DSLR's I have owned. Knowing the body (and some lenses) are weather sealed makes it easy to carry in any weather without giving a second thought to sheltering it from the elements. This is how a camera should be built.Shooting is fluid and the K-5 is instantly on and ready with either the power switch from fully off or with the shutter button from its power saving sleep state. Shutter lag is zero to my perception and the camera is clearly faster than me.Having shake reduction built into the body rather than the system's lenses was a great selling point for me. It means I can put on a twenty year old manual focus Pentax-M lens and it has the same vibration reduction as a brand new lens. I have mounted the K-5 to a telescope and also made great use of the "SR" (shake reduction) feature.Image quality is relative to the quality of the lens you mount on any camera. Coupled with good lenses the sensor in the K-5 renders colors accurately and the wide dynamic range provides alot of detail to work with in post processing. I always shoot RAW and find the results consistent and pleasing even straight from the camera.I primarily went to the Pentax system because I liked their small prime DA Limited series lenses. Coupled with the K-5 the 21mm makes a super small package for easy carrying under arm. The 18-55mm kit lens is amazing and my normal choice for carrying while hiking.There are more custom menu and in camera editing features than I would prefer. Some of the Pentax menus are not full intuitive. I think Nikon still wins in that category. So in some ways this may be a Mac vs PC kind of comparison. I guess I am a PC guy. I prefer making exposure and setup decisions myself and am willing to live with some mild idiosyncrasies of menus and button placement.Battery life has exceeded my expectations and while I carry a spare I have never run out of juice and needed to swap while carrying the K-5.
Скромный эксперт
15.05.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
K-5 is not a bad camera. In fact, Pentax has come a long way in catching up with the big two. I am sure that many of the Pentax users will say that in some aspects they have surpassed that of Nikon and Canon. What would be most mentioned in this regard is the improved quality of the new sensor. While I do agree about the improvement and so on, at the end of the day this is an aspect of the camera that Pentax has essentially had no control, as the new sensors were being manufactured by Sony. Therefore, I feel that this is something that ought to be dealt with separately from the discussion of its true worth, (or lack there of). But I do agree; the sensor is a good one. Very good dynamic range, if you are into that sort of thing. Pictures are very sharp and clear, and JPEG outputs made me wonder very much about what kind AA filter this thing has. I know that 645D went without it (good choice), and here look as though they almost went exactly opposite. This is an easy way to please the majority, which translate to sales. But, aesthetically, I am not that fond of this sensor very much. Rather, I found K-7's sensor much more tasteful and sensual, especially with FA limiteds, especially for the kind of work I do.AF felt much more decisive, as it seemed to wonder less. I am in no mood to conduct any types of testing to compare to previous model such as K-7. It is just that AF is not something I use that frequently. I do think that when one mounts a FA limited lens with a screw drive, the difference between K-7 and 5 becomes to me even less of a big deal. To me they are both fast enough, and perhaps one slightly faster than the other.There have been many reports of K-5 AF not performing correctly in various lighting conditions, most notably tungsten of all things. It has been rumored that the latest version of the firmware had attempted to solve this problem, but at it appears that this has not been resolved.High ISO quality is another one of those things Sony improved on, not Pentax. Having said that, there is one important aspect of High ISO that not many talk about. Great high ISO on LCD monitors do not necessarily mean great output in prints. While noise may well be dramatically reduced, I still don't like how they look printed. I would rather that I shoot in as low of an ISO as I can, maximizing lighting and using a tripod. When pics are taken in low ISO (100-400), I really don't see a whole lot of improvement there. I think that this is to me a very significant factor considering its MSRP.I think that this camera at near $1,600 is too expensive. By the time of this review, the price has come down to near $1,300 mark. In hindsight, this was the price range that Pentax should have set in the beginning. Then, this would have been a sensational buy, even for those who have invested in K-7. But, Pentax chose to go the other way, and priced themselves just a bit out of the comfort zone of many consumers. I believe this was an opportunity to lure even more users of other brands.Handling is unchanged from K-7, which was a significant leap from K20D. If one had not upgraded from K20D, handling alone is a good enough reason to upgrade. Compared to other brands, what Pentax set them apart is not the arrangement of buttons, but the size of the camera. It is somewhat smaller than its counterparts, but not significant enough leap to contribute to superior handling. Some may not even like its small size if one had big set of hands. For me it is almost too small. I do think that the viewfinder is very generous, but a bit too dark for my taste.Imaging stabilization is in the camera, not in the lens, allowing nearly all previously issued lenses to be compatible - something that Pentax is known for. You have got to give them that though. At least they don't screw their customers in that department like Canon does. The mechanism itself seems to work ok.Stains - There were stains on the sensors, and something like 60% of them in the early part of production. Sony really screwed them, or that Pentax screwed themselves when installing them. It is maybe the latter, because if the sensors were defective, I would sue Sony. No?? I also do not understand why Nikon sensors which are also made by Sony, do not have stains . . . .So Conclusion:The thing is alright. I give it a 6.5 out of 10.Very expensive at $1,600. At $1,300, much more reasonable.K-7 owners who shoot in low ISO - Do not bother. Not worth it.K20D and earlier model owners - at $1,300 this is a good buy, except that you will now have to deal with the hoopla of the next model, which is probably not that far away. Mirrorless, perhaps.Other brand owners - I don't know about you guys. Probably not worth it. Pentax lenses, especially ones worth buying, are not inexpensive any more. Their lens selection is a bit odd to say the least. This brand Pentax very much own its existence on what is perceived by some to be a "cult" following w
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 312.
Характеристики Pentax K-5 Body
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Pentax K-5 Body
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
