Отзывы о Камера видеонаблюдения Dahua DH-HAC-HFW2231RP-Z-IRE6-POC
80 отзывов пользователей o Dahua DH-HAC-HFW2231RP-Z-IRE6-POC
Пользовались
Dahua DH-HAC-HFW2231RP-Z-IRE6-POC?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Did I mention it has aliens? Oh that. But they are just a vehicle for the larger life issues in the film: Overcoming fear, accepting each other, refusing to accept conventional narratives and forging ahead to follow our instincts and what's true.

While beautifully shot, well paced, and breathtaking in the concept and approach, this film falls somewhere in the realm of the first and third categories (as described above). We are experiencing the flashbacks of the lead character while at the same time being lead down a rabbit hole of intentional jumps in time.
The first time I viewed the film, I swore I would not watch it again. The second time I viewed, I found myself more drawn in, less confused, more engaged. I find the cliche military vs scientist old, stagnant, and not at all imaginative, but the interaction between the interpreters and aliens is creative, novel, and haunting.
It's a good film. Certainly worthy of being a part of your sci-fi collection. Could it be better? Certainly. But it's not bad.


I'll just leave it at that, since saying any more would mean spoilers.
(Literally the only problem I have with this movie is... It's very dark. I don't mean that the story is dark, I mean that it looks like they underexposed all the film. I found it very hard to see anything. Even the outside scene, in full sun - the only one in the movie - is dark. I assume the filmmaker wanted this to be foreboding, but it's very over-used.)



Jeremy Renner did, as others have remarked, bring a little too much of himself to this roll for my taste. Not that he didn't act it well, I just expect a little more from a character when I see his face. Ian's roll felt like a supporting roll, and Renner feels too big for that for me.
But that was inconsequential when compared to narrative of the quandary presented to humanity, and how Louise coped with it. Rather Contact-esk. But almost.... better in some ways. Certainly with more immediate consequences. I've got a copy of Contact on my shelf. But I can easily tell I'll watch this far more often over the years than Contact.
And then the twist. Ouch. I cried for an hour! HA! I need to go watch it again, I'm sure there is more to see and understand now that I've seen it the first time.


1. If you are looking for a space "shoot-em-up" (light-sabers blazing)- you may, as one reviewer said, find this movie boring, however;
2. From the perspective of both common sense and as much scientific-technical knowledge as can be brought to bear, the movie makes a great deal of sense, and is logical:
- the heptapods behave as would be expected by sentient beings who. have physical structure and life-experiences significantly different from humans, employing concepts (semantics) and language at wide variance from humans (see current psycho-linguistic research on mirror neurons and thought [see Metaphors We Live By- by M. Johnson]; and Sapir-Whorf hypothesis); b. humans would most likely behave as those in he movie;
- linking the past and the future, as the heptapods did, is consistent with other aspects of their technology such as language production, and "writing" (see The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Reality of Possibility, by R. E. Kastner- available on Amazon);
3. The screen-writer, director and actors did a marvelous job of character development for humans and heptapods.
In summary- this is a great science fiction movie, and belongs on the DVD shelf with 2001 and both Blade-runners.

What Arrival does though is present its vision accordingly to high standards in visuals and sound. I really love how the aliens were done in this film, and the bassy tones that play with them articulate the emotions of the scene perfectly. The audio is perfectly matched to its source. The drab nature of the film is abstractly endearing in places because of the alien ships. The three leads are also perfect for their respective roles, though, again at times I do have to play along with the pretense because I am invested in the film's more worthy attributes.
All in all Arrival is a solid film that everyone should watch once. The 4K disc looks fantastic, and the bluray is also very good, though, with much less overall detail. It might be a 2K upscale, but there is definitely more detail and nuance on the UHD 4K version. Well worth a purchase.

The communication efforts in the movie make this a 5 star film. The acting and concept bordered on genius. HOW would we begin to 'talk' to a civilization this advanced? What tools would we use? While the film doesn't give us all the answers, the answers it does come up with are intriguing, and very thought-provoking.
This movie would be very hard to watch while distracted. I think you have to be willing to focus and think about what you are watching. Not the typical popcorn movie, but one of the best movies I've seen in a while.


Not a bad idea, in moderation. But this is not moderation. It's pure boredom, because they went way too far..
Nothing fuggin happens. Almost though the whole fuggin film. It's just 133 minutes of Amy Adams feeling her toes.
I love an intellectual film.
This is not an intellectual film.
This is "look mom, I'm different (but not in a good way)," for nearly two hours.
Look, save yourself the time and money and just scrape your fingernails down a chalkboard for two hours.
Painful Truth No. 9.86265 Gazillion: The opposite of a RomCom or action flick is not paint drying on a wall.

SPOILER: I just don't buy even the theory that learning an alien language could allow humans to perceive non-linear time. That and the Eye of Agamotto! And peyote! Maybe another million years of evolution could do it -- or God could do it -- but Heptapod for Dummies? That's stretching Sapir-Whorf to comic book extremes. That's not necessarily bad, but the Christopher Nolanesque ending of 'Arrival' is more sci-fi fantasy than '2001' or 'Contact' ever veered into.

While the trailers lead one to believe this film is a action thriller on par with Independence Day, it's in actuality a captivating thinking person's film that may have (through its own morals) coaxed a small amount of Michael Bay followers to cross over into a different type of Alien film (but probably not).
It carries with it a lot of elemental fragments of "Contact." The plot is a little less explained than "Interstellar" but more than "2001 a Space Odyssey." I loved it because I'm an optimist at heart. I love rational thinking and I have a deep love for what it means to be human.

I loved this movie, up there among the best of my favorites as it wins the 'very different, something new, and in reality, it could happen'... (some spoilers:) Arrival, albeit quite a slow movie, the what happens seemed pretty possible what with how we would expect the world to react... A language that could be a twist off of Doctor Who perhaps, as Gallifreyan is a circular language too, and also deals with time travel. I liked the hints, that learning a language can alter the way you think about stuff - and a circular round as in seeing the future (the aliens need humanity in 3000 years - hmm), and the star seeing her future family and others - that the more she learns their language, the more she can see the future in her mind - cool...

This movie quickly won its place as one of my favorite movies of all time and is worth watching at least twice. If only there were more movies as wonderfully done as Arrival.

While Jeremy Renner turns in a superb performance in the main role supporting, it's Amy Adams's depiction of Dr. Louise Banks that makes this movie. As a Forest Whitaker fan, I was disappointed for his relatively minor role.
In the face of a potential existential threat, we're shown the folly of our ego-centric perspective, ascribing human understanding, in fact capacity, to completely unknown species. Adopting an approach of bringing others to us, rather than the opposite.
Defaulting to a technologically driven defensive posture, in the end, it's our shared humanity that unites us all, enabling us to join with otherworldly species.
This is thoroughly entertaining story. However, it does require attention and thoughtful evaluation throughout. oh, and be sure to press pause when a break is needed, because you won't want to miss a single moment.

Scientist can talk about the validity of Sapir-Whorf. But the movie is a science fiction, not science. It's done its job if it fascinated us and got us to think. That is what art is about. And it indeed got me to think about the power of language to determine who we are. As a complete bilingual, I'm keenly aware that I'm a different person when I speak in Korean as to when I'm speaking English. Not only you cant seperate culture from language, you can't separate self from language either. This has been expounded on several thousand years ago by Buddah. (Buddhist text is full of phrases in the form of 'neither A or not A' to demonstrate reality is but a delusion constructed by language).
Again, this movie is not a science. But it is an art that is spectacularly successful because it entertains us with possibilities and gets us to think.

In the west, we often regard abandoning focus on the self as a mental disorder. For a Buddhist monk, it's the highest state of enlightenment: Nirvana, meaning living suspended between fear and desire, accepting suffering as a necessary condition of being alive rather than living life with the aim of avoiding suffering. We believe that if we get it right, we can avoid suffering entirely. Suffering is for losers. "I prefer people who don't get captured," for example.
Yes, I know this interpretation can seem like a whole lot of new age hooey. And I'm certainly as far from being a Buddhist as you can get without a prescription. I can't live that way. What makes this film interesting is that it took nearly unimaginable, earth-shaking events and traumas for the hero of this story to achieve this.
All science fiction is allegory and metaphor, usually dreadful. This one, however, is brilliant.


Or maybe, like Peter Watts "Blindsight," aliens might interpret our radio waves, music and speech as a form of an attack.
Either way, I love this film because it makes us think and ask bigger questions. I often wonder, who is out there in the universe and what will they be like. The music and imagery of this film are wonderful.

