Отзывы о Микрофон проводной BEHRINGER SL 85S, разъем: XLR 3 pin (M)
53 отзывов пользователей o BEHRINGER SL 85S, разъем: XLR 3 pin (M)
Пользовались
BEHRINGER SL 85S, разъем: XLR 3 pin (M)?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
A Feist fan
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I haven't actually used it yet but the test was good. It worked as well as I expected! Could've been better but at £19.99 It's good enough! It could've been a whole lot worse! I've had a few teething problems but they are Windows and program specific.
alex
08.01.2021
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Allora partiamo dalla spedizione ; il corriere ha sbagliato luogo di consegna con una differenza di 30 Km, cosi alla fine siccome la mia consegna è stata trattenuta dal corriere per accertare l'origine dell'indirizzo, mi sono recato io stesso a ritirare il pacco. Per quello che riguarda il microfono , vale quello che si spende ; qualità appena sufficiente e comunque vale quanto il famoso bm 800 della Neewer , che essendo un microfono a condensatore , è meglio del Behringer sl-85s
Never
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It's really good. Go for it.
Dennis
08.01.2021
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
If you are expecting a Behringer XM8500 with a switch. you won't find it here. Their responses are completely different.
The SL85S has an overly bright sound with very little midrange. It has a lot of midbass handling noise and will require a high pass (100Hz or higher) filter. It has noticeably lower output than the XM8500.
It has far less presence in the mid-range than the XM8500. The highs are crisp and intelligible in a good way, but are not in balance with the missing mids and the bump in the mid bass. The overall sound is a "scooped-out" mid with emphasized highs and lows. This may work for some applications like mic'ing an instrument, but for me, the "scoop" removes too much "presence" in the vocal range for singing.
The SL85S has an overly bright sound with very little midrange. It has a lot of midbass handling noise and will require a high pass (100Hz or higher) filter. It has noticeably lower output than the XM8500.
It has far less presence in the mid-range than the XM8500. The highs are crisp and intelligible in a good way, but are not in balance with the missing mids and the bump in the mid bass. The overall sound is a "scooped-out" mid with emphasized highs and lows. This may work for some applications like mic'ing an instrument, but for me, the "scoop" removes too much "presence" in the vocal range for singing.
Max M.
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Very pleasantly surprised that such an inexpensive piece of gear performs so well. Seems very well built, and even comes with a hard shell carrying case. Great value.
Показаны отзывы 49-53 из 53.
