245 отзывов пользователей o TP-LINK TL-SG1024 V11
Пользовались
TP-LINK TL-SG1024 V11?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Кварковец-4KLPJ
08.12.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Надежность
Простота в использовании
Цена - - Отсутствовали винты в комплекте
То что нужно для неуправляемого коммутатора, плюг/плэй,...
ИнфраГость-8TOKV
19.12.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Прост в эксплуатации
- - не обнаружил
все работает
Гравитон-0TYFD
14.07.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Проверенный бренд. Никаких дополнительных манипуляций с подключением.
- - Нет.
Подключил и забыл.
Альфа-Юнит-8MCXB
21.04.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + работает, не греется
- - нет
норм
Синтрон-8UGUL
13.11.2018
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Недорогой, неприхотливый, стабильно работает.
Индикаторы гигабитного подключения на порту.
Купил, поставил и забыл,...
Вектрон-8ENYA
13.11.2018
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
- + Недорогой, неприхотливый, стабильно работает.
Индикаторы гигабитного подключения на порту.
Купил, поставил и забыл, 2 года работает в офисе.
Один раз только перезагружал, хотя дело может было и не в нём.
Но сравнивать пока не с чем.
Один раз только перезагружал, хотя дело может было и не в нём.
Но сравнивать пока не с чем.
МехаРейнджер-8OIFE
22.05.2018
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
- + 24 полноценных гигибитныйх порт РЖ-45, высокая пропускная способность передачи данных. Энергоээфективен в сравнении с другими коммунаторами. Поддержка функции автоматического определения и запоминания МаС-адресов. Гарантия 36 месяцев
С бонусными баллами получилась самая выгодная цена.
ОмниКод-4KRNL
15.06.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
- + Поставил и забыл держит офис хорошо сбоев небыло
- - нету
Понравился
НеоВояжер-9LISD
09.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Хороший, стабильный, гигабитный свитч, поставил и забыл.
Аэронавт-8ELLM
29.11.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Дешевый и работоспособный
ИнфраГость-1NIKM
14.09.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Качественно сделаная вещь. Я доволен.
Лунатик-1AZWL
14.09.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Включил и все работает
Пандорец-2HVQU
14.09.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Пришло все в целости и сохранности. Пользуемся вторую неделю, пока что сбоев нет. Свич в идеальном состоянии. Доставили очень быстро, курьер связывается за один час, очень вежливый. Дали все проверить, товаром довольна!
Капеллан-0VAXE
19.07.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Поставил в стойку, включил и забыл про него. Работает стабильно.
НеоВояжер-6VEZZ
30.08.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Отлично работает, скорость держит нормально
НаноРейдер-2TNFP
08.06.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Поставил в стойку - крепеж прилагался
Tp-Link автоматически определяет скорость и не требует настройки...
Фотон-6MWXF
01.06.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + отличный агрегат
- - не наблюдал
Аргонавт-5SEHI
07.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have a gigabit hard wired network throughout my home, so I need gigabit switches wherever switches are used. I have several TRENDnet 8-Port Unmanaged Gigabit GREENnet Standard Switches in my home, and this inexpensive one seems to work just as well. Both remain cool to the touch, are energy efficient, and automatically detect which ports are in use to conserve power. Both automatically detect whether you are using standard or crossover cables, and both work fine with either type.If you are using this to connect your devices to the Internet, chances are any good switch will work for you. If you are copying large files throughout your network, such as copying a 7GB recorded TV program from one computer to another, you want it to go just as fast as if you were copying from one high speed drive to another within the same computer. This will handle the load just fine. You won't find yourself waiting for several minutes, as you might with a 100base-T switch.One limiting factor I hit was that if the ends of all your cables have boots surrounding the plugs, then the fit might be tight or even too close for all the cables to go in. But that's the case with other switches too, and won't be a problem with most commercially terminated cables.Another factor, although it's true for the Trendnet also but is not a universal issue, is that the port numbers are printed on only one side of the lights. So if you mount this to the wall, the numbers will be upside down.When comparing this with the Trendnet switches, there were a few other notable differences. The Trendnet is more expensive and has a much higher list price, although the typical selling prices are closer.The Trendnet has a solid metal case, and the TP-Link has a cheaper plastic case. In either case, I keep mine mounted to the wall and don't anticipate any real world difference.The Trendnet has two rows of LEDs, making it easy to tell at a glance whether there's an active link, whether there's data being transmitted, and whether the link speed is high speed. For practical purposes, it would be good to be able to tell at a glance what the connection speed is, but the Trendnet will tell me if it's 100 or above, or below 100. So without being able to tell at a glance whether it's 100 or 1000, I don't consider that a significant feature. TP-Link's single row of lights tells me all other relevant information.Technical specs are pretty close, although the TP-Link boasts a 15K jumbo frame rate, vs 9K for the Trendnet. That makes it theoretically better for larger files, but for practical purposes the limiting factors in my network will be hard disk speed. And even my largest video files will transfer in under a minute either way.Both are power saving units. The Trendnet claims to save up to 70% power vs 80% for the TP-Link. I couldn't measure any difference and would have to take long term measurements to find any, so I doubt they would be significant.The power adapters are virtually the same size and shape, with minor differences in voltage. The TP-link adapter has the company logo on it, as well as the company name on the sticker. That may not seem like a major advantage, but I have more power supplies and adapters than I can count, and matching them up isn't always easy.The Trendnet has a three year warranty, and TP-Link offers a two year warranty, according to the website. They didn't make it easy to find that out. Generally if a product like this doesn't fail in the first few months, it's not likely to fail in the next few years.Overall, the TP-link comes out ahead on most all of these very minor points. Since the price and the power adapter are the only ones that would make a practical difference for me, even if minor, I can't see a compelling reason to get the Trendnet instead. But I can't see a reason to stay away from it. Either way you will get a quality product, and if you decide to get this to save money, you won't be any worse off for it.
Дроид-6PJPI
07.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
All the Gigabit Ethernet ports on my wireless router were in use and I needed to connect another device, and the 8 Port switch from Chinese company TP-Link looked like a good solution. I also wanted to change some other devices from wireless to wired connections, and leave room for future expansion."N" wireless (Wi-Fi) is the predominate connection method and the advertised speeds are very fast, 300-600 Megabits per second (Mbps) with even faster versions appearing in the market. In use, wireless is actually much slower than the stated speeds and prone to fluctuations and interruptions, which is especially bothersome when watching video content, such as movies on Netflix or Hulu, which will sometimes pause or stop entirely.Because of these problems, I decided to go back to good old wired connections, and the current standard speed rate is 1,000 Mbps, commonly known as 1000BaseT, also called Gigabit Ethernet. Wired connections are also much less susceptible to interference from outside sources, such as wireless signals, phones, remote controls, etc. So, I expect to be able to watch movies without any interruptions, and enjoy generally faster speeds on all network-related communication. Using wired connections, if video content or the Internet is slow, the Internet provider will be the cause, not my network.The instructions for the switch are simple: place it on a flat surface, plug in the power, and then plug in the devices. So, I powered it up, connected my devices and added a connection to the wireless router.I used Category 5e (Cat5e) or 6 (Cat6) cables for all of the connections. The instructions in the Quick Install Guide that came with the product, as well as those in the online User Guide recommend category 3, 4, and 5 for 10 Megabits (10BaseT) connections, Category 5 and 5e for Fast Ethernet/100 Mbps (100BaseT), and Cat5 for Gigabit Ethernet. This is clearly a mistake - I believe they meant to recommend Cat6 for Gigabit, but even if that was their intention, both Cat5e and Cat6 are approved for use with Gigabit Ethernet.Most vendors do not recommend using Cat5 with Gigabit Ethernet because much of the wire sold as Cat5 will not operate at full speed in Gigabit networks, even though it is good enough for 100 Mbps networks. Gigabit Ethernet devices will sense that the wire is not performing well and drop back to 100 Mbps. Many switches use different colored lights to indicate the speed of the connection, but this one provides no way to determine the speed of the connection.This switch only indicates whether or not the connection is working, but not the speed. In an effort to view the connection speed I checked the Windows computer I'd attached to the switch, and it showed it was operating at the full 1.0 Gigabit speed. Note that if replacing a 100 Mbps switch with this switch and continue to use old Cat5 cables, probably no benefit will occur, other than possible power savings.I streamed video for a baseball game, basketball game, and a movie on devices attached to the new switch without interruptions of any kind, which is an immediate improvement over my previous wireless setup. Files copied between machines connected to the switch were noticeably faster as well.The switch has two "Green" features, described as automatically cutting the power to inactive devices and balancing power, based on the length of the connected cables. Unfortunately, the switch's lights do not indicate when these features are working, and there is no easy way to verify the manufacturer's claim of up to 80% power savings.
Супернова-0OKKS
03.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
.Nice. Quite similar to TRENDnet's switch. Prices are very bouncy and coming down. See Pricing below.Green circuitry shaves $8 to $25 off your electric bill over 5 years. (see Note 1). - - - Intro for Novices - -This is like a power strip for your network cabling. Turns one feed into many. "Unmanaged" means it's dead simple. No configuration, software, or settings. It does not substitute for a router.If your router does not have enough cable ports, this is your answer right here. If you have a network cable running to your TV, but your TiVo, Blu-Ray, Roku, X-box, etc. also want network access, this is the ticket. Or the 5-port version, which turns one feed into 4. - - -PROs and CONs - - -PROs: * Green circuitry saves $ * Nice price (at low tide) - Transformer plug does not block other outlets - Slots on bottom for secure mounting (wall, shelf, or bottom-of-shelf).OKs: - Fit and finish seem perfectly fine - Packaging is green and hassle free - 2-year warrantyCONs: - None yet- - - Compared to TRENDnet Models - - -As of April, 2013, TP-Link and TRENDnet seem to be the two leaders in value-priced green switches. I have both, and like the TRENDnet a little better. But the differences are small. Check prices and just pick one.Slight advantages of TRENDnet: - 3-year warranty vs 2-year - Lower energy cost ???? (was not able to do apples-to-apples comparison. See Note 2) - It's tiny (5.38" x 2.79" x 1") vs small (6.5" x 4.25" x 1.18") - Metal housing- - - Alternatives - - -A 5-port model is about $7 less, on average. A 100-Megabit green model (TRENDnet) is on average about $7 to $12 less than a Gigabit green model. Plenty fast unless you're moving very large files between local machines. - 5-port Gigabit TP-Link Green - 5 port...100M-bit...TRENDnet Green - 8 port...100M-bit...TRENDnet Green - 5 port...Gigabit...TRENDnet Green - 8 port...Gigabit...TRENDnet Green- - - Pricing - - -Prices are very bouncy for these switches here on amazon. There's an "Online Price Alert" that will email you whenever this or any amazon product dips below your target price. Google it. It's nicely done. Or try camelcamelcamel, which also shows price history.- - - Tips - - -Blinking lights - If they bother you, cover them with masking or electrical tape.- - - Notes - - -Note 1: Each watt is 8.76 kWh per year (24x365). That's $ .96 to $2.89 per year (@ $ .11 to $ .33 per kWh). I used a Belkin F7C005 Energy Monitor to check each switch. Green circuitry saves about 1.5 to 2 watts, 24 hours per day.0 ports active:0.5 watts TRENDnet TE100-S80g (Green)1.0 watts TP-Link TL-SG1008D (Green)2.6 watts Linksys EZXS55W3 ports active:1.4 watts TRENDnet TE100-S80g (Green)1.9 watts TP-Link TL-SG1008D (Green)3.45 watts Linksys EZXS55W5-ports active:2.1 watts TRENDnet TE100-S80g (Green)2.32 watts TP-Link TL-SG1008D (Green)Note 2: Energy comparison was between the 100 Megabit TRENDnet model and the Gigabit TP-Link model. There was almost no data traffic, but the apples-to-oranges comparison might be unfair. If anybody has the 8 port Gigabit Trend-Net Green model and a meter, please measure and comment.~~~ Comments & questions welcome ~~~
Спектр-1AWLZ
07.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I needed a gigabit switch to add some ports to my Airport Extreme 802.11N (5TH GEN). For some reason, the 3 provided ports just are not enough for my expanding network. The TP-Link Tl-SG1005D seemed like a good choice for a low cost solution.As you can tell from the pictures, this switch won't win any design awards, especially sitting next to my slick white Airport Extreme. In contrast, the TP Link gigabit switch is a utilitarian looking black plastic rectangular box with 6 green LED's in the front. One LED is for power, the other five are for the port status. Unlike most switches, a single green LED handles all of the information. It is lit when there is a link, and it blinks when there is data activity. There is no link speed indicator for each port on this switch, you must rely (and believe) on the hardware to determine that.For the price, you can't beat the TL-SG1005D. TP Link claims they are "The Reliable Choice". If this switch stands the test of time, it's a good deal for all of the features you are getting. This a "Green Switch" which powers down unused and idle ports, and is able use less power based on the length of the cable, all which probably TP Link's closest competitor, TRENDnet 5-Port Unmanaged Gigabit GREENnet Switch (5 x 10/100/1000Mbps Auto-Negotiation, Auto-MDIX Gigabit Ethernet Ports) TEG-S50g (Black Metal) can also do, but at a higher price. The box claims that the energy saving can be as high as 75%. The TP Link TL-SG1005D can also handle Jumbo Frames, though the information on box and user manual differ here. The box claims 15K, while the manual says 9K, so I'm not sure which is correct. As with most TP-Link products the user manual is hard to understand, they really need to hire someone who is better at English to write these manuals. A few last features to note is the Auto-MDI-MDIX which eliminates the need for a crossover cable where situations may warrant one, and also the fan-less design allows for wall mounting.I've only had the TP-Link TL-SG1005D for a few days now, and so far it has been a great speedy addition to my network. It is as if the computer is plugged directly into the router, no difference. Now I have 6 ports to plug things into instead of just three. Keep in mind you lose a port from the router (in my case an Airport Extreme - so now I am down to two on that), and you also lose a port on the switch to the router connection (so that gives you four on the switch). I just hope that "The Reliable Choice" is dependable and lasts a long time, at least it comes with a two year warranty. Oh and one last thing - The cardboard box and internal pulp tray make the packaging easy to recycle.
КиберНаблюдатель-7YAOP
21.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
My home network seems to keep growing, and now has a router, a 20 port network switch, and there always seems to be another "connected" device showing up. Most of my devices are on wired connections, and I have resorted to using additional small switches to avoid running more ethernet cables to the main switch/router. I added this switch to the entertainment center, which always seems to need more ports.=== The Good Stuff ===* I connected the power, plugged in the network cables, and everything worked just fine. This switch actually plugs into a port on my main network switch, a Netgear 20 port switch, which then connects to a D-Link router. Everything connected to this switch was able to get an IP address with no problem, and all devices seem well behaved.* This is my first switch with gigabit ethernet capability. There are a few devices on my network that have gigabit capability, and when they are both plugged into this switch, transfers sure seem faster. Unfortunately I really do not have a good way of measuring actual speed on this part of the network, so it was more of a stopwatch test.* The switch has functioned for about a month with no hiccups.=== The Not-So-Good Stuff ===* There is no way to tell from looking at the switch if a 100MB or 1000MB connection has been set up. C'mon, how much could 5 more LED's have cost?* There are only 5 ports on the back panel. Since one of these must be used to connect "upstream", this switch only gets you 4 extra ports. The ports are marked 1-5, so I used port 1 as the upstream connection. Worked fine.* While the box was printed in English, the only documentation inside was printed in Spanish. Luckily the switch is pretty much self-explanatory, but might upset some users.* I know it is a futile quest, but I am really not all that impressed by the coolness factor of LED's flashing when I am trying to watch TV. Electrical tape is a marvelous invention, but I would love it if electronic equipment all came with a "blackout" switch to turn off all the LED's unless I ask for them.=== Overall ===* The switch seems to perform exactly as promised. It is not the most attractive looking piece of electronics I own, but it certainly serves its purpose and has performed well with a minimum of fuss. The lack of a 100/1000 indicator is inexcusable, but I will no doubt manage to go on in life. If I was buying this product (as opposed to a free sample), I would have purchased a version with a larger number of ports. No matter what, something new always seems to show up with an ethernet connection.
Альфа-Юнит-4YNWB
03.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
In terms of performance, for most home users, this little 5-port Gigabit switch should be fine, though I would note that if other's homes are like my home, 5 ports may not be enough, or not really enough for more than say a distant room that is connected back to the main router for the home. It seems that I can never find enough network ports to connect all my devices with more and more devices looking for a connection to other devices in the home, or back to their own home bases (devices such as TiVo, Apple TV, video game consoles, Blu-ray players, and things like that).In my own home, I've been able to string cables to the various rooms in the house, and then on the other end of those cables I've connected Gigabit switches so that the network speeds are as high as possible. With the various switches that I've purchased and put into use, the switches automatically determine MDI/MDIX which means there is no need to manually select an "uplink" type mode to connect back to the router or switch on the remote end and no need to plug into any special port on the switch (which used to mean plugging into a designated port and reducing the number of useful ports in the switch).Comparatively speaking, this device works well. It is lightweight (the box that the device ships in is probably heavier than this device) and is designed to be lower power usage and low heat generation. Low heat generation should (hopefully) result in longer life as the electronics aren't stressed by constantly running at warm or hot temperatures. It could and should also mean a little savings in not having to run your air conditioning as long to help combat the heat that is produced.The obvious cost-saving design results in not having a quick visual determination of the port speeds that are being provided on this switch as the designers opted to just offer an indication that a port is in use rather than showing the speeds that are in use on the port. Other switches that I have and/or have used have been a bit higher budget in that area as they show the port speeds with different colors. With those switches it is/was easy to see that a device is connected at Gigabit speed versus slower speeds.Priced very competitively, this device should work well for budget-conscious home users.
ТерраБот-5VNDI
26.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I just got and installed the TPLINK TL-SF1005D 5 port gigabit desktop switch. I expect to update this review in a few months after living with it for a while.The TPLINK replaces a Netgear FS105 10/100 5 port switch. Before changing over I wanted to see what it meant to have a green switch. I used a Kill-A-Watt power meter - a very cheap unit but surprisingly accurate in my experience.The Netgear FS105 drew a consistently varying amount of power between 2.5 and 3 watts. For calculations I used 2.5 as the number for this switch. The TPLINK TL-SF1005D drew 1.5 watts on startup, but dropped to 1.1 to 1.2 watts after a few moments. Two lan connections are short (3ft) and one is 25ft to an 8 port Trendnet green gigabit switch. The deal with green switches is they reduce power on short run ports or power down disconnected ports to save power. The TPLINK is also a gigabit switch vs the 10/100Mbps Netgear that it replaces. The was a literal swap-out so the comparison should be valid and the TPLINK uses a bit less than half the running power.I went to National Grid web site to find out the current cost of electricity here in Massachusetts. With transmission and a bunch of niggly charges my residential power comes in at about $0.1325 per kilowatt hour. I did the mathc and TPLINK would use 21KWH in a 365 day year, the Netgear 44KWH. The operational savings is just over $3.01/year. So if you are looking for the TPLINK to pay for itself in power savings be prepared to wait 7.5 years or so at current rates!In other matters, the case is molded plastic and is about 50% larger than the Netgear FS105 which has a sturdy metal case, but the indicator lights are on the front rather than on the RJ45 jacks themselves as is the case with the Netgear. It isn't the kind of construction likely to survive being rolled over by a heavy person in a office chair, but who keeps a switch under their office chair?The switch appears to run just fine. I have not noticed any particular improvement in performance yet or any compatibility anomalies. Maybe when I'm doing some large file transfers. With the Netgear I had to occassionally power cycle the netgear as it would hang after some power glitches (all too common here). I'll see how the TP link does with these as times goes by.
Показаны отзывы 1-24 из 245.
Лучшие цены сегодня на TP-LINK TL-SG1024 V11
График изменения цены TP-LINK TL-SG1024 V11
Характеристи TP-LINK TL-SG1024 V11
| Общие характеристики | |
| Тип устройства : | коммутатор |
| Возможность установки в стойку : | да |
| Коммутатор | |
| Количество LAN-портов : | 24 |
| Базовая скорость передачи данных : | 10/100/1000 Мбит/с |
| Скорость Ethernet : | 1 Гбит/с |
| Внутренняя пропускная способность : | 48 |
| Размер таблицы MAC адресов : | 8192 |
| Тип управления коммутатора : | неуправляемый |
| Дополнительные характеристики | |
| Особенности : | установка вне помещения |
| Сетевые стандарты : | IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, Jumbo Frame, автоопределение MDI/MDIX |
| Ширина : | 440 мм |
| Высота : | 44 мм |
| Глубина : | 180 мм |
| Вес : | 2.38 кг |
| Дополнительная информация : | коммутатор - 1 шт, адаптер питания - 1 шт, резиновые ножки, комплект деталей для монтажа в стойку, руководство пользователя |
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
